Message mapping problem when testing

Hi guys,
I'm having a tiny little problem with a message mapping.
When I'm testing a message mapping I'm getting the following error:
12:28:35 Start of test
Cannot produce target element /ns1:MT_Encomenda/Num_doc. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
12:28:36 End of test
I'm importing a xml file for testing, but if I fill in the files at hand using the xml instance i get no problems.
Any ideas?

hi,
make sure the target field /ns1:MT_Encomenda/Num_doc is getting populated from the source message.
you would see this error if a required field in the target structure is not populated.
cheers,
naveen

Similar Messages

Port problem when testing bsps (sso)

Hi Forum,
I am facing a problem when testing bsps or wd4a.
When testing an app, first of all the sicf service "myssocntl" gets called. This service listens under port 50077. But when testing the bsp app port 57700 gets called.
Any ideas, where I can customize these ports?
Thank you!

hi,
check your instace profile and chage the icm/server_port_0 value u can change.
thanks
ajai

Message mapping hangs when selecting communication channel

Hi Experts,
I have a strange problem. In message mapping, there is an RFC Lookup. For this RFC lookup, there is one parameter of type communication channel. I want to test this message mapping. So, I go to the Test tab and browse for all available communication channels. When I select a channel and click on Select, ESR hangs. I am not getting why this is happening. Please help me get rid of this problem.
Thanks,
Netrey

Hi,
Got solution for this problem. Below is the communication from SAP on this issue,
Please apply the latest patch levels for the PI components, following
the steps below:
http://service.sap.com/swdc
1. Software Downloads - SAP Software Distribution Center
2. Support Packages and Patches - Entry by Application Group
3. SAP NetWeaver and complementary products - SAP NETWEAVER PI
4. SAP NETWEAVER PI 7.1 - Entry by Component
5. Process Integration. The components that should be updated are:
ESR 7.10
MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.10
XI ADAPTER FRAMEWORK 7.10
XI ADAPTER FRAMEWORK CORE 7.10
XI TOOLS 7.10
Thanks and Regards,
Netrey

Message Mapping Problem with UTF-16LE Encoded XML

Hello,
we have the following scenario:
IDoc > BPM > HTTP Sync Call > BPM > IDoc
Resonse message of the HTTP call is a XML file with UTF-16LE processing instruction. This response should then be mapped to a SYSTAT IDoc. However the message mapping fails "...XML Parser: No data allowed here ...".
So obviously the XML is not considered as well-formed.
When taking a look at SXMB_MONI the following message appears: "Switch from current encoding to specific encoding not supported.....".
Strange thing however is if I save the response file as XML and use the same XML file in the test tab message mapping is executed successfully.
I also tried to use a Java Mapping to switch encodings before executing message mapping, but the error remains.
Could the problem be, that the codepage UTF-16LE is not installed on the PI system ? Any idea on that ?
Thank you!
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Feb 2, 2010 2:29 PM
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Feb 2, 2010 2:29 PM

Hi,
thank your for your answer.
This is what I have tried to achieve. I apply the java conversion mapping when receiving the response message - i tried to convert the response to UTF-16, UTF-8 but none of them has helped to solve the problem.
I guess that using adapter modules is not an option either as it would modify the request message, but not the response, right?

