Max number of dashes in one path (limit / bug)

There seems to be limit of maximum number of dashes in one path. I've tested this on both CS3 and CS6 (Win). Only workaround I can think of is to split paths in shorter segments, but that is not practical for my situation.
Does anyone have more info about this, or workaround?
In screenshots we see two paths, short and one long one. They both have same line weight and dashed line properties BUT the long one (above) is nevertheless solid. You can test it yourself, just pick very small dash and gap properties and increase paths length.
Thanx

I'm not seeing the preserves exact dash and gap lengths selection on your screen shot, but my CS6 has it, and it makes a difference. (It's to the right next to the dashed line checkbox) Oddly enough, the other one (Aligns dashes to corners and path ends, adjusting lengths to fit) changes that seemingly solid long dashed line back to the appearance you wanted.

Similar Messages

HT204053 Max number of devices on one iTunes account?

Max number of Devices on a single iTunes account

Devices or Computers? The former there is no limit. For the latter there is a limit of 5.

Max. number of queries in one workbook

Hello experts,
is there a mximum number of queries which can be embedded in one workbook?
What are the disadvantages of using many queries in one workbook.
Are there other disadvantages for input ready queries?
Thank you
Johannes

Johannes, to follow up on Rakesh' answer, your performance will depend on the amount of data you are pulling out with the queries.
as for the additional disadvantages - unless you use the BExGetData formula, formatting will be your primary issue. Also, when you create buttons for the input ready query, the only time you get to set what Data Provider you are using is when you first code the button. After that, you would need to recreate the button to ensure that you are pointing to the right query.
the advantages are that you can model your reporting requirements any way you want (for example we use two multiproviders with different characteristics and use 6 queries to pull the data out)
Pavel

Problems with max number of items on a page limit?

I have a page with 106 items which submits fine but when I add another item (a text field) a page 404 error displays when I click the submit button. I had a look at [m-2399990] which mentioned that the "items rendered per page" limit is 100. I'm not sure whether this limit is the problem or not. I would greatly appreciate any help you can give.
Many thanks,
Christopher

Hi Christopher,
i had a same problem, the solution was to break the single forum into two tab pages.
More than 100 items in Form or Page
Hope this helps
Regards
mozkavra

What is the Max Number of Total Work Process that we can Have on One C.I

Hi,
What is the Max Number of Total Work Process that we can have on a Single C.I
Is there any Limit that We can only have Perticular Number of Total work process ?
Or it is just Unlimited number of total work process
Thanks & Regards
Dan.

from the system throughput point of view a rule of a thumb is:
1 up to 4 sometimes 5 workprocesses per CPU.
(one is used in Benchmarks where you have a very small number of transactions running with a small amount of database accesses)
you can easily find it out:
configure 4 WPs per CPU. If you have a number of WP's consuming nearly no CPU time you can reduce the number of WPs.
regards
Peter

Limit on number of addressees in one message? (using Apple Mail)

Is there a max number of addressees that can be contained in any one outgoing message? ..... i.e., if this limit is exceeded, the message will not be sent to any of the addressees.
I use Gmail via Apple Mail 2.1.3. Gmail's limit is 500 addressees.
Thanks.

Hi Bob, I have read of a limit far less than that for Mail, but can't remember what it was.
Is this in the To:, CC:, or BCC: entry btw?
IIRC, using a Group instead of individual addies gets you more.

Max number/size of QT files on one scratch folder

Is there a limit to the number of files in one scratch folder? Is it helpful to partition a big drive like I would on an Avid.
Can't seem to find any limits in the manual.
John
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

I wouldn't partition the drives unless they are sort of slow and old... it just takes up space. In the old Avid days I had, you needed to do this to keep video files off the slowest area of the arrays, but that isn't much the case anymore because the drives are so much faster than they used to be.
There is no limit to number of files either, just limited to your storage space.
Jerry

Is there a max number of Apple pro prints allowed per order? I tried 300, then 65 and neither worked. At $2.99 per for shipping, it is expensive to order 20 sets when I used to do just one for all.

Is there a max. number of Apple pro prints allowed per order with the updated iPhoto/Mountain Lion?
I have been using the system for years and have had no issues, but this first try under Mountain Lion I was told the max was 300 prints per order.
It order did not go through, nor did one with 65 photos. When I tried 2, it was fine, but at $2.99 shipping, plus tax,
paying $60 to get all 300 of my photos shipped is unreasonable.
Is this a glitch in the new OS? Hopefully it will be fixed.

