MAXDB issue when upgrading from SP14 to SP15

Hello,
I am trying to upgrade my local WAS to SP15. I am getting the following DB error during the installation (excerpt from callSdmViaSapinst.log file):
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating connections to database "J2E".
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating vendor connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Vendor connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:01... Info: Creating openSQL connection to database.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:03... Info: OpenSQL connection created successfully.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[START]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!HELP[Manual modification of the header may cause parsing problem!]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGGINGVERSION[1.5.3.7186 - 630]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!NAME[C:\usr\sap\J2E\JC00\SDM\program\log\jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!PATTERN[jddilog20060215103203.log]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!FORMATTER[com.sap.dictionary.database.dbs.DbTraceFormatter(%s %m %-30l %24d)]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!ENCODING[Cp1252]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: <!LOGHEADER[END]/>
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbObjectSqlStatements)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Exception caught during SQL execution [-6000] (at 15): Duplicate table name:BC_CMSRTS CREATE TABLE "BC_CMSRTS"("VENDOR" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "NAME" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PROVIDER" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSNAME" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CMSURL" VARCHAR(256) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "TRACKNAME" VARCHAR(8) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SYSTYPE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "LOCATION" VARCHAR(40) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "CONFIGTYPE" VARCHAR(5) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "RELEASE" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "SERVICELEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "PATCHLEVEL" VARCHAR(10) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' , "APPLYTIME" VARCHAR(20) UNICODE DEFAULT ' ' )
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: E R R O R ******* (DbModificationManager)
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: 10:32:04 2006-02-15 dbs-Error: Statements could not be executed successfully
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Aborted: development component 'tc/SL/UTIL_JDD'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'6.4015.00.0000.20051027101403.0000':
No further description found.
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: -
Deployment was successful -
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Info: Summarizing the deployment results:
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\SAPJEECOR15_0.SCA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:05... Error: Admitted: C:\Documents and Settings\DKEISERlocal\My Documents\Portal\installs\WAS15\J2EE-RUNT-CD\J2EE-ENG\OFFLINE\JRFC.SDA
Feb 15, 2006 10:32:06... Error: Processing error. Return code: 4
Have tried everything I know of (restarting, etc.). Also tried to drop the duplicate table and it won't let me. Anyone have any ideas??
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
you could try (re)loading the MaxDB system tables. You can do that using either the Database Manager GUI, or from the commandline:
dbmcli -d <SID> -u <dbm-user>,<pwd> load_systab -u <dba-user>,<pwd> -ud DOMAIN
The standard dbm-user is called 'control', the standard dba-user 'superdba'.
Kind regards,
Roland

Similar Messages

Abap issues when upgrading from 4.7 to ecc6.0

hello All,
I am posting this question with intention of general issues we face that are abap related when upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6.0,
do the programs ahve to be adjusted, if sumone cud also throw some light on what is unicode and wat role does it play in the upgrade,
some specific examples wud be appreciated
thanks,
RS

hi,
Go through this
Unicode is an international standard that assigns characters from virtually every
language and script a unique Unicode Scalar Value, which is a number written in
hexadecimal notation.
     Character     Unicode Scalar Value     Unicode Character Name
     A      U+0041          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
     Ä     U+00C4          LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
     α     U+03B1          GREEK SMALL LATTER ALPHA
Implementing the Unicode standard enables a single software product or a single
web site to be accessed across multiple platforms, languages, and countries without
the need for re-engineering. It allows data to be transferred across many different
SAP and non-SAP systems without corruption. To meet these requirements, the SAP
Unicode team continues to promote Unicode-enabled SAP systems, aid their
installation, and provide tools and full technical support for the smooth
conversion of existing SAP non-Unicode systems to Unicode.

Mail issues when upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion

Hello,
I'm hoping someone out there may be able to answer this question or offer some advice. I am being prompted by Apple to move over to iCloud which requires me upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion. I am extremely reluctant to do this as I have heard of problems when migrating to Lion, especially with Mail. I presently have over 30,000 emails in my inbox. These mails are divided into a multitude of folders all on my mac. I have a mac email account along with other non Apple email accounts (POP) on my Mac. These emails and the folder structure are fundamental to my work so losing any emails or even the folder structure would be disastrous for me. I have of course made a backup (2 in fact) but do like the idea of trying to rebuild everything from scratch. Any advice would be greatly welcomed. Thanks.