MESSAGE MAPPING PROBLEM PLS HELP

hi forum i have a problem in message mapping...
i have a file to file scenario...with a BPM..
the components are:
1. one outbound async MI:-> MI_OA_fileSender
2. one abstract async MI:-> MI_AA_fileSender
the above two has messsage structure as:
<ns0:MT_sourceFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1...1
 <record> 1..unbound
 <batch_num/> 1..1
 <quantity/> 1..1
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_sourceFile>
3. one abstract async MI: -> MI_AA_fileDestination
4. one inbound async MI:-> MI_IA_fileDestination..
the above two has messsage structure as:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_destinationFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1..1
 <record> 1..unbound
 <rec_number/> 1...1
 <qty/> 1...1
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_rana3_destinationFile>
inside the BPM i m doing a simple one to one interface mapping between MI_AA_fileSender and MI_AA_fileDestination AND then use a send step to send it to receiver service. But inside the graphical editor, for the message maaping in the interface mapping, i change the target structure a bit by duplicating <rec_number> making it:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_destinationFile xmlns:ns0="http://zpoc.com.test/rana3">
 <recordset> 1..1
 <record> 1.. unbound
 <rec_number/> 0..1
 <rec_number/> 0..1 //did right click and "duplicate sub-tree, so it becomes 0...0"
 <qty/>
 </record>
 </recordset>
</ns0:MT_destinationFile>
But i dont change the original structure of MT_destinationFile.
Now in the resultant file in the receiver side i recive two <rec_number> tags....
but since i didnt change the original structure of MT_destinationFile.....but i only made a change in the mapping by duplicating the node <rec
_number>(right click and done "duplicate sub tree").............SHOULD IT NOT THROW AN ERROR
Message was edited by:
 sudeep dhar
Message was edited by:
 sudeep dhar

>.............SHOULD IT NOT THROW AN ERROR
Not necessarily.
See, XI won't realize, by default, a schema validation in your messages. If you want a validation, you'll have to implement one, as described in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c4/e1343e8c7f6329e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
However, for some particular steps in BPM, I have observed that an invalid XML will some times result in a error in BPM execution. In particular, if you have switch steps, container operation steps and/or correlations where you use a particular field of that message, it may throw some exception when you have an invalid xml. Also, I have observed some errors with conditional receiver determination for invalid messages.
As a best practice, if you have any kind of dependency on a particular message inside your system (like switches, container operations, correlations, condition in receiver or interface determination etc), it is a good idea to implement a schema validation.
Also, if you do want to create a thrustable scenario, you might want to perform schema validation for all your output messages.
Regards,
Henrique.

Request Message Mapping Problem

Hello friends,
I am working in XI 2.0 and
my senario is sap R/3->XI->File Adapter
I take an idoc from the SAP R/3 system. and that comes properly to XI. I already created Data type, Message Type,
Interface Type, Message Mapping and Interface Mapping in Desing. and all the configuration part.
but when i send an idoc to XI system and check in SXMB_MONI at that time it shows me a green flag. means Inbound is Proper but It does not execute further steps.
like Request Message Mapping, Call Adapter, Response.
Can any one help me to solve this situation..
Thanks in Advance.

hi Shankar,
I am able to solve the previous problem. by restarting my m/c.
Now if any one know that how to configure RFC adapter.
it always give me error like.
Attempt to start RFC adapter failed: com/sap/mw/jco/JCO$Record
And this is due to I am not able to connect to other R/3 system.
In SM59 transaction
AI_RFCADAPTER_JCOSERVER - TCP/IP connection
when i register my program id to Xmb2RfcService
then it gives me error when i am testing my connection.
program Xmb2RfcService not registered / CPI-C error CM_ALLOCATE_FAILURE_RETRY.
so, can any one help me out to solve this problem.
how to register Service in XI.
Thanks,
Gaurav Jain
Message was edited by: Gaurav Jain

Message Mapping Problem

HI I am calling a Java Mapping Prog from My message Mapping . I get A strange Message when i pass special characters like '?' or '*' through my message mapping to the java mapping .
The Message is "For input string : ???". when i pass ??? as a parameter to the java mapping. I am bit confused. Is This message a standard message that XI gives or is it getting generated from somewhere else.
regards
Nilesh .

Hi Nilesh ,
Test the java mapping program using a seperate main class in some editor ( eg. Eclipse or NWDS) ,
Try to debug the program and u will get to know the cause , as to whr the message is getting generated ,
Regards ,
Sushil

Message mapping problem: BAPI with range table parameters

A kind hello to all,
I try to call the BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST in a 4.70 system via RFC connector. The configuration already works with another BAPI. With this here I get message mapping exception:
Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Zielelement /ns1:BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST kann nicht angelegt werden. Prüfen Sie, ob die XML-Instanz für die Ausgangs-XSD und die Zielfeldzuordnung die Anforderungen der Ziel-XSD erfüllt. at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start
(How can I switch the trace language to English easily? I try to translate:
"BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST cannot be created. Check if the XML instance meets the requirements for the output XSD and the destination field mapping meets the requirements of the destination XSD.")
But the mapping test tool in the Integration Builder Design does not report any warning or error.
My guess is that the problem lies in the parameter structure of the BAPI_ALM_ORDERHEAD_GET_LIST: I have to fill the IT_RANGES selection range table, so it looks as if I need several instances of the item in the corresponding XML. Can I use "Duplicate tree" in the mapping editor? Here I got another exception?
Many thanks for any help!
Regards,
Carsten

