MBAM: Policy is not Enforced

My company recently rolled out MBAM 2.0 SP1 in SCCM. Although the report shows nearly all of them as COMPLIANT, there are a handful that says POLICY IS NOT ENFORCED. Does anyone have further info as to what this means and how to correct it?
I did not find alot on the Internet about it. Any info is appreciated. Thanks.

My guess is that the handful of computer have problems updating group policy. Look at the registry. Are the defined BitLocker settings configured. Try manually updating Group Policy.
Gerry Hampson | Blog:
www.gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.ie | LinkedIn:
Gerry Hampson | Twitter:
@gerryhampson

Similar Messages

MBAM - SCCM 2012 Reports - Error: the 'MBAM Policy' view does not exist

Hi
I have installed MBAM with SCCM 2012 integration. A single server install with SQL server 2012. Mostly it has gone smoothly and laptops are being encrypted and pins stored and recoverable. The problem I have is reports are not showing. I get the following
error message.
"Error: the 'MBAM Policy' view does not exist"
Any ideas why this is? I get the same error message with all 4 reports.

Hi Slycy,
There is another thread that seems to be a similar issue
here that may help you. The last post in particular has a number of steps that you can use to speed up creation of the views:
Just for future reference, there are quite a few things that have to happen before the view is created. This is merely how CM works.
Make MBAM MOF changes
Select TPM spec version in hardware inventory
Install MBAM CM Integration feature
Perform a machine policy refresh cycle on a client to get the MOF changes that need to be inventoried
Perform hardware inventory
Update MBAM Supported Computers collection membership. The machine should appear if it meets the criteria
Run another machine policy refresh on the client so that the Configuration Baseline will come down
Make sure that the MBAM agent has woken up once
Evaluate the Configuration Baseline
The MBAM views should be created now.
You don't have to do this for every machine, but this is the process to speed it up. If you let CM do it, it could take over a week before the view is created the first time, depending on when Hardware inventory runs, etc.
Hope this helps,
David

MBAM Policy Template on DC servers

Hello,
I have a question about install MBAM Policy Template on DC servers.
when i install policy template on DC primary server, policy can not replicate on other DC-s.
i read about this in technet. i found the solution which is add MBAM .admx and .adml files in GPO Central Store in library http://technet.microsoft.com/library/dn659707.aspx.
But i have problem, because Microsoft says to move the .admx and .adml MBAM templates in the specified path
%systemroot%\sysvol\domain\policies\PolicyDefinitions
But in my DC-s i have only path %systemroot%\sysvol\domain\policies\(this
place is a lot of files with names like "bushes"
Help me where i must paste MBAM .admx and .adml templates.

Fir you need to re-direct your group policy management to a central store. At this time when you open the group policy management console and edit a policy, you can notice that the group policy objects been fetched from the local store.
You need to copy the entire folder "PolicyDefinition" from the location "%systemdrive%\Windows\PolicyDefinition" to "\\DC\Sysvol\DomainName\Policies".
After that you will notice that the group policies will be fetched from central store and will be replicated to other DCs.
Gaurav Ranjan

Windows 2012 R2 default domain controllers policy set to enforced

Hi Guys,
So I've migrated my domain from Windows 2003 R2 over to Windows 2012 R2 and so far everything is running ok. Had a few problems relating to orphaned DC's but have cleared this up now. However, i'm now trying to get to grips with using group policy. When
i migrated, the old policy settings seemed to have come across and things seem to be still locked down ok, in relation to certain OUs. I run a network at our local college so i have a student container which applies a lock-down policy. All these GPOs where
previously setup by someone else.
I setup a test network at home before i did the said migration and am now comparing some group policy settings, namely the default ones, and i have noticed that default domain controllers policy has been set to enforced on my newly migrated domain. At home
on my test server i see it is not enforced by default and am wondering why this is? I have been reading up but i can't find anything that tells me it should be enforced but wary to disable this setting. The students return on Monday so i don't want to mess
it up at this stage.
One thing that i did find odd is when i first opened up the GPO's, i was prompted with a message which stated that the policies in the sysvol folder where not consistent with the ones in AD so i followed its recommendation to update.
Any advise you guys have on this would be greatly appreciated.
David

