ME53n fixed vendor is getting deleted.

in IW32 we can create the line item for the Purchase requistion when the controlling key is changed to PM03. like wise when the new line item is getting created thru IW32 the previous line item 's vendor no is getting deleted.
in source of supply tab the screen field is getting deleted MEREQ3322-FLIEF only we add the 2nd line item the previous line item is getting deleted. its not happeni

Hi Srivatsan,
1) create a new SC and set on hold.
2) set a breakpoint in the function B45A_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS at the point:
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS'       <----- here
            DESTINATION destination
3) execute the FM BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER with the GUID of the SC (from the step 1)
If you have a dialog user in the bakcend, you can debug the SOS find in the backend. If you just need the result, doubleclick on the sources_of_supply:   
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS'
      DESTINATION destination
      EXPORTING
        material              = material
        mat_grp               = mat_grp
        plant                 = plant
        deliv_date            = deliv_date
        quantity              = quantity
        unit                  = unit
        item_cat              = item_cat
        acctasscat            = acctasscat
        purch_org             = purch_org
        fixed_vend            = fixed_vend
        pckg_no               = pckg_no
        unit_iso              = unit_iso
      TABLES
        sources_of_supply     = sources_of_supply    <--- check the result here
        return                = return
      EXCEPTIONS
        communication_failure = 1  MESSAGE msg_text
        system_failure        = 2  MESSAGE msg_text
        OTHERS                = 3.
Kind regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

  • Fixed vendor getting selected in the Shopping cart by mistake

    Hi,
    We are on SRM_SERVER 550, SP07 and SAP R/3 - 4.7.
    We are on classic scenario.
    Our Scenario: When users order the cart with preferred vendor, the cart will go through approval and once the approval WF gets completed and cart item moves to sourcing cockpit (carry out sourcing). Here the buyers create the PO in the backend.
    But we observed one issue recently. For one particular material id, there is a fixed vendor getting chosen. User enters the preferred vendor, system chooses a fixed vendor--> So the cart doesnt go to sourcing and the PO gets created after the approvals are over.
    I checked if there were any Purchase info records maintained in SAP for this vendor material combination, but there were none.
    There are also no vendor lists maintained.
    Is there any other way a fixed vendor can be picked up in a shopping cart?
    Please let us know .
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan,
    1) create a new SC and set on hold.
    2) set a breakpoint in the function B45A_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS at the point:
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS'       <----- here
                DESTINATION destination
    3) execute the FM BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER with the GUID of the SC (from the step 1)
    If you have a dialog user in the bakcend, you can debug the SOS find in the backend. If you just need the result, doubleclick on the sources_of_supply:   
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS'
          DESTINATION destination
          EXPORTING
            material              = material
            mat_grp               = mat_grp
            plant                 = plant
            deliv_date            = deliv_date
            quantity              = quantity
            unit                  = unit
            item_cat              = item_cat
            acctasscat            = acctasscat
            purch_org             = purch_org
            fixed_vend            = fixed_vend
            pckg_no               = pckg_no
            unit_iso              = unit_iso
          TABLES
            sources_of_supply     = sources_of_supply    <--- check the result here
            return                = return
          EXCEPTIONS
            communication_failure = 1  MESSAGE msg_text
            system_failure        = 2  MESSAGE msg_text
            OTHERS                = 3.
    Kind regards,
    Peter

  • Portal Issue- All the requistion is getting a fixed vendor

    Hi All,
    In Portal, whenever I created a requistion and assigned a 'Desired vendor' . But after I save and go on to see the requistion, a fixed vendor gets assigned to it.Not only that a scheduling agreement also gets assigned to it even though that agreement has nothing to do with that requistion.
    Kindly give your feedback on this one ASAP...I even checked in the R/3 system but over there also couldn't find anything on its happening.
    Thanks,
    Swati.

    Hi,
    Fixed vendor is not a flag so i don't think the solution is on the personal settings.
    Here you have some tip's:
    - Before the actual conversion of a purchase requisition item, you can assign a source of 
    supply (info record, outline agreement or scheduling agreement) to the item. So the schudling agreement is a possible source of supply!!
    - You uset the Regular Vendor indicator in the info record to specify that a material is to
      be procured client-wide from this vendor. The regular vendor is thus comparable with
      the fixed vendor that can be specified in the source list for the lower organizational level  
      plant. You should use the regular vendor only if you have nothing other than info  
      records stored in the system for a material and if you prefer not to create a source list
      to control the sourced determination process.
    Check if in the scheduling agreement used in the PReq there is and info record. I so check regular vendor.
    Regards,
    Fernando

  • Someone hacked my computer and set up a new administrative account by re-registering my computer. I can not access this account nor delete it. How can I fix this and get my computer back to the way it was?