Hi Udo,
you gave the final hint, indeed I used a XML file that was not evidently not compliant to the message type I created (even though it had been validated by Altova XMLspy).
From now onwards I only use the "Create instance" function of the test tool to create the XML body of my test messages...
Thanks a lot,
and best regards,
Carsten

Getting Java mapping errors when testing my Interface mapping

Hi,
I'm trying to test my interface mapping from IR, I keep getting these exceptions. All I'm doing in my interface mapping is I have two mapping programs a XSLT mapping with java helper functions with the XSL and a message mapping. In the test it pass thru the XSLT mapping but fails at Message mapping and throws the following exception. Any help on this is really appreciated.
10:03:26 Start of test
Call XSLT processor with stylsheet com/earthlink/xi/mapping/xmlc_to_crm_resp.xsl.
START APPLICATION TRACE ***
Response:
0
END APPLICATION TRACE ***
Returned form XSLT processor.
Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_XMLC_RESP_
Error during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_XMLC_RESP_
java.lang.NullPointerException at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.exceptionCaught$(AMappingProgram.java:59) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.Transformer.checkParserException(Transformer.java:182) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.Transformer.start(Transformer.java:149) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.execute(AMappingProgram.java:102) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepJavaMapping.execute(RepJavaMapping.java:73) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepSequenceMapping.execute(RepSequenceMapping.java:54) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ibrun.RepMappingHandler.run(RepMappingHandler.java:80) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.rt.MappingHandlerAdapter.run(MappingHandlerAdapter.java:107) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ServerMapService.transformInterfaceMapping(ServerMapService.java:127) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.server.mapping.ServerMapService.transform(ServerMapService.java:104) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceBean.transform(MapServiceBean.java:40) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0.transform(MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0.java:167) at com.sap.aii.ibrep.sbeans.mapping.MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0p4_Skel.dispatch(MapServiceRemoteObjectImpl0p4_Skel.java:104) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.DispatchImpl._runInternal(DispatchImpl.java:320) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.DispatchImpl._run(DispatchImpl.java:198) at com.sap.engine.services.rmi_p4.server.P4SessionProcessor.request(P4SessionProcessor.java:129) at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33) at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
10:03:26 End of test

Joe,
most likely your XSLT is outputting a not well-formed XML message.
Remove message mapping from the mapping list and execute it again, to check output.
Also, for mapping debugging in java enhanced function inside XSLT mappings, use the following:
1st, you need to pass the "inputparam" parameter from the XSLT runtime to the Java function (it needs to be one of the input parameters for the executed java function).
In the Java code itself, implement the following code:
AbstractTrace trace = (AbstractTrace) param.get(StreamTransformationConstants.MAPPING_TRACE);
trace.addInfo("Log your message here!");
where param is the input parameter refering to the inputparam from XSLT.
The AbstractTrace and StreamTransformationConstants classes can be found in the aii_map_api.jar file (used in Java mappings).
Regards,
Henrique.

Message mapping problem / experts needed / UDF?

Hello experts,
I have the following problem in a message mapping:
Source structure is as follows:
- Node a (min 1, max 999)
- Subnode b (min 0, max 999)
- Each Subnode b has the element "number" (1,1)
This structure must be mapped to the following target structure:
- Node c (1,999)
 - Subnode d (0,999)
 - Each subnode d has the following elements:
 - e1
 - e2
 - e3
 - e11
1 Source node a should create 1 target node c.
All numbers in all subnodes b of one source node a should be mapped to the e1, e2,...e11 elements of the target structure. As one target node d can only contain up to eleven numbers, there must be several d nodes.
I have already tried to create a UDF, but it does not work.
Any experts who would like to share their knowledge?
Thanks in advance.
CHRISTOPH
Edited by: Christoph G. on Apr 23, 2008 10:46 PM

