MBD message ordering

          Hi All,
          I have a problem with sequencing of messages redelivered to MDBs on WL8.1. I have
          looked through the solutions posted to the same problem on this newsgroup but
          they seem to have made no difference.
          1) My connection factory has MessagesMaximum=1
          2) There is only one instance of the MDB in the pool
          3) No redelivery delay has been configured.
          Does anyone have a solution ? I have attached some excerpts from my config files
          in case you want more details.
          Thanks,
          -Vikram
          [configs.txt]
          

Hi Vikram,
          I can see nothing else wrong with your configuration.
          Since you state the problem is not reproducable on
          a stand-alone client, I wonder if it has
          something to do with transactions. I suggest contacting
          customer support. In addition you might want
          to try a non-transactional MDB to speed up narrowing
          down the problem.
          Tom, BEA
          vikram wrote:
          > Hi Tom,
          >
          > Sorry for the misleading info earlier but I have actually removed that setting
          > (RedeliveryDelayOverride) and I still have the problem. One other thing that I
          > have noticed is that If I have a stand alone asynchronous MessageListener then
          > the redelivered messages are in order, the problem exists only in MDBs
          >
          > Regards
          >
          > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >>Hi Vikram,
          >>
          >>Assertion (3) is false, as there
          >>is a RedeliveryDelayOverride="20000" set
          >>in the configuration below.
          >>
          >>Tom
          >>
          >>vikram wrote:
          >>
          >>
          >>>Hi All,
          >>>
          >>>I have a problem with sequencing of messages redelivered to MDBs on
          >>
          >>WL8.1. I have
          >>
          >>>looked through the solutions posted to the same problem on this newsgroup
          >>
          >>but
          >>
          >>>they seem to have made no difference.
          >>>1) My connection factory has MessagesMaximum=1
          >>>2) There is only one instance of the MDB in the pool
          >>>3) No redelivery delay has been configured.
          >>>Does anyone have a solution ? I have attached some excerpts from my
          >>
          >>config files
          >>
          >>>in case you want more details.
          >>>
          >>>Thanks,
          >>>-Vikram
          >>>
          >>>
          >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
          >>>
          >>>
          >>>-------------------------CONFIG.XML------------------------------------------------------------
          >>> <JMSConnectionFactory JNDIName="RDWJMSConnectionFactory"
          >>> Name="RDWJMSConnectionFactory" OverrunPolicy="KeepOld"
          >>> Targets="@RDW_SERVER_NAME@" TransactionTimeout="86400" XAConnectionFactoryEnabled="true"
          >>> MessagesMaximum="1"/>
          >>>
          >>> <JMSServer Name="RDWJMSServer" Store="RDWJDBCStore" Targets="@RDW_SERVER_NAME@">
          >>> <JMSQueue DeliveryModeOverride="Persistent"
          >>> JNDIName="HighPriorityQueue" MessagesMaximum="50"
          >>> Name="HighPriorityQueue" StoreEnabled="default" RedeliveryDelayOverride="20000"/>
          >>> </JMSServer>
          >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          >>>-------------------------EJB-JAR.XML------------------------------------------------------------
          >>><?xml version="1.0"?>
          >>><!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise
          >>
          >>JavaBeans 2.0//EN' 'http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd'>
          >>
          >>><ejb-jar>
          >>> <enterprise-beans>
          >>> <message-driven>
          >>> <ejb-name>MessagePrioritiserMDBHigh</ejb-name>
          >>> <ejb-class>com.mizuho.rdw.interfaces.beans.MessagePrioritiserMDB</ejb-class>
          >>> <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
          >>> <message-driven-destination>
          >>> <destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
          >>> </message-driven-destination>
          >>> </message-driven>
          >>> </enterprise-beans>
          >>> <assembly-descriptor>
          >>> <container-transaction>
          >>> <method>
          >>> <ejb-name>MessagePrioritiserMDBHigh</ejb-name>
          >>> <method-name>*</method-name>
          >>> </method>
          >>> <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
          >>> </container-transaction>
          >>> </assembly-descriptor>
          >>></ejb-jar>
          >>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          >>>--------------------------------WEBLOGIC-EJB-JAR.XML----------------------------------------------------
          >>><?xml version="1.0"?>
          >>><!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic
          >>
          >>6.0.0 EJB//EN' 'http://www.bea.com/servers/wls600/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd'>
          >>
          >>><weblogic-ejb-jar>
          >>> <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          >>> <ejb-name>MessagePrioritiserMDBHigh</ejb-name>
          >>> <message-driven-descriptor>
          >>> <pool>
          >>> <max-beans-in-free-pool>1</max-beans-in-free-pool>
          >>> <initial-beans-in-free-pool>1</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
          >>> </pool>
          >>> <destination-jndi-name>HighPriorityQueue</destination-jndi-name>
          >>> <connection-factory-jndi-name>RDWJMSConnectionFactory</connection-factory-jndi-name>
          >>> </message-driven-descriptor>
          >>> <transaction-descriptor>
          >>> <trans-timeout-seconds>60</trans-timeout-seconds>
          >>> </transaction-descriptor>
          >>> <jndi-name>MessagePrioritiserMDBHigh</jndi-name>
          >>> </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
          >>></weblogic-ejb-jar>
          >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          >>
          >
          

