ME2O - Two deliveries getting created !!!

Hi,
I have referred the previous posts on this topic. But couldn't get a satisfactory answer.
Re: Subcontracting Delivery (LB) split through ME2O
Scenario :- When I run ME2O (1 header and 10 components) system creates two deliveries SOMETIMES. This happens once in a while only. With the same set of data, I have tried creating later on, it created only one delivery !!! Seems, there is no logic in delivery split.
All the below conditions are correct
a) Based on delivery date
b) Shipping Point
c) Shipping Condition
d) Delivery Type
e) Loading group
f) Route (we are not using route determination)
Does anybody have a clue on this?
The only thing which is different in two deliveries is the 'Weight group'. But with this also system is not creating 2 deliveries always. It creates only sometimes.......

the requirement date is probably different.

Similar Messages

  • Duplicate deliveries getting created by batch job against STO

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing one issue where duplicate deliveries are getting created by batch job against Intercopmany STO.
    Scenario is PO having one line item with ordered qty of 8000kg.
    Through batch job, two deliveries got created on same day for PO line item.
    One delivery got created for 8000kg and another delivery has got created for 7000Kg. So user has deleted second delivery of 7000kg.
    Next day again the delivery got created for 8000kg for the same PO line item through batch job.
    I am wondering how the duplicate deliveries are getting created by batch job for PO even though it has no open items.
    All deliveries got created through batch job only as cross checked the user name in delivery.
    Kindly help to fix the issue.

    Hi Amit
    I assume you are talking about outbound deliveries.  In this case it would be worth checking the customer master record for the receiving plant.  In the sales area data there is a shipping tab which contains several settings used to control delivery creation for customers.
    It is possible to control how the system behaves when you have a stock shortage and restrict the number of partial deliveries.  This might help you control this situation and might be the cause.
    Regards
    Robyn

  • Two shipments getting created by one delivery

    Hi,
    I have a problem in which 2 shipments are getting created for one Delivery document, whereas only 1 Shipment document should be there. When I analysed the shipment documents, I found that the shipment route and forwarding agent are different in both the documents.
    Any idea why this is happening? Also, want to know-
    1. Is it possible to combine deliveries of different Routes and Fwd agents into one shipment document (VT01N) ?
    Thanks.

    hello, friend.
    it is possible to have 2 or more routes and 2 or more agents in a collective shipment.  in this case, there is a main route and the sub-routes become stages.  it is possible that each stage could have a different agent.
    in your case as originally stated, you may not combine more than 1 route or agent in an individual shipment.  if your items in the delivery document have different routes or agents, then these items will be split into different shipments.
    regards.

  • Two deliveries required for one sales order

    Hello Friends,
    I have a quirey , I have two types of goods in one sales order, one is dangerous goods and other one is normal. How ever we are thinking to make two seperate deliveries even they are in one sales order. How can two diff deliveries gets created.
    We are planning to create new shipping point with new loading group for the dangerous goods .
    Will the above decision works or is there any simplest way to create two auto deliverys for one sales order.
    Reg.

    Hi all,
    I have yet another proposal - using copy control and adding there dangerous goods profile LIPS-PROFL as split criterial. This field is populated originally from material master MARA-PROFL field.  You can check for example routine FV50C201. Split criteria are defined in likp-zukrl field.
    I think that is better solution then introducing new shipping point. Because there are some determinations and dependencies related to shipping points. So the more shipping points you have, the more additional config you have. If it is needed by business to have separate shipping points - then fine. But if the goods are shipped from the same place, then I would rather modify copy control instead of multiplying config and master data. I say duplicated effort in master data - because with 2 shippiong points you would need to maintain DG profile field and additionally loading group.
    Kind regards
    Witek Prawecki.

  • VF01 - problem to create one invoice of two deliveries

    Hello,
    I'm trying to invoice two deliveries which are identical except of the part number.
    I go into VF01, enter both delivery note numbers, press ENTER and when I try to save follwoing message popup:
    Reference document 6200000296 000010 (Error during INSERT)
    Message no. VF004
    +If the error occurs and you have a CRM System connected to your ERP System, the document may have + been archived in the CRM System.
    +
    => NO !!!
    For your info: 1st cust. order is 6200000295, 2nd is 6200000296
    I almost checked everything in SPRO! Without seeing an error!
    Can anyone help me?
    Thanks and kind regards
    wolfi.

