Maximum number of dimensions & databases allowed & recommended in Essbase?

Hi,
can anyone one give input on what are Oracle recommendations on maximum number dimensions & databases allowed & recommended in Essbase?

Hi John,
Thanks for your post, I also have the same query related to Dimensions and Databases of (ASO,BSO) application, as i donot found anything like this in
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/esb_dbag/limits.htmlwhat is the maximum number of dimension & databases we can use in essbase application. like we have limitation of dimensions and database in Planning application
Thanks,
Avneet

Similar Messages

Is there any limitations to the maximum number of dimensions in MP?

hi all
Is there any limitations to the maximum number of dimensions can be created in Multi provider. If so how what is the maximum number of dimensions that can be created in a multi provider?
regds
haritha

Hi,
Maximum number of dimensions 16. Out of 16, 3 are system defined
1.Datapacket
2.Time
3.Unit
It is restricted to 16 because the maximum no of dimensions in any database is 16.
Reward points if helpful
Cheers
Raj

Maximum number of dimensions for an array

What is the maximum number of dimensions an array can accept:
a. 266
b. 255
c. 256
d. 250
which option is correct and why?

sabre150 wrote:
I don't know and I most definitely don't care since anything more than 2 is, in my opinion, just silly.It's also quite untractable from a memory standpoint. Say you have an 10 by 10 by 10 array. That's 10^3 elements. Now say you have 250 dimensions, that's 10^250 elements which is a huge number in the order of the number of atoms in the universe or so.
Say you instead have just 1 element in each dimension. Then you got a total of 1^250 elements, which is 1 element. That's okay but you don't need the array because 1 element is a variable. This means an array has at least 2 elements in each dimension. That's 2^250 elements which is like 10^75 which is also a huge number. You wouldn't get that kind of memory even if you added up all computers that ever existed.
So array dimensions in the order of 250 aren't just silly, there isn't enougth memory for them.

Maximum Number of Mirrored Databases Decreases as Number of Available Cores Increases?

Hi,
I wonder if you can help me. We're planning a large in-house mirroring deployment and are concerned we may (at some point) run into the limits described in the following KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2001270/en-gb.
Based on the formulas contained within the above article, I knocked up a quick spreadsheet to see how increasing the number of cores might allow us to increase the number of mirrored databases. However, to my surprise, my calculations imply that as you increase
the number of cores, the number of databases you can potentially mirror decreases?
No. of Logical Cores
Max Worker Threads
Threads Required per Mirrored Database
Max. No. of Databases that can be Mirrored
4
512
3
170.6666667
8
576
4
144
12
640
5
128
16
704
6
117.3333333
20
768
7
109.7142857
24
832
8
104
28
896
9
99.55555556
32
960
10
96
64
1472
18
81.77777778
Am I missing something here? Have a miscalculated somewhere? This seems counterintuitive.
Regards
Andy

Hi rushandy,
As the KB post, we need to calculate the max worker threads, which is default no. of worker thread SQL Server will spawn. about database mirroring requirements for worker threads, we need to calculate the number of threads required per mirrored database.
At end,
maximum number of databases that can be mirrored = the max worker threads/ the number of threads required per mirrored database.
As your post, for 64 bit architectures, if the number of logical CPU cores is 16 on the mirror server, after calculating , maximum number of databases that can be mirrored is 117. However, in actual scenario, the mirroring databases is less than 117, or
else, it will cause some errors, such as error 17884 and so on.
Usually, not all worker threads would be available to perform mirroring activities as some threads are assigned to core database activity on the server. For more information, see：http://sqlknowledgeshare.blogspot.com/2012/02/do-you-know-maximum-number-of-databases.html
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

What is the maximum number of A5 artboards allowed?

Hi,
Sorry if this is a simple question but I can't find the answer anywhere.
I'm trying to create an A5 brochure in Illustrator CS6 and ideally I would like it to be 104 pages, but the maximum number of artboards I'm allowed is 100. Yet, when I set my size to A5 and number of artboards to 100 it says "Cannot fit artboards in canvas size. Please change the artboard size or number of artboards and try again." Do you know how many I'm allowed at A5 size?
Alternatively, would you recommend doing, say, 4 lots of 26 artboards and getting the printers to stitch them together when printing?

100 artboards is max.
You'd better use InDesign.