Similar Messages

  • Message Ordering or Singlton Service in SOA Suite 11g

    In SOA Suite 10g, JMS Adapter could behaviors as Singleton instance by setting the properties "XclusterGroupId".
    In addition, set Routing Service to be Synchronous execution, therefore only one instance consuming the Target message queue sequentially.
    Does this properties still take effect in SOA Suite 11g, as I didn't find this properties being mentioned through Adapter Technology documentations?
    Otherwise are there any other solutions for the Message Ordering?
    Thank you in advance.
    -Simon
    Edited by: user8408910 on Jul 13, 2009 1:31 AM

    Is it the same answer for JMS topic listeners? i.e. each new message on the topic should be processed once and only once by a Composite deployed to a cluster with >1 server instances.
    Thanks for info,
    Todd

  • Message order in Papyrus sequence diagram xmi file

    Dear all,
    I would like to ask you if you could help me by explaining me how message ordering information of Papyrus sequence diagrams is represented in the corresponding xmi files.
    For each lifeline, I would assume that the order of messages is shown in the xmi file in the coveredBy attribute of the respective lifeline element.
    If yes, I have observed that the order there is not shown correctly. Adding a message seems to be always appended at the end of the messages list, instead of being inserted inbetween its neighbouring messages.
    If no, then how can I get from the xmi file the message order for a single lifeline?
    I am using just two simple lifelines exchanging messages, without any combined fragments or complex notation. My Eclipse version is Luna, and I just downloaded the Papyrus 1.1.0 version, the one that Mars uses.
    Thank you a lot in advance. Any information you could provide me regarding this issue would be extremely useful.
    Best regards,
    Alkis

    Since I haven't still got any answer, let me rephrase the question and make it more general:
    Do Papyrus sequence diagrams store message order information?
    As far as I have understood, they should, but I believe that it is a Papyrus bug that, when creating a new message, order of MessageOccurrenceSpecification fragments in XMI file is most frequently not respected. The same can be seen from the MessageOccurrenceSpecification fragments in the Model Explorer for the respective interaction in Papyrus IDE, order of them frequently seems random.
    Another thing which I strongly believe is a bug is that, when creating a new combined fragment sometimes the lifeline information of message events in the XMI file gets lost (attribute 'coveredBy' of each lifeline, and attribute 'covered' of each MessageOccurenceSpecification fragment get blank).
    In any case, I would be really grateful if someone could answer my initial question so that I know that these assumptions are correct, find a way to temporarily circumvent the problem and file a bug report about that.
    Best regards,
    Alkis

  • JMS destination key used for message ordering not working

    Hi there,
    i'm using Weblogic 10.3. I've been trying to implement ordering of messages using a destination key assigned to a JMS message queue. The default ordering is FIFO (it uses the JMSMessageID in ascending order for this).
    According to documentation (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/destination_keys/ConfigureDestinationKeys.html) one can also configure the queue to behave in a LIFO manner by creating a destination which sorts on the JMSMessageID in a descending order.
    I have tried this, it does not work. I have also played with different message priority settings and tried to sort on the JMSPriority field of the messages in ascending and descending order, it changes nothing. Messages keep being processed in a FIFO manner.
    Has anyone been able accomplish message ordering other than FIFO? Am I missing something?
    Any assistance would be highly appreciated!

