Memory setting 1T or 2T. and raid 0 question

i was wondering with my setup should the setting be 1T or 2T, when i checked it was at 2T but im not sure why its not 1T and wanted to make sure i was in the right to move it up to 1T. Also do you have to have the same 2 HDD's if you wanna have a Raid 0 setup?? and would i tell a difference?
MSi k8N NNEo2 platinum
Antec PSU 350w
AMD64 3200+ (Venice) 939
OCZ Enhanced Latency 1GB (2 x 512MB) DDR 400
ATI Radeon 9800 pro
Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 80gig

Quote from: syar2003 on 04-August-05, 12:49:42
Tras is supposed to be CAS+RCD + atleast one/two clock cycles .
Never have it lower than that , it gives corruption for sure .
Take Luke's example
2-3-2 timing : Lowest used Tras=6 (2+3+1)
2-2-2 timing : Lowest used Tras=5 (2+2+1)
2.5-3-3 timing : Lowest used Tras=7&8 . 2.5 is runded to 3 , 3+3+1 tras=7 or 3+3+2cycles tras=8
Some cas 2.5 modules have default spd 2.5-3-3-8 then never have tras lower .
The timing table of my Corsair PC3200C2Pro shows 3,3,3,8.
What values should I set for trwt (row to row delay), trwt (read to write delay), trc (row cycle time), trfc (row refresh cycle time), twr (write recovery time, twtr (write to read delay)?
PS: Syar2003,
Thanks for your clarification on PSU. I got tagan 480 U01 from newegg and there's much less fluctuation now. Last night I set tras to 7, did nothing to FSB and this morning Core Center and cpu-z surprisingly (with delight) show FSB = 230 and 2530mhz instead of 226 and 2486. My search and calculate application shows 2.5% improvements. Is that some sign of unstability?
Thermaltake Soprano case
Tagan U01 480w (+3.3 28A, +5 48A, +12 28A)
3500 Venice @ 2486mhz (FSB=226, 4x, 11x)
MSI neo4 Ultra Platinum
MSI 6600GT
2x512 Corsair 3200C2Pro (manual set 2.5,3,3,7)
WD SATA 80gig
Mitsumi FDD + USB card reader
External iomega cd-RW

Similar Messages

Windows 8 and Raid 5 (English)

Looking for confirmation that Windows 8 does not have the ability to use Raid 5 even if it is presented a single logical drive by a controller.
I have a SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 that makes a drive. All the docs say Raid 0 and Raid 1.
The Windows 8 and Raid 5 question already posted looks to be in Spanish.
With regards,
Quentin L. McCallum, CISSP

Software RAID 5 is not supported on Windows 8. You can use Storage Pool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcz0mDxsucs
Niki Han
TechNet Community Support

Advice on RAID Sets, Volume Sets, and RAID Levels of the Volume Sets using an Areca Controller

I have read through a lot of information on disk usage, storage rules for an editing rig, users inquiries/member responses in this forum and I thank each and every one of you – especially Harm.
In building my new workstation, I purchased five (5) WD 1T, 7k, 64M SATAIII hard drives and an Areca RAID card, ARC-1880ix-16-4G, which I plan to use primarily as my media/data disk array. The workstation will use a 128GB SATAIII SSD as the OS/program drive and I will transfer two (2) WD Raptor/10k SATA 70GB drives from my current system for pagefile/scratch/render use. I tentatively plan on using a mobo SATAIII port for the SSD and mobo SATA ports with a software RAID (level 0) for the 10k Raptors.
In reading the Areca Instruction manual, I am now considering exactly how I should configure the 5 physical 1TB drives in terms of RAID Level(s), Volume Sets, and RAID Sets. I must admit that I like the opportunity of allowing for a Dedicated Hot Spare as I am generally distrustful of the MTBF data that drive vendors tout and have the bad experience in the past of losing data from a mal-configured RAID array and a single drive hardware failure (admittedly, my fault!).
In line with the logic that one doesn’t want to perform disk reading while trying to write at the same time (or vice-versa), I am thinking the approach above should work OK in using the mobo disk interface and both software and external hardware RAID controllers without having to create separate RAID level configurations within a Volume Set or further dividing up the physical drives into separate RAID sets. I know in forum messages that Harm noted that he had 17 drives and I could envision a benefit to having separate RAID sets in that situation, but I am not at that point yet.
To some degree I think it might be best to just create one RAID Level on one Volume Set on one RAID Set, but want to solicit thoughts from veteran controller users on their workflows/thoughts in these regards.
Anyone care to share thoughts/perspectives? Thanks
Bill

