Mbp core 2 duo, no display after applying 10.7.5 update

My wife just did an update from 10.7.4 to 10.7.5 and after reboot the display would not come up. I can screen share to the MBP but I can not get the local display to work. Tried doing a NVRAM reset no luck. Connected external monitor, also no display. It's like the graphics card is dead but no error messages?
Replace the hard disk with an older Leopard Installation and machine boots but again no display.
Any idea on how I can get the display up again.

Hi Mende1,
The graphics card was working fine just before the 10.7.5 update. No sign of any problems? It's very coincidental that the graphics card would stop working just after an OSb update!

Similar Messages

MBP Core 2 Duo First Impressions

I had the opportunity to test (rough empirical) a Quad G5 2.5 G5 w/6600 cart horse 4Gb RAM 1Tb RAID0 vs MBP Core 2 Duo 2.33 2Gb RAM 120Gb 5400rpm HDD.
Loaded the same projects onto both machines ... 1 x 518 images and 1 x 296 images. worked on the 518 image project. Previews off.
Full Screen mode. 1st column MBP, 2nd column Quad
Straighten: more control v. less control
Dust (52 spots): faster v. slower (marginally but noticeably)
Straighten: slower, controllable after first movement v. hesitant/jerky
Levels: 1.5-2s v. 3.5-4s
White Bal: 1.5s slider, further 1.5s render v. 2.5s, further 2.5s render
Exposure: 2.5s slider, further 2.5s render v. 6.5s slider, 5s render
Straighten: 3s v. 4s
Double click straighten degrees for data entry (Test 1): 6s v. 11.5s
Double click straighten degrees for data entry (Test 2): 5s v. 12s
Straighten (accept data entry): 2s v 3.5s
Crop: Relatively responsive v More sluggish but relatively responsive
Recrop (render): 2s v. 4s
Straighten cropped image (Test 1 small change): 2.5s v. 6s
Straighten cropped image (Test 2 big change): 4.5s v. 58s
Straighten cropped image (Test 3 big change): 5s v. 27s
Straighten cropped image (Test 4 moderate change): 6s v. 7s
Straighten cropped image (Test 5 small change): 5.5s v. 8s
Straighten cropped image (Test 6 small change): 6s v. Gave up after >1min
Generate Previews 1min: 7 images vs. 14 images
Generate Previews 2min: 15 images vs. 22 images
Generate Previews 3min: 21 images vs. 31 images
Export 13 full size JPG's: 1.05m v. 1m
Rough and ready conclusions:
- The 6600 graphics card is a dog wrt Aperture (duh!)
- The MBP Core2 Duo is roughly 2x faster on image adjustments
- The faster drives of the Quad and 2x CPU's showed its power in generating previews and writing to disk
- Given notes from Aperture users with 7800GT video, I suspect the MBP Core2Duo would be as fast or maybe faster. I'd love to hear from somebody who can verify
- Even allowing for the slower disk sub-system, the MBP Core2Duo is more than the equivalent of a portable Quad!!! Now ain't that something!

