Max. disk size in A1000?

Hi,
Does anybody know what the max. disk size is that works in a A1000 array? We have so far used 76GB disks in an 8 slot A1000.
Thanks

Hello Erwin,
SCSI is less limited than IDE. The next bigger size should work.
The Seagate ST3146707LC (146.8GB - 10000 RPM Ultra-320) and Fujitsu MAT3147NC (146.8GB - 10000 RPM Ultra-320) are listed as compatible.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/A1000/component s.html#Disks
Michael

Similar Messages

D1000 Max Disk Size

I have found conflicting information. I am hoping one if the experts here can help. I am trying to find out what the max disk size is for the D1000's. The handbook says 73GB but the sunstore sells 146GB drives that are for the D1000. So which is it? I don't want to buy 12 x 146GB drives to find they won't work in that configuration.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/D1000/component s.html#Disks
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/Systems/D1000/D1000.htm l
Thanks!

Hello Andrew,
the 146GB disks are listed in the <b>Full Components List</b> (your first link). If you order the disks from Sun, you can confirm that information.
While the disks work in the D1000, you should keep in mind that the disk array is attached with Ultra40 and these disks are Ultra320. The disks are capable of a much higher transfer rate than the connection can support.
Michael

Max Disk Size on Solaris 8

I have applied the Recommended Patch Cluster to my Solaris 8 (6/00) Ultra 10 System, but Format still sees only 30G off my 100G IDE Slave Device. Pls let me know if there are any other patches to apply for the full HD size to be seen.
thanks
Jay

hello, I will check the Jumper Settings, which I think is set as slave. But have no idea how to do the delete vtoc and re-label. Can you please provide the instructions for these?
thanks
Jay

Max Disk Size Recognized ??

I have a 160 Gb disk, but Disk Utility only recognizes it at 128 Gb. Is there a way I can get the system to recognize all of the disk capacity? Thanks.

That seems like it's not seeing all of it. At first I was going to tell you that you will not get all of the 160. But only 128 is a bit much.
I have 4 hard drives in my G4.
They are:
2 120 Gig (111.8 and 114.5 seen).
2 250 Gig (233.8 seen on both).
Is this your primary drive? if not, can you backup your files and try erasing and partitioning it?
If you can't do this, try calling AppleCare if your computer is still under warranty.

Is there a max SATA disk size in OSX 10.4.11 and G4/1.25?

Hello,
I am trying to set up a G4/1.25 (2 gig in memory) as a fileserver with a SATA card and 2 x 3 TB seagate disks. This is the setup:
http://lowendmac.com/ppc/mdd-power-mac-g4-1.25-ghz.html
http://firmtek.com/seritek/seritek-1v4/
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/ST3000DM001/
The system is OSX 10.4.11. I am unable to initialize the disks in disk utility. The process starts but then halts and says that it can not continue.
My question is if there is a max disk size in OSX 10.4.11?
Any help greatly appriceated.
Best regards,
Ingolfur Bruun

Hello again,
I tried to work my way around armed with your input and succeeded
By using a FireWire dock I was able to see the disks in 10.4.11. What I did was to partition the disks with ONE partition in Disk Utility and then format with GUID partitioning scheme instead of the Apple Partition Mapping scheme which I had done before. And as I am using a ATA disk as a startup disk it dosen't matter if the 3 TB disks are not bootable. They will only be used for data, not as system disks.
You saved my day! Thanks again.
Best regards,
Ingolfur

MS 6147 max memory and disk sizes

For the MS 6147 can anybody confirm the max Hard disk size and max memory.
It will not recognise the 40Gb HD I am trying to fit, and only recognises half of the 256Mb memeory simm I have fitted.
The BIOS version is 1.9 but I think that is a 'special' by Packard Bell. The MSI BIOS download site makes no mention of disk problems rectified right up to V1.8 which is the latest, with the exception of one for the ZX chipset only which addresses EDMA 66 problem.
Anybody got a definitive answer on this?

Supports a maximum memory size of 256MB (8M x 8) or
512MB (16M x 4) registered DIMM only
how many chips on dimm is what counts with older boards
go to drive makers web site get jumper settings to limit it to 32gb and try

Need info about max HDD size available for Satellite Pro M30-813

Hello,
The following question is mainly to be addressed to authorized Toshiba support personnel. What exactly is the limitation of a maximum size of an internal HDD that I could use with my Satellite Pro M30-813?
Recently, I have bought and installed seagate 160 GB SATA drive, onto which I have successfully installed WXP Pro and have been running it for quite a while with no problems. Recently, I have been copying large amount of data from an external hard drive to my new internal disk, and as the files were being copied as I noticed having about 50 GB free space left, I had experienced windows "delayed write failed" and a massive partition failure with no possibility to recover data. The system would no longer boot and the whole MBR was damaged. As the result, I have lost all data on my new disk.
Although, I realize that Toshiba is not responsible for additional hardware that I use with my laptop and that is not officially supported by Toshiba, I am certain that as an end user of a Toshiba product I have the right to know about a max HDD size limitation information for my notebook model. Therefore, I request Toshiba technical support representative to give me a straight official answer to my question.
Thank you in advance,
Andrejs
(You may also contact me privately at my e-mail address)