    Why not try
    if (_key.keyPressed(TAB)) then
    -- DO WHATEVER CONDITION
    end if
    im not sure if that is the correct way of telling the system
    to use the TAB key but this works for RETURN when the user hits the
    enter key, so if u substitute the TAB for the command to use the
    TAB key im sure it will work
    im sorry if it doesnt tho, but its worth a try if your still
    struggling

  • About Message ordering in reliable web services..

    Hi,
    I am new to WebServices and right now I am handling the reliability of the webservice. I want to know what exactly is message ordering?
    What the receiving RMP (Reliable Message Processor) should do if I send the message with the order of sequence nos like 2,9,4,7,1, etc..?
    In which order the receiving RMP will send the messages to the WSDL , if I enabled Message Ordering in my request?
    Any help regarding this will be highly solicited..
    Reg,
    BRKP.

    Are you asking about "WS-ReliableMessaging" specifications?
    If so that is a pretty big discussion which might fill up the forum disk space.
    SOADevelopers
    http://SOADevelopers.com

  • Error message "order currently being processed" in print order thru IW37N

    Hi,
    I am getting error messages "order currently being proceesed by same user" & " material reservation for order being processed" when i am trying to take print of work order using t-code IW37N putting multiple orders. But I am able to take print then also. I am not able  to understand why this message is coming before print comes out..I have not opened any more same transaction also on the screen.
    I am getting this error message very frequently for other open orders also.
    Plse suggest what can be the reason ?
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Apart from standard shop papers selection 2010, 2020, 2030 if you define new like 3030 or 4040 and assigned with any custom program to print server system will issue this message.
    Please check the standard config via transaction OIDF
    Thanks
    S.N

  • Web services and message ordering

    i am a newbie to Rest services and camel. please help me. message(xml)will be sent from services at endpoint 1 to services exposed @ endpoint 2. i am not going to use queue or anything in between. but i want message ordering for few instances. so how is it possible. is there any option available. thanks

    thanks for the response.
    I dont wait for response 1 before sending request 2 and thats why am asking qn on how to preserve order. communication is not synchronous. i send multiple messages to different threads and i will not know the order across the whole message stream as each thread will process messages concurrently.
    For example i will be sending message 1 and message 2 which should go in order. For some reason if message 2 goes before message 1 my whole requirement will fail. if i use queue in between i can preserve the order but am not going to use queue. so is there anything i can do to ensure that message 1 goes before message 2?

  • Online / offline, read/ unread status, message order

    Kind of exhausting dealing with the UTTER JUNK skype software on a daily basis. As I sit now with my Mac and iPhone Skype in front of me, talking to the same person: * One of these devices says the person is online, the other says they are offline. * Message order is different between the different devices. * My iPhone is missing the last several messages sent for an hour now, even though I reboot, reconnect etc. * Unlike things like FB messenger, you can't tell for sure when they read the message. * Messages got stuck in the system for hours today (leading me to great personal strife). Why oh why do we use this junk when FB messanger has so far lifted the bar of good design, reliability and user interface over Skype which seems stuck in the 1990s, Skype can't release anything that isn't full of bugs, they don't release even basic new features, and it hasn't even been as reliable as it used to be 5 years ago for a long time. Just junk, that's all.

    Hi, Don't wanna use the GMail app (don't like it really).Besides, this used to work perfect before the update, so it's clearly a bug. On other issue I found:When deleting a message which is open (using the trash can symbol at the top), sometimes the mail reappears when the app goes back to the inbox.When deleting using a swipe action, this never seems to happen.

