MDX Rank function

I am having some trouble getting expected results when using the RANK function. My MDX is below with the result set that gets created. 
The [SF OCC Rank] results are correct but the [Net Rentals Rank] is not.  I am wanting to rank each of the measures to be able to identify which Site is ranked highest in [SF Occ %] and then which site is ranked highest in [Net Rentals].
My data has in total 43 sites.  In my filter I am limiting it to the Sites in [Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12].  There are only 14 sites that should display.  It looks like the [Net Rentals Rank] is ranking all 43 sites instead of
just the 14 that I am wanting. 
Any help is greatly appreciated.  Thanks!
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[SF Occ Rank] as RANK(([Unit].[Site Name].CurrentMember),ORDER(([Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members),[Measures].[SF Occ %], BDESC))
MEMBER [Measures].[Net Rentals Rank] as RANK(([Unit].[Site Name].CurrentMember),ORDER(([Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members),[Measures].[Net Rentals], BDESC))
select {[Measures].[SF OCC %],[Measures].[SF Occ Rank],
           [Measures].[Net Rentals], [Measures].[Net Rentals Rank]} on COLUMNS,
    filter( [Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members,[Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12]) on ROWS
from [CUBE]
where ( [Date].[Calendar].[Month of Year].&[201412],[Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12])

Hi rocko,
   You are correct the Net Rentals Rank will be calculated for all the Sites and will display the result for the current Sites being selected. Do some changes to the query so that you will get the ranks for only the sites you selected. 
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[SF Occ Rank] as RANK(([Unit].[Site Name].CurrentMember),ORDER(([Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members),[Measures].[SF Occ %], BDESC))
MEMBER [Measures].[Net Rentals Rank] as RANK([Unit].[Site Name].CurrentMember,ORDER( Exists( [Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members,[Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12]),[Measures].[Net Rentals], BDESC))
select {[Measures].[SF OCC %],[Measures].[SF Occ Rank],
           [Measures].[Net Rentals], [Measures].[Net Rentals Rank]} on COLUMNS,
    Exists( [Unit].[Site Name].[Site Name].Members,[Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12]) on ROWS
from [CUBE]
where ( [Date].[Calendar].[Month of Year].&[201412],[Site Groups].[Site Group Name].&[12])
Regards,
Venkata Koppula

Similar Messages

  • Rank function use in MDX

    Hi Expert,
    Could you please let me know how can I use rank function in MDX to achieve the result in below format. Highest value should be ranked as 1
    Actual/Expected Dataset appears as:
    Thanks Chandan

    Hi C,
    You can use the mdx RANK() function. For example, this query has ranking of cities by sales amount. You could create two sets, and two calcs with RANK() functions for your challenge.
    WITH
    SET OrderedCities AS Order
    ([Geography].[City].[City].members
    , [Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount], BDESC
    MEMBER [Measures].[City Rank] AS Rank
    ([Geography].[City].CurrentMember, OrderedCities)
    SELECT {[Measures].[City Rank],[Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount],[Measures].[City Rank]} ON 0
    ,[Geography].[City].[City].MEMBERS
    ON 1
    FROM [Adventure Works]
    Hope that helps,
    Richard

  • @Rank function using EVALUATE

    Hi short question,
    I'm trying to get the @rank function to work in combination with OBIEE 10.1.3.4 (using EVALUATE). Anyone here already tried using this with Essbase version 9.2? In some of the documentation it states this can not be done using anything below Essbase 9.3 but the @Rank function is available within v9.2 Is there any limit on using this from the OBIEE side?
    I used this reference:
    (how to:) http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/oracle-bi-ee-101332-handling-sort-order-in-hyperion-essbase-931-evaluate-and-mdx/
    (Essbase 9.2 doc --> @Rank available) http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12032_01/doc/epm.921/html_techref/techref.htm
    Evaluate function I'm trying to launch is:
    EVALUATE(’RANK(%1.dimension.currentmember,%2.members)’ AS INTEGER,Period."PeriodGen4",Period."PeriodGen4")
    Am I doing something wrong here, or am I trying to do things which can't be done?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mathijs

