Message Driven Bean Concurrency

Hi:
I am working with message-driven beans (MDB). My understanding was that
these beans would read and execute concurrently. My tests show they do
not. I have setup a single MDB which contains the following trivial
implementation of onMessage...
public void onMessage(javax.jms.Message message) {
System.err.println("onMessage()");
try{
TextMessage tm = (TextMessage) message;
String text = tm.getText();
System.err.println("Received new message: " + text);
// Simulate non-trivial business process that takes ~10
seconds.
Thread.currentThread().sleep(10000);
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
Now I have a little test application that throws ten messages into the
queue. Each message is consumed from the queue SEQUENTIALLY which is
not my understanding of concurrent processing. So in all sending ten
messages to the queue each message is processed in turn taking 100 seconds
for the whole thing to complete instead of 10 MDB instances all chewing on
a different message and the whole thing would complete in roughly 10
seconds.
Is there a setup step that I have missed? I have bumped the
default.properties file messagebean.pool.size=30 from its default of 3.
It does create 10 bean instances, what for I don't know...
Thanks
Steve

Message beans are used for asynchronous calls, meaning that the container decides in what order to execute them. If you want to achieve concurrent calls consider using Session Beans.
Regards,
Dimitar

Similar Messages

  • Can you set isolation levels of message-driven bean transactions?

    The problem: I have 3 different message-driven beans which each get a different type of message, except for a field that is common to all. That field is used as the primary key of an entity object. The message-driven beans configured to use a container managed transaction. Each message-driven bean, in processing the message, first does a lookup by primary key to see if the object associated with the key exists, and if it does not, it requests the entity's home object to create it. After that, they do further processing. The problem is that sometimes all the beans simultaneously get a message, resulting in each bean checking for the entity object at about the same time, and if they fail to find it (because none of them has created it yet), each creates an object, all with the same primary key. This is not caught until the beans start to complete their onMessage method, which I believe results in the container committing the transaction. One of the transactions will be committed successfully, while the other two will fail, get rolled back, and then be retried with the same message. The second time through, the other beans will find the entity object (since it has been created and committed) and they will complete correctly. In the end, they right thing occurs, except that there is a troubling exception or 2 in the log telling about the constraint violation (with the primary key) and the rollback. If it was just me, that would be fine, but our customer does not like to see exceptions in the log; that indicates to him that something is wrong.
    So, I am looking for someway to make sure that the actions of the message-driven beans are serialized. One suggestion from a colleague was to set the isolation level of the transactions being used by the container in processing the message-driven beans' onMessage method. However, the documentation does not mention any way to do this for a message-driven bean. Suggestions?
    Is the use of a UserTransaction a better way to do this? If I acquire a UserTransaction within the onMessage method of a message-driven bean, can I set its isolation level? How would this work? When I get a UserTransaction, does each client get a different transaction, or do they all get the same one?

    (1) The WebLogic JMS "unit-of-order" feature is a heavily adopted feature that was specifically designed to handle similar use cases - see the JMS developer guide for extensive documentation. In your use case, if "key" is used to define UOO, then there's no limit on the number of keys that can be processed concurrently, but messages for any particular key will be processed single-threaded in the order in which they were first submitted.
    Note that if you're using distributed destinations, the UOO feature is still fully supported - but the developer and/or administrator needs to decide whether to configure the destination to use "hash" or "path service" based routing (the JMS UOO edoc outlines the trade-offs).
    (2) Another alternative is to use a single MDB with max-beans-free-pool that processes all three types (as the other poster suggested). I think this assumes all MDBs run on the same JVM.
    (3) Another alternative is to use multiple queues, with a single MDB on each Q. Where some sort of hash algorithm is used to determine which Q is for the key. This approach is a "hand-coded" variant of the approach in (1) with "hash" based routing enabled...
    (4) If all MDBs actually do run in the same JVM, a third alternative is to use code the application to use a common lock to protect each key, eg, something like:
    // assume MyLock is simply a class with a "reference counter"
    // assume some global "staticHM" hash map that is all MDBs can access
    onMessage() {
    MyLock lock = null;
    key= msg.getKey();
    synchronized(staticHM) {
    lock = staticHM.get();
    if (lock = null) {
    lock = new lock();
    staticHM.put(key, new lock());
    lock.incRefCount();
    try {
    synchronized(lock) {
    // only one onMessage will be able to lock a particular key at a time
    do your work;
    } finally {
    synchronized(staticHT) {
    if (lock.defRefCount() == 0) staticHM.remove(lock);
    if (lock = null) staticHM.put(key);
    If multiple threads get a message with the same key, then only one thread at a time will work on the key.
    Hope this helps,
    Tom

  • Message Driven Bean -- Instance Creation..

    As we know MDB (inJMS) acts as a listener to a message coming from either a topic/queue. The instance of MDB is created by the EJB Container and the no. of instances created depend upon the corresponding values specified in the Deployment-Descriptor. So we never have to create instance of MDB bcoz container takes care of itself. MDB is eventDriven and the method onMessage is fired when topic/queue receives a message.
    Now, can I have a scenario where my client creates an instance of MDB explicitly. Say I have an MDB by name TestMDB, I create an instance of MDB using new keyword something like the below code:
    TestMDB testMDB = new TestMDB();
    The client grabs messages which are recd. using onMessage of TestMDB. I put the msgs recd. in onMessage method into some kind of HashMap and return it to the client. This for sure satisfies my requirement, but EJB specification says MDB instances are created by the EJB Container itslef and that does not give me an easy feeling.
    Are there any caveats of creating instances of Message Driven Bean ??

