MB5S - GR Value

Hello,
Transaction MB5S is displaying a GR value that does not match the drill down list nor the PO history detail. The EKBE table matches the PO history and drill down list as well. Could someone advise if the calculation of the GR Value in the initial screen of MB5S considers additional parameters or if this should indeed match the total from the drill down list?
I am looking to understand how the GR value column in MB5S is populated and what parameters other than the GR entries in table EKBE may be included in that total.
Is there any scenario in which the GR value total in MB5S should differ from the total on the drill down list or the EKBE total
for GR documents?

thanks Jürgen for the reply:
This is the link where you can find the screenshot of the issue:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=6e193bcd87bfe19e&resid=6E193BCD87BFE19E!1002
please let me know if you need additional info
Thank you!!

Similar Messages

MB5S and MR11 not showing same Gr/IR differences data

Hi Gurus,
one PO XXXXXX was created with 100 EA . GR and IR was posted with amount 1597.87 TRY
Delivery cost Goods Receipts were posted (as per condition types maintained)
224.30
335.55
30.29
65.41
655.55 TRY
Delivery cost invoice was posted for 594.36 TRY and Subsequent debit was posted for 30.30 TRY
One MR11 Accounting document was posted for against 100 EAdelivery cost quantity.
The Po is now in closed status (DCI ticked)
I run MB5S report against this PO, the report is showing the diffrences that 65.41TRY delivery cost was received (GR) against one vendor and delivery cost Invoice was posted against other vendor
PO          --- line item --- Fright.Vendor - Received Qty - Qty Invoiced - GR value - Invoice amount- Currency
XXXXXX --- 10         ---   ABC              ---   0                    -
    100            -
0             -
65.41               --- TRY
XXXXXX --- 10         ---   EFG              -
100                  -
0                 -
65.41     -
0                     --- TRY
Due to MB5S report is showing the differences, I tried to run MR11 Transaction against this PO but system is showing " No data selected"
Request Gurus, please clarify me.. why MB5S report is showing differneces and why MR11 transaction is not showing any differences against the same PO
Regards,
Subbu

Hi Subbu,
MR11 report does not take into account the purchasing document items if they are blocked.
This issue may affect you.
Regards,
karry

MB5S & ZMB5S - GR/IR Balances

MB5L - Report can be run for current period, previous period and previosu year to enable reconciliation with GL for Inventory.
Seeking a similar report for MB5S or ZMB5S to run for GR/IR balance sheet GL account for previous month, year etc.
Thoughts please, iniitially MB5L was unknown to us but since haveing this T code Stock reconciliation is fine.
Now looking to have ZMB5S or equivalent so can run a report which agrees to GL for prior month.
We do not want to lock users out, if we locked users out there would not specifically be a requirement for MB5L as we could run MB5L & ZMB5S at the time all are locked out.
Given we have a number of sites etc with a variety of trsnactions taking palce would prefer not to lock users out.
Any sugestionbs.
Currently ZMB5S is reconciled during month say after hours mid month. At month end as processing receipts / issues are not finalised till midday of 2nd day of new period difficult to run a ZMB5S report to balance to GL and obtain accuracy without locking out all users. Currently users are posting in Day 1 till midday of Day 2 of new period a variety of transactions some will relate to new period and some to prior period as finalising receipts for month end close etc.
Kind Regards
John

Hi,
GR/IR Clearing account is an Interim account where the Invoice value is stored but we have not actually receive the Invoice. This is a balance sheet( Liabilities) account.We can do it as month end process (Subject to management Decision) else we can directly do at the year end. Before maintaining GR/IR account you need to ensure that there wont be any invoices from the vendor. After ensuring that difference value is maintained manually.
If the material is Std price, then the diff value will be debited in the price difference account.
If the material is on MAP, then it will be debited in the stock account to the extent where you have enough stock coverage, the remaining less value will be debited to the price difference account.
The balance in GR/IR accounts is due to:
1. GR is complete and yet to receive Invoice (IV is due).
2. Difference in GR and IV amount.
MR11 GR/IR clearing account ,
MR11SHOW Cancel/Display account maintaince in MM &
F.19 is used to for GR/IR clearing in FI.
Hope helpful.
Regards,
Biju K

GR/IR difference visible in MB5S but not clearing via MR11

Dear gurus,
I am facing abnormal behaviour of the system. System is showing few POs in MB5s but not showing it in MR11 for clearing purposes. Has anyone faced the same situation ?
Regards,
FR

