Max capacity of ufs filesystem

What the max capacity of ufs filesystem in solaris for sparc?
Can it be lager than 10TB?

From "man ufs":
Multiterabyte File System
A multiterabyte file system enables creation of a UFS file
system up to approximately 16 terabytes of usable space,
minus approximately one percent overhead. A sparse file can
have a logical size of one terabyte. However, the actual
amount of data that can be stored in a file is approximately
one percent less than one terabyte because of file system
overhead.
.. looks like it, i would advise against it though.
.7/M.

Similar Messages

Max UFS filesystems size for Solaris 2.X

What are the max limits on UFS filesystem sizes for Solaris 2.6, 8 and 9?
Thanks

It's called a "search". ;) SunSolve Info Doc 76856.
Solaris 2.6 - 8 -- 1 TB limit
Solaris 9 and higher - 16 TB limit
Individual files, however, can only be about 1,012 GB.

UFS filesystem limit on solaris 10 - sparc

Hi All,
I have one question in regards with soalris UFS file system on Sun Solaris 10 Sparc.
currently i have one mount point with 1.5 TB of space with UFS filesystem connected to EMC SAN, now i am going to add one metalun of 1 more TB and exapnd it on SAN.
In regards with this i have some concerns:
1) Will UFS support 2.5 TB on a single slice?
2) Simply growfs command will work or do we need to perform additional steps?
Steps :
--> bkp data and umount the filesystem
--> run devfsadm
--> use growfs command
--> mount partition again
Any suggestions in this regards are really appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

user12143664 wrote:
Hi,
Many thanks for input.
May i know how can i start scsci auto detect in format?
Lun detected with new capacity but not displaying in partition table even after labeling the disk.
11. emcpower1a <DGC-RAID 5-0429-2.44TB>
/pseudo/emcp@1Current situation:
Part      Tag    Flag     First Sector          Size          Last Sector
0        usr    wm                34         1.46TB           3145711582
1 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
2 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
3 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
4 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
5 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
6 unassigned    wm                 0            0                0
8   reserved    wm        3145711583         8.00MB           3145727966I tried zero VTOC its not working as slice 2 wa already zero.
Need help.
Thanks in advance.FWIW, that's an EFI label. Above a certain size, "standard" Solaris disk labels don't work, so EFI labels are required. Is that the same as the VTOC that was available before you enlarged the LUN. IIRC that limit might be 2 TB.
Since you refer to slice 2, I am assuming here the old label may not have been an EFI label. Also, EFI labels do not support overlapping slices, so the old Solaris convention of slice 2 being the entire disk no longer applies.

Satellite A500-1DU - What is HDD max capacity

Hello,
I have to re-install the factory installed Win 7 on my Satellite A500-1DU because I am not able to install SP1.
The cause is that the product information inside Win 7 is missing.
Regarding this I like to install a new HDD with more capacity (current 400gb).
Which HDD can I install and what is the max capacity (1TB, 750gb)?
BIOS is current.
Any hint is welcome.
Thank you in advance

Hi
From my knowledge there is no limitation in HDD capacity since the SATA controller is used and the SATA controller should support more than 400GB.

My battery has a current max capacity of 97% after only 2 month ...

Hi everyone.
I don't know if I'm a little bit paranoid but I just checked the current max capacity of my battery (Macbook Pro 2012 13") with different softwares as Battery Health or Battery Guard (available on the App Store) and it reads 97% after only 2 month and 3 cycles ... Is it normal?
I'm kinda worried, the loss of capacity seems so fast, to me ...
More details : this capacity was 100.6% just before I tried to calibrate it. I followed the advices of Battery Health :
1) Charge the battery until 100%, then wait 2 hours with the Macbook plugged
2) Use it, until it shuts down by itself, then let the Macbook 5 hours at least without charging it again
3) Charge the Macbook until 100% again
After this manipulation, my max capacity lost 3 percent ... Is this something I did? Is it normal?
Does the Macbook have to calibrate his battery again? Then, what's the manipulation to do to calibrate it (I looked for it on the Apple website, but I can't find a step-by-step)?
Thank you all