Maximum number of hosts not allowed

Our account should allow 3 simultaneous hosts, but it is only allowing 2.
It says we have reached our maximum number of hosts.
When I check the admin of the account it reads as it should: 3 hosts.
Customer is waiting. Adobe nowhere to be found.
Anyone have this issue or a resolution?
Thanks,
Seth

Either call 800-422-3623 or try chating with Adobe Support here: Adobe Connect Help | Adobe Connect Support
Select Account Administration in the drop down and then click the I still need help button.
If you purchased from a Connect reseller, you can always contact them to get help as well.

What is the Maximum Number of Concurrent Sessions allowed on a Shared Exchange Mailbox ?

Hi,
I have a query that how many concurrent sessions are allowed on a Resource Mailbox ?
E.g. I have a scenario in which i run a Helpdesk, and it has an email address ([email protected]), where company employees can email thier IT Issues/requests.
Now I have hired say 50 Service Desk agents, now is it possible that all 50 can access the IThelpdesk mailbox at one time ? Are there any limits on the number of the concurrent sessions of the mailbox ? What are the the permutations and combinations in this
case ?
** The mailbox is on Exchange Server 2003**
Regards,
Tojo Thankachan
+91 7875039665

Hi,
Exchange Server 2003 SP1 imposes a restriction on the number of permitted MAPI sessions per user. By default, the maximum number of permitted MAPI sessions per user is set to a hexadecimal value of 0x20 after you apply Exchange Server 2003 SP1.
Generally, Event ID 9646 will be logged in the application event log of your Exchange Server 2003 computer when a client opens many MAPI sessions. Here is a KB descripted the details of it:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842022
For more information about MAPI session limit, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd159906(v=exchg.80).aspx
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Maximum number of dimensions

Hi! Sorry the stupid question, how many dimensions can you have in an Essbase cube? I have heard 21? Thanks

As many as you want. However when doing this you need to think about your user base, and how easy they will find it to understand. You also need to check the density or sparsityof your data, and see whether there is scope for condensing anything. You can also use Attribute dimensions (if you are on Essbase 6.5.6 or above - below they don't work 100% correctly) to analyse data in different ways.

What is the maximum number of email aliases allowed?

I just tried to set up 2 email aliases via iCloud.com. I already have one setup and wanted to add a further two, which should be allowed as it says I can setup 2 more at the bottom of the preferences pane. I did delete an alias that I no longer used about a month or so ago. I've created one new alias but when I go to create my second new one it flashes up with a message saying something about a waitng period? And that because I've just deleted an alias I've got to wait 7 days before I can setup a new one as I'm at my maximum?!
I'm not at my maximum, I've got 2 setup and it says I have one more to setup now but it won't let me do it. I don't know why it's giving me this waiting period because I cancelled one of my old aliases ages ago. Any ideas?

You are allowed three aliases. When you have three, and delete one, you have to wait 7 days before you can create another to replace it.
That's the theory. Several posters have complained that the 7 days has extended itself into several weeks, and I've not seen a solution as yet.

Maximum number of Attribute dimensions Possible in BSO Cube

hi,
i have two simple queries :
1 - What are the maximum number of Attribute dimensions Possible in a BSO Cube.
2- How many attribute dimension can be associated with one base Dimension.
hope to get reply soon.
thanks in advance.
Regards
Anubhav

No Limits are defined as such:
How many Maximum number of Dimensions can create ?
Even in the Dbag, it says "many":
A base dimension member can have many attributes, but only one attribute from each attribute dimension.Cheers..
Rahul S.

Increasing maximum number of Logical Processors in a Processor Group greater than the default (64)

Can the maximum number of Logical Processors allowed in a Processor Group be increased by Bcdedit command or registry key to a number greater than the default (64) to allow non-group-aware applications to seamlessly scale via multithreading across more cores
MSDN documents methods to reduce the max number of LP's in a Processor Group to 1 or any power of 2 less than 64 in order to increase the number of Processor Groups. But there is no discussion of how to increase the maximum number of Logical Processors
allowed in a Processor Group to a number greater than the default (64), e.g. to 128 or 256.
Since a non-group-aware application/process can only run on 1 Processor Group, increasing this limit is needed to allow non-group-aware multithreaded applications to scale seamlessly for parallel computation across more than 64 cores simultaneously on systems
with more than 64 cores (for example, a quad-socket Intel Xeon system with 24 cores per socket, including true and hyper cores). If that limit can be set via registry key or command line, or if there is another way to force all the cores on
all 4 sockets (4 NUMA nodes in this case) to join in 1 Processor Group, then non-group-aware applications will not need to be rewritten using group-aware thread-affinity APIs.

