Me2l issue
Hi
In t.code me2l i am selecting document type and selection parameters i give open goods receipt,but my system showing grn completed also plz help.
regards
sam
Depends on selection parameter settings, pls check and creaet your own selection parameter in this menu
SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Reporting > Selection Parameters > Define Selection Parameters
Similar Messages
-
Issue in ALV reporting in ME2L transaction
Hi All,
I have a default layout setting in the ME2L out put ( In ECC6.0,ALV grid option),where in the sort order tab,I have subtotals fuction.
If I choose other layout,in the sort order tab,I dont find subtotals function.
What could be the reason.
Thanks,
SesahdriHi
You will have sub total option only in ALV grid display, you will not have it in classical output display.
Regards
Prasad -
ME2L Delivery Schedule Showing Fully Delivered Lines
Hey,
We are experiencing this issue on a SAP 4.7c system that we support.
Our business are trying to generate a report, every month, that is sent to vendors, of all the purchase orders that the business are expecting them to fill. To do this the business user uses ME2L report per vendor, only selecting the Schedule Agreements documents, hitting the calendar button (Delivery Schedule), exporting the resulting output to Excel, using a formula to identify the lines which have a GR value less than the Scheduled Qty value and sending these onto the vendor as a notification to the that these are the orders that the business have marked as outstanding.
The issue arose when the business cancelled lines on Scheduling Agreement 5500000073 by going into MD04 and deleting the requirement for vendor 5033760 and reassigned those requirements to a new Agreement 5500000053 for vendor 5000259.
However when you run the process above the deleted lines still show up on the report and you believe this should not be the case and never was the case.
What process to accurately identify on SAP, schedule line items, that have not being fully Goods Receipted and/or cancelled so they can be sent to the vendor?
Many thanks for any help,
ColmHi Jurgen,
Apologies for the delay, I was away on leave.
We use selection parameters WE101 and that correctly brings us back only open orders on the selection screen, however when we click the Delivery Schedule button it displays lines that have been fully Goods Receipted.
For example, if I have a PO with 3 lines, Lines 1 and 3 have been fully received and line 2 has only been partly received.
I run ME2L with the selection parameter WE101 and the report only displays line 2. Which is correct.
However when I click the delivery schedule button I will be shown the entire history of that line, including scheduled quantites that were fully goods receipted.
What I would like to see is only lines where the scheduled quantity is greater than the goods receipted quantity.
I hope this makes sense, thanks for your help,
Regards,
Colm -
Material which is already partially delivered are appearing in the base list of ME2L Report but the same is not reflecting in Delivery schedule report.Pls help
Hi Pradeep,
Check whether any filters have been applied because we had same kind of issue with me5a.
Regards
Pavan -
How we will know the amount of issued P.O.
Hi All please suggest me,
When we issue a Purchase Order then there is accounting effect or entry.
If there is no accounting effect how fi user will understand from system how much Purchase Order
has been issued. Because according to that the accountant have to arrange the fund to meet those
expenses . Please tell me how it will show the cash flow of the company in the system .
Best Regards
Amitava SahaDear:
No accounting entry is generated at the time of PO creation. FI is only updated at MIGO and MIRO. However you can cater your requirement from ME2L.
Regards -
HI, while executing ME2l , i am getting the below abap error,
Category ABAP Programming Error
Runtime Errors SAPSQL_PARSE_ERROR
Except. CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX
ABAP Program RM06EL00
Application Component MM-PUR
Date and Time 17.04.2014 14:05:40
Short Text
An error has occurred while parsing a dynamic entry.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "RM06EL00" had to be terminated because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
An exception has occurred which is explained in more detail below. The
exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX' was not
caught and
therefore caused a runtime error. The reason for the exception is:
The current ABAP program attempted to execute an Open SQL statement
containing a dynamic entry. The parser returned the following error: "'NULL'
was expected here."
Missing Handling of System Exception
Program RM06EL00
Trigger Location of Exception
Program RM06EL00
Include RM06EL00
Row 175
Module Name START-OF-SELECTION
SourceCde
CHECK sy-subrc IS NOT INITIAL.
