Maximum connections reached

Hi ,
I got an issue in Performance testing. we are not using connection pooling in clinet side. I want to check how many connections still opened , which class it opened when i got Maximum connectioned reached exception. Kindly let me know if any body have idea to solve this .
Thanks in Advance,
Javamine

javamine wrote:
... Performance testing. We are not using connection pooling on client side.
I want to check how many connections are open, which class it opened when i got Maximum connections reached exception.
... anybody have idea to solve this. In the client add code to keep track of how many connections are open
and display this and a stacktrace when you get Maximum Connections Reached Exception.
Even if you were using connection pooling
the database can still reject connections above a certain number of concurrent connections.

Similar Messages

Socket maximum connections reached

hi,
i got this error since fews days. And i do not know what to do with.
java.net.SocketException: No buffer space available (maximum connections reached?): connect
thanks
Herve

How many connections do you need? Are you closing them properly?
file:///D:/Java/jdk1.4.0/docs/api/java/net/ServerSocket.html#ServerSocket(int,%20int)

ORA - Maximum Connections Reached

Dear All
Even after implementing Connection pooling in our Application , we very often get this error "150 process exceede- Maximum Connection reached" ? How do we handle this? Our application is about to GoLive in another month .Please help us.
Thanks
AKS

It was simple to plan a download calendar in the case of exceeding maximum connections.
I think this rerolve.
1-"In this momment isn't not possible too manny connections"
2-Please your type of modem: xpto / xpt1 / xpt2 / etc...
3-Calculating 'tracert time'
3-Calculating time max: x minutes min: y minutes
4-Plan a download time:
TODAY DD1/MM1/YYYY1
-HOURS-
10 -
11 -
12
13 -
DD1/MM1/YYYY1
10
11 -
12 -
13
14
15 -
DD1/MM1/YYYY1
10
11
12
13 -
14 -
15
..

Application Maximum Connection Reached

Hi there,
I have installed a new Application Server and I have my forms and reports running on it. My users have receive an error as above. It seems the AS can only allow 20 max concurrent user?
How can i enlarge it? My server should be able to cater to more than that.
Thanks

It was simple to plan a download calendar in the case of exceeding maximum connections.
I think this rerolve.
1-"In this momment isn't not possible too manny connections"
2-Please your type of modem: xpto / xpt1 / xpt2 / etc...
3-Calculating 'tracert time'
3-Calculating time max: x minutes min: y minutes
4-Plan a download time:
TODAY DD1/MM1/YYYY1
-HOURS-
10 -
11 -
12
13 -
DD1/MM1/YYYY1
10
11 -
12 -
13
14
15 -
DD1/MM1/YYYY1
10
11
12
13 -
14 -
15
..

I can't enter a Site. Ihere is only a message: "Maximum number of open connections reached."

If i want to go to a Site, i recive this: "Maximum number of open connections reached.
" other Browser work. I have the Problem only with Firefox.

Check the connection settings.
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Advanced : Network : Connection > Settings
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Options+window+-+Advanced+panel
If you do not need to use a proxy to connect to internet then select "Use the system proxy settings" setting or select "No Proxy".
See "Firefox connection settings":
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+cannot+load+websites+but+other+programs+can

ISA 2006 slow response, connections timeout, maximum limit reached?

Hey guys,
I've been having an issue with a client's ISA Server for the past couple of weeks and haven't been able to understand why this is happening.
They have a couple of ISA Servers Enterprise Edition in an array. This ISA Servers give Internet access to the entire company. They have significant amount of traffic through a Cisco Iron Port that all the users proxy settings are configured to this device
and the Iron Port forwards the requests to the ISA Servers.
This implementation have been working fine for months, until a few weeks back that started to have slow response problems from the ISA Servers. Analyzing the reports from the ISA Servers, I've noticed an increased amount of traffic a few times this
has happened and mostly from the Iron Port. The Cisco people says this increase amount is due to the fact that the ISA Server stops responding and new requests are made at the moment from the device. We have configured the Iron port IP in the exceptions of
the Flood Mitigation Settings of the ISA Server, and configure it to take more than 20,000 connections.
Still after this configuration, the same problem raised a couple of days back. The ISA Servers stops responding and they need to be forced shut down and restarted to get them back to work.
There are also some errors from some other internal IPs that it reaches maximum connection limits, but these are about 10 errors like this only. I was thinking maybe there are some infected computers or something but they said that they scanned the ones
that show the errors and nothing is detected.
From the ISA reports of the time of the incident, I saw that it reached more than 15,000 concurrent connections. More than double of what it usually handles throughout the day.
I don't know if there is like a connection limit that the ISA can handle before it hangs of something?
Is there any ideas on what can be happening with this?
Thanks for any replies!
Eduardo Rojas