Hi blabla12345,
(untested and without warranty)
replace this line:
const sSaveCUBE = "CUBE";
with this:
const sSaveCUBE = "cube";
Have fun

How to limit max number of downloads at once (and create a download queue)

I just "upgraded" to Mozilla 26.0 last night and was quite irritated that they changed the made it so that I cannot access the old download window. Was it really necessary to get rid of the work-around to get to the old download window?
Anyway, besides being more visually appealing, it previously downloaded two files at a time, unless I manually forced it to do more. The rest of the files would go into a download queue to wait their turn. After the update, it no longer creates a queue, leading to much slower downloads and it also slows my computer if I download too much.
Is there any way that I can limit the max number of downloads (unless I want to force it to download more) like I had on the previous version of firefox? I would prefer not to add more any add-ons, so if there is an check-box that I missed somewhere or something in about:config that would allow me to do this it would be better.
Also, is there any way to pause downloads now?

Check these 2 articles
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/change-firefox-behavior-when-open-file?esab=a&s=how+to+put+a+file+in+download+queue&r=2&as=s
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/find-and-manage-downloaded-files?esab=a&s=limit+maximum+number+of+downloads+and+create+a+download+queue&r=1&as=s
This might help you.
Thank you.

Max number of Hits Account Identification

Hi all,
we are currently having the problem in IC that when somebody try to identify an account of an BP with more that 100 related sold to parties, that no account is displayed because of the standard max number of hits 100.
I have found the path to customize this in the SPRO but this sentence in the SAP help is making me some headache:
The higher the number you enter here, the more results the system will search for, and in turn, the more performance is affected. The maximum number of hits that the system allows is 100, which is also the default value.
I understand the point of the performance, but does this mean that the performance is also affected the account identification of the other BP with less than 100 related sold to parties?
Can anybody help in this issue?
We are working on CRM 5.0.
Regards
Abosi
Edited by: Abosi_3li2 on Feb 8, 2012 11:08 AM

Hello
The bug of nothing displayed if over 100 accounts are found is solved with [SAP note 1467929|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1467929.]
The code you are referring to is:
IF bpident_profile-max_hits IS INITIAL.
max_hits = 100.
ELSE.
max_hits = bpident_profile-max_hits.
ENDIF.
It means that, if blank, 100 hits is considered. You can modify the customizing up to 255 results since that is the limit of accounts to be found.
Regards
Joaquin

In Oracle 10g, what is the max number of values we can pass to 'IN' Clause

Hi,
In my SQL query i have a scenario like, i have to pass the values to 'IN' Clause dynamically from other application. I want to know what is the the max number of values i can pass to 'IN' Clause.
i have searched in many pages i seeing answers like 'may be 1000' , 'not sure'....
Could any one tell me the exact limit of IN Clause in 10g.
Thanks in Advance.
Chandran

Hi, Chandran,
Chandran M wrote:
In my SQL query i have a scenario like, i have to pass the values to 'IN' Clause dynamically from other application. I want to know what is the the max number of values i can pass to 'IN' Clause.
i have searched in many pages i seeing answers like 'may be 1000' , 'not sure'....Don't overlook [Dont want to know|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=2683385&#2683385]. This may explain why people are reluctant to give a straight answer.
Could any one tell me the exact limit of IN Clause in 10g.1000 items such as IN (1, 2, 3, ..., 1000)
No limit on the number of sets: IN ((1), (2), (3), ...) *<=== NOT QUITE!* See below
No limit in sub-queries: IN (SELECT ...)
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jun 3, 2009 9:43 AM
The limit of 1000 applies to sets of single items: (x) IN ((1), (2), (3), ...)
There is no limit if the sets contain two or more items: (x, 0) IN ((1,0), (2,0), (3,0), ...)
Thanks to Michaels for pointing this out.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jun 3, 2009 10:22 AM
Fixed link

Is a subquery in a BO report limited to a max number of records???

