Max-streaming-connections-per-session limit

Hello,
i'm trying BlazeDS with Air app.
I set blazeDs on a Jboss Server with JMS adapter.
I configure it with a streamingAMF channel.
In user agent configuration i put msie, firefox value to 10 for the max-streaming-connections-per-session limit param.
In Air client configuration i instantiate a producer and a consumer on the same streaming AMF channel.
After the consumer.subscribe() i launch the producer.connect() on the server i get this error :
14:25:20,015 INFO [STDOUT] [BlazeDS] Endpoint with id 'my-streaming-amf' cannot grant streaming connection to FlexClient with id '497031A2-7B0D-019A-0E1D-7622A-A631D28' because max-streaming-connections-per-session limit of '1' has been reached.
Is it a limitation of use of blazeDs with Air app ?

First, if you change the limit to 10, then it should be 10 and not 1. If you still see 1, then please log a bug.
Second, you really want this limit to be 1 in IE and 4 in Firefox 2. But there's no reason to have more than 1 streaming connection from the server to the client unless you need to talk to two different endpoints.

Similar Messages

Increasing max-streaming-connections-per-session has slow acknowledge response?

Our application is a Flex GUI with a WebLogic Server (BlaseDS) on a private network. We were originally using IE 6, but have upgraded to IE 8.
I am trying to use publish/subscribe messaging to monitor lengthy processes on the server and received incremental data. With 1 such process everything works fine. But we want to allow the user to subscribe to more than 1 message destination. So I increased the "max-streaming-connections-per-session" (default is 1) in the services-config.xml file
     <channel-definition id="process-notification-streaming-amf"
          class="mx.messaging.channels.StreamingAMFChannel">
          <endpoint url=https://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/streamingnotificationamf"
          class="flex.messaging.endpoints.StreamingAMFEndpoint"/>
          <properties>
               <user-agent-settings>
                    <user-agent match-on="MSIE" kickstart-bytes="2048"
                         max-streaming-connections-per-session="3" />
               </user-agent-settings>
          </properties>
     </channel-definition>
If we leave max-streaming-connections-per-session as the default value of 1 and try to subscribe to another message destination we get an error indicating limit has been reached:
     [BlaseDS]Endpoint with id 'process-notification-streaming-amf' cannot grant streaming connection to FlexClient with id '7FFC82DE-etc ' because max-streaming-connections-per-session limit of '1' has been reached.
     We upgraded to IE8 as documentation indicates IE8 allows for an increase of max-streaming-connections-per-session, where IE 6 is limited to 1. But increasing max-streaming-connections-per-session does not quite solve the problem. We have 3 consumers; consumer1, consumer2, consumer3. For each of these consumers, we add event listeners for MessageAckEvent.ACKNOWLEDGE and MessageEvent.MESSAGE.
     We call consumer1.subscribe(). When we receive the acknowledge message, we call consumer2.subscribe() (likewise with consumer3)
     The problem is it takes over 2 minutes to receive the acknowledge message from the call to consumer1.subscribe(). (With max-streaming-connections-per-session set to 1, the acknowledge message is received in a few seconds.)
     So, increasing max-streaming-connections-per-session removes the error about reaching a limit, but it appears to come with a cost of a big delay in a long delay on the call to subscribe? Or is there something we are missing?

I guess I will answer my own question. Hopefully this will be useful to someone else in the future...
The problem was coming from IE being limited to 1 connection by the registry. The solution can be found at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/282402
I manually performed the steps to update the registry, though microsoft provides a "Fix It"; MicrosoftFixit50098.msi
One other key element was to make sure to have kickstart-bytes="2048".

Max streaming connections per session error

I have a flex application that uses messaging with a streaming AMF connection, falling back to polling. When the max number of streaming connections on the server is reached, it does fall back to polling (at least it prints the max-streaming-clients error but the client connects, so I assume it is falling back - how can I tell?). However, occasionally the streaming connection will not initialize and it does not fall back - no messages are received on the client. The following error is logged on the server:
[EMST]09/25/2008 13:43:18.231 [ERROR] Endpoint with id 'my-streaming-amf' cannot grant streaming connection to FlexClient with id 'D5B8E3A1-1A1C-063E-84A6-6A743A1E4EE0' because max-streaming-connections-per-session limit of '1' has been reached.
This would make sense if the issue was caused by trying to initialize the streaming connection in two tabs of a browser, but I am only trying to initialize in one tab. Closing the browser (and thus destroying the session) does not fix it. The only solution I've found is to reboot the client machine. This has happened in both FireFox 3.0.2 and IE 7.
(1) What could cause the client to get in this state?
(2) When it happens, why doesn't it fall back to polling? Is the fallback only for when the server max connections is reached? When the streaming connection doesn't initialize, no messages are received.
(3) Is there a way to explicitly close the streaming connection on the client so we can fix this without rebooting?
Thanks!