    I tried the syntax
    EVALUATE ('RANK(%1,%2)' as integer,"Account"."Gen4,Account Default","Account"."Gen4,Account Default")
    but still i am getting the error as:-
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Syntax error in input MDX query on line 6 at token 'RANK' (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6, s_7 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen3,Account Default" s_1, "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default" s_2, "FINRPTC#1"."FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear" s_3, "FINRPTC#1"."Period"."Gen3,Period" s_4, EVALUATE ('RANK(%1,%2)' as integer,"FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default","Account"."Gen4,Account Default") s_5, "FINRPTC#1"."FINRPTC"."Actual" s_6, REPORT_AGGREGATE("FINRPTC#1"."FINRPTC"."Actual" BY "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen3,Account Default","FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default","FINRPTC#1"."FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear","FINRPTC#1"."Period"."Gen3,Period") s_7 FROM "FINRPTC#1" WHERE (("FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear" = 'FY12') AND ("Period"."Gen3,Period" = 'Nov') AND ("Account"."Gen3,Account Default" = 'Net Cost of Services')) ) djm

  • How to use "Rank" function  in Oracle?

    I need to display Top 15 records by using rank function.
    Here is my query...I need to pull top 15 FAQ's using the below query.. How can I use RANK function to display the Top 15 FAQ"s in the list.
    Select  distinct SUb1.FAQ,Sub1.FAQ_Hits,GU.display_Name_FMLS as displayname,ev.ParentLinkrecordid,ev.userid from User GU
    Join Event ev
    ON LOWER (ev.userid) IN (LOWER (GU.lanid), LOWER (Gu.racfid))
    Join (Select distinct sm.stem as FAQ,Sum(ev.Eventresults) as FAQ_Hits,ev.ParentLinkrecordid as Topic_ID from Event ev
    Join SubjectMatter sm
    ON (TO_CHAR (sm.smrecordid) = ev.eventdetail1) AND ev.eventdetail1 IS NOT NULL AND sm.smtype = 1
    Where (Upper(ev.eventsubtype) in (Upper('FAQ'),Upper('OPENFAQ')))
    AND TO_DATE (eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') >= TO_DATE ('20100601', 'yyyymmdd')
    and TO_DATE (eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') <= TO_DATE ('20100831', 'yyyymmdd')
    Group by sm.stem,ev.Parentlinkrecordid
    order by FAQ )sub1
    ON Sub1.Topic_ID = ev.ParentLinkrecordid)

    A few bits that I noticed in the query ...
    in (Upper('FAQ'),Upper('OPENFAQ'))1) Do you really a upper for a string which is already in upper case.
    Select distinct sm.stem as FAQ,Sum(ev.Eventresults) as FAQ_Hits,ev.ParentLinkrecordid as Topic_ID2) Do you need a distinct when you are using a GROUP function viz. SUM ?
    You rank query is as follows, I am not very good at the ANSI style JOIN so changed it slightly ... :-)
    Also notice the usage rank function in the "sub1" query.
    select distinct sub1.faq,
                    sub1.faq_hits,
                    gu.display_name_fmls as displayname,
                    ev.parentlinkrecordid,
                    ev.userid
    from user gu, event ev,
      (select rank() over (order by sum(ev.eventresults) desc) rnk,
              sum(ev.eventresults) as faq_hits,
              sm.stem as faq,         
              ev.parentlinkrecordid as topic_id
         from event ev, subjectmatter sm
        where (to_char(sm.smrecordid) = ev.eventdetail1)
          and ev.eventdetail1 is not null
          and sm.smtype = 1
          AND upper(ev.eventsubtype) in ('FAQ', 'OPENFAQ')
          and to_date(eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') >= to_date('20100601', 'yyyymmdd')
          and to_date(eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') <= to_date('20100831', 'yyyymmdd')
        group by sm.stem, ev.parentlinkrecordid
        order by faq) sub1
    where lower(ev.userid) in (lower(gu.lanid), lower(gu.racfid))
      and sub1.topic_id = ev.parentlinkrecordid)
      and sub1.rnk <= 15;Like mentioned above, some sample data would have helped.

