Maximum data rate

Good Evening, 
We recently had a VDSL connection installed to upgrade our speeds from 6mb to around 15mbps on a good day. 
BT Wholesale says the IP Profile is 14.12mbps but the maximum data rate on the hub stats is much higher. Could someone help with this please. 
And just to say its good to be back on the forums again. 
Kind regards, 
Dominic
Here are the stats:
5. VDSL uptime:
3 days, 13:25:37
6. Data rate:
1296 / 14583
7. Maximum data rate:
1629 / 23612
8. Noise margin:
6.2 / 6.2
9. Line attenuation:
0.0 / 31.4

dombullion wrote:
how do my stats look. could i be getting faster speeds?
 VDSL uptime:
4 days, 07:07:57
6. Data rate:
1296 / 14583
7. Maximum data rate:
1691 / 23990
8. Noise margin:
6.4 / 6.3
9. Line attenuation:
0.0 / 31.4
10. Signal attenuation:
0.0 / 25.5
No it looks like you are getting the best speed, your Noise Margin is near 6db which is the minumum the connection likes to be at, it appears that DLM is doing its job right.

Similar Messages

  • Upload Maximum Date Rate Lower Than Upload Data Ra...

    Hello there,
    I have just brought up my BT Home Hub 5 stats and my upload data rate is higher than my upload maximum date rate. Is this normal? My upload noise margin has dropped to 4.9 - 5.1 dB. I've had BT Infinity just over 2 days and was wondering if this was normal for FTTC connections?
    Many thanks,
    William

    normally the data rate will be lower than max data rate but yours is that close I would not bother unless it starts to affect your connection which is unlikely
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Ipad 2 video data rate. Whats the maximum data rate it can play back?

    I'm creating a video file I want to play in 1920 x 1080 on the ipad 2 and not sure what the maximum data rate should be.

    Frankiedude wrote:
    I'm creating a video file I want to play in 1920 x 1080 on the ipad 2 and not sure what the maximum data rate should be.
    Depends upon the format of the video. See:
    http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/

  • Maximum data rate RT host can handle (sbRIO 9602)

    Hi all, i got a sbRIO 9602,
    in my application FPGA reads data from custom module @ 1Mhz, just i'm wondering if 
    RT host has the capability to read data and visualize it on a graph without losing samples.
    I just want to know this before look how to implement any Bufferized/Producer consumer/DMA transfer 'cause
    if RT host can't simply manage this data rate i will have soon or later buffer overflow.
    Until now what i've thought is to copy 1000 contiguous samples in a memory in a ONE SHOT way, reading this memory from RT Host and visualize it on a waveform Graph.
    But again if there is the possibility to show acquired data continuously is obviously better.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi, thank you all for your suggestions.
    In my RT Host i read 10000 values in every cycle so data rate drops to 1Mhz/10000 ->100Hz i think.
    What i want to do know is to detect peaks in my data and create an histogram of that peaks in RT.
    I've placed a peak detector VI that takes as input my array of 10000 values and generate an array with only peaks but i don't understand how to use Histogram PtByPt VI. It works with single data value at a time so to generate a consistent histogram i should wait 10000 cycles and so it may not  be as fast as 100Hz .
    Previuously i've tried to detect peaks and generate Histogram directly on FPGA to be sure to be as fast as possible due to 1Mhz data acquiring, but now with 10000 values chunk i guess if i can realize this on RT host side .
    Any suggestion will be really appreciated.

  • Data Rate V Maximum data rate

    Can anyone tell me if my speed will increase due to DLM if my max data rate continues to climb.  I used to have 70meg downstream no problem, but after lots of attempts to get BT to resolve an issue left it (thought I would just let my contract expire) when it dropped to 57 max.  Now the max data rate has increased from 65000 to the value below.  As a result, my speeds have increased to upto 62 down again.  There is however a big discrepancy between the two figures, does this mean my speed will continue to increase if it continues upwards accordingly?  Why the big difference between the two?
    Thanks in advance.