Hi Mary. If you turn on Debug level logging on the client and the server you should be able to tell if you have fallen back to a polling channel after the attempt to connect over the streaming channel has been rejected. In the client log, you will see the flex application sending poll requests to the server at the polling interval configured in the channel and in the server log you should see that the server is receiving these requests.
The behaviour you are seeing seems very strange to me. The reason we have the max-streaming-connections-per-session limit on the server is because most browsers limit the number of active connections that can be made to a server from a single session. In IE for example, this is 2. What happens in most cases when the browser's connection limit is reached is that new connections are put on hold until one of the existing connections closes. This would cause your flex application to hang with no errors being reported on the client or the server. This is why we need the max-streaming-connections-per-session setting on the server. This prevents more than one persistent connection from being made from the same session, so the browser should never reach it's max connections per server limit and lock up.
It looks like you are somehow getting the browser to lock up even though the server is only limiting you to one streaming connection per session. It may be possible to do this if you reload the flex application in the browser (by doing a page refresh) in which case the browser could possibly briefly leave the streaming connection open in the background and when you tried to create a new streaming connection, the browser's connection limit to the server would have been reached and the application could hang. When the application hangs are you reloading the swf/page in the browser?
I really don't know why closing the browser wouldn't fix the problem. You're right that closing the browser should end the session. If you launch a new browser and load the swf do you get the same "cannot grant streaming connection" error on the server or is the browser just locked up, ie. no error is received on the client and the server?
You're not using a proxy server or anything like that are you that might be holding a connection open to the server?
-Alex

Network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server keeps reverting to user set 4

I didn't used to have this problem as far as I'm aware, but as of recently, I've noticed that if I try to download more than 4 of one thing at a time from the same site, it would fail. For instance, if I have up 5 web pages of streaming content, only 4 will load, the other 5th one will do nothing until I finish one of the others. Upon looking up some information on this, I saw that the network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server is set at "user set = 4", and if I change that number to anything else, it corresponds. If I click to 'reset' the number, it goes to the default of 6 - which is still less than what it used to be. I used to not even have a limit on this as far as I'm aware, or if I did, it was well beyond 10 and that wasn't a product of me manipulating it.
What I'm asking is this:
1) How do I make this so it permanently switches to a higher number? Every time I reset it to 6 or I manually change the number to something higher, once I close it, those settings go back to 4.
2) Why is it reverting and not staying the way I change it?
3) What's the purpose of this and why is it just recently doing it when I haven't put any new add-ons or made any other refinements to Firefox that I'm aware of?
Any help would be appreciated

Two possible causes for it resetting to 4 that I can think of.
# You have an add-on handing that pref and that is resetting it to 4 when Firefox is restarted.
# That pref is set via user.js and that causes it to go to that value as Firefox starts.
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes <br />
http://kb.mozillazine.org/User.js_file

Web service request ....one db connection per session OR all share one...

in servlet i use
public void init(ServletConfig config) throws ServletException { }
so it only gets the db connection once per session
now that I am working on a web service....im not sure how to do something similiar
I want to either have all request coming in to use the same ONE connection OR maybe one created per session
I have way too many web service requests and it creates too many jdbc connections....what can i do to pervent this?
I dont care if they have to wait longer;
I just want to cut down the number of jdbc connections to 1 to 2
any help appreciated, thanks

You want to use a connection pool. If you just use one connection, your web users are likely to be waiting on the availabilty of the connection. A pool will let you set whatever maximum you want; 1 or 100...
There are a number of database connection pooling options. One of the morepopular is DBCP, part of the Apache project, which is free and open source.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/
There are other such "drop in" poolers and some database vendors are now supplying connection pooling in their drivers.

Limit open connections per each database session in Oracle 11

Hi for All,
Please, I would like to know what the limit of connections per session in Oracle 11. This issue is relevant to the use of UTL_TCP for connections with ATMs. Also, someone would have some other approach or suggestion of communication architecture with Automated Teller Machine?
Regards,
Edited by: user11118871 on 04/02/2010 07:30

I suspect Spotlight is showing you the PGA plus the entire mapped portion of shared memory or the total of all shared memory pages visited. On HP-UX these are the kind of numbers you would get from ps, which may be Spotlight's source for the data.
The glance utility of HP-UX is a more useful way to obtain detailed information on process memory usage.
Regards,
Jeremiah Wilton
ORA-600 Consulting
http://www.ora-600.net

How to limit max IMAP connections in mail.app?

