MB1B or ME2O for issuing components to Sub Con Vendor

Hi friends,
I am configuring Subcontracting process.
I have one doubt..
In the process, after creating PO --> which method we generally adopt while issuing components to Subcon Vendor (Global Practice)
Mvt Type 541 in MB1B OR ME2O ???
What is the merit of these two methods??
Could you please throw some light on it...
Regards,
Jackie

Hi Experts,
Thanks for your prompt reply & clarifying my doubt.
I am able to create Subcon PO & issue components to vendor, Receive FG from Subcon Vendor & then settle Invoice for Assembly charges.
But i am unable to issue componenst using ME2O.
My shipping point is not picked up automatically.
I followed all the config steps mentioned in this forum.
Do we have to issue components using Delivery in ME2O?
Regards,
Jackie

Similar Messages

Components of Sub Con PO : BAPI_PO_CREATE1

Hi All,
      I am trying to create a sub con purchanse Order using BAPI_PO_CREATE1. The problem that I am facing is that when dont pass the components (POCOMPONENTS) it picks up components form the BOM of material/plant combination. However I want to pass certain other components which are not there in the BOM. When I pass the components it creats the PO but without the components. I am using the following data structure for creating the components. I am also passing the POCOMPONENTSX table as written in the code below. Please help.
               lx_comp-item_no = l_rspos.
               lx_comp-po_item = c_10.
               lx_comp-material = lx_resb-matnr.
               lx_comp-entry_quantity = lx_resb-erfmg.
               lx_comp-entry_uom = lx_resb-erfme.
               lx_comp-plant = lx_resb-werks.
               lx_comp-plant = '1001'.
               lx_comp-change_id = 'I'.
               lx_compx-item_no = l_rspos.
               lx_compx-item_nox = 'X'.
               lx_compx-po_item = c_10.
               lx_compx-po_itemx = 'X'.
               lx_compx-material = 'X'.
               lx_compx-entry_quantity = 'X'.
               lx_compx-entry_uom = 'X'.
               lx_compx-plant = 'X'.
               lx_compx-change_id = 'X'.
               APPEND lx_comp TO li_comp.
               APPEND lx_compx TO li_compx.

can any one help ? Please !

Standard report for issued components

Dear Experts,
In my master recipe i am using a component which is also produced through the process as a co-product, the component appears in equal quantities, once with a positive and then with negative sign (for the co-product). But the problem is in consumption reports like MCRE the 2 quantities cancel out each other giving consumption of the component as zero. I want the system to consider only the positive quantity issued through 261 movement and not consider the negative quantity which is actually received during GR. The issued batch and the received batches are different.
Is this standard SAP behaviour or shall i need to change any master data or any configuration to get the right report? Please suggest.
Regards
Sunit.

Go to COOIS
select the list documented Goods movement and execute based on your selection criteria
In that report select the 261 and 262 movement only add the required field and save the layout as raw material consumption
and set the layout as default
when ever you see the documented goods movement in coois
System will display only 261& 262 movement only

Issue with Sub-Con PO (543 O movement)

Hi All,
I find that system is not posting 543 O movement for individual components when i do a GR for sub-con PO Material. I am following the steps below.
1. GI of components to Sub-Con PO thru' ME2o (System records a 541 movement for the components).
2. GR of Sub-Con PO thru' MB01 (101 mvt.) But the system does not post a 543 O movement for the components.
3. Also in ME2o when i check for these components, i notice the output still shows these components, although the stock is '0'.
Await inputs.
Vivek

Hi All,
Sorry for the late response. But after a detailed study, i notice this error is because, the user has actually transfered items which have bulk material indicator using MB1B by mistake, so when a GR for the material is done, system is not considering these bulk materials & hence no 543 O is posted.
Also these stocks are shown as lying with the vendor.
Now the dilemma is how to ensure these items are actually transferred to the respective finished assy & ensure that the costing of the assy is revised. If it is not possible, can i just post a 542 & reverse back these postings, will it have any financial impact? In terms of costing of the finished assembly which we received from sub-contractor will it have any impact?
Also would like to know any standard tx which displays stock @ sub-contractor by PO or any user-exits available for this?
Anyone to help on this?
Edited by: Vivek on May 7, 2008 3:02 PM

Sub-Con Procurement process

Hi Experts,
We have sub-con process. we will send 'COMPONENT1' of 100 quanity to sub-con vendor and he will send 60- 80 qunaitys of FG1 & 40 to 20 quanitys of FG2 to us but unfortunately we will not know in-advance exact quntitys of FG1 & FG2. Now, if we receive FG1 different price and FG2 have different price. So our PO price does not match with Invoice price. Please explain in detials how to model this secnario.
Thanks,
Naveen