  • RANK FUNCTION IN ORACLE 8I

    제품 : PL/SQL
    작성날짜 : 2001-09-11
    RANK FUNCTION IN ORACLE 8I
    ==========================
    EXPLANATION
    oracle 8i(8.1.6) 부터 가능한 rank function 입니다.
    8.1.5 에서는 ora-923 error 가 납니다.
    plsql 내에서는 oracle 9i 부터 가능합니다.
    8.1.6에서는 ora-900 error가 납니다.
    EXAMPLE
    <RANK() OVER ( query_partition_clause ORDER_BY clause) >
    - 중복 rank 값만큼 다음 순위는 생략
    SQL>SELECT deptno, ename, sal, comm,
    RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER BY sal DESC, comm) as rk
    FROM emp;
    DEPTNO ENAME SAL RK
    10 KING 5000 1
    10 CLARK 2450 2
    10 MILLER 1300 3
    20 3500 1
    20 SCOTT 3000 2
    20 FORD 3000 2
    20 JONES 2975 4
    20 ADAMS 1100 5
    20 SMITH 800 6
    30 BLAKE 2850 1
    30 ALLEN 1600 2
    30 TURNER 1500 3
    30 WARD 1250 4
    30 MARTIN 1250 5
    40 JAMES 777 1
    9 1
    <DENSE_RANK( ) OVER ( query_partition_clause ORDER_BY clause ) >
    - 중복 rank 의 수와 무관하게 numbering
    SQL>SELECT dname, ename, sal, DENSE_RANK()
    OVER (PARTITION BY dname ORDER BY sal) as drank
    FROM emp, dept
    WHERE emp.deptno = dept.deptno
    AND dname IN ('SALES', 'RESEARCH');
    DNAME ENAME SAL DRANK
    RESEARCH SMITH 800 1
    RESEARCH ADAMS 1100 2
    RESEARCH JONES 2975 3
    RESEARCH SCOTT 3000 4
    RESEARCH FORD 3000 4
    RESEARCH 3500 5
    SALES WARD 1250 1
    SALES MARTIN 1250 1
    SALES TURNER 1500 2
    SALES ALLEN 1600 3
    SALES BLAKE 2850 4
    plsql 내에서 사용 가능 :oracle 9i 부터
    SQL> create table
    rank_emp(deptno number(2), ename varchar2(20), sal number(5), rk number(2));
    테이블이 생성되었습니다.
    SQL> create or replace procedure window_plsql AS
    query_str VArchar2(1000);
    begin
    query_str := 'insert into rank_emp
    SELECT deptno, ename, sal,
    RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY deptno ORDER BY sal DESC, comm) as rk
    FROM emp' ;
    Execute Immediate query_str;
    end;
    2 /
    프로시저가 생성되었습니다.
    SQL> exec window_plsql
    PL/SQL 처리가 정상적으로 완료되었습니다.
    SQL> select * from rank_emp;
    DEPTNO ENAME SAL RK
    10 KING 5000 1
    10 CLARK 2450 2
    10 MILLER 1300 3
    20 SCOTT 3000 1
    20 FORD 3000 1
    20 JONES 2975 3
    20 ADAMS 1100 4
    20 SMITH 800 5
    30 BLAKE 2850 1
    30 ALLEN 1600 2
    30 TURNER 1500 3
    DEPTNO ENAME SAL RK
    30 WARD 1250 4
    30 MARTIN 1250 5
    30 JAMES 950 6
    14 개의 행이 선택되었습니다.

