Meeting Place 8- Ports default behavior

Hi,
In MP8 when I schedule a meeting with 5 audio ports, how can I restrict this meeting to use only 5 ports and not more than that, considering some ports are not reserved in any meeting.
I also wish to know the default behavior of ports in MP8. Is it available on docwiki ?
Thanks
spvaidya

Hello
The MP8 system uses Audio Floater ports and Overbook ports to allocate extra/unexpected users in meetings.
If you set these values to 0, you will configure the system to not allow extra users in the meeting once you have reached the max. number of ports allocated for that meeting.
Audio floater ports
Applies to scheduled meeting resource allocation only. Number of voice ports that are reserved as floater ports. You use floater ports for any scheduled meeting to accommodate unanticipated additional participants. Configuring voice floater ports reduces the number of ports that are available for scheduling meetings. Voice floater ports are also used by meeting recordings. See Audio and Video Recording Resources and Port Usage. Restrictions:
This number cannot exceed the value of the Audio licensed ports field. Changing the licenses might affect the upper and lower limits for this parameter.
For recommendations for determining the number of floater ports, see the Planning Guide for Cisco Unified MeetingPlace at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/
products/sw/ps5664/ps5669/products_implementation_design_guides_list.html. Default: 2
Audio overbook ports
Applies to scheduled meeting resource allocation only. Number of voice ports to allow for scheduled meetings that exceed the number of available voice ports on the system. Configuring voice overbook ports increases the risk of users being unable to attend scheduled meetings. If you use this feature, you assume that users who are scheduled to attend meetings do not always attend, leaving their reserved voice ports unused. Once all voice ports are in use, other users who try to attend a voice meeting will not be able to get through. Restrictions:
This number cannot exceed twice the value of the Audio licensed ports field. Changing the licenses might affect the upper and lower limits for this parameter.
For recommendations for determining the number of overbook ports, see the Planning Guide for Cisco Unified MeetingPlace at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/
products/sw/ps5664/ps5669/products_implementation_design_guides_list.html. Default: 0
Check this docwiki guide to check the Capacity Planning:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_Release_8.0_--_Planning_the_Capacity_of_your_Cisco_Unified_MeetingPlace_System
Thanks
Fernando

Similar Messages

Meeting Place 8.5 Active users being moved to default group

Customer has multiple groups set up in Meeting Place 8.5 server which is getting Users from a Call Manager (8.5).
Intermittantly different Users are moved from their correct group into default group. Random occurance.
Users have not changed anything in their profile. This has happened several times in the past. Customer has to manually go in and move the User back into the correct group. New install of MP 8.5. Ideas appreciated.
Thank you.

All - what have discoverd is Meeting Place node is going away. Meetings will be held in Webex moving forward and MP should be used as an on prem audio bridge only. Some new WebEx solutions are on the roadmap.

Meeting Request Default Behavior

Hi,
I am not sure that this is a issue or default behavior of meeting request in outlook, please suggest the best one.
"When a Meeting attendee FWDs a message to another attendee of the same meeting and that attendee replies, the reply comes from the meeting originator not the attendee that FWD the message."
Regards Sunny Chauhan

Hi,
Agreed. For the meeting request forward, it is by default that the user who forwards the meeting request is only on behalf of the organizer.
When the meeting request is forwarded, the meeting organizer will receive a Meeting Forward Notification mail from the user forwarding the meeting request at the same time.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Help! ADF default behavior rejected by end users...

