Mavericks experiences (good or bad) with FCP X

Having updated to Mavericks today, I am happy to report that my mac now behaves soooo much better under heavy load.
As it has been often discussed in this forum, low free memory used to slow down everything, and in particular FCP X.
Memory management has been significantly overhauled in Mavericks and so far it seems this is a great improvement.
In my unscientific tests, even loading some big applications when free ram was already depleted resulted in no spinning beach balls at all. I was able to continue work with no significant slow down.
I would like to hear any reports of your experience with FCP X under the new OS.

… hmm, if THIS is reasoned by Mavericks, it is marvel:
The coach of my soccer-kids asked for a 'multi pip version' of our games - all 5 perspectives simultaneously in one 1080-video…
Only the material in window 'main' was optimized; all others were NOT imported to an FCPX-Event, just the original h.264 stuff; plus a time-code as 'title'.
I knew, this would need a lot of time on my under-powered MacMini/2.24/8GBs ...
pt.I took 14h for a 35min video …………… I'm in no hurry.-
pt.II was a lil' different: a) in my first attempt, for convenience, I 'compounded' each 'track'… in pt.II I sticked/synched the parts together manually; and, in pt.I I forgot to add a plain black as background, so, theoretically, the storyline was transparent.
Aaand, pt.II now with Mavericks
=> 6h! yepp, this is a six, not 14h!
this is pure anecdotical, I changed too many parameters btw I and II to call this a 'test' …
but I'm flabbergasted!

Similar Messages

  • Goods and Bads with the 6110 Navigator

    Hi
    New user of this forum and a proud owner of a Nokia 6110 Navigator. I had the 6280 but after 2 SW upgrades and still problem with it, I gave up.
    First impression of the 6110 is good, but I found a couple of small things that ”irritates” me.
    1 – The timer function when you write “0200” and press options instead of green (call) button.
    2 – The original headset is too cheap to be an expensive phone like this, should be more like Koss “plug-in-your-ear” kind of headphones, instead of the small “put-close-to-your-ear” thing that is included.
    Also, the straight up cable from the top of the phone is no good. Makes the phone lie bad in the pocket. I also guessing that this cable is going to snap after a while. Why not a 90 degree “adapter” or something?
    3 – When you sending an SMS, on my 6280 you could choose “last used number” or something like that, now you have to choose name, and then number, and then OK to go back to the SMS.
    Well.. that’s it so far. Anyone else have goods and bads about this phone ?
    mvh / regards
    Timmy

    hi im havin same issues!!
    i went from 6280 to 6110 after i smashed it
    1.first off i didnt kno of the timer option...good bcoz it was annoyin not havin a stopwatch
    2. that "recent use list"...lack of it...is annoying. i just made groups of ppl i msg most
    3. menu organisation is confusing
    4. in call history, it only shows most recent time for that entry, ven if they rang 5 times that day, also they dont show call long eg duration of 3mins 40secs
    5. on my 6280, i had a shortcut menu as mi left select button, cant do this now
    6. power button is end call button, lotsa accidental turn offs
    7. cant turn off start up tone
    oh well i still like it

  • HT2105 When you get a apple receipt for itunes songs and you paid with a itunes gift card do they charge you or give you store credit what's store credit is it good or bad or does it charge you if you have a free account with no credit cards at all is it

    When you get a apple receipt for itunes songs and you paid with a itunes gift card do they charge you or give you store credit what's store credit is it good or bad or does it charge you if you have a free account with no credit cards at all is it bad?

    iTunes credits are, for example, if you download a song from the store and it's found to be corrupt - if the track can't be fixed then iTunes support will tend to give you a song credit for a free download.
    When you purchase music from the store then any credits that you have will be used first, then any balance that you have (e.g. from iTunes gift cards or allowances), and any remaining amount will be taken from your credit card.

  • Capture with iMovie – good or bad?