Here's my problem:
I recieved an excel sheet with 700 records of customers from a client who wants me to to create a report with specific data for these customers in my Business Objects universe (BO6.5 on SQL Server).
So I created a dataprovider with query 1, i.e. the requested data of customers. Then I created a second dataprovider, query 2, based on 'personal files', i.e. the excel sheet. In query 1 I added to the conditions that each customer should be in (sub)query 2 (CustomerId In list of the query result ('query2.CustomerId').
the syntax I have used for this seems OK.
However, I recieve the following error: "Too many selected values (LOV0001)". I know this error has to do with parameter MAX_INLIST_VALUES, which is limited by default to 99 and can be extended to 256 max. But I thought it refers to the max number of items in lists of values.
When I limit the number of records in the excel sheet to 99 the result is perfect (proof that I got the syntax right!). I can upgrade the parameter to 256, and can split the excel sheet into three, but that will not be useful when next time my client sends me 10.000 customer records.
Can I make reports in BO which use subqueries that result in more than 256 records at all? (hardly imaginable).
What is the best way to do this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Lucas,
Following is the information regarding the issue you are getting and might help you to resolve the issue.
ADAPT00519195- Too many selected values (LOV0001) - Select Query Result operand
For XIR2 Fixed Details-Rejected as this is by design
I have found that this is a limitation by design and when the values exceed 18000 we get this error in BO.
There is no fix for this issue, as itu2019s by design. The product always behaved in this manner.
Also an ER (ADAPT00754295) for this issue has already been raised.
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if and when this Enhancement Request will be taken on by the developers.
A dedicated team reviews all ERs on a regular basis for technical and commercial feasibility and whether or not the functionality is consistent with our product direction. Unfortunately we cannot presently advise on a timeframe for the inclusion of any ER to our product suite.
The product group will then review the request and determine whether or not the functionality/feature will be included in a future release.
Currently I can only suggest that you check the release notes in the ReadMe documents of future service packs, as it will be listed there once the ER has been included
The only workaround which I can suggest for now is:
Workaround 1:
Test the issue by keep the value of MAX_Inlist_values parameter to 256 on designer level.
Workaround 2:
The best solution is to combine 'n' queries via a UNION. You should first highlight the first 99 or so entries from the LOV list box and then combine this query with a second one that selects the remaining LOV choices.
Using UNION between queries; which is the only possible workaround
Please do let me know if you have any queries related to the same.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Max number of file descriptors in 32 vs 64 bit compilation

Hi,
I compiled a simple C app (with Solaris CC compiler) that attempts to open 10000 file descriptors using fopen(). It runs just fine when compile in 64-bit mode (with previously setting �ulimit �S -n 10000�).
However, when I compile it in 32-bit mode it fails to open more than 253 files. Call to system(�ulimit �a�) suggests that �nofiles (descriptors) 10000�.
Did anybody ever see similar problem before?
Thanks in advance,
Mikhail

On 32-bit Solaris, the stdio "FILE" struct stores the file descriptor (an integer) in an 8-bit field. WIth 3 files opened automatically at program start (stdin, stdout, stderr), that leaves 253 available file descriptors.
This limitation stems from early versions of Unix and Solaris, and must be maintained to allow old binaries to continue to work. That is, the layout of the FILE struct is wired into old programs, and thus cannot be changed.
When 64-bit Solaris was introduced, there was no compatibility issue, since there were no old 64-bit binaries . The limit of 256 file descriptors in stdio was removed by making the field larger. In addition, the layout of the FILE struct is hidden from user programs, so that future changes are possible, should become necessary.
To work around the limit, you can play some games with dup() and closing the original descriptor to make it available for use with a new file, or you can arrange to have fewer than the max number of files open at one time.
A new interface for stdio is being implemented to allow a large number of files to be open at one time. I don't know when it will be available or for which versions of Solaris.

Max Number Errors Reached but all components were successful

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error
-- Apparently, the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error -- Apparently,
the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike
before this error there might be some warning messages posted in execution results page. Please post that. or else message with red mark (error msg) will be posted.
- please mark correct answers

Max. number of expressions exceeded

I have a simple SQL to select data from a single table with a
list of 1000 elements i.e. SELECT A FROM TABLE_A WHERE B IN (1,
2, 3, ..., 1000). It worked fine. If I added one more i.e.
WHERE B IN (1, 2, 3, ...., 1000, 1001), then I got error 1795 -
Max number of expressions exceeded 254. I thought this error
applies to the number of expressions. What I have was a list of
values in a single expression -> B IN (1, 2, ...).
I think the error message is misleading. If there is a limit of
1000 elements in the IN expression, the error message should say
so unlesss Oracle somehow formats the 1000 elements into 254
expressions behind the scene.
Any comments.
Thanks.
null

What versions are you using?
Do you have a License?
thanks
mike

Max number of dashes in one path (limit / bug)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for