Yeehaaa!
Score one for the G5!!!!!
OK, updated the Quad with the X1900 G5 and consigned the 6600 to the toy box.
So, how does it perform?
Loaded the same projects onto both machines ... 1 project x 518 images and 1 project x 296 images. Worked on the 518 image project. Previews off.
Full Screen mode.
1st column MBP, 2nd column Quad w/6600, 3rd column Quad w/X1900
(When Real-Time noted, there is a fractional lag, but insufficient to compromise adjusting to any desired value WITHOUT resorting to the <Option> key.
Levels: 1.5-2s v. 3.5-4s v. Real-Time
White Bal Slider: 1.5s v. 2.5s v. Real-Time
Exposure: 2.5s slider v. 6.5s slider v. Real-Time
Perform Straighten (after releasing mouse): 3s v. 4s v. 2-2.5s
Double click straighten degrees for data entry (Test 1): 6s v. 11.5s v. 2.5s
Straighten (accept data entry): 2s v 3.5s v 0.5s
Crop: Relatively responsive v. More sluggish v. Responsive
Recrop (render): 2s v. 4s v. 0.5s
Straighten cropped image render (Test 1 small change): 2.5s v. 6s v. 1.5s
Straighten cropped image render (Test 2 big change): 4.5s v. 58s (NOT A TYPO) v. 2s
Straighten cropped image render (Test 4 moderate change): 6s v. 7s v. 1.5s
Straighten cropped image render (Test 5 small change): 5.5s v. 8s v. 1.5s
Generate Previews 1min: 7 images v. 14 images v.16 images
Generate Previews 2min: 15 images v. 22 images v. 34 images
Generate Previews 3min: 21 images v. 31 images v. 48 images
Rough and ready conclusions:
- The Quad w/6600 graphics card is a dog wrt Aperture (duh!)
- The MBP Core2 Duo is roughly 2x faster on image adjustments (Quad/6600)
- The Quad w/X1900 outpaces the MBP Core2Duo by over 2x
- The Quad w/X1900 is day and night vs. Quad/6600 ( > 400%!!!!!!!! )
Santa came early!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:-O
G.

Fans running too fast on MBP Core II Duo

Hi there,
I'm starting a new post 'cause the older one was getting unfruitful. Let me wrap up quickly. I've got both a MBP Core Duo and a MBP Core II Duo. I had notice that the fans on my MBP Core II Duo were very noisy compared to the MBP Core Duo. So I ran smcFanControl (NO I HAVEN'T CHANGED THE SETTINGS AND NO smcFanControl ISN'T BAD FOR YOUR COMPUTER), I just used it for MONITORING PURPOSES. Ok.
I've capture both results in movies so you can see the differences. I've used a cloned system and compiled some code to give the cpu some meat. Here are some behaviors I've noticed:
http://web.mac.com/michaf/iWeb/MacBook%20Pro%20Fans/MacBook%20Pro%20Fans.html
(Just run both movies at the same time)
1) The MBP Core II Duo runs at a minimum of 2000 rpm vs 1000 for the MBP Core Duo
2) The MBO Core II Duo shoots very quickly and hangs it's fans much higher.
3) After a while the MBP Core II Duo has a temp of around 68 with fans running at 4500! The Core Duo instead at a similar temp is down to 2300!
I'm recording with my machines and it's barely usable with the fans.
Has anyone noticed the same thing or is it my machine?
Micha

The movies in your link don't appear to be working so can't comment on those.
Your post confirms what I suspect is true about C2D temps compared to CD temps, which is that the C2D is fundamentally no cooler (possibly hotter) than the CD, but Apple have doubled the fan speed in the C2D to make the C2D run cooler.
Seems to me that Apple bent over backwards to make the CD quiet, and this resulted in them running too hot, and with the C2D they have swung the other way.
I am using Fan Control 1.1 on my CD to steer a middle course. I have left it with 1000 rpm min but set it to start ramping the fan speed earlier and more steeply as temp rises. So most of the time it is quiet, and high temps which can be reached with the Apple settings are avoided.
Doesn't help your C2D problem much except to suggest that you use Fan Control 1.1 to devise settings to suit your purposes. I suggest you have Hardware Monitor on continuously (hidden) so that you see what has happened to the temp over typical working sessions using different settings in Fan Control. When you have found what works you don't need to keep Hardware Monitor active.
C2D can't need 2000 rpm the whole time!
Mike

13" MBP Core 2 Duo version

Where can I still buy a 13" MBP Core 2 Duo version?
I have read to many reviews and blog posts about heat issues in the i5 version for 13" mbps. I have a core 2 duo from 2010 and i love the quiet operation. Now I am in the market to get one for the wife.
Any pointers where I can still buy a core 2 duo version for the regular retail price?
Thanks.