    Within 10 days if the cause has been fixed, I'd say
    If you found this post helpful, please click on the star on the left
    If not, I'll try again

  • Data rate stuck at 35000

    I'm guessing its either the DLM, a fault or a combination of both.  In the lead-up to this I was getting a lot ofseemingly DNS related errors last week - so not sure if this has influenced the DLM - certain web-pages would pause substantially before loading etc
    BT Infinity 2 - installed in April
    HH5 never seems to last more than about a day without rebooting/renegotiating, but speed has always stayed at 44-46mb and the 2 noise margins are always between 6.0-6.2
    now though - my negotiated speed has dropped to a strangely "round" 350000 and my noise margin is way up - assumingly showing there is still margin for it to be negotiated faster - so why 35000 ?
    any help appreciated - thanks
    1. Product name: BT Home Hub
    2. Serial number: +068343+NQ41060163
    3. Firmware version: Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.173.1.6 (Type A) Last updated 10/05/14
    4. Board version: BT Hub 5A
    5. VDSL uptime: 0 days, 00:16:13
    6. Data rate: 12627 / 35000
    7. Maximum data rate: 12638 / 49739
    8. Noise margin: 6.0 / 8.4
    9. Line attenuation: 0.0 / 20.8
    10. Signal attenuation: 0.0 / 20.2
    <edit> just found this when searching for faults on my line - so perhaps the work on the below has caused the drop ?
    Reported Thu 04/12/2014 at 10:09 PM
    Issue Ended Fri 05/12/2014 at 12:33 PM
    We've fixed the recent problem in your area. To get your broadband running smoothly again, restart your BT Home Hub. Just turn it off at the mains, wait a few seconds, then turn it back on again. Give it a couple of minutes to finish starting up.

    Are BT still using DLM now then ?  See :-
    https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity-Speed-Connection/Court-case-forces-Openreach-to-turn-off-Dyn...
    http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6726-assia-court-case-forces-openreach-to-turn-off-dlm.html
    Best regards,
    dfenceman

  • H.264 All-Intra Data Rates Significantly Higher

    Does the built-in H.264 codec encode I-frame only files differently? I am trying to determine the optimal GOP length for high bitrate exports. Image quality seems to degrade, even in the I-frames, when using key frame distances greater than one.
    After performing a series of tests to characterize the Adobe H.264 encoder, I discovered that exported files are significantly larger when key frame distance equals one frame (N=1). The average video data rate for a test file rendered with the Adobe H.264 encoder is as follows:
    N=1 : 2.17 bpp : 24I
    N=2 : 0.66 bpp : 12I + 12P
    N=3 : 0.59 bpp : 8I + 8B + 8P
    Note how the data rate drops 70% (from 2.17 to 0.66 bpp) even though 50% of the I-frames still exist when N=2. By comparison, here is the video data rate when exporting with QuickTime H.264:
    N=1 : 0.89 bpp : 24I
    N=2 : 0.70 bpp : 12I + 12P
    N=3 : 0.64 bpp : 8I + 16P
    The following chart shows data rates at key frame distances from 1-48 frames for Adobe H.264, QuickTime H.264 (via Adobe), QuickTime Pro, and Expression Encoder 4 Pro. Data rates are consistent among all encoders at GOP lengths greater than one. There is an anomoly with the Adobe H.264 codec compressing all-intra files.
    The observed behavior occurs in all profiles, which were tested at Levels 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, and 5.1:
    Image quality is better in the Adobe H.264 all-intraframe file, especially with respect to detail retention. The pictures below show sections of two consecutive frames magnified 400%. The file with N=2 is less accurate and contains noticeable blocking. Even the I-frames don't look as good in the files where N>1.
    The test file was a seventeen second Premiere Pro sequence consisting of H.264, MPEG-2, and AE files with effects applied. Exports were rendered from the Premiere Pro timeline and from a V210 uncompressed 4:2:2 intermediate file of the sequence. The following settings were used:
    Format: H.264
    Width: 1280
    Height: 720
    Frame Rate: 24 fps
    Field Order: Progressive
    Aspect: Square Pixels (1.0)
    TV Standard: NTSC
    Profile: Baseline, Main, and High
    Levels: 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1
    Render at Maximum Bit Depth: Enabled
    Bitrate Encoding: VBR, 2-Pass
    Target Bitrate: Maximized for each Profile/Level
    Maximum Bitrate: Maximized for each Profile/Level
    Key Frame Distance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 48
    Use Maximum Render Quality: Enabled
    Multiplexer: MP4
    Stream Capability: Standard
    Software:
    Adobe Media Encoder CS6 Creative Cloud v6.0.3.1 (64-bit)
    Premiere Pro CS6 Creative Cloud v6.0.3
    Windows 7 SP1
    QuickTime Pro for Windows v7.6.9 (1680.9)
    MediaInfo 0.7.62 (for GOP and data rate information)