Thanks for the speedy feedback Harm - I appreciate it.
I was thinking RAID level 3 as well.
Of course, it's always something! I purchased the Caviar Blacks by mistake - which are non-TLER. I will work with EggHead to return the ones I purchased and replace them with RE4 versions as I'm not thrilled about the possibility of the controller declaring the volume/disks degraded unnecessarily and although I have the DOS utility WDTLER where one is supposed to be able to enable/disable TLER on WD drives - I suspect WD is way beyond that now anyway with current builds.
I agree with you about just testing the performance of the options for the raptors - on the mobo and then on the controller. When I benchmark them I'll post the results in case others are curious.
Thanks again....off to EggHead!

Adding a RAID card to help speed up export (and other drive question) in Premiere Pro CC

First of all, I have read Tweakers Page exporting section because that is where my primary concern is. First my questions, then background and my current and proposed configurations:
Question 1: Will adding a hardware RAID controller, such as an LSI MegaRAID remove enough burden from the CPU managing parity on my software RAID 5 that the CPU will jump for joy and export faster?
Question 2: If true to above, then compare thoughts on adding more smaller SSDs for either a one volume RAID 0 or smaller two volume RAID 0 to complement existing HDD RAID 5. That is, I'm thinking of buying four Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB SSDs to put in a four disk volume to handle everything (media/projects, media cache, previews, exports), or split it up into two volumes of two disks each and split the duties, or keep the four disk volume idea and put the previews & exports on my HDD RAID 5 array.
The 850's are rated at SEQ read/write: 550/470 MB/s thus I could get around 2000/1500 MB/s read write in a four disk RAID 0 or 1/2 that if I split into two volumes to minimize volumes from reading/writing at the same time, if that really matters with these SSDs?
The Tweaker's page made a few comments. One is splitting duties among different disks, rather than a large efficient RAID may actually slow things down. Since the SSDs are much faster than a single HDD, I'm thinking that is no longer accurate, thus I'm leaning toward the Four disk configuration putting OS & Programs on C drive, Media & Projects on D (HDD RAID 5), Pagefile & Media Cache on SSD (2-disk RAID 0) and Previews &Exports on 2nd SSD RAID 0 (or combine the two RAID 0's and their duties).
Just trying to get a perspective here, since I haven't purchased anything yet. Any experience/stories, I would appreciate.
My current drive configuration:
My D drive is software RAID 5 consisting of four 1 TB Western Digital RE4 (RED) 7200 RPM HDDs with a CrystalDiskMark SEQ Read/Write of 339/252 MB/s.
The C drive is SSD 500 GB (Samsung 840 (not Pro) and does 531/330 MB/s. My OS, Program Files and Page File are on C, and data/media files/project, etc all are on the RAID drive.
Problem:
Current setup allows for smooth editing, only the exporting seems slow, often taking between two and two and a half times the video length to export. Thus a 10 minute video takes 20-30 minutes to export. 15 minute video can take 30-40 minutes to export. The first 10% of the two-pass export takes under a minute (seems fast), but it gets slower where the final 10 or 20% can hang for many minutes like my system is running out of steam. So where is the waste?
I have enabled hardware acceleration (did the GPU hack since my GPU isn't listed) and it may spike at 25% usage a few times and eat up 600 MB of VRAM (I have 2 GB of VRAM), otherwise it is idle the whole export. The CPU may spike at 50% but it doesn't seem overly busy either.
Our timeline is simple with two video streams and two audio streams (a little music and mostly voice) with simple transitions (jump cuts or cross dissolves). We sometimes fast color correct, so that might use the GPU? Also, since we film in 1080 60P and export 1080 29.97 frames/sec, I think that is scaling and uses the GPU. I know without the GPU, it does take a lot longer. I have ruled out buying a faster GPU since it doesn't appear to be breaking a sweat. I just need to know if my system is bottlenecked at the hard drive level because I'm using software RAID and my disks are slow and will hardware RAID significantly reduce the CPU load so it can export faster.
Our files are not huge in nature. Most our clips are several MBs each. Total project files are between 5 GBs and 10 GBs for each video with Windows Media File export being 500 MB to 1.2 GB on average. We shoot using Panasonic camcorders so the original files are AVCHD, I believe (.MTS files?).
Considerations:
1. I'm thinking of buying (and future proofing) an LSI Logic MegaRAID 9361-8i that is 12Gb/s SAS and SATA (because some current SSDs can exceed the 6Gb/s standard).
2. I'm not replacing my current RAID 5 HDDs because not in my budget to upgrade to 6 or more large SSDs. These drives are more important to me for temporary storage because I remove the files once backed up. I don't mind a few inexpensive smaller SSDs if they can make a significant difference for editing and exporting.
I can only guess my HDD RAID is slow but the CPU is burdened with parity. I would imagine running RAID 10 would not help much.
My setup:
my setup:
CPU - i7-3930K CPU @4.5 GHz
RAM - G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 2133 @2000
Motherboard - ASUS P9X79 WS LGA 2011
GPU - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 OC 2GB (performed the compatibility list hack to enable hardware acceleration).
C drive - 500 GB Samsung 840 SSD (Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and programs).
D drive - four 1 TB WD RE4 Enterprise HDDs 7200 RPMs in software RAID 5
Case - Cooler Master HAF X
CPU Fan - Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO with 120 mm fan
Power Supply - Corsair Pro Series AX 850 Watt 80 Plus Gold
Optical Drive - Pioneer BDR - 208DBK
thanks in advance,
Eric

