MBAM 2.5 / Temp User Exempt

Greetings All,
Quick question, on a test system I am using to test out MBAM, I selected the request exemption option which displayed the contact name and phone number as I had setup in the GPO, and it now shows in the reports as Temp User Exemption. The question
becomes, how the heck do I clear that, or tell the user (ie my test self) to go pound sand and encrypt their computer?

If i am getting you right, you want the inability of the users to postpone the encryption. If this it is, then there is a group policy in MBAM 2.5 "Encryption
Policy Enforcement Settings". If you set the grace period to "0", it will not prompt the user to start or postpone the encryption. The encryption will automatically start in the background when TPM is the only protector. If additional
protector for PIN is defined, User will be prompted for a compulsion dialogue box to provide the PIN which user cannot cancel out.
Regards, "Gaurav Ranjan" =========== NOTE: Mark as Answer and Vote as Helpful if it helps =======

Similar Messages

HT1766 I can not access my itune/cloud music & apps! My pc crashed & I'm signed on as a temp. user; I can't sign-on ant other way! I lost my icon also

I can not access my itune/cloud music & apps! My pc crashed & I'm signed on as a temp. user; I can't sign-on ant other way! I lost my icon also.

Re: That garbage is unreadable.
If you really want help, stop messing with the fonts and post so that others can read and offer suggestions.
Or better yet... try a search, I'm certain you'll find a solution to whatever issue you're experiencing.
I have found that many times it is the things that make you most angry that push you to action. This was the case here. Thank you for causing me to get so angry that I found the answer myself.

How to recover a deleted temp user profile folders?

I have a user that logged in to their machine a probably ignored the fact that it said it was loggin on a temporary profile. This user has been working off some documents and since it was a laptop only closed the lid instead of doing a shutdown...
A few days later, the users was prompted to reboot the computer to apply windows updates... after the reboot... I guess it logged it to the proper profile and now the user couldn't find documents that were created under my documents.
When I started to look at the laptop and looked at previous version of the C drive that was available, I noticed there was a C:\users\TEMP folder that was there before the reboot containing some of the files but I can't find this folder anymore.
By reading around I found that the temp folder is deleted when logging off? Not sure about that but it sure looks that way. Is there a way we can recover this temp folder... at least the my documents from it?

Hi,
You may try to perform the
System Restore.
Regards,
Sabrina
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does
not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Temp.user profile create in domain loggin in windows 8.1

Dear sir,
Hello I M nikunj Patel.
I install windows 8.1 & i join domain in this system .it's perfectly create domain in client system. but after restarting i logging the domain user . it create temp profile. so help me how to logging without temp. logging

Hi,
This problem can be caused by mutiple reasons, such as permission problem, corrupt user profile, network connection. So, please follow the steps below to troubleshoot your problem.
Firstly, please checked the permissions of domain users.
Secondly, Access to the registry below and delete the old user file.
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList and delete your old profile key that has a ending in s-1-5-21-*.................................bak.
You can refer to the link below for more details about this opertaion:
http://www.sysprobs.com/fix-temporary-profile-windows-7
Note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Multiple temp user folders on sbs2011 new migration

Migrated very well from sbs2008 on failing hardware to sbs2011 on new Dell PowerEdge 320. 40 users. Well very well with only minor issues like losing companyweb page data, not a lot so we just added data back. Now today I see that on the sbs2011 server 1000
c:\user\temp.domain.local folders with one created every second.
Almost looks like a virus. Folders are created faster that I can delete them. All so 0 size.
need suggestions on how to stop this. Thanks
Guzzifrank

Hi Guzzifrank,
Would you please let me know current situation of this issue? Have you fixed it? If any update, please feel
free to let us know.
Just additional. Based on your descriptions, it seems that get error 503 on the SBS 2011 standard. Please refer
to the following articles and check if can help you.
HTTP
Error 503 Accessing Company Web on SBS 2011 Standard
Another
Reason Why Browsing CompanyWeb May Fail with HTTP Error 503 on SBS 2011 Standard
Error 503 Service Unavailable when you browse Windows
SBS websites
Meanwhile, please run
SBS 2011 BPA, then fix issues that it can find and check if can find some more related clues.
If anything I misunderstand, please don’t hesitate to let us know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

Terminal Server 2012 Standard Temp user logon

I have a 2012 r2 server with two virtual servers one is a 2012 standard PDC the other is a 2012 Standard terminal server both are non r2 editions. If I created a new or existing user they get logged on with a temp profile. I have already tried all the
googled fix/repair options, this is my last effort. I have tried the whole delete regedit profilelist and temp files. I have added the user to the local admin and domain admin for testing purposes. I have tried the hot fix kb
2896328. Any help or hint would be helpful.

