ME3400E and bandwidth limiting

Hello,
We recently purchased the ME-3400-EG-12CS-M switch and would like to limit one of the ports to 6meg up and down.
I have the following configuration in place ofr the output.
policy-map out-test
class class-default
shape average 6000000
int g 0/12
service-policy output out-test
Is there a better way of doing this with other commands?
In the docs it says you cannot use the shape on an input policy.
I was looking through the other thread s and saw examples of policy maps with the police command. Would that be better to use?
Finally, the interface has the rate-limit command available. Should I use that?
basically I would like to limit the bandwidth to 6 meg up and down.
Thanks
Don Hickey

The input queue is different than the output queue. The output queue, you can buffer the traffic and shape it to the desire rate, but the input queue, you can not buffer, this is the reason you can only policy/rate-limit the input queue.
Regards,
jerry

Similar Messages

  • "bufferbloat", Airport Extreme, and bandwidth limiting?

    I have a somewhat complex network setup at home.  I have a Cable connection with 20Mbps down, 2 Mbps up, my own Motorola SB6141 cable modem upstream.  Plugged into that, I have a recent model Airport Extreme (802.11ac), and an older Airport Extreme set up with a roaming network.  The primary clients are recent vintage macbooks, iOS devices, with a smattering of other connected devices (DVR, windows, Synology NAS, etc.
    The problem that I'm running into is that network connectivity has lots of issues  if I run a large upload that saturates the outbound connection, e.g. with Dropbox or another online backup tool like Arq.  When that happens, inbound traffic gets super spotty, and things like Netflix become unusable.  peer-to-peer within the network continues to work fine.
    As near as I can tell, these are the classic symptoms of "bufferbloat" and from what I've read, the solution to the problem would be to introduce an outbound bandwidth limit (say at 1.98 Mbps) at the first outbound bottleneck, in this case, at the Airport Extreme (ac) connected to the cable modem.
    Is there any way to do this?  I couldn't find any kind of bandwidth limitation mechanism in the Airport Utility.

    Is there any way to do this?
    Sorry, but no. The AirPorts are all very simple, bare bones routers with a minimum of functionality.

  • Bandwidth limiting with 2504 WLR and 3602E AP

    Hello,
    My QA team needs to test number of special connectivity scenarios where their wireless connection has a limited bandwidth.
    Ideally, I would like to provide them number of SSIDs each of which has different bandwidth limitation.
    But so far I did not find a way to apply any bandwidth limitations to my 2504 Wireless controller and the 3602E AP.
    QoS has only 4 pre-defined modes which can't be set to a specific limit...
    Any help/advise would be highly appreciated!
    Thank you,
    Mark.

    Didnt realize this was not on the 5508, +5 Scott.
    I guess the next best option is to ACL/QOS on the wired side for that subnet in question.
    "Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
    ‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."

  • 2950 or 2060 bandwidth limiting egress and ingress per port

    I am providing an MTU bandwidth and needing a switch that I can set bandwidth limits for each customer. Each customer will have their own port on the switch. Will the Enhanced image 2950 or 2960 limit on egress as well?

    Neither switch supports egress policers. Ingress policers can be configured on the 2960 & the 2950 as long as you have the EI-capable hardware. This is the same for the newer switches - 2960, 2970, 3560 & 3750. The 3550 does allowed egress policers but this is EOS now I think?
    HTH
    Andy

  • Why there is a bandwidth limitations in serial ports

    hi all
    why there is a bandwidth limitations in serial ports ??
    like the highest one is 45 mbps
    but Ethernet ports reach 100 GB !!
    thanks,

    Dear,
    each standard has its own specification about media, connectors and protocols. Depending on the type of media and technologies that ware available when the standard has been defined, a maximum speed has also been defined.  The speed depends on the specific media (copper or optical, twisted pair or coax, cat 5 or cat 6), electrical signals (volts, waveform, clock), distance  between device,.... each protocol defines a maximum speed.  It's true that ethernet protocols have a very high speed but over a copper line they are also limited to 100 meters while other serial protocols, xDSL for example, can transmit up to 20Mbps over copper line over a distance of some kilometre. So speed reduction is often a way to have longer connections.
    Bye,
    enrico
    PS: please rate if useful

  • Is there Bandwidth limitation using IPSec ?

    We have an office in Asia which is connected to our New York location using l2l IPSec through the internet. They claim that they have guaranteed bandwidth of 2MB with their local ISP. They are using MRTG apllication to monitor the bandwith and it is reporting that only 512K is being utilized on the link. They think it is something with the firewall or it is because of the IPSec. We have the IPSec interface set to auto negotiation and the interface stats does not seem to be anything out of the ordinary. What could it be ?

    It could be the application. The latency between Asia and New York might be to high to let the TCP frame size
    ramp up.Try putting some sort of WAN killer behind it and see what your true non-application restricted throughput is.
    To your original question. No, there is no bandwidth limitation in IPSEC. Only hardware limitations of the crypto engin, but that only applies when you get into much higher BW numbers. (Unless you have a 2611 which  does under 1M of 3DES throughput.)
    Another thing your may want to consider is the MTU of the link. Try setting the MTU down to 1360 on the incoming interfaces or  ip tcp adjust-mss 1360. This will prevent the applications from over ramping the TCP windows.