* set flag xauth to 'X' so that there is a message on the screen that shows that the list
PERFORM set_xauth(sapfm06l).
* create single auth. filter entry
CLEAR lv_authfilter_sgl.
CONCATENATE 'BSTYP = ' '''' "#EC NOTEXT
ekko-bstyp '''' "#EC NOTEXT
' AND BSART = ' '''' "#EC NOTEXT
ekko-bsart '''' "#EC NOTEXT
' AND EKORG = ' '''' "#EC NOTEXT
ekko-ekorg '''' "#EC NOTEXT
' AND EKGRP = ' '''' "#EC NOTEXT
ekko-ekgrp '''' "#EC NOTEXT
INTO lv_authfilter_sgl RESPECTING BLANKS. "#EC NOTEXT
CONCATENATE '(' lv_authfilter_sgl ')' INTO lv_authfilter_sgl. "#EC NOTEXT
* check if first authority issue or not
IF lv_found_auth_issue IS INITIAL.
CLEAR lv_authfilter.
lv_found_auth_issue = abap_true.
else.
167 CONCATENATE ' OR ' lv_authfilter_sgl INTO lv_authfilter_sgl RESPECTING BLANKS. "#EC NO
168 ENDIF.
169 * concatenate single entry to whole authority filter
170 CONCATENATE lv_authfilter lv_authfilter_sgl INTO lv_authfilter RESPECTING BLANKS.
171 ENDLOOP.
172 CONCATENATE '(' lv_authfilter ')' INTO lv_authfilter. "#EC NOTEXT
173
174 *- Lesen Belegköpfe --------------------------------------------------*
>>>>> SELECT * FROM ekko INTO TABLE lt_ekko_all
176 WHERE lifnr IN el_lifnr
177 AND ekorg IN el_ekorg
178 AND bstyp IN r_bstyp
Source Code ExtractThanks abhijit for the response.
I am unable to open the Sap Note. Its saying document is not released.
Our BW system has been upgraded to 7.4 latest version from 7.0. After up gradation few datasources for product area are not fetching records while we are running infopackages from BW side. Datasources are 0PR_PURCHASE_CATEG_ATTR , 0PRODUCT_ATTR , 0PR_PROD_VAR_ATTR , 0PR_BASE_UNIT_ATTR , 0PR_SALES_CATEG_ATTR. Loads are getting failed with short dump in source .
This is dump.
Category ABAP Programming Error
Runtime Errors SAPSQL_PARSE_ERROR
Except. CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX
ABAP Program SAPLCOM_PRODUCT_BW_SMASHED
Application Component AP-MD-PRO
Date and Time 08/28/2014 04:29:03
Short Text
An error has occurred while parsing a dynamic entry.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLCOM_PRODUCT_BW_SMASHED" had to be terminated
because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
An exception has occurred which is explained in more detail below. The
exception is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX' and was not caught
in procedure
"COM_PR_CAT_PUR" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated this
exception, the current program was terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
The current ABAP program attempted to execute an Open SQL statement
containing a dynamic entry. The parser returned the following error: ""." is
not valid here." -
Hi,
What is the difference between selection parameters "WE101" and "WE103" in the ME2L / ME2M transaction.Both has the same description.WE101 define "Comparison operand between qty. issued and qty. ordered" but WE103 is not defind.
Comparison operand between qty. issued and qty. ordered
Definition
Determines which items are to be selected in purchasing lists (for example, the list of "purchase orders for a material").
Procedure
Enter the operator (for example, >, < or =) that satisfies the desired selection criteria.
Example
Only those purchase order items that are not yet "closed" (that is, not yet fully issued or invoiced) are to be listed.
This is the case if the quantity issued or invoiced is less than the quantity ordered.
Enter < in the selection criteria, for example:
Issued < ordered quantity
Invoiced< ordered quantity -
New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)
I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York. I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
1. I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention. Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording. I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows. I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR. Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
2. I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes. One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day. My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new". Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR. Any fixes?
Thanks for the help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.I came from RCN about a year ago. Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable. Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
Some general principles.