    Not sure whether this link will be helpful to you but you can try.
    [Display Work Center in ECC 6.0|http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-pp/display-work-center-in-ecc-60-1372250]
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise invoice should not get created without PGI

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where the billing document is being generated by the customer without PGI after creation of outbound delivery for exports. (This is as per customer's requirement - Copy control maintained in VTFL for the same - copying requirements 11 )
    This creates a situation - excise invoice can be created without PGI - which creates problems for customer. This should not happen.
    Customer wants a check during the excise invoice creation - excise invoice should not get created if PGI has not been done.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Saravanan
    Two options are there
    -  in your existing routine itself, you can specify the control in such a way that unless the preceding document is PGId
    -  apply excise user exits like J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE to achieve the requirement.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Two Deliveries did not go through Batch Job Runing

    Hi,
    In this company every evening the automatic batch Job for Billing due list is run but on Nov 23 one Deliver and on Nov 30 another delivery has not gone through i.e. the invoices were not created for these two deliveries.
    I checked in VF01, the individual invoice is being created. The user is asking the reason for this and how to prevent this type of situation in future.
    I don't know the Batch Job number and I think it has been done in VF06.
    Please guide me how I can solve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Jans

    Hello Tushar,
    Thank you for your reply. I don't know the Variant name also and I don't know the Batch Job number eirther. The user is not aware of these things. I tried to find out from VF06 but I could not figure out anything.
    Please explain me your sentece "Execute billing program in foreground and check". you mean to say after creating the same scenario in the quality, I will run the Billing program ( I will take the Billing program from the VF01). If I am correct please let me know.
    Regarding debugging,  if I have to do how I can do it. I know to go to Debuggiing mode if I put in the command field  "/h" , I will be in the debugging mode. But my question is which transaction Should I use VL02N or VF01 to find out the Problem
    I have mentioned earlier that I went to VF01 and these deliveries are fine to create invoices but the User is interested to know the Problem and to find out the cause so that they can prevent it occuring in future.
    Thanks,
    Jans

