MB5S with invoicing party

Hello experts,
We use a third party process to purchase raw material.
We would like to get a report with the value of the invoice we pay to the third party and the vendor name (or code) with of course material groups.
Because the third party is always the same for raw material, but vendors are different ones.
Is there a standard report like MB5S where we have acces to the invoicing party ?
Many thanks for your help

Hi. Please see same thread in other forum:
Invoicing party Partner Functions from ECC will be replicated to SRM
Regards,
Dave.

Similar Messages

Replacement of MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party

Hi,
As per one of our business requirement, we want to replace MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party (EKKO-LFRKE) for correct tax calculation during MIRO.
For that we tried to apply BAdis suggested as per SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment and others. But these BAdis are not enough useful to resolve above problem.
Pls suggest another BAdi / exit for above problem, which can replace MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) during MIRO .
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
below is our business scenario :
"PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master).
While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head
office vendor (as mentioned in master). The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the
HO vendor.
for above problem, I have been suggested Note 1156325 from the forum, but none of the BAdi seems feasible (checked with our SAP ABAP Consultant) for this requirement to replace MIRO Invoicing Party (RBKP-LIFNR) with PO Invoicing Party (EKKO-LFRKE).
It would be great help if u can suggest ny BAdi / exit for this requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

PO vendor is not an invoicing party

Hi,
Would like to seek for help for the following scenerio,unable to post transaction from MIRO to FICO during invoice verification level with the above subject.
Later, we found out the capex purchase order have worngly selected an invalid vendor which was the vendor is not created under our company code but the purchase order instead created the same purchasing organization and the purchase order have been posted previous fiscal year and the Material Management module period have been close.
Later, we try to extend the vendor which was selected worngly to our company code in order to proceed with the MIRO to resolve the problem. However, we still not able to proceed with the miro as system trigger error message item is invalid.
Please advise.

First check, whether the vendor is defined as invoicing party.
Secondly. you can overcome by taking the help of partner function. Check the account group to which the vendor master is assigned. Check what partner function schema can be assigned to the account group.If the partner function schema allows you to assign a different vendor as the invoicing party, please, then create a new vendor master, define it as an invoicing party and assign it to the wrongly entered vendor as an invoicing party on behalf.
I hope, you can overcome the issue.
Regards,
Ranjan

Business Partner Invoicing Party from vendor master in ECC

Hi!
Does anyone have experience from using partner function invoicing party in vendor master in ECC, and copying it over til business partner in SRM.
We have business requirements to have several invoicing parties for a specific vendor. In ECC, if you do this set up, you get a pop up when creating a purchase order. In the pop-up you are asked to select the invoicing party that should be used for the purchase order. We would like to have similar functionality in SRM. What are the possibiliies?
We have configured SRM with partner determination schema. This allows us to define an invoiceing party in SRM purchase order. However we would like to get suggestions based on what has been maintained in the vendor master in ECC. What actions need to be taken to obtain this? Does anyone have experience?
Many thanks,
Christine Hammerströ

This could be a big gap in SAP.
Vendor master did not fully synchronised with SRM.
Classic, you may not find this difficulty and we may not require to take this invoicing party.
this is one factor needs to considered before go for technical scenario but sap can do any thing...
check with SAP.
muthu

Satus problem with Third party sales process

Hi Friends,
I have an issue with thrid party sales order processing
Step#1
My client runs the sales order for
Material Qty
p-100 10
p-101 10
p-102 10
step-2
Purchase requisition created and from vendor delivery happened
Step-3
My user created billing with reference of sales order for below material
Material quantity
p-100 20
p-101 10
p-102 20
step-4
user found mistake and he cancelled the invoice and created new billing document
for
material quantity
p-100 10
p-102 10
again he found mistake and cancelled this billing document and create one more billing document with reference of sales order
material quantity
p-100 10
p-101 10
p-102 10
now the issue is for p-100 and p-101 it showing being process and p-101 it showing status as completed
please suggest m

Dear Amar,
please see the billing document which you have cancelled and see the status of the item as well as you are saying,
that two items are cancelled, so i believe it is the sap functionality that it is showing the uncancelled item as complete.
also if the user has cancelled the whole document
kindly check all the documents again and then tell me
revert if helpful
Mohit Singh

