MC.9 Valuated Stock Issue
Hi Experts,
MC.9 stock is showing the quantity where MMBE or RWBE or any other stock report is showing the quantity as zero for particular article.
For Ex. 100000001 article has 20 EA in MC.9 as a valuated stock in store 3001 but whenever I check in MMBE or RWBE or MB5B, the article quantity is showing as Zero.
I checked in MMBE, there is a 20 EA (through STO) in Stock in Transit for the site 3001. But for this financial year, our client has not raised any documents for the article. Even we did the Goods receipt for 20 EA which was on Stock in Transit. But still MC.9 report shows the 20 EA as valuated stock.
Now my question is,
How can I make the Valuated Stock as Zero in MC.9 report??
Any inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
n a v a s h e k
Hi Priyanka,
Already I did the PI with zero quantity for particular combination (Article & site). Physical Inventory (PI)I also got posted successfully. But still valuated stock is exist.
Expecting further help.
Solved. There were two open document from the last financial year and I closed the documents & done the PI with zero count. Now the MC.9 and other stocks reports are shows zero quantity for those articles.
Thanks for all.
Regards,
n a v a h s e k
Edited by: navahsek on Jun 3, 2009 3:00 PM
Similar Messages
-
'Value of valuated stock that has been issued' is different in MCBE and S031
Hello,
I noted that the field 'Value of valuated stock that has been issued' is different in the same period (07.2013) in table S031 and in the transaction MCBE.
Also, if the 'Quantity of valuated stock issues' for this period is 0, how can this field be calculated?
Thank's in advance.
Regards,
Carla RibeiroHello Carla,
I am also analysing the same issue for S031 and MCBE. Found some points to share with you.
What I understood is this is due to Valueated stcock receipt value. This value is being added in issue value in MCBE report.
But not able to get why ? and S031 doesnt have value for valuated stock rec value. This value is being calculated during runtime and added to issue value in MCBE
Pls check and let me know if you have found the solution.
Thanks
Milind -
Valuated stock value ( 0VALSTCKVAL ) - 0IC_C03
Hi,
The std non cumulative keyfig valuated stock value ( 0VALSTCKVAL ) of Inventory cube 0IC_C03 has exception aggr. as 'LAST VALUE' with ref char as 0calday. Could somebody throw light on the calculation of this keyfig? The query sometimes shows the value as the diff of Issue value & Receipt value but sometimes I'm not able to derive the value that comes up in the query..
This is really urgent. All help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
RituHi Vijay & Jaspreet,
Sorry for the delay in replying.. was stuck with something else. Thanks for your explanations. But still the keyfig 0VALSTCKVAL is not consistent with the logic. For some materials, it calculates correctly. But for some I'm not able to figure out the calculation based on the 0IC_C03 records ( based on Issueval & Receipt values).
One e.g. is shown below:
Plant Material CalDay Curr <b>0ISSVS_VAL </b> <b>0RECVS_VAL</b>
12T1 000000100000000016 03/27/2006 USD 6.12 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/26/2006 USD 1.02 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/25/2006 USD 88.40 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/22/2006 USD 0.34 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/21/2006 USD 1.19 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/20/2006 USD 0.85 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/17/2006 USD 1.53 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/16/2006 USD 2.55 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/15/2006 USD 2.04 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/14/2006 USD 12.24 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 03/13/2006 USD 9.35 0.00
12T1 000000100000000016 02/24/2006 USD 0.00 331.67
sum 125.63 331.67
The Query shows the values as shown below :
Value of Valuated Stock Receipt Value, Valuated Stock Issue Value, Valuated Stock
$ 242.40 $ 331.67 $ 125.63
I'm just wondering how the 242.40 came up...
Your input will be highly appreciated..
Thanks,
Ritu -
Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.
Hi Experts,
we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure 0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
{ Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock and Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero. Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
Many Thanks in advance.
JeswanthHi Srini,
I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
Let me explain with an example
Material : XYZ
Plant : A
Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
> 12th April 2009.
