Max. number of expressions exceeded

I have a simple SQL to select data from a single table with a
list of 1000 elements i.e. SELECT A FROM TABLE_A WHERE B IN (1,
2, 3, ..., 1000). It worked fine. If I added one more i.e.
WHERE B IN (1, 2, 3, ...., 1000, 1001), then I got error 1795 -
Max number of expressions exceeded 254. I thought this error
applies to the number of expressions. What I have was a list of
values in a single expression -> B IN (1, 2, ...).
I think the error message is misleading. If there is a limit of
1000 elements in the IN expression, the error message should say
so unlesss Oracle somehow formats the 1000 elements into 254
expressions behind the scene.
Any comments.
Thanks.
null

What versions are you using?
Do you have a License?
thanks
mike

Similar Messages

Max number of items exceeded?

I am trying to develop a questionaire like application. Most of the logic is stored inside pl/sql functions (that is retrieving the previous or next question with possible answers and answer-types, like, eg. radiogroup, select-list, textarea, ...) while all of the questions and respective possible answers are kept inside a collection. In processing the answers after submit I store given answers inside the same collection, basically by nullifying all possibly previously given answers for the current question and then looping through eg, g_f01.count to refill. The entire application remains on the same page, showing eg., in one 'frame', one or two questions with say 7 checkboxes and two textareas.
Everything seems to work fine, I can go forward and backward and will find new questions or ones that already have been answerd, but!!...
after the 50st item (answer), that is after I reached the 50st radiogroup, checkbox or textarea, new checkboxes or radiogroups even though shown the resulting values will not be stored inside the collection anymore.
generating the page i use:
htp.prn(apex_item.radiogroup(p_idx => 1, p_value => c2.a_id, p_selected_value => c2.qa_id, p_attributes => 'id="P2_QUEST_' || i || '"'));
and in processing correspondingly ...
FOR i IN 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.COUNT
LOOP
FOR c2 IN
(SELECT seq_id,
c001 q_id,
c002 a_id,
c012 qa_id
FROM apex_collections
WHERE c001 = to_char(p_q_id)
AND collection_name = 'ANSWERS'
AND c002 = apex_application.g_f01(i))
LOOP
apex_collection.update_member_attribute(p_collection_name =>
'ANSWERS', p_seq => c2.seq_id, p_attr_number => '12',
p_attr_value => c2.a_id);
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
to me I only use f01 ... f04 say, ... Is it possible that I still hit the max of 50 page-items?
Regards
j.

max number of items exceeded?

Real-time 8.6 Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses- with no connections

I've been using the remote panel right along with no problems to connect to my Compact Fieldpoint. This morning I accidently opened the connection twice on the same computer and tripped the "Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses" error. Now it will not let me connect anymore from my computer. I've tried clearing cookies, cache and history in Internet Explorer and rebooting my computer. I've fired up the Remote Panel Connection Manager which shows no connections, and the NI License Information window does not show any connections which have been denied due to max # of clients being exceeded. Is there a way to reset this without having to reboot my RT controller? I'm running RT8.6 and LV 8.6 Full Dev System and understanding that it should come with 1 remote panel license.
Thanks
maat
LV2014

The boss wanted to see an updated feature, so I was forced to deploy a new version and reboot. Problem went away as I suspected it would.
I did manage to make the same mistake again this morning (launch the remote panel in 2 different MSIE windows) and after closing them both I could reconnect. Must be a glitch or a bug? It'd be interesting to see if anyone else has this problem. For now...solved, but it would be nice to see a way to fix this without rebooting.
Message Edited by maat on 10-22-2008 10:10 AM
maat
LV2014

DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

Hello,
In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
Status before error started
I have already gone through notes 1757252
But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
DEV_DISP
Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24366
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24502
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
*** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
*** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
-IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid 13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24691
-IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
-IN-- msg_name -
sm21:
Q0 G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
work process trace
please check the image
Thanks
Shradha

Hello Divyanshu
It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
Parameters
Current
Changed
rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
2400
SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
isp/max_vm_priv_no
3
SERVLET=3, RFC=3
rdisp/max_priv_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
600
3600
Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
1000
1058
Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
300
1058
Work Process Communication Blocks
vmcj/option/ps
960M
1460M
poolsize for the VMC
vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
90
70
VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
64
128
max. vm heap
rdisp/keepalive
1200
3600
Timer for check of unused connections
rdisp/keepalive_timeout
60
150
Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
rdisp/wppriv_max_no
DEFAULT
16
Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode

If an airport Extreme is combined with one or more airport expresses, what is the max number of connections? Is it just 50, or 50 plus 10 for each Express?