Hi folks,
due to Mailserver configuration limitations from Provider side like courier-imap settings "maxperip" = 4, some (like me) may have problems to use or connect more than one imap-account to the same server in mail.app.
In thunderbird you have the option to configure the max open connections per imap-account. If set to 1 connection, i'm able to use 4 imap-accounts.
But how to configure this in mail.app???
Thanks in advance,
paranoja

oh, as i found this seems to be an unfixed an verry old problem.
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=5820548
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6204843&#6204843
It's really a shame that apple didn't fixed it since the problem is from 2007!!!
It seems that there was a key "CacheOveraggressively" in com.apple.mail.plist in earlier versions, but i can't find it there with Version 3.5 (930.3)!
Seems that the only real solution for now is to use thunderbird......
P.S.: Mail in IPodTouch has of course the same Problem!

Per Session Maximum Message Limit

I have a front-end messaging server that would need to feed the messages to an Anti Spam System before these messages could be further relayed to their respective destinations/back-end messaging server.
The Anti Spam System has a certain limit in number of messages it could receive/process per session. So, I would like to set a per session limit in the number of messages my front-end messaging server can send to the Anti Spam System in order not to have long queue at the front-end messaging server due to the receiving/processing limit set in the Anti Spam System.
The exact version of my messaging server here is iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21. Please advise on how could I achieve this objective of mine.

Could you please explain the below sentence as stated in SUN documentation? =========================================
If the option accepts an integer value, a base may be specified using notation of the form b%v, where b is the base expressed in base 10 and vb. =========================================
For example, if I would like to set "ATTEMPT_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SESSION" to 15 messages, how do I set it based on the above highlighted sentence from SUN documentation?

Asa5505 crashing perhaps related to maximum connections per second

I have an asa5505 with software version 7.2(3) that randomly stops responding.
The firewall sits in front of a public facing webserver that handles a significant amount of traffic.
I was wondering that would happen when the asa5505 reaches or exceeds the 4000 connections per second limit... i.e. would this possibly explain why my asa5505 stops responding and requires a power cycle in order to start working again.
when it "crashes" it does not respond on either the outside or inside interfaces.

Investigation into this issue should be performed via the console connection. This may allow you access to debugs/switchport states/etc. that you will not otherwise get if the ASA is not accepting connections through the LAN. I understand that a quick power-cycle 'resolves' the issue but you're dooming yourself to face it again. Next time this happens I would recommend interrogating the device via console and posting back your results. From there, I'm sure we can help.
Kind Regards,
Kevin
**Please remember to rate helpful posts as well as mark the question as 'answered' once your issue is resolved. This will help others to find your solution faster.

Session Limit per POD?

Hi!
I understand that a POD can hold multiple SOD instances
- Each SOD instance has a limit on the amount of concurrent sessions you can open (when transmiting WS calls)
Now.
... If I have 5 SOD instances in a given POD
... and each of these 5 instances can open up to 10 concurrent sessions.
... this will mean theoretically in a multithreaded environment (transmitting to 5 instances concurrently),
I can have up to 50 (5x10) concurrent open sessions.
HOWEVER ... is there a such a thing as session limit per POD (that we should take into consideration)?
Meaning if we have 6 SOD instance (each with 10 max concurrent sessions) in a given POD ...
... and a POD have a limit of 30 max concurrent sessions
... we should NOT be running all 6 concurrently (because it will need 60 concurrent sessions which exceeds POD limit).
To reiterate the question... Is there such thing as max number of allowable sessions per POD?
Thanks

First, you should not "patch" directly the spfile but user ALTER SYSTEM command.
Note also that SESSIONS is a derived parameter from PROCESSES.
To increase SESSIONS parameter:
1. connect with SYSDBA privilege:
sqlplus / as sysdba2. change PROCESSES parameter:
SQL> alter system set processes=200 scope=spfile;3. reboot instance
shutdown immediate
startup4. check parameter sessions:
SQL> show parameter sessions;
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
java_max_sessionspace_size           integer     0
java_soft_sessionspace_limit         integer     0
license_max_sessions                 integer     0
license_sessions_warning             integer     0
logmnr_max_persistent_sessions       integer     1
sessions                             integer     225
shared_server_sessions               integerBefore the change, I had PROCESSES set to 150 and SESSIONS to 170.
To count all sessions in your instance:
select count(*) from v$session;Please make sure also to give exact Oracle error message number if any.
Message was edited by:
Pierre Forstmann

Whats the limit of max no of concurrent sessions in oracle9i database

Hi,
pls let me know whats the limit of max no of concurrent sessions in oracle9i database .
Thanks.