    Hi,
    Why would you like to create your own MDB instance?
    Is it because you don�t want to use an EJB container?
    Otherwise, you should know that the container is doing a lot of work under the cover. It is not that simple to achieved concurrent message processing.
    I would really recommend you to either use an EJB container or to redesign your application. If you really don�t want to use a heavy weight EJB container you can have a look at Arjuna�MDS that provides you with a light weight container allowing to deploy MDBs like applications.
    Hope this helps,
    Arnaud
    www.arjuna.com

  • Question about message driven bean

    hello
    i can find tons of tutoriala about developing session bean and entity bean by using jdeveloper,but can't find even one article that tell me how to develop message driven bean and jms by using jdeveloper,who can help me,where can i find such tutorial?
    thank you!

    I setup breakpoints setting thru the MDB examples in j2eesdk 1.4.
    I realize that the message to the being are being process sequentially.
    Is there a way to process message in MDB concurrently?
    Thank you.

  • Message Driven Beans

    Hi,
    I am building a simple dispatcher around Message Driven Beans. I have a simple
    test program -
    MDB : onMessage sleeps for 10 seconds.
    Client: sends 100 messages
    I notected the following:
    1. Only 13 messages are processed concurrently
    2. Client is blocking for all messages to complete processing.
    I have set the queue length to unlimited, have a file store, and have set the
    thread cound up to 100. I am not sure what I am missing.
    Thanks.
    - viraf

    Did you verify that you increased execute therad count? If client blocks,
    then most likely all server execute threads are busy (sleeping for 10 seconds).
    You can easily check this my making a therad dump.
    no spam <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi,
    I am building a simple dispatcher around Message Driven Beans. I have a simple
    test program -
    MDB : onMessage sleeps for 10 seconds.
    Client: sends 100 messages
    I notected the following:
    1. Only 13 messages are processed concurrently
    2. Client is blocking for all messages to complete processing.
    I have set the queue length to unlimited, have a file store, and have set the
    thread cound up to 100. I am not sure what I am missing.
    Thanks.
    - viraf--
    Dimitri

  • Message-driven beans Vs JMS

    Hi,
    what does the bean technology add to the JSM by using the message driven beans instead of just using the regular asynchronus JMS?

    that's my question when and why should we chose:
    1. simple asynchronous JMS
    2. message-driven beansYou presumably mean:
    1. "simple" JMS client
    2. MDB JMS client
    That'll depend first on your existing architecture.You'll go for the second option if you're already using EJB , as to leverage your existing IT investment.
    Second, the EJB container gives you a number of services, so you don't have to worry about those yourself: life cycle management, scalability, transaction support, concurrency etc..
    With a plain JMS client, you'll have to handle concurrency yourself, for example, by spawning different JMS instances.
    If you're using an EJB container, that container will instantiate multiple MDB instances to handle multiple messages simultaneously.
    OTOH, The EJB contract implies some limitations of use. For example, an MDB can be associated with only one queue or topic. So if you need a JMS client to be able to handle multiple queues ot topics, you'll need to create multiple MDB clients, or go for a simple non-MDB JMS consumer.

  • How to transaction in the message driven bean?

              hello
              i write a message driven bean,that monitor the weblogic message queue,when a "Order"
              object is witten to the queue,the mdb get it and write it to a entity bean "Orderinfo".all
              of above logic is within the "onMessage" method of the mdb.
              i want to encapsulate the flow in a transaction,see my code snippet of the onMessage
              method:
              ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage) msg;
              OrderVO orderVO = (OrderVO) objMsg.getObject();
              System.out.println(orderVO.booklist);
              OrderinfoHome orderinfoHome = (OrderinfoHome) ctx.lookup(
              "java:/comp/env/orderinfo");
              Orderinfo orderinfo = orderinfoHome.create(orderVO.orderID);
              orderinfo.setAddress(orderVO.address);
              orderinfo.setCustname(orderVO.custName);
              orderinfo.setEmail(orderVO.email);
              orderinfo.setBooklist(orderVO.booklist);
              orderinfo.setPrice(new BigDecimal(orderVO.price));
              and deploy descriptor snippet(ejb-jar.xml):
              <assembly-descriptor>
              <container-transaction>
              <method>
              <ejb-name>orderMDB</ejb-name>
              <method-name>*</method-name>
              </method>
              <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
              </container-transaction>
              </assembly-descriptor>
              i think during this transaction,there are two action:geting the object from the
              queue and saving it to entity bean.in order to test the transaction,i modify the
              jndi name of entity bean in the code to a WRONG one.redeploy my program,and send
              a message to the queue,the mdb is activated,then the exception is thrown because
              of the wrong jndi name.after that,i check the message queue,find that it is empty.why?i
              think if the second action of the transaction is fail,the transaction should roll
              back,the message should be send BACK to the queue.
              i also ty to use the "javax.transaction.UserTransaction" in the onMessage method,but
              the follwing exception is thrown:
              javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Another transaction is associated with
              this thread.................................
              who can help me,if any wrong with me,and how to use the transaction with the message
              driven bean?
              thank you.
              