Hi Matt,
Does the same issue happen on both virtual machines?
Are there any related error messages in the Event Logs?
If there are any, please post them out so that we can better analyze the issue.
Best Regards,
Amy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Temp user profiles

Hi all: I am now testing Windows 7 which will be rolled out to our branch offices. I have created our needed policies an such based on existing policies from our main office Win7 role out. We are running OES2 SP3 and ZCM 11.2.3a. I have everything setup and all appears to work well EXCEPT the user profile in not being created and instead the user is getting a TEMP profile created on the local machine. Furthermore the profile is not getting stored to the user's home directory upon logoff. I have triple checked all the policies and can't find an error. Anyone have this problem and how did you fix it?
Thanks, Chris.

There are some known Win8 issues.
Supposedly if a Device is placed in a Domain, it will work.
I suspect some default Domain GPO settings alter something to allow it
to work, but that is just a guess.
You should be able to get it partially working so things like Desktop
Roam, but tiles and quite a few other things will fail unless in a domain.
On 10/17/2013 2:26 AM, Alix wrote:
>
> Windows7 works fine in our Environment. We give all users a special
> createt Directory "Windows NT 6. Workstation Profile.V2" with only one
> file ntuser.dat, like:
>
> 'Novell Doc: ZENworks 11 SP2 Configuration Policies Reference -
> Assigning a Roaming Profile Policy for a User Profile Stored on a Home
> Directory'
> (http://www.novell.com/documentation/...a/bvkn1sc.html)
>
> In Windows8 this dos'nt work. I try this yesterday. I hope I can find a
> solution in next days.
>
>

'temp' user account in Mail? Hacked?

Can anyone explain why I would have a user named 'temp' listed in the Mail:Accounts tab in Server Admin, but why there isn't a user Temp created on the server or displayed in Workgroup Manager?
A little worried that the server has been compromised as I can think why, or how this account got activated.
Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Stewart
Powerbook G4, Mac Mini Mac OS X (10.4.4) OS X Server 10.4.4
Powerbook G4, Mac Mini OS X Server on Mac Mini

In the past, you may have setup a temp account then deleted it.
When you delete a mail account in WGM, it doesn't delete the actual imap account.
Try this tutorial on 'fully' deleting mail accounts.
http://downloads.topicdesk.com/deletemailusers.pdf
Jeff

Safari (7.0.1) is non-responsive (spinning pinwheel) upon start up. It will work in temp user account but not in my main user acct. I tried reinstall via comman-r prompt on start up but the problem persists. Any suggestion for reinstall or repair?

Safari is non-responsive after intitial start up. Before it can load the homepage (google), it will hang and give a perpetual pinwheel until I force quit the program. Safari works in temporary user account but not in my primary user account. I have reinstalled osx via the command-r upon start up and the problem still persists. Any suggestions on how to reinstall or repair safari?

Thanks for thinking about my problem. I've already experimented with creating a new user, a co-administrator. The programs don't crash when that account is running, just as they don't crash when the guest-user's account runs. So it seems that the problem is limited to the default user's account, which is the one that was running when I installed the updates to the OS and the firmware. Another clue is that the programs that crash as soon as they are launched are *probably* the ones that were open at that time in that account. Yet deleting Saved Application States does not keep the programs from crashing when next launched.
So the mystery continues, but these additional facts will help with the diagnosis, I hope.
Thanks again for your suggestion.
Gordon

User exemption for Bitlocker to Go GPO

Hi,
We are planning to deploy BitLocker to Go GPOs to govern the use of removable devices. May I have some best opinion to exclude few user accounts from BitLocker encryption(Few approved project users should have USB access without any prompts). Welcome
to all suggestions..

