Max. number of contracts in Re-Fx real estate ?

Hi everybody,
I´m facing a task of which I´m not sure that Re-Fx can deal with.
Is it possible to create up to 2.000.000 contracts in SAP real estate (4.7 Ext. 2.0) ?
I´ve never worked with these dimensions before but experienced some severe problems regarding a rapidly increasing number of conditions per contract, so that I´m a bit wary.
As I did not find anything on the recommendations of sap regarding this toppic, I hope you can help me.
Ute

Hi Ute,
you should calculate the sizing  (SAPS) for such a number of contracts. See note 915080.
Based on this you will be able to estimate your hardware and your possible performance.
I have done this exersice for a similar number of contracts focused on service charge settlement. And the hardware requirements have been tremendous.
Best Regards
Karl

Similar Messages

  • Real-time 8.6 Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses- with no connection​s

    I've been using the remote panel right along with no problems to connect to my Compact Fieldpoint.  This morning I accidently opened the connection twice on the same computer and tripped the "Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses" error.  Now it will not let me connect anymore from my computer.  I've tried clearing cookies, cache and history in Internet Explorer and rebooting my computer.  I've fired up the Remote Panel Connection Manager which shows no connections, and the NI License Information window does not show any connections which have been denied due to max # of clients being exceeded.  Is there a way to reset this without having to reboot my RT controller?  I'm running RT8.6 and LV 8.6 Full Dev System and understanding that it should come with 1 remote panel license. 
    Thanks
    maat
    LV2014

    The boss wanted to see an updated feature, so I was forced to deploy a new version and reboot.  Problem went away as I suspected it would. 
    I did manage to make the same mistake again this morning (launch the remote panel in 2 different MSIE windows) and after closing them both I could reconnect.  Must be a glitch or a bug?  It'd be interesting to see if anyone else has this problem.  For now...solved, but it would be nice to see a way to fix this without rebooting.
    Message Edited by maat on 10-22-2008 10:10 AM
    maat
    LV2014

  • Max number of part appraiser allowed for a 360d appraisal

    Hi, experts,
    i am trying to implement a 360 degree appraisal using OSA framework(part appraisal).
    according to F1 help:
    If you have selected only the Part Appraiser (PAPP) and/or Importance
    Part Appraisal (PWGT) columns in an appraisal template, this is a 360°
    appraisal, and the SAP system does not restrict the number of part
    appraisers allowed.
    in my template, only have PAPP column , but the maximun number of part appraisers allowed is still set to 18. what's wrong? it should be no limit.
    i tried to create a document(using phap_create_pa) , the 18 limitation stop me to add more part appraiser.
    i am so confused, does that mean we can not have a REAL 360 appraisal without limitation for part appraiser?
    thanks and best regards.
    Jun

    hi,
    i traced into the program,  in funciton module
    HRHAP_0DOC_MAX_NO_PART_APPER
    it's quite clear, there is no special logic for 360 appraisal , the formula is always set to :
        no_of_part_appraisers = ( c_column_max_number - l_total_columns )
                                DIV l_part_columns.
    so i think it's not possible to use OSA to depict an REAL 360 appraisal without maximum appraiser limitation.
    the maxi number is (18 -1) / 1 = 17
    which is really a pitty...
    br.
    zj

  • DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

    Hello,
    In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
    Status before error started
    I have already gone through notes 1757252
    But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and  rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
    I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
    DEV_DISP
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
    DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
    DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat  NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24366
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat  NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24502
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24691
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    sm21:
    Q0  G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
    work process trace
    please check the image
    Thanks
    Shradha

    Hello Divyanshu
    It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
    And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
    But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
    Parameters
    Current
    Changed
    rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
    2400
    SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
    isp/max_vm_priv_no
    3
    SERVLET=3, RFC=3
    rdisp/max_priv_time
    600
    3600
    Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
    rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
    600
    3600
    Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
    rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
    1000
    1058
    Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
    rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
    300
    1058
    Work Process Communication Blocks
    vmcj/option/ps
    960M
    1460M
    poolsize for the VMC
    vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
    90
    70
    VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
    vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
    64
    128
    max. vm heap
    rdisp/keepalive
    1200
    3600
    Timer for check of unused connections
    rdisp/keepalive_timeout
    60
    150
    Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
    rdisp/wppriv_max_no
    DEFAULT
    16
    Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode

  • Maximum allowable number of Contract Account per BP or Contracts per CA?