    I think the short answer is yes,
    a h.264 encoder does I-frame only differently. I frames are complete expressions of a picture with no temporal compression information.
    P frames use _P_redictive information. IE information from prior frames.
    B frames use _B_i-directional predictive frame information.
    h.264 gets the majority of it's bit saving from use of B and P frames. When you do I-frame only you only get the block compression and none of the advantages of P and B frames. Thus the GOP N=1 doesn't get very good bit's per pixel.
    Having said all that I do find your comment...
    Profitic wrote:
    Note how the data rate drops 70% (from 2.17 to 0.66 bpp) even though 50% of the I-frames still exist when N=2. By comparison, here is the video data rate when exporting with QuickTime H.264:
    ... very interesting. Indeed, why is the datarate 70% less when it should at best be 50% for GOP N=2. 50% less should be the same I-frame information plus 0 bytes for the B frame between them. (GOP = I,B,I). Any more than that and it is throwing away bits from the I-frame. So, this seems to be to be a ratecontrol bug.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_pictures
    "The GOP structure is often referred by two numbers, for example, M=3, N=12. The first number tells the distance between two anchor frames (I or P): it is the GOP size. The second one tells the distance between two full images (I-frames): it is the GOP length. For the example M=3, N=12, the GOP structure is IBBPBBPBBPBBI. Instead of the M parameter the maximal count of B-frames between two consecutive anchor frames can be used."

  • Airport Extreme Card Data Rate

    I've just bought a MacBook Pro which has an Airport Extreme card.....
    In order to achieve data rates of 54 Mbps do I have to use an Airport Extreme Base Station?
    Or can I still achieve 54 Mbps with a third party 802.11g wireless base station?

    You do not need an AEBS to achieve maximum throughput, any 802.11g compliant router will theoretically achieve that speed. Bear in mind that the theoretical speed is never reached in real-world applications. You will be lucky to get one-half that speed.

  • Another Data Rate Too High Error Question

    Hi all,
    I have seen quite a few posts about pgc errors, but most of them deal with slideshows and not video; and I can't find anything with the REF=KApgc error.
    I'm just putting all of my home movies onto an authored DVD, not rocket science.  I'm using the 'Film Submenu' preset with only 5 main movies, things like Easter, Birthday, etc.  My transition for each button is a slate (for lack of a better word) that says exactly what it is and when it happened, before each movie plays.
    After I had everything set up, I realized I didn't have an ability to "play all" that would include these slates.  Simple solution, make a 'play all' button that links to a timeline that has everything in it - the slate, then the movie, next slate, next movie and so on.  (When I say movie - they are all .mov files rendered out from After Effects, even the slates)
    My transcode settings are NTSC DV High Quality 7mb VBR 2 Pass and the "maximum quality" box is checked.
    When I run the 'Check Disc' all is fine.  Preview the disc, all is fine.
    Build Disc: Hours of Transcoding then the error: Data Rate Too High at *timecode* REF=KApgc.
    When this movie is by itself with a button click, it's fine.  It's only in the "play all" timeline that it produces the error.
    If the data rate isn't too high in one place, why is it too high in another?  It's the same thing, just a longer timeline.
    Please Help!
    Thanks.

    Thanks Jeff,
    I feel kind of silly for not thinking of that as a solution to my play all dilemma.  That's why you're the expert I guess.
    A better solution would be to create a playlist of all of your other timelines; that way, only one copy of each gets burned to disc.
    Hopefully the "data rate" error will go away with these changes.
    -Jeff
    Can I place my slates that are just assets (.mov) in the playlist or can I only put timelines in there?
    Thanks again,
    -Jim