    The transaction should rollback if the MDB throws an
              exception. Try changing your MDB code to
              call "setRollbackOnly()" on the EJB
              context (instead of throwing an exception) to see
              if that works. If calling "setRollbackOnly()" fixes
              the problem - then please contact customer support
              and report a bug.
              zbcong wrote:
              > hello
              >
              > i write a message driven bean,that monitor the weblogic message queue,when a "Order"
              > object is witten to the queue,the mdb get it and write it to a entity bean "Orderinfo".all
              > of above logic is within the "onMessage" method of the mdb.
              > i want to encapsulate the flow in a transaction,see my code snippet of the onMessage
              > method:
              >
              >
              > ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage) msg;
              > OrderVO orderVO = (OrderVO) objMsg.getObject();
              > System.out.println(orderVO.booklist);
              > OrderinfoHome orderinfoHome = (OrderinfoHome) ctx.lookup(
              > "java:/comp/env/orderinfo");
              > Orderinfo orderinfo = orderinfoHome.create(orderVO.orderID);
              > orderinfo.setAddress(orderVO.address);
              > orderinfo.setCustname(orderVO.custName);
              > orderinfo.setEmail(orderVO.email);
              > orderinfo.setBooklist(orderVO.booklist);
              > orderinfo.setPrice(new BigDecimal(orderVO.price));
              >
              >
              > and deploy descriptor snippet(ejb-jar.xml):
              >
              >
              > <assembly-descriptor>
              > ............
              > ...........
              >
              > <container-transaction>
              > <method>
              > <ejb-name>orderMDB</ejb-name>
              > <method-name>*</method-name>
              > </method>
              > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
              > </container-transaction>
              > </assembly-descriptor>
              >
              >
              > i think during this transaction,there are two action:geting the object from the
              > queue and saving it to entity bean.in order to test the transaction,i modify the
              > jndi name of entity bean in the code to a WRONG one.redeploy my program,and send
              > a message to the queue,the mdb is activated,then the exception is thrown because
              > of the wrong jndi name.after that,i check the message queue,find that it is empty.why?i
              > think if the second action of the transaction is fail,the transaction should roll
              > back,the message should be send BACK to the queue.
              >
              > i also ty to use the "javax.transaction.UserTransaction" in the onMessage method,but
              > the follwing exception is thrown:
              >
              > javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Another transaction is associated with
              > this thread.................................
              >
              > who can help me,if any wrong with me,and how to use the transaction with the message
              > driven bean?
              >
              > thank you.
              >
              >
              

  • Message Driven Bean and transaction handling

    We are using container managed transactions with MDB's running on OC4J version 10.1.2. We have two database serveres, both running Oracle 10g.
    The MDB consume messages from the AQ-database through JMS (connected to a JDBC datasource registered as "jdbc/OracleAQDS").
    The MDB onMessage() code update the second database, using a JDBC datasource registered as "jdbc/OracleDBDS".
    We need atomic behaviour - if the MDB enforce a roll-back we want the updates aginst the second database to be rolled-back as well.
    (1) Should we use XA-datasources since AQ and DB runs on two different servers or do the OC4J container "magically" provide two-phase-commit for us?
    (2) If the MDB does a roll-back we would like to add an error record to a database table. Can we configure a third datasource and prevent if from beeing part of the container managed MDB roll-back?
    (3) When the MDB force a roll-back, is there some way for us to override the retry-delay in our Java code? If we catch certain errors during processing in onMessage we know that it is not necessary to retry for at least one hour (while less severe errors should be retried in just seconds).

    {color:#008000}Hi Friends,
    Thought of updating the answers for my questions in case somebody else would find it helpful.
    {color}
    {color:#999999}{color:#00ccff}I'm trying to make message driven bean and use the OnListener method.
    But since I'm doing this for the first time I have very limited knowledge.
    The following are my doubts :
    1. Should I have a main function while using the MDB?{color}
    {color:#008000} There is no need for any main function.{color}
    {color:#00ccff}2. Is it mandatory to have JNDI setup done?
    {color} {color}{color:#008000} There is no need for any JNDI setup done. But you need to configure the details on the
    Websphere by creating valid entries inside Resources namely -
    Queue Connection Factory, Queues and Listener Ports under the server.
    Thanks,
    Arun Prithviraj{color}

  • WebLogic 10 and EJB 3.0 for Message Driven Bean

    Hi,
    I am trying to deploy Message Driven Bean using EJB3.0 on weblogic 10. I am using annotations and don't want to use deployment descriptors.
    The Bean class:
    CalculatorBean.java
    import javax.ejb.*;
    import javax.jms.*;
    import java.sql.Timestamp;
    import java.util.StringTokenizer;
    @MessageDriven(activationConfig =
    @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName="destinationType",
    propertyValue="javax.jms.Queue"),
    @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName="destination",
    propertyValue="queue/mdb")
    public class CalculatorBean implements MessageListener {
    public void onMessage (Message msg) {
    TextMessage tmsg=null;
    try {
    if (msg instanceof TextMessage) {
    tmsg = (TextMessage) msg;
    System.out.println
    ("MESSAGE BEAN1: Message received: "
    + tmsg.getText());
    } else {
    System.out.println
    ("Message of wrong type1: "
    + msg.getClass().getName());
    catch (JMSException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
    catch (Throwable te) {
    te.printStackTrace();
    My client:
    import javax.naming.*;
    import javax.naming.InitialContext;
    import java.text.*;
    import javax.jms.*;
    public class MsgClient {
    public static void main(String args[])
    QueueConnection cnn=null;
    QueueSender sender=null;
    QueueSession sess=null;
    Queue queue=null;
    try {
    java.util.Properties p = new java.util.Properties();
    p.put("java.naming.factory.initial","weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
    p.put("java.naming.provider.url","t3://10.6.74.79:7001");
    Context ctx=new InitialContext(p);
    //InitialContext ctx=new InitialContext(p);
    queue = (Queue)ctx.lookup("queue/mdb");
    QueueConnectionFactory factory = (QueueConnectionFactory)ctx.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
    cnn = factory.createQueueConnection();
    sess= cnn.createQueueSession(false, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
    sender = sess.createSender(queue);
    TextMessage message = sess.createTextMessage();
    message.setText("This is message by Gurumurthy" );
    System.out.println("Sending message: " +message.getText());
    sender.send(message);
    sess.close();
    catch (Exception e)
    e.printStackTrace();
    I am compiling and creating jar file for this class. Then I am creating a .ear file for this.
    The meta-inf/application.xml contains the following:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <application xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee" version="1.4"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com /xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/application_1_4.xsd">
    <display-name>MDBWorking1</display-name>
    <description>Application description</description>
    <module>
    <ejb>MDBWorking1.jar</ejb>
    </module>
    </application>
    I don't want to use deployment descriptor (ejb-jar.xml or weblogic-ejb-jar-xml), because I want to utilize the annotation feature of EJB3.0
    So, after creating the .ear file for this, and try to deploy on weblogic 10, I get the following error:
    An error occurred during activation of changes, please see the log for details.
    Exception preparing module: EJBModule(MDBWorking1.jar) Unable to deploy EJB: CalculatorBean from MDBWorking1.jar: [EJB:011113]Error: The Message Driven Bean 'CalculatorBean(Application: MDBWorking1, EJBComponent: MDBWorking1.jar)', does not have a message destination configured. The message destination must be set using a message-destination-link, destination-resource-link, destination-jndi-name or a resource-adapter-jndi-name.
    Substituted for missing class [EJB - 11113]Error: The Message Driven Bean 'CalculatorBean(Application: MDBWorking1, EJBComponent: MDBWorking1.jar)', does not have a message destination configured. The message destination must be set using a message-destination-link, destination-resource-link, destination-jndi-name or a resource-adapter-jndi-name.
    How to solve this?
    Note:
    I don't want to use Deployment Descriptor and all I want to use is EJB3.0's annotation feature.
    Thanks,
    Guru