Hi,
We have built an ADF 11g application during the past months. Last week we had our first user acceptance test with a small group of users. The users were very satisfied about the nice looks of the screens. But they had quite a lot of issues with the default behavior of ADF. I'll provide a list of the most important issues below. I hope more people here at OTN have experienced these issues and perhaps have some workarounds. And perhaps Oracle can use lists like this to improve the next version of ADF...
<ol><li>Multi record edit We have a lot of multi record edit screens. These are all editable tables. Those tables have the following problems:
<ol type="a"><li>Whenever a partial refresh occurs, the whole table gets reloaded. This takes some time, which is uncomfortable. But the main problem here is that the table does not preserve the scroll bar position. The situation can be improved a little bit by setting the <tt>displayRow</tt> attribute to <tt>"selected"</tt> on the table. This will cause the table to show the selected record at the top of the view port after a refresh. But this still confuses the end users. In their experience the records are randomly jumping around.</li>
<li>Records are not always inserted at the bottom. (In fact, they are inserted above the selected record.) End users simply expect records to be inserted at the bottom of the table, no matter what. And I can't disagree with them. Isn't there a setting to achieve this in ADF?</li>
<li>Whenever the user navigates to another record in the editable table, all validation rules on the record he navigates from are fired. That means he cannot leave a required field empty to fill it later. The end users say this is very annoying. We would like to delay all validation until the user presses the Commit button. But as far as I know this is not possible, is it?</li>
<li>The selected record position is not preserved on a full refresh. Our Commit button forces a full refresh of the page. This sounds like a sensible choice to me. However, users tend to click on Commit quite often. But after a full refresh of the page, the currently selected record in a record set is always reset to the first record in the set. In a large data table, this annoys the users very much. Isn't it possible to preserve the selected record over a full refresh?</ol>
<li>Annoying validation errors Many end users are annoyed by the somewhat "persistent" validation error messages. In a larger form or an editable table, users sometimes want to ignore an error and first enter other data, before correcting the error. This is hardly possible, because ADF sets the input focus to fields with errors and keeps popping up windows with a list of fields that have errors. We would like to make the validation less "aggressive". It is okay to give a field a red border if it contains an error. But leave the input focus where it is. And don't show any popup until the user presses the Commit button. And even then show the popup window only once.</li>
<li>ADF BC caching and business rules in the database We have some business rules in our database that automatically fill some fields with default values. We have e.g. a master-details relation, where a value in the master record is calculated based on the values of the detail records. We have set the calculated field in the master record to "refresh after update" and "refresh after insert". Sometimes the value of the field gets refreshed, but sometimes not. Users know that the field should be calculated by "the system", and are asking if they did something wrong if it doesn't. I know we could do the calculation in ADF, but our policy is to have all business rules in the database and to not repeat ourselves (DRY). Is there another way to guarantee that the calculated value in the master record gets updated after an update or insert of one or more detail records?</li>
<li>Partial refresh loses data If a field causes a partial submit to occur, fields in the same record that were not (partial) submitted before lose their data. This forces us to enable partial submit on all fields. But that causes a delay after moving the focus to the next field and validations to be fired too early.</li>
</ol>
I've numbered the items above, please use these number as a reference if you're posting an answer to a specific question.
Please let me know any solution, even if it is only a partial solution. We've a nasty situation now. Our application is (nearly) finished, but it is blocked for production by the users because of the behavior of the ADF framework, on which we have very little influence. We can't blame the users for that, most of their criticism is fully justified. So we have to come up with a good solution for these issues before we can go to production. So any help would be highly appreciated!
Best regards,
Bart Kummel
PS.
We're using JDeveloper/ADF 11.1.1.1.0, we deploy to a WebLogic 10.3.1 server and we have an Oracle 10g database. We're using the full ADF stack: ADF Business Components, ADF Bindings and ADF Faces.