    Someone hacked my computer and set up a new administrative account by re-registering my computer. I can not access this account nor delete it. How can I fix this and get my computer back to the way it was? And also prevent this from being able to happen again. I have the link the kid used (http://www.ihackintosh.com/2009/05/how-to-hack-the-user-password-in-mac-os-x-wit hout-an-os-x-cd/) Apparently he used hack 2. HELP PLEASE!

    Not sure why you can't delete that account. If you have admin privileges, you should be able to. Sounds like you only removed the Home Folder for that account.
    You should highlight/select the account you want to remove and then click the minus button. Might need to unlock the padlock with your admin password.
    Have a look at these articles from Apple, if necessary.
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/8235.html
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/8162.html
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1399

  • Deletion of Preferred or Fixed Vendor when we copy the SC from Old SC's

    Hey SRM Experts,
    When we copy the SC from the Old SC's, Is it possible to delete only the Preferred or Fixed Vendor Information and all other information should be copied to the new SC?
    Thanks for your input on this. Helpful answers will be rewarded.
    MP

    Hi,
    You can modify the SC data using the BADI "BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI".In the BADi,based on the action "COPY"(Check SY-UCOMM),you can delete the value for the vendor in the SC data.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • I have iphone5 and updated to ios7 but few contacts are getting deleted..how to fix this?

    i have iphone5 and updated to ios7 but few contacts are getting deleted..how to fix this?

    So, you do not see any fonts bold that shouldn't be bold?
    What are your current default font settings?
    If you have increased the minimum font size then try the default setting "none" as a (too) high value can cause issues.
    *Tools > Options > Content : Fonts & Colors > Advanced > Minimum Font Size (none)
    Make sure that you allow websites to choose their fonts.
    *Tools > Options > Content : Fonts & Colors > Advanced > [X] "Allow pages to choose their own fonts, instead of my selections above"
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Changing+fonts+and+colors
    It is better not to increase the minimum font size in case you need a larger font, but use an extension to set the default page zoom to prevent issues with overlapping text.

  • I purchase songs from Itunes and as soon as I sync my phone, the song gets deleted. Does anyone else have this problem or know how to fix it?

    I purchase songs from Itunes and as soon as I sync my phone, the song gets deleted. Does anyone else have this problem or know how to fix it?

    I have random songs that a have paid for but they just disappear, or cannot be downloaded and so on. Sometimes they are indexed wrongly, and can't be found because of that, no work around because also the search function of itunes has gotten totally unusable. Not much fun to be an apple user anymore. I once used to be a very loyal user. My first apple was a Macintosh SE and an image writer II.

  • How does a catalogue vendor gets charactarized as a fixed vendor in SRM?

    Dear Expters,
    can you please help me understand the standard SRM behaviour (7.0, CS) for the following point:
    When a catlogue item is purchased from a third party catalogue platfrom, than the vendor of this catalogue item is displayed as a fixed vendor in the EBP shopping cart, afer the return from the catalogue platform from SRM.
    How exactly does the charactarization of the vendor as fixed vendor happens?
    I mean, does it happen in a way that during the return from the catalogue platform to SRM, the catalogue platform sends the
    content 000019 into the SRM field partner_fct?
    Or is the approach completely different and it is done somehow in a way that SRM receives that data from the catalogue platform, than for example understands somehow that this position was sent from a catalogue and based on that decides that the vendor should have the "fixed vendor" partner function?
    Thank you.

    Hello,
    The SRM system behaves as described below:                                                                               
    Limit item:                                                               
    If a SC is created with a vendor, it is considered as a "Fixed Vendor".                                                                               
    Free text item:                                                           
    If a SC is created with vendor, it is considered as a "Preferred Vendor".                                                                               
    Catalog items:                                                            
    When an item is added from a catalog to SC, the vendor is always considered as "Fixed vendor".                                                                               
    It is possible to change the "Preferred Vendor" to "Fixed Vendor" through BADI implementation BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI~BBP_SC_CHANGE.
    Anyway, if you create a cart using catalog item, vendor will always be considered as fixed.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • Fixed vendor in non-catalog PO

    Hi,
    We are facing some strange issue. We have a field "Vendor" in Basic data and Source of Supply tab in shopping cart. This would have value only in case of catalog item or there is contract or any other source of supply assigned to that item. If there is no source of supply then this field will not even displayed in these tabs.
    But in our case, if we enter a preferred vendor in source of supply tab, then during the course of approval somehow the "fixed vendor" gets udpated. Because of that, the PO gets automatically created (ext classic) without the knowledge of the buyer.
    In shopping cart, we could see both the partner functions 39 and 19. This is happening very rarely (like one in 1000 shopping carts) but the impact is very big as the POs are being sent to vendor before buyer reviewing that.
    Has anyone came across this issue? Can you plz help to fix this? we are in SRM 4.0
    Thanks,
    Arun