Hi,
Have you check the Event logs on the ISA Server? Any error?
You could use ISABPA to do some basic troubleshootings.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-hk/download/details.aspx?id=811
Best Regards,
Joyce
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

ASA5510 - Maximum connect time

Quick question. I have configured the "Maximum Connect Time" as unlimited in my group policy but when a connection is established it shows a "Conn Time Out: 120 minutes".
The connection does get dropped with this timer. Any idea how to actually make it unlimited and why it get sets to 120?
I having a problem with SSL phone clients dropping throughout the day and think this may be the cause.
Thanks

I ended up rebooting the ASA this morning and it fixed the issue. Right away the timeout changed to what I had configured it to be and I was also able to make changes.
Here's the response from TAC. Thanks for helping with this. Much appreciated.
"I am glad that the issue was resolved on a reboot. Might be that svc sessions were stuck in the memory for some reason and the same sessions would be invoked every time you connected rather than tearing it down and creating a new svc session.
Once rebooted I believe the sessions stuck in memory were cleared and new sessions came up as a result the issue vanished. I shall surely update you as I have an update from the devs on this."

LDAP "ServerListener" stops responding (Max number of connections reached)

Hi --
The last four work days, in the evening, our OAS 10G server stopped processing portal logon requests. The response to login requests was this message:
Internal error WWC-00006 Unexpected error
encountered in wwsec_app_priv.process)signon
(User-Defined Exception) (WWC-41417)
An exception was raised when accessing the
Oracle Internet Directory 81: Can't contact
LDAP server. Details:
Operation dbms_ldap.simple_bind_s (The message also included other details such as the host, port and DN, and a reference to error message WWC-41743.)
Suspecting an LDAP problem, we looked on the server, and in ORACLE_HOME/LDAP/LOG I found recent log files (oidldapd[instance]s[pid].log) with several megs of messages that look like this:
2005/06/17:17:59:33 * ServerListener :2 * ERROR :
ServerListener : Max numbers of connections reached.
Num Conns = 874, Max Conns = 874, Closing the
connection. These messages repeated, several times per minute, overnight and the next day until I restarted the server. The same thing happened again the next night.
A metalink search pointed to docid "293391.1" which, in part, suggests that the problem may be caused by improper programming, and that the solution may be to, "investigate the applications that connect to OID and where possible modify them to perform an explicit disconnect."
Does anyone have any reference to how an application can perform an explicit disconnect from the OID? We do have a relatively new application which follows the "Java API for Oracle Internet Directory" -- documention found here: http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/network.920/a96577/oid_java.htm -- but in that document we cannot find any reference for how to "perform an explicit disconnect".
The application already calls the "context.close()" method, which according to the documentation closes the connection to the OID, but we cannot find any other "explicit disconnect". And, since the problem happens even though our app is already calling the context.close(), there must be something else.
Opened this up as a Metalink question related to Portal, but they said it's not their problem, and we should ask over here.
Any thoughts?

Looks like that's helped. While the errors persist, OID isn't dieing.
For anyone with similar problems, it looks like docid 437493.1 is useful. Upgrade clients to at least 10.2.0.3 to defeat a sqlnet problem.
Just tried it with the 10.2.0.5 patchset and it seems to be working and not generating the 104 error on the OID server.

Maximum connections allowed for AMS 5.0.1

How can I find out the maximum connection allowed for adobe media server 5.0.1 standard license?