Transaction MB5S is used to analyse the purchase order history and will list all entries where the goods receipts quantity is not equal to the invoice receipts quantity. The report looks at the purchase order
from a logistics viewpoint.
What MB5S does is to look in table EKBE where the PO history is
stored.If there is any balance between the GR/IR , this is shown
in the report. Sometimes there is confusion in the interpertation of the results of
RM07MSAL. The aim of this program is to show how the GR is effectively valuated
if the existing invoices are taken into account, independently from how the GR itself was valuated (or not valuated).
MB5S is not the appropriate functionality for analysis of the clearing account.
Transaction MR11 will only pick up variances in quantity, not in values.
The aim of MR11 is to clear the GR/IR account, not the quantities.
However, an open item on the GR/IR account can only exist, if the
quantities are different (for normal POs with valuated GR).
MR11 posts like an debit/credit note with value 0 and the open quantity.
This clears the GR/IR account, and the quantities are cleared as well,
but only as a by-product of this mechanism.
POs with non valuated GR never have open items on GR/IR account,
because neither GR nor IR post to the GR/IR account.
For additional information about the MR11 transaction please check
the SAP note 10757 FAQ: MR11, clear GR/IR clearing account.

MB5S.

Hi,
when executing trx MB5S, system shows that:
-received quantity = 67;
-quantity invoiced = 67;
-GR value =2242,8;
-Invoice amount 2242,8
Clicking on GR value (2242,8) shows that the column Amt.in loc.cur. for the GR is = 2194,92
that is (32,76 (price)*67 (quantity)).
Why the amount of this column is 2242,8 instead of 2194,92 (the value of the good receipt
(32,76 (price)*67 (quantity)) ?
It sounds really strange
Best regards

Hello,
in order to make it clear:
1. In MB5S you see 2242,8 in 'GR value' column
2. Clicking on this number, 2242,8, (still in MB5S) you can see 2194,92 (as total)
3. Checking the relevant item in the relevant PO you also see 2194,92 (as sum of all GR)
Please confirm.
Thanks,
Csaba

MR11 is differing with MB5S report

Hi Gurus,
one PO XXXXXX was created with 100 EA . GR and IR was posted with amount 1597.87 TRY
Delivery cost Goods Receipts were posted (as per condition types maintained)
224.30
335.55
30.29
65.41
Total 655.55 TRY
Delivery cost invoice was posted for 594.36 TRY and Subsequent debit was posted for 30.30 TRY
One MR11 Accounting document was posted for against 100 EAdelivery cost quantity.
The Po is now in closed status (DCI ticked)
I run MB5S report against this PO, the report is showing the diffrences that 65.41TRY delivery cost was received (GR) against one vendor and delivery cost Invoice was posted against other vendor
PO -line item Fright.Vendor-Received Qty- Qty Invoiced-GR value-Invoice mount- Currency
XXXXXX 10 --- ABC --- 0 EA - 100EA-0- 65.41 --- TRY
XXXXXX -10 --- EFG ---100 EA- 0 EA- 65.41- 0 --- TRY
Due to MB5S report is showing the differences, I tried to run MR11 Transaction against this PO but system is showing " No data selected"
Request Gurus, please clarify me.. why MB5S report is showing differneces and why MR11 transaction is not showing any differences against the same PO
Regards,
Subbu

Gurus,
pliease help me in ths issue

Details about MB5S Report

Hi MM experts,
Can I know what details we can get from the MB5S report?
Is it provides only the POs in which quantity as per GR (MIGO) differs from quantity as per IR (MIRO)?
As per my view, it throughs the details about the pending IRs to be done against a PO.
Can some one input some detailed light on this report?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramnath.

Hi Raghavendra,
1. If the qty/value as per GR is equal to qty/values as per IR, whether MB5S report displayes this PO also?
2. If delivery cost is involved in GR and IR relating to delivery cost was not done and
the qty/value as per GR is equal to qty/values as per IR related to Material (i.e. IR was done for material vendor in which the value/ qty is same in GR and IR but IR was not done for Delivery cost) , is it going to display this PO in this report?
Am I clear on my explanations.......
Pls. suggest me on this.
Regards,
Ramnath

MB5S with invoicing party

Hello experts,
We use a third party process to purchase raw material.
We would like to get a report with the value of the invoice we pay to the third party and the vendor name (or code) with of course material groups.
Because the third party is always the same for raw material, but vendors are different ones.
Is there a standard report like MB5S where we have acces to the invoicing party ?
Many thanks for your help

Hi. Please see same thread in other forum:
Invoicing party Partner Functions from ECC will be replicated to SRM
Regards,
Dave.