  • JMS Message ordering

    What does the JMS specification (in J2EE version 1.3) say about queues having to support message ordering for messages of the same priority?
    Is this a requirement or not....?
    Thanks for your help.
    Brent Miller
    Chicago, IL

    Hi,
    About the order of message receipt, JMS1.1 specs say that Messages consumed by a session define a serial order. JMS defines that messages sent by a session to a destination must be received in the order in which they were sent. However, JMS does not define order of message receipt across destinations or across a destination's messages sent from multiple sessions.
    However, an important point to note here is that several things can affect this order:
    1) Messages of higher priority may be received before previous lower priority messages sent.
    2) A client may not receive a NON_PERSISTENT messages due to a JMS provider failure.
    3) If both PERSISTENT and NON_PERSISTENT messages are sent to a destination, order is only guaranteed within delivery mode i.e. a later NON_PERSISTENT message may be received before an earlier PERSISTENT message. However, it will definitely arrive ahead of an earlier NON_PERSISTENT message with the same priority.
    Manish

  • Inbound IDoc w/message ORDERS - issues with error processing

    We are using inbound IDoc ORDERS05 with message type ORDERS to create the sales orders in SAP. In WE20 we have the following settings:
    - partner type LS (= Sales Org VKORG)
    - process code ORDE
    - trigger by background program
    - post-processing agent of type US (user) with a user ID.
    We create IDocs through an ABAP program and use RBDAPP01 to post the IDocs. When there is an application error in the IDoc posting we expect the designated user to receive a workflow item in the SAP Inbox, but for some reason this is not happening.
    I did some research and went through all the possible settings for workflow, task, etc. and everything seems to be set up correctly. When debugging RBDAPP01 I have noticed that it calls FM APPLICATION_IDOC_POST_IMMEDIAT, which, in turn, calls IDOC_START_INBOUND. If IDOC_START_INBOUND returns SY-SUBRC = 1 then the workflow item is sent correctly to the designated user, exactly as we want. But for some reason it returns 0 (I changed it to 1 in the debugger).
    It seems that IDOC_START_INBOUND reads TEDE2 records (TEVE2-EVCODE = ORDE) and sy-subrc = 1 is only possible when EDIVR2 is 1,2,3 or 4. In our case TEDE2-EDIVR2 = 6. It seems that TEDE2 is maintained in the transaction WE42. However, I tried to change the settings there but it affects the IDoc processing in whole (IDoc gets some odd status and doesn't get processed as before). I've also tried to use process code ORDE_BY_WORKFLOW in WE20 with the same "success".
    What do we need to do to get a workflow item for the errors that happen in the application layer when IDoc is posted? Is it even possible with this message type?
    Any ideas would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Can you please share how do you overcome the problem, so that it can be helpful for others.

  • Archiving error message - order linked to old investiment program

    During CO-Order object archiving, error message saying that order is linked to investment program. Check it is an 2001 old investment program. Tried, but could not settle balance/order. Is there any CO flag to allow access to 2001 investment program?
    Thanks.

    During CO-Order object archiving, error message saying that order is linked to investment program. Check it is an 2001 old investment program. Tried, but could not settle balance/order. Is there any CO flag to allow access to 2001 investment program?
    Thanks.

  • JDBC Adapter message order

    Hello experts,
    I want to ask one question.
    If I use JDBC adapter for processing outgoing message (receiver JDBC adapter) - Is processing of message guaranteed in order how I received it on sender side or processing order can change and I will insert messages in changed order.
    Example:
    I have messages 1 and 2 which comes at sender side in this order.
    Is it guaranteed, that on receiver side, they will be inserted in DB in order 1, 2 or is it possible that I will find them in DB in order 2, 1.
    I hope that I wrote it clear.
    Thank you
    VB

    Hi Vladimir
    if you use EO quality of service then you will get messages in any order.
    if you use EOIO, then you will get ordered messages at receiver side. To use EOIO QoS set "Maintain Order at Runtime" checkbox in interface determination object of your scenario.
    regards, Mikhail

  • Message Ordering with Message Listeners

              We have three Message Listeners listeners listening to JMS Queue
              for processing messages sent to the queue. Let us assume the listeners as L1,L2
              and L3. And lets says there are three
              messages that have been submitted to the queue in the order M1,M2 and M3. M1 goes
              to L1,M2 to L2 and M3 to L3. Everything is fine. When L2 finishes processing M2
              faster than the other two listeners, M4 which is submitted later does not get
              processed
              by L2. Instead it gets processed by L1. This is a very bizarre
              behaviour as it does not utilize the available lsitener L2.
              Is there any configuration setting which can change this behaviour??Or is this
              a Weblogic 7.0 Bug. Any help on this greatly appreciated.
              Thanx,
              Sankas
              

