Max no of 100 communcations exceeded EP 7.0 NW 2004s SP14
Hi Experts,
Today we were experiencing a typical error on our portal while accessing one of our backend BW system.
The error read as
Connect to SAP Gateway failed
LOCATION CPIC(TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode
ERROR max no of 100 communications execeeded.
MODULE r3cpic_mt.c
We tested the connection of the RFC destination from the BW system and it also brought up the same error.
The same was resolved only after restarting the corresponding portal server node.
1.What is exact cause of this problem?
2.Where is the value for this max no of communication set in Portal?
3.How can we avoid this problem in future?
4.Any document or note which tells in detail about the communication between portal and backend sytems.
Thanks,
Jimmy
Hi Bala,
Sorry for the delay in reply.
So what you say is that the problem lies in the backend system i.e. our BW system and we need to change parameter on this system.
But I have note that the parameter disp/max_comm_entries and rdisp/max_arq both have current value 2000 on our BW system.
Can you please explain that how this CPIC conversations between a backend SAP system and SAP portal works?
Thanks,
Jimmy
Similar Messages
-
Broadcast - ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded
We've scheduled 3 reports to email PDF's to approx 400 users but the BEx broadcaster only managed to send out about 80 emails. in the various logs and traces I can see and error that states "ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded".
I can find various notes about this refering to various sytstem parameters but as far as I can tell our parametrs are set correctly e.g.
gw/max_conn 500
gw/max_sys 300
gw/max_overflow_size 10000000
gw/max_shm_req 50
rdisp/tm_max_no 200
rdisp/max_comm_entries 500
As I understand it from the notes we should increase the environment variable CPIC_MAX_CONV. However the note I'm looking at (316877) states that this environment variable is on the ITS server but from talking to our Basis support the version of netweaver we are running doesnt have an ITS server?? Dont really know what all that means. Any ideas on that one or about the error message as a whole would be greatly appreciated.
If it's any help I can also see in SM21 that at the time of broadcasting the users got the error:
> Conversation ID: 33568780
> CPI-C function: CMSEND(SAP)
Communication error, CPIC return code 017, SAP return code 450
Thren in the broadcast log via RSRD_LOG the users have the error:
Java communication error: Error when opening an RFC connection RSBOLAP017
ThanksHi,
Try using these threads, if you get some help from them.
/thread/174978 [original link is broken]
RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION--max no of 100 conversation exceeded
AI_DIRECTORY_JCOSERVER - ConnTest issue Error "max no of 100 conversation" -
Max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL
Hi All,
There are more than 4000 messages in SMQ2 Tcode and when we checked the SLDCHECK we got this error-:
RFC ping returned exception with message:
max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=17 thRc=45
After increasing the value for parameter CPIC_MAX_CONV 1000 it started working but after 1 min SLDCHECK again gave the same error.
We have already checked and implemented the SAP Note :316877.
I have one doubt this Note says that CPIC_MAX_CONV value should be 5000,is it really required?
I have checked the SLDCHECK with value 1000 for CPIC_MAX_CONV .
Pls suggest the solution.
Regards,
Prashant
Edited by: Prashant Shukla on Jan 27, 2009 12:50 PMCPIC_MAX_CONV value should be 5000,is it really required?
No, this is not mandatory. You should set it as per the load on your system.
What is the error when you perform SLDCHECK?
Regards,
Prateek -
Error in Portal "max no of 100 conversaction exceed" while getting 2 backnd
hi experts
i am getting following Error
RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: connect to SAP Gateway failed
Max no of 100 conversaction exceed.
please suggst me the needful??
is this JCO-Destination error? or some thing Else??
Thanks
narpalHi Narpal,
By default Portal allows 100 simultaneous instant messaging sessions. But this number can be increased.
Navigate to
System Administration -> System Configuration -> Collaboration -> Real Time Collaboration (RTC) -> RTC Engine -> RTCEngine
- Switch to Advanced Mode
- Modify MaximumChatSessions parameter and set to 500
- Restart the Portal Server
The problem should be resolved then.
Regards,
Sudip -
CPIC_MAX_CONV - ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded
I recvd the "ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded" and I could resolve it by setting the environment variable CPIC_MAX_CONV to a higher value for my <sid>adm per note 316877.