I'm no expert but at the moment I just woudn't do it as there appears to be lots of unexplained problems with mail and Lion. I have been a Mac user from the earliest days and have never ever had the kinds of problems I am currently having to work around since installing Lion. I wish I had stayed with Snow Leopard.

Tag issue when upgrading from PSE 7 to 11

I've upgraded from PSE 7 to 11 and the tags for people, while there, do not appear in the "people" section fo PSE11. Any suggestions on how to get them all to show?

In PSE11, people tags have been moved to People view, this view contains all people tags along with categories. In case you want to view them along with tags panel, it can be enabled through View->Show People in Tag panel.

Preformance issues when upgrading from dbxml 2.3.8 to 2.4.13

I have recently upgraded my dbxml distribution from 2.3.8 to 2.4.13 (including the latest patch). I have noticed that many of the queries I issue take longer than they used to. Specifically if the query is complex it takes 10 times as long as it did with 2.3.8. Also I have noted a difference in speed between issuing the query via the dbxml shell (query takes ~45 seconds) vs issuing it through a c++ interface (query takes 4+ minutes). The query am issuing is:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
if I simplify the query by removing references to the obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high nodes:
for $i in collection('projectDatabase.dbxml')/project
where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test']
return $i
it returns much faster. I am wondering if this is an issue with optimization of the complex query?
The database is fully indexed and was re-indexed when I upgraded to 2.4.13

Doug,
I've got your container. It's a wholedoc container with document indexes (a lot of them). Here's what I see for query speeds for your large, slow query using the dbxml shell.
Query is:
query "for $i in collection('pdb.dbxml')/project where $i[obsblock/obsblockStatus eq 'INCOMPLETE' and obsblock/receiverBand eq '3MM' and obsblock/remainingTime >= 1.0 and ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low >= 0.654498) or (obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high <= 2.61799 and obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high >= 0.654498) or (0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high and 0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or ((obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high < obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) and ((0.654498 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (2.61799 <= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@high) or (0.654498 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low) or (2.61799 >= obsblock/reqRaCoverage/@low)))) and obsblock/arrayConfiguration eq 'C' and projectID ne'opnt' and projectID ne'rpnt' and projectID ne'tilt' and projectID ne'fringe' and projectID ne'test'] return $i"
2.3.11 -- 2.4 seconds
2.4.13 -- 60 seconds
That is a significant slowdown and it needs further investigation but is almost certainly related to the fact that it is wholedoc storage. The optimizer appears to be choosing unwisely. This will take a few days to work out.
I also changed the container to be node storage with node indexes and the times went to:
2.3.11 -- 13 sec (slower than wholedoc)
2.4.13 -- 40 sec (faster than wholedoc)
I do know why your application is slower than the dbxml shell. There is a new flag that should almost always be used for wholedoc container queries -- DBXML_DOCUMENT_PROJECTION. Add that to you query excecution.
Another thing -- query preparation is a bit slower in 2.4 so you should use prepared queries whenever possible to amortize that cost.
Regards,
George

Issues when Upgrading from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1

Hi There.
Yesterday I upgraded a client's environment from SRSS 4.1 to 5.2.1.
Environment:
Solaris 10 hosting Sun Ray Server, Kiosk Mode configured with Windows Connector pointing at Windows Server 2003 Terminal Server. Used utadm to remove the old firmware config and reconfigured with the new firmware config. All Thin Clients now have the new Oracle Branded Firmware.
After the Upgrade, the users can't seem to hold down the Backspace Key to erase text at a faster pace or use Page Down in an Excel Spreadsheet to get through their workbooks faster. When these buttons are used in their held down position the performance is really slow. Tapping these keys however works fine.
EG: Tapping backspace 20 times to erase 20 Characters is ok. Holding down the Backspace Key to do the same thing is very slow.
Anyone know of any issues or performance issues Post running this upgrade.
Cheers
- Joe.