              Zach,
              Thanx a lot for your response. I have been trying to crack this
              for the past few days and does not seem to work. I have tried your suggestion
              of 3listeners and 6 messages. It did not do the trick. I even tried 10 messages.
              Still messages 1,4 and 7 go to the first listener even though it is not ready
              to process them.
              And thanx for the neat explaination on the MessagesMaximum thing. Actually I tried
              setting to 0 and the server does not start up properly.
              To me this issue seems to be pretty big. At least from our
              implementation point of view as the messages are not delivered
              to the available listener. Is'nt there a workaround for this??
              By telling the server that it does not want to be send any more incoming messages.
              I have tried all sorts of closes and stops on the connection and session objects.
              None of them work as the spec says they wait until the Message Listener returns
              and by
              the time it returns messages are already cached on the listener.
              So I would greatly appreciate if BEA can come up with a workaround for this
              as it is very crucial for our deployment. I am little bit surprised if this issue
              hasn't come up before.
              Thanx,
              Sankas
              "Zach" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >When you set the value to 1, there is one message in-flight at all times.
              >That is your listener has 1 message and 1 is on the way. If you have
              >3
              >listeners and send 4 messages then you will still see the behavior you
              >describe. Try sending at least 6 messages for your 3 listeners.
              >
              >In the next release we have modified this to allow you to set the value
              >to
              >zero. No messages are pre-delivered/in-flight.
              >
              >_sjz.
              >
              >"Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              >news:[email protected]...
              >>
              >> Shean,
              >> I tried making the MessagesMaximum=1 change you suggested and
              >> it does not seem to do what you have said. Is there anything
              >> else that need to be changed?If you want to look at my listener
              >> code I can email it to you.
              >> Thanx,
              >> samkas
              >>
              >> "Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >> >
              >> >Shean,
              >> > Thanx a lot for your prompt reply. I will try the
              >> >configuration change of MessagesMaximum=1. Also is it possible
              >> >if I close the session of the message listener once I receive a
              >> >message. And open it once the listener is ready to process the
              >> >next message.
              >> >
              >> >Thanx,
              >> >Sankas
              >> >
              >> >
              >> >"Shean-Guang Chang" <[email protected]> wrote:
              >> >>For async consumer WLS JMS can buildup a message pipeline for each
              >consumer,
              >> >>which is tunable on the connection factory (MessagesMaximum).
              >> >>In your case you should set the message pipeline to 1 then L2 will
              >get
              >> >>M4.
              >> >>The pipeline is used to speedup message delivery to async consumer
              >and
              >> >>WLS
              >> >>JMS will try to fill up each async consumer's pipeline in round-robin.
              >> >>Thanks!
              >> >>
              >> >>"Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              >> >>news:[email protected]...
              >> >>>
              >> >>> We have three Message Listeners listeners listening to JMS Queue
              >> >>> for processing messages sent to the queue. Let us assume the
              >listeners
              >> >>as
              >> >>L1,L2
              >> >>> and L3. And lets says there are three
              >> >>> messages that have been submitted to the queue in the order M1,M2
              >> >and
              >> >>M3.
              >> >>M1 goes
              >> >>> to L1,M2 to L2 and M3 to L3. Everything is fine. When L2 finishes
              >> >>processing M2
              >> >>> faster than the other two listeners, M4 which is submitted later
              >does
              >> >>not
              >> >>get
              >> >>> processed
              >> >>> by L2. Instead it gets processed by L1. This is a very bizarre
              >> >>> behaviour as it does not utilize the available lsitener L2.
              >> >>> Is there any configuration setting which can change this
              >behaviour??Or
              >> >>is this
              >> >>> a Weblogic 7.0 Bug. Any help on this greatly appreciated.
              >> >>> Thanx,
              >> >>> Sankas
              >> >>
              >> >>
              >> >
              >>
              >
              >
              

  • AQ Message Order

    I understand msgid is not guaranteed to be in order.
    1. Is there any way to determine the enqueue order of a set of messages? Enqtime is only to the second.
    2. If using a queuebrowser starting at a message ID, will messages appear in actual order even if msgids are not in order?
    Thanks,
    Eric