    Hi there
    I have heard various opinions, but I am not sure what to make of whether having iMovie as part of your workflow is a good idea or not.
    On trips we sometimes use 2 camcorders, and on returning it is very useful to import the footage using iMovie 8 for cataloging. One reason for this is the fact that it names the file according to the capture timestamp, making it possible to order all the clips according to capture time. The cameras are HDV, and iMovie converts the clips to the Intermediate Codec.
    My question is, for the enthusiastic amateur, does this workflow have negative impact on the quality of the footage, and if so is this effect enough to consider a change in workflow? The projects are done in FCP eventually and output on SD DVD.
    Any help appreciated
    -hannes

    Shane's Stock Answer #20: Using iMovie to Capture for use in FCP.
    iMovie handles the media differently from FCP, specifically where audio is concerned. So it is not a recommended workflow. Here's why...
    iMovie captures using DV Stream (.dv) standard which does not use timecode. That is a big disadvantage over the way that FCP captures in that you can't go back and recapture the material at a later date if you need to revisit a project.
    The DV/NTSC specification (the one FCP uses) also calls for seperate tracks for audio and video, even if you capture it as one clip. iMovie' DV stream format is muxed audio and video, which means that they are tied together (I can't get into specifics because I ain't no engineer or programmer). FCP is a bit more demanding and captures the seperate audio/video tracks, either in a single media file or as seperate video and audio files. With FCP you could capture video only or audio only because each is defined by the DV specs. while with iMovie you can't.
    Also, if you drop the iMovie footage into the timeline, your will get the RED render bar forcing you to render the footage in order to see it. You can use either QT Pro or Compressor to convert the .dv footage into DV/NTSC in order for FCP to work with it without needing to render.
    Shane

  • I HAVE A I MAC WITH MOUNTAIN LION BUT WHEN I DOWNLOAD MAVERICKS ALL STAR GOING BAD AND RIOGTH NOW THE COMPUTER DOESNT START I AM **** UP HOW CAN RESTORE MY ORIGINAL OS LION MOUNTINE

    I HAVE A I MAC WITH MOUNTAIN LION BUT WHEN I DOWNLOAD MAVERICKS ALL STAR GOING BAD AND RIGTH NOW THE COMPUTER DOESNT START I AM **** UP HOW CAN RESTORE MY ORIGINAL OS LION MOUNTINE.
    OR WHAT CAN I DO TO RESTORE MY COMPUTER THERE IS A LOT INFORMATION THERE WHY MAVERICKS IS TROUBLESHOOTING.

    Don't post in all caps.  Besides being more difficult to read it's tantamount to shouting and is considered rude in forums.  What problems are you having? What model Mac do you have, how much RAM and free space on the boot drive?
    Boot into the Recovery volume (boot with the Command + R keys held down) and try the following in order as needed:
    1 - select Disk Utility and repair both the disk and disk permissions.  Reboot normally.
    2 - reinstall the Mavericks system.
    OT

  • My Story. (reply with yours, good or bad)

    Im a perfectionist and ive admired Apple products since the dawn of the MacBook. I was unable to afford anything Apple untill the first iPhone was released. 3 months after owning it I knew I wouldn't want any other phone again.
    In my opinion, the iPhone 4 is 99% perfect, but its that one percent that iritates me. I don't get dropped calls, but i do notice the signal problem every now and then. It doesn't affect the way I use it, but knowing it may cause problems if I hold it differently (for example, in bed, lying on my side) is allways at the back of my mind, this is that one percent.
    Im getting a case soon and that should solve the issue, though im not getting it for that reason. The amount of grief I get from friends about the "Death Grip" (Just because they heard about it on the News), sometimes makes me think about other phones, but not for more than a second. The clarity of the screen, the fluidity and consistency of the software and the amazing HD video, these features combined in such high build quality and a stylish design, no other phone out there comes close. I love my iPhone because of its features, but I couldn't switch to another phone with better features because of the software. Its something that I don't often think about, but benefit from everyday.
    Happy days, Andy