> So I've migrated my domain from Windows 2003 R2 over to Windows 2012 R2
> and so far everything is running ok.
This does NOT touch any GPOs, so your GPOs are not "migrated" or
something like that - they are still what they were before.
> enforced on my newly migrated domain. At home on my test server i see it
> is not enforced by default and am wondering why this is?
"A sever misunderstanding of how group policy inheritance and link order
works" is the closest reason I see for this. The DDCP is linked to
"Domain Controllers", and as long as you do not create subordinate OUs
there (which I've never seen) and block inheritance on them, there's no
reason to enforce.
To add my experience from the field: When I see enforced GPOs, in most
cases this enforcement is not required. People simply use it because
they do not understand "link order".
> One thing that i did find odd is when i first opened up the GPO's, i was
> prompted with a message which stated that the policies in the sysvol
> folder where not consistent with the ones in AD so i followed its
> recommendation to update.
That's fairly ok and nothing to hassle about.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Access Policy is not getting trigggered after creation of user through GTC

Hi,
I have an access policy for ALL USER role and that provision users to an RO after getting created in oim. I have a trusted source flat file reconciliation GTC for user creation. I am facing issue when user is getting created through GTC, access policy is not getting triggered. But while creating an user through web console the same access policy is working fine and user is getting provisioned with RO.
If anybody have any idea how to resolve this, please help me in this regards.
Regards,
Avijit

Hi ,
its good to know that its working. As per my experience it works for once (through reconciliation) but then stops working. Now to confirm try to revoke the user by changing the group member-ship through reconciliation and see if the resource is revoked or not (repeat it for 2 -3 times). Note that don't do it form within IDM web admin console, do it through reconciliation.
do post your results.......
Regards.

Package com.adobe.flashaccess.sdk.policy does not exist

[ Problem ]
We are trying to create policy. We have set the class path and referring adobe-flashaccess-sdk.jar, adobe-flashaccess-certs.jar and also we have copied jsafe.jar into class path directory.
I am getting error. package com.adobe.flashaccess.sdk.policy does not exist error.
Is any other .jar file needs to be included.
[ Solution ]
Page 11 of the Protecting Content document lists all of the .jar files required to use the Flash Access SDK:
adobe-flashaccess-certs.jar
adobe-flashaccess-sdk.jar
bcmail-jdk15-141.jar
bcprov-jdk15-141.jar
commons-discovery-0.4.jar
commons-logging-1.1.1.jar
jaxb-api.jar
jaxb-impl.jar
jaxb-libs.jar
relaxngDatatype.jar
rm-pdrl.jar
xsdlib.jar
jsafe.jar or jsafeWithNative.jar
Please check to make sure you have all the above .jar files on your classpath. You also may want to check out the sample code and Ant built script located in the samples directory of the Reference Implementation Command Line Tools. The Ant script contains targets for both compiling and running the samples, including creating a policy.

No, I don't think you want to just copy the 4 jar files to your /lib/ext Java SDK directory. What you want to do is to run the Java3D install program to install Java 3D to the Java SDK or JRE you specify. The install will also copy some .DLL files since part of Java3D is implemented using native methods. Without the DLLs, I would guess that you can compile programs okay but will run into errors trying to run them. No clue why the install wouldn't work on XP, but maybe the install needs a JRE to run and you need to install Sun's JRE or SDK using their install program - Microsoft used to include their own Java SDK implementation in Windows, but then took it out for Windows XP to try and deprecate Java. The install EXE might be expecting a Windows registry setting that points to a JRE or SDK for it to use.

Folder Redirection policy is not applied to a user, when the server target is changed, but works after resetting the windows profile.

Folder Redirection policy is not applied to a user, when the server target is changed.
After server target is changed via group policy, when user login (roaming profile)first time, the the new server target has not been applied, instead it's pointing to the old folder redirection path.
But if we reset the windows profile (roaming ), the new folder redirection works, can you please specify a solutions that the new folder redirection works when the user login for the first time. so it reduce the time on resetting users profile.
it seems that we need to delete the old folder redirection path from the user profile (roaming user profile) via group policy or similar solutions..
Many Thanks

> But when the specific users login they all get the same error, it
Is the old server removed from the domain? Seems so - or some other
authentication related issue, hard to tell from here...
> seems that the roaming user profiles still keeps the old server details,
Yes - if you change redirection targets, FR moves content from old to
new, and only if this ends sucessfully, it will update the redirection
target.
Make the old redirection target accessible to the user and you'll be fine.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Diagnostics policy service not running on Windows 7 home premium

I'm unable to connect to internet through wireless connectionsr . it says limited access to wi-fi router. When i try to fix this it says diagnostics policy service not running. Checked services.msc While the type is set up to automatic Unable to start the
service. I had similar problem with my LAN connection. After resetting my LAN connection i was able to connect to internet. Tried this on wifi as well but the issue remains.
Error code is 5: access denied