You may consider the following policy path in group policy:
Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\BitLocker Drive Encryption\Removable Data Drives
and in Allow users to apply BitLocker protection on removable data drives policy , you could disable it. You may refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee706521

0x803d0013 Error occured sending encryption status (A fault was received from the remote endpoint)

Alright, I am stumped. I have looked at nearly every article on this error here at Technet and other sites:
An error occurred while sending encryption status data.
Error code:
0x803d0013
Details:
A message containing a fault was received from the remote endpoint.
First, I am testing this. I have copied the MDOP ADMX/ADML files directly to the client I am testing this on, and I am applying the policy via the Group Policy Management on the local machine. I am not deploying this via the domain. I wouldn't think that
would make a difference, but please let me know if I am wrong.
I have performed the following:
1. (DisableMachineVerification)
in MBAM registry as
is in this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2612822
2. On the MDOP group policy I have enabled:
I. Client Management
A. Configure MBAM Services
B. Configure user exemption policy
II. Fixed Drive
A. Fixed data drive encryption settings
B. Choose how BitLocker-protected fixed drives can be recovered
III. Operating System Drive
A. Operating system drive encryption settings
B. Choose how BitLocker-protected operating system drives can be recovered
IV. Removable Drive
A. Control use of BitLocker on removable drives
3.
On the MBAM Administration Server AD object, enable the “Trust for delegation for any service (Kerberos Only) option”, under the Delegation tab. Also,
the user has been granted delegation privileges for all of the services on the server.
4. SPN Records have been created for the server
5. HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\FVE\MDOPBitLockerManagement
Change the ClientWakeUpFrequency = 1 and StatusReportingFrequency=1
Create a dword value “NoStartupDelay” under HKLM\Software\Microsoft\MBAM and set its value to 1.
Also, I did not encrypt my drive with MBAM. It was encrypted before hand. Is there anything I can check or do? The event logs on the MBAM server under MBAM-Web don't show anything under Admin or Operational.
I think my KeyRecoveryServiceEndPoint and StatusReportingServiceEndpoint URLs are correct:
https://mbam01.domainname.com:443/MBAMRecoveryAndHardwareService/CoreService.svc
https://mbam01.domainname.com:443/MBAMComplianceStatusService/StatusReportingService.svc
I even think there was a registry key to make the hardware compatible, but I don't remember which key it was, as I uninstalled and reinstalled, and don't remember where I found that on the forums.
Any suggestions?

If you have made changes to the web.config files to accommodate the SSL settings, you will not be able to browse the URLs with the http protocols. The URLs will then only work with the https protocols.
Could you please confirm the login created for the particular local groups with the following permission:-
For MBAM Compliance Auditing DB Access:-
User Mapping – MBAM Compliance Status
DB Role Membership – ComplianceWriteRole
Server Roles – Public
For MBAM
Recovery and Hardware DB access:-
User Mapping – MBAM Recovery and Hardware
DB Role Membership – RecoveryandHardwareReadRole, RecoveryandHardwareWriteRole
Server Roles – Public
Make sure the MBAM Computer account (MBAM Web Server) is a member of these two groups.
Gaurav Ranjan

Users Logged in with Temp Profile on Windows 7

Last year, my company started to experience a strange correlation with the number of Windows 7 computers deployed and the number Help Desk calls regarding Temp Profile Logins. I did open a ticket with Microsoft Support, but had to prematurely put it on hold
due to other projects.
From my work with Microsoft, we performed ETL logging, documented Handle Output, ran Procmon, and collected MSDT data. While not always successfully documented, Microsoft started to point out the possibility a process in the background was timing out. When
timed out, users became logged in as a TEMP user, thus limiting access to network drives and other domain resources.
The company I work for is part of a larger enterprise and other divisions do not experience this issue. This is solely my companies issue and only came to the forefront after we performed a large migration to Windows 7.
Other forums have provided me and my team with the means of fixing the TEMP profile login, after it occurs. We go into REGEDIT and modify the ProfileList and edit the necessary .BAK key. Either way, this corrects the issue, but does not prevent it from occurring
again.
I guess my questions is; where can I look to trouble shoot this better? I can't rely on Microsoft analyzing my records and trying to deduce what is occurring. I want to get more information and find a resolution. Thank you all in advance.