MIRO - Invoice Party - User Exit needed

Hi,
I have a requirement like this....
On MIRO tcode, the i need to put a condition if the user gives a Inv Party (3rd tab 'Details' on Header data of MIRO screen) other than the defalut one (vendor which comes by default with the PO)
<u>Inputs to MIRO are :</u>
1. invoice date on first tab of header data
2. Existign PO number in Purchase Order/Scheduling Agreement ( just below the header data block
3. in 3rd tab of header details (Details tab), on Inv.Party field, it takes the vendor number by default when we give the 2nd input (PO number)
Can any body tell, which function module exit to work with ?
PLEASE DO NOT GIVE ME the list of exits and badis by executing the ZUSEREXIT program.
I have already done this.
I would like to know which user exit to select out of this total exits.
Thanks for your Help
"Share and Learn"

Hi Ali,
My requirement is like,
the user should not be allowed to give the Invoice Party field - value as different from the one different from the vendor number which already assigned to the PO while PO Creation.
Please read the query in this thread for more details.
I have found the list of exits, for MIRO, by executing ZUSEREXIT, and i got a list of exits and one BADI. But I am not sure which Exit will work for my requirements.
========== xxx ============
Please, also tell me, how to identify the exact 'function module exit' which suits to our requirement, from the set of all exits displayed after executing ZUSEREXIT program. (approaches/methods , u follow to identify)
Thanks

Invoiceing party at header level in MIRO

Hi,
We have different invoicing parties defined for the same vendor at the plant level in Alternative Data. But, the invoicing party in MIRO is at the header level. When we do MIRO by vendor, it does pull in all the POs but those POs have different IPs because they are from different plants. However, in MIRO, the system deposits the IP from the first PO at the header level and will create the A/P for all the POs against that IP.
Any way around this? To make the system determine the IP from the underlying PO and do the MIRP-A/P accordingly i.e. post the A/P to the correct IP defined in the PO? Of course, we could do MIRO by plant but considering the very high volumes and the number of plants we have, that is rather inefficient and we would prefer doing it by the vendor code if possible.
Thanks.

Dear Tengku
Please try with this.
Go to V/08, for the net value field, maintain Routine 16 in the Alt. Cal. Type. Also add Routine 17 to Netvalue.
As you know Condition types are assigned at each item level. So rounding off is calculated at each item level. But by assigning a tick in the Group Condition while defining Rounding off Condition, you can do rounding off at invoice level. The difference is automatically adjusted at each item.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Different invoicing party

Hi!
We have problem when the invoice is being sent from a sub contractor. We are creating a PO in SRM 550 with vendor A. Vendor A gives the vendor B the assignment. Vendor B delivers the material and sends the invoice. When invoice (idoc) arrives it is getting stuck in MIR6 since invoicing party differs from PO.
I have seen that one can register an Invoicing Party (PI) in Vendor Master in back end. I have registered Invoicing Party for Vendor A and entered Vendor B. I have updated the vendor in SRM.
Still, the error occurs in MIR6.
Any ideas? Have I forgotten a configuration step?
Sincerely
Anders

Ashok,
Have you assigned your account group to the partner role PI? This is found under the partner role configuration. This should address your problem.
Gus

Invoicing party change

Hi all,
My problem is like this:
I have received the GR from XYZ Vendor. The entries was posted correctly with GR/IR Clearing.
and made the PO for the same with no 1234.
Now my user using the PO 1234 and changed the invoicing party in MIRO as ABC. The system allowed and passed the entries though i didnt maintain the partner function in the vendor masters. this ABC was another Vendor in this company. The entries passed the changed vendor (ABC).
Here i need to stop passing entries like this. I want a error message to prevent, this means system should not allow to use the PO for other vendors.
what customization i need to do this?
Best Regards,
Soma

Hi!
You can tried to Disply in Invoice party in greay area (Diplay mode), you can tried to make validation in MIRO.
thanks
Rup

MIRO user exist for invoicing party

Dear Experts ,
I have a requirement where in i need the system to automatically pick a different invoicing party ( as per pre defined logic ) .
Please suggest me SPECIFIC exit / BAPI where in i can fit my logic so that the system suggest the invoicing party in MIRO transaction as per requirement .
Regards
Anis