...that would depend on your application.
For a one-way video-on-demand system that streams recorded video at the user's request. Adobe Media Server serves only one stream to each user.
Here are the bandwidth calculations you would make:
Calculating server bandwidth needs (BWs):
BWs = N × S
where N = number of simultaneous users (subscribers)
and S = average bitrate of encoded A/V content
For example to calculate the overall server bandwidth needed to stream video encoded at 500 Kbps to 1000 simultaneous users:
500 Mbps = 1000 × 500 Kbps
The above assumes that content is encoded at a constant bitrate. Most often, however, you will vary the bitrate of the content to suit the viewing audience. This affects your bandwidth needs at both the client and server level.
For example, suppose you estimated that half of the 1000 simultaneous users were going to connect via 350 Kbps DSL modem and the other half via 3 Mbps cable modem. Suppose further that while the video encoded at 500 Kbps was appropriate for the cable viewers, you wanted to encode a separate video at 150 Kbps for the DSL modem users.
In this case, the total bandwidth required of the system is lowered to 325 Mbps:
325 Mbps = (500 Kbps × 500) + (150 Kbps × 500)
This help ?

OID Max numbers of connections reached.

OID version 9.0.4.1.0. There're constant error messages '* ServerListener:2 * ERROR : ServerListener : Max numbers of connections reached. Num Conns
= 900, Max Conns = 900, Closing the connection." in the ldap.log file, but netstat -a|grep port|wc -l always return connections lower than 150.
I'd like to know what caused the error message being populated. Thanks

Looks like that's helped. While the errors persist, OID isn't dieing.
For anyone with similar problems, it looks like docid 437493.1 is useful. Upgrade clients to at least 10.2.0.3 to defeat a sqlnet problem.
Just tried it with the 10.2.0.5 patchset and it seems to be working and not generating the 104 error on the OID server.

## NEED HELP ## Weblogic Managed Server Holding Maximum Connections

In one of our weblogic setup, we have weblogic cluster with 4 members. This cluster has been setup with 2 physical servers, each server having 2 cluser members like below...
Host Server 1 : ManagedServer1:7003, ManagedServer2:7004
Host Server2 : ManagedServer3:7003, ManagedServer4:7004
Cluster member of ManagedServer1:7003 holding maximum connection to HostServer2 and same cluser member of ManagedServer3:7003 holding maximum connection with HostServer1.
As my assumption, since members are in cluster, heartbeat between the members (Host Server 1 : ManagedServer1:7003 and Host Server2 : ManagedServer3:7003) are holding the connections.
Currently each managed server 8000 to 10000 connections holding as ESTABLISHED.
Please let me know, what may be the reason, but other members of same cluster are fuctionality fine.

Hi Sujit,
after executing lsof command, we found below results....and we are unware of afs3-vlserver...this is taking maximum number of connections....
SERVER 1
lsof -i :7003
7003 : fcr_server2
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
java 4744 oracle 532u IPv6 359952122 TCP server1:33586->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 736u IPv6 321513088 TCP server1:46983->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 762u IPv6 321513090 TCP server1:46985->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 765u IPv6 322352894 TCP server1:62305->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 769u IPv6 321512933 TCP server1:46851->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 770u IPv6 321513092 TCP server1:46987->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 771u IPv6 321560765 TCP server1:65309->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 777u IPv6 321560752 TCP server1:65296->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 780u IPv6 321560759 TCP server1:65303->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 782u IPv6 321560747 TCP server1:65292->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
java 4744 oracle 783u IPv6 321560758 TCP server1:65302->server2:afs3-vlserver (ESTABLISHED)
SERVER 2
lsof -i :7003
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
java 14332 oracle 720u IPv6 129183836 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:46985 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 751u IPv6 129207449 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:65309 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 775u IPv6 129183781 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:46983 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 778u IPv6 129183849 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:46987 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 780u IPv6 129374814 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:20099 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 783u IPv6 129207310 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:65289 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 786u IPv6 129207343 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:65303 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 787u IPv6 154651528 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:35492 (ESTABLISHED)
java 14332 oracle 792u IPv6 129207347 TCP server2:afs3-vlserver->server1:65304 (ESTABLISHED)
Please let us know about this....
Thanks

RFC Adapter CC Maximum connection.