  • Reducing data rate written to a LVM file

    I have a LabVIEW 7.1 question regarding data logging. I have designed a system that reads the pressure of 6 4-20Ma pressure transducers. This data is then filtered to remove any noise, and displayed to the user on the computer's screen.
    I am currently reading the data at 1000HZ using the DAQ Assistant, which seems to give a clear picture of the pressure changes. My supervisor has asked me to allow the system to log the results for what may be 3 or 4 days. As you ca imagine, 48 hours at 1000 samples a second is a lot of data! I need some method to reduce the data rate written to the file. Ideally, I would like to take one second of data, find the highest reading, and then file a single entry and a timestamp interval of 1 second. So, for each hour, there would be 3600 rows with 7 columns (1 time stamp and 6 sensors). It would be nice if the 1 second average could be adjustable, so that if long term logging is to be done (a week, for example), the interval can be changed to 5 seconds or whatever.
    I have tried reducing the data read rate as much as possible, but it seems that 100hz is the smallest that is possible. That is still too high... as the hard drive would fill up in no time.
    Any help in this area would be appreciated. I have tried a few things, and all to no success. I have included a copy of the code for anyone to review.
    Hardware:
    - 1 X P3 Laptop running LabVIEW 7.1 data acquisition software
    - 1 X NI DAQCard-6062E interface PCard
    - 1 X NI SC-2345 data acquisition hardware with
    - 3 X SCC-CI20 current input module
    - 6 X Omega PX 0-600PSIA 4-20mA pressure transducer
    thanks so much!
    Andrew
    Attachments:
    Testing.vi ‏812 KB

    You would have to talk with your supervisor first to determine what he intends to do with the log data and what degree of resolution he actually needs first. You probably want the 1000Hz Sampling rate so you can do decent filtering on the signal (hopefully your pressures aren't actually changing at a faster rate than that). I'm assuming you are returning a single result for those 1000 readings for each sensor. Specify some file logging duration of n-seconds (or minutes or whatever). Between file writes, pop each filtered measurement into an array (either 1 array of 6 dimensions or 6 1-dimension arrays). After n-seconds have passed, determine the min, avg, and max values from each sensor (array) and log those with your timestamp. So if you set your log timer for 1 minute, you would log a single min, max, and average reading of 60 readings for 6 sensors (this would only require 1 row with say a timestamp and 3x6 (18) columns for each sensor's min, max, average data). After a 24hour period you will have logged 1440 rows of data. In 3 days that would only be 4320 rows of data. All that is as easy as using a timer and a case structure around your logging function which would be triggered every n-seconds. Everything else you're doing would be the same. None of this really has much to do with labview as it is more of a logical explanation of how and when to acquire and log your data. What method are you using for storing your data? CSV, BIN, etc.. If you also want to display the data in a chart, I would recommend charting the same data you're logging, otherwise your chart will probably crash your system at 1000samps/second for 60 hours.. Once again, it depends on how your supervisor is analyzing the logged data. Make your log duration programmable and change it until he is happy. If he's(she's?) using Excel, your maximum log timer would be 9 seconds (Equates to ~6.67 Logs per Minute, ~400 Logs per Hour, ~9600 Logs Per Day, for a total of 28,800 Logs(rows) for 3 days -- Excel is limited to 32000 rows).

  • Transfer data rate

    OK, so I have resolved an older problem only to have dropped frames all the time during playback. How do I find out the maximum transfer data rate my processor can handle? ANy suggestions on how to get around an issue like that? If I want clean crisp graphics, how can I avoid the DV codec - which I understand is awful for graphics- yet still be able to play my sequence back without dropped frames?

    Hi Kristin,
    If I read correctly, you moved everything off your internal drive to an external. This external drive - is it a SATA drive, or FireWire? You mentioned SATA before, so I'm inclined to think that's what it is. If it IS an external Serial ATA drive, when you got it, did you zero all data on the drive before using it?
    Also, when you started using this new external, did you change your capture/render drive settings in your prefs in FCP? If not, they may still be set to your system drive, the default, instead of your new external hard drive. If this is the case, change it in FCP, save, and quit. TRASH the render files and move all the capture files from the system disk. re-open FCP, reconnect the moved capture files (if any), and of course, you'll have to re-render most of your timeline. when you do this, it'll render everything to the new hard drive (SATA, yes?), and you SHOULD be good to go.
    Now, as for interfacing with a monitor or an external device - are you going throgh firewire to a camera or deck and then to your video monitor? If so, no matter what, you won't be able to view anything but a single frame at a time with uncompressed. The only other thing that I can think of is that your camera/deck/external video device is powered on while you're trying to do this. In order to monitor Uncompressed externally, you need a pretty spiffy video capture card like the Kona. But internally, you should have no issues. So, make sure any external device except a hard drive is turned OFF, and disconnected.
    If none of this works, what you may want to do is change your sequence settings back to NTSC/DV for compression, and when you're totally done editing your project, you change them BACK to uncompressed, render, and export an uncompressed file to an external hard drive, take that drive to a video production company, have them slap it on a DigitalBeta tape as a master, and you're good to go.
    Hope this helps...
    -Kris