Hello Wojciech,
Thanks for the prompt response .
I did locate the BADI - INVOICE_UPDATE, but , as per discussions with my technical team & note 1156325 , the data changed in the BAdI is not processed further in the standard program MIRO.
Further , as specified in note 1156325 there is only one relevant BADI for MIRO , that is MRM_TRANSACT_DEFAULT
, but it cannot change/default the invoicing party in MIRO.
My requirement is that I want to populate a different invoicing party as per the documnet for which the invoice is being booked via tcode MIRO.
Please suggest how can this be done .
Regards
Anis

Shipment cost document - Service agent differnt from invoice party

hi all ,
i have a shipment where the SA is differnt from the invoice party .
the SA isnt configured in the system for pricing and the invoice party ( Other SA ) is configured .
1) how can i open the the shipment document with the relvant cost that defined in the system for the
invoice party ?
2) im trying to transfer the shipment document but when i save i get the following mesage :
" no purchase item is found for shipment cost item $0001 000001 " .
i want the system to look for the purchase order that was opened for the invoicing party .
i try to look in badi - scd_po_select but no luck so far .
does any body have an idea ?
thanks in advance,
ASA
Edited by: ASA MOKED on Apr 22, 2009 7:34 PM
Edited by: ASA MOKED on Apr 25, 2009 4:10 PM

Integration with with 3rd Party Document management System

Hi
We are implementing Invoice Management in SAP, using the Opentext VIM ECC Addon.
The Customer has a 3rd Party Document Management System called DocHarbour which is NOT Archivelink enabled.
The process flow is that Invoices will be scanned and available in a share drive somewhere.
Using SAP and Invoice Management Work, we would like to attached these documents to the relevant SAP Documents, and then post them to the 3rd Party Doc Management System , but the Images must be retreival in SAP at any time .
Everything tells me the 3rd party Doc Management System needs to be ArchiveLink enabled for this work.
Is anyone able to shed any light on this issue , provide possible solutions , workarounds or infor ?
Any help or information appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Dear Minesh
My suggestion would be use SAP Content server provided by SAP as is easily available and easy to setup.
Doing Integration with third party involves much time and efforts.
Client always thinks of Moon. Always show him his city.
With Regards
Mangesh Pande

MIRO: blocking the modification of the filed "invoicing party"

Hi All,
With reference to the t.code MIRO, I'd like to know if is possible to block the modification of the filed "invoicing party" in the tab "invoice"
THANKS

can you try if it is there in field selection

Invoicing Party relationship not carried through to PO in ECC

SRM 5 extended classic SPK12
Hello Gurus
We have our vendors synchronised with our R3 backend including the Invoicing parties. This all appears to work ok and can see them individually if we use BP. However, when we attempt to raise a PO against the actual order VN vendor #, when we check in ECC using ME23N, we do not see the invoicing party mentioned in the Partners tab, which causes problems when paying.
Have I forgotten something or am wrongfully assuming that the partnering function that is visible in ECC, does not carry through to SRM?
I've tried to go through all notes but don't see anything in there, which leads me to believe it's really obvious.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

Can anybody help?

Invoicing Party In MIRO

Hi,
My problem is when I am doing MIRO the most of the fields in the header section loaded to the screen according to the PO one of the field is Invoice Party in the Detail Tab with label Inv. Party. But itu2019s open for input it means that user can change the invoice party and will go ahead. Now I donu2019t want that. user should not change the Invoice Party in MIRO for that I want to make this field only input field (Gray Filed).
I am trying to do same with Screen variant (SHD0) but there is some problem, so kindly request please arrane to give some document on this issue
If still have any doubt please revert back
Thanks in Advance
Warm Regards,
Mukesh Chejara

hi
best way is to change the message settings to ERROR.
WHen you change it the message must b coming like below
Account has been changed: Dependent data will be initialised
Message no. F5A119
so change this msg to ERROR with the help of ABAP guy.
check this thread
Problem in MIRO(IV)
for SHD0 take help of ur abaper
First you have to go in SHD0 and you will enter Screen Name ex
"miro" and the trasaction variant name you want to create (F5).
It will take you to MIRO and you will enter values. A window
will pop up asking you to check whatever you want to make
mandatory. Go through and save. Up at the top menu once you
get back to SHD0 initial screen, at the top menu, you will find
Deactivate Standard variant and again enter the Variant you want
to assign and go to the top menu and click assign variant. This
should work. It worked for me.
regards
kunal
Edited by: kunal ingale on Nov 14, 2008 8:02 AM

MB5S with invoicing party

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for