Maximum number of folders and maximum folder depth in KM

Hello,
I am interested to know if there is a limitation in the KM for folder creation or folder depth. Because I have read about a limitation of 1000 files in a folder.
Thanks
David Höller

Hi,
The maximum number of resources is 2,147,483,648
Refer this thread
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=445652&tstart=0
Regards,
Senthil K.

Similar Messages

XML rendering of folders and/or folder items

Hello,
Rummaging thru the Portal pkg. specs, I came across apis that generate an xml lsiting of folders (and their sub-folders) ,as well as folders and their items. Can we get a corresponding XSL and DTD as sample code ?

Hi,
The maximum number of resources is 2,147,483,648
Refer this thread
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=445652&tstart=0
Regards,
Senthil K.

Archive creates empty MAC OSX folders and second folder with documents...

I have been sending .zip documents to customers for some time. I archive using the ctrl + click method (choosing CREATE ARCHIVE...)
Customers have been saying that they can't find the files, that the folders are empty. I didn't know what they were talking about...until I archived a folder, transfered it to a LACIE external hard drive on the Ethernet network, decompressed it and saw what they were talking about! What is that MAC OSX folder? Why does CREATE ARCHIVE create 2 folders with the document in one of them? I frankly don't get it. The external drive we have is a LaCie Mini 250 MB formatted in ext 3 (Linux?) before it was formatted HFS+ but it created problems and the LaCie technicians suggested that we format the disk in Ext 3 (Ext 3, 13 35, I don't quite remember). The disk was originally formatted in Fat32 (Windows) which didn't work (filenames, unable to copy or delete, etc).
Is CREATE ARCHIVE the problem? or is it network disks which are PC disks or PC-originally-intended disks?

Hi, Louis. Welcome to the Discussions.
See my post here and the related comments concerning Create Archive in that topic. I believe that will help you understand what's happening.
Good luck!
Dr. Smoke
Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X

Maximum number of files in a folder ?

Hello, what is the maximum number of files in a folder OS X can handle ?
I used a file recovery software called FileSalvage to save some files of an external 300GB with a corrupted disk directory (unable to repair with the usual repair/recovery programs).
FileSalvage recovered about 435,000 files and sorted them by extension in individual folders, unfortunately it does not recognize the file names and just sequentially names the files per extension.
The .jpeg, .gif and .html folders had up to 75,000 files. After recovery the external FW drives started to behave very strange, unresponsive, just hanging, time-out. I tried on a Mac Mini, iMac G5, an iBook and PowerBook, OS X 10.3.9 and 10.4.3, FW400/800 and USB 2.0 interface, they all had pretty much the same failure mode after a while.
Running Disk Utility on the drives with the recovered FileSalvage folders showed a corrupted directory (invalid file count) and unable to repair, although I could copy most of the folders of the disk (deleted the folders with more than 10,000 files per folder).
I suspect that File Salvage copies more files in a folder than OS X allows, causing unpredicable problems.
Any ideas ?

From "Mac OS X: Mac OS Extended Format volume and file limits"
"Maximum number of files (or files and folders) in a folder … up to 2.1 billion"
According to a note in the document, the above is subject to the drive's size (maximum 16 terabytes in "Tiger") and block size, ie. the number of available blocks.
So it would appear that the number of files you mentioned would be well within theoretical limits, although I suppose there could be a bug in some other part of OS X. Otherwise, maybe there is a problem with the drive...

Maximum number of characteristics and Key figures used in a Query

Hi Experts,
Any Thought on the maximum number of Characterstics and key figures that can used in a Query. I know it impacts performance query and runs for very long time.
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi Kumar,
Welcome to SDN.
I really did not think about it till now, sharing my thoughts on this -
1. You can use all the characteristics & Key Figure ( & more)in Query what you have in you Cube.
2. Query is suppose to serve a purpose, to deliver you analytics based on some KPI etc & it will have maximum no of char / key figures which human mind could make some sense of.
3. Performance of query actually is divided into three areas -
a. database time
b. OLAP time
c. Front End time
and if you query on not performing well first look at which area is taking maximum time & the optimize that first & there are various ways to optimize each area.
Hope it helps.
VC

Turning on Render at Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality crashes render every time

I've tried a few times to render an H264 version of my Red media project with Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality. Premiere crashes every time. I have GPUs enabled. Are people using these settings with Red media and successfully rendering?