Battery capacity degrades over the life of the battery for a lot of reasons and will fluctuate from day-to-day by a percent or two. Instead of using apps to read the battery, you can get all the info you need right from the system itself. Click the apple in the upper left corner, About This Mac, More Info, System Report, Hardware, Power and then just read the battery Capacity, charge Cycles, Condition, and Voltage. As long as the Condition is Normal you are fine.
Although Apple says to calibrate the battery by discharging to shutoff and then recharge, that in reality is not good for Lithium-technology, and it does not calibrate the battery, it calibrates the charge reporting circuitry.
If you go to the Battery University site, an independent group that has done a lot of studies of batteries, you can find information on prolonging Lithium-technology battery life. One thing that is clear is that deep discharge cycles are very degrading on battery life. Optimum balance of use/life seems to be around a discharge to 50% and then recharge. Also, temperature is a major player in shortening battery life.
At thiis point, don't get too hung up on the battery capacity, use the MBP and enjoy it.

Max capacity of Mini SD for N80?

Hi there, can anyone tell me the max capacity the N80 can take please? I heard a 2Gb will work but would a 4Gb or larger? (although not available yet i don't think)? Many thanks ;o)

no, the point is your making a mistake.
nokia support the minisd format, it can fit in the phone and the phone can read it. the point you are failing to make is why can it not read every minisd card and why can it not read all capacities.
the phone cwill have trouble opening larger capacity cards as the software (symbian) cannot cope with it. we are only just seeing 4gb in the n91 - it will take some time for greater memory cards to be supported.
your point on cd rom is wrong, there are a number of different ISO standards, not all devices will play them. it is the same as dvd...
you may be better off saying my pc has a 144 dimm slot, therefore it should use all types of dimm together, be they ddr400 ddr800 or rdram.
you are also mistaken that nokia phones only work with nokia cards, they just tell you dont expect to get support when your card doesnt work. rufao is correct in saying this, if nokia dont make the card, and the card doesnt work (but the nokia one that came with it does) then why should they pat money to support it?
again, lets look at your point on sony, are they not about to release a hi-dvd format that only their players use and they support? are they not about to enter into a format war over blu-ray?
all in all patc, all your arguments are incorrect. nokia phones can read minisd cards, not all cards are compatible and this is why many third party sites offer a compatibility list.
for example, i have a 2gb minisd in my phone it works as the phone can handle that amount of memory. for my psp i bought a sandisk 4gb stick - it doesnt work..... so who do i blame

Current Capacity Max Capacity

Hi,
i am working on weblogic 8.1 sp5 ,with the following configuration:
initial Capacity =20
max Capacity =20
Capacity Increment:2
after fail over operation
i got that the current Capacity of the pool become 22 which is bigger than max Capacity
is there a specail problem with this veriosn of weblogic or how can i explain this ?
Thanks in advance

Joe,
Thanks for the reply. The reason why we switched from initial capacity = max capacity stratgey was because of the database issues that we encountered. There was significant DB proceses (resource) consumption although when only 1/4 of connections (in turn db resources) would have been sufficient. I fail to understand why the approach as specified in the current config is not working as desired. You have mentioned about a possibility of a bug. Can you please elaborate or point me to right documentation?
Also, why is the connection pool itself getting closed frequently (possibly every transaction)?
Please find the version detail below.
WebLogic Version:
WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR240904 11/17/2005 05:10:44 WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR241234 09/29/2005 12:17:41 WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR243498 12/22/2005 12:13:12 WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR247655 02/27/2006 13:50:13 WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR265510 03/06/2006 09:44:48 WebLogic Temporary Patch for CR263825 06/12/2006 12:10:52
WebLogic Integration 8.1 SP5 2006-02-03 16:08:38 EST Patch for CR258928
WebLogic Integration 8.1 SP5 2006-02-24 16:02:27 IST Patch for CR263528
WebLogic Server 8.1 SP5 Mon Sep 19 23:06:54 PDT 2005 641358
WebLogic XMLX Module 8.1 SP5 Mon Sep 19 23:06:54 PDT 2005 641358
WebLogic Server 8.1 SP5 Mon Sep 19 23:06:54 PDT 2005 641358
WebLogic Server 8.1 SP5 Mon Sep 19 23:06:54 PDT 2005 641358
WebLogic Integration 8.1 SP5 Wed Sep 21 21:56:54 PDT 2005 643163
Regards,
Pradeep
Edited by pranjana at 05/18/2007 2:27 PM

Calibrating Lowered Max Capacity

I had never calibrated my 1.5 year old Macbook Pro before. I checked the max capacity and it was at 97% of the 4600mAh design capacity. I followed the calibration instructions to a "T" and now it says the max is only 92%. What happened??