I would like to set up a wireless network with an Airport Extreme, plus one or more Airport Expresses to extend the range. I know an Extreme supports 50 users and an Express 10 users, but when they're combined does the number of users go up according to the number of Expresses combined with the Extreme, or is it limited at 50 no-matter how many Expresses are added?
Thanks
Steve

50 users + 10 users + 10 users + etc. I am assuming that each Express device will be connected using a wired Ethernet connection.
But, unless you have a truly fantastic Internet connection with your ISP, things are going to be mighty slow on the network since all users split up the available bandwidth.
So, if you have a 50 Mbps Internet connection, 50 users will have approximately 1 Mbps of bandwidth to work with. Few of us would consider having a 1 Mbps service in our home, even if we only had one computer....way too slow.

Max no of gateways exceeded (100)

Hi guys
Suddenly, I start to receive error messages about the RFC failure, No changes done in Basis related.
There are RFC error any many areas;
SM21 - I Maximum number of 100 connectable SAP gateways reached\
STMS - RFC communications error with system/destination TMSADM-PRD.DOMAIN_DEV
Sm59 - we cannot verify the RFC Connection
Please advise us on base of SOS
Regards
Anwer Waseem

Hi
Thanks for the expert reply, i did same as below described, there are 6 clients in the "logged clients" by the smgw.
0     DBSERVER1     sapgw02     Local Web AS     DBSERVER1     ip dbserver1     Wed Jun 25 09:02:42 2008     Connection OK
1,037     DEV     sapdp01     Remote Gateway     DEV     ip dev     Wed Jun 25 08:38:04 2008     Connection OK
1,229     ip dbserver2     sapdp02     Remote Gateway     ip dbserver2     ip dbserver2     Wed Jun 25 09:02:12 2008     Connection OK
1,292     QAS     sapdp01     Remote Gateway     QAS     ip qas     Wed Jun 25 08:38:04 2008     Connection OK
1,319     DBSERVER     jlaunch     External Client     DBSERVER     ip dbserver1     Wed Jun 25 09:02:12 2008     Connection OK
1,377     DBSERVER1     IGS.PRD     Registered Server     DBSERVER1     ip dbserver1     Wed Jun 25 09:02:38 2008     Connection OK
RFC Trace file
============
Sun Jun 22 15:01:03 2008
***LOG Q14=> GwIConnectHandle, max gateways (100) [gwxxrd.c     8504]
LOCATION    SAP-Gateway on host DBSERVER1 / sapgw02
ERROR       max no of gateways exceeded (100)
TIME        Sun Jun 22 15:01:03 2008
RELEASE     700
COMPONENT   SAP-Gateway
VERSION     2
RC          631
MODULE      gwxxrd.c
LINE        8505
COUNTER     112523
I am unable to verify the RFC and unable to transport from QAS to PRD
Regards

Is a subquery in a BO report limited to a max number of records???