To answer your specific question did you see the tooltip?
I beleive it allows for 32-bit processing (16-bit if unchecked). Per the project settings help file at http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-elements/using/project-settings-presets.html
Maximum Bit Depth
Allows Premiere Elements to use up to 32‑bit processing, even if the project uses a lower bit depth. Selecting this option increases precision but decreases performance.
The help file for export is somewhat less informative about what it actually does but does point out that it is the color bit depth - http://helpx.adobe.com/media-encoder/using/encode-export-video-audio.html
(Optional) Select Use Maximum Render Quality or Render At Maximum Bit Depth. Note: Rendering at a higher color bit depth requires more RAM and slows rendering substantially.
In practice the simplest suggestion is to export twice - once with / once without the setting and compare the time taken and perceived quality.
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children
If this post or another user's post resolves the original issue, please mark the posts as correct and/or helpful accordingly. This helps other users with similar trouble get answers to their questions quicker. Thanks.

Wraptor DCP and missing Maximum Bit Depth option

DCPs are made from 12bit JPEG200 frame files wrapped is a MFX container. But there is no Maximum Bit Depth option in Wraptor DCP codec for AME8.
Does it means:
1. Wraptor DCP has by default Maximum Bit Depth checked on, so it correctly produces high depth color renders?
2. OR, Wraptor DCP ignores AME Maximum Bit Depth, so it always renders in 8 bits and than scale up to 12bits (what is a waste of information)?
The following article implies that option 2 is the correct case, what would be a shame for a such quality demand workflow as DCP production.
The Video Road – Understanding Color Processing: 8-bit, 10-bit, 32-bit, and more

Wraptor DCP output is not working for me on a feature length film. Am I missing something?
Symptom: simply hangs at various stages of the job. No message, never crashes... just STOPS on one frame and never resumes.
Hardware:
OSX 10.9.2 on MacPro late 2013
Going to try it with an older machine. Any suggestions?

Maximum number of folders in cabinet

I am wondering if WebAccess has a maximum number of folders in the cabinet that it will display. I have a user that has 1113 folders in his cabinet but WebAccess will only display the first 940 folders. Seems to me there is a limit in WebAccess but I don't know what it is. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

On 11/7/2011 6:06 AM, mplarocco wrote:
>
> I am wondering if WebAccess has a maximum number of folders in the
> cabinet that it will display. I have a user that has 1113 folders in his
> cabinet but WebAccess will only display the first 940 folders. Seems to
> me there is a limit in WebAccess but I don't know what it is. Any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
>
I am not aware of any formal limit, but could these be rearranged? I mean
1000+ folders at a single level isn't that usable anyway without more
grouping.

Maximum number of conditions and exceptions possible in a query

Hi Gurus,
I would like to know where it is possible to create more than a single exception or condition in a query. If it is possible, then are there any other implications that may result as far as data is concerned?
Also, is there a limit on the number of exceptions and conditions one can create in a single query?
Thanks
Deepthi

Dear Deepthi,
You can use exceptions to evaluate one or all key figures (structure elements) in your query definition. If you want to use exceptions selectively on specific key figures in your query definition, you have to define an exception for each key
figure accordingly.
On the Display tab of the exception definition you have control over which cells of an analysis receive the color for the determined alert level. If you select the checkbox for Exception Affects Data Cells, then the following choices can be made
Key Figure Choice Result
Evaluated Structure Element
The structure element chosen on the Definition tab will
be the one to receive the color assigned to the alert level.
All Structure Elements
Regardless of which structure element is being evaluated
in the exception, all structure elements will receive the
color assigned to the alert level.
Following Structure Element
With this setting, you can evaluate one structure element,
but then apply the color of the alert level to a different
structure element.
If the checkbox for Exception Affects Characteristic Cells is selected, then you can select from the following options:
Characteristic Cell Choice Result
Rows
The color of the alert level determined by the exception
is applied to the characteristic values in the row where
the exception occurs.
Columns
The color of the alert level determined by the exception
is applied to the characteristic value in the column where
the exception occurs.
Rows and Columns
The color of the alert level determined by the exception
is applied to the characteristic value in both the column
and row where the exception occurs.
Hope this information helps u...
Assign points if needful...
Best Regards,
VVenkat.