So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
Calendar Day Total stock Received stock Issued Stock
28.12.2005 ---> - 2640 EA
29.12.2005 ---> 2000 EA 640 EA 0
10.04.2009 ---> 0 0 2000 EA
11.04.2009 -
> 0 0 0
(For making
the earlier record of initilization to 0 a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) ---> 2640 EA 0 0
13.04.2009
the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values... On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
This is happening only if we use both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF for loading into BW.....
If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
Thanks.
regards,
Jeswanth -
Stock report in BW (valuated stock and Storage Location level)
Dear All,
Regards.We got an situation here,
Case 1: R3 (MB5B) (Both "Storage loc" and "Valuated stock" shows the same Stock Qty)
1).The BW Stock Report shows values the Correct Values for "Receipt Qty" and "Issue Qty" with the Correct "Quantity total Stock" aswell.
Case 2 : R3 (MB5B) (Stock is different between "Storage Loc" and "Valuated Stock")
1).The BW Stock Report shows the "Quantity Total Stock according to VALUATED STOCK Level(MB5B),but the "Receipt Qty" and "Issue Qty" according to STORAGE LOCATION Level(MB5B) .
We followed the "How to Handle Inventory "Doc with the proper sequence of Loading of Infosources and Compression.The data is sitting fine at the cube level.
It would be great if someone can throw some Light on this issue,on how the Query shows a COMBO of both Valuated stock and Storage Location stock....Held up with this issue for quite sometime..Had a look at the Oss Note (589024)...........
Manythanks
ArunHI,
In Inventory we have two quantity fields given to satisfy the requirement.
Valuated stock Qty - 0VALSTCKQTY
Storage Location qty - 0TOTALSTCK
You can make use of them based on your requirement. Hope this helps for you.
Thanks,
Arun -
Inventory: incorrect valuated stock values
this is regarding strange behavior of value of valuated stock (0VALSTCKVAL) in inventory management cube.
after initializing 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF, we're running daily deltas on 2LIS_03_BF.
keyfigure ValStockValue shows incorrect value in report.
This is a non-cumulative keyfigure based on inflow and outflow of 0RECVS_VAL and 0ISSVS_VAL respectively.
in the report drilled down on daily level, 0RECVS_VAL and 0ISSVS_VAL show blank values but valuated stock shows some value. The stock quantities on these days are also none. the incorrect valuated value carried forward to all other days, hence affecting the overall value.
Please tell me how to fix this issue...i've researched alot here without much help.
ThanksHi,
Take a look at OSS Note 745788 - Non-cumulative mgmnt in BW: Verifying and correcting data
Regards. -
Valuated Stock to move to Non Valuated Stock
Dear Gurus
I am looking into an issue from FI perspective and need your valuable inputs.
Business Case:
We have two plants (Plant A & Plant B). Customer would return expired stock to Plant A and these would be kept in Blocked Status as per QM guidelines. These stock are to be destroyed and transferred to Destruction Plant (Plant B) for doing the needful. However since we cannot use plant to plant transfer for block stock, we are left with using 506 & 505 movement type as the only solution for it. However finance would like to have no accounting impact for goods in transit since it has no real value. Hence it wants to writeoff the value (keeping quantitative details for MM intact) at Plant A itself and then trigger the stock movement. Since now the value is zero, it would not trigger accounting document.
We are working in following restrictions:
QA Guidelines suggests that we cannot move stock from Blocked to unrestricted just for this purpose
FI suggests that there shouldn't be by pass from norma standard sap transaction as 505 & 506 is not meant for this purpose
We need to find a way where we can convert selected stocks of a material code from valuated to non-valuated for this purpose.
Would be glad to provide any further clarification, should you so desire.
Appreciate your early response.1) You can move blocked stock from one plant to the other if you don't use delivery for the STO
Stock tranfer order with block stock
2) If you want to move the goods via delivery from one plant to the other you first have to post the stock from blocked to unrestricted stock type. This is a must, technically.
I don't think the "QA guidline" should not allow this if you manage the process carefully - "QA guidline" should consider the real world and not prescribe something which is not possible or possible via development if you spend money on it.