    Answers from Oracle for anyone interested:
    1. Is there any way to determine the enqueue order of a set of messages?
    Enqtime is only to the second.
    (**) Yes the enqueue order is enqtime + step_no. So if you concat it appropriately you will get the right >order.
    2. If using a queuebrowser starting at a message ID, will messages appear in
    actual order even if msgids are not in order?
    (**) The message will appear in the enqueue time order.
    3. Is there any way, preferably a sql query, to determine the messageID of
    the last message enqueued to an AQ?
    You could write a query which would compute the max(enqueue_time + step_no) say something like:
    select msgid from queue_table where expr(enqtime, stepno) = (select max(expr(enqtime, stepno)) from >queue_table); This is true but Oracle forgot to say that the order is guaranted only if the messages are enqueued in the same session!! if the messages are enqueued by different sessions the result is unpredictable (the enqueue time is OK but the step_no is completly wrong, that is we can have different message at the same time with the same step_no)

  • 2 AIM Bugs (crlf & message order)

    Phone: Curve 8300
    OS: 4.5.0.52 (Platform 2.7.0.66)
    AIM: 2.1.37
    I've noticed 2 bugs in the AIM software.
    The client does not support multi-line messages.  So single messages like the following...
    line 1
    line 2
    line 3
    appear as...
    line 1line 2line 3
    Also, messages received by the client at the same time often display out of order.
    These two bugs have been giving me problems when communicating with AIM bots.  I haven't seen these bugs in the other AIM clients for the bb.
    For now I have switched to using instango as an alternative, but I would prefer to use the RIM software whenever possible.

    Hi,
    The AIM is in the 2821 router running 12.4 AES T train IOS.
    CUE will allow me to installed the zero ivr port package but not the 2 or 4 port.
    CUE config :
    se-10-2-1-2# show software packages
    Installed Packages:
    - Installer (Installer application) (7.0.2.0)
    - Thirdparty (Service Engine Thirdparty Code) (7.0.2)
    - Bootloader (Primary) (Service Engine Bootloader) (2.1.14)
    - Infrastructure (Service Engine Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
    - Global (Global manifest) (7.0.2)
    - Service Engine license (License for the Service Engine) (2.1.2.0)
    - Auto Attendant (Service Engine Telephony Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
    - Voice Mail (Voicemail application) (7.0.2)
    - Bootloader (Secondary) (Service Engine Bootloader) (2.1.14.0)
    - Core (Service Engine OS Core) (7.0.2)
    - GPL Infrastructure (Service Engine GPL Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
    Installed Plug-ins:
    - CUE Voicemail Language Support (Languages global pack) (7.0.2)
    - CUE Voicemail US English (English language pack) (7.0.2)
    se-10-2-1-2# show software licenses
    Installed license files:
    - voicemail_lic.sig : 25 MAILBOX LICENSE
    Core:
    - Application mode: CCM
    - Total usable system ports: 6
    Voicemail/Auto Attendant:
    - Max system mailbox capacity time: 840
    - Default # of general delivery mailboxes: 10
    - Default # of personal mailboxes: 25
    - Max # of configurable mailboxes: 35
    Interactive Voice Response:
    - Max # of IVR sessions: Not Available
    Languages:
    - Max installed languages: 2
    - Max enabled languages: 2

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to set a display variable

    Hi all, we have oracle EBS 12.1.1 installed on suse linux servers in our setup. one developer is using dev tools to have some graphs displayed while generating reports. all of a sudden we find that the graphs are not getting generated. i am told that

  • Changes to Skype Premium for existing users

    I'm confused about what my former Skype Premium package now includes following an email from Skype. I had noticed that from 1st May I was no longer getting free calls to Canada as was previously the case but the latest communication from Skype isn't

  • Convert swf to video

    Once, I find a very cooling flash on web, I want to put it on my iPhone, but as you know, iPhone can only play iphone movie, then I search on line to fine a program that can convert swf to iphone, and I found Moyea swf to video converter. Actually, t

  • Can I run logmnr without setting  SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN ??

    Question is can I run logmnr without setting SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN ?? I had a situation where I had to run log miner to undo some changes. I ran the log miner on the database where SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN was not set nor the dictionary was spec

  • E2E Workload: No data/graphic is available

    Hi! I have succcessfully set up SMD. Unfortunately I can see any data under the E2E Workload tabs. The job E2E_EXTRACTOR_CONTROLLER runs and retrieves the data for the solution. Has some one exprerience how to proceed? P.S. I have SAP Solution Manage