Maximum number of rows and columns in data form

Hi,
I wanted to know if there is a limitation to the number of rows and columns that can be displayed in a data form, in Hyperion planning 11.1.2.1 ?
And what would be the most appropriate number of rows and columns to be included for optimum performance.
Thanks.

Hi,
While its a fun fact to determine how much one can stuff into a web form, the reality is: how much can a user reasonably consume in a web form?
And what would be the most appropriate number of rows and columns to be included for optimum performance
You will find that the answer to this is by "what design makes a web form most usable?" And no, the users don't really know what they want from a design perspective, they see it in their head, but usually what they ask for is something that would look entirely different (huge).
The next thing to think about is the use of member selection functions in the page axis. IDescendants(Entity) in a dropdown could cause issues just as easily as too many rows - and again make the drop down unusable for a user.
If your question is a bit more technical, then consider this (somewhat oversimplified): Web forms are constructed by a process on the server. Objects are created based on the form's definition and used by the process that builds the form. The process uses Cartesian looping (lots of iterations) to construct the form cell by cell, starting at the top left and finishing up in the bottom right. If the form has a million cells on it, then the loop and all the code within it runs a million times. The capability of the server has a lot to do with how well it can handle this request, and how many it can handle at one time.
The result of this is gobs of HTML and JavaScript. All of this has to be sent over a network to the requesting client. The client starts receiving the web page code and has to render it in the browser and run the JavaScript. The ability to do this is limited by the browser, the OS, and the hardware that the client is running on.
And that's just rendering the page for use.
Now it has to be interacted with on the client machine, and changes parsed, packaged, and sent back to the server.
So the technical answer is, there can be many limitations to how many rows and columns a data form can have - none of which can truly be anticipated by anyone. This is why I put the part about usability first in this post.
Regards,
Robb Salzmann

Maximum folder size in 10.5.2?

What is the maximum folder size now in 10.5.2?
For around 10 years I've been using numerous partitions to organize my files and for easy backup, but I know that quite a while ago (years) the maximum folder size was dramatically increased (2GB > ?).
Has anyone had problems with these larger folders?
My files are extremely important (clients' files) so safety and stability are more important to me than anything else (i.e. the simplicity of fewer partitions perhaps).
Of course I could simply do a search for specs regarding this on Apple's website, but it would not indicate as to just how stable such huge folders have been for everyone.
Thanks for any info on this.

I went to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HierarchicalFileSystem
And I did carefully read the Apple white paper but still no where do I see a maximum folder size for within a volume
So I can only assume there is no maximum... that is... that you can actually have literally all of your files and folders in a volume within one folder even if it takes up 90% of the volume's/partition's space.
I originally posted this because rather than reformatting a couple of my hard drives... I was considering moving a couple of the partitions contents (each with around 40 GB of important files) to a larger partition and place each partition's contents in to individual folders. In-other-words... moving two 40 GB partitions to two separate folders within another 100 GB + partition. Thereby freeing up two 40 GB partitions without having to reformat my drives.
Anyone see a problem with that?

Is it possible for a mac to run across a Windows based server such as in a school, and still be able to access all networked folders? I have been told that macs can only read down a certain number of folders

Is it possible to run a mac on a windows based server? We have a server based on Windows 7 in our school, and our techies are reluctant to let me buy a mac as they say macs can only read a number of folders deep, which would preclude me from accessing shared folders on our servers. Is this true, and is there a way round this? I would eventually like to get a suite of macs, but because all our resources are on the server, I have to be able to access them.
Thanks for any help,
Mike

I have found that both Linux and Mac (unix) are capable of reading "deep" folders while win 32 will have issues, your it people are clearly wrong. I run a network with both win/mac. And as long as the win servers/pc's that have shares are set to allow apple file sharing in their folder properties. And the macs are set to allow smb there should absolutely no trouble with you accessing anything across the platforms, heck, from a Mac to a win pc on some occasions you don't even need to include a "domain" name to log on to, and you can create aliases and make your own shortcuts etc... So you don't have to manually connect each time you boot up etc... But that's all personal preferences I suppose.
All I can tell you is that, I do it on a daily basis managing a small business. So your answer is yes you can.