Hi Naveen,
Without manual intervention it is not possible as you are not knowing in advance about the delivery note quantity of FG1 and FG2 from your subcontracting vendor.
1. You can create a Subcontracing PO with two line items as FG1 ( 80 qty ) and FG2 ( 20 qty ).
2. Post a goods issue with 541 for the supply of COMPONENT1 ( 100 nos )
3. Before Goods Receipt ( When the physical DN is received ) you can ammend the PO with the correct quantity of FG1 and FG2.
4. Then finally you can post your MIGO so that the cost of FG1 and FG2 service charges can be payable to your vendor without discrepancies.
Thanks and Regards,

Sub con p.o

Dear all,
I have ereated sub con p.o here i am sending a material for sub con vendor -1029 for (Wire cut) machining purposes while sending ior issuing the material as kgs or nos .while recieving also same kgs or nos .But my question is ,they are charging for machining as Hourly basis .For this how to map in sap while making MIRO or invoice .What steps i would have to follow .Kindly explain me in detail & revert it back.
Thanks
visu

Hi,
I hope the problem is, when you create PO, you don't know the exact service charge to the vendor.Only after the completion of service you know the exact charge.
In this case, you can create a PO with approximate price, then during GR you can change the price or during invocie verification, the exact price can be entered.
Regards,
Prabu

Display Components for issuing

Dear All,
How to display issuing components for which planned quantities has been fully issued:
System throws an alert message as : "Cannot display components for issuing; planned quantities have been fully issued"

Thanks for your reply..
but the scenario is
whether i can do any number of issue of production if planned qty and issued qty are equal for the same production order.
If i trying to do such scenario system throws an alert message as "Cannot display components for issuing;planned qty have been fully issued"
Please do the needful

Issue components for a subcontracting scheduling agreement

Hello,
Please can anyone tell me how (steps) to issue components on subcontracted item on a scheduling agreement . Item is also set up with KANBAN indicator so GR is done thru changing KANBAN bin status.
Thanks
Mira

You can view, Explode during creeation of delivery schedule for SA. Use ME38 transaction you will see the BOM in item details

Sub : Report generation for issue for production_Using sql

Dear members,
I am generating a report for issue for the production.In that i want to retrieve planned,completed quantity and availiable using sql query for a period of one year.Anyone pls help me in this regard to retrieve the above described fields.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Venkatesh.R

Venkatesh,
You can find a list of the tables used in the Business One database in the SAP Business One SDK Help Center Documentation under "Customization Tools".
Eddy

MB26 ,CO27 - goods issue components with serial number?

Hi ,everyone!
I know CO27 and MB26 can do goods issue to production order very easily and quickly!
But It seems CO27 and MB26 can not work well with the component with serial number.
I aslo know MB1A and MB1B can post goods issue for component with serial number.But in MB1A and MB11 , it is very difficult to can material by material number quickly while doing more then 100 components issue to one production order.
And for authorization purpose we restrict MIGO not to use goods issue for production order.
So I want to ask how CO27 and MB26 do goods issue for the component with serial number?
Or there is another ways to goods issue component with serial number to production order easily,exclude MB1A,MB11 and MIGO?
Thanks for any reply!

Hi Vivek
We use CO27 for goods issue to production order ,just like MB1A goods issue to production order.
But in the BOM components of the production orders ,some semi finished products are with with serial numbers ,so we can not use CO27 or MB26 to issue these components with serial numbers to production orders!

GR of subcontracting items without issuing components

Hi all
I am facing a problem regarding subcontracting. In a PO of material X (item category L (subcontracting)) of required quantity 10, a component Y quantity 50 to make X is to be given to the vendor. The problem I am facing is that I am able to post GR of all material X without issuing any Y to the vendor. I should not be able to do this until all the component quantity (50) has been issued to the vendor. If I issue 5 Y then I should only be able to receive 1 X at max or not even 1 X. When I issue some quantity of Y it stays in subcontracting stock as seen by transaction ME2O.
How to settle this stock with subcontractor and what should be done to not be able to MIGO all 10 X until 50 Y has been issued to vendor or or to be able to do it proportionally ?
Also fine tune my concepts in this regard.
Thnx

Yes receiving is a physical activity not a computer activity but what I want to say is that even if X is physically received, the user should not be able to MIGO it if the components issued (subcontractor stock) is not settled. When I MIGO the received items and enter 0 quantity for the issued component the system lets it be. Instead the system should issue an error implying that all components have not been issued to vendor, so you can not receive X until you have issued all Y.
Try to understand my point. I know physically the vendor will send the product only when he has received all components from us but on the system, I am able to receive all X without even issuing a single Y. This is important for me because if some receiver does this without settling the subcontractor stock, it will become an odd case because the movement type 543 which does this component settling is not selectable. It is automatic for subcontracting component line item. Kindly test this scenario on your system. Make a subcontracting PO, do not issue a single component to vendor and then MIGO this PO it with 0 component quantity. I am able to post the GR which i should not be able to because the shipper has not issued a component and the receiver is able to receive on the system. I just want the system to not receive until all the components have been shipped.