    That's correct
    The differences between Standard and Enterprise Edition are listed here:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oracle8i/pdf/8i_fam.pdf

  • Prob in using rank in pl/sql ,need logic same of rank function in any way

    I have a query as of the following <br>
    <br>
    SELECT sr_no,cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due,amt_arrear_due<br>
    FROM ( select cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due,sum(amt_arrears_due) <br>amt_arrear_due,rank() over (partition by cod_acct_no order by <br>dat_arrears_due asc) sr_no<br>
              from arrears_table <br>
              where amt_arrears_due > 0<br>
    and dat_arrears_due <= to_date('31/10/2006','dd/mm/yyyy')<br>
    and COD_ARREAR_TYPE = 'C'<br>
         group by cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due<br>
         ) Z <br>
    WHERE z.sr_no <=5 <br>
    <br>
    I have to use this in a cursor in pl/sql but because i have rank analytic function <br>
    I am facing a compilation error ORA-06550: error <br>
    <br>
    Can you give me a logic which gives same output as of above <br>
    <br>
    Regards<br>
    vamsi krishna<br>
    <br>
    <br>

    [1]: (Error): ORA-06550: line 5, column 28: PLS-00103: Encountered the <br>symbol "(" when expecting one of the following: , from <br>
    <br>
    My oracle version is <br>
    Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    PL/SQL Release 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    CORE 8.1.6.0.0 Production<br>
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    NLSRTL Version 3.4.1.0.0 - Production<br>
    <br>I think it is comming for rank function it self <br>
    <br> will this version support analytic (rank) function's in pl/sql cursors<br>
    Regards<br>
    vamsi krishna<br>

  • Rank function without filter in the report

    Hi,
    I have a problem with Rank() function. The problem is the next one.
    I have a table with this rows:
    User | DATE | Cost
    user1 | 12/02/2011 | 10,4
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 11,1
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 10,1
    user1 | 13/02/2011 | 8,1
    user2 | 12/02/2011 | 1,4
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 12,1
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 22,1
    user2 | 13/02/2011 | 8,1
    In the rpd I have a agregate row as SUM(COST), and I need extract te ranking of this SUM(COST) per user, The sum of user1 is 39,7 and the sum of the user 2 is 43,7. If I show in the report all users, the ranking is correct Rank=1 per user2 and Rank=2 per user1, but the problem is that I only want show the user1, when I add a filter to the report user='user1' the ranking value changes from 2 to 1. I need that the ranking value doesn´t change when I introduce a filter.
    Any idea about how to solve this problem?
    Thanks

    Hi Antonio,
    On the Rank column in the answers edit the formula as given below.
    Case when username = 'user2' then Rank(sum(cost)) else 0 end
    Then apply a filter on the Rank column as Rank > 0.
    I hope this one helps you.
    Regards
    AP

  • How to use RANK function ?

    Hello everyone,
    here is the query I run in sql developer using RANKFunction.
    SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal
    FROM
    (SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal,
    *RANK*() OVER
    (ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST) AS Emp_Rank
    FROM Emp
    ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST)
    WHERE Emp_Rank < 6;How I can use this query in my report in obiee or is there any replacement of RANK() function in obiee so that I can use that to get my same above result.
    Thanks

    Kuldip wrote:
    Thanks, you are absolutely correct. However, By doing this I am getting my output as whic I was not expecting.
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 3
    student4 93 3
    student5 91 5
    The output should be as instead
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 2
    student4 93 2
    student5 91 3
    Can It be done like this ?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Kuldip on Mar 15, 2012 11:51 PMHi Boss,
    I think you copied the above scenario from this site..
    http://oracle-bi.siebelunleashed.com/articles/rank-and-dense-rank-functionsobiee/
    Then why asking how to do this? Are you testing us? Doesn't that site say how to achieve this?

  • Rank function

    how to use the RANK function in oracle data integrator??

    Hi,
    a little google could help you..
    https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2158588
    Let us know

  • Rank Function taking a long time to execute in SAP HANA

    Hi All,
    I have a couple of reports with rank function which is timing out/ or taking a really long time to execute, Is there any way to get the result in less time when rank functions are involved?
    the following is a sample of how the Query looks,
    SQL 1:
    select      a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over(partition by a.column1 order by sum(b.column2) asc)
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analyticview1"         b
                    join          "Table1"            a
                      on          (a.column2 = b.column3)
    group by  a.column1,
    b.column1;
    SQL 2:
    select    a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over( order by min(b.column1) asc) WJXBFS1
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analytic view2"         b
                    cross join                "Table 2"               a
    where      (a.column2  like '%a%'
    and b.column1  between 100 and 200)
    group by  a.column1,
                    b.column1
    when I visualize the execution plan,the rank function is the one taking up a longer time frame. so I executed the same SQL without the rank() or partition or order by(only with Sum() in SQL1 and Min() in SQL 2) even that took a around an hour to get the result.
    1.Does anyone have an any idea to make these queries to execute faster?
    2. Does the latency have anything to do with the rank function or could it be size of the result set?
    3. is there any workaround to implement these rank function/partition inside the Analytic view itself? if yes, will this make it give the result faster?
    Thank you for your help!!
    -Gayathri