Hi Andrew
> The following question is mainly to be addressed to authorized Toshiba support personnel
I think you are in the wrong area if you are looking for an answer from an authorized Toshiba support.
This is a Toshiba user-to-user forum! You will meet here Toshiba notebook owner and enthusiasts who share knowledge and tries solve problems but nobody from Tosh :(
I could provide my experience with the M30 Satellite and the HDD upgrade possibilities.
In my knowledge the Sat M30 supports a 40GB, 60GB and 80GB HDD for sure.
In my opinion you could use the 100GB HDD but bigger HDDs will not run and functions correctly.
So switch to a lower HDD size and enjoy the notebook!
Ive goggled a little bit and found compatible HDD and the part numbers
HITACHI GBC000Z810 -> 80GB
HITACHI GBC00014810 -> 80GB
TOSHIBA HDD2188B -> 80GB
HITACHI G8C0000Z610 -> 60GB
HITACHI G8BC00013610 -> 60GB
TOSHIBA HDD2183 -> 60GB
TOSHIBA HDD2184 -> 60GB
I hope this could help you a little bit!
Best regards

I'm using DVD Studio pro to burn a dvd but it won't let me cause I keep getting a "Formatting Failed" error message. It says "Formatting was not successful. Layer 0 exceeds max layer size allowed. Choose a suitable marker location." What does this mean?

I'm using DVD Studio pro to burn a dvd but it won't let me cause I keep getting a "Formatting Failed" error message. It says "Formatting was not successful. Layer 0 exceeds max layer size allowed. Choose a suitable marker location that will support this condition." What does this mean?
Kris

It means your file is too large to fit on a single layer disk.
Recompress to keep the overall size (audio,video and menus) below 4.5GB
x

WRT350N USB Drive Max File Size?

What is the max. file size for the FAT32 USB Drive when attached to a WRT350N? When I try to transfer a 11.7 GB file to the Drive, the drive "disconnects" after 3.8GB has been transfered. [Transfer status window shows 7.9 GB remaining to be transfered a the time of disconnect.] I've tried both the Mapped Network drive and the FTP Sever approaches and get the same results every time. All smaller files transfer to the WRT350N USB Drive successfully every time. I using a Windows Vista Ultimate desktop (Wired connection) and the Router has 1.3.02 frimware.
The symptoms tend to indicate that the max. file size is limited to 4GB? Is this correct?

You will have to format your disk with the help of the WRT350N and after that you will have creat Share with same "Storage" tab on the linksys router.

Disk size in Solaris 10

I have some confusion about disk subsystem in Solaris, i am trying to clarify from this forum.
I have recently installed Solaris 10 in one SPARC box. After i installed, the format gives the bellow output.
0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
From the above output, is the size of my disk is 14 GB ?, or the size of my disk is 14+2+5=21 GB ?
I am trying to learn ZFS, so i want another partition in this disk so that i create ZFS on that partition.
I have gone to single user mode by using CD. I assumed that, from the above "format" command output, i thought i have 21GB of disk size and 14GB of free space. So i created another partition with 14GB. Now the format command gives bellow output.
0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
3 reserved wm 0 - 29127 14.00GB (29128/0/0) 29361024
When i am creating ZFS, it given me a warning that the the partition i have specified is spanned into root partition (first partition), and it mentioned to use "-f" option.
With "-f", it created successfully.
If i assume now that the size of my disk is 14GB only then,
(1) how come two partitions are pointing to the same area in the disk ?
(2) How come two different filesystems are pointing to the same area ?
Please anyone clarify my doubts. Thank you.

Assuming a standard labeled disk it is standrad practice to have section/slice 2 being 'whole disk' for purposes of 'backup'. That would tend to indicate you have a 14GB disk. A prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c?t?d?s2 (change the ?s to the right values) will give a little more on the disk geometry.
In the display from format column 4 is the start cylinder of the partition and column 5 is the end cylinder. From the first set out output it looks like cyclinders 4063 to 19490 are not allocated
In the second set you have created a new slice (section 3) that overlaps both sections 0 and 1 - which is generally considered to be bad!