What I want to know is where can i check to see if this environment variable actually took effect WITHIN IN SAP (I can see it set in env and when I echo the variable) ? Can I see this anywhere within the SAP land ... in its server logs , property files etc ?
Also in general when we make changes to environment variables at the OS level pertinent to SAP then where within SAP does this get absorbed and where I can see the new values.
Pls advise.
thank you
regards
LaxmiHi Laxmi,
Please check the below thread. I have given a possible solution in the thread.
Tcode SLDCHECK error
Cheers...,
Raghu -
ERROR:max no of 100 conversations exceeded
Dear All,
I m tring to comfigure SAP XI(2004sr2) in 2nd step of SLD system : Connect SLD TO SEN (if CEN Present). I m getting following error
Element 'BAPI_SLD_SUPPLIER_CONFIG_SET':Connect to SAP gateway failed
Connect_PM TYPE=A ASHOST=XIDEV SYSNR=00 GWHOST=XIDEV GWSERV=sapgw00 PCS=1
LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode
ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded
TIME Fri May 08 14:58:46 2009
RELEASE 700
COMPONENT CPIC (TCP/IP) with Unicode
VERSION 3
RC 466
MODULE r3cpic.c
LINE 10713
COUNTER 1
Element 'SAPDEMO.XID.Backend.Unclassified':!AbapConfigurationWriter.FM_CALL!BAPI_SLD_SUPPLIER_CONFIG_SET!AbapConfigurationWriter.FAILED!
Regards,
HitenHi Hiten,
Make sure that you have set the parameter CPIC_MAX_CONV under Environment variables --> system Variables.
For XI, the recommended value for this parameter is 400.
Regards,
Gopinathan. -
URGENT : "max no of 100 conversations exceeded".
Hi.
We developed RFC Java iView for SAP R/3.
This iview connect SAP R/3 and call RFC FM in SAP R/3.
We got connection error during high load.
Error is
"max no of 100 conversations exceeded".
So, I checked SAPFactory properties using Visual Admin but I think we got enough conenction.
Here is parameter.
Expiration : Checked
Connection Lifetime : 2
Maximum Connections : 1000
Cleanup Thread : 10
Maximum Time to wait for connection : 4
JEE System has below error :
#1.5#000F203CC23C002000007C33000050550004145E2C7DAE0A#1148294628636#/System/Server#sap.com/irj#com.sap.portal.connectors.R3#rtst018#54224##hhie01_E01_4224450#rtst018#d888e6e0e97f11da9210000f203cc23c#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_7##0#0#Error#1#com.sap.portal.connectors.R3#Plain###(R3/BW) Failed to get connection. Please contact your admin. #
#1.5#000F203CC23C00110000883F000050550004145E2C7DB625#1148294628638#/System/Server#sap.com/irj#com.sap.portal.connectors.R3#rtst417#54127####d9c05570e97f11dab72a000f203cc23c#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_16##0#0#Error#1#com.sap.portal.connectors.R3#Plain###(R3/BW) Failed to get connection. Please contact your admin. #
How can fix this problem ?
Regards, Arnold.Hi Arnold
When The external RFC/CPIC server cannot open any additioanl connections than u get
"ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded"
By setting the environment variables CPIC_MAX_CONV the library can manage more parallel connections
If an RFC server program registers with, for example, 100 threads at the R/3 gateway, 100 connections are initially kept in the server program. Every RFC running on this type of connection creates an additional entry in the connection list of the RFC server program. This means that, under full load, a maximum of 200 entries are possible.
I have not sure idea about "Maximum Connections" properties for SAPFactory in Connect Service
regards,
kaushal -
"SYSTEM FAILURE" during JCo call. max no of 100 conversations exceeded
Hi Experts,
My scernario is : RFC->File Asynch
When i do testing this scenario in Configuration (ID) -> tools-> test configuration I got below error.