Thanks for the response. I am aware of the refurb link. Was hoping to get a brand new version of it. The ones which are being sold on Amazon are selling at a premium which is not justified (especially for an older model).
Any other pointers/websites which could have them in stock?
Thanks again.

I bought my imac in 2007 2.4 ghz core 2 duo. Can I get 10.8 software update on it or do I need a new imac? thanks

I bought my imac in 2007 2.4 ghz core 2 duo. Can I get 10.8 software update on it or do I need a new imac? thanks

Visit > Apple - Upgrade your Mac to OS X Mountain Lion.

HT1338 i have macbook air 13.3 1.6 ghz intel core 2 duo and 10.5.8. how can i update 10.6

i have macbook air 13.3 1.6 ghz intel core 2 duo and 10.5.8. how can i update 10.6 pls help me

ok but i have mac os x.
I'll explain the numbering system for you.
With the operating systems numbering format it works as this: for example with 10.5.8, the first number is redundant because they are all 10 since 2001. This is the X in OS X
The second number is the upgrade version, which have cat names attached to them. 10.5 is Leopard. Each of these upgrade names must be purchased. If you want 10.6 (Snow Leopard) you need to buy it,
The last number is the update version, which is free, but requires the upgrade before you can install it.
So, you currently have Mac OS X 10.5.8 and you ask how to upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, and I have given you the link of how buy it.
so do i must change mac os x (10.5) to snow-leopard.
The choice is yours. You do not have to upgrade if you do not wish to.

Windows could not search for new updates after applied June 2014 Windows Updates - Error code 80244004

After applied June 2014 Windows Updates from Microsoft (Not using WSUS server to obtain WU), our Windows Server 2012 R2 and Windows Server 2008 now getting this error message when we perform the "Check for Updates":
Windows could not search for new updates. Error code 80244004.
Richard

Hi Richard,
Just addition, please refer to following KB to reset Windows Update components and monitor the result.
How do I reset Windows Update components?
If didn’t use ESET security software, please also refer to following thread and check if can help you.
Latest
version of Windows Update causing error 80244004
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

MBP Core 2 Duo vs iMac Core Duo

I am pondering upgrading my laptop (1.5GHz G4 Powerbook) to a new Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro (2.33GHz, 2GB RAM, 256MB Video). I know that the performance upgrade here is going to be significant.
However, 1 year ago I bought a 20" iMac with the Core Duo processor in it (2GHz, 2GB Ram, 256MB Video) which I use for Aperture and World of Warcraft.
Am I going to see a noticeable difference in performance between the iMac and the Macbook Pro? If so, I'll just sell the iMac and buy an external display for the laptop.
Thanks
Chris

The previous poster is correct. Because the iMac will be using desktop components, despite the increased processor speed of the MBP, apps like WoW will probably still run better on the iMac. However, as you can see from my Macintosh Computer profile, I have an earlier model 2.0 GHz MBP and I can tell you that even without 2GB of ram, which I have, it runs amazing. The 2 GB of ram just puts it over the top. And if you're still not satisfied with the frame rate, just run boot camp and install WoW on there. If I remember correctly, it'll run about 6 frames per second faster. In spite of this, I don't really like running windows, so I run WoW on Tiger anyways. And to be honest, it looks equally as good as my friend running wow on his gaming laptop. I don't even use an external display, so that'll be like the cherry on top. I guess all I'm saying is keep the iMac if you want, but I think you'd be equally satisfied and perhaps save some money if you used the MBP alone--with or without an external display.
I have never used aperture so I can't comment on that, sorry.
At any rate, Good luck with your decision

MBP core 2 duo MBP outpunching dual Quad Xeon MacPro/ATI Radeon HD4870-why?