Sophos AV max scanning size / timeout

Hi,
I haven't found any changeable settings for max. scanning size or scanning timeout on a S160 v7.1.3 with Sophos AV.
In the GUI under "Security Services-->Anti-Maleware" it shows "Object Scanning Limits: Max. Object Size: 32 MB".
I'm not able to change it. This parameter seems not to belong to the Sophos AV.
I can change it only after enableing Webroot or McAfee first.
The CLI has no commands for adjusting AV settings.
How can I control the max. scanning size or scanning timeout with Sophos-AV?
Has it fixed values for it?
Does anyone have an idea, how it works?
Kind regards,
Manfred

With administrator rights, the value should be editable. The object size is applied to all scanners which have been licensed and enabled on the appliance.
~Tim

"max-pool-size" what is it good for?

SCreator simple CRUD use:
After a while I get:
" Error in allocating a connection. Cause: In-use connections equal max-pool-size and expired max-wait-time. Cannot allocate more connection"
Which is odd, because its just me using the server/database. It looks like every tiime I run a test, another conection is lost.
Do I have to restart the server? Is there a way to say "its only me, reuse a single connection"
why does "connection pooling" make life harder?
Can I turn it of?
cheers
cts

I got the same error in my JSC project. I search for few days and i found the solution. I do a mistake in my page Navigation. I forgot a slash in <to-view-id>.
A bad example:
<navigation-rule>
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
A good example:
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
with this mistake, the afterRenderedResponse() was never called, and the ResultRowSet was never closed.
Korbben.

SharePoint - Error_1_Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was rea

Hi,
I am Shanmugavel, SharePoint developer,
I am facing the below SharePoint 2013 deployment issue while deploying using VS2012.
If i will deploy the same wsp or existing wsp
(last build) using direct powershell deployment, the solution adding properly, but the same timeout exception coming while activation the features. Please find the below error.
I tried the below activists:
1. Restarted my dev server, DB server.
2. tried the same solution id different server
3. tried existing wsp file (last build version)
4. Deactivated all the features, including project Active deployment configuration.... but still i am facing the same issue.
I hope this is not coding level issue, because still my code is not start running, before that some problem coming.
Please help me any one..... Last two days i am struck because of this...

What you need to understand is the installation of a WSP does not do much. It just makes sure that you relevant solution files are deployed to the SharePoint farm.
Next comes the point when you activate the features. It is when the code which you have written to "Activate" certain features for your custom solution.
Regarding the error you are getting, it typically means that you have more connections (default is I guess 100) open for a SQL database then you are allowed to.
If you have a custom database and you are opening a connection, make sure you close it as well.
Look at the similar discussion here:
The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool
size was reached[^]
I would suggest further to look at the
ULS logs[^] to get better insight.
Manas Bhardwaj's Stream : www.manasbhardwaj.net

MacBook in target disk mode shows incorrect disk size

My 80 GB hard drive in MacBook has gone bad (the filesystem is in inconsistent state). I connected it to an iMac in Target Disk Mode. It shows up (unmounted) but the capacity reported by Disk Utility is 20 GB. Does someone know why is that? Is it due to the corrupt filesystem?
I am afraid that given this situation, if I buy and run DiskWarrior, that too might not be able to see the full disk and fail to repair it. Note that if I boot my MacBook using the Apple CD, the Disk Utility shows the correct disk size.
Thanks.

If you have a disk that is in really, really bad shape to the point that Disk Utility looks at you like a 5 year old that just spilled a glass of apple juice on the kitchen floor, it's time to bring in the big guns.
DiskWarrior.
I love it, I love it. If someone has something bad to say about it, they are lying. If there is a chance that you can get everything back to normal without spending the huge dough to send your drive out to be dismantled in a clean room, DiskWarrior is that chance.
It's worth every single penny.
Let me know if you have other queries.

Re-read disk size in Solaris 10 x86 / VMware

Hi
Using
# uname -a
SunOS host1 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc
We have a 30G virtual disk, on top of which a UFS filesystem is living, mounted, and used.
The Virtual disk has been resized to 40G.
I know I need to change the fdisk partition size, after which i can change the "format" partition size, then use growfs.
But I don't know how to get S10 to recognise the new size for the disk.
fdisk tells me
Total disk size is 3916 cylinders
Cylinder size is 16065 (512 byte) blocks
Cylinders
Partition   Status
Type
Start   End   Length
=========   ======
============ =====   ===   ======   ===
1
Active
Solaris2
1 3915
3915
100
# prtvtoc -h /dev/dsk/c1t2d0s2
       0      0    00      16065 62846280 62862344   /xxx
       2      5    01          0 62862345 62862344
       8      1    01          0     16065     16064
# df -h /xxx
Filesystem             size   used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t2d0s0       30G    29G   498M    99%    /xxx
On Linux I might use partprobe or blockdev --rereadpt but on Solaris?
Cheers
KM

Hello
this document should help, but make a backkup before running it
How to expand a UFS Lun in Solaris 10 (Doc ID 1451858.1)
Regards
Eze

Max. disk size in A1000?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for