    Krishna,
    I tried both of them, Graphical and CE function,
    It is also taking a long time to execute
    Graphical view giving me the following error after 2 hr and 36 minutes
    Could not execute 'SELECT ORDER_ID,ITEM_ID,RANK from "_SYS_BIC"."EMMAPERF/ORDER_FACT_HANA_CV" group by ...' in 2:36:23.411 hours .
    SAP DBTech JDBC: [2048]: column store error: search table error:  [2620] executor: plan operation failed
    CE function - I aborted after 40 mins
    Do you know the syntax to declare local variable to use in CE function?

  • Rank function in a crosstab

    I'm trying to rank products based on the order in which they have been bought (by purchase date).
    I figured out I could use the Rank function. First problem was that Rank doesn't seem to work on Dates. I have come across this issue by using the DaysBetween function to calculate the days inbetween the first purchase date and today. This gives me a measure that I can use within the Rank function.
    Works fine for single Dimention values. However, when I create a cross-tab with multiple values on top, this doesn't work anylonger.
    See the example that shows where it goes wrong: [http://www.littlesister.com/example.xls]
    Does anyone have any idea how to solve this?
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Paul,
    In the crosstab with the multiple values remove the sort on the rank (if it is still on) and put a break on the object which shows the data for Americas, AP, EMEA and WW.
    That should show the correct ranking (at least it does in an example I build myself).
    Regards,
    Harry

  • RANK Function in AIX vs Windows

    I am facing an issue where when I run my report using my windows machine I am able to get the right results with the RANK function. However, when I ran the same report in my AIX machine, I got the following error:
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 378077472. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server/Query/Optimizer/ServiceInterfaceMgr/Src/SQOIGeneratorBuiltIn.cpp, line 3403. (HY000)
    If anyone has run into this, please let me know.
    Thanks.

    One point to make is the Rank function works if you create 1 column with the RANK function in Answers(i.e. Rank(Fact.Sales) ). The issue comes up when you try to create a BIN column to bucket the RANKs in a seperate column.
    Here's the SQL:
    SELECT Location.Location saw_0, case WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 1 AND 5 then '1-5' WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 5 AND 10 then '5-10' else 'other' end saw_1, Metrics.Sales saw_2, RANK(Metrics.Sales) saw_3 FROM "Rank Prototype" ORDER BY saw_0
    So Basically, the issue is when you have a Bucketed Rank Sales Column and a simple Rank Column in the same request. (In AIX the issue exists, in Windows there is no issue.)

  • Sql tuning using rank function

    Hi,
    Can someone help me in writing the below qry using rank() function?
    DELETE FROM stc_calllog_ext a
    WHERE a.stc_save_status = 'CT'
    AND ROWID IN (SELECT a.ROWID
    FROM stc_calllog_ext a, calllog_ext b
    WHERE a.prod_line_code= b.prod_line_code
    AND a.brand_code = b.brand_code
    AND a.model_number = b.model_number
    AND a.stc_save_status != b.stc_save_status
    AND trunc(a.stc_start_time) = trunc(b.stc_start_time)
    AND a.stc_start_time BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE-8) AND TRUNC(SYSDATE)
    AND a.call_taker_userid = b.call_taker_userid
    AND a.cons_telephone_no =b.cons_telephone_no
    )