    Shane's Stock Answer #20: Using iMovie to Capture for use in FCP.
    iMovie handles the media differently from FCP, specifically where audio is concerned. So it is not a recommended workflow. Here's why...
    iMovie captures using DV Stream (.dv) standard which does not use timecode. That is a big disadvantage over the way that FCP captures in that you can't go back and recapture the material at a later date if you need to revisit a project.
    The DV/NTSC specification (the one FCP uses) also calls for seperate tracks for audio and video, even if you capture it as one clip. iMovie' DV stream format is muxed audio and video, which means that they are tied together (I can't get into specifics because I ain't no engineer or programmer). FCP is a bit more demanding and captures the seperate audio/video tracks, either in a single media file or as seperate video and audio files. With FCP you could capture video only or audio only because each is defined by the DV specs. while with iMovie you can't.
    Also, if you drop the iMovie footage into the timeline, your will get the RED render bar forcing you to render the footage in order to see it. You can use either QT Pro or Compressor to convert the .dv footage into DV/NTSC in order for FCP to work with it without needing to render.
    Shane

  • Compressor 2 with FCP 5.1 workflow

    I've been reading about using Compressor 2 with FCP 5.1 and have been a bit surprised by some of the following suggestions:
    These are from Larry Jordan's website:
    "Compressor 2 has problems with both motion estimation and 2-pass VBR. If you are using Compressor 2 make sure to select 1-pass VBR Better and set Motion Estimate to Better. Using Best settings creates very poor video.
    There is a lot of talk on the Apple discussion site that 2 pass VBR gives artifacts, especially on transitions and is generally to be avoided.
    To compress the file in Compressor, DON'T use "Export to Compressor" in FCP -- it doesn't work reliably. Instead, open Compressor, then drag the file into Compressor and adjust settings.
    In their effort to tackle the problem of overshooting data-rates in C1, Apple seems to have ruined the quality of 2-pass VBR encoding to some degree. I've seen quite a few cases now where 2-pass VBR doesn't look as good as the simple 1-pass.
    The new version of Compressor has technology in it that is not duplicated using QuickTime conversion.
    I have never been comfortable with exporting using QuickTime Conversion. For one thing, it automatically down-samples your movie to 8-bit. For another, it will not be as good a quality as Sorenson Squeeze for the web, or Compressor for DVD. Third, Apple removed the MPEG-2 compression option with the release of QuickTime 7. Finally, the codecs it contains, while adequate for home use, are not up to professional standards either in terms of file size or image quality."
    So, from what I gathered from Larry's website...
    Use VBR 1 pass instead of VBR 2 pass for best quality
    Use Motion Estimate Better instead of Best
    Compressor offers better quality compression than Export>Quicktime Conversion
    Don't use Export>For Compressor from FCP, instead export a FCP reference file from Export>Quicktime and use that in Compressor.
    What do you think?
    Thanks,
    Richard
    ref:
    http://www.larryjordan.biz/articles/ljdvdexport.html
    http://www.larryjordan.biz/articles/ljbitrate.html
    DUAL G5 2GHZ   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   2.5 GIGS RAM

    Well, different "experts" with slightly different views.
    This from hanumang's response to Jerry Hofmann over in the FCP discussion forum:
    FCP unrendered to Compressor 2?
    hanumang, have you seen a quality difference using the compressor method?
    Jerry
    In my experience, yes, there is most definitely a difference in quality.
    For sake of completeness, when it comes to exporting for DVDSP, this is how I'd break it down:
    File > Export > Using Compressor on unrendered timelines in FCP. The best way to do things with FCP & Compressor - especially true if (as mentioned) you're working in some compressed format like DV and doing lots of filters, motion effect and compositing within FCP. In my experience, color correction comes out much cleaner on DV-sourced footage.
    On a 1-10 scale, with 10 being the best that Compressor outputs, this method is a 10
    File > Export > Using Compressor on rendered timelines in FCP. While inferior to #1, this tends to work better on high-motion footage that needs to be encoded at a low bit rate (which I'd consider 5 Mbps or lower) than #3 because of the frame-by-frame processing. Also, transitions tend to come out better (again, at lower bit rates).
    I'd rate this method a 7 out of 10
    File > Export > QuickTime Movie with DVD Studio Pro Markers, then import into Compressor 2. While this rates at the bottom, in many cases it's hard to distinguish the output from #2 & #3 unless you're encoding at a 5 Mbps or lower bit rate
    I'd rate this a 6 out of 10
    In terms of encoding times, if #3 is my baseline, #2 takes about 2-3x as long. #1 takes about 4-5x as long as #3 for me (depending on the level of complexity).
    Dual 1.42 G4, 2GB RAM, 9800 Pro, 20" Cinema; Mac OS X (10.4.6) Final Cut Studio 5.1

  • Why does iDVD '11 image quality suck so bad with a slideshow?