You're battery reading is more accurate. You didn't lose anything.

K8n neo2 hard drive max capacity problem

My 160 gig hard drive shows a max capacity of 33 gigs. I've read on the Western Digital support site that it's a Bios issue. I'm using the 1.1 bios.
When I try to reinstall the hd, i make the boot disk using the Data Lifeguard tools, but when i try to boot from either the floppy or even the cd itself, some informations shows up in dos while it's loading the program, but the program never actually starts. The HD has the Master jumper setting as it is the only hd on that IDE cable, my raptor is in sata port 3.
Any Ideas?

To get 48 bit addressing needed to access more than 128 GB, you need Windows XP SP1 or 2 or Windows 2000 SP3 or 4. You also have to add a registry entry - see
http://www.48bitlba.com/enablebiglba.htm or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;305098
I'm not sure why you don't see 128 GB unless you are using an older version of windows (is this the case?). I would expect any motherboard made in the last year, especially the Nforce 3 motherboard, to handle the 48-bit addressing. I would suggest checking the drive jumpering very carefully, noting as one of the other posters has indicated, that the WD drives are jumpered differently for master with slave or master by itself. Normally, I prefer to use Cable select with the 80 wire/40 pin ultra ata type cables. This way one can move drives around without changin the jumpers. Also, it is easy to tell which drive is the master (the one on the end of the cable).
Another solution is to use a Promise Ultra100 TX2 or equivalent controller. The promise driver handles the 48 bit addressing.
Robert

Max capacity of RAM for Satellite A100 PSAANH-04Y03F?

Hello,
I have finally decided to upgrade the ram from my A100 that I bought back in 2007.
The problem is that I don't how what the maximum capacity is.
I suspect that it is 2GB, but I'm curious about if it'll take 4GB.
The reason why I haven't found any information myself is because I have no clue what model my A100 is.
It says "Satellite A100 SYSTEM UNIT MODEL NO. *PSAANH-04Y03F*" on the bottom of the notebook.
Googling that gives me 0 search results :/
Help would be greatly appreciated!

What chipset has been built in the notebook?
The max RAM depends on the chipset.
You can use an tool like *Everest Home Edit* to check the chipset.
Then you could search for chipset properties.

Increase root partition on ufs filesystem

Hello
we have a virtual solaris vm with ufs the disk has become to small..
we have increased the vmfs but we are having problems increasing the filesystem as format only sees the old size.. fdisk does not seem to offer the possibility to expand the partition to its maximum size.. is it possible to change the label of a solaris partition so that it takes into account all the space that is available for it?
why fdisk does not see there is unallocated space.. i could create a second partition and mount it to other directory perhaps.
thank you.

Hi.
Solaris on X86 system placed on special general dos partittion.
fdisk - used for first level. On this level you can create one ( and only one) partition with type Solaris
and can create some additional partitions for other OS.
format - used for second level. It create additional partittions on solaris's partitions on first level. This label also store original size of disk.
So you need:
1. Increase Solaris partition on first level, using fdisk
2. Check that format detect new size of disk and increase/create new.
In case mistake on any steps - you lost data.
This problem correspond only for root fs and UFS.
On my choice - create addtional virtual disk and just add it to system.
For new disk use gpt (efi) type of label.
Regards.

HP G70-120EM - Memory Question - Max Capacity

Hi,
I have a HP G70-120EM laptop. I am looking to increase the memory capacity with a pair of matched modules, as big as possible.
Ive got:
1 x 1GB Hynix PC2-5300
1 x 2GB Transcend PC2-5300
667 MHz
Now, the specification says memory max = 3GB, but can be up to PC2-6400 800Mhz.
I suspect that this 3GB cap is due to the laptop coing with vista 32bit, but ive now installed Windows 7 64bit.
So, whats the max the laptop can handle?
Can it take 2 x 2GB or 2 x 4GB? Or is it really limited to 3GB?
Im looking to put as much as possible in there at the maximum speed of PC2-6400.
Thanks in advance.