Hi Experts,
In our scenario in RFC Communication channel the maximum connection parameters is blank. In that field there not specified any figure. so please can you tell me in that case how many connections it will take by default.
Regards
Prabhakar.A

HI,
Per day in my scenario nearly 600 files will process. RFC used for RFC lookup by passing the country code to ecc system that ecc system is generate the sequential number and send it to the XI system mapping. some times the sequential number is not getting to the target field. can you please sugest me the solution.
Regards,
Prabhakar.A

SCOM 2007 - SharePoint 2007: Maximum connections counter

Hello,
I am trying to locate the "Maximum connections counter" for SharePoint 2007 using SCOM 2007. I don't see it so far!!!
"Web Service - Maximum Connections" does not show anywhere any idea?
Thanks,
Dom
System Center Operations Manager 2007 / System Center Configuration Manager 2007 R2 / Forefront Client Security / Forefront Identity Manager

The object is Web Service, which then has several different counters, which then might have several instances.
If this performance object is something you want to monitor for, and it is not included in the mp, then you just need to create a performance monitor or collection rule, depending on what you want to do with the data.
The Exchange 2013 MP, for example, has no performance collection rules. So it's very possible, while the product group wanted to include everything most people need, they could have forgotten or were just not able to do so before they had to release
the mp. The MOSS 2007 MP has been around for years, was never updated, and isn't one of the better mps from MSFT. So if you want to extend it with a custom management pack, or just add something via the console, then you should be fine.
Regards, Blake Email: mengotto<at>hotmail.com Blog: http://discussitnow.wordpress.com/ If my response was helpful, please mark it as so, if it answered your question, then please also mark it accordingly. Thank you.

Maximum Connections Oracle can provide

I have this query, how many maximum connections does oracle provide to any applications server.
I am aware that the number of connections are configurable. But i wanted to know the maximum number of connections after which there is a possibilty of oracle to crash, or after these particular number connectins oracle wont support any more connections.
Please help me with this, as im in desperate need of a solution.
Thanx for your time.
Nikhil

There is no functional limit to the number of connections Oracle can support. There may be some internal limit (i.e. session ID may be an integer, which would limit you to 4 billion connections on a 32-bit system) but I've never heard of anyone actually hitting such a limit. In reality, you will be constrained by your hardware long before you are constrained by Oracle.
Unfortunately, estimating how many connections your particular hardware can support is not trivial. It depends, obviously, on your hardware, but it also depends on your application and on how your database is configured-- shared server vs. dedicated server would be the largest factor here.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