MB5S-Clearing the GRIR Balances

Hi
When I run MB5S report the following balances appear.
Example 1
PO                - XXXX
Line item        - XX
Con type         -X
Qty recd         -100
Qty invoiced    -100
GRValue          -90
invoice Amt     -100
(Diff cal value) - 10
Example 2
PO                - XXXX
Line item        - XX
Con type         -X
Qty recd         -100
Qty invoiced    -100
GRValue          -100
invoice Amt     -90
(Diff cal value) - 10
These balances are also appearing in FBL3N but not showing up in MR11 for clearing. Kindly advise how to clear these balances.
with regards
Ramesh Y

Hi:
PO - XXXX
Line item - XX
Con type -X
Qty recd -100
Qty invoiced -100
GRValue -90
invoice Amt -100
I think about it again, it is possible for you scenario, I assume at the beginning PO price is 9, then quantity is 10, so once you do GR, GR value is 90, after that you find the price of PO in incorrect, then you go to me22n to update the price to 10, once you do MIRO, then invoice amount will be changed to 100.
Once you do MIRO, it will debit 90 to GR/IR to clear GR/IR, and 10 is to debit to inventory G/L account, so please confirm which price is correct so that I will help you to adjust accordingly.

MB5S & ME80FN

What is the difference between MB5S GR/IR list and ME80FN Purchase order history report.....
I feel both were same...but in MB5S all the PO history i am not getting......

Hi,
MB5S REPORT:
This report used for purchase orders where Goods Receipt (GR) quantities and Invoice Receipt (IR) quantities do not balance. You can view the purchasing organization, purchasing group, Vendor, Purchasing document Number, Item Number,Received quantity, Quantity invoiced {invoice quantity and amount will be zero if no invoice receipt was posted for items received}, order unit, GR value, Invoice amount, and Currency. This information can be used to determine if errors have occurred in posting goods receipts and/or invoice receipts or to determine open purchase orders where goods receipts have been posted and still awaiting the vendor invoice.
ME80FN REPORT:
This report can be used for displaying the information of purchase orders created and the transactions that has taken place where you can drill down and summarize data. You also can check this report when there is a need to view purchasing documents relating to request for quotations, purchase orders and contracts.
Regards,
Biju K

Get all values from request.getParameter

In ASP, I can do something like that...
For each item in Request.Form
Response.write "Name is:" & item & " value is:" & Request(item)
Next
How about in JSP? How do i get the names and values of the form using a loop?

You can use request.getParameterNames() which will return an enumeration, then you can iterate through the enumeration and use request.getParameterValue(String paramName) method to get the values.

Error while assigning a character value to a numeric variable.

I fire a sql statement and check the number of rows returned by the sql.
I check this result with the application logs.
The application logs keeps the sqls fired by the application and the no of rows returned, in the example below the sql returned 8454 rows.
My script compares the two results.
***********Application Log***********
4/14/2008 11:15:01 AM: 0059 SQL SELECT "CLUSTER_CD",
4/14/2008 11:15:01 AM: 0060 "PRODUCT_DESC",
4/14/2008 11:15:01 AM: 0061 "TEAM_CD"
4/14/2008 11:15:01 AM: 0062 FROM "OPS$TMS"."MAP_CLUSTER_TEAM_PROD"
4/14/2008 11:15:01 AM: 3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD, 8,454 lines fetched
***********Application Log***********
My script:
#!/bin/ksh
typeset -i resA
typeset -i resB
opstms_conn_string="abc/[email protected]"
set `sqlplus -s $opstms_conn_string << EOF
set pages 0
WHENEVER SQLERROR CONTINUE
SELECT count(*)
FROM MAP_CLUSTER_TEAM_PROD;
exit
EOF`
resA=$1 ##returns 8454
resB=`grep '3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD,' BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log | awk '{print $10}'`
##resB returns 8,454
## here i get syntax error
if [ $resA -eq $resB ]; then
echo "QA passed for sql1"
else
echo "QA failed for sql1"
fi
The problem is as resB is integer variable it does not accept character value: 8,454 so returns a syntax error:
How do I change the value assigned to resB into a numeric variable?
error:
+ grep 3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD, BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log
run.ksh[52]: 8,454: syntax error

Change:
resB=`grep '3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD,' BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log | awk '{print $10}'`
to this:
resB=`grep '3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD,' BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log | awk '{print $10}' | tr -d ,`
to drop the comma. Or you could do it in awk(1):
resB=`grep '3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD,' BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log | awk '{ gsub( /,/, "", $10 ); print $10}'`
Or you could to it all in awk(1):
resB=`awk '
/3 fields found: CLUSTER_CD, PRODUCT_DESC, TEAM_CD/ {
gsub( /,/, "", $10 )
print $10
' BCVP_Main_Loader.qvw.log`
(This example was not tested, it's just for a model.)
Someone more of an SQL guru than I can probably tell you how to change your numeric locale to avoid presenting those commas in the first place and avoid the problem.
HTH

Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi

Query help : Query to get values SYSDATE-1 18:00 hrs to SYSDATE 08:00 hrs

Hi Team
I want the SQl query to get the data for the following comparison : -
Order Created is a Date Column , and i want to find out all the values from (SYSDATE-1) 18:00 hours to SYSDATE 08:00 hours
i.e.
(SYSDATE-1) 18:00:00 < Order.Created < SYSDATE 08:00:00.
Regards

Hi, Rohit,
942281 wrote:
If i want the data in the below way i.e.
from (SYSDATE-1) 18:00 hours to SYSDATE 17:59 hours ---> (SYSDATE-1) 18:00:00 < Order.Created < SYSDATE 07:59:00.If you want to include rows from exactly 18:00:00 yesterday (but no earlier), and exclude rows from exatly 08:00:00 today (or later), then use:
WHERE   ord_dtl.submit_dt >= TRUNC (SYSDATE) - (6 / 24)
AND     ord_dtl.submit_dt < TRUNC (SYSDATE) + (8 / 24)
So can i use the below format : -
ord_dtl.submit_dt BETWEEN trunc(sysdate)-(6/24) and trunc(sysdate)+(7.59/24) . Please suggest . .59 hours is .59 * 60 * 60 = 2124 seconds (or .59 * 60 = 35.4 minutes), so the last time included in the range above is 07:35:24, not 07:59:59.
If you really, really want to use BETWEEN (which includes both end points), then you could do it with date arithmentic:
WHERE   ord_dtl.submit_dt BETWEEN TRUNC (SYSDATE) - (6 / 24)
                  AND         TRUNC (SYSDATE) + (8 / 24)
                                           - (1 / (24 * 60 * 60))but it would be simpler and less error prone to use INTERVALs, as Karthick suggested earlier:
WHERE   ord_dtl.submit_dt BETWEEN TRUNC (SYSDATE) - INTERVAL '6' HOUR
                  AND         TRUNC (SYSDATE) + INTERVAL '8' HOUR
                                           - INTERVAL '1' SECONDEdited by: Frank Kulash on Apr 17, 2013 9:36 AM
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Apr 17, 2013 11:56 AM
Changed "- (8 /24)" to "+ (8 /24)" in first code fragment (after Blushadown, below)

Unable to capture return values in web services api

At the time of login to web services if my server is down ,
it returns following error :
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1
        at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1438)
        at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1411)
I want to capture this error so that i can try another server to login. how do i capture this error
Another place where i want to capture the return Value is when i look for a report on the server
rh = boBIPlatform.get("path://InfoObjects/Root Folder/"src_folder"/" + reportName +
                           "@SI_SCHEDULEINFO,SI_PROCESSINFO" ,oGetOptions);
oInfoObjects = rh.getInfoObjects();
CrystalReport = (CrystalReport)oInfoObjects.getInfoObject(0);
Here if the report is not there on the server , it returns a null handler exception.
but if i try catching it by checking my responsehandler is null like rh == null it does not catch it.
Any help will be appreciated
thanks
Rakesh Gupta

Ted : i have two cases
1)   server = server_st.nextToken();
    providerURL = "http://"server"/dswsbobje/services";
    sessConnURL = new URL(providerURL + "/session");
   Connection boConnection = new Connection(sessConnURL);
   Session boSession = new Session(boConnection);
EnterpriseCredential boEnterpriseCredential = new    EnterpriseCredential();
              boEnterpriseCredential.setLogin(userid);
boEnterpriseCredential.setPassword(pwd);
boEnterpriseCredential.setAuthType(auth);
SessionInfo boSI = boSession.login(boEnterpriseCredential);
I have got a list of servers running web servcies stored in my tokens. when i pass the first server name say " test:8080" and that server is down , i want to catch somewhere in the code above that it did not get the connection so that i can loop back and try with the second server say test1:8080
This is for failover purposes.
at present when i was trying to capture return value of boSI it breaks giving the error
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1
at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1438)
at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1411)
2nd case :
I am geeting reports from the server and scheduling them:
i run the following code which works fine if reports is there
rh = boBIPlatform.get("path://InfoObjects/Root Folder/"src_folder"/" + reportName +
"@SI_SCHEDULEINFO,SI_PROCESSINFO" ,oGetOptions);
oInfoObjects = rh.getInfoObjects();
CrystalReport = (CrystalReport)oInfoObjects.getInfoObject(0);
Here if the report is not there on the server then i should be able to catch from the response handle rh that it has got a null value.
but rh does not return a null value
the code ultimately throws a null handle at the following line
CrystalReport = (CrystalReport)oInfoObjects.getInfoObject(0);
i am not able to catch the null value there also.
hope you got my issue.

MB5S - GR Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for