  • Extra job getting created in dynamic handling of jobs

    I have the below code and I notice an extra job that is being created in SM35. Any reasons/clues please
    bdcjob will have A/P_ACCOUNTS_BDC
    adrjob will have A/P_ACCOUNTS_ADDRESS
    Name of the batch input session is A/P
    The 3rd extra job that is coming up is 'A/P' and I did not open any job by that name.
    Thanks for your help.
    Kiran
    DATA: bdcjob TYPE tbtcjob-jobname,
          bdcnum TYPE tbtcjob-jobcount,
          adrjob TYPE tbtcjob-jobname,
          adrnum TYPE tbtcjob-jobcount,
          params LIKE pri_params,
          l_valid   TYPE c.
    CHECK fileonly IS INITIAL.
    MOVE: jobname TO bdcjob.
    adrjob = 'A/P_ACCOUNTS_ADDRESS'.
    IF NOT logtable[] IS INITIAL.
      IF NOT testrun IS INITIAL.
    *   If its a test run, Non Batch-Input-Session
        SUBMIT rfbikr00 AND RETURN
                        USER sy-uname
                        WITH ds_name EQ file_o
                        WITH fl_check EQ 'X'.         "X=No Batch-Input
      ELSE.
    *   Create a session which will be processed by a job
        SUBMIT rfbikr00 AND RETURN
                        USER sy-uname
                        WITH ds_name EQ file_o
                        WITH fl_check EQ ' '.
    *   Open BDC Job
        CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_OPEN'
          EXPORTING
            jobname          = bdcjob
          IMPORTING
            jobcount         = bdcnum
          EXCEPTIONS
            cant_create_job  = 1
            invalid_job_data = 2
            jobname_missing  = 3
            OTHERS           = 4.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
          MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
          WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
        ELSE.
    *     Submit RSBDCSUB to trigger the session in background mode
          SUBMIT rsbdcsub
            VIA  JOB    bdcjob
                 NUMBER bdcnum
            WITH von     = sy-datum
            WITH bis     = sy-datum
            WITH z_verab = 'X'
            WITH logall  = 'X'
            AND RETURN.
          IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    *       Export data to a memory id. This data will be used by the program
    *       that updates the address & email id
            EXPORT t_zzupdate TO SHARED BUFFER indx(st) ID 'MEM1'.
    *       Get Print Parameters
            CALL FUNCTION 'GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS'
              EXPORTING
                no_dialog      = 'X'
              IMPORTING
                valid          = l_valid
                out_parameters = params.
    *       Open a second job to trigger a program which updates addresses & email ids
            CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_OPEN'
              EXPORTING
                jobname          = adrjob
              IMPORTING
                jobcount         = adrnum
              EXCEPTIONS
                cant_create_job  = 1
                invalid_job_data = 2
                jobname_missing  = 3
                OTHERS           = 4.
            IF sy-subrc <> 0.
              MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
              WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
            ELSE.
    *         submit the program to update email id & long addresses
              SUBMIT zfpa_praa_address_update
                     VIA JOB adrjob
                     NUMBER  adrnum
                     TO SAP-SPOOL WITHOUT SPOOL DYNPRO
                         SPOOL PARAMETERS params
                            AND RETURN.
              IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    *           First close the dependent job(address update job). Dependency
    *           is shown by using pred_jobcount & pred_jobname parameters
                CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
                  EXPORTING
                    jobcount             = adrnum
                    jobname              = adrjob
                    pred_jobcount        = bdcnum
                    pred_jobname         = bdcjob
                  EXCEPTIONS
                    cant_start_immediate = 1
                    invalid_startdate    = 2
                    jobname_missing      = 3
                    job_close_failed     = 4
                    job_nosteps          = 5
                    job_notex            = 6
                    lock_failed          = 7
                    invalid_target       = 8
                    OTHERS               = 9.
                IF sy-subrc <> 0.
                  MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                          WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
                ENDIF.
              ENDIF.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
    *     Close the main job(BDC Job)
          CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
            EXPORTING
              jobcount             = bdcnum
              jobname              = bdcjob
              strtimmed            = 'X'
            EXCEPTIONS
              cant_start_immediate = 1
              invalid_startdate    = 2
              jobname_missing      = 3
              job_close_failed     = 4
              job_nosteps          = 5
              job_notex            = 6
              lock_failed          = 7
              invalid_target       = 8
              OTHERS               = 9.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
            MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                    WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    Edited by: kiran dasari on Jul 9, 2010 12:58 AM