Hi Bart,
I can answer for few of your questions.
Bart Kummel wrote:
Hi,
We have built an ADF 11g application during the past months. Last week we had our first user acceptance test with a small group of users. The users were very satisfied about the nice looks of the screens. But they had quite a lot of issues with the default behavior of ADF. I'll provide a list of the most important issues below. I hope more people here at OTN have experienced these issues and perhaps have some workarounds. And perhaps Oracle can use lists like this to improve the next version of ADF...
<ol><li>Multi record edit We have a lot of multi record edit screens. These are all editable tables. Those tables have the following problems:
<ol type="a"><li>Whenever a partial refresh occurs, the whole table gets reloaded. This takes some time, which is uncomfortable. But the main problem here is that the table does not preserve the scroll bar position. The situation can be improved a little bit by setting the <tt>displayRow</tt> attribute to <tt>"selected"</tt> on the table. This will cause the table to show the selected record at the top of the view port after a refresh. But this still confuses the end users. In their experience the records are randomly jumping around.</li>You can set the fetchSize in the iterator to a minimum value (Say if you are displaying 20 records in the table at a time, you can set the fetchSize to 20, so that, it will fetch only 20 records at a time, and the remaining records on demand basis, i.e they will be fetched when you scroll in the table).
<li>Records are not always inserted at the bottom. (In fact, they are inserted above the selected record.) End users simply expect records to be inserted at the bottom of the table, no matter what. And I can't disagree with them. Isn't there a setting to achieve this in ADF?</li>I suppose you are using the default createInsert operation. You can write your own method instead of the default createInsert, which would have something like
public void customCreateInsert(){
vo.last();
vo.createInsert();
}You can expose this method as method action and use it in place of default CreateInsert.
<li>Whenever the user navigates to another record in the editable table, all validation rules on the record he navigates from are fired. That means he cannot leave a required field empty to fill it later. The end users say this is very annoying. We would like to delay all validation until the user presses the Commit button. But as far as I know this is not possible, is it?</li>You can set the immediate property to true for the column for which you want to skip the validation. However, the validation will fire when you submit / commit the changes (which is expected).
<li>The selected record position is not preserved on a full refresh. Our Commit button forces a full refresh of the page. This sounds like a sensible choice to me. However, users tend to click on Commit quite often. But after a full refresh of the page, the currently selected record in a record set is always reset to the first record in the set. In a large data table, this annoys the users very much. Isn't it possible to preserve the selected record over a full refresh?</ol>Again, you can have a custom method, which would get the current row, commit the transaction and do a setCurrentRowWithKey to point to the last selected record after commit.
<li>Annoying validation errors Many end users are annoyed by the somewhat "persistent" validation error messages. In a larger form or an editable table, users sometimes want to ignore an error and first enter other data, before correcting the error. This is hardly possible, because ADF sets the input focus to fields with errors and keeps popping up windows with a list of fields that have errors. We would like to make the validation less "aggressive". It is okay to give a field a red border if it contains an error. But leave the input focus where it is. And don't show any popup until the user presses the Commit button. And even then show the popup window only once.</li>You can add a af:messages tag in the top and set globalOnly to true. Also, set the immediate property for the items to skip the validation when they tab out.
<li>ADF BC caching and business rules in the database We have some business rules in our database that automatically fill some fields with default values. We have e.g. a master-details relation, where a value in the master record is calculated based on the values of the detail records. We have set the calculated field in the master record to "refresh after update" and "refresh after insert". Sometimes the value of the field gets refreshed, but sometimes not. Users know that the field should be calculated by "the system", and are asking if they did something wrong if it doesn't. I know we could do the calculation in ADF, but our policy is to have all business rules in the database and to not repeat ourselves (DRY). Is there another way to guarantee that the calculated value in the master record gets updated after an update or insert of one or more detail records?</li>We need some more information. Do you see any "pattern" on which this things occur?
-Arun

How to change host name and domain name in installed Cisco Meeting Place Express 2.0?

Hi
I have Cisco Meeting Place Express 2.0 installed on server. Meting Place uses Linux (Red Hat) as base operation system. Please tell me how I can change host name and domain name for Meeting Place Express application to integrate it into corporate domain infrastructure.
Thanks in advance!!!
Sincerely yours
Sergey Bondarenko