    First of all, I have spent the last few days trolling forum after forum trying to understand the problem. It seems that for years and years people have been complaining about this issue and nobody ever gives a satisfactory answer.
    Ok, I understand the difference between an HD 720p movie and a lower resolution DVD movie at 720/702x480 resolution. I get that. It means that the DVD version has to recalculate the lines using some interpolation algorithm. I can think of good and bad ways to do that myself - I am a software developer and an electrical engineer. I realize that a TV monitor is much bigger than a computer monitor and the lower resolution on a larger monitor won't look as good. What I am seeing goes well beyond that. I am seeing splotchy blacks, awful pixelation, moire effects in water and around just about any two parallel lines, and the occasional odd red-then-green-then-freeze frame.
    Here is what I don't get: When I watch a commercial DVD on my TV, it does not look like crap. Sure, a Blu-Ray looks better, but a DVD is quite acceptable. When I watch the slideshow that I made in Aperture, assembled in iMovie, and wrote out as 720p, it looks terrific on my monitor. If I do it as 720 (Large) it also looks terrific. When I downgrade to 480p (the same resolution as a DVD), it looks fine as a .mov file. However, when I take any of these .mov files and go through iDVD to produce a DVD file, I get horrible results - it looks like I used old VHS footage that I had accidentally left in my microwave. Even changes in resolution of the input file seem to make no difference. Why is this?
    I have tried using "Best Performance", "High Quality", and "Professional Quality". I would rather label them as "Lousy", "Lousy", and "Lousy". To my eye, they all look equally poor.
    Is there file file format that I should be using rather than the default .mov format? .dv or .m4p? Is there some other setting I should be setting? Does the DVD media itself make a difference? I am using Kodak DVD+R media. I read somewhere that Verbatim DVD-R was the way to go. Is this true?
    Finally, is there perhaps another route I should be exploring? I looked at DVD Studio Pro, but that is not affordable. I considered writing a Blu-Ray instead, but buying a burner and software is not worth it at this point. What about another app? Even on the PC, I am flexible.

    There are many ways to produce slide shows using iPhoto, iMovie or iDVD and some limit the number of photos you can use (iDVD has a 99 chapter (slide) limitation).
    If what you want is what I want, namely to be able to use high resolution photos (even 300 dpi tiff files), to pan and zoom individual photos, use a variety of transitions, to add and edit music or commentary, place text exactly where you want it, and to end up with a DVD that looks good on both your Mac and a TV - in other words end up with and end result that does not look like an old fashioned slide show from a projector - you may be interested in how I do it. You don't have to do it my way, but the following may be food for thought!
    Firstly you need proper software to assemble the photos, decide on the duration of each, the transitions you want to use, and how to pan and zoom individual photos where required, and add proper titles. For this I use Photo to Movie. You can read about what it can do on their website:
    http://www.lqgraphics.com/software/phototomovie.php
    (Other users here use the alternative FotoMagico: http://www.boinx.com/fotomagico/homevspro/ which you may prefer - I have no experience with it.)
    Neither of these are freeware, but are worth the investment if you are going to do a lot of slide shows. Read about them in detail, then decide which one you feel is best suited to your needs.
    Once you have timed and arranged and manipulated the photos to your liking in Photo to Movie, it exports the file to iMovie 6 as a DV stream. You can add music in Photo to Movie, but I prefer doing this in iMovie where it is easier to edit. You can now further edit the slide show in iMovie just as you would a movie, including adding other video clips, then send it to iDVD 7, or Toast, for burning.
    You will be pleasantly surprised at how professional the results can be!
    To simply create a slide show in iDVD 8 onwards from images in iPhoto or stored in other places on your hard disk or a connected server, look here:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1089

  • Panasonic AG-DVX100b good or bad?