    Dear gurubbc,
    I don't know if it still matters to you but you can use the javax.ejb.MessageDriven annotation to point your bean on your queue. I had the same issue like you but i could not solve it properly by switchihg to weblogic.ejb.MessageDriven.
    Use the following annotation and it should work out:
    @MessageDriven
    (mappedName = "queue/mdb",
    name = "CalculatorBean",
    activationConfig = {
    @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue")
    Here you can see that the mappedName is the JNDI name of the queue you are trying to connect to. The name is the name for your Bean, and the only property passed is the destination type.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Istvan

  • JBoss message driven bean calling a session bean

    Hi guys, can you please help me? I want my mdb to call my session bean....can you provide me some examples of ejb-jar.xml and jboss.xml with regards to this configuration....thanks...im creating my deployment descriptors manually

    Here is a little example, I hope it will help you.
    ejb-jar.xml
    =============================================
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd">
    <ejb-jar >
    <enterprise-beans>
    <!-- Session Beans -->
    <session >
    <display-name>TestSessionEJB</display-name>
    <ejb-name>TestSession</ejb-name>
    <home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionHome</home>
    <remote>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSession</remote>
    <local-home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocalHome</local-home>
    <local>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocal</local>
    <ejb-class>mdbtest.session.TestSessionEJB</ejb-class>
    <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
    <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
    ... </session>
    <!-- Message Driven Beans -->
    <message-driven >
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <display-name>TestMessageEJB</display-name>
    <ejb-name>TestMessage</ejb-name>
    <ejb-class>mdbtest.message.TestMessageEJB</ejb-class>
    <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
    <message-selector></message-selector>
    <acknowledge-mode>Auto-acknowledge</acknowledge-mode>
    <message-driven-destination>
    <destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
    <subscription-durability>NonDurable</subscription-durability>
    </message-driven-destination>
    <ejb-local-ref >
    <ejb-ref-name>ejb/TestEjb</ejb-ref-name>
    <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
    <local-home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocalHome</local-home>
    <local>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocal</local>
    <ejb-link>TestSession</ejb-link>
    </ejb-local-ref>
    </message-driven>
    </enterprise-beans>
    </ejb-jar>
    jboss.xml:
    =============================================
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE jboss PUBLIC "-//JBoss//DTD JBOSS 3.0//EN" "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_3_0.dtd">
    <jboss>
    <enterprise-beans>
    <session>
    <ejb-name>TestSession</ejb-name>
    <jndi-name>ejb/MdbTest/TestSession</jndi-name>
    <local-jndi-name>TestSessionLocal</local-jndi-name>
    <configuration-name>Standard Stateless SessionBean</configuration-name>
    </session>
    <message-driven>
    <ejb-name>TestMessage</ejb-name>
    <destination-jndi-name>queue/MyTestQueue</destination-jndi-name>
    <configuration-name>Standard Message Driven Bean</configuration-name>
    </message-driven>
    </enterprise-beans>
    <resource-managers>
    </resource-managers>
    </jboss>

  • Message Driven Bean: problem with @RunAs annotation

    I am having a problem using the @RunAs annotation in a message driven bean.
    I would like the code in my onMessage() method to be executed with a specific role/user, so I want to use the @RunAs annotation to achieve this.
    I am running weblogic 10.0.
    I have created the following in weblogic console:
    - Group "TestGroup"
    - User "TestUser", member of "TestGroup"
    - Global Role "TestRole", role condition: "Group : TestGroup"
    The MDB:
    package be.cegeka.test.mdb;
    import javax.annotation.Resource;
    import javax.annotation.security.RunAs;
    import javax.ejb.ActivationConfigProperty;
    import javax.ejb.MessageDriven;
    import javax.ejb.MessageDrivenContext;
    import javax.jms.Message;
    import javax.jms.MessageListener;
    @MessageDriven(
              mappedName = "testQueue",
              name = "TestMDB",
              activationConfig = {
                        @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue")
    @RunAs("TestRole")
    public class TestMDB implements MessageListener {
         @Resource
         private MessageDrivenContext mdContext;
          * {@inheritDoc}}
         public void onMessage(Message msg) {
              System.out.println("Handling message for user "
                        + mdContext.getCallerPrincipal().getName());
    }[u]The ejb-jar.xml file:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ejb-jar xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ejb-jar_3_0.xsd"
    version="3.0">
         <assembly-descriptor>
              <security-role>
                   <description>
                        Test Role.
                   </description>
                   <role-name>TestRole</role-name>
              </security-role>
         </assembly-descriptor>
    </ejb-jar>
    The weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file:
    <weblogic-ejb-jar xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0 http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0/weblogic-ejb-jar.xsd">
         <security-role-assignment>
              <role-name>TestRole</role-name>
              <principal-name>TestUser</principal-name>
         </security-role-assignment>
    </weblogic-ejb-jar>I would have thought that the onMessage of the MDB would print "Handling message for user TestUser", but instead it prints "Handling message for user <anonymous>".
    It seems as though the @RunAs annotation has no effect. Although I specified the role TestRole (mapped to the user TestUser), the code still seems to be executed by user anonymous.
    Am I missing something?
    Any help would be much appreciated! I've been looking at this poblem for quite a while now.