  • Hello,may I ask a question about RTMFP bandwidth limitations

    Hello,rtmfp downloaded from the node, and the upload bandwidth to another node, but the FMS bandwidth limitations Client.getBandwidthLimit () seems to only limit the bandwidth of the server to the client such as RTMP, ask how to limit the bandwidth between nodes, such as RTMFP. MIKE HELP ME THANK YOU!

    Thank you very much Mike

  • Comments on the 285GTX and the Limiter

    I ask if you have the time and are willing, please post your experiences or feedback with the 285GTX and the limiter whether positive or negative. I will forward to the appropriate parties This is not a official Adobe request or anything incase any are wondering.

    Thank you for the feedback. The limiter comes into play on the 285GTX when you add effects to a 4th layer or higher video and leave the tracks active. The yellow line above your sequence will turn red indicating that the effects for that layer will be processed by the CPU and you will have to render out those effects to export them with the sequence. If you monitor your CPU usage once you add effects to a 4th layer or higher, you will see it increases far more for that layer than it did for the previous 3 layers. Basically what the limiter does is force you to render your timeline if you have effects beyond the first 3 layers and increases CPU usage allot more for any effects beyond the 3rd layer. This requires those projects to take more time due to rendering the effects on those layers. For many that may not be an issue but for those with tight deadlines it will be. If you monitor your GPU usage while playing back 3 layers with several effects, you will see the 285GTX is not being pushed hard with just 3 layers. It is not based on the codec of the material. AVCHD and R3D had the same limitation with regards to effects processing and the limiter.
    My request for feedback is to determine if most people are barely pushing their 285GTX cards with 3 layers. Also it is to determine if you would purchase a Quadro card due to the limiter.I will forward this information to our contacts at Nvidia and Adobe to show them the limiter is completely uncalled for. That is the only way we are going to get this changed now or with the Fermi Geforce cards.

  • Set High and Low Limits for an Item

    Hello Experts,
    We want to set up HI and Low Limits in SAP so that they can help us know when we are low on an Item. We would like to see when we are in a sales order and place an order for an Item that falls below the low limit the system will let us know and still allow us to place the order.
    The Low limits have to go on what is in inventory in warehouse 1 not what is on order. We would also like to be able to run a report that allows us to see what items are below the low limit and also which items are close to the low limit. ( Comparison Report).
    Any help in the above scenario would be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Praneeth

    Hi Parneeth,
    have you fill the data in item master data --> inventory tab --> minimum & maximum inventory level.
    u can define this for each warehouse.
    may this help u..
    Thanks,
    JRAJPUT
    Edited by: J2663312 on Jul 14, 2010 12:19 PM

  • MacBook Pro with SSD that has a limited disk space (120GB). Rendering in Project File (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects), it takes huge space and the limited disk space would not be enough for the whole editing.

    I'm using MacBook Pro with 128GB SSD that has a limited disk space. As we know, when rendering in Project File (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects), it takes huge space and the limited disk space would not be enough for the whole editing.
    My question is, Is there any method to get the rendering Projects file saved into an external hard drive which is connected with USB/ Thunderbolt/ Firewire, with huge disk space (eg. 500GB HDD).
    Now, new project created in my Mac is automatically saved in (User/Movies/Final Cut Projects) and my Mac has ran out of space to hold the files.
    Thank you.

    You have at least 3 different ways to show the project library:
    1) Go to WIndow->Show Project Library
    2) Click the button in bottom left of your window: 
    3) Hit the keyboard shortcut (Command-0)
    The project library will be shown, occupying the area where the timeline usually is.
    Your hard disks will be visible. Click the hard disk where you want the new project to reside and hit Cmd-N to create a new project.

  • Customer listing with address data and credit limits

    Hello all,
    I need a report I can download to Excel detailing address data and credit limits by customer.
    Many thanks.

    Hi
    You can not get the report with address details from standard reports. You have to download the address from table level to excel and you can do what ever you want. If you want a special report what you want you have to contact your programmer (ABAP).

  • ERROR-- 9 [Motor unable to stabilize between min and max limits] -- (2708) TEST FAILED

    Re: ERROR -- 9 [Motor unable to stabilize between min and max limits] -- (2708) TEST FAILED
    Please Somebody Tell me What Is The Issue.

    It might be helpful if indicated exactly what you were doing when the error appeared.

  • ASR9K: bandwidth and bandwidth remaining cannot be used together. How to solve the problem to grant a quota and equally assign the remaining quota?