    Hey guys ok so i have tons of problems with my canon gl2... anyone out there DONT GET IT!! if your going with fcp for all i know 1. dropped frame rates alllll the time look at other peoples comments its true! 2. myn has a rewind issue.... its really annoying. Anyway thats not what im here for i am thinking of sellign my canon gl2 and getting a Panasonic AG-DVX100b since everyone says it works great with fcp 6 can you give a good or bad? tell me whats good about it whats bad... any info i should know... and if it works good with Final Cut Pro 6... i hope you help me out if you need this im on a macbook pro with final cut pro 6.0 and its a panasonic ag-dvx100b i hop that covers it!

    Of course you find only ISSUES when you search the forums for the GL2...who posts that they are having success? No one walks into a doctor's office and says, "My arms feel really good, and my lungs are clear." No, they go to the doctor's office saying "I am having trouble breathing, and I broke my arm."
    If you search the forums, you see plenty of posts with people having issues with DVX cameras too. Especially the forum dedicated to that camera. True, Canon cameras are a bit more finicky, but they work fine. Some have issues, others do not.
    Shane

  • Migrating assistant good or bad

    Hi guys...
    This is my first post so be gentle... I just have a small question for you guys and girls... what is your view on the migrating assistant, is it good or bad... i have heard someone saying that it migrates some files over that mess up your system... and if it does how do i know which to delete.. and second of all can you choose exactely what to bring over or does it just take everything... is targetdisk mode a better option... maybe a bit more timeconsuming but safer...?? Please give me your opinions... Thanks... ohh forgot to say, reason why im asking is that im planning on buying the infamous MBP..
      Mac OS X (10.4.6)  
    ibook g4 1.33   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   Really want MBP

    I would say that this is a WARNING [capital letters - if you can't tell already ;- ) ]
    My friend - who is a computer tech [Mac & PC] since the Apple II days. For all of you that don't know - that is 30 years ago. He bought his first BRAND NEW computer ever - yesterday - A MacBook Pro 2.16 w/ 7200RPM HD [off the shelf at a local Apple store]. He has made a LOT of money from repairing computers - he didn't have to buy this MacBook, because he has EVERYTHING else - he bought it because the MBP represented the ability to have the Mac OS + WIN XP on the same machine. And also - his clients were asking questions about the MBP, and he had to know - first hand, what they were about.
    He used the migration assistant to transfer his files from his PowerBook G4 - 17" [1.67MHz] - and there was disasterous consequences! After the transfer - the new MBP wouldn't boot to the desktop - until several restarts later. Finally when he could - there was some very weird stuff going on.
    1. No Airport recoginition
    2. Screen stayed on full bright [couldn't be dimmed]
    3. His BlueTooth cellphone would shut off [I know - this is crazy - but it is true, the MBP somehow killed the cellphone connection!]
    4. Kernel panics - [many]
    He [with 30 years experience] promptly returned the MBP to the Apple store - and showed it to the "Genius" - who immediately gave him a brand new one.
    He [or the "genius"] never had any reason to doubt the "integrity" of the "Migration Assistant". My friend thought that his MBP was defective - and the Apple "Genius" thought the same thing.
    So - he took it [the new one] home - and used the "Migration Assistant" again - and the exact same thing happened!
    Finally - he just decided to re-install the whole operating system [clean install] - and now everything is fine.
    If I were you - I wouldn't trust the "Migration Assistant".
    PM G5 1.8 SP REV A   Mac OS X (10.4.2)  

  • How to use third party plugin with FCP, I'm lost...