Specifically, on the Mac Pro, in a Pro Res 422 HQ timeline, FCP generated text requires rendering in safe mode with a red bar and in unlimited RT (dynamic frame rate/quality) is showing as an orange render. On my old MBP, text plays back fine in safe mode, with a light green preview bar. Any ideas?
system details below:
MBP
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro2,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.33 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 4 MB
Memory: 3 GB
Bus Speed: 667 MHz
ATI Radeon X1600:
Chipset Model: ATY,RadeonX1600
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 256 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x71c5
Revision ID: 0x0000
ROM Revision: 113-xxxxxx-158
EFI Driver Version: 01.00.158
Displays:
Color LCD:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Built-In: Yes
Cinema HD:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Rotation: Supported
MacPro
Hardware Overview:
Model Name: Mac Pro
Model Identifier: MacPro4,1
Processor Name: Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 2.93 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Total Number Of Cores: 8
L2 Cache (per core): 256 KB
L3 Cache (per processor): 8 MB
Memory: 12 GB
Processor Interconnect Speed: 6.4 GT/s
Boot ROM Version: MP41.0081.B07
SMC Version (system): 1.39f5
SMC Version (processor tray): 1.39f5
Serial Number (system): CK93607720H
Serial Number (processor tray): J593101341LUE
Hardware UUID: EADC4ED0-49BF-5086-8B85-946B76A1E1BB
ATI Radeon HD 4870:
Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 4870
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
Slot: Slot-1
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 512 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
Device ID: 0x9440
Revision ID: 0x0000
ROM Revision: 113-B7710F-176
EFI Driver Version: 01.00.318
Displays:
Cinema HD:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Rotation: Supported
Display Connector:
Status: No Display Connected

Just a guess but it may be a buried preference setting somewhere.
Use a preference manager to save current configurations, (re)save the project, trash the preferences on both and open the same project on both machines.
Let us know what happens.

Reliability on the MBP (Core 2 Duo) -- freeze wise

I'm currently using the last generation PB, but already sick and tired of the constant freeze issue, and seems like there's no solution to fix and there're more and more users experiencing the problem (check PB AL forum postings)
I think it's about time for an upgrade...
I would like to ask anyone who's using the Core 2 DUO MBP, did this problem go away when the book switched to Intel? Any freeze during idle, or from wake up etc? How would you rate it in terms of reliability?
Thanks for your comment

I don't care if the thread is 100 pages long. You won't find me on such a thread. The only way you can really get a solution is if someone is able to focus on your situation individually. You start getting 100 people trying to solve 200 problems together, and nothing ever gets done, and you just have a rant fest filled with threadjacking. See what Terms of Use says about threadjacking, rants, and trolling. It is more a problem to try to sort out the mess of that, than try to isolate the problems people are actually solving on the thread. Tell everyone on that thread to start a new topic that has a less obvious cause for others to threadjack, and more obvious cause to isolate their problem alone if they really want a solution.
CHUD's documentation is rather sparse as to how to get a common mortal to use it, and therefore I don't touch it. There are some features of it, I wouldn't run myself because they sound like they could cause more damage than good unless you know exactly what you are doing.
If you feel you have a power management or processor issue based on Apple's hardware test CD/Restore disk Startup Manager boot that came with your machine, take it in to AppleCare to have the machine repaired.
If you have an undetectable issue that appears even after an erase and install, it probably is the RAM that is improperly seated or has gone bad, or a logicboard issue that the test does not find.
Hardware test is documented here and how to run it for a MacBook Pro:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303081
And for most Powerbook G4s is here:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=86287
An Archive and Install of an older system on a newer system does not necessarily work, and you may find that causes more freezes. That's because it attempts to install older versions of applications on top of newer ones, and may not always succeed, and you could be left with applications meant for a newer system mixed in with your older system that simply don't work.
Cache programs like Onyx, Macaroni, Applejack, Tiger Cache Cleaner, etc... can cause freezes if they attempt to clear caches when the machine is writing them because the cache files get corrupted. An Archive and Install won't clean up that mess.
So is your data backed up at least twice and do you want to try to isolate your issue? Or have I given you enough information for you to get started on your own?