    Hi everyone
    The problem should be trivial. We want to grant a quota to specific classes and use equally the remaining quota of available bandwidth to all the requesting classes. Let's clarify with an example:
    Class 7 ==> priority queue, level 1 with police 20%
    Class 5 ==> priority queue, level 2 with police 40%
    Class 6 ==> CIR 12%
    Class 3 ==> CIR 11%
    Class 2 ==> CIR 8%
    Class 1 ==> CIR 5%
    Class 0 ==> CIR 4%
    To simplify let's suppose that there is no traffic on class 7 and 5 and that all remaining classes are generating traffic at a rate of 300Mbps each. Outgoing interface is 1G so congestion occurs. We want that each class 6,3,2,1,0 receive its granted value (so, respectively, 120M, 110M, 80M, 50M and 40M for a total of 400M) and that the remaining available bandwidth (600M) will be equally assigned, so 120M to each class.
    Documentation from IOS-XR 5.2.2 let's understand that this should be the default behavior but if we run the policy shown below what we get is a weighted assignment of the remaining quota.
    The policy used is the following:
    policy-map TEST-POLICY
     class qos7
      police rate percent 20
      priority level 1
     class qos5
      police rate percent 40
      priority level 2
     class qos6
      bandwidth percent 12
     class qos3
      bandwidth percent 11
     class qos2
      bandwidth percent 8
     class qos1
      bandwidth percent 5
     class qos0
      bandwidth percent 4
     class class-default
     end-policy-map
    The documentation of IOS-XR 5.2.2 states that both "bandwidth percent" and "bandwidth remaining percent" could be used in the same class (which could be a solution to force the requested behavior) but using both generates the following error:
    !!% Both bandwidth and bandwidth-remaining actions cannot be configured together in leaf-level of the queuing hierarchy: InPlace Modify Error: Policy TEST-POLICY: 'qos-ea' detected the 'warning' condition 'Both bandwidth and bandwidth-remaining actions cannot be configured together in leaf-level of the queuing hierarchy'
    How could be solved the problem? Maybe a hierarchical QoS with the granted quota in the parent policy and a "bandwidth remaining percent 20" in the child?

    Hi everyone
    just to provide my contribution, the hierarchical QoS policy works balancing the remaining bandwidth after granting the requested bandwidth (see the policy implemented below). However for priority queues it is granted the policer quota but sending more flows these appears to be unbalanced. So the problem to have both PQ served (in a balanced way between flows) AND have the remaining bandwidth distributed equally remains open ...
    policy-map TEST-POLICY-parent
     class qos6
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
      bandwidth percent 12
     class qos3
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
      bandwidth percent 11
     class qos2
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
      bandwidth percent 8
     class qos1
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
      bandwidth percent 5
     class qos0
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
      bandwidth percent 4
     class class-default
      service-policy TEST-POLICY-child
     end-policy-map
    policy-map TEST-POLICY-child
     class qos7
      police rate percent 20
      priority level 1
     class qos5
      police rate percent 40
      priority level 2
     class qos6
      bandwidth remaining percent 20
     class qos3
      bandwidth remaining percent 20
     class qos2
      bandwidth remaining percent 20
     class qos1
      bandwidth remaining percent 20
     class qos0
      bandwidth remaining percent 20
     class class-default
     end-policy-map

  • GRE tunnel MTU and bandwidth

                       Hi Everyone.
    GRE tunnel from Site A has
    MTU 17916 bytes, BW 100 Kbit, DLY 50000 usec,
    Site B has
    MTU 1514 bytes, BW 9 Kbit, DLY 500000 usec,
    I read that default BW for GRE is 9kbit  but here 1 side has default and other side has 100.
    One side has default MTU other side has 17916
    so is this normal behaviour?
    So need to know the purpose of using MTU 17916 and bandwidth of 100  on Site A?
    Thanks
    Mahesh

    Hello Mahesh,
    The bandwidth and Delay on the Tunnel interface is sometimes used to change the EIGRP metrics to influence routing table. For example if you have two equal cost paths to certain network in your routing table, you can increase the delay on one of the tunnels and make the other tunnel the preffered one. Not sure if this is the case with your setup.. it;s really hard to say without looking at the config.
    As for the MTU, not sure why MTU size is 17916..  1514 make sense but still too big for a GRE tunnel.. I think
    Please rate this post if helpful.. THanks

  • Dashboard - a memory and bandwidth hog?

    Hello everyone,
    This is a general question about widgets really, concerning how much of a memory and bandwidth hog they are.
    I only have a few widgets on my Dashboard, as I'm worried they'll slow my Mac down. Can this happen, and does it only happen when I 'invoke' the Dashboard?
    Also, as some connect to the internet, are they a bandwidth hog? (and again, are they only 'on' when the Dashboard is invoked, or always connected in the background?).
    Many thanks for any advice!
    Ben

    So are these things always running in the background, or only when I chose to bring Dashboard to the fore?The first time you activate Dashboard after log in. Try it. Logout then, back in and check Activity Monitor, then activate Dashboard and check AM.
    With AM you can always keep an eye on your memory and quit apps, even if they may not "force quit". However, the way OS X handles memory you shouldn't have a problem unless you're doing heavy lifting like music/video edit.
    -mj
    [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for