........software RAID 5 off the motherboard ??????......NOT a good idea, from what I have read here on this forum from experts like Harm Millard and others. They have mentioned a LARGE overhead on the CPU doing this....causing sub-par performance. RAID 0 off the motherboard will NOT do this, however.....RAID 0 would provide optimum speed, but, with the risk of total data loss if ANY drive fails. You may wish to reconfigure your RAID to be RAID 0...BUT...you would need to DILIGENTLY back up its entire volume onto perhaps a quality 4TB drive very frequently.
A lot depends on the nature of your current and FUTURE codecs you plan to edit. You may not want to sink a lot of money into an older setup that may have trouble with more demanding future codecs. For now, in the 1080p realm, your rig should be OK....the read/write performance on your CURRENT RAID 5 setup is not great, and a definite drag on the performance. The rest of your components appear to be fine.....the Samsung SSD, though not ideal, is OK.....it's write speed is WAY lower than the Pro model,but, the drive is used mainly for reading operations. Since you have Windows 7 Pro, and NOT Windows 8.......you CAN put the entire windows page file onto the RAID 0 you might create.....this will take that frequent read/write load OFF the SSD. Read the "tweakers Page" to see how to best TUNE your machine. To use your current setup most efficiently, without investing much money, you would :a. create the RAID 0 off the motherboard, ( putting all media and project files on it ) b. install a quality 7200rpm 4TB HDD to serve as a BACKUP of the RAID array. Then, install a Crucial M550 256GB or larger SSD, ( close in performance to Samsung 850 Pro...much cheaper), to put all previews, cache , and media cache files on....AND to use as " global performance cache" for After Effects...if you use that program. Exporting can be done to ANOTHER Crucial M550 for best speed...or, just to the either the FIRST Crucial or, the 4TB drive. Your current GPU will accelerate exports on any video containing scaling and any GPU accelerated effects. Your CPU is STILL important in SERVING the data to and from the GPU AND for decoding and encoding non-GPU handled video....your high CPU clock speed helps performance there ! You may want to check out possibly overclocking your video card, using MSI Afterburner.or, similar free program. Increasing the "memory clock speed" can RAISE performance and cut export times on GPU effects loaded timelines,or, scaling operations. On my laptop, I export 25% faster doing this. With my NEW i7 4700 HQ laptop, I export in the range of your CURRENT machine....about 2 to 3 times the length of the original video. PROPERLY SET UP...your desktop machine should BLOW THIS AWAY !!
Visit the PPBM7 website and test your current setup to possibly identify current bottlenecks,or, performance issues. THEN, RE-TEST it again, after making improvements to your machine to see how it does. Be aware that new codecs are coming (H.265 and HEVC,etc.) which may demand more computer horsepower to edit, as they are even MORE compressed and engineered for "streaming" high quality at a lower bandwidth on the internet. The new Haswell E...with its quad-channel memory, 8 core option, large number of PCI gen. 3 lanes, goes farther in being prepared for 4K and more. Testing by Eric Bowen has shown the newer PPro versions provide MUCH better processing of 4K than older versions.