    I tried changing the tags..that did not help.
    Since there are two open job statements, I expect to see ONLY two jobs in SM37 and am seeing 3 jobs as mentioned. That is the problem and I wish to know how and from where the 3rd job is getting created.
    Let me try again and paste the code in the tags:
    DATA: bdcjob TYPE tbtcjob-jobname,
          bdcnum TYPE tbtcjob-jobcount,
          adrjob TYPE tbtcjob-jobname,
          adrnum TYPE tbtcjob-jobcount,
          params LIKE pri_params,
          l_valid   TYPE c.
    CHECK fileonly IS INITIAL.
    MOVE: jobname TO bdcjob.
    adrjob = 'A/P_ACCOUNTS_ADDRESS'.
    IF NOT logtable[] IS INITIAL.
      IF NOT testrun IS INITIAL.
    *   If its a test run, Non Batch-Input-Session
        SUBMIT rfbikr00 AND RETURN
                        USER sy-uname
                        WITH ds_name EQ file_o
                        WITH fl_check EQ 'X'.         "X=No Batch-Input
      ELSE.
    *   Create a session which will be processed by a job
        SUBMIT rfbikr00 AND RETURN
                        USER sy-uname
                        WITH ds_name EQ file_o
                        WITH fl_check EQ ' '.
    *   Open BDC Job
        CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_OPEN'
          EXPORTING
            jobname          = bdcjob
          IMPORTING
            jobcount         = bdcnum
          EXCEPTIONS
            cant_create_job  = 1
            invalid_job_data = 2
            jobname_missing  = 3
            OTHERS           = 4.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
          MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
          WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
        ELSE.
    *     Submit RSBDCSUB to trigger the session in background mode
          SUBMIT rsbdcsub
            VIA  JOB    bdcjob
                 NUMBER bdcnum
            WITH von     = sy-datum
            WITH bis     = sy-datum
            WITH z_verab = 'X'
            WITH logall  = 'X'
            AND RETURN.
          IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    *       Export data to a memory id. This data will be used by the program
    *       that updates the address & email id
            EXPORT t_zzupdate TO SHARED BUFFER indx(st) ID 'MEM1'.
    *       Get Print Parameters
            CALL FUNCTION 'GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS'
              EXPORTING
                no_dialog      = 'X'
              IMPORTING
                valid          = l_valid
                out_parameters = params.
    *       Open a second job to trigger a program which updates addresses & email ids
            CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_OPEN'
              EXPORTING
                jobname          = adrjob
              IMPORTING
                jobcount         = adrnum
              EXCEPTIONS
                cant_create_job  = 1
                invalid_job_data = 2
                jobname_missing  = 3
                OTHERS           = 4.
            IF sy-subrc <> 0.
              MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
              WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
            ELSE.
    *         submit the program to update email id & long addresses
              SUBMIT zfpa_praa_address_update
                     VIA JOB adrjob
                     NUMBER  adrnum
                     TO SAP-SPOOL WITHOUT SPOOL DYNPRO
                         SPOOL PARAMETERS params
                            AND RETURN.
              IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    *           First close the dependent job(address update job). Dependency
    *           is shown by using pred_jobcount & pred_jobname parameters
                CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
                  EXPORTING
                    jobcount             = adrnum
                    jobname              = adrjob
                    pred_jobcount        = bdcnum
                    pred_jobname         = bdcjob
                  EXCEPTIONS
                    cant_start_immediate = 1
                    invalid_startdate    = 2
                    jobname_missing      = 3
                    job_close_failed     = 4
                    job_nosteps          = 5
                    job_notex            = 6
                    lock_failed          = 7
                    invalid_target       = 8
                    OTHERS               = 9.
                IF sy-subrc <> 0.
                  MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                          WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
                ENDIF.
              ENDIF.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
    *     Close the main job(BDC Job)
          CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
            EXPORTING
              jobcount             = bdcnum
              jobname              = bdcjob
              strtimmed            = 'X'
            EXCEPTIONS
              cant_start_immediate = 1
              invalid_startdate    = 2
              jobname_missing      = 3
              job_close_failed     = 4
              job_nosteps          = 5
              job_notex            = 6
              lock_failed          = 7
              invalid_target       = 8
              OTHERS               = 9.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
            MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                    WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    ELSEIF NOT t_zzupdate[] IS INITIAL.
    * some other process
    endif.
    Thanks,
    Kiran

  • Two TOs got created for a single Posting Change

    Dear All,
    A material document with movement type 309 got posted in a plant where WM is active.Here the material is moving from one batch to another batch.
    The material document has 100 items.For each item when this movement happens a Posting Change will get created in WM and this will get converted to TO immediately through background job.
    For all the materials except one  this is happening fine, ie if for example if the quantity in the material doc is say 100 PC,then posting change will get created for 100 PC  and this gets converted to single TO with 100 pc
    But for one materal , for a Posting change of qty 90, two TOs got created with same qty ie 90 pcs each.
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.What may be the reasons for this
    Regards
    Shyam

    Dear RK and Arakish,
    Thanks for the replies.
    But i think i need to expalin you the issue in detail.
    Problem Description:
    1) Single Posting change getting converted to two TOs with same quantity each
    2) Unable to go into display mode or change mode of Posting Change because of Error   message. u201CPosting change quantity less than quantity already postedu201D
    Message no. L2145
    Sceanrio:
    Material Document is posted with 309 movement,for moving a single material from single batch to different batches. The material document consists of 140 line items for the same material, but movement happening to 140 different batches.
    For example First line item of the material document corresponds to movement of the material
    From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W01 with quantity 105.438 DIE
    Second line item
    From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W02 with quantity 105.374 DIE
    For each line item, once the movement is posted in IM, corresponding Posting Change get posted in WM with the same Quantity. A background job converts Each Posting Change to single TO with same quantity.
    For example: For the first line item , Posting change 713513 got created with quantity 105.438 DIE which got converted to TO 1057743 with same quantity ie 105.438 DIE
    Issue:
    But only for one line item, the Posting Change with Quantity 90.901 DIE got converted to two TO s of quantity 90.901 each. And the posting change status is Partially Processed
    Because of this, we are not able to go inside the Posting Change neither in the Display mode or Change mode due to the above mentioned error message.
    Please let me know your thoughts on this
    Regards
    Shyam