Hi,
Thanks for the post!
Go to your Device Manager and uninstall the network device, including the wireless network card, then restart the computer. Let the system automatically reinstall the driver for you. You can also manually update the network card driver to the latest one.
After that, check if you can connect to the internet.
For the Diagnostics policy service issue. please click Start, input regedit in the search box, press Enter to open your Registry Editor, navigate to the key:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\DPS\Parameters.
Right click this key, choose permission, click the user "Trustedinstaller", ensure the permission is set to "Full Control" and "Read". Then click OK to apply the change.
Restart the computer to check if this service is working now.
Regards,
Miya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. | Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer
your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

ERROR: policy does not allow granting permissions at this level outlook

Hi All,
Our users are attempting to send sharing requests to each other via Right Click Calendar | Share | Share Calendar
Availabilty only works fine but Limited and Full Access fails with the error: policy does not allow granting permissions at this level.
I can see that the default sharing policy is set for availabilty only so I assume I need to add our internal SMTP addresses to the sharing policy with increased right's.
But... From our testing in our LAB we found that if the exchange org does not have a connection to the federation setup it works fine straigh out of the box.
Does this sound right or is my LAB just messing with me?
Cheers
Josh

Hi VK, looks like these threads should resolve your problem:
Assembly does not allow partially trusted
callers
"That assembly
does not allow partially trusted callers."
That assembly does not allow
partially trusted callers
Assembly does not allow partially
trusted callers.
WPF Assembly does not allow
partially trusted callers
cameron rautmann

Retention Policy is not auto archiving email

Hi, I created a new Retention Policy and attached 2 Retention Tags.
I have a mailbox that is 18 GB and i need for all items\folders to be transferred to the same folder structure in the archive.
The archive is presently empty, i only see a deleted items folder and the retention policy is not moving emails automatically.
The Retention Tags attached to the policy are:
Tag Type: Personal Tag, Age Limit for Retention 365 days, Move to Archive
and
Tag Type: All other folders in the mailbox, Age Limit for Retention 365 days, Move to Archive
I also tried running the start Start-ManagedFolderAssistant cmdlet.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,

Hi,
For the personal tag you created as follows, and users need to apply this tag to items from Outlook side.
Personal Tag, Age Limit for Retention 365 days, Move to Archive
For the "All other folders in the mailbox", if you choose the option of All other folders in the mailbox, then this would be a DPT. The DPT is applied to any folder that doesn't have a Retention Tag associated with it.
The action "Move to Archive" moves a message to the user's archive mailbox. If the mailbox user doesn't have an archive mailbox, no action is taken. So please make sure you have enabled archive on this user mailbox.
Once a retention policy is applied to a user mailbox, then the retention policy tag for an item will appear in the header in the Reading Pane. Please check whether you can see the retention policy description when you open a message in Outlook.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

10.4.11 Policy Key Not Responding

I opened my activity monitor to check on a current process then noticed in red, Policy Key Not Responding. It had 4 hangs as well. I have repaired disk permissions and that is about it. My question is, is there a security problem of some sort when my Policy Key is not responding and secondly how can i fix this. Thanks for the help.

Here is what is listed when I check the info from the process. Its parent process is called Window Server 64. Not sure what any of the below means.
/Applications/PolicyKey.app/Contents/MacOS
/Applications/PolicyKey.app/Contents/MacOS/PolicyKey
/System/Library/CoreServices/CharacterSets/CFUnicodeData-B.mapping
/System/Library/CoreServices/CharacterSets/CFCharacterSetBitmaps.bitmap
/Library/Caches/com.apple.IntlDataCache.sbdl.501
/usr/lib/libxml2.2.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/HIToolbox.fram ework/Versions/A/Resources/Extras.rsrc
/usr/lib/dyld
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/CarbonCo re.framework/Versions/A/CarbonCore
/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/OSServic es.framework/Versions/A/OSServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/Metadata .framework/Versions/A/Metadata
/System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Versions/A/Security
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/OpenScripting. framework/Versions/A/OpenScripting
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/P rintCore.framework/Versions/A/PrintCore
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/L aunchServices.framework/Versions/A/LaunchServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/HTMLRendering. framework/Versions/A/HTMLRendering
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/NavigationServ ices.framework/Versions/A/NavigationServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/HIToolbox.fram ework/Versions/A/HIToolbox
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/SearchKi t.framework/Versions/A/SearchKit
/usr/lib/libstdc++.6.0.4.dylib
/usr/lib/libicucore.A.dylib
/usr/lib/libcrypto.0.9.7.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/C olorSync.framework/Versions/A/ColorSync
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/CFNetwor k.framework/Versions/A/CFNetwork
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/A TS.framework/Versions/A/ATS
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/I mageIO.framework/Versions/A/ImageIO
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/I mageIO.framework/Versions/A/Resources/libJP2.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/I mageIO.framework/Versions/A/Resources/libTIFF.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/C oreText.framework/Versions/A/CoreText
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio.framework/Versions/A/CoreAudio
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DesktopServicesPriv.framework/Versions/A/Deskt opServicesPriv
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
/dev/null
/dev/console
/dev/console
obj=0x0243aea0
obj=0x02503ee0
obj=0x0243aea0