    Both beans (the MDB on WLS 10 and the session bean on WLS 8.1) use container managed transactions.
    For the MDB I do not explicitly set the transaction attributes, so it should default to container managed transactions.
    For the stateless session bean I have specified the following in the ejb-jar.xml file:
    <ejb-jar>
      <display-name>Weblogic8Service</display-name>
      <enterprise-beans>
        <session>
          <ejb-name>Weblogic8Service</ejb-name>
          <home>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceRemoteHome</home>
          <remote>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceRemote</remote>
          <ejb-class>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceBean</ejb-class>
          <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
          <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
        </session>
      </enterprise-beans>
      <assembly-descriptor>
        <container-transaction>
          <method>
            <ejb-name>Weblogic8Service</ejb-name>
            <method-name>*</method-name>
          </method>
          <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
        </container-transaction>
      </assembly-descriptor>
    </ejb-jar>So as far as I understand it the transaction starts at the MDB (upon receival of a message). The transaction for the remote call to the stateless session bean (in the onMessage() of the MDB) is included in the transaction of the MDB and gets committed when the onMessage() method finishes and the transaction of the MDB itself gets committed.
    Correct me if I'm wrong here.

  • Error during deployment of Message Driven Bean

    Environment: WLS 6.1SP3 on Win2K SP2, non-clustered.
              I am getting some error (or perhaps warning) during deployment of Message
              Driven Bean. Any one seen this before?
              This error only comes on a machine with Dual Network card.
              Thanks.
              ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:04 AM GMT> <Info> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              <system> <> <010008> <EJB Deploying file: AppRuntime.jar>
              ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:04 AM GMT> <Warning> <J2EE> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              <system> <> <160007> <You are running WebLogic Server with J2EE 1.3 features
              enabled. The implementation of specific J2EE 1.3 features (EJB 2.0, JSP 1.2,
              Servlet 2.3, and J2EE Connector Architecture 1.0) in BEA WebLogic Server 6.1
              is of a non-final version of the appropriate specification. It is subject to
              change in future releases once the specification becomes finalized. This may
              cause application code developed for BEA WebLogic Server 6.1 that uses the
              new features of J2EE 1.3 to be incompatible with the J2EE 1.3 platform
              supported in future releases of BEA WebLogic Server.>
              ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:07 AM GMT> <Warning> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              <system> <> <010061> <The Message-Driven EJB: ASYNCMessageDrivenBean is
              unable to connect to the JMS destination: CQM_MessageQueue. The EJB
              container will automatically attempt to re-establish the connection with the
              JMS server. This warning may occur during WebLogic Cluster start-up if the
              JMS destination is located on another server. When the JMS server connection
              is re-established, the Message-Driven EJB will again receive JMS messages.
              The Error was:
              Unable to create a JNDI InitialContext to lookup the JMS destination. The
              error was:
              javax.naming.CommunicationException. Root exception is
              java.net.ConnectException: t3://127.0.0.1:7001: Destination unreachable;
              nested exception is:
              java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect; No available router
              to destination
              at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMFinder.findOrCreate(RJVMFinder.java:155)
              at weblogic.rjvm.ServerURL.findOrCreateRJVM(ServerURL.java:207)
              at
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialCon
              textFactoryDelegate.java:307)
              at
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialCon
              textFactoryDelegate.java:211)
              at
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFact
              ory.java:149)
              at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
              at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
              at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
              at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:193)
              at
              weblogic.ejb20.deployer.MessageDrivenBeanInfoImpl.getInitialContext(MessageD
              rivenBeanInfoImpl.java:641)
              at
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.createJMSConnection(JMSConnectio
              nPoller.java:474)
              at
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.connectToJMS(JMSConnectionPoller
              .java:418)
              at
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.startJMSConnectionPolling(JMSCon
              nectionPoller.java:286)
              at
              weblogic.ejb20.deployer.MessageDrivenBeanInfoImpl.deploy(MessageDrivenBeanIn
              foImpl.java:511)
              at weblogic.ejb20.deployer.Deployer.deployDescriptor(Deployer.java:1294)
              at weblogic.ejb20.deployer.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:996)
              at weblogic.j2ee.EJBComponent.deploy(EJBComponent.java:31)
              at weblogic.j2ee.Application.addComponent(Application.java:170)
              at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEService.addDeployment(J2EEService.java:117)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.addDeployment(DeploymentT
              arget.java:360)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.addDeployments(Deployment
              Target.java:285)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.updateServerDeployments(D
              eploymentTarget.java:239)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.updateDeployments(Deploym
              entTarget.java:199)
              at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl
              .java:636)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:6
              21)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBea
              nImpl.java:360)
              at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1557)
              at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1525)
              at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:468)
              at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:209)
              at $Proxy34.updateDeployments(Unknown Source)
              at
              weblogic.management.configuration.ServerMBean_CachingStub.updateDeployments(
              ServerMBean_CachingStub.java:2977)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.startConfigManager(Appl
              icationManager.java:372)
              at
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.start(ApplicationManage
              r.java:160)
              at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl
              .java:636)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:6
              21)
              at
              weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBea
              nImpl.java:360)
              at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1557)
              at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1525)
              at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:468)
              at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:209)
              at $Proxy49.start(Unknown Source)
              at
              weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationManagerMBean_CachingStub.start(
              ApplicationManagerMBean_CachingStub.java:480)
              at weblogic.management.Admin.startApplicationManager(Admin.java:1234)
              at weblogic.management.Admin.finish(Admin.java:644)
              at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.start(T3Srvr.java:524)
              at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:207)
              at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:35)
              >
              ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:07 AM GMT> <Info> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name
              ASYNCMessageDrivenBean.>
              