No, we do not use roaming profiles in our environment. Local user profiles are used for every computer, regardless of purpose/role in the organization. Good question, though. Thank you.
Hi,
I would like you to confirm following question with me:
1. are your computers in a domain?
2. What do you mean about the local user profile, the personal user? If it's a domain environment, does this issue happen on domain user account?
3. How did you migrate your user profiles during migrating to Windows 7?
Considering if the local user profile is corrupted, and the regedit fix cannot fix your issue completely.
Please create a new user account on the problematic computer and test for a while to see if the issue still persists.
If not, we may need to repair the corrupted user profiles.
If the issue still persists, considering the system issue.
Please help to collect the logon trace and post back for our research.
1. Logon as an Administrator of the computer you want to trace (either a local Administrator or Domain Admin account that is a member of the local machine's Administrators group).
2. Open an elevated command prompt and run this command from WPT Install directory (default path is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Windows Performance Toolkit.
Install WPT from this link:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb980924.aspx
xperf -on base+latency+dispatcher+NetworkTrace+Registry+FileIO -stackWalk CSwitch+ReadyThread+ThreadCreate+Profile -BufferSize 128 -start UserTrace -on "Microsoft-Windows-Shell-Core+Microsoft-Windows-Wininit+Microsoft-Windows-Folder
Redirection+Microsoft-Windows-User Profiles Service+Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy+Microsoft-Windows-Winlogon+Microsoft-Windows-Security-Kerberos+Microsoft-Windows-User Profiles General+e5ba83f6-07d0-46b1-8bc7-7e669a1d31dc+63b530f8-29c9-4880-a5b4-b8179096e7b8+2f07e2ee-15db-40f1-90ef-9d7ba282188a"
-BufferSize 1024 -MinBuffers 64 -MaxBuffers 128 -MaxFile 1024
Note: This syntax works on Windows Vista (Windows Server 2008) and Windows 7 (Windows Server 2008 R2) computers
3. Press CTRL+ALT+DEL and then Switch User.
4. Logon with the user account experiencing the temp user logon to reproduce the issue.
5. Stop the trace. While logged on with the slow user account, open an elevated CMD prompt and type:
xperf -stop -stop UserTrace -d merged.etl
6. upload the merged.etl file into Onedrive or similar file sharing service, and post back the shared link here.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

MBAM 1.0 test-cases

Hi,
I have deployed MBAM Server+SQL & agent to one of the client machine in testing environment.
I am able to encrypt the laptop & status is now showing as Complaint in Reporting console.Now the main issue is :
1.What will be status of the laptop if i decrypt the drives ?
2. What if ,I Rejoined a encrypted machine into domain ?
3.What If I ,Renamed a computer which has MBAM drive encryption ?
4.Can i delete the hostname from MBAM Compliance report if the host is not reported for more than X days?
Also suggest various test scenarios.
Awaiting for our reply.
Thanks,
David.

You need to enable the policy "Configure user exemption policy"
and can define any of the settings for Phone Number, Mailing Address or Website URL. This message user will
get to request for the exemption.
you need to create a MBAM GPO and filter it out to a following security group of which the exempted computer will be
a member of.
So when you change the compatibility of the machine to compatible, user will be prompted for the encryption. User will
click on the request for the exemption and will get a message to contact the MBAM Administrator by the mean defined in the exemption policy. After the submit of the request MBAM Admin will decide whether to exempt the user from encryption or not.
Method for the exemption:-
- Create a domain security group
- Configure the user exemption policies to exempt user from encryption
- Set a time limit for the exemption.
- Filter out the exemption policy to the created domain security group. add the user as a member of this particular security group.
For more help you can go through this particular link:-
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj571516.aspx
Let us know if it has solved your problem so that other can be benefited from it.
Gaurav Ranjan

SCCM 2012 R2 MBAM Integration

Hey there,
I'm having a bit of trouble importing the SMS_Def.Mof file as per these instructions
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn656927.aspx
Whenever I attempt to import them to the Default Client Settings Hardware Inventory i get the following error message
The MOF file you tried to import could not be compiled. Ensure that the MOF file contains valid data. You can use the command line mofcomp utility to test the data.
When I check the file using mofcomp, it returns no issues.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Jonathon