3) Finance should also consider the reality. If the stock is valuated and you transfer it, it may have financial impact.
Would it be ok for finance to move valuated stock w/o financial impact?
If you want to have the expired goods in your supplying plant as non valuated, first you should set proper valuation type for them (if you use split valuation, you may have a valuation type like "EXPIRED" with 0 price) or you can do a material to material transfer (from the valuated material to a non valuated material). In my opinion split valuation is better since you won't loose the material number.
Of course, this will have FI impact in the supplying plant because you are making something of "no real value" from something of "real value".
If your stock is managed under the "EXPIRED" valuation type, I think you can move it to unrestricted because the valuation type itself clearly shows that the goods are of wrong quality.
The stock transfer should have no FI impact if the stock will be received as non valuated in receiving plant.
Just one idea. -
Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3
Dear Friends,
we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
The sequence we followed as:
IN R/3
Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
Stock intialization
Material Movements
Evaluations
IN BW
We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Please help us with your inputs.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
SoujanyaHi Sudheer,
No We haven't implemented this note.
In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
INSERT BEGIN
loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
delete DATA_PACKAGE.
endif.
endloop.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
INSERT END
We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
==========================================================
Notes:
However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
-> material consumption value:
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100' "Other Issues
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101' "Returns / Vendor
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104' "Material Transfer
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105' "Stock Adjustment InvD
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106' "Stock Adjustment Other
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
"Transfers
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
only movements which are relevant for stock control
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000' "Other Receipts
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001' "Goods Receipt/Vendor
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004' "Material Transfer/"Receipt
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005' "Stock Adjustment InvD
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006' "Stock Adjustment Other
OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
"Transfer
only movements which are relevant for stock control
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
result value of the routine
RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
ELSE.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
RETURNCODE = 4.
ENDIF.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0..
-> material consumption quantity:
The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
-> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
======================================================= -
BX/BF - Valuated Stock not correct in Bex-Query
Hello Gurus,
(we are on BI 7.0 with Sp16)
The first qty for the material 10102883 was (assigned to Store) was posted on 01/16/2007.Why does the 01/2004 - 12/2006 shows as -4 and why does 01/2007 shows as 0.I have loaded BX [With 'NO MARKER UPDATE' Indicator NOT set] and the loaded History BF [With 'NO MARKER UPDATE' Indicator SET] .Marker Update etc is correct.
All I want to do is get rid of -8 value for my history which is not correct in my query result:List cube value also pated in the end.:
For :
Material Plant
10102883 2919
***************Without Movt Type Drill Down********
Cal Yr/Moth Valuated stock qty ValStockValue
01.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
02.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
03.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
04.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
05.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
06.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
07.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
08.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
09.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
10.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
11.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
12.2004 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
01.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
02.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
03.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
04.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
05.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
06.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
07.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
08.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
09.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
10.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
11.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
12.2005 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
01.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
02.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
03.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
04.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
05.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
06.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
07.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
08.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
09.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
10.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
11.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
12.2006 -8.00 EA -$ 27,580.72
01.2007 -4.00 EA -$ 13,790.36
02.2007 -4.00 EA -$ 13,790.36
03.2007 -4.00 EA -$ 13,790.36
04.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
01.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
02.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
03.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
04.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
05.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
06.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
07.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
08.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
09.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
10.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
11.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
12.2004 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
01.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
02.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
03.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
04.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
05.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
06.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
07.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
08.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
09.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
10.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
11.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
12.2005 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
01.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
02.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
03.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
04.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