How can I control the order of accounts and folders in the folder pane?

I have many email accounts, and most of them share the same message store in Local Folders and I routinely download mail from all of this group. Additionally, I have a number of miscellaneous email accounts from which I do not regularly download email, so I have kept them showing as distinct accounts. However, since they are not important, I would rather that they come at the end of the list in the folder pane, as it does not matter much if they scroll off the bottom. Nevertheless, the folders for these accounts seem to insist on appearing before those for Local Accounts. I'd like to change that.
The explicit folders that I have created under Local Folders seem to insist on appearing in alphabetic order. Is there any way to override that?

Perfect! Thanks. It does exactly what I wanted and more.
Odd that it failed to turn up as a result of the search based on my initial question. My query had all the right words to get a hit. Hmmm ...
Now I am embarrassed. I just googled "thunderbird" followed by an exact quote of the question that is the subject of this thread, and guess what turned up at the top of the list! It should have occurred to me to try Google before I tried the question here. I guess I just never expected that there would be such a clean solution. Perhaps with my question now in the Mozilla database, others can benefit if they ask a similar question here.

Maximum Bit Depth /Maximum Render Quality Questions

Maximum Bit Depth
If my project contains high-bit-depth assets generated by high-definition camcorders, I was told to select Maximum Bit Depth because Adobe Premiere Pro uses all the color information in these assets when processing effects or generating preview files. I'm capturing HDV using the Matrox RTX-2 Hardware in Matrox AVI format.
When I finally export my project using Adobe Media Encoder CS4, will selecting Maximum Bit Depth provide better color resolution once I post to Blu-ray format?
Maximum Render Quality
I was told that by using Maximum Render Quality, I maintain sharp detail when scaling from large formats to smaller formats, or from high-definition to standard-definition formats as well as maximizes the quality of motion in rendered clips and sequences. It also renders moving assets more sharply. It's my understanding that at maximum quality, rendering takes more time, and uses more RAM than at the default normal quality. I'm running Vista 64 Bit with 8 GIGs of RAM so I'm hoping to take advantage of this feature.
Will this also help to improve better resolution when I finally export my project using Adobe Media Encoder CS4 and post to Blu-ray format?
Does it look like I have the specs to handle Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality when creating a new HDV project with the support of the Matrox RTX 2 Hardware capturing in Matrox AVI format? See Below Specs.
System Specs
Case: Coolmaster-830
Op System: Vista Ultima 64 Bit
Edit Suite: Adobe Creative Suite 4 Production Premium Line Upgrade
Adobe Premiere Pro CS 4.0.1 update before installing RT.X2 Card and 4.0 tools
Performed updates on all Adobe Production Premium Products as of 03/01/2009
Matrox RTX2 4.0 Tools
Main Display: Dell 3007 30"
DVI Monitor: Dell 2408WFP 24"
MB: ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi-AP LGA 775 Intel X38
Display Card: SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 4870 512MB GDDR5 Toxic ver.
PS: Corsair|CMPSU-1000HX 1000W
CPU: INTEL Quad Core Q9650 3G
MEM: 2Gx4|Corsair TW3X4G1333C9DHXR DDR3 (8 Gigs Total)
1 Sys Drive: Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB 7200 RPM 32MB
Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s
2 Raid 0: Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Using Intel's integrared Raid Controller on MB

Just some details that i find useful on maximum render depth
You really need it even with 8bit source files, when using heavy grading/multiple curves/vignettes. If after grading you see banding, go to sequence > sequence settings from the top menu and check "maximum bit depth (ignore the performance popup), then check again your preview (it will change in a second) to see if banding is still present in 32bit mode. If no banding, you must check it when exporting, if banding is still there, change your grading, then uncheck it to continue with editing.
Unfortunately Maximum bit depth exporting is extremely time-consuming, but can really SAVE YOUR DAY when facing artifacts after heavy grading, by completely or almost completely eliminating banding and other unwanted color distortions.
Use it only for either small previews or the really final output.
Best Regards.