Working photographer needs help with hard drives and raid O decisions

Hi new here and also new to Mac well almost new been 20 years since i had a mac. i have a Mac Pro Book and this led to ordering the MacPro since I am a working photographer i made a complete switch in platforms so i have some questions and such but I did place a order on Friday for a 2.66 4gbs of Ram , 2 500 gb hard drive and a 30 in monitor and of course the ATI 1900 XT card so yes i am waiting like many for that card.
I put initial 4gb of ram since running CS2 will at least take a max of 3gb's in the memory cache . i plan on getting 2gbs more from OWC since that seems to be the only 3rd party ram at the moment that is working correctly from reading some of the threads here. Having 6gbs is a no brainer really given the amount of Raw processing that i do along with PS work plus having e-mail and other apps open at the same time. The ram to me is the easy part although expensive . My biggest issue is what to do with the 2 hard drive slots and Raid O or not but I will start a thread on that. But i will have 6gbs total for now and the bottom line is you can never have enough ram still holds true.
Now on to my diliemma with hard drives. I did have a raid O scsi 10k rapture and and 10 k scratch on my Dell box and I am just not sure what to do here. i ordered the 2 500 gb hard drive and I may just put them on the storage side of things than get 2 WD 150gb 10 k Sata drives. Now i could Raid O them for 300 gb and get a performace boast that way or i could keep them seperate and put everything on 1 150 drive and ue the second for scratch only. What i don't know is what Mac perfers and what works better. Not worried so much about failure of drives, thats just life in the big city stuff and you just have backups. What i more worried about is performance versus a waste . seems to me that Raid O may not even be needed with these new Intel boxes with all the horsepower going on. Now the other think I notice is the WD 150gb 10 k drives are 1.5 and not 3.0 so is it really faster than the 7200 3.0 single hard drives. I read barefeats shoot out and it seems just getting the right drives in 7200 and Raid O them maybe the answer.
Okay i am not the biggest geek on the planet but I do know my stuff but this is a area that i look for more knowledge on this. So if i can get some sound advice in this area. i know there are many photographers out there like me pushing hundreds of images that could use the same advice. Now let's leave the money end out , folks sometimes think more with there wallet than what works best not that I am opposed to saving money but after spending over 7 k already on this system it becomes a moot point. LOL
www.guymancusophoto.com

Ok your question is if you should RAID O the two 150GB Raptors or not.
I think it was wise for you to get a couple of them for a boot drive with "Time Machine" coming in the next version of Mac OS X. The second drive would make a excellent bootable backup and eliminating downtime if a boot drive dies on you one morning.
In fact any boot drive cloning software that is Mac Intel ready now would do you good.
Now Barefeats has run some tests, and I can pretty much back up what they say from my own experience.
Mac OS X and apps can be helped only so much by a faster boot drive, and a single 10,000 RPM Raptor is enough, RAID O a pair is overkill.
If you install everything on the boot Raptor and keep your space hogging files (except iTunes) in new folders on another drive, even a 7,200 RPM 500GB, the two drives combined is faster as there is nearly no wait. Both drives can be accessed at the same time. Keeping the boot drive slim keeps the stylus (arm) moving as little as possible to get all the small reads/writes Mac OS X needs.
I RAID O-ed my boot drives because 74GB was the largest they had at the time, so combining them gave me speed and larger storage. I hardly use the speed, it only comes in handy if by rare chance I duplicate a 20GB folder, then I can do it in half the time of a 7,200 RPM drive.
Some of the drawbacks of a RAID O set, especially as a boot drive is that I have to auto-clone the whole set to a external drive regularly (I actually do a couple). Since the data path is separated with a RAID O, any drive failure results in total data loss.
So if you RAID O those 150GB Raptors, your going to have to clone 300GB to a external drive (or another internal) regularly, like once a week. This will take considerable time and you can't use the machine while the cloning process is going on. Sure auto-cloning software like DeJaVu can be used at night/weekends, but why bother cloning more than you have to for no big speed increase?
However if your messing with huge Photoshop files that spill over your CS2 3GB RAM limit (you need to have a "scratch" thats as fast as RAM), duplicating large files and other heavy duty drive work, then a boot RAID O will come in handy. Just remember your initial performance of 185 MB p/s will drop about 20-25% when those drives are 3/4 filled. Still 140 MB p/s is extremely good and a no worry situation.
What is worrysome is anything below 80MB p/s (I'm talking uncached 4K write speeds under X-Bench) with a new boot drive and then as time elaspes that boot drive gets filled up and loses half or more of it's inital speed. 30 MB p/s is really slow. Beachball H&LL.
http://www.barefeats.com/hard33b.html
Do Erase W/Zero in Disk Utility all new drives before laying data on them. Drives get subjected to shock which causes bad sectors on the drive. Driver software uses your data as a guinea pig to test the sectors (which you might not be able to recover the file). Zeroing does this without your data, rewriting the bad sector map so your writes are much improved, OS is more stable. etc.