    I would like to find out what is maximum number of contract account that one can create under one business partner.
    What is the maximum number of contracts that are allowed under single contract account
    How many contract account or contract can the CIC0 screen handle for one business partner (maximum)
    Thank you in advance for your input.

    Tsmash:
    For Bp to CA relation, there is no technical maximum from a data model perspective.  CIC0 has a max display of 100 - this is to prevent delays in pulling up the data.  Generally, ths should never be an issue - maybe only with certain few large customers, but those might not be processed using CIC0.  Proper searching can mitigate this even for partners with >100 accounts.
    For contracts, again this depends on your data mode - but there is no technical  maximum enforced by the system during contract creation.  There is a consideration for billing/invoicing - if more than 5000 contracts are billed under one account, then there will be an invoice split due to internal line item maximum.  With CIC0 limits, proper searching can mitigate this even for accounts with >100 contracts.
    For customers with large numbers of accounts or contracts, consider using collective accounts.
    regards,
    bill.
    Edited by: William Eastman on Nov 10, 2009 10:02 PM

  • Classic Real Estate - General Contracts.

    Hello, SDN Gurus.
    We are implementing Classic Real Estate, in our company.
    We have a number of Partners, who have a differente number of rental Units, that we wanted to associated under the same General Contract.
    So, we'´ve created 2 Rental Units in the system. In each one of them i´ve inserted conditions types with the respective conditions amounts.
    Then, in the next step, i´ve created a Real Estate General Contract with a partner, but when i select the Rental Unit that i want to use in the contract,
    the system doesn´t copy the conditions with the amounts already assined to the Rental Units master data (which work perfectly, in the Rental Agreement).
    This means that i will have to repeat the introduction of the same information that i´ve already enter in the master data rental unit.
    Is this a standard behaviour, or am i doing anything wrong?
    Thanks in advance.
    Sincerely,
    Hugo Ferreira

    Hi Hugo,
    I'm working with IS-RE 4.6c and like to network with developers with IS-RE experience to discuss problems.
    Please, contact me asap
    [email protected]

  • HT204053 Max number of devices on one iTunes account?

    Max number of Devices on a single iTunes account

    Devices or Computers? The former there is no limit. For the latter there is a limit of 5.

  • Is there a max number of names that can be put into Contacts

    is there a max number of names that can be put into Contacts and still have the app work well?

    Yes, there is. It's how many contacts your hard drive can take. So you can fill up the entire computer with nothing but contacts until your HDD/Flash has no space left. So if you have 250GB, it'd be less than if you had 500GB and you'd have more on 750GB.

  • Max number of chars in process message MSEL?

    Hi, what is the max number of characteristics can be used in process message category's MSEL table? Right now, I am using more than 99 characteristics and I get a short dump DYNPRO_FIELD_CONVERSION. Is it really limited to 99 characteristics and if it is true, is there an OSS note to change it to allow more than 99?
    Thanks and points available

    Please make sure that you build a
    multithreaded program first (check with ldd).
    If anyone can tell me the maximum number of threads per process I would
    really appreicate it.
    Also the maximum number of open files per process. It depends on the architecture (x86/SPARC), OS version,
    64 or 32-bit, /etc/system, shell limitations (/usr/bin/ulimit) ...
    Search for "rlim_fd_max / rlim_fd_cur" on docs.sun.com too.
    HTH,
    -vladimir

  • Error while uploading the Real Estate Contract using IDOC & BAPI

    Hi  All ,
    I am trying to uploading the real estate contract data  by using  LSMW IDOC & BAPI methods  .
    In IDOC method I have used the Basic type as BUS1505_CREATE01 and Message type as BUS1505_CREATE. I have passed all mandatory fields then also i am unable to create the CONTRACT but and i am able to create CONTRACT using the bapi BAPI_RE_CN_CREATE  by passing the  values in SE37 and  i am able create CONTRACT manually in transaction code RECN  . Can any body know the reason .
    In BAPI method I have used the Business Object  BUS1505  ,Method CREATE  ,Message type BUS1505_CREATE and Basic type  BUS1505_CREATE03 . I have passed all the mandatory fields then also  i am unable  create the CONTRACT But with the same fields i am able create CONTRACT manually in transaction code RECN and i am able to create CONTRACT using the bapi BAPI_RE_CN_CREATE  by passing the  values in SE37  .
    Regards
    Srihari

    Hi All,
      I was passing blank entries so the above errors were coming. I removed those blank entries and now Im getting error like .
    "Individual renewal rule does not contain any extension periods"
    "No instance of object type ContractREFX has been created. External reference: REC <NEW>'.