[svn:fx-trunk] 5170: Round 2 of bug fixes for the Spark skins for Halo components.

Revision: 5170
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-04 17:50:32 -0800 (Wed, 04 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Round 2 of bug fixes for the Spark skins for Halo components. Thanks to Alex for help with the data grid issues.
Bugs fixed:
SDK-19655 - Setting rowCount property on DataGrid causes extra blank row to be displayed
SDK-19652 - Items in a DataGrid do not line up after scrolling.
SDK-19605 - disabled Halo ColorPicker with Gumbo skin draws too dark
SDK-19596 - When you have a single button on an Alert, the left edge looks flatter than the right
SDK-19585 - Menus compiled with the halo theme in Flex 4 have a different backgroundColor than in Flex 3
SDK-19665 - Halo List with Gumbo skin doesnt draw the alternating item color all the way to the right edge of the control if VScrollBar is present
SDK-19651 - odd header rendering issue on Halo DataGrid with Gumbo skin
QA Notes: The alert layout code was positioning the buttons/text on sub-pixel boundaries if the width or height of the alert was an odd number of pixels. We always snap to pixel boundaries now, but this may cause bitmap compare issues with Alert.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19655
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19652
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19605
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19596
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19585
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19665
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-19651
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/alertClasses/AlertForm.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/ScrollControlBase.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/halo/defaults.css
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/sparkskins/src/mx/skins/spark/ColorPickerSkin.mxml

Report for Issued component Quantity vs Subcontracting PO component qntity

Dear Expert,
My client wants to know a report on issued Component quantity (what is issued against a Sub- contraction PO) with PO component quantity (what is maintained in a subcontracting PO component).
Is there any standard report available for the same?
Please suggest if any query report can be built or not.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Rajib Debnath

Do you change child qty consumption in p.o BOM ?
Check it in mb51 541 mvmt for material for issued component quantity.
Also check reports MBLB,ME2O.
Can you explain term
Report for Issued component Quantity vs Subcontracting PO component qntity

PGI for both main and sub items (Sales BOM)

Hello SD friends,
I'm trying to map some BOM scenario.
Only main item should be relevant for princing.
Here's what I've done :
1. Create sales BOM via CS01
2. Maintain item category group ERLA for main item and NORM for sub item MM01
3. Maintain item category TAQ for main item and TAE for sub item VOV4
When I wanna do PGI, system creates material document only for main item.
Which means that PGI has not been done for sub items.
Is there any way to make PGI possible for both main and sub items ??
Regards,
Bahia.

Can you clear, that why you want to issue both Main item/Sub Item, where your pricing is @ main item level.
in Main item level Pricing, Main item itself includes components. Once you issue the main item. from Inventory this main item wil be reduced.
Eg: In Case of Main Item- Computer (Assume Components - Monitor , Keyboard , CPU & Mouse)
Price for Computer - $1200. Component prices individually- $300 , $100, $700, $100 - These prices applicable only when you sell as BOM at Subitem level Pricing Or Seperately )-
In SO: - Order Computer (System explodes Components to verify,which are the subitems consists in Main Item)
DEL:- Components will be copied in Delivery , but not for dispatch (Sch Line Cat:CT has these controls)
Inv: Only Main item will be displayed for print.
NOTE: for your requirement, you can change the Schline Category from CT - CN- which is relevant for delivery with movement type i601 -in SO. Then you can dispatch components & these components will not copied into Invoice ,as they are not relevant for billing.
If you want CN has to determined automatically, maintain Schline Category determination accordingly.
Hope it helps,
Any info, please revert

Mvt 541 with MB1B and ME2O.

Hi,
I don't understand the difference between the above 2 trxs MB1B and ME2O and why
in ME2O there are two buttons ("Post goods issues" and "Create delivery").
Best regards

Hi,
MB1B transaction code is mainly intended for transfer postings from one storage location to another.
ME20 specially designed to process a subcontracing goods issue.
In MB1B we have to input the mvt type as 541 to supply a goods to a subcontracing vendor whereas in a ME2O transaction, system defaults the movement type as 541 which easens the task of remebering the mvt type while doing a subcontracing goods issue.
Post goods issue - Directly transfers the stock to Material provided to vendor.
Whereas Delivery option can be used if you want to process the material issue through a delivery process ie thorugh SD route. In short, PGI will be used when it follows MM route, whereas delivery option will be used when it is to be processed through the SD route.
Regards,
RitiG

MB1B or ME2O for issuing components to Sub Con Vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for