How do I give less memory to my boot camp and more to my Mac HD?

I had a friend set up my Bootcamp for me. (He is great with this type of thing and I had no clue.) I used to have a job where I needed to use Windows to run my work program. So he gave a certain amount of my memory to that and left a certain amount for my Mac HD. However, I no longer have that job and I am only using my Bootcamp to run one Windows program. I rarely use it but still need it.
I now want to make it so that I have more memory on my Mac HD and less on the Bootcamp. If anyone can tell me how to do that it would be so greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!
I have a MacBook running Lion 10.7.3. Processor 2 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, Memory 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3. Here is some information from the System information if it is helpful:
Volumes:
disk0s1:
Capacity:    209.7 MB (209,715,200 bytes)
BSD Name:    disk0s1
Content:    EFI
Macintosh HD:
Capacity:    132.5 GB (132,495,007,744 bytes)
Available:    1.62 GB (1,618,046,976 bytes)
Writable:    Yes
File System:    Journaled HFS+
BSD Name:    disk0s2
Mount Point:    /
Content:    Apple_HFS
Recovery HD:
Capacity:    650 MB (650,006,528 bytes)
BSD Name:    disk0s3
Content:    Apple_Boot
BOOTCAMP:
Capacity:    26.69 GB (26,686,259,200 bytes)
Available:    9.36 GB (9,356,976,128 bytes)
Writable:    No
File System:    NTFS
BSD Name:    disk0s4
Mount Point:    /Volumes/BOOTCAMP
Content:    Microsoft Basic Data

The only other way is to erase the Windows partition and start over.
You have about the bare minimum partition size for Windows with 26 gigs now so a few extra taken back wouldn't really help much. You only have 9 gigs free space available so in theory you could only take away 6 gigs or so and still leave enough room for the OS to work.
You need to have an extra 15%~ of extra space (on any OS) for any updates or installers to expand and install the software, they could take up to twice to three times as much room to expand from the original installer file.
If you need more room then you may want to look at maybe a larger main HD, (especially if it's the original drive, gettin old) an external HD or even a USB stick for the extra room you need. A 32 gig USB thumb drive is around $30 now, (on sale) way more capacity then you would get back from the trouble of repartitioning.
My 2 cents worth anyway........

ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist and ORA-01139: RESETLOGS

HI ALL,
After the oracle has installed on a solaries server successfully, i am unable to login into oracle database.
Below are the errors messages :
1) ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
SVR4 Error: 2: No such file or directory
2) Media recovery complete.
alter database open resetlogs
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01139: RESETLOGS option only valid after an incomplete database recovery.
and When i try to login into oracle as root .
this is the error :
sqlplus / as sysdba
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Fri Feb 12 15:52:49 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
ld.so.1: oracle: fatal: libskgxp10.so: open failed: No such file or directory
ERROR:
ORA-12547: TNS:lost contact
my Operating system details :
SunOS Blade3-Chassis2 5.10 Generic_142900-03 sun4v sparc SUNW,Netra-CP3060
Anyone please help me here. waiting for your reply.
Below are the ORACLE_SID Details :
1) echo $ORACLE_SID ----- > ems
2)ps -eaf | grep smon -------> ora_smon_ems
do you need any data?
Edited by: user8959150 on Feb 11, 2010 7:19 PM