"Aperture (3.2) cannot be opened because of a problem." on MBP Core 2 Duo, 10.7.2

I recently upgraded to 3.2 from the App Store and was able to run the program until today. I am now completely unable to open it. I have tried the standard troubleshooting, including moving the application support files to the desktop, deleting the com.apple.aperture preference file, opening while holding CMD and option, and reinstalling. I have also tried moving my Aperture Library to start the program fresh. Nothing has worked; the same "cannot be opened" error persists.
I have read about other users having issues with the program constantly crashing, but that specific problem appears limited to Intel Core Duo processors, while mine is an Intel Core 2 Duo running on a MBP 3,1. I am starting this thread to find out if any with similar specs have had the same issue and known how to resolve it. Thank you in advance for your help!
For any who understand error reports, here it is:
Process:         Aperture [3286]
Path:            /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/MacOS/Aperture
Identifier:      com.apple.Aperture
Version:         3.2 (3.2)
Build Info:      Aperture-201088000000000~1
App Item ID:     408981426
App External ID: 4372644
Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [158]
Date/Time:       2011-10-25 08:13:23.285 -0600
OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.7.2 (11C74)
Report Version: 9
Interval Since Last Report:          151592 sec
Crashes Since Last Report:           16
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 1263 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   15
Anonymous UUID:                      F8A6AE56-E17C-4836-A475-FBC72F4C6A5D
Crashed Thread: 0
Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Application Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries
Dyld Error Message:
Library not loaded: /Library/Frameworks/PluginManager.framework/Versions/B/PluginManager
Referenced from: /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/MacOS/Aperture
Reason: no suitable image found. Did find:
          /Library/Frameworks/PluginManager.framework/Versions/B/PluginManager: no matching architecture in universal wrapper
Binary Images:
       0x100000000 -        0x10078bfff com.apple.Aperture (3.2 - 3.2) <0FC0DA68-CE13-3BCF-A2AE-700EA0C524CA> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/MacOS/Aperture
       0x100975000 -        0x100975fff +GlimsLoaderMinimal.dylib (??? - ???) <3BAA9682-DD18-8442-D38A-7160FC8F7EAE> /Library/Frameworks/GlimsAdditions.framework/Library/GlimsLoaderMinimal.dylib
       0x100978000 -        0x100e26fe7 com.apple.RedRock (1.8.1 - 231.89) <794D7315-0A6F-351C-B77A-D4E50D50DE26> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/Frameworks/RedRock.framework/Versions/A/Red Rock
       0x101097000 -        0x10109aff7 com.apple.iLifePhotoStreamConfiguration (2.2 - 2.2) <536AF147-2FB0-3EAF-AB65-F83E8EC63936> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/Frameworks/iLifePhotoStreamConfiguration.fr amework/Versions/A/iLifePhotoStreamConfiguration
       0x1010a0000 -        0x1010b0fff com.apple.iLifeAssetManagement (2.0 - 2.33) <4796FD8D-8F37-3F9D-B989-23E21D5B2487> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/Frameworks/iLifeAssetManagement.framework/V ersions/A/iLifeAssetManagement
       0x1010c2000 -        0x101170ff7 com.apple.MobileMe (11 - 1.0.3) <50A10074-AB15-39EE-952B-30D6E5CEB395> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/Frameworks/MobileMe.framework/Versions/A/Mo bileMe
       0x200000000 -        0x20000aff7 com.apple.iphoto.AccountConfigurationPlugin (1.2 - 1.2) <5ADCB983-167A-3DD4-BA21-0C81E9FAFA07> /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/Frameworks/AccountConfigurationPlugin.frame work/Versions/A/AccountConfigurationPlugin
    0x7fff62520000 -     0x7fff62554ac7 dyld (195.5 - ???) <4A6E2B28-C7A2-3528-ADB7-4076B9836041> /usr/lib/dyld