Here's my problem:
I recieved an excel sheet with 700 records of customers from a client who wants me to to create a report with specific data for these customers in my Business Objects universe (BO6.5 on SQL Server).
So I created a dataprovider with query 1, i.e. the requested data of customers. Then I created a second dataprovider, query 2, based on 'personal files', i.e. the excel sheet. In query 1 I added to the conditions that each customer should be in (sub)query 2 (CustomerId In list of the query result ('query2.CustomerId').
the syntax I have used for this seems OK.
However, I recieve the following error: "Too many selected values (LOV0001)". I know this error has to do with parameter MAX_INLIST_VALUES, which is limited by default to 99 and can be extended to 256 max. But I thought it refers to the max number of items in lists of values.
When I limit the number of records in the excel sheet to 99 the result is perfect (proof that I got the syntax right!). I can upgrade the parameter to 256, and can split the excel sheet into three, but that will not be useful when next time my client sends me 10.000 customer records.
Can I make reports in BO which use subqueries that result in more than 256 records at all? (hardly imaginable).
What is the best way to do this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Lucas,
Following is the information regarding the issue you are getting and might help you to resolve the issue.
ADAPT00519195- Too many selected values (LOV0001) - Select Query Result operand
For XIR2 Fixed Details-Rejected as this is by design
I have found that this is a limitation by design and when the values exceed 18000 we get this error in BO.
There is no fix for this issue, as itu2019s by design. The product always behaved in this manner.
Also an ER (ADAPT00754295) for this issue has already been raised.
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if and when this Enhancement Request will be taken on by the developers.
A dedicated team reviews all ERs on a regular basis for technical and commercial feasibility and whether or not the functionality is consistent with our product direction. Unfortunately we cannot presently advise on a timeframe for the inclusion of any ER to our product suite.
The product group will then review the request and determine whether or not the functionality/feature will be included in a future release.
Currently I can only suggest that you check the release notes in the ReadMe documents of future service packs, as it will be listed there once the ER has been included
The only workaround which I can suggest for now is:
Workaround 1:
Test the issue by keep the value of MAX_Inlist_values parameter to 256 on designer level.
Workaround 2:
The best solution is to combine 'n' queries via a UNION. You should first highlight the first 99 or so entries from the LOV list box and then combine this query with a second one that selects the remaining LOV choices.
Using UNION between queries; which is the only possible workaround
Please do let me know if you have any queries related to the same.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Max Number of Procurement Proposal for a date

We have scenario where a user has changed fixed lot size for a material 11,70,000 to 1 Pc. As result more than 2 Million Purchase requisitions got created by MRP. Is there any standard config settings, where we can maintain max number of procurement proposal for given date or demand. So that we can prevent such occurances in future.

Hello Amit.
The materials planning creates a large number of order proposals in the amount of the fixed lot size for this one request for a fixed lot size (lot-sizing procedure 'FX') with a large number of requests and a small number of fixed lot sizes.
In Customizing for the plant parameters of materials planning (transaction OPPQ, table T399D) you can set a parameter for the maximum number of order proposals that are created by materials planning for a requirements date.
The materials planning of this material terminates regularly if the maximum number is exceeded. An error document with error message E098 is generated. This way you can prevent that the MRP run terminates if the lot-sizing procedure is set unfavorably.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

SetMaxIterations API not setting the max number of iterations

Hi
Am using oracle 9.2.0.1.0 version.
trying to use OCCI's bulk insertion feature using AP setMaxIteration, addIterations and executeUpdate combinations.
from code (OCCI) if i do stmt->setMaxIterations(60)
and then check for number of max iterations set by setMaxIterations using getMaxIterations it returns me 1(default value).
Did setMaxParamSize as well.
Also, moving ahead if I bind params of the statement and on reaching addIteration API, it throws an SQLException -: "ORA-32142: maximum number of iterations exceeded"
Hope this was not a bug in this version of Oracle, if so request you to let me know in which version it got fixed and the patch location.
Also, if anyone has this version, pl write down few lines of code and verify in the same oracle version, so that I can figure out whether this is a problem in my code or oracle supplied OCCI 9 libraries.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Regards
Navin Sharma
Code snippet:
conn = env->createConnection("scott", "tiger","");
stmt = conn->createStatement("INSERT INTO table_name VALUES(:1,:2)");
stmt->setMaxIterations(62);
cout<<"Number of iterations set by setMaxIterations - "<<stmt->getMaxIterations();
stmt->setInt(1,100);
stmt->setString(2,"Hello OCCI");
stmt->addIteration();
stmt->setInt(1,400);
stmt->setInt(2,"Am using bulk updates");
stmt->executeUpdate();

Please update to the latest patch on 9.2 or 10g.
Rgds.