Hi
We mostly receive this error message ( ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist and ORA-01139)
When our SGA_MAX_SIZE is greater than 1.7 G.b on
You again configure your sga size
and sga_max_size paramete will not greater than 1.7 G.b
Hope your database will work correctly.
for test purpose you set all your init.ora parameter
db_cache_size=512m
db_keep_cache_size=64m
db_recycle_cache_size=16m
java_pool_size=8m
large_pool_size=16m
shared_pool_size=256m
shared_pool_reserved_size=64m
sga_max_size=1600m
sga_max_size will not be grater than combination of of db_cache_size db_keep_cache_size,db_recycle_cache_sizejava_pool_size+share_pool_size+share_pool_reserved_size
Hope it will work fine.
Regard
Abdul Hameed Malik
[email protected]

Memory setting for weblogic startup file in windows xp

Hi,
I want to change memory setting parameters for weblogic server 8.1 because I am using 128MB memory only.
I found some information edit the startWeblogic.cmd file and change the memory parameters with - x option.
but practically I didn't find the -x option in that file. Please tell me how can I change the memory parameters for weblogic server.
Sorry, I dont know whether it is related to this forum or not.
Regards,
sivaram

How can I change the memory of an instance or an instance in weblogic ?
Please Help
Thank you

SQL Developer 3.0/3.1 64 Bit Memory Setting

Hi,
To avoid hitting memory setting issues with SQL Dev 3.0/3.1 64 bit clients, you can make the following changes:
1) Close SQL Developer
2) Locate the sqldeveloper.conf file
Found in directory:
C:\<SQLDeveloper32\sqldeveloper\sqldeveloper\bin
3) Change the following line
Before:
AddVMOption -XX:MaxPermSize=128M
After:
AddVMOption -XX:MaxPermSize=256M
4) Launch SQL Developer
A memory issue of this sort will generally result in non-responsive UI behavior.
You can verify that you are hitting this issue by launching the console window version of SQL Developer and checking for memory exceptions.
C:\SQLDeveloper30-64RTMPatch1\sqldeveloper\sqldeveloper\bin\sqldeveloper.exe
A bug has been filed change this setting.
Thanks, Mark

SQL Developer itself will work with a 64-bit JDK. It is possible that the data modeler still requires a 32-bit JDK.
You may get better answers in the dedicated Data Modeller forum.

SQL Server Memory Usage Peaks to 95% and its not releasing SQL 2012

We are currently running SQL 2012 64 bit, Lock Pages Enabled, 128 GB. We allocated Max Memory 112000, Min Memory to 0. We have a SQL Maintenace Job which backs up (Full Backup) of our server around 11PM at that time the SQL Server memory peaks to almost
96% even during full business hours we are constantly in the range of 56 to 60% but after 11PM within 10 minutes of the job it peaks to 95 or 96 Percentage and even after the job completes it's not releasing the memory back. I have to manually shut the sql
service and then restart at that time it comes back to normal.
Any suggestions/any help really appreciated.