Hi,
Oracle no longer offers licensing by the number of concurrent sessions.
There used to be 2 initialization parameters : - LICENSE_MAX_SESSIONS and LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING . these have been deprecated.
Therefore Jaffer's statements stands.....
Cheers...rCube.

Once per session, connected anyway

I have an authentication scheme that is set to once per session. The users are defined in oid and have to logon using sso.
So far so good. But in following scenario it goes wrong.
1. User enters the htmldb url
2. User gets the logon screen from sso
3. User logs in and is than forwarded to the application where the authorisation scheme says him he has no access and he is redirected to a public page that tells him this.
4. the user presses the 'Back' key on the browser, so he gets the login screen again.
5. he enters again his username and password, and enters.
-> now he is logged in and gets the screen he is not allowed to.
What goes wrong here? Why does the session not remember that this user has no access ?
Grtz,
Chris.

Scott,
The solution of htmldb_util.reset_authorizations works fine. But in the end we choose another option.
We are using the error page now to display wether the user has no access to the application. It looks like the user has access to the error pag even if he has no access to any of the application pages. Now it works fine.
Now the authorization also returns false.
Tnx for the replies,
Chris.

Multiple Consumer Object per Streaming Connection in AIR2.0

HI,
we require streaming server setup for our project.
We are trying to minimize number of connections to the streaming server.
My query is "If we have multiple Consumer object instance with same channel and destination, will all the Consumer instances share the same streaming connection or for every Consumer object instance a new Connection is created?"
Thanks in advacne for your support.
Regards,
Shailendra

Thanks doghouseJim, appreicate
I tried to substitute onStatus function with your code (metadata) and as a result I don't have reported error anymore.
However, for strange reason, once the flash goes into a html document the video is not loaded...
any idea?
Cheers

Exceeded session limit on CPU usage

Hi All,
We are getting message while generating some reports. Pl. see the Error Text below for message. For time being we have bumped the session limit to unlimited to take care of this problem for now. But the question is u201CIs there a way available in MII to refresh(cycle) the Data source connectionu201D So that the DB session limit can be kept un altered?
When we search this on different forums, we got a solution which we aleady implemented(bumping the session limit to unlimited). But we are looking for a solution from MII side.
Any help will be appreciated
Regards,
Rajesh.
Error Text:
Error occurred while processing data stream, A SQL Error has occurred on query, ORA-02392: exceeded session limit on CPU usage, you are being logged off . com.lighthammer.Illuminator.logging.LHException: Error occurred while processing data stream, A SQL Error has occurred on query, ORA-02392: exceeded session limit on CPU usage, you are being logged off . at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.logging.ErrorHandler.handleError(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.logging.ErrorHandler.handleError(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.connectors.Proxy.Proxy.processRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.services.handlers.IlluminatorService.processRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.services.ServiceManager.runQuery(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.servlet.Illuminator.service(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.servlet.ServletRunner.run(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.servlet.ServletRunner.runAsXmlQuery(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.actions.illuminator.queries.IlluminatorQueryObject.LoadDocument(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.actions.illuminator.queries.IlluminatorQueryObject.Invoke(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.Action.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.ActionSequence.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.ActionSequence.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.Conditional.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.ActionSequence.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.ActionSequence.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.core.ActionSequence.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Process(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.xacute.engine.TransactionEngine.Execute(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.connectors.Xacute.XacuteRequestHandler.processQueryRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.connectors.Xacute.XacuteRequestHandler.QueryRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.connectors.Xacute.XacuteConnector.processRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.services.handlers.IlluminatorService.processRequest(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.services.ServiceManager.runQuery(Unknown Source) at com.lighthammer.Illuminator.servlet.Illuminator.service(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.SERequestDispatcher.forwardServlet(SERequestDispatcher.java:638) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.SERequestDispatcher.forward(SERequestDispatcher.java:236) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.SERequestDispatcher.internalForward(SERequestDispatcher.java:283) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.SEFilterChain.doFilter(SEFilterChain.java:96) at com.lighthammer.cms.system.CMSFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.SEFilterChain.doFilter(SEFilterChain.java:60) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ApplicationInfo.filterApplRequest(ApplicationInfo.java:2159) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ApplicationInfo.processApplRequest(ApplicationInfo.java:1823) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ServerHostInfo.processApplRequest(ServerHostInfo.java:937) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ServletExec.ProcessRequest(ServletExec.java:1091) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ServletExec.ProcessRequest(ServletExec.java:973) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ServletExecService.processServletRequest(ServletExecService.java:167) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.ServletExecService.Run(ServletExecService.java:204) at com.newatlanta.servletexec.HttpServerRequest.run(HttpServerRequest.java:487)