Saving changes. When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes. Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options. Look at the Series Options window. Look at the far right side. There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes. Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
Default Series Options. This is accessed from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options. This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options. You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create. Be sure to SAVE your changes. This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide. When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead. Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
Non-series recordings. With Fios you have no directly available options for these. With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series. With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later; change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
And now, to the unwanted repeats.
First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only". If not, fix that and SAVE. Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New". It happens. Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time". To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide. Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored.
Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New". These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel". Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes". However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.
As for you missing two minutes, I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time. To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time. You might have an older software version. Newest is v.1.8. Look at Menu--Settings--System Info. Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes. I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording. There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them. With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half. -
Pension issue Mid Month Leaving
Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
AshwaniDear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010 0.00 96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010 0.00 541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
/111 EPF Basis 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009 0.00 99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani -
Open PO Analysis - BW report issue
Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM DOC_ITEM DOCTYPE COMP_DEL
650000001 10 UB X
650000001 20 UB X
650000001 30 UB
650000001 40 UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampathHi Priya and Reddy
Thanks for your response.
Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No. Doc.No. Item Processkey Rocancel Elikz
41 6500000001 30 11 X ---
42 6500000001 30 11 --- X
43 6500000001 30 10 X ---
44 6500000001 30 10 --- ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath -
HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue
Hello,
I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
Regards,
AnatolyI am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
Click on New Post.
I hope this helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP -
Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue
Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
Physical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3073 MHz
Built-in memory: 12279 MB
Free memory: 9577 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
Image tile size: 128K
First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
Any help will be gratefully accepted.
Dougfunction(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
doug87510 wrote:
The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key. When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair. That's a feature, not a bug.
Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out. I will download them and try them now myself.
Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing... QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe. Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
-Noel -
Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0
Hello,
I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
The issues i am facing --
1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are - Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
--Regards
DedeepyaHi Anu,
i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
You can preset your break-points at :-
1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
Regards
Dedeepya C -
Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10
Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05 matmas05
E1MARAM Master material general data (MARA)
Z1KLART KLART----
My extention
E1MARA1 Additional Fields for E1MARAM
E1MAKTM Master material short texts (MAKT)
E1MARCM Master material C segment (MARC)
Z1AUSPM E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
E1MARC1 Additional Fields for E1MARCM
E1MARDM Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
E1MFHMM Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
E1MPGDM Master material product group
E1MPOPM Master material forecast parameter
E1MPRWM Master material forecast value
E1MVEGM Master material total consumption
E1MVEUM Master material unplanned consumption
E1MKALM Master material production version
E1MARMM Master material units of measure (MARM)
E1MBEWM Master material material valuation (MBEW)
E1MLGNM Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
E1MVKEM Master material sales data (MVKE)
E1MLANM Master material tax classification (MLAN)
E1MTXHM Master material long text header
E1CUCFG CU: Configuration data
E1UPSLINK Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PMCREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ? -
Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA
Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
SafiThanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi
Maybe you are looking for
-
My ipod wont let me update apps or buy songs
the apps keep waiting but never download and so do the songs
-
Is it possible to upgrade a macbook pro 15 late 2008 memory upgrade to 8 go
Hi from Belgium, Is it possible to upgrade a macbook pro 15 late 2008 memory from 4 to 8 go. And if yes would i have to replace both memory modules. I'm also experiencing problems with the battery. Could you tell me if the new replacement batteries a
-
OBIEE 11.1.1.6.X MUD - Empty Presentation Folders Disappearing after checkout
Hello , We are facing an issue when checking out a project from Master Repository configured in MUD environment. Empty presentation folders in subject area's are disappearing when a project is checked out. I confirmed Master repository has all the em
-
XI to IBM Websphere Default JMS Provider with JNDI
Hello everybody! We face a problem with connecting SAP XI to IBM WebSphere Default JMS Provider (need to send a message from XI to WebSphere JMS and receive the response). We have the following versions installed: SAP XI: 7.0 SP8 , Sun JDK 1.4.2
-
The output (headphone) jack on my MacBook has a red light in it and I can't produce any sound from my built in speakers. Also, I cannot control the volume level; it shows the volume maxed out, but all the slider controls are greyed out and, using the