    Thanks Muthu and Jay.
    We tried two changes through this BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI.
    Change 1 - Deleting the line from lt_partner table where partner_fct = 0000019 and then move lt_partner to et_partner, which is the output parameter of the badi.
    In this change, we could able to delete that specific line from lt_partner when partner_fct = 19 and the output parameter et_partner also does not have that line. We checked this at the end of the doc-change badi. But once the shopping cart is ordered, the deleted line is still there. Are we missing something ?
    Change 2 - If partner_fct = 0000019 , then make it as partner_fct = 0000039 and then move lt_partner to et_partner
    In this case also, it is changing the partner_fct to 39 but the shopping cart is not getting ordered. It is giving the message "PArtner function may not be changed" with message type A.
    Can you please advise, if we are missing something here?
    Thanks
    Arun

  • Order category BF not getting deleted in APO

    Hi Experts,
    I have a situation where the material is already deleted in ECC (hence no longer existing), but the product is existing in APO and we need to delete this in APO. To do this, we need to delete the dependent orders for that product/location first and then other dependencies.
    There are few orders for the prod/loc as confirmed purchase orders (ord cat BF). These orders are now PP/DS orders with status as PP firmed, output firmed and date fixed.
    I have tried the two programs- /sapapo/rlcdelete and /sapapo/delete_pp_order, but system is not picking up the orders to delete.
    The system shows as message as " No deletion of converted orders in active version"
    As I said earlier, the product is no longer existing in ECC, hence I can not delete the orders from there.
    Is there any other way to achieve this? Is there any BADI to do this in APO?
    Regards
    Manotosh

    Hi
    You can use /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER report for deleting these orders.
    Execute the this report, mention all the products for which you want to delete the order and execute it. It might give the message as orders will not get deleted as inactive in APO.
    Go back please enter as DEL_EXECU, in the place where we use to enter the T-codes and enter and than again execute the report. It will delete the orders.
    You can also try /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL report.
    Thanks
    Amol

  • Past due PurRqs are getting deleted in APO but not getting deletd in R3

    Hi folks,
    We have a daily job, which runs at 18:00 hrs in the evening everyday in the APO Production System.The job is to delete all past due Purchase Requisitions for last 2 years (job & variant details are mentioned below) All the past due PurRqs are getting deleted from APO, which we have cross-cheked in RRP3 view many times.
    However the same is not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end- user is getting confused & hassled by this list of old PurRqs which is visible in R3 through MD04 t-code.
    Please suggest remedial/corrective actions to get this issue sorted.
    The job details for the deletion of past purchase requisitions.
    The job is run with the following variant details:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ABAP Program name :/SAPAPO/RLCDELETE
    VARIANT Details
    Select Object-> By Categories ->Category = AG (PurRqs in R3)
    Manual Selection-> Version =000; Product = (blank); Location = List ofall locations;
    Fixed Order (ticked)
    Period = 14.03.2009 to 14.03.2011 {All PurRqs in these period shouldget deleted in APO as well as R3}
    Settings-> Delete Transaction Data ->In R3 & APO (ticked)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Past due PurRqs are not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end-user is getting confused & hassled resulting in loss of productive time & generation of erroneous planning which is negatively impacting Business.
    Pls suggest some remedy for this.
    MMTIA
    Kumar
    Edited by: Blue Lotus on Mar 14, 2011 5:51 PM

    Do you run the CCR on a daily basis. If so do you see the "reqs missing in R/3" in the CCR ?
    Also what is your transfer setting ? Meaning the transfer from APO to R/3 configuration  - is it immediate or change pointer based ? check that also
    Thanks
    Aparna

  • Report on PO's raised for vendors other than fixed vendor

    Hi
    Is there any report which gives list of PO's which are raised for vendors other than fixed vendors
    We are maintaining sourcelist
    we need a helath report which gives list of POs in which buyer used other than fixed vendor
    Thanks

    hi,
    In sap there is no one common report availlable for this. you want to develop a customized report for this.alternate solution is  get the one time vendor list in MKVZ trx. pass the values in me1l trx where you can get the desired result.
    Regards,
    velu