  • WBS Elements not getting created in ECC Project System from CRM 7.0

    Dear all,
    We are trying to integrate SAP CRM 7.0 with SAP ECC-PS module. The objective is to bring in the marketing plan and elements data from the CRM system, and to create the corresponding WBS in project system. We have done most of the configuration as recommended by SAP in both the systems, and we see that the BDOCS are getting generated and sent to the ECC system. The following steps have been successfully completed:
    1.       Set up the RFC connections between the two systems
    2.       Selected the connection type as Middleware in CRM system.
    3.       Installed the cProject Add on in CRM box.
    4.       Created a project scenario (with project and network profiles) in the PS system and assigned the same in the CRM system.
    5.       The Project Scenario in PS config has the same name as the Project Type in CRM config.
    6.       Created and released the campaign ids being created in the CRM system.
    As already mentioned, we can see that the BDOCS are coming to the ECC system and are getting stored in BDOC_TRACK table. However the issue is that the corresponding WBS elements are not getting generated in the ECC system. Is there anything that that we are missing in the ECC box which would trigger the WBS element creation?
    Request you all to share your inputs which would be immensely beneficial for us in achieving this integration.
    Thanks and Kind Regards,
    Aditya Shrivastava

    Hello Aditya,
    We too are facing this issue.. if you have resolved the issue could you please let us know the solution ?
    Some inputs related to our system,
    We have upgrade from CRM 4.0 to CRM 7.0 SP07 and R/3 backend system is on 4.7 SP27, earlier we have completed the upgrade on sandbox without any issues which was upgrade to CRM 7.0 SP04 but with SP07 we are facing the problem of WBS Element not getting created in R/3.
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sumukh Kapoor.

  • Content Versions getting Created Automatically/Unable to Check-in Originals

    Hello Guru's,
    Everytime when I try to check-in an original and save the DIR, two content versions of the originals is getting created.This is happening only when I do through the PLM Web UI. Hence I am not able to check-in documents through PLM Web UI. I checked all my configuration and I have not enabled the content version neither in DIR status nor in the application type.
    I dont have any issues checking through the CV01N/CV02N. The whitelist set up has been completed as well.
    I have a similar post Unable to checkin  Original in PLM Web UI
    Kindly advise as to what configuration I should check.
    Thanks & Regards
    Jo

    HI Jo,
    based on your description I think that maybe the following SAP notes could be useful for you:
    2064338
    2064099
    2061382
    1269940
    Best regards,
    Christoph

  • Transfer Requirement not getting created

    Hi All,
    My query as below;
    Production order is created using KANBAN (Control Cycle/Supply Area is defined) using classic KANBAN.
    WM is in place and all the setting related to TR/TO creation for WM movement type 103 is in place.
    When i am trying to receive this Production after completion it is not creating the TR/TO, while as material document is getting generated and shows the stock directly in interim storage type 901 without creating TR and TO.
    Further i checked there is indicator in Production order i.e "Kanban indicator" that gets checked automatically when Production order is created using KANBAN Processs and if i remove that indicator forcefully, TR and TO is getting created normally.
    Please provide some inputs where can be the problem and how TR and TO can be created normally eventhough KANBAN indicator is checked in Production order and where i can found the setting related to "KANBAN INDICATOR".
    Appreciate your help.