Interface Mapping
Runtime error
"SYSTEM FAILURE" during JCo call. max no of 100 conversations exceeded / CPIC-CALL: 'ThSAPCMRCV' : cmRc=17 thRc=45
1) I have created incremented 100 to 300: Set the following environment variable CPIC_MAX_CONV=300
2) In sender RFC communication channel i have all correct parameters like: gateway service,Program ID, client number, password, userid etc
Pleas help me out.
thanks
siva grandhihi,
se this
/thread/174978 [original link is broken]
Look at SAP note 314530,316877
set this enviroment Variables:
set CPIC_MAX_CONV = 500 (WINDOWS)
setenv CPIC_MAX_CONV 500 (unix)
also check the rfc destination JCO_RUNTIME_JCOSERVER
AI_RUNTIME_JCOSERVER. if u have any error in this RFC plz refer to this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9b/da0f41026df223e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Thanks
Rodrigo
ps:reward points if useful
Edited by: Rodrigo Pertierra on Mar 26, 2008 11:59 AM -
Max no of 100 conversations exceeded
Hello VC Experts,
I have developped a big VC application. within this there are included a lot of rfc call and functions.
sometimes it happens that the model break down because of the message above.
Does anybody know a solution except a redesign to end unnecessary rfc connections ?
I have already read sap note 314530 for searching a solution.
Thank you for help in advance.
UweHi Uwe,
I read note 314530. That means that you have a lot of RFCs which have over 200 Threads. Have you tried out to split your application in several nested iViews and put it together in one iView, so that not every RFC is active?
I never had this problem, so I have no solution for you, it's only a speculation with the nested iviews.
Best Regards,
marcel -
Clarification about parameters to be changed for max no of 100 conv excd
Hi,
In our system we had received the error:
Connect to SAP gateway failed
Connect_PM TYPE=B MSHOST=xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GROUP=PUBLIC R3NAME=xxx MSSERV=sapmsXXX PCS=1
LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host
ERROR max no of 100 conversations exceeded
due to which some users were unable to work in the system.
The threads that i have found while searching on the topic have suggested changing the parameter CPIC_MAX_CONV=500 (or greater) as per the note 314530.
And as mentioned in the SAP note 316877:
" Reduce ~timeout on the ITS machine to enforce the automatic termination of unused sessions."
Now in SMGW i can see the "Active Connections" (first page of the transaction) and also the drop down option "logged on clients" which gives another list.
I am now trying to understand which timeout parameter controls which list.
Most of the entries in the Active connections list are from the TP jlaunch (and seem to be coming from the java stack of the same system). And most of the entries in the Logged on clients list are from the TP SAPSLDAPI.
I need to know which timeout parameter (as per note 316877) needs to be changed for the problem being faced.
Or have i misunderstood this ~timeout parameter and it should be set in Windows environment similar to the CPIC_MAX_CONV parameter ?
Regards,
Rohan.Hi,
Thanks for your responses.
I will be changing the CPIC_MAX_CONV parameter.
But I would still like to clarify about the other parameter : "~Timeout"
and be prepared to take action on this as well.
As per the (conflicting) information I have so far this seems to be some parameter that is to be maintained in each individual service in SICF ?
Or do we have any synonymous itsp* or gw* parameter which I can set for the timeout?
Regards,
Rohan. -
AI_DIRECTORY_JCOSERVER - ConnTest issue Error "max no of 100 conversation"
I have a XI System (TXT)sitting on the WAS 640. Now the above mentioned RFC Connection (SM59) gives me an error saying "max no of 100 conversation". I searched on for this and found a SAP Note No. 316877. In the SAP Note which speakes abt Maximum Number of Converstion exceeded suggests to set the value for the CPIP_MAX_CONV variable to more than 100. I have kept the value 1000(One thousand) then too I am facing the same eror.
Apart from this there is a very strange thing that I have been noticed. In The TXT( XI System) if we go to the user list i.e. to T-Code SM04 then their are about 45 entries for the user XIRWBUSER.
Incase if I lock the user XIRWBUSER and then restart the Instance then I do not face any such poblems and also my AI_DIRECTORY_JCOSERVER Connection problem gets resolved. But This is not the solution , as I will be requireing the RWB user in my XI System for one or thjer other processes.
Kindly guide me in this case.
Regards,
Premkishan ChourasiaHello Vijaya,
Thanks a lot for your useful info.
I read the SAP Note 887880 and implemented the recommeded correction. My system is working fine now.
Thanks again to you.
Regards,
Premkishan Chourasia -
Max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface
According to CCO as following text, the remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic. I want to know why cisco choose 25 percent. why not 30% or 20%?