Maximum bit depth-maximum render quality when dynamic linking

Hi
A bit confused by the use of Maximum bit depth and Maximum render quality as used both in Sequence Settings and also as options when rendering in AME.
1 Do you need to explicitly enable these switches in the sequence for best quality or, do you simply need to switch them on in AME when you render in Media Encoder?
2 When dynamic linking to After Effects, when should you use an 8 bit vs 16 or 32 bit working space, and, how does this bit depth interact with the maximum bit depth, maximum render quality in PPro?

Hi jbach2,
I understand your confusion. I'm like that most of the time I'm working. *chuckle* The two settings you mentioned are two completely different parameters affecting (or is it effecting) your video. You do not need to enable them within the sequence itself unless you want to preview video on you program monitor at the highest quality. I personally don't recommend it, as it's a tremendous resource hog, (the program even warns you when you try to click them) and unessecary for improving final output. Again, do not enable these options in your sequence settings if you are only wanting a high quality export. Doing so will greatly reduce your editing performance unless you have a high-end system. ...and even then I don't think its worth it unless you're editing on a huge screen with a Director who wants to see everything at a maximum quality during the edit process.
Keeping it simple...
Resizing your final output video? Use Maximum bit depth.
Starting or working with high bitdepth sources? Use Max Bit Depth.
When/where do I enable these? In the AME only. ^_^
Why?:
Enabling the Max bit and Max render only needs to be done when you are exporting. They both serve different functions.
Max Render aids in the scaling/conversion process only. My understanding is that you never need to enable the Max Render Quality (MRQ) unless you are exporting in a format/pixel ratio different from your original video. For example, when rendering a 1080p timeline out to a 480p file format, you'll want to use MRQ to ensure the best scaling with the least amount of artifacts and aliasing. If you're exporting at the same size you're working with, DON'T enable MRQ. It will just cost you time and CPU. Its only function is to do a high quality resizing of your work.
Maximum bit depth increases the color depth that your video is working with and rendering to. If you're working with video that has low color depth, then I don't believe it will matter. However, if you're working with 32 bit color on your timeline in PPro and/or After Effects, using lots of graphics, high contrast values, or color gradients, you may want to enable this option. It ultimately depends on the color depth of your source material.
The same applies to After Effects.
Create something in AE like a nice color gradient. Now switch the same project between 8,16,32 bit depth, and you will see a noticable difference in how the bit depth effects your colors and the smoothness of the gradient.
Bit depth effects how different plugins/effects change your overall image. Higher depth means more colors to work with (and incidentally, more cpu you need)
Just remember that "DEPTH" determines how many colors you can "fill your bucket with" and "QUALITY" is just that, the quality of your "resize".
http://blogs.adobe.com/VideoRoad/2010/06/understanding_color_processing.html
Check out this adobe blog for more info on color depth ^_^ Hope that helps!
----a lil excerpt from the blog i linked to above---
Now, 8-bit, 10-bit, and 12-bit color are the industry standards for recording color in a device. The vast majority of cameras use 8-bits for color. If your camera doesn’t mention the color bit depth, it’s using 8-bits per channel. Higher-end cameras use 10-bit, and they make a big deal about using “10-bit precision” in their literature. Only a select few cameras use 12-bits, like the digital cinema camera, the RED ONE.
Software like After Effects and Premiere Pro processes color images using color precision of 8-bits, 16-bits, and a special color bit depth called 32-bit floating point. You’ve probably seen these color modes in After Effects, and you’ve seen the new “32″ icons on some of the effects in Premiere Pro CS5.
jbach2 wrote:
Hi
A bit confused by the use of Maximum bit depth and Maximum render quality as used both in Sequence Settings and also as options when rendering in AME.
1 Do you need to explicitly enable these switches in the sequence for best quality or, do you simply need to switch them on in AME when you render in Media Encoder?
2 When dynamic linking to After Effects, when should you use an 8 bit vs 16 or 32 bit working space, and, how does this bit depth interact with the maximum bit depth, maximum render quality in PPro?
Message was edited by: SnJK

Maximum number of folders and maximum folder depth in KM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for