Hi,
Kindly try out the below option from database side.
Error : ORA-02392: exceeded session limit on CPU usage, you are being logged off
Cause : An attempt was made to exceed the maximum CPU usage allowed by the CPU_PER_SESSION clause of the user profile.
Action : If this happens often, ask the database administrator to increase the CPU_PER_SESSION limit of the user profile.
If you looking for solution in MII end,
Check with SAP MII administrator on log files.
Check Data server tab for configuration details. (eg : Pool Size, Pool Max etc)
Kindly let us know the version of SAP MII.
Thanks
Rajesh Sivaprakasam.

Windows 8.1 MDM not responding to more than one SyncML from MDM server per session

Here is the behaviour i see, which was not expected by Windows 8.1.
1) Device is enrolled
2) Client initiates the connection with the MDM server defined in provisioning XML during enrollment.
3) MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
4) Client accepts the commands and sends Status and results.
5) Again MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
6) Client doesn't respond to these commands or not sending any SyncML. Here is the problem that i am referring to.
We are capturing the traffic in fiddler and found that device is not sending the next request where we are expecting the status for these commands.
The same is being repeated in all the requests client initiates. DM Client responds back only for one syncML sent by the MDM server per session.
Is this the expected behaviour with Windows 8.1? Or are we doing something wrong to see this behaviour?
Below is the SyncML for which I am expecting the response from the DM client. (Note: I got the response for the same SyncML in the first connection, but not in the second.)
<SyncML xml:lang="en" xmlns="syncml:SYNCML1.2">
<SyncHdr>
<VerDTD>1.2</VerDTD>
<VerProto>DM/1.2</VerProto>
<SessionID>1</SessionID>
<MsgID>1</MsgID>
<Target>
<LocURI>0</LocURI>
</Target>
<Source>
<LocURI>https://####</LocURI>
<LocName>AfariaWinPhoneProvider</LocName>
</Source>
<RespURI>https://####</RespURI>
</SyncHdr>
<SyncBody>
<Status>
<CmdID>1</CmdID>
<MsgRef>2</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>0</CmdRef>
<Cmd>SyncHdr</Cmd>
<TargetRef>https://####</TargetRef>
<SourceRef>0</SourceRef>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Get>
<CmdID>2</CmdID>
<Item>
<Target>
<LocURI>./cimv2/Win32_ComputerSystemProduct</LocURI>
</Target>
</Item>
</Get>
<Final />
</SyncBody>
</SyncML>

Hello Sreekanth,
I am facing similar issue, here is the behaviour description:
1) Device is enrolled
2) Client initiates the connection with the MDM server defined in provisioning XML during enrollment.
3) MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
4) Client doesn't respond to these commands or not sending any SyncML.
The same is being repeated in all client request.
Below is the SyncML
for which I am expecting the response from the DM client:
<SyncML xmlns="SYNCML:SYNCML1.2">
<SyncHdr>
<VerDTD>1.2</VerDTD>
<VerProto>DM/1.2</VerProto>
<SessionID>1</SessionID>
<MsgID>1</MsgID>
<Target>
<LocURI>9302116</LocURI>
</Target>
<Source>
<LocURI>https://#####</LocURI>
</Source>
</SyncHdr>
<SyncBody>
<Status>
<CmdID>1</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>0</CmdRef>
<Cmd>SyncHdr</Cmd>
<TargetRef>9302116</TargetRef>
<Data>212</Data>
</Status>
<Status>
<CmdID>2</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>2</CmdRef>
<Cmd>Alert</Cmd>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Status>
<CmdID>3</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>3</CmdRef>
<Cmd>Replace</Cmd>
<TargetRef>./devinf12</TargetRef>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Get>
<CmdID>75</CmdID>
<Item>
<Target>
<LocURI>./DevDetail/SwV</LocURI>
</Target>
</Item>
</Get>
</SyncBody>
</SyncML>
Here
we had tried sending
<Target>
<LocURI>0</LocURI>
</Target>
But it didn't worked.

Max-streaming-connections-per-session limit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for