Huffer, Thanks for the reply.
Ive managed to source a document through this website.
HP G70 Notebook PC
Compaq Presario CQ70 Notebook PC
Maintenance and Service Guide
Document Part Number: 485462-001
September 2008
In this document on page 8 it says
Supports dual-channel memory
Supports up to 4 GB of system memory
Supports PC2-6400, 800-MHz, DDR2 and
PC2-5300, 667-MHz, DDR2
So i think ive found the answer i was looking for yet, what you have said contradicts this. I was planning 2 x 2GB of 800mhz memory running in dual channel.
Have you tried this and it did not work or was you speculating?
I was going to pay £70 for the sticks today, but if you know that it is not going to work then ill simply grab another transcend 2GB 667 module and leave it at that.
Thanks a lot.

My (C:) drive went to nearly half the max capacity after complete factory restore.

So, about a month ago I recovered my notebook pc to factory defaults because of a strange issue that would not allow me to open up to the login screen. After recovery and the re-configuration of all my preferences and whatnot I noticed a few differences. The first thing I noticed is when I change volume or screen brightness via f2-3 and f9-10 I no longer get a screen apearance of the current level. But the second thing I noticed was that my pc memory unit now only had a capacity of 76 GB. I then used the manage computer option to find out how much my space should be. It does say 76 under (C but if I look down it says that the capacity of "Disk 0" is 284.07 GB. I am not sure what went wrong, but my only idea so far is that maybe my old files are still here somewhere on my pc. I did notice that when using the Xbox 360 network streaming ability I saw both my new file "Hayden-PC" and "Hayden-HP". Which immediately made me think that the files existed somewhere. This is a huge issue as my computer now gets slower much faster and I constantly have to go through and delete anything I don't need. Please repy as soon as possible.

@HaydenEvanoff,
Do you see a folder called windows.old on your C drive?
How was the recovery performed? List the specific steps and what media, if any, was used. I suspect you are correct in that the old Windows installation is still present, but this should not be the case if an official HP recovery was performed.
What is the exact model and product number of the unit?
NOTE: Do not provide the serial number.
Also, provide a screen shot of what disk management shows as well. This may provide some insight.
Go to Start, right-click Computer, and select manage.
Select Disk Management and maximize the window to show all it has. Windowed mode may cut off parts of it.
Take a screenshot of this and upload it in your next post. This can be done in the reply window by clicking the image icon and selecting browse. Be sure to chose the largest option for it.
↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

Max capacity for sd card slot Mac Mini mid 2010

Has anyone with a MAC Mini mid 2010 tried using the SD card slot for an extended drive? I'm wondering what the max size is for the slot, and if I put a 64-128 gig SD Card in, would OS X 10.8.2 be able to combine that with an internal HD to create a "fusion drive"?

Your Mid 2010 Mac mini doesn't support SDXC, so you can't use this type of cards. Fusion Drive needs an SSD and a hard drive on the same Mac mini, so an SD won't work with this

Harddrive max capacity has decreased after reinstalling OSX

I recently deleted my harddrive using the disk utility that came with my macbook. I then created a new partition in hopes of reinstalling the OS except that the maximum size availble for my partition is now 110gb when before it was at 120gb
What happened? How do I fix this?
Any help appreciated.

Nothing really magical about it. I'm impressed you're impressed but there really isn't much about which to be impressed. Impressing, isn't it?
Computers only can count in binary or Base 2. So on the computer 1 Gb is 1,024^3 or 1,073,741,824 bytes. Drive mfgrs. use Base 10 arithmetic so their 1 GB is 1,000,000,000. As you can see dividing the first by the second indicates a difference of just around 7%. This means that a 120 GB drive capacity in Base 10 translates to a 111 GB drive in Base 2. Either way the amount of storage is the same. The latter, however, more accurately reflects how the computer is keeping track. Under the hood it's always Base 2.

Max capacity of ufs filesystem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for