05.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
06.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
07.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
08.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
09.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
10.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
11.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
12.2006 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
01.2007 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
02.2007 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
03.2007 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
04.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
01.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
02.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
03.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
04.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
05.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
06.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
07.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
08.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
09.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
10.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
11.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
12.2004 0.00 EA $ 0.00
01.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
02.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
03.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
04.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
05.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
06.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
07.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
08.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
09.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
10.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
11.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
12.2005 0.00 EA $ 0.00
01.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
02.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
03.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
04.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
05.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
06.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
07.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
08.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
09.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
10.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
11.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
12.2006 0.00 EA $ 0.00
01.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
02.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
03.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
04.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
05.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
06.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
07.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
07.2007 0.00 EA $ 0.00
09.2008 4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
4.00 EA $ 13,790.36
********With Movt Type Drill Down ************************
Calendar Year/Month Movement Type Valuated stock qty Valuated stock qty
01.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
02.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
03.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
04.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
05.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
06.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
07.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
08.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
09.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
10.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
11.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
12.2004 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
01.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
02.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
03.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
04.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
05.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
06.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
07.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
08.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
09.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
10.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
11.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
12.2005 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
01.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
02.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
03.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
04.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
05.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
06.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
07.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
08.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
09.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
10.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
11.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
12.2006 101 -8.00 EA -8.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
01.2007 101 -4.00 EA -4.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
02.2007 101 -4.00 EA -4.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
03.2007 101 -4.00 EA -4.000 EA
102 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
09.2008 # 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
Over All Result 4.00 EA 4.000 EA
**********************R/3 Values From MB5B ********************
The MB5B (in R/3) values are as follows :
Valuation Area 2919
Material 10102883
Description NUBBINS:LIFT,11-3/4" 54.50 LB FJL
Stock/Value on 01/01/0000 0,000 EA 0,00 USD
Total/Val. of Receipts 12,000 EA 41.371,08 USD
Total/Value of Issues 8,000- EA 27.580,72- USD
Stock/Value on 12/31/9999 4,000 EA 13.790,36 USD
SLoc MvT S Mat. Doc. Item DocumentNo Pstng Date Quantity BUn Amount in LC
SB04 101 Q 5000509175 3 5000000647 01/16/2007 4,000 EA 13.790,36
SB04 102 Q 5000529373 3 5000004152 04/02/2007 4,000- EA 13.790,36-
SB01 101 Q 5000537141 2 5000005641 04/25/2007 4,000 EA 13.790,36
TPSI 415 Q 4900197566 1 4900003128 07/03/2007 4,000- EA 13.790,36-
TPSI 415 Q 4900197566 2 4900003128 07/03/2007 4,000 EA 13.790,36
List cube value ********
2919 000000000010102883 321 Q B Q 03.07.2007 200707 EA USD 0,000 0,00 4,000
2919 000000000010102883 321 Q A Q 03.07.2007 200707 EA USD 4,000 0,00 0,000
2919 000000000010102883 415 Q A Q 03.07.2007 200707 EA USD 4,000 13.790,36 4,000
2919 000000000010102883 Q A Q 10.09.2008 200809 EA USD 4,000 13.790,36 0,000
2919 000000000010102883 101 Q B Q 16.01.2007 200701 EA USD 4,000 13.790,36 0,000
2919 000000000010102883 102 Q B Q 02.04.2007 200704 EA USD 4,000- 13.790,36- 0,000
2919 000000000010102883 101 Q B Q 25.04.2007 200704 EA USD 4,000 13.790,36 0,000
EA 16,000 41.371,08 8,000
*****************************End of List cube **Values .
Most of the materials display the stock in the Bex correctly.Few of them (UOM) with EA (each- UOM) is behaving strangely.
I hope some one can address this issue.
Pints will be awarded for sure.Thanks in Advance.Hello,
I have the same problem with Flat mode is not supported! at ... Characteristic.setHierarchy(Characteristic.java:335):
Open, close, reload of the query does not help.
Other SDN-thread "500 Internal Sever - Flat Mode is not Supported!" related to transaction RSRT.
Execution of query via RSRT works, but the problem still persists in the BEx Web Analyzer.
Could be related to a BEx Web Analyzer "bookmark" ("Personalize Web Application").
I have not deleted any item. We use SAP BW 7.0 with a patch level approx. 09.2009.
The "flat-mode" seems to be the "BEx table mode".