Hi John,
Are you trying to specify a static NUMA-node-to-group assignment, rather than letting Windows dynamically assign NUMA nodes to groups at boot time? If yes, You can refer the
following related KB:
How to manually configure K-Group assignment on multiprocessor machines
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2506384
Systems with fewer than 64 logical processors always have a single group, Group 0. On systems with 64 or fewer processors, existing applications will operate correctly without
modification. Applications that do not call any functions that use processor affinity masks or processor numbers will operate correctly on all systems, regardless of the number of processors. To operate correctly on systems with more than 64 logical processors,
the following kinds of applications might require modification:
•Applications that manage, maintain, or display per-processor information for the entire system must be modified to support more than 64 logical processors. An example of
such an application is Windows Task Manager, which displays the workload of each processor in the system.
•Applications for which performance is critical and that can scale efficiently beyond 64 logical processors must be modified to run on such systems. For example, database
applications might benefit from modifications.
•If an application uses a DLL that has per-processor data structures, and the DLL has not been modified to support more than 64 logical processors, all threads in the application
that call functions exported by the DLL must be assigned to the same group.
By design, a non-NUMA computer is considered to have one NUMA node. Because NUMA nodes cannot span groups, the system creates a node for each group after you restart the computer.
The related KB:
Processor Groups
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405503(v=vs.85).aspx
More information:
Uneven Windows Processor Groups
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/saponsqlserver/archive/2011/10/08/uneven-windows-processor-groups.aspx
Boot Parameters to Test Drivers for Multiple Processor Group Support
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff542298(v=vs.85).aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

ORA-20001: Maximum number of email messages per workspace exceeded

Greetings. We are running APEX 4.1.1. I have an application where we have to send out email messages to a list of emails. Currently there are 2469 email addresses. Originally we put the email addresses in the BCC but we received an error that we had exceeded the size limit of the BCC. So we modified our procedure to send one email at a time, in a loop.
Now we are receiving the following error message:
"ORA-20001: You have exceeded the maximum number of email messages per workspace"
Has anyone else run into this issue? What is maximum number or email messages per workspace? Is it a limit per day, per session?
We have not added emails to this table since last year, so the maximum number of email messages allowed may have changed recently?
I did find this Forum post that addressed the issue but no one responded:
How many mails i can send at a time per day using APEX mail system?
Thanks,
John

Hi jfosteroracle,
You are getting the error may be the following reason,
Check the following,
Login as ADMIN and Goto -->Manage Instance-->Instance Settings--> Mail-->Maximum Emails per workspace
Actually this number denotes the Number of mails can be sent per 24 hour for the workspace,It may exceeded.
It may be the reason.
Thank you.
Regards,
Gurujothi
Edited by: Gurujothi on Jun 27, 2012 5:54 AM

Is there a set maximum number of item s in the xml feed?

Is there a limit to the maximum number of <item>s allowed in the .xml feed for publishing on iTunes?
That is, does there come a point where old items have to be deleted before new ones can be added?
PC Windows XP

I would imagine most people submitting such a large number of jobs are using something more robust like Qube:
http://www.pipelinefx.com/products/qube-film.php
Qmaster is very buggy and would need a complete rewrite before it could be qualified for use in such an environment.

Number of standby databases in Oracle 11g

Hi ,
We could create maximum of 9 standby databases in Oracle 10g.
How many maximum number of standby databases can be created in Oracle 11g?
Regards
Barkhaa

You can search for the answer here: http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/homepage

Has a maximum number of item s been set in the .xml feed?

Is there a limit to the maximum number of <item>s allowed in the .xml feed for publishing on iTunes?
That is, does there come a point where old items have to be deleted before new ones can be added?

If there is it is fairly high. I just downloaded all of 7th Son Podcast last weekend, 50+ episodes.

Maximum number of dimensions & databases allowed & recommended in Essbase?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for