    0x7fff8b2db000 -     0x7fff8b2e1fff com.apple.DiskArbitration (2.4.1 - 2.4.1) <CEA34337-63DE-302E-81AA-10D717E1F699> /System/Library/Frameworks/DiskArbitration.framework/Versions/A/DiskArbitration
    0x7fff8c5ab000 -     0x7fff8c63dff7 com.apple.PDFKit (2.6.1 - 2.6.1) <33A0A777-8CF4-3F36-BB1A-78F8A3D7E8C2> /System/Library/Frameworks/Quartz.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/PDFKit.framew ork/Versions/A/PDFKit
    0x7fff8c6f1000 -     0x7fff8c8f3fff com.apple.AOSKit (1.01 - 87) <E00ACA45-14A4-3894-9001-DDD39667B107> /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/AOSKit.framework/Versions/A/AOSKit
    0x7fff8d218000 -     0x7fff8d218fff com.apple.Cocoa (6.6 - ???) <021D4214-9C23-3CD8-AFB2-F331697A4508> /System/Library/Frameworks/Cocoa.framework/Versions/A/Cocoa
    0x7fff8e368000 -     0x7fff8e53cfff com.apple.CoreFoundation (6.7.1 - 635.15) <FE4A86C2-3599-3CF8-AD1A-822F1FEA820F> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation
    0x7fff8ecd5000 -     0x7fff8ecd5fff com.apple.ApplicationServices (41 - 41) <03F3FA8F-8D2A-3AB6-A8E3-40B001116339> /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Application Services
    0x7fff8faa0000 -     0x7fff8fc2aff7 com.apple.WebKit (7534.51 - 7534.51.22) <A52AF4EF-A2AA-3718-AB96-576A5E0A1CB8> /System/Library/Frameworks/WebKit.framework/Versions/A/WebKit
    0x7fff8fd48000 -     0x7fff90020ff7 com.apple.security (7.0 - 55010) <93713FF4-FE86-3B4C-8150-5FCC7F3320C8> /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Versions/A/Security
    0x7fff90021000 -     0x7fff90030ff7 com.apple.opengl (1.7.5 - 1.7.5) <2945F1A6-910C-3596-9988-5701B04BD821> /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/OpenGL
    0x7fff90ca3000 -     0x7fff90ca3fff com.apple.Carbon (153 - 153) <895C2BF2-1666-3A59-A669-311B1F4F368B> /System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Carbon
    0x7fff91990000 -     0x7fff919dbff7 com.apple.SystemConfiguration (1.11.1 - 1.11) <F832FE21-5509-37C6-B1F1-48928F31BE45> /System/Library/Frameworks/SystemConfiguration.framework/Versions/A/SystemConfi guration
    0x7fff9232d000 -     0x7fff92397fff com.apple.framework.IOKit (2.0 - ???) <87D55F1D-CDB5-3D13-A5F9-98EA4E22F8EE> /System/Library/Frameworks/IOKit.framework/Versions/A/IOKit
    0x7fff927bc000 -     0x7fff927bcfff com.apple.CoreServices (53 - 53) <043C8026-8EDD-3241-B090-F589E24062EF> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/CoreServices
    0x7fff930c4000 -     0x7fff93263fff com.apple.QuartzCore (1.7 - 270.0) <E8FC9AA4-A5CB-384B-AD29-7190A1387D3E> /System/Library/Frameworks/QuartzCore.framework/Versions/A/QuartzCore
    0x7fff93a6b000 -     0x7fff93a6bfff com.apple.Accelerate (1.7 - Accelerate 1.7) <82DDF6F5-FBC3-323D-B71D-CF7ABC5CF568> /System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Accelerate
Model: MacBookPro3,1, BootROM MBP31.0070.B07, 2 processors, Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.2 GHz, 4 GB, SMC 1.16f11
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT, GeForce 8600M GT, PCIe, 128 MB
Memory Module: BANK 0/DIMM0, 2 GB, DDR2 SDRAM, 667 MHz, 0x7F7F7F7F7FF70000, 0x4F5743353343344444523253324742000000
Memory Module: BANK 1/DIMM1, 2 GB, DDR2 SDRAM, 667 MHz, 0x7F7F7F7F7FF70000, 0x4F5743353343344444523253324742000000
AirPort: spairport_wireless_card_type_airport_extreme (0x168C, 0x87), Atheros 5416: 2.1.14.9
Bluetooth: Version 4.0.1f4, 2 service, 18 devices, 1 incoming serial ports
Network Service: AirPort, AirPort, en1
PCI Card: pci168c,24, sppci_othernetwork, PCI Slot 5
Serial ATA Device: TOSHIBA MK1655GSXF, 160.04 GB
Parallel ATA Device: MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-857E
USB Device: Mass Storage Device, 0x1307 (USBest Technology Inc.), 0x0330, 0xfd100000 / 3
USB Device: Built-in iSight, apple_vendor_id, 0x8502, 0xfd400000 / 2
USB Device: Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad, apple_vendor_id, 0x021a, 0x5d200000 / 3
USB Device: IR Receiver, apple_vendor_id, 0x8242, 0x5d100000 / 2
USB Device: Bluetooth USB Host Controller, apple_vendor_id, 0x8205, 0x1a100000 / 2