have you looked at the following performance tuning?
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Tuning-Performance-Improving-Network-Performance.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25745/html/Troubleshooting-Network-Switches.html
Some other options to consider
-D Disables the video acceleration path for Windows 7 and
Windows 2008 R2.
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-M off
Specify which accelerated media paths to use (supported
only with Windows XP and Windows 2003).
-F off|x11|xvideo|all|keep
Specify which flash acceleration paths to use and
allows to set the flash state to it's initial state
when session is disconnected.
So can't say that his is a bug. All known issues have been fixed by SRS 5.3. If you still have problems, please open a Service Request via My Oracle Support see
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25749_01/E25743/html/Support.html

Webservice publish issue when upgrading from 11.1.1.4.0 to 11.1.2.0.0

Was working fine in 11.1.1.4.0 then I upgraded to 11.1.2.0.0 and now when I click on "Webservice Properties" then go to methods some are grayed out. I click the "Why Not?" button and it says.
There was an error validating the SEI, but no specific error messages were reported.
Go back, open the same project up in 1.1.1.4.0 and no problems. I even cut the service down to one simple method to publish and still get the error.
Any ideas?
Edited by: bartmc on Aug 26, 2011 11:24 AM

I have the identical issue. Is there any solution? I am o on a clean install of 11.1.2.1 and it is doing this. If I add another dummy method to the class, I can get one step further and select the method I want, but then I get the same SEI error.

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

How to transfer data & apps,When upgrading from a iPhone 3G to an iPhone 4 or soon 5

When upgrading from a iPhone 3G to an iPhone 4 or soon 5
How to transfer all phone number and apps and notes, pretty much copy my old iPhone to my new iPhone , all content and apps.
Will it transfer my text messages also?
Is this a nightmare or an easy task?

Connect to iTunes and backup. Then when you receive the new phone restore from that backup.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1766
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1414

JMS issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5

We are facing some issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5
In weblogic 9.2 :_
BMP Entity EJBs used in our project are read-only in nature using entity cache, below is the configuration details
<!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB//EN" "http://www.bea.com/servers/wls600/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd">
<weblogic-ejb-jar>
<weblogic-enterprise-bean>
<ejb-name>
Company
</ejb-name>
<entity-descriptor>
<pool>
<max-beans-in-free-pool>300</max-beans-in-free-pool>
<initial-beans-in-free-pool>150</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
</pool>
<entity-cache>
<max-beans-in-cache>3500</max-beans-in-cache>
<idle-timeout-seconds>100000</idle-timeout-seconds>
<read-timeout-seconds>0</read-timeout-seconds>
<concurrency-strategy>ReadOnly</concurrency-strategy>
</entity-cache>
Entity beans will get refreshed using the JMS messges. with in the MDB descriptor files(weblogic-ejb-jar.xml) we are using the provider URL directly and XA enabled connection factory is set to false.
migration to Weblogic 10.3.5_
With the same configurations MDB are not not getting deployed in weblogic 10 with some exception, so we removed the provider URL from weblogic-ejb-jar.xml and changed the JMS configuration to use foreign JMS and XA enable connection factory is set to true. Now when ever the JMS message is triggered Entity bean is not getting refreshed with the updated values. i.e values are stale.
Can some one look into this and provide your inputs to resolve this issue.

I think the Entity bean refresh problem appears to be unrelated to MDBs. The MDB is only responsible for getting the message to your application (which in turn interacts with Entity beans). You might want to try posting your question to an EJB newsgroup.
Tom

Error ORA-03113 when upgrading from 11.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3