    Hello,
    I need informations about how to use plugins with FCP.
    I do edit mostly classical concerts. I'd like to do basic audio post prod, without swaping between Soundtrack and FCP.
    I need two simple things : add reverb (the built in reverb is really bad), and enhancer. So I looked for specialised third party audio plugins, but I couldn't manage to find something that work for me...
    - Do FCP support VST plugins ? How to install them ?
    - I tried a few audio units plugins. It works, but I couldn't get a friendly visual interface, like VST effects racks. Is it possible in FCP ?
    - does anybody know a good reverb plugin with a friendly interface compatible with FCP ?
    Please help, I'm lost !
    Emmanuel

    I need two simple things : add reverb (the built in reverb is really bad), and enhancer.< </div>
    What you NEED is a better recordist at the concert, someone who understands the peculiarities of your specific video deliver plans.
    Soundtrack Pro is right up there with Motion in its impossible-to-understand interface paradigm shift away from industry standard tools. However, if you are in the position of being a sound editor, you must find a tool that works for you. STP might not be the one, certainly isn't for me. You could always try Logic. Yeah, good luck with THAT.
    bogiesan

  • Sony NX5u with FCP - it will help me to compare what others are doing

    Earlier today I posted a topic regarding issues I'm having with SD footage shot on my NX5u cameras being very interlaced. Further, when viewing the footage on an SD tv (either via an external monitor through Firewire right off the timeline, or, exporting footage and burning to DVD via iDVD) it is very jumpy or jittery. A deinterlace filter helps this some, but not nearly enough to be comfortable giving product to client.
    So, what would be helpful now is simply to hear from others on how you're handling footage from this camera in FCP - particularly SD. My camera settings are SD 720x480 60i. When playing this footage back on an HD tv the interlacing is severe, utterly unusable.
    Compare this to my old camera (Panasonic DVX-100B; 720x480 60i) where the footage would appear somewhat distorted on an HD tv, but nothing more than as to be expected when viewing SD footage on an HD tv. But from the Sony camera it is not even usable, professionally.
    I'm trying to trouble shoot and first determine if the "problem" is in camera or FCP. Further, with FCP capture settings, timeline settings, export settings, etc.
    If you haven a suggestion then great, but I'm asking anybody using the NX5u with FCP to respond and just tell me your experience. That will help me troubleshoot.
    Thank you,
    Eric

    Thank you for your reply David.
    Sorry for the lack of details. I thought about posting screen shots from the tv, so I will try that now, good idea.
    Anyway, the camera is the Sony NXCAM HXR-NX5u. It records AVCHD files to SDHC cards. AVCHD files were converted to ProRes 422 upon L&T into FCP. As I learned in Shane Ross's tutorial on log & transfer workflow, I should have dumped the original files from the card onto a harddrive first, but to this point I have not done that. I have taken the footage straight into FCP (via converting to ProRes 422).
    Late yesterday somebody mentioned to me that these cameras have had issues with SD. I haven't heard anymore on that or what issues they are.
    As for the image quality being subjective, I understand what you're saying, but the amount of interlacing visible is far worse than anything I've done in the past (ie, tape-based SD cameras).
    Am I able to upload a picture here or should I post it somewhere else and provide a link?
    Thank you,
    Eric

  • Share Experience - T400 pre-installed with Windows 7

    Hi,
    I have recently ordered a new T400 pre-installed with Windows 7. I am yet to receive my laptop which I am eagerly waiting for, however, I would like to know what has been the experience (good / bad) from the people who have already received thier systems. This will help me check out on those aspects when I receive my system.
    Not sure whether it was a good choice to select 32 bit OS -> Comments please.
    Thanks in advance.
    Following is the configuration that I have ordered for as it appears in my order status
    01. INT.CORE2DUOPROCT9600
    02. GENUWIN7PROFES.32
    03. GEN WIN 7 PRFS 32 US EN
    03. 14.1 WXGA+ TFT, W/ CAMERA
    04. INT.GRAPH.MEDIAACCELX4500
    05. 3GBPC3-8500 1067MHZ2DIMM
    06. KYB US ENGLISH
    07. ULTRNAV(TRP+TOUCHP)FINGERP
    08. 320GBHARDDISKDRIVE,7200RPM
    09. DVDRECORD.8XMAXDUAL,ULTBAY
    10. EXPR.CARDSLOTXN7-1M.CARDR.
    11. INTEGR.BLUETOOTH PAN
    12. INT.WIFI LINK5300
    13. INTG.WIR.WIDENET UPGRAD.
    14. 4 CELL LI-ION BATERRY
    15. BLUETOOTH W/ANTENNA
    16. INTEG.WLESSANTENNA:14.1"