Javax.resource.spi.ResourceAdapterInternalException: max connections reache

Hello,
I am writing an application to read messages from queues.
Everything seems to be working fine, but after a number of un-deployments and deployments I start getting the following exception and have no choice but to restart the application server.
Any hint on what the root cause might be?
Exception stack trace:
2008-02-15 14:47:19,095 WARN [org.jboss.system.ServiceController:424] Problem starting service jboss.j2ee:ear=Application-1.0.ear,jar=Application-1.0.jar,name=MDB,service=EJB3
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Endpoint activation failed ra=jboss.jca:service=RARDeployment,name='wmq.jmsra.rar' activationSpec=javax.jms.Queue:wsmq/Q@@localhost; - nested throwable: (javax.resource.spi.ResourceAdapterInternalException: max connections reached)
     at org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException.rethrowAsDeploymentException(DeploymentException.java:53)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.inflow.JBossMessageEndpointFactory.activate(JBossMessageEndpointFactory.java:310)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.inflow.JBossMessageEndpointFactory.start(JBossMessageEndpointFactory.java:194)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.MessagingContainer.startProxies(MessagingContainer.java:190)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.MessagingContainer.start(MessagingContainer.java:156)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.MDB.start(MDB.java:126)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor90.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.ServiceDelegateWrapper.startService(ServiceDelegateWrapper.java:103)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalStart(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:289)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalLifecycle(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:245)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:978)
     at $Proxy0.start(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:417)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:435)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor10.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
     at $Proxy361.start(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.JmxKernelAbstraction.install(JmxKernelAbstraction.java:120)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.Ejb3Deployment.registerEJBContainer(Ejb3Deployment.java:301)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.Ejb3Deployment.start(Ejb3Deployment.java:362)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.Ejb3Module.startService(Ejb3Module.java:91)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalStart(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:289)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalLifecycle(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:245)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:978)
     at $Proxy0.start(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:417)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor10.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
     at $Proxy34.start(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.EJB3Deployer.start(EJB3Deployer.java:512)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:133)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:142)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.DynamicInterceptor.invoke(DynamicInterceptor.java:97)
     at org.jboss.system.InterceptorServiceMBeanSupport.invokeNext(InterceptorServiceMBeanSupport.java:238)
     at org.jboss.wsf.container.jboss42.DeployerInterceptor.start(DeployerInterceptor.java:87)
     at org.jboss.deployment.SubDeployerInterceptorSupport$XMBeanInterceptor.start(SubDeployerInterceptorSupport.java:188)
     at org.jboss.deployment.SubDeployerInterceptor.invoke(SubDeployerInterceptor.java:95)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
     at $Proxy35.start(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.start(MainDeployer.java:1025)
     at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.start(MainDeployer.java:1015)
     at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:819)
     at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:782)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor21.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:133)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:142)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
     at $Proxy10.deploy(Unknown Source)
     at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.deploy(URLDeploymentScanner.java:421)
     at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.scan(URLDeploymentScanner.java:634)
     at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.doScan(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:263)
     at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.loop(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:274)
     at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.run(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:225)
Caused by: javax.resource.spi.ResourceAdapterInternalException: max connections reached
     at com.ibm.mq.connector.ResourceAdapterConnectionPool.allocateConnection(ResourceAdapterConnectionPool.java:231)
     at com.ibm.mq.connector.ResourceAdapterImpl.endpointActivation(ResourceAdapterImpl.java:333)
     at org.jboss.resource.deployment.RARDeployment.endpointActivation(RARDeployment.java:271)
     at org.jboss.resource.deployment.RARDeployment.internalInvoke(RARDeployment.java:226)
     at org.jboss.system.ServiceDynamicMBeanSupport.invoke(ServiceDynamicMBeanSupport.java:156)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.RawDynamicInvoker.invoke(RawDynamicInvoker.java:164)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.JmxClientKernelAbstraction.invoke(JmxClientKernelAbstraction.java:44)
     at org.jboss.ejb3.mdb.inflow.JBossMessageEndpointFactory.activate(JBossMessageEndpointFactory.java:305)
     ... 101 more
ObjectName: jboss.j2ee:ear=Application-1.0.ear,jar=Application-1.0.jar,name=MDB,service=EJB3
State: FAILED
Reason: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Endpoint activation failed ra=jboss.jca:service=RARDeployment,name='wmq.jmsra.rar' activationSpec=javax.jms.Queue:wsmq/Q@@localhost; - nested throwable: (javax.resource.spi.ResourceAdapterInternalException: max connections reached)My current configuration is:
- JBoss 4.2.2-GA (linux)
- WS MQ 6.0.2.2 (linux)
I have configured JBoss the following way:
- added wmq.jmsra.rar to the $JBOSS_SERVER/deploy directory
- added com.ibm.mqetclient.jar to the $JBOSS_SERVER/lib directory
- created $JBOSS_SERVER/deploy/wmq.jmsra-ds.xml as follows
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<connection-factories>

<mbean code="org.jboss.resource.deployment.AdminObject" name="jca.wmq:name=wsmqQ">
    <attribute name="JNDIName">wsmq/Q</attribute>
    <depends optional-attribute-name="RARName">jboss.jca:service=RARDeployment,name='wmq.jmsra.rar'</depends>
    <attribute name="Type">javax.jms.Queue</attribute>
    <attribute name="Properties">
      baseQueueManagerName=QM1
      baseQueueName=Q
    </attribute>
</mbean>

<tx-connection-factory>
    <jndi-name>MQCF</jndi-name>
    <xa-transaction />
    <rar-name>wmq.jmsra.rar</rar-name>
   <connection-definition>javax.jms.ConnectionFactory</connection-definition>
    <config-property name="channel" type="java.lang.String">SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN</config-property>
    <config-property name="hostName" type="java.lang.String">127.0.0.1</config-property>
    <config-property name="port" type="java.lang.String">1414</config-property>
    <config-property name="queueManager" type="java.lang.String">QM1</config-property>
    <config-property name="transportType" type="java.lang.String">CLIENT</config-property>
</tx-connection-factory>My java MDB (EJB3) is:
@MessageDriven(name = "MDB", activationConfig = {
        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destination", propertyValue = "wsmq/Q"),
        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue"),
        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "transportType", propertyValue = "CLIENT"),
        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "useJNDI", propertyValue = "true"),
        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "maxPoolDepth", propertyValue = "1") }, messageListenerInterface = MessageListener.class)
@ResourceAdapter("wmq.jmsra.rar")
public class MDB implements MessageListener {
    public void onMessage(Message message) {
        return;
}Thanks in advance for any information!
cheers!

hi
this is known to IBM as APAR IC54346 - fixed in pack 6.0.2.3

Maximum connections reached

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for