    With the information you have provided, I've come up with the following.
    SELECT A.ACCOUNT_NO, A.PAYMENT_TYPE, A.INSTALLMENT_TYPE, A.DATE_CHANGE
    FROM
        (SELECT account_no, payment_type, installment_type, date_change,
                LEAD( (payment_type), 1)
                     over (partition by account_no order by account_no, DATE_CHANGE)  LEAD_PAY,
                LEAD( (installment_type), 1)
                     over (partition by account_no order by account_no, DATE_CHANGE)  LEAD_INST
          from T_ACCNTS ) A
    WHERE A.PAYMENT_TYPE <> NVL(A.LEAD_PAY,99)
       OR A.INSTALLMENT_TYPE <> NVL(A.LEAD_INST,99)
    ORDER BY 1, 4;

  • Error using Rank function in Answers

    Hi All,
    Am trying to generate a report in Answers which lists Top Accounts with Revenue.
    I Ranked the Revenue field and it is returning me correct values. ( Rank(account.revenue) )
    But, when I try to filter on this field and restrict the rows which shows only top 10 Accounts, it is returning the following error:
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 1792, message: ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000 at OCI call OCIStmtExecute. [nQSError: 17010] SQL statement preparation failed. (HY000)
    Can any one help me on this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Imtiaz.

    Hi Joe,
    This is the Physical query generated when I use Rank function and the report is fine.
    select distinct D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8, D1.c9, D1.c10, D1.c11, D1.c12, D1.c13, D1.c14 ORDER BY D1.c1 ASC, D1.c2 ASC, D1.c3 ASC, D1.c4 ASC, D1.c5 ASC, D1.c6 ASC, D1.c7 ASC, D1.c8 ASC, D1.c9 ASC, D1.c10 ASC, D1.c11 ASC, D1.c12 ASC, D1.c13 ASC, D1.c14 ASC) as c16
    from
    (select distinct T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c16 = 1 )
    ) D1
    order by c1 desc
    But When I apply Filter on this Rank column then it gives me the error. THis is the Physical query for that
    select distinct Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14
    from
    (select T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14,
    Case when T690.SUM_REVN_AMT is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY T690.SUM_REVN_AMT DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c15
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c15 <= 10 )
    ) D1
    order by c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15
    Thanks,
    Imtiaz

  • Filter on Rank function 10g

    Hi Friends,
    Need your help. Please!!!
    I have used the RANK function to know the different Start, end date period for a Enrollment.NO.
    What I want next is to show only the Enroll No, start, end date for a Enrollment No. with the earliest start date, end date. i.e Max(Rank) for that enrollment No.
    for RANK column I have used the function RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No")
    EnRoll No.      Start Date,      End Date,                  Rank
    BAD-002     01-Oct-12     31-Dec-12     1
              01-Jul-12     30-Sep-12     2
              01-Apr-12     30-Jun-12     3
    RIS-401     01-Dec-06     28-Feb-07     1
              01-Sep-06     30-Nov-06     2
              01-Jun-06     31-Aug-06     3
              01-Mar-06     31-May-06     4
              01-Dec-05     28-Feb-06     5
              01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     6
              01-Jun-05     31-Aug-05     7
              01-Mar-05     31-May-05     8
              01-Dec-04     28-Feb-05     9
    RCB-235     01-Dec-08     28-Feb-09     1
              01-Sep-08     30-Nov-08     2
              01-Jun-08     31-Aug-08     3
              01-Mar-08     31-May-08     4
              01-Dec-07     29-Feb-08     5
              01-Sep-07     30-Nov-07     6
              01-Jun-07     31-Aug-07     7
              01-Mar-07     31-May-07     8
              01-Dec-06     28-Feb-07     9
              01-Sep-06     30-Nov-06     10
              01-Jun-06     31-Aug-06     11
              01-Mar-06     31-May-06     12
              01-Dec-05     28-Feb-06     13
              01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     14
    My desired output is:
    EnRoll No.     Start Date     End Date     Rank
    BAD-002     01-Apr-12     30-Jun-12     3
    RIS-401     01-Dec-04     28-Feb-05     9
    RCB-235     01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     14
    Please help me. Its urgent. I am struck at this point.
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Aachala

    Hi Aachala,
    Add the following to your filter and you should be all set...
    MAX(RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No") by "EnRoll No") = RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No") by "EnRoll No")
    JB

Maybe you are looking for