    Hi Tom
              Yes we do have an URL provided in the descriptor. It's
              t3://jms.server.net:7001.
              and the jms.server.net is resolved via a hosts file in Win2K
              eg,
              192.168.100.200 jms.server.net
              You are right in saying that the loopback in a dual-net card is a problem.
              But our solution
              above solves the issue as long as your host file does not use 127.0.0.1 as
              the IP.
              We need the URL b/c depending on our client's deployment , the JMS Server
              may be remote or may be local.
              "Tom Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              > Hi x,
              >
              > Something to do with the loopback and dual-network cards is
              > messin' with WLS' mind. I do not know what the problem is,
              > but I can guess:
              >
              > You have specified an URL in the MDB descriptor when there
              > is no need for one. If t3://127.0.0.1:7001 is in the same
              > cluster the MDB is running in (I suspect this URL is
              > actually the same WL server), then don't specify the URL.
              > This URL is only useful for connecting an MDB to a JMS
              > server that is outside local server and outside the cluster.
              > The URL may be working on single-network card systems
              > as perhaps then WL has enough info to guess that you
              > actually mean the local WL server, and simply converts
              > the context to a local context.
              >
              > Note that the URL option in the MDB descriptor is actually
              > a WebLogic extension of J2EE.
              >
              > Tom
              >
              >
              >
              > x wrote:
              > > Environment: WLS 6.1SP3 on Win2K SP2, non-clustered.
              > >
              > > I am getting some error (or perhaps warning) during deployment of
              Message
              > > Driven Bean. Any one seen this before?
              > > This error only comes on a machine with Dual Network card.
              > >
              > > Thanks.
              > >
              > >
              > >
              > > ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:04 AM GMT> <Info> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              > > <system> <> <010008> <EJB Deploying file: AppRuntime.jar>
              > > ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:04 AM GMT> <Warning> <J2EE> <QAAPP01> <Makalu>
              <main>
              > > <system> <> <160007> <You are running WebLogic Server with J2EE 1.3
              features
              > > enabled. The implementation of specific J2EE 1.3 features (EJB 2.0, JSP
              1.2,
              > > Servlet 2.3, and J2EE Connector Architecture 1.0) in BEA WebLogic Server
              6.1
              > > is of a non-final version of the appropriate specification. It is
              subject to
              > > change in future releases once the specification becomes finalized. This
              may
              > > cause application code developed for BEA WebLogic Server 6.1 that uses
              the
              > > new features of J2EE 1.3 to be incompatible with the J2EE 1.3 platform
              > > supported in future releases of BEA WebLogic Server.>
              > > ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:07 AM GMT> <Warning> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu>
              <main>
              > > <system> <> <010061> <The Message-Driven EJB: ASYNCMessageDrivenBean is
              > > unable to connect to the JMS destination: CQM_MessageQueue. The EJB
              > > container will automatically attempt to re-establish the connection with
              the
              > > JMS server. This warning may occur during WebLogic Cluster start-up if
              the
              > > JMS destination is located on another server. When the JMS server
              connection
              > > is re-established, the Message-Driven EJB will again receive JMS
              messages.
              > > The Error was:
              > > Unable to create a JNDI InitialContext to lookup the JMS destination.
              The
              > > error was:
              > > javax.naming.CommunicationException. Root exception is
              > > java.net.ConnectException: t3://127.0.0.1:7001: Destination unreachable;
              > > nested exception is:
              > > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect; No available
              router
              > > to destination
              > > at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMFinder.findOrCreate(RJVMFinder.java:155)
              > > at weblogic.rjvm.ServerURL.findOrCreateRJVM(ServerURL.java:207)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialCon
              > > textFactoryDelegate.java:307)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialCon
              > > textFactoryDelegate.java:211)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFact
              > > ory.java:149)
              > > at
              javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
              > > at
              javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
              > > at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
              > > at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:193)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.ejb20.deployer.MessageDrivenBeanInfoImpl.getInitialContext(MessageD
              > > rivenBeanInfoImpl.java:641)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.createJMSConnection(JMSConnectio
              > > nPoller.java:474)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.connectToJMS(JMSConnectionPoller
              > > .java:418)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.ejb20.internal.JMSConnectionPoller.startJMSConnectionPolling(JMSCon
              > > nectionPoller.java:286)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.ejb20.deployer.MessageDrivenBeanInfoImpl.deploy(MessageDrivenBeanIn
              > > foImpl.java:511)
              > > at
              weblogic.ejb20.deployer.Deployer.deployDescriptor(Deployer.java:1294)
              > > at weblogic.ejb20.deployer.Deployer.deploy(Deployer.java:996)
              > > at weblogic.j2ee.EJBComponent.deploy(EJBComponent.java:31)
              > > at weblogic.j2ee.Application.addComponent(Application.java:170)
              > > at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEService.addDeployment(J2EEService.java:117)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.addDeployment(DeploymentT
              > > arget.java:360)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.addDeployments(Deployment
              > > Target.java:285)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.updateServerDeployments(D
              > > eploymentTarget.java:239)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.DeploymentTarget.updateDeployments(Deploym
              > > entTarget.java:199)
              > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl
              > > .java:636)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:6
              > > 21)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBea
              > > nImpl.java:360)
              > > at
              com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1557)
              > > at
              com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1525)
              > > at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:468)
              > > at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:209)
              > > at $Proxy34.updateDeployments(Unknown Source)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.configuration.ServerMBean_CachingStub.updateDeployments(
              > > ServerMBean_CachingStub.java:2977)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.startConfigManager(Appl
              > > icationManager.java:372)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.start(ApplicationManage
              > > r.java:160)
              > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl
              > > .java:636)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:6
              > > 21)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBea
              > > nImpl.java:360)
              > > at
              com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1557)
              > > at
              com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1525)
              > > at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:468)
              > > at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:209)
              > > at $Proxy49.start(Unknown Source)
              > > at
              > >
              weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationManagerMBean_CachingStub.start(
              > > ApplicationManagerMBean_CachingStub.java:480)
              > > at weblogic.management.Admin.startApplicationManager(Admin.java:1234)
              > > at weblogic.management.Admin.finish(Admin.java:644)
              > > at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.start(T3Srvr.java:524)
              > > at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:207)
              > > at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:35)
              > >
              > > ####<Dec 11, 2002 1:23:07 AM GMT> <Info> <EJB> <QAAPP01> <Makalu> <main>
              > > <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name
              > > ASYNCMessageDrivenBean.>
              > >
              > >
              >
              