  • Is it not possible to create a PR with Fixed vendor without an Info-record

    Hi,
    We have a requirement in which data necessary for PR(Purchase Requisition) creation ( replenishment orders ) comes from a legacy system and we use the BAPI -BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR's.
    The problem is when we try to create PR by using plant in the field fixed vendor present in Source of Supply tab, we are getting the error message, "Inforecord for Vendor xxx and material xxxx does not exist ". This message is due to the plant given in fixed vendor field and missing info records. And we always use only "plant" as fixed vendor.
    Is there any way to avoid the determination of info records based on fixed vendor?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Edited by: Dagny on Aug 28, 2009 3:01 PM
    Edited by: Dagny on Aug 28, 2009 4:30 PM
    Edited by: Dagny on Aug 31, 2009 11:09 AM

    Kurt Lang wrote:
    It is more than well known that Flash is not supported on the iPad or iPhone. Adobe officially threw in the towel even attempting to get a working player for mobile devices that one, doesn't chew up battery life; two, doesn't eat up so many system resources.
    The focus now is on Adobe AIR and HTML5. So don't expect to ever see Flash for the iPad.
    I don't understand the reply. This is the Power Mac forum. Is the real problem finding a PowerPC version of Flash and Adobe Reader? If so, Adobe dropped Flash support for PowerPC in February.
    http://lowendmac.com/ed/bashur/11db/powerpc-flash-support.html
    How evil is this? Well, Apple itself no longer supports PowerPC in its last two major OSs, 10.6 and 10.7. So the problem here is a very old Mac.
    There is an Adobe Reader for PowerPC.
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5245
    Adobe kept putting out PowerPC updates longer than Apple did!
    Also, Adobe Reader is available for iOS, if that was part of the original question.

  • Finding of fixed vendor while creation of the sales order

    i want to find the fixed vendor (FLIEF) from EBAN ,<b>before saving the sales order</b>,
    for that i need to pass BANFN( purchase request no) BNFPO(purchase request item no), into EBAN ,which i got from VBEP table  .
       i used user-exit (userexit_save_document) which is in MV45AFZZ (include programming). i'm getting BANFN and BNFPO from XVBEP and there is no data in EBAN.help me any other method is there to find these values. like any <b>user_exit</b> or <b>bapi</b> or <b>badi</b>

    Hi Krishna Murali,
    do u want to make mandatory fixed vendor in sales order ,if yes
    u can fix by using the incompletion procedure.
    hope it helps, if u have have any query , come to me
    Thanks&Regards
    Venkat.Dhanemkula

  • Changing preferred vendor to fixed vendor in SRM PO- no currency conversion

    Hi All,
    We are on SRM_SERVER 550, SP11, ECS scenario.
    Users create carts where they enter preferred vendor.
    After approval we found that the PO's were created only in "Held" Status.
    So we did a conversion of the preferred vendor (PF 39) to Fixed vendor (PF 19) during PO creation using BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI- BBP_PO_CHANGE.
    We also implemented BBP_GROUP_LOC_PO,GROUP_PO so that all items with same preferred vendor are grouped into a single PO.
    We observed that PO is now getting created in ordered status, where the preferred vendor is getting converted to fixed vendor as per our code change. But we also found a problem- that the line item price doesnt get converted to Vendor order currency after the Po is created. For ex: If line item price is 10 GBP and Vendor order currency is EUR, the line item price in the PO shows 10 EUR. The currency conversion fro GBP to EUR does not happen.
    This does not happen for catalog items/PO's where the cart comes with a fixed vendor (PF 19).
    So there surely seems to be something missing in our code for converting Preferred vendor to fixed vendor which is preventing/not converting the currency as well.
    Please find below the code we are using in DOC_CHANGE_BADI for PO, is there any step in this which is causing the currency conversion to be skipped?
    CONSTANTS:C_FIXED_VENDOR   TYPE BBP_PDS_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT
                           VALUE '00000019',
               C_PREFERRED_VEND TYPE BBP_PDS_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT
                           VALUE '00000039'.
       READ TABLE ET_PARTNER INTO LS_PARTNER WITH KEY
                             P_GUID      = IS_HEADER-GUID
                             PARTNER_FCT = C_FIXED_VENDOR.
       IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
       READ TABLE ET_PARTNER INTO LS_PARTNER WITH KEY
                             P_GUID      = IS_HEADER-GUID
                             PARTNER_FCT = C_PREFERRED_VEND.
        IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
          CLEAR IDX.
          IDX = SY-TABIX.
          MOVE C_FIXED_VENDOR TO LS_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT.
       MODIFY ET_PARTNER INDEX IDX FROM LS_PARTNER TRANSPORTING PARTNER_FCT.
       ENDIF.
       ENDIF.
    Regardas,
    Srivatsan

    there is nothing in your code which prevents the conversion between the two currencies,
    it can be the following reason
    1) system as standard is not performing the conversion.
    2) conversion factors are not maintained (or) conversion factors are maintained and the expiry date for the conversion factors has passed.

Maybe you are looking for