@Frank: I did read through the article shuttersp33d posted. Unfortunately, for my scenario, the support doc redirects me to a page for OSX Lion reinstallation and recovery:
If you purchased Aperture from the Mac App Store and are running OS X Lion:
See the article OS X Lion: About Lion Recovery for instructions about how to reinstall OS X Lion.
That seems overkill and very inconvenient. Can I resolve this issue by restoring PluginManager files from before I installed FC, or something like that?
Thanks again.

Mountain lion not compatible with MBP core 2 duo

Hi there,
I have an MBP 17" which has been running on Leopard until the other day. I wanted to upgrade to Mountain Lion so that I can utilise some of its features. So I upgraded to Snow Leopard as indicated on the Apple Store web pages. I bought the disc and had it mailed to me and have installed and clicked and ticked and restarted and done all the things asked of me in the process to get the OS to the most up-to-date version. (10.6.8)
Now, when I go to Apple's App Store it gives me this message!
We could not complete your purchase.
We could not complete your purchase. OS X Mountain Lion is not compatible with this computer.
So my question is, where do I go from here? Why can they 'not complete my purchase' ? What is 'not compatible' ?
Model Name:     MacBook Pro
Model Identifier:     MacBookPro2,1
Processor Name:     Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:     2.33 GHz
Number Of Processors:     1
Total Number Of Cores:     2
L2 Cache:     4 MB
Memory:     2 GB
Bus Speed:     667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Boot ROM Version:     MBP21.00A5.B08
SMC Version (system):     1.14f5

If your computer isn't compatible, you might be able to upgrade to Lion.        Computer Compatibility - Lion
Check to make sure your applications are compatible.         Application Compatibility

Is the MBP Core 2 Duo worth it?

Hi all
I currently have a 17 inch MacBook Pro Core Duo (about 14 months old). I a considering buying a new MBP with the Core 2 Duo -- will I notice an improvement in speed/operations/general use. Is the new screen better?
Thanks

hannyhan,
Check out the website I provided a few replies up on this topic.
They did some speed tests between the 2.2 and the 2.4 versions and even tested the graphics cards. From what the results showed there was some relative gains to get the 2.4. However, alot also depends on what you'll use the MacBook for. If it's for gaming you might fair better with the 2.4 and the 256MB graphics card.
I use my 2.2 MBP to cut video with FCE and, frankly, I'm satisfied with the performance.