  • Message Acknowledgement in a Message Driven Bean

    Does the message acknowledgement in a Message driven bean take place after the transaction commits? Will the message be available to be consumed by another instance of the MDB in case the transaction was rolled back? I am using WLS 7.0 as my app server and SonicMQ as JMS provider.
              Thx.
              Ajanta.
              

    Yes, ack's are delayed until the transaction commits.
              Yes, the message will be available if the transaction is rolled back.
              "Ajanta Dey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:3ea616e0$[email protected]..
              > Does the message acknowledgement in a Message driven bean take place after
              the transaction commits? Will the message be available to be consumed by
              another instance of the MDB in case the transaction was rolled back? I am
              using WLS 7.0 as my app server and SonicMQ as JMS provider.
              >
              > Thx.
              > Ajanta.
              

  • Create EJB 3.0 Message Driven Bean on a Oracle JMS (AQ)

    Hi, I need to develop a EJB 3.0 Message Driven Bean. The MDB has to work on a Oracle AQ using Oracle JMS. Is there any how-to document giving an example about this issue. Can you give an example how to create the JMS destination in OC4J (how to configure the Oracle JMS AQ in OC4j), issue the JMS destination via annotions (resource injection) in the MDB. Please give me a working example of the MDB and a test client to produce a message. Regards, Arjan Jorritsma

    Check your ejb-jar.xml and see if it has the version of "2.1" there...
    If the application was depending upon EJB 3.0 annotations but it had a ejb-jar.xml that had version set to "2.1" and there was no oracle specific descriptor (orion-ejb-jar.xml) to designate it use the resource adapter; It would expect JMS destination and connection factory that is required for a JMS-MDB set in the ejb-jar.xml. So try to change the ejb-jar.xml to update the version to "3.0", OC4J would have parsed the annotation and combined the metadata with ejb-jar.xml and it would work.
    -Frances