Hi
Thanks for your attention for my humble problem.
I have performed Meeting Place Express configuration through the “net” command.
But now unfortunately I can't connect to meeting place through web browser. I just get blank page.
Though I can reach the server with help of ssh. I think my DNS works properly because I can resolve the ip address of cumpxvoice .uclab.com and cumpxweb. uclab.com with help of dig command.
Have you any idea?
A lot of thanks in advance!!
Sincerely yours Sergey Bondarenko
Here I have printed the net configuration output of Cisco meeting Place Express:
[root@cumpxvoice root]# net
This is the MeetingPlace Express network configuration utility.
Up to the point where you save changes, it is safe to hit ^C to get
out at any time, in which case nothing will have changed.
1) List current configuration
2) Configure Ethernet port 1
3) Configure Ethernet port 2
4) Configure service bindings
5) Set host names
6) Set domain name
7) Configure DNS service
8) Configure NTP service
9) Configure routing
10) Done
Select: 1
Primary/audio host name: cumpxvoice
HTTP host name:          cumpxvoice
RTMP host name:          cumpxweb
Domain name:             uclab.com
Service bindings:
Audio:                   port 1 (eth0)
Web browsing (HTTP):     port 1 (eth0)
Web conferencing (RTMP): port 2 (eth1)
Port 1 (device eth0):
IP Address:      10.62.60.116
Network mask:    255.255.255.0
Default gateway: 10.62.60.1
Link setting:    autoneg on
Port 2 (device eth1):
IP Address:      10.62.60.117
Network mask:    255.255.255.0
Default gateway: 10.62.60.1
Link setting:    autoneg on
Static routes:
Destination      Gateway          Network mask     Port
0.0.0.0          10.62.60.1       0.0.0.0          1
DNS Servers:
10.62.60.115
10.0.1.4

Cisco Meeting Place Express 2.0 Exchange Server Configuration error.

Hi
I have Cisco Meeting Place Express 2.0 installed on server. Meting Place uses Linux (Red Hat) as base operation system.
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Обычная таблица";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
I have a problem with Cisco Meeting Place Express and Exchange Server synchronizing.
The Cisco Meeting Place Settings are
Exchange Server
Hostname *
Language* de_DE en_AU en_GB en_US fr_CA fr_FR
SSL   enabled * true false
Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Express   Mailbox Account
Windows   domain *
Username *
Password *
Password   confirm *
E-mail   address *
Mailbox   maintenance interval (days) *
Mailbox   maintenance cutover (days) *
When I type the button test, I receive “Authentication error. Check the authenticated access to the Exchange Server for Microsoft NTLM authentication scheme.”
My Exchange Server is synchronized with MS Active Directory. As far as I know, Kerberous is used for authentication. So, how can I enable NTLM authentication scheme on AD? Are there any other options for Cisco MPE and Exchange synchronization?
Thanks for help
Sincerely yours
Sergey Bondarenko

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Обычная таблица";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
Thanks a lot.
I have corrected domain name in configuration after your advice. Cisco MPE Exchange Configuration is working very well now. I’m able to start a meeting from the outlook calendar and send messages to meeting participants.
Thank you very march for your assistance!
Sincerely yours
Sergey Bondarenko

Meeting Place WebEx 8.0 reservationless audio meeting ID issue

We have just converted from Meeting Place Express 2.x to Meeting Place WebEx 8.0 with Type II scheduling. Since this configuration is reservationless, the audio meeting ID is the user's extension by default and it appears there is no way to change the system from always using the same audio meeting ID for the same user. Our issue is that we have many executive admins who book multiple meetings (sometimes overlapping, sometimes back-to-back) and are now having issues. Since the meetings all share the same audio ID, the meetings are stepping on top of one another. Is there some way to allow the users to change the audio ID per meeting or have the system generate an ID for the audio meeting to prevent this issue?

Hi Saurabh,
MCS7835-I3 is supported by MeetingPlace 8.5 for Audio Only solution. You will need to perform the firmware upgrade before installing 8.5, but all that is documented in the installation documentation.
Keep in mind that from MP8.0 to MP8.5, you are transitioning via migration and not via upgrade. This will require taking migration files from MP8.0 server, performing a firmware update, doing a clean installation of MP8.5 and then restoring from migration files.
In order to obtain MP8.5 installation DVD, you have to purchase the MP8.5 upgrade that is usually included in UCSS/ESW contract. If that expired, you will have to consult with your Cisco Account Team on what is the best way to proceed.
Finally, in MP8.0 licensing is port based, while in MP8.5 licensing is host based. Hence, you will need to do a license conversion after migration is completed. Licensing TAC can help you with that.
Here are some useful documents about this:
INSTALLATION instructions:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/meetingplace/8_5/english/administration/inst_order.html
MIGRATION instructions:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/meetingplace/8_5/english/administration/upgrading_software.html
I hope this will help you.
-Dejan