Here are the details Memory is at 96% I still didn't restart...Please any help appreciated...The memory detals is for 24 hours I restarted the service around 11AM before I posted my previous message..
Memory Used by SqLServer: 119329
Locked Pages Used SQLServer : 105969
Total VAS in MB : 8388607
Process Physical Memory Low : 0
Process Virtual Memory Low : 0
Max Memory set to :112000
Out of 128 Memory Last 24 hours the memory usage in %
Percent Memory Used - Total Memory is 128.0 GB
Last 24 Hours
DATE / TIME
Memory Used
19-Dec-14
11:46 PM
96.24659602
20-Dec-14
12:46 AM
96.24578349
20-Dec-14
1:46 AM
96.25146739
20-Dec-14
2:46 AM
96.24345652
20-Dec-14
3:46 AM
96.27311834
20-Dec-14
4:46 AM
96.28947067
20-Dec-14
5:46 AM
96.18931325
20-Dec-14
6:46 AM
96.09323502
20-Dec-14
7:46 AM
96.07915497
20-Dec-14
8:46 AM
96.07906977
20-Dec-14
9:46 AM
96.0784111
20-Dec-14
10:46 AM
96.07415009
20-Dec-14
11:46 AM
26.03422141
20-Dec-14
12:46 PM
33.57474359
20-Dec-14
1:46 PM
39.466561
20-Dec-14
2:46 PM
41.85940742
20-Dec-14
3:46 PM
43.89071274
20-Dec-14
4:46 PM
45.80877368
20-Dec-14
5:46 PM
46.49493281
20-Dec-14
6:46 PM
46.68486468
20-Dec-14
7:46 PM
46.69701958
20-Dec-14
8:46 PM
46.69994736
20-Dec-14
9:46 PM
57.5012455
20-Dec-14
10:46 PM
96.25695419
I verified its a sqL job and still my memory is 95%
It peaeked at 10:46PM and here are the details of the SQL job which started at 10:30
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:30:04.39
Source: Check Database Integrity Task Executing query "USE [DATASTORE] ".: 50% complete End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:43:06.10
Source: Check Database Integrity Task Executing query "DBCC CHECKDB(N'DATASTORE') WITH NO_INFOMSGS ".: 100% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:43:06.11 Source: Check Database Integrity Task Executing query "USE [ETL_Proc] ".: 50% complete
End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.56 Source: Check Database Integrity Task Executing query "DBCC CHECKDB(N'ETL_Proc')
WITH NO_INFOMSGS ".: 100% complete End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.64 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_create_subdir N'P:\SQL_Backu...".: 20% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.64 Source: Back Up Database Task Executing query "EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_create_subdir N'P:\SQL_Backu...".
: 40% complete End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.64
Source: Back Up Database Task Executing query "EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_create_subdir N'P:\SQL_Backu...".: 60% complete
End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.64 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_create_subdir N'P:\SQL_Backu...".: 80% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:52.64 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_create_subdir N'P:\SQL_Backu...".: 100% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:55.63 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "BACKUP DATABASE [ReportServer] TO DISK = N'P:\SQL...".: 100% complete
End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:56.55 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "BACKUP DATABASE [ReportServerTempDB] TO DISK = N'...".: 100% complete End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:46:57.35
Source: Back Up Database Task Executing query "BACKUP DATABASE [dbamaint] TO DISK = N'P:\SQL_Bac...".: 100% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:51:13.08 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "BACKUP DATABASE [DATASTORE] TO DISK = N'P:\SQL_Ba...".: 100% complete End Progress
Progress: 2014-12-20 22:51:52.72 Source: Back Up Database Task
Executing query "BACKUP DATABASE [ETL_Proc] TO DISK = N'P:\SQL_Bac...".: 100% complete End Progress Progress: 2014-12-20 22:51:54.87
Source: Rebuild Index Task Executing query "USE [ReportServer] ".: 0% complete End Progress Progress:
2014-12-20 22:51:54.88 Source: Rebuild Index Task Executing query "ALT... The package executed successf... The step succeeded.

ST04 Memory Setting

Hi Experts,
We have install SAP on Win 2003 Enterprise Server and SQL Server 2000. In ST04 Transaction Code i am able to see Memory setting is AUTO. This is a central System and such kind of setup the memory setting should be FIXED so that SAP and SQL will not fight for memory and this is also recommended by SAP also. Could you please tell me how to change from AUTO to FIXED.
Thanks & Regards,
Krushna Biswal

Hello,
you can switch to "fixed" if you set the values for
max server memory
min server memory
to the same value. You can do this by either running a script like this
exec sp_configure 'max server memory',<Target Size in MB>
exec sp_configure 'min server memory',<The same value>
or by using the enterprise manager. Right click onto the server and choose
properties. On the memory tab use the option 'Use a fixed memory size (MB)'
and use the slider to define the value.
You do not have to restart the SQL Server for this. He will adjust the values on the fly.
Expect a delay for the refresh in ST04.
Regards
Clas