MBP Core 2 duo 2.33 vs. PowerMac G5 dual 2.0

Hey all. Trying to decide what type of computer to buy here. Upgrading from a G4 powerbook (12", 1.5 processor, 1.25GB ram, 100GB 7200rpm HD). I will be using the computer for audio recording (up to 4 simultaneous tracks as of now) with various external firewire audio interfaces.
I am aware of the firewire issues with the new 2.4 MBP's so those are out of the question. My choices are a 1 year old MBP 15" Core 2 Duo 2.33 model with about a year of apple care left or a PowerMacG5 dual 2.0 (early or june 2004 most likely) with either 2x20" monitors or one 23" monitor. All will have about 2 GB ram. Price aside which would you all go for. Which has the obvious power advantage, dual core or dual processors. Also the MBP will have 256mb video ram, the PowerMacG5 will have either 64 or 128mb. obviously the MBP has the upper hand there.
Now to add price into the equation. The PowerMac will cost me about $1400 for the setup with monitors. The MBP, about $1900. What would you all do?
Also, can anyone enlighten me on the differences between different "models" (or production eras) of the MBP. I know the video cards changed manufacturers and ram size throughout the range. Did anything else change substantially? Is one of the "models" exceptionally better than another. Thanks alot...
-ian

Hi rycla, and welcome to Apple Discussions.
rycla wrote:
(a) Can anybody please confirm this is ok to install? (Size dimensions seem correct 9.5mm (height) x 69.85 (width)
Yes, any 9.5mm high SATA will fit.
(b) Would there be any heating issues related to it?
The chances are better than even that it will run hotter than your previous drive. All other things being equal (rarely the case), a 7200 will use more power and create more heat.
(c) How about power.. would it chew up more battery?
See previous answer.
(The reason I've opted for 7200 over 5400 is purely for speed.. I regularly use Audio Production apps as well as Photoshop & FCP so figured the faster RPM would be advantageous?
Again, all other things being equal, a 7200 will certainly be faster.

Install Seagate 750GB 7200 into 15" MBP Core 2 Duo 2.33 GHz...good idea??

Hi Everybody
So my AppleCare has just ended and I'm about to 'change tyres' on my MacBook Pro 15" Core 2 Duo 2.33 GHz by upgrading the tiny 160GB HD to something more spacious.
I've been researching the procedure online, specifically ifixit.com and was initially going to replace HD with a 500GB 7200rpm Seagate - I've just now noticed that there is a 750GB 7200rpm Seagate now available which I think is compatible with my MBP (http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/YST9750420AS/)
(a) Can anybody please confirm this is ok to install? (Size dimensions seem correct 9.5mm (height) x 69.85 (width)
(b) Would there be any heating issues related to it?
(c) How about power.. would it chew up more battery?
(The reason I've opted for 7200 over 5400 is purely for speed.. I regularly use Audio Production apps as well as Photoshop & FCP so figured the faster RPM would be advantageous? RAM is already maxed out)
Look forward to hearing your thoughts as I'd love to order this and have it installed before the new year.
thanks all!

Hi rycla, and welcome to Apple Discussions.
rycla wrote:
(a) Can anybody please confirm this is ok to install? (Size dimensions seem correct 9.5mm (height) x 69.85 (width)
Yes, any 9.5mm high SATA will fit.
(b) Would there be any heating issues related to it?
The chances are better than even that it will run hotter than your previous drive. All other things being equal (rarely the case), a 7200 will use more power and create more heat.
(c) How about power.. would it chew up more battery?
See previous answer.
(The reason I've opted for 7200 over 5400 is purely for speed.. I regularly use Audio Production apps as well as Photoshop & FCP so figured the faster RPM would be advantageous?
Again, all other things being equal, a 7200 will certainly be faster.

Mbp core 2 duo, no display after applying 10.7.5 update

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for