    Hi Maddy
    Thanks very much for your response.
    1. When you use KANBAN, you define separate KANBAN storage location, which is different from WM-managed replenishment storage locations, and separate KANBAN interim storage area with storage bin.
    Yes different storage location is defined which is not WM-managed in supply area.
    As you said Control Cycle is defined, see if the interface is properly defined for both of these Sloc.
    Where i can check whether interface is properly defined or not.
    2. See if you have defined the KANBAN replenishment strategy with Control type Transfer Requirements from a Storage Location which is being controlled by WM in the Customizing for Production under KANBAN > Replenishment Strategies > Define Stock Transfer Strategies
    Actually for a material two strategies are defined like;
    1) In-house Production strategies-0003-
    supply area is defined with storage location which is IM managed.
    And when this order is completed and i am trying to receive this in WM SLOC (usally whatever SLOC we have defined in supply area it proposes that SLOC at the time of receipt but i am changing this manually to WM managed SLOC) using transaction MIGO, it is directly taking the stock to 901 interim storage type and in total the stock increases but the problem is when TR is not getting created i am not able to take this to the storage bin as per strategies defined.
    2) Stock Transfer Strategies-This is working fine and in that TR/TO is working fine.
    3. For TO to get created automatically by the system from the transfer requirement, see if an indicator Automatic TO creation in the replenishment strategy is set or not. Yes this is set for stock transfer strategies but i didn't find option to check the TO creation automatically for in-house production strategy
    4. Also, check that you have set up a suitable replenishment movement type for KANBAN in the Customizing for Warehouse Management under Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types (i.e.standard is 350 for KANBAN replenishment)-Yes this is also defined correctly.
    Appreciate your more inputs on this.

  • ChaRM transport not getting created

    Hi Experts,
    I am in SP20 EHP1. I am configuring ChRm flow. I have made the copy of SDHF to ZSHF. I have completed all the configurations.  I have made the copy of all the actions & statuses.
    I am having two actions in ZSHF while creating the transport requests as below.
    Option 1: Click the standard action "Set in Development". (copy of standard action). At that time the transport is getting created successfully.
    Option 2: Click the action "Create New Transport request" (Copy of standard action). At that time the transport is NOT getting created. Why i couldn't able create the transport using this copied action? In the transaction data tab ---> Actions tab, the details says that action "Processing HF_EXECUTE_ACTION Is Started" & @5C\QError@     Action could not be successfully executed
    Note:
    But if i use the standard transaction type SDHF, at that time using both standard actions, i could able to create transports.
    Need your valuable input

    Hi,
    Please check for the configurational table for which you are facing problem, its delivery class should be "C" under delivery & maintenance.
    You can get it checked by your ABAP team.
    hope this will help.
    Regards,
    AK

  • Printed colour is different between two elements both created in pages with the same colour

    Hi There,
    I have been having some issues getting a text colour to match a logo (imported in pdf format) - While trying to discover what was happening I created a sample colour of (HSB 189 / 89 / 73) in pages and saved it in my colours palette to test.
    Now if I create some text (in pages) and a shape (also in pages) and colour them from the same colour sample/swatch and print it - the colours are clearly very different, Does pages do some kind of text colour correcting or weirdness that I cant find? Its hard to believe this is the desired workflow and its very anoying.
    PS. I have also tried printing from a pdf and I have the same issues - That said the two colours look identical in pages and the pdf on screen.
    I'd be extremely grateful for any help
    NB I have since read
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/9263007#9263007
    Which although is helpful and may explain the behavious of the imported logo pdf vs the text it doesn't (I dont think) explain how two elements both created in pages using the same colour (from pages) would be dfferent?

    They are both coming out at the exact same colour (CMYK 83, 0, 21, 0) which is correct however they are not the same colours when printed, Im begining to think this is less of a pages thing (as the output is correct) but something is going wrong between pdf/pages and print
    Its not the easiest thing to see so you may have to take my word for it - but the two colours are not the same by quite a long way (Theres way more contrast in real life)
    I think Im ready to admit defeat on this but thanks a bunch for your help!
    Brendan

  • Intercompany Deliveries were created with zero quantity, causing an idoc failure and the remaining delivery too

    Intercompany Deliveries were created with zero quantity, causing an idoc failure and the remaining delivery too
    a. User trying to create delivery but stock not available.
    b. When stock is not there it should show an error message in SAP screen but its not -  like stock not available etc
    c. Fedex gets delivery notice for the delivery; if its more than zero it will create delivery otherwise less than zero it won’t accept.
    d. But issue its creating even its less than zero
    Is there anyone who can help me out...

    When one is created with zero quantities it starts blocking our deliveries from getting through to fedex because deliveries will in doubt have been blocked at fedex. As we process our orders in morning and if there is an STO blocking orders, it will be in afternoon .
    Any suggestions !!!

Maybe you are looking for