Time issue while scheduling meeting in meeting place 8.0

Dear Team,
I am very new to Meeting Place system. Here we have version 8.0 and i am facing below issue.
While scheduling meeting when i have mentioned start time as 13.30 and end after 30 min.
but the issue is user can join the meeting before 13.30 and thats is security issue
i would like to know how to restict this. my requiremnt is user can only join before 10 min.
Regards
Hari

Hi Hari,
Is you MeetingPlace 8.0 integrated with WebEx, or it is an Audio Only solution?
If you are scheduling meetings in Audio Only solution, you can specify "Early meeting start (minutes)" variable in System Configuration > Meeting Configuration.
If you have WebEx integration and WebEx scheduling, you would need to specify a default "Join before host", but every host would have to configure that for their own profile.
-Dejan

Time issue iwhile scheduling meeting in meeting place 8.0

Dear Team,
I am very new to Meeting Place system. Here we have version 8.0 and i am facing below issue.
While scheduling meeting when i have mentioned start time as 13.30 and end after 30 min.
but the issue is user can join the meeting before 13.30 and thats is security issue
i would like to know how to restict this. my requiremnt is user can only join before 10 min.
Please help

Hi Hari,
Is you MeetingPlace 8.0 integrated with WebEx, or it is an Audio Only solution?
If you are scheduling meetings in Audio Only solution, you can specify "Early meeting start (minutes)" variable in System Configuration > Meeting Configuration.
If you have WebEx integration and WebEx scheduling, you would need to specify a default "Join before host", but every host would have to configure that for their own profile.
-Dejan

Hi, could you please answer question in terms of Meeting Place?

Hi, I am working in a trouble shooting of meeting place, I got very confused these 2 question:
1) in a real conferencing senario, does each audio stream from a participant should go to Audio Blade (Media server) in order to mix together. if so and we have voice gateway conference resource, then what is it for ? I mean no use voice gateway DSP farm to setup a conference?
2) in version V7, each audio blade has 250 session ports ( G711 audio codec only), and for instance we have 2 blades, then it mean that all the participants all of the meeting in a same time should be no more than 500 ?
3) the audiao blade working mode in a shared pool ? or other machanism?
thanks in advance!

Good morning Fnu,
tons thanks to you, right not I get more clear of MP;
could you please correct me if I am wrong?
1) 1 ports means 1 session of audio, then if I have total 500 ports, then I can shedule 2 meetings, each has 250 participants, or I can shedule 100 meetings, each has 5 participants, correct?
2) when I schedule a meeting, then I wll reserving dedicated resouces on MCU, this means I can know which resource I will use in which blades before the meeting? I can check it in application server or somewhere else?
one of my client suffered weard issue that some participant hear choppy voice, should re-joint meeting again, or even sometime, the host should cancle meeting and need to set up again to resolve it
thanks!!!

Tally meeting participants in non-default Calendar

I would like to send a meeting request from a non-default Calendar, but get the message: "This
meeting is not in the Calendar folder for this account. Responses to this meeting will not be tallied."
Numerous threads around this subject revolve around sending the request from the default calendar, but this is not what I wish to do. I have 2 separate calendars which split tasks for 2 different areas of work I do. Obviously one is the default calendar.
I, however, wish to create a meeting in the second calendar and send a meeting request to various people for that meeting. I also wish for the attendees responses to be tallied in this second calendar. Creating and sending the request functions correctly,
and I will even receive a response from the other party but Outlook doesn't capture that response in the calendar, saying that the request came from a calendar that is no longer there (although it is).
Is it at all possible to achieve this in Outlook? If so, could someone advise me how? If not...well, I'll just have to accept this then.