This is the contents of the file. I think it looks fine, can you confirm that this is correct?
//===================================================
// Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring
//===================================================
#pragma namespace ("\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\\SMS")
#pragma deleteclass("Win32_BitLockerEncryptionDetails", NOFAIL)
[ SMS_Report (TRUE),
SMS_Group_Name ("BitLocker Encryption Details"),
SMS_Class_ID ("MICROSOFT|BITLOCKER_DETAILS|1.0")]
class Win32_BitLockerEncryptionDetails : SMS_Class_Template
[ SMS_Report (TRUE), key ]
String DeviceId;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
String BitlockerPersistentVolumeId;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
String MbamPersistentVolumeId;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
//UNKNOWN = 0, OS_Volume = 1, FIXED_VOLUME = 2, REMOVABLE_VOLUME = 3
SInt32 MbamVolumeType;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
String DriveLetter;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
//VOLUME_NOT_COMPLIANT = 0, VOLUME_COMPLIANT = 1, NOT_APPLICABLE = 2
SInt32 Compliant;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
SInt32 ReasonsForNonCompliance[];
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
SInt32 KeyProtectorTypes[];
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
SInt32 EncryptionMethod;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
SInt32 ConversionStatus;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
SInt32 ProtectionStatus;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
Boolean IsAutoUnlockEnabled;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
String NoncomplianceDetectedDate;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
String EnforcePolicyDate;
#pragma namespace ("\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\\SMS")
#pragma deleteclass("Win32Reg_MBAMPolicy", NOFAIL)
[ SMS_Report(TRUE),
SMS_Group_Name("BitLocker Policy"),
SMS_Class_ID("MICROSOFT|MBAM_POLICY|1.0")]
Class Win32Reg_MBAMPolicy: SMS_Class_Template
[SMS_Report(TRUE),key]
string KeyName;
//General encryption requirements
[SMS_Report(TRUE)]
UInt32 OsDriveEncryption;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 FixedDataDriveEncryption;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 EncryptionMethod;
//Required protectors properties
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 OsDriveProtector;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 FixedDataDriveAutoUnlock;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 FixedDataDrivePassphrase;
//MBAM Agent fields
//Policy not enforced (0), enforced (1), pending user exemption request (2) or exempted user (3)
[SMS_Report(TRUE)]
Uint32 MBAMPolicyEnforced;
[SMS_Report(TRUE)]
string LastConsoleUser;
//Date of the exemption request of the last logged on user,
//or the first date the exemption was granted to him on this machine.
[SMS_Report(TRUE)]
datetime UserExemptionDate;
//Errors encountered by MBAM agent.
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
UInt32 MBAMMachineError;
[ SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
string EncodedComputerName;
//Read Win32_OperatingSystem.SKU WMI property in a new class - because SKU is not available before Vista.
#pragma namespace ("\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\\SMS")
#pragma deleteclass("CCM_OperatingSystemExtended", NOFAIL)
[ SMS_Report (TRUE),
SMS_Group_Name ("Operating System Ex"),
SMS_Class_ID ("MICROSOFT|OPERATING_SYSTEM_EXT|1.0") ]
class CCM_OperatingSystemExtended : SMS_Class_Template
[SMS_Report (TRUE), key ]
string Name;
[SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
uint32 SKU;
//Read Win32_ComputerSystem.PCSystemType WMI property in a new class - because PCSystemType is not available before Vista.
#pragma namespace ("\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\\SMS")
#pragma deleteclass("CCM_ComputerSystemExtended", NOFAIL)
[ SMS_Report (TRUE),
SMS_Group_Name ("Computer System Ex"),
SMS_Class_ID ("MICROSOFT|COMPUTER_SYSTEM_EXT|1.0") ]
class CCM_ComputerSystemExtended : SMS_Class_Template
[SMS_Report (TRUE), key ]
string Name;
[SMS_Report (TRUE) ]
uint16 PCSystemType;
//=======================================================
// Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Monitoring end
//=======================================================

Any new user creation gets: unable to log into user account error

Sort of reposting from http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2795507&tstart=0 as that initial question was answered.
Anyway, running an xserve managing all network accounts (only local accounts are a local admin on each system). DNS checks out and all current users can log in fine. However, it seems any new user I create keeps getting this wonderfully ambiguous error. I've tried Guest (but figured it probably interfered with the Guest Account), Student (but thought it might be interfering with a group of the same name), Guest Student, and Temp User.

Just making sure, you have selected the home location, and then actually pressed the "Create home" button? I have missed it few times and then wondered why it is not working. Then check the home folder location that it is actually there and created successfully.
Yeah, and then hit Save!
Message was edited by: VincensoXFIN

MBAM 2.5 / Temp User Exempt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for