Policy Domain not found

Hy everybody!
Please help me, I have problem with Policy Doman,
when I test access with option Access Tester on my Policy Domain,
i get following message:
Evaluation result
Policy Domain <not found>
I checked in OID, my Policy Domain exists in following entry
obname=policy_domain_id, obapp=PSC, o=Oblix <DN>
but as you see error says that Policu Domain not found.
best regards!

Hi!
I have :
- 2 Authorization Rules
- 1 Default Authentication Rule
- 1 Default Authorization Expression
I checked Host identifier with ping command, it's correct.
Do you have any ideas about problem?
On following URL I posted picture of the my Policy Domain
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8909/policydomainhx6.jpg
<img src="http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8909/policydomainhx6.th.jpg" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" />

"Your organization's policy does not allow you to share with this recipient." When trying to share calendar within our Org

Hi,
Wondering if this is a bug - we have serveral different accepted domains, and our users within our org might have different primary SMTP domains - some @nwtraders.com and some @contoso.com - as examples.
We had a user today report an issue where they were trying to use the 'share calendar' button in Outlook 2010 and then typed in the SMTP address of someone in our org in the field of whom to share with, but that address had a different SMTP domain
than the user's (but still in our org). When she tried to send the sharing request she received a popup stating:
Calendar sharing is not available with the following entries because of permission settings on your network:
<intended smtp address>: Your organization's policy does not allow you to share with this recipient.
I thought it might be related to freeform typing in the address - if I hand type out the address with a valid SMTP address within the same SMTP domain, and press send it works.
If I use the address picker, and pick the intended sharing recipient (who's has an SMTP domain that is different that the senders), it works fine. It only seems to have an issue when you manually type out the address and it's not in the same SMTP domain
as you....
Could this 'problem' be masked with setting up Sharing policy between all of our authoritative domains?
Thanks

Looks like Microsoft has an answer as to whether this is to be expected: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983062/en-us In my research into this, the error you are receiving is a common thing people have run into and they are all using the solution MS lists
in their KB article. Hope that helps.
JAUCG - Please remeber to mark replies as helpful if they were or as answered if I provided a solution.

SCCM Client Policy instance "The body for this policy has not been downloaded."?

Hi,
With PolicySpy I got SCCM Client Policy instance with an red and white symbol "The body for this policy has not been downloaded." what does that mean?
/SaiTech

Hi,
Is there something not working? What is the core issue?
-It is a long story, I will take the short version. I have had several supportcase at Microsoft, I think in two yeas time. We have done RAP as a Service, and no big issue. I have reinstalled the MP just some Days ago.
I started with slow App-V 4 user centric deployment (hours). No I have an case at Microsoft support about Enable Win32_QuickFixEngineering class in the Client Setting hardware Inventory dont get enable at client side.
If I do policy reset I think it take long time 15-30 minuters to all actions show up again.
So I try to understand MP and policy, I have an feeling that something is not right but what?
/SaiTech

I have an Apple Configurator install that wont recognize an iPad when I attach it via USB. I cant prepare it or refresh it. It was supervised. I get an error message that says "policy does not have correct profile data". Please help!!!

I have an Apple Configurator install that wont recognize an iPad when I attach it via USB. I cant prepare it or refresh it. It was supervised. I get an error message that says "policy does not have correct profile data". At some point there was a mismatch between the profile on the iPad and the MAC server. The profile on the MAC server has been deleted and the iPad has been erased and reset to default. I need to be able to get Configurator to recognize this device to prepare it for deployment and issue Apps to it. Please help!!

Run the application 'Terminal.app' which you will find in '/Applications/Utilities' on your Macintosh.
Type this into it: defaults delete com.apple.configurator PreprationSavedPolicyDefaultsKey
Hit the return key.
If you get no error message, it worked, and you can quit the app.

MBAM: Policy is not Enforced

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for