SAP hints do not seem to fit here:
- 715820 BW 3.x Front-End Patch 14 (we use BW 7.0)
- 874825 SAPBWNews for BW 3.x Front-End Support Package 19
- 874827 SAPBWNews for BW 3.5 Front-End Patch 08 (we use BW 7.0)
- 905229 update to SAPTableTree
- 909824 Termination in flat mode when an object is deleted (old?)
- 909827 Incorrect InfoProvider-dependent characteristic values
- 910602 Condition includes too many characteristics (usage of deleted elements)
- 915215 Termination when a query definition is changed (old? visibility of elements?)
- 968273 Cache with flat files: Exception is not caught (does not apply to given error)
Any new solutions?
Best regards
Thomas -
Hello all Gurus,
I have a strange problem. For material 0590488025, the stock in plant 1100 is showing as 1638 PCs in MMBE transaction. But actually, physically in storage location 1101 of plant 1100, the stock available for material 0590488025 is 703. That means there is a difference of 935 PCs for this material in reality.
Hence, when I am going to reduce the stock to 703 in SAP system using physical inventory process, the system is giving me an error message saying that the valuated stock will become negative. Hence, it is not allowing me to correct the actual quantity of this material in MMBE transaction. The actual stock should be 703 in MMBE.
I tried posting the goods documents with movement types 702, 551, 562, 261, etcetc. But for every movement type, the system is showing me the same error (I have put the actual error which I am getting in my SAP system):
Valuated stock becomes negative: 232,000- -> see long text
Message no. M7 314
Diagnosis
When a goods movement or an incoming invoice is entered, the system
simulates the update of the valuation data in the material master record
The current simulation indicates that this posting would lead to a
negative stock quantity (or a negative sales value) although negative
stocks are not allowed for this material.
Hence, I am requesting you guys, what is the actual process to reduce the stock in MMBE? How can I remove the 935 PCs from MMBE? Also, in MMBE the stock is shown as 1638 PCs. But in accounting 1 view of material master record for this material, the total stock is shown as 703.
Friends, this is really an important issue. Hence, your earliest mail would be really helpful for me. I really appreciate your solutions.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanththis sounds like an inconsistency and you may have to contact SAP.
I know some cases how such inconsistencies can be created.
E.g. if you create a new plant and forget to set the value update indicator for the material type.
then the quantity goes to stock table MARD but the value is consumed when doing a GR and table MBEW has no stock.
If you then turn on the value update in customizing, then the valuated stock remains still zero while you have inventory.
with the next receipt you add stock to both tables and reduce from both tables with a goods issue.
If you try to reduce more stock than you have in table MBEW, then you get the message you mentioned.
Best you try to find out how the 232 came unvaluated into your system . this may give you (or us) a hint how to resolve it. -
Hi ,
I am working with inventory cube my value for the Current stock ie.valuated stock is not getting tally with R/3 hence i would like to calculated that in the Query level and check..when i wrote formulae like this
Current stock = value stock recieved - value stock issued
but when we click on ok button we get the enhance button but in BI 7.0 we had some else setting becasue i am not getting this option to set the aggregation and exception aggregation please kindly can anyone will help..
thanksThis is derived from material attribute (material type).
Valuated stock - Stock that is considered as inventory with value (in finance terms), eg raw material , say Iron bars, or components (say a PCB).
non-valuated stock - Stock that is considered already consumed (eg your office supplies, even though not fully used, are considered 'spent' the moment they are purchased. Such stock has zero value in your accounting system.) Usually, these are inexpensive stuff used in bulk in production and will be meaningless to keep track of in accounting (say raw material 'sand').
Message was edited by: Ajay Das -
)IC_C03 - Value of valuated stock value ( 0VALSTCKVAL )
Hi,
Could somebody please give me the formula for the standard Non-cumulative Keyfig Value of valuated stock value (0VALSTCKVAL)? Somehow my calculations based on Issue value & Reciept value doesn't work..
Thanks a lot.
Rituhi
There is a table and field in R/3 which will fetch this value directly
Table: s032
Field : wbwbest
You can directly fetch data from this table
You can look out for relation with this field and the related tables to get a formula
Hope this helps
Regards
N Ganesh -
BW showing Negative Material Valuated stock value !