Newbie FCP HDV monitoring and RAID questions

Hello forum gods.
First off, I must confess - I am a defector seeking assylum in the the Mac camp. I am a born-and-bred Windows person, and a longtime Avid editor who just made the jump and purchased the Mac-Pro with all the bells and whistles, and FCP Studio. I did this to accompany my JVC ProHD cam and deck.
I have no idea what I am going to do with the time I used to spend scanning for viruses and trojans. I am thinking I may write a novel, or build a house by hand - but that is another topic.
Now that the confession is out of the way - we can move on to the actual questions.
<big breath>
Ok - so I have this new fancy shiny computer, deck, camera, and monitors - one of which is the Sony 23" that is comparable to the Apple 23. I do not have a Kona or Blackmagic card because I was told that I did not need one right away - though I do plan on getting one later. For monitoring, I was going to use the firewire in/out of the JVC deck and convert the signal via the component outs to another HD monitor. This would bring the total monitors on the system to 3 - a 19" for the edit screen, the 23" for the video playback in FCP and the braodacast HD for monitoring the final signal.
Is this workable?
Now for the second question - storage and RAID.
Most of my footage will be either SD or HDV. Eventually I'll be going to XDCam, but that's a bit down the road. I have the internal 250 gigger that came in the Mac, and I purchased additional 500gb SATA II drives that I was going to use to set up a RAID. Should I do this internal or external? Will it work? What else do I need? What is the meaning of life?
Thanks for your replies. My credit card is anxiously awaiting your suggestions
G5 Quad Mac OS X (10.4.8)
G5 Quad Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Some question back atcha:
1) When you say you'll be working in SD, what do you
mean? Typically, SD refers to uncompressed 601, 720 X
486. Or are you referring to DV NTSC?
DV NTSC and/or the myriad formats that the JVC100 can do.
2) Your Profile says you have a Quad G5, but your
post says it's a MacPro. Which is it?
Sorry - Consider that my first public gaffe in the new Mac world. I bought the Mac Pro. Time to change my profile. I bought it last week - it isn't even here yet. Supposed to be delivered today...
3) Are you wanting to see your HDV sequence on a
external video monitor while you're editing? If so,
you'll need the Kona card (or the Blackmagic card,
but I don't do BMD, only Aja, so I don't know about
the Blackmagic offerings.)
I've read about the Cinema Preview function and although I know that this isn't the best idea for monitoring, wouldn't it work? On the JVC deck, it has the firewire output/input and component outs (among others) so in E-to-E mode, couldn't the deck act as my converter for monitoring on the broadcast monitor? If not - I have a line on a Kona-2 with the BOB for about $1400. Deal or no deal?
Now as for your RAID question, you can do either
internal or external. Just don't include the drive
that contains your system folder in the RAID.
I was planning on using the 250 for all my system files and the 2-500 giggers as my edit drives. Sound good?
EDIT: As for the meaning of life, go ask your father.
Gaah... He handed me "The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and told me to get to reading....
Thanks for the help. Lord knows I need it.

What is the best heap memory setting for JBoss?

I am running a Windows 2003 server and JBoss is running as service. The current heap configurations is 1024, but I am having some problems with the service failing. What is the optimal heap memory setting? Thank you,

There is no optimal memory setting for LiveCycle.
It depends on the components you have chosen to deploy. If Content Services ES2 is deployed, your heap size settings should be about 2 GB, otherwise 1.0 - 1.7 GB might suffice.
http://blogs.adobe.com/livecycle/2010/01/optimal_livecycle_es2_jboss_ru.html

I just set up my computer and go to boot it and all iget is dark screen..no bios

ive got k8n ne03 mother board
Amd sempron 2800+ socket 654 processor
Ati radeon 9550 agp
512 mb ddr 400/333 memory
12v power supply 350w
....any other info missing let me know
i set it all up and i connected monitor.. i turn on the pc and nothing appears but a black screen...ran out of ideas any suggestions would be helpful

Quote from: Ghostkill on 25-December-06, 04:44:58
dynex dx-ps350w 3.3v/28a 5v/30a 12v/19a
if your VGA is PCI-E what exactly it is? cause you have listed (Ati radeon 9550 agp), and as i know there is no PCI-E 9550.
re-seat CPU, ensure no dust in CPU socket, and apply new thermal paste.
try barabone setup, re-test, if no go take mobo out of case and re-test, if no go try with different and better PSU. if no go test CPU to other machine(with 754mobo) to ensure CPU status is OK. let we know how its going.

Way to set Node's creator and create date explicitly?

Hi,
I'm creating content to Content Repository programmatically using bea.content.NodeOps and it works fine - except the fact that I haven't come up with a way to set e.g. creator and creation date explicitly. Instead, they are populated automatically to current timestamp and '<anonymous>', respectively. That's not what I want.
bea.content.Node class provides a constructor with the parameters mentioned above. However, once I have instantiated Node object using this constructor, there seems to be no way to persist it to the repository (the constructor creates only in-memory object), since none of the overloaded NodeOps.createContentNode() methods takes Node as parameter.
Any ideas?
BR,
Jarkko

These devices are shared, and anyone in the Family could be taking the photos? You can create Albums in the Photo App and at the very least have each person name their Albums with their Name.

Memory setting 1T or 2T. and raid 0 question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for