If I config the max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface, does it will effect the routing protocol? also effect the network conectivity?
thanks for your answer
=======
Usage Guidelines for max-reserved-bandwidth
The sum of all bandwidth allocation on an interface should not exceed 75 percent of the available bandwidth on an interface. The remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic.
If you need to allocate more than 75 percent for RSVP, CBWFQ, LLQ, IP RTP Priority, Frame Relay IP RTP Priority, and Frame Relay PIPQ, you can use the max-reserved-bandwidth command. The percent argument specifies the maximum percentage of the total interface bandwidth that can be used.
If you do use the max-reserved-bandwidth command, make sure that not too much bandwidth is taken away from best-effort and control traffic.
The max-reserved-bandwidth command is intended for use on main interfaces only; it has no effect on virtual circuits (VCs) or ATM permanent virtual circuits (PVCs).Kevin,
this is the wrong group for this question.
Gilles. -
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)
Hello,
In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
Status before error started
I have already gone through notes 1757252
But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
DEV_DISP
Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c 8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c 6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER tid 59 wp_ca_blk -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1 type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE mode 0 len 0 rq_id 24366
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c 8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c 6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER tid 59 wp_ca_blk -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1 type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE mode 0 len 0 rq_id 24502
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c 8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c 6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER tid 59 wp_ca_blk -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1 type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE mode 0 len 0 rq_id 24691
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
sm21:
Q0 G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
work process trace
please check the image
Thanks
ShradhaHello Divyanshu
It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
Parameters
Current
Changed
rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
2400
SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
isp/max_vm_priv_no
3
SERVLET=3, RFC=3
rdisp/max_priv_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
1000
1058
Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
300
1058
Work Process Communication Blocks
vmcj/option/ps
960M
1460M
poolsize for the VMC
vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
90
70
VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
64
128
max. vm heap
rdisp/keepalive
1200
3600
Timer for check of unused connections
rdisp/keepalive_timeout
60
150
Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
rdisp/wppriv_max_no
DEFAULT
16
Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode -
ERROR max no of cpic clients exceeded (2000)
Hi all,
We are the error max no. of CPIC clients exceeded (2000) when logging through ESS Portal
Please help me to resolve this soon.
Regards,
KalyanHello Kalyan,
you will have Increase the value of the gw/max_sys parameter in the backend system
Refer to Notes 314530 and 894100 and you will be able to solve the issue
Let me know of any questions
Rohit -
Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client
WISMS on ver 6.0.196
Receiving several hundred messages:
*Jul 06 16:51:58.943: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:19:88:05:2d:53
*Jul 06 16:51:57.792: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M5 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:40:9d:3a:c9:8f
*Jul 06 16:51:56.991: %DOT1X-3-MAX_EAPOL_KEY_RETRANS: 1x_ptsm.c:407 Max EAPOL-key M1 retransmissions exceeded for client 00:19:88:06:64:82
Any thoughts? Wireless users are experiencing random disconnects.In looking at the radius configuration again I notice that we have two servers defined. I looked through the logs and didn't see anything alarming, until I checked the secondary radius server. I was just told that the second radius server has been shutdown without notice.
I will remove that from the WLAN config later tonight.
Obvious question, but will ask it anyway, will this cause these errors?
Maybe you are looking for
-
Audio Glitches on Timeline, but not when played in QT?
I had a client send me his project on a harddrive. They exported a .mov file from FCP and it has no audio glitches when played with Quicktime. But if i drag that file to a timeline and watch it through my DSR-25 to a NTSC monitor, it has audio glitch
-
How do I get Firefix to remember my new password for Facebook?
When I first signed up for Facebook, Firefox asked if I wanted it to remember my password. I said yes. Now that I had to change my password when I sign it my old one comes up and I have to re-type my new one in each time.
-
IChat and 10.4.3
Has anyone heard or seen what the forthcoming OS 10.4.3 update will do for iChat?
-
Use of Apple TV in a Mixed network
I have my Apple TV connected to the network via an ethernet connection. I have my laptop connected to the same network wirelessly. Should Apple TV be able to see my iTunes library on my laptop? * if both Apple TV and Laptop are connected wirelessy,
-
HDR Photography to the iTouch 4g?
I heard that HDR (high dynamic range) photography would be added to iPhone's camera settings. Will this feature also be added to the itouch? On the website it says: "Take great photos that capture a wider range of light intensity using the new high d