  • What is the max number of hyperlinks supported in a PDF docment?

    What is the max number of hyperlinks supported in a PDF docment?
    How do I find out how many hyperlinks there are in a PDF document?

    I don't think there's a limit to the number of links you can add to a file...
    This code (taken from the reference files) will report the number of links in your file:
    var numLinks=0;
    for ( var p = 0; p < this.numPages; p++)
    var b = this.getPageBox("Crop", p);
    var l = this.getLinks(p, b);
    console.println("Number of Links on page " + p +" is " + l.length);
    numLinks += l.length;
    console.println("Number of Links in Document is " + numLinks);

  • Max number of Hits Account Identification

    Hi all,
    we are currently having the problem in IC that when somebody try to identify an account of an BP with more that 100 related sold to parties, that no account is displayed because of the standard max number of hits 100.
    I have found the path to customize this in the SPRO but this sentence in the SAP help is making me some headache:
    The higher the number you enter here, the more results the system will search for, and in turn, the more performance is affected. The maximum number of hits that the system allows is 100, which is also the default value.
    I understand the point of the performance, but does this mean that the performance is also affected the account identification of the other BP with less than 100 related sold to parties?
    Can anybody help in this issue?
    We are working on CRM 5.0.
    Regards
    Abosi
    Edited by: Abosi_3li2 on Feb 8, 2012 11:08 AM

    Hello
    The bug of nothing displayed if over 100 accounts are found is solved with [SAP note 1467929|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1467929.]
    The code you are referring to is:
    IF bpident_profile-max_hits IS INITIAL.
    max_hits = 100.
    ELSE.
    max_hits = bpident_profile-max_hits.
    ENDIF.
    It means that, if blank, 100 hits is considered. You can modify the customizing up to 255 results since that is the limit of accounts to be found.
    Regards
    Joaquin

  • "max number of thread"

    We are running a java web app on a Ubuntu Oracle WebLogic server version 10.3.3.
    The java web app performs long polls with open tcp socket to keep the client connection open. The clients are long polling the WebLogic at 30 seconds.
    Currently we are not able to maintain stability for greater than 24 hours with approximately 200 simultaneous sessions on WebLogic server. Session to me is active client/server tcp connection. We have re-written our application to use continuations, but we are seeing ConcurrentModificationException errors in performance testing.
    Is there any setting in WebLogic for “max number of thread” that can handle?
    Edited by: user9316392 on Jul 8, 2010 11:07 AM

    First, WebLogic since 9.0 has a self-tuning thread pool where WLS will automatically grow and shrink the number of threads based on some internal algorithms. I'm not aware of a hard limit so theoretically there is no max thread count as long as the JVM has memory and WLS thinks more threads will help. You can read up on it here:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/dev2arch/2006/01/workload-management.html
    Practically, I wouldn't expect more than several hundred threads to be helpful.
    As for your situation, how does WLS become unstable? Out of memory, out of file descriptors, errors on new requests, etc. I think you're going to have to use some JVM tools to see what happens to your JVM over time. Is there a memory leak somewhere, is it non-heap memory, etc. JRockit Mission Control is helpful if running on JRockit. If you're on Sun Hotspot, them presumably you can use some of the Hotspot tools. You'll want to compare the state of the JVM towards the beginning of your load test, but after a slight warm-up period with a snapshot after the load test has been running for a long period of time.

  • Max number of buffers

    For fast image grabbing I wand to store images in the memory of the PC. To do this I use LL ring buffering. The max number of buffers is limited by Labview to 50. I tried to increase this by MAX >>Tools >> IMAQ (like suggested on the site) but Labview keeps setting it back to 50, also after rebooting. How can I get this to a higher value?

    Hi,
    Take a look at this document:
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/FCA602CDBC4EDCEA86256BB1005AB1F2?OpenDocument
    This limit is no longer a issue in NI-IMAQ 3.0.1, (except for the NI-1408)
    Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
    Karsten
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Max number of orders

    Hi,
    I am working on ECC 6.0.
    I have been trying to use the Max number of orders for a Z condition type .
    The Max number of orders it is not working even after reaching the max order even after reaching the max order. If anyone has faced such an issue before kindly help.
    I had set the limits for pricing in the VK11  - additional data- Max number of order But of no use.
    Thanks
    Manoj

    hi,
    pl check if the conditin update field in the condition type definition is ticked or not at V/06.
    regards
    sadhu kishore

Maybe you are looking for