When i try to sign in icloud with different id it says max number of free accounts reached for this device what shall i do

PLease help me.....i wanna sign in icloud with different account but it says max number of free acconts reached

Somehow your Apple ID/iCloud account has been used on multiple iOS devices and exceeded the maximum. We have no way of knowing which devices. We are users like you on this forum.

Max number of caracters in subtitles in Encore? Trying to avoid "Subtitle too complex to render"

Does anyone know what the max number of caracters in a single Encore subtitle "string" is if you want to avoid the "Subtitle too complex to render" error message?
I have a project with one subtitle layer, concisting of 483 "subtitle strings" in it and i'm getting the "...too complex..." message when rendering.
But instead of spending endless hours of trying to guess which one(s) cause the problem, i'd love to have an answer like "Don't ever tap in more than XX caracters in a single subtitle"
And now we are at it:
I'm let to believe that the distance between the individual "subtitle strings" also can release the "...too complex..." message. Any clues as to what the minimum number of frames has to be between the individual "strings" in order to avoid the error message (the project in question is a "classic" DVD-project - not BluRay)?
Thanx in advance.

Well, just in case anyone else is stuck with the same problem and comes across this old string: After several tests I have come up with this solution that works for me - and perhaps for others too:
Notice that the subtitle borders are set differently than the default settings. The settings I use keeps the subtitle string just inside the outer safe area border where as the default settings are inside the inner safe area border and thus resulting in shorter subtitle lines.
You can choose a different typeface and size if you like. These matters doesn't seem to have much influence on the "_too complex_" issue.
With these settings I can write a maximum of 60 characters, including spaces, per line. Remember to make forced line breaks between the lines, if your subtitle string is longer than one line. Otherwise Encore will see what appears to be two lines as one long line exceeding the max number of characters and thus resulting in a "_too complex_" error.
And as for number of frames between subtitle strings: Minimum 5 frames - but Encore will automaticly warn you if you place text strings closer than that.

HT204053 Max number of devices on one iTunes account?

Max number of Devices on a single iTunes account

Devices or Computers? The former there is no limit. For the latter there is a limit of 5.

Hyperion Financial Reports Studio Error. Max No of connections exceeded.

I have encountered an error in FR Studio, it says Max No of Connections Exceeded.
It occured twice in this month, everytime it happens we need to restart Reporting and Analysis Framework. Can someone suggest where can I increase the max no of connections allowed?

Ok...My bad..
You will have tun serviceconfig.sh under Hyperion_Home\products\Foundation\workspace\bin to bring up GUI,then From the menu available you will see Remote service configurator,select that and provide the credentials.After you login,there should RM1 and SB1.You will have to go o properties of RM1 and SB1 and then increase the connection.Restart is required for this to take affect.
Let me know

Is there a max number of names that can be put into Contacts

is there a max number of names that can be put into Contacts and still have the app work well?

Yes, there is. It's how many contacts your hard drive can take. So you can fill up the entire computer with nothing but contacts until your HDD/Flash has no space left. So if you have 250GB, it'd be less than if you had 500GB and you'd have more on 750GB.

Max number of chars in process message MSEL?

Hi, what is the max number of characteristics can be used in process message category's MSEL table? Right now, I am using more than 99 characteristics and I get a short dump DYNPRO_FIELD_CONVERSION. Is it really limited to 99 characteristics and if it is true, is there an OSS note to change it to allow more than 99?
Thanks and points available

Please make sure that you build a
multithreaded program first (check with ldd).
If anyone can tell me the maximum number of threads per process I would
really appreicate it.
Also the maximum number of open files per process. It depends on the architecture (x86/SPARC), OS version,
64 or 32-bit, /etc/system, shell limitations (/usr/bin/ulimit) ...
Search for "rlim_fd_max / rlim_fd_cur" on docs.sun.com too.
HTH,
-vladimir

Max. number of expressions exceeded

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for