Hi,
This is normal Outlook behavior. This warning occurs when you are using the non-default calendar to send a meeting request. Responses are only automatically processed when the meeting is in the default calendar.
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/calendar/response-meeting-request-tallied/
If you want to change your default calendar to another calendar. We need to change your default Outlook data file with another calendar folder. To achieve it, please follow these steps:
1.Go to File, Account Settings, Data Files.
2.Click Add.
3.Type in a name for the pst file and click OK.
4.Select the new pst and click the Set as default button.
5.Close and re-open Outlook.
6. Click File > Account Settings > E-mail > Change Folder, and select the New pst file.
7. Restart Outlook and all the new created PST file would be the default data file with a default calendar.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Meeting Place 8.5.2 FTP backup option missing

Hi All, I have a customer who has meeting place ver 8.5.2 installed BUT the FTP option for the backup is not avalable. Can anyone confirm if this is a licensing issue or a system setting OR failing that is there a decent SSH/RSYNC client they can use that will do it as that is the only option available?
Many Thanks

I can't believe the CIsco BU or whoever left this out. I feel the need to vent. FTP/sFTP has been an option forever, that every customer could easily support/roll-outon their OS of choice. I am struggling getting Rsync going from two new MeetingPlace servers- there appears to be some TCP port 22 incompatiability issue between MeetingPlace 8.5 and our enterprise UNIX platforms- as silly as this sounds.....I do not get SYN ACKs from MeetingPlace Rsync (seen via PCAP) or from SSH requests from mpx CLI. However, CUMP can connect via SSH to routers/vgw's, and laptops can SSH into our UNIX platforms.
The only thing I see different in the SSH SYN is a TSval field from MeetingPlace, but not from laptop clients. (NTP is configured and time is accurate on MPX).
Does anyone have any ideas for my crazy problem?
Thanks!

Meeting Place 8 Demo License

Hi,
Can any one tell me or point me to a wriiten source that tells what is included with the Meeting Place 8 Demo License. For Example: how many Voice/Video/Web ports are available?
Thanks

You get six of each until you license the MeetingPlace server. I'm not sure if this is documented anywhere, but we ran our MeetingPlace 8 server for a few weeks like that whilst we waited for Cisco to send the licenses out.

Bad Idea: Making default behavior of "built in mouse wheel support" set to on key focus

This is just a little rant....
I love new features in Labview, but setting them to be on automatically when they can generate unexpect behaviour is really a bad idea. We recently moved from 2012 to 2013. Suddenly, I have users saying "values are changing and I don't know why". Turns out they were changing a value in a numeric, then attempting to scroll away. Why on earth would NI make this the default behavior??? Luckly for us the value change wasn't too bad but I could think of a few places that a sudden, unplanned change in a numeric could have ruined an experiment.
Off to do alot of work to undo this....

RTSLVU wrote:
I have noticed this too, but I swear long before 2013.
You should not have to scroll around a user interface to begin with.
If you can not fit a user interface on one screen of the target machine it's time to rethink your interface.
I suggest dividing things up by task and using a tab control.
and this is why I now hate posting in this forum.....
People just love to tell you how you should be doing something, and not focusing on the topic of the thread. If everyone is going to get stuck on the "UI's should not have scroll bars" soap box, see the attached screen shot. This problem arose from a settings pop-up dialog. I could have used tabs, but in this case it makes more sense for the users to move top to bottom in a linear fashion through the process they are setting up.
My point in all this is why would NI make this the default behavior? I like the feature, but it should have been something that a designer has to actively turn on.
Attachments:
settings screen.PNG ‏181 KB

Cisco Meeting place 6.x unable to open admin page

i am having meeting place 6.x .configure IP address to both NICs . Gateway SIM showing me s connected, But Web page of meeting place unable to display

Please have a look at the ssl settings on the ASA: "show run | i ssl".
You may not have strong ciphers enabled and the PC with the newer browser does not accept the default weak ciphers. I make it a habit to setup ASAs with:
ssl encryption 3des-sha1 aes128-sha1 aes256-sha1 rc4-md5
Those are all strong ciphers.

Meeting Place 8- Ports default behavior

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for