  • Another PGC Data Rate Error

    Hi,
    Like a few others out there, I've been having a "PGC Data rate too high, please switch with lower data rate" problem for a few weeks now. I've been searching online for the past week and a half for a solution and have tried everything suggested, from changing the transcoding max bitrates (down to 5.0) and lowering the audio bitrate, to recompressing, and reencoding the said video file that is having problems. I removed this certain video from my project and built it without any problems which leads me to believe that this one video is the culprit. No matter what I've tried, I still get the same message although the time of error varies by a second or two. Is there any other help someone may be able to offer about the subject? Thanks.
    Leighton

    Leighton.
    This sounds like a somewhat esoteric way to do the conversions IMHO.
    It is possible the total combined data rates do exceed - but in EncoreDVD 2 this is a warning more than anything else.
    I got these when running HIgh Bitrate MPEG-2 CBR encoded files along with PCM audio - I ignored the warning & built the disc anyway. It worked just fine.
    Bitrates in question were 8,000 for video & 1536 for Audio.
    Within specs. The little yellow triangle triangle with an exclamation mark was clearly visible in the timeline, so I used the "Ignore warnings & build anyway" option as I knew it was "in-spec".
    Can you please let us know some details about the project:
    1 - Source of files
    2 - Bitrates encoded
    3 - Audio type
    etc.
    I wonder - and hopefully someone can confirm one way or the other - if Encore sets the limit for this warning from the setting made in preferences about the maximum bitrate?

  • Airport Extreme Data Rate

    Hi All,
    I have a home setup consisting of 2x AirPort Extreme's (5th Gen) connected together via Cat5e. I was just having a browse in the airport utility and noticed my connection status on my extended AirPort Extreme was 'Good' with the data rate only at 100 Mb/s where the maximum was 1,000 Mb/s.
    Anyone have any idea's where the bottleneck is here? Or have I possibly misconfigured something?
    Thanks in advance.

    You are correct, from the Windows Airport Utility you cannot see this information, however from the iPad Airport Utility I can see the following information as shown below. To be this seem's that it is stating the line speed between my two AE's - Correct me if I am wrong....

  • Data rate when creating Quicktime h.264: difference between download and streaming ?

    I've got a question on data rate setting when creating a quicktime movie with h.264 codec:
    In the Compression settings dialog I can restrict the data rate to a certain value (e.g. in my case I use 20.000 kbit/s for creating a HD1080i movie).
    There is an additional drop box "Optimized for" where I can select between "download", "streaming" and some other value.
    Is anybody aware of the exact meaning of these settings ? My impression is, that using "download" I set the average bit-rate, allowing much higher bit-rates in peaks, while "streaming" sets a maximum bit-rate. Is that correct ? or are any other parameters affected by this setting ?
    I now discovered, that the output file when using "streaming" with restriction of 20.000 kbit/s leads to a file with average bitrate of only approx 17.000 kbit/s (while it's more or less exactly 20.000 when using the "download" setting). Does that mean, that the overall quality of my output file would be worse ? or would only peak rates be affected (e.g. scenes with a lot of movement) and the overall quality remains the same ?
    Happy to learn if anyone has any experiences / best practices on this topic.

    Restrict isn't, it seems, a hard limit. When I specify 18Mbps it seems to run up to 21Mbps. But, that's fine since it's certainly isn't excessive and if I really cared I could set it at 15Mbps.
    I suspect it might be more accurate with 2-pass. Also, i never ever use the Apple codec. i use x264 which allows more encoding tools. And, even it is not a super good H.264 encoder.
    Using rates under 2400Mbps is IMHO asking for the near impossible for good quality SD video.

  • How to select maximum date in report

    i have tried to select maximum date in my report by this way:
    select max(date) from a
    but the result came out same as "select date from a"
    there is no different whether i put a max or not. is anyone there can help me on this please....
    Thank you....

    Hi Sharon,
    Since you cannot execute this query from SQL, I assume that the DB does not support the function MAX(expr). Am not sure which DB versions support this function, probably the Database forum will be a better place to ask that.
    As a workaround, what you could try is to use this statement
    select hire_date from employees order by hire_date desc
    and in the report data model, you make a summary column and choose Function > First, Source > Hire_Date, and Reset At > Report.
    Hope that helps.
    Navneet.

Maybe you are looking for