    fundoo77 wrote:
    Not sure whether it was a good choice to select 32 bit OS -> Comments please.
    IMNSHO, always go with a 64 bit OS.  With Win 7 32 you will probabaly be able to use all of your RAM, but if you add more RAM at some point you won't be able to use it without going to a 64 bit OS.
    A 32 bit system can address 4G of address space but Windows tends to reserve the top 1G (more or less) for addressing installed (and future) peripheral devices and graphics card RAM.  Any RAM above ~3G simply goes to wast.
    Just my $.02.  You asked...
    Z.
    The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc.  The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Firestore FSC with FCP..?

    Hello I was thinking of purchasing a firestore FSC (tapeless recording) but two things consern me...How does it work with FCP..?(Good or Bad) And also (a little off topic) how is the battery life on it? I see that it comes with a 90 min battery or 180min...Anyone used one and can answer this question for me...
    thanks

    The firestore works like a P2 card mixed with an external hard drive.
    i.e. You capture to the firestore, mount it as an external drive, move you files to whatever drive you are working from and import like they are p2 files (really they are) into FCP. All in all, it works awesome with final cut.
    The battery life is good. It doesn't last quite as long as they tell you it does but that's the same with any portable device.

  • External Hard Drive for PowerMac G5 for use with FCP Studio

    Hello,
    I'd greatly appreciate any recommendation for an external hard drive for a PowerMac G5 for use with FCP Studio.
    Thanks.
    -graziemile

    We see alot of Lacie issues here and elsewhere.
    Drives fail... period. I believe you hear more about Lacie drives failing because they sell a ton more of them than many other suppliers. I've got 8 of em sitting right here on the desk and two more at the second station. I've lost one since I started using them years ago (and it had problems right out of the box) and I use them pretty heavy.
    I understand that they use several different brands of drives in their enclosures, but from my experience they must have pretty good QC standards for what they package.
    The guy said the G Techs were a little overkill for his needs. Lacie doesn't pay me. But if someone asks "how are Lacies?" I'll tell them they've been great for me and many others I know, especially if your requirements are capturing DV.
    In five years, I ain't heard anybody say anything about it.
    As for FCP. I love it! In 20 years of business, it's probably the purchase that's given me the most bang for my buck. But if you haven't heard people knock it, you've never met an Avid zelot, bruhhhhh, just the thought gives me shivers.
    The drives X mentioned are designed for video work.
    What Studio said, well he gives out some of the best advice on this board
    (and maybe the most! ) and my reply to his post... that's why I used the little smiley face. No offence intended X.
    I only meant to say that, in a world where software like FCP can do what it does at the price it does it, and drives like Lacie and G Tech can give you the storage they do for the price they do, the line between consumer and professional products is easily blurred.
    rh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sony F-55 premiere cc 7.2 media pending

    Hello, After updating to 7.2 and 10.9.1 i have a project with some Sony F-55 footage, and some Canon C-300 footage. Its all MXF. Now all the Sony F-55 footage is Media Pening ALL the time, the thumpnail is availabel sometimes but it will not play. I

  • Is it better to run parallels alone or bootcamp?

    I had an older MBP and at first i was running bootcamp alone with my autodesk inventor software. Then i happened to buy and install parallels and everything ran perfect! Within the last week I upgraded to a new MBP with a faster processor and twice t

  • Problem in useful life of the asset?

    Hi, I don't know what and where it is going wrong so need your suggestion please: We have created one new asset class and trying to check dep. in testing server but system is calculated dep. with useful life as 10 years only for all the assets I have

  • Essbase External Security via Shared Services

    I have hit a problem with essbase external security via shared services, might be fairly trivial, first time doing this. In the install guide for essbase 9.3.1 it mentions not to use the user 'admin' when firing up essbase server console mode for the

  • Can't seem to figure out why I can't load my music into Itunes??

    Hello Hello! Ok so I updated my itunes lately and for some reason I can't seem to load any new songs into itunes (I do it the manual way *file *add file to library *click or highlight songs and press *open) and it still wont show up on itunes. Is the