Experts,
in BW i am i am getting all Negative valuated stock value for all material. can anybody suggest what could be the issue ?
in R/3 if the valuated value is $100, then in bw its showing the same value but Negative.
please helpHi,
I had loaded the infocube not correctly. see http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=inventory%20management%20how.to&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CHgQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdn.sap.com%2Firj%2Fscn%2Findex%3Frid%3D%2Flibrary%2Fuuid%2Ff83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328%26overridelayout%3Dtrue&ei=SSxFT9jtLIf04QTq2IGsAw&usg=AFQjCNET9rFiwqY_VrvvCkCktnPxHNhRvg&sig2=2Q5GFescGLZrCbQJXXggAA&cad=rja
1. load datasource 2lis_03_bx into the infocube
2. compress the request -> check the flag "marker update". You have to refresh the stock (flag is not set).
3. check the actual stock with a query. Compare it with the ERP - transaction MB5B.
4. load the datasource 2lis_03_bf with INIT.
5. compress the request -> check the flag "marker update". Now, DON'T to refresh the stock (flag is set).
6. check the historial stock with a query. Compare it with the ERP - transaction MB5B.
now, daily:
7. load the datasource 2lis_03_bf with DELTA.
8. compress the request -> check the flag "marker update". Now, you have to refresh the stock (flag is not set).
9. check the actual stock with a query. Compare it with the ERP - transaction MB5B.
Sven -
-ve valuated stock value of material with zero stock value
Hi,
I am new to this forum.
right now i am facing a severe problem in SAP.
That is,
we have a material in SAP which shows -ve Valuated Stock Value of material but its valuated stock quantity is zero in TC MC.9
while in MB5B both Stock and Value are Zero.
now we want to make the valuated stock value of material in TC MC.9 to zero.
how can we do this.
plz suggest
thanksHello,
this issue may be related to incorrect postings of accouting documents, or missing accouting documents (i.e not considered price changes). Best would be to have this analysed by SAP via an OSS message.
Kind regards
Michael -
Valuated stock becomes negative-Error
Dear all,
when confirming the Pro.order, as per the BOM,all the mat components should be issued/consumed to Production.
But,during this process,system is giving Error message and not allowing to move forward.
with respect to one raw mat component,the Error is like below
VALUATED STOCKS BECOME NEGATIVE
What might be the reason for this error? Please suggest the way.Hi,
Reasons for the message is at the time of issuing, because of MAP formula your MAP is becoming negative. System will not allow to post the document.
Possible reasons are:
by any reasons your MAP of material becomes very low.
your invoices are pending to book of goods inward.
invoice had been booked for low value than GRN value.
If you do not find any problem with material's price than you need to change it through MR21 and post the document.
Regards,
Bhagat
Maybe you are looking for
-
New Inventoried Devices are not shown in ZCC
Hello, we are using ZCM 10.3.1. In the past i installed the Inventory-only Agent on serveral devices. After a little while they are visible in ZCC. But this doesn't seem to work anymore. A few days ago, i installed the Inventory-only client on severa
-
When i try to set up tv signal a pop up message saids tv tuner unavailable. I try restarting a lot of times and only got it to work once. When I went to watch tv, a message came up in the live tv area as set bow top error- unable to control set. Ever
-
What wifi cards are compatible in a HP DV-6 6013tu running Windows 7 32-bit. It won't allow me to change my Wifi card to a better one and it won't let me go into bios when the other wifi card is in.
-
IS Retail POS Financial Implications
Dear Gurus, I just want to know when POS System is integrated with SAP real time,how do you do the correction entry in FI for ex if the user by mistake in payment method. Thanks Anant
-
Entity attribute seems to reset on commit
I'm using JDeveloper 11g 11.1.1.2.0 I have View Object based on two entities. I have a transient attribute on VO which is a copy of the entity based primary key of VO. I have an LOV configured on this transient attibute which I use on my JSPX page. A