  • Exception in setting up message-driven bean container: [MQJMS1010: not impl

    Problem
    =======
    We are trying to configure and deploy a Message Driven
    Bean to listen on a WebSphere MQ queue, using LDAP to
    share knowledge of the Queue & Connection Factory.
    But when we start the Sun One domain we get an exception:
    javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
    (see log file at the end of this email)
    Can anybody help please ?
    The configuration of the various components are listed
    below:
    WebSphere MQ Configuration
    ==========================
    Version 5.3
    Queue Manager
    QM_Test
    Queues
    PATH_MFP.Case.Request           
         Queue Type:     Local
    Channels
    Channel_Test               
         Channel Type:     Server Connection
         Protocol Type:     TCP/IP
    LDAP configuration
    ==================
    ldap://localhost/o=mqtest
    cn=MFP_LOCAL_Factory
    javaFactory=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactoryFactory
    javaClassName=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory
    javaReferenceAddress=#3#QMGR#QM_Test
    javaReferenceAddress=#6#CHAN#Channel_Test
    javaReferenceAddress=#14#TM#SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE
    cn=MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
    javaFactory=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueFactory
    javaClassName=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueue
    javaReferenceAddress=#9#QU#PATH_MFP.Case.Request
    javaReferenceAddress=#10#QMGR#QM_Test
    EJB configuration
    =================
    ejb-jar.xml
         <message-driven>
    <display-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</display-name>
    <ejb-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-name>
         <ejb-class>nz.co.acc.emi.server.connector.mdb.ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-class>
         <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
    <message-driven-destination>
              <destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
    </message-driven-destination>
         </message-driven>
    sun-ejb-jar.xml
    <ejb>
         <ejb-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-name>
    <jndi-name>MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue</jndi-name>
         <mdb-connection-factory>
              <jndi-name>MFP_LOCAL_Factory</jndi-name>
         </mdb-connection-factory>
         </ejb>
    Sun One configuration
    =====================
    MFPProcessing: JNDI: External Resources
    MFP_LOCAL_Factory          Enabled javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory
         JNDI Name:      MFP_LOCAL_Factory
         Resource Type:     javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory
         JNDI Lookup:     cn=MFP_LOCAL_Factory
         Factoryclass:     com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
         Properties:
              java.naming.provider.url          ldap://localhost:389/o=mqtest
              java.naming.security.authentication     none
    MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue     Enabled javax.jms.Queue
         JNDI Name:      MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
         Resource Type:     javax.jms.Queue
         JNDI Lookup:     cn=MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
         Factoryclass:     com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
         Properties:
              java.naming.provider.url          ldap://localhost:389/o=mqtest
    server.xml
    <mdb-container steady-pool-size="10" pool-resize-quantity="2" max-pool-size="60" idle-timeout-in-seconds="600" monitoring-enabled="true" log-level="FINEST" />
    <jms-service port="1240" admin-user-name="admin" admin-password="admin" init-timeout-in-seconds="30" enabled="true" log-level="FINE" />
    Sun One log file
    ================
    server.log
    [01/Mar/2004:10:06:48] INFO ( 657): CORE1116: Sun ONE Application Server 7.0.0_01
    [01/Mar/2004:10:06:51] INFO ( 657): CORE5076: Using [Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM, Version 1.4.2_01] from [Sun Microsystems Inc.]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:09] INFO ( 657): JMS5023: JMS service successfully started. Instance Name = domain1_MFPProcessing, Home = [C:/Sun/AppServer7/imq/bin].
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:13] INFO ( 657): JTS5014: Recoverable JTS instance, serverId = [100]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:14] INFO ( 657): RAR5060: Install JDBC Datasources ...
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:14] INFO ( 657): RAR5059: Binding [JDBC DataSource Name: jdbc/MfsDataSourceJConn, Pool Name: MFSConnectionPool]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:15] INFO ( 657): JMS5015: Install JMS resources ...
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:47] WARNING ( 657): [EntityContainer] Created EntityContainer....
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:49] INFO ( 657): LDR5010: All ejb(s) of [mfs] loaded successfully!
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] INFO ( 657): MDB00044: Deploying message-driven bean [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean], consuming from [MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] FINE ( 657): Messages delivery is part of a container-managed tx
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] FINE ( 657): emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean:reconnect-delay-in-seconds=60, reconnect-max-retries=60, reconnect-enabled=true
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:53] INFO ( 657): MDB00028: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Message-driven bean container using external connection factory object: [com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean: Setting message-driven bean pool max-pool-size=60, steady-pool-size=10, pool-resize-quantity=2, idle-timeout-in-seconds=600
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Initializing server session factory
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] INFO ( 657): MDB0001: Create message-driven bean pool with maximum pool size [60], bean idle timeout [600] seconds
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): MDB00030: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Exception in setting up message-driven bean container: [MQJMS1010: not implemented]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): MDB00018: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Closing message-driven bean container connection
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] WARNING ( 657): [AbstractPool]: Cancelled pool timer task at: Mon Mar 01 10:07:55 NZDT 2004
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): MDB00017: [ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Exception in creating message-driven bean container: [javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): javax.jms.JMSException
    javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.services.ConfigEnvironment.newException(ConfigEnvironment.java:418)
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnection.createConnectionConsumer(MQQueueConnection.java:602)
         at com.sun.enterprise.jms.ConnectionWrapperBase.createConnectionConsumer(ConnectionWrapperBase.java:151)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.doSetup(MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.java:67)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperBase.setup(MessageBeanHelperBase.java:419)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanContainer.<init>(MessageBeanContainer.java:206)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.ContainerFactoryImpl.createContainer(ContainerFactoryImpl.java:173)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractLoader.loadEjbs(AbstractLoader.java:345)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLoader.load(ApplicationLoader.java:81)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractManager.load(AbstractManager.java:134)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLifecycle.onStartup(ApplicationLifecycle.java:168)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationServer.onStartup(ApplicationServer.java:269)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.J2EERunner.confPostInit(J2EERunner.java:162)
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): EJB5090: Exception in creating EJB container [javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): appId=emi moduleName=emiEjb_jar ejbName=ServerMessageDrivenBean
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): LDR5004: UnExpected error occured while creating ejb container
    javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.services.ConfigEnvironment.newException(ConfigEnvironment.java:418)
         at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnection.createConnectionConsumer(MQQueueConnection.java:602)
         at com.sun.enterprise.jms.ConnectionWrapperBase.createConnectionConsumer(ConnectionWrapperBase.java:151)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.doSetup(MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.java:67)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperBase.setup(MessageBeanHelperBase.java:419)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanContainer.<init>(MessageBeanContainer.java:206)
         at com.sun.ejb.containers.ContainerFactoryImpl.createContainer(ContainerFactoryImpl.java:173)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractLoader.loadEjbs(AbstractLoader.java:345)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLoader.load(ApplicationLoader.java:81)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractManager.load(AbstractManager.java:134)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLifecycle.onStartup(ApplicationLifecycle.java:168)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationServer.onStartup(ApplicationServer.java:269)
         at com.iplanet.ias.server.J2EERunner.confPostInit(J2EERunner.java:162)
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] WARNING ( 657): CORE5021: Application NOT loaded: [emi]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] INFO ( 657): WEB0100: Loading web module [mfs:mfs.war] in virtual server [MFPProcessing] at [mfs]
    [01/Mar/2004:10:08:31] INFO ( 657): HTTP3072: HTTP listener http-listener-1 [http://ch042dysz0405:1080] ready to accept requests
    [01/Mar/2004:10:08:31] INFO ( 657): CORE3274: successful server startup
    [01/Mar/2004:10:08:33] INFO ( 657): CORE5053: Application onReady complete.

    Hi,
    You have not created the jms destination queue object
    jms/Warehouse
    Your server logs says it cannot find the destination queue object.It has got nothing to do with jndi name of your bean
    Create jms destination queue object using
    asadmin>create-jms-resource instance <instance_name> resourcetype javax.jms.Queue --property imqDestinationName=<NAme>  jms/Warehouse
    Then use list-jms-resources <instance_name> to
    find if jms/Warehouse destionation queue object has been created.
    Get back in case of any issues

Maybe you are looking for