I keep on getting this error when upgrading from 11.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:28.207 CEST ] [SummarizableStep.genSummary:409] Generating Summary for:=Pre Upgrade ,status is:=Successful
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:28.208 CEST ] [SummarizableStep.genSummary:409] Generating Summary for:=Oracle Server ,status is:=Failed
oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.StepExecutionException: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
Upgrade failed due to running the step "Upgrading Oracle Server"
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.SubComponent.executeSubStepImpl(SubComponent.java:738)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.SubComponent.executeStepImpl(SubComponent.java:585)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.Component.executeStepImpl(Component.java:317)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.SummarizableStep.executeImpl(SummarizableStep.java:183)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.BasicStep.execute(BasicStep.java:210)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.Step.execute(Step.java:140)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.StepContext$ModeRunner.run(StepContext.java:2708)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637)
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:28.209 CEST ] [SummarizableStep.executeImpl:212] Throwing exception e from SummarizableStep
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:28.209 CEST ] [BasicStep.configureSettings:304] messageHandler being set=oracle.sysman.assistants.util.UIMessageHandler@4805e9f1
oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.StepExecutionException: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
Upgrade failed due to running the step "Upgrading Oracle Server"
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.SubComponent.executeSubStepImpl(SubComponent.java:738)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.SubComponent.executeStepImpl(SubComponent.java:585)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.component.Component.executeStepImpl(Component.java:317)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.dbma.backend.SummarizableStep.executeImpl(SummarizableStep.java:183)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.BasicStep.execute(BasicStep.java:210)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.Step.execute(Step.java:140)
        at oracle.sysman.assistants.util.step.StepContext$ModeRunner.run(StepContext.java:2708)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637)
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:31.000 CEST ] [CompManager.isModeSet:9822]   DB Upgrade Mode Setting := 1
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:31.001 CEST ] [CompManager.isModeSet:9823]   Mode := 1 is set
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:31.001 CEST ] [SQLEngine.done:2189] Done called
[Thread-57] [ 2012-04-20 13:18:31.001 CEST ] [Database.getStepSQLInterface:787] OH in database: /app/oracle/product/11.2.0.3/db_1Any clues about what could be wrong? I am planning to upgrade with the manual steps if it does not work :(

Pl post OS details - are you using DBUA to upgrade ? Are there any errors in the database alert log ?
ORA-00600 [kodpunp-nulltds], ORA-00600 [kokeeiix1], [600] When Upgrading To 11GR2 [ID 1367827.1]
HTH
Srini

When upgrading from OS X lion to OS X mountain lion will it automatically uninstall OS X lion

when upgrading from OS X lion to OS X mountain lion will it automatically uninstall OS X lion?

Yes. You download Mountain Lion from the App Store and, once the download is complete, the installation of Mountain Lion will begin. You can quit it at this point and backup the "Install OS Mountain Lion.app" (which I suggest) the double-click it and begin the installation.
All remnants of Lion will be gone and you'll be running Mountain Lion.
Good luck,
Clinton

Has anyone else noticed that: "The OS X Lion v10.7.3 Update includes Safari 5.1.3 and fixes that: Resolve a Wi-Fi connection issue when waking from sleep" didn't work?

I installed OS X Lion v10.7.3 because of the following claim.
The OS X Lion v10.7.3 Update includes Safari 5.1.3 and fixes that:
Resolve a Wi-Fi connection issue when waking from sleep
It continues to be a real pain having to reconnect to the network each time I wake my MacBook Air from sleep.
Does anyone have a suggestion for the resolution to this problem?

It seems the update fixed old problems for some and caused new problems for others. Sorry to hear you're in the latter group.
Here are some things to try.
1. Go to System Preferences > Network, and click the gear icon under the network interfaces like so:
Whatever service order you have set, drag Wi-Fi either to the top (assuming it's not already there) or someplace else in the list. Click OK and then Apply. Sleep the system then wake it again to observe any changes.
2. Click Wi-Fi in the above then click Advanced. Select all the networks your computer has ever joined and delete them with the "-" button. OK then Apply again. Select your network under the AirPort icon to re-join it. Sleep and wake again to see if that did anything.
3. Try creating a new, temporary user account. Log in under that account to see if its behavior is any different.
You may have done all of these already but perhaps there is something you have not thought of. If nothing helps we may just have to wait a bit longer for Apple to release a fix.

Best practice for Smartview when upgrading from Excel 2003 to Excel 2007?

Does anyone know the best pratice for Smartview when upgrading from Excel 2003 to Excel 2007?
Current users have Microsoft Excel 2003 with Smartview 9.3.1.2.1.003.
Computers are being upgraded to Microsoft Excel 2007.
What is the best pratice for Smartview in this situation?
1. Do nothing with Smartview and just install Excel 2007.
2. Install Excel 2007 and then uninstall and reinstall Smartview
3. Uninstall Smartview, Install Excel 2007, and then install Smartview
4. Somthing else??
Thanks!

We went with option 1 and it worked out fine. Be aware that SV processes noticeably slower in Excel 2007 than 2003. Many users were/are unhappy with the switch. We haven't tested SV v11 yet, so I'm not sure if it has improved performance with Excel 2007 or not (hopefully it does).

MAXDB issue when upgrading from SP14 to SP15

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for