Hello again,
meanwhile I have worked hard on it and I have found the solution (just one UDF (queue function) which gets the article numbers as well as constant(targetField). So the UDF covers the creation of the "groups" as well as the mapping of the article numbers.
It was really interesting and it made me ambitious to find the solution myself I do not have access to the system today, but I will post my solution as far as I have access again. Maybe you still want to search for a solution? It really may be fun, just like some kind of a puzzle game.
In order to make it more clear, here comes the source and target structure with an example. Let me once more explain it: In the source, there are positions, each with unlimited article numbers. Each position will create a targetPosition. The node "targetPosition" has the subNode "articlenrs" (unbounded). Articlenrs has 11 differnet elements, calles a1, a2, a3, ..., a11. That means, all article numbers from a source postion should be mapped to "groups of 11 target article numbers". Please be aware the there are 11 differnet target fields for article numbers: a1, a2, ... a11.
I think that' why the solution of Liang Ji and Rohit Kalugade will not work...
SOURCE
<position>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 456 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 123 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 496 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 4783 </articlenr>
 . (unbounded)
</positon>
<position>
 <articlenr> 543 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 865 </articlenr>
 <articlenr> 643 </articlenr>
</positon>
TARGET
<targetPosition>
<articlenrs>
 <a1> 123 </a1>
 <a2> 456 </a2>
 <a3> 4783 </a3>
 <a11> 496 </a11>
<articlenrs>
<articlenrs>
 <a1>4783 </a1>
</articlenrs>
</targetPosition>
<targetPosition>
 <articlenrs>
 <a1> 543 </a1>
 <a2> 865 </a2>
 <a3> 643 </a3>
 </articlenrs>
</targetPosition>
Thanks,
Christoph
Edited by: Christoph G. on Apr 30, 2008 10:20 AM

Message-Mapping Problem with empty queue while testing

Hello,
I want to develope an mapping to an BMEcat-structure. This mapping should be an filter.
My problem is, that everytime I want to check, if my mapping works correct, the queues for the proccessing steps keeps empty.
I filled a test case with all data I needed for the step I want to test (not the whole mapping is ready, but for this step, it is). Now I go to my mapping step an check the queue for the parameters and the queue comes up and displays the correct values. In next step I want to display the queue of an "equalsS"-Step, but this queue keeps empty as all following queues too. Sometimes there is coming up an empty "Processing log"-window.
The problem only comes up, if the target-message is a BMEcat-Structure.
Have you any solution for this behaviour? Or do you need more informations?
Here you can find some Screenshots:
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00113.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00114.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00115.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00116.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00117.jpg
Edited by: Dirk Koch on Feb 6, 2008 12:00 PM

Hello,
thank you for your tip, but the main problem is still existing. As you can see in the next screenshots, I build in your code and I'm sure it normally works fine. Also I filled the "have to"-Fields in the strukture, so that the check-function (F7) delivers an all right.
But still I get no queue results.
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00118.jpg
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/ScreenShot00119.jpg
For tests you can take these informations:
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/Z_RFC_EAN_CHECK_resp.xsd
http://www.gothsite.de/sapscreen/bmecat_2005_XSDs.zip
Edited by: Dirk Koch on Feb 6, 2008 12:56 PM

The mis-mapping problem when upgrading OWB from 11.1 to 11.2.0.2.

Hi all,
Our OWB ETL program was developed initially on OWB 11.1 platform.
Then after upgrading it from 11.1 to 11.2.0.2, several mappings are mismatched in the deployment PL/SQL package as below:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY "MAP_PRODUCT_LIFE_CRT" AS
CURSOR "T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE_c" IS
SELECT
/* T_PRODUCT_LIFE.T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE.INOUTGRP1 */
"T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE"."INS_TYPE" "ORGAN_ID$1",
"T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE"."START_DATE" "HOSPITAL_TYPE$1",
"T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE"."END_DATE" "UNIT_FLAG$1",
"T_T_PRODUCT_LIFE"."LIFE_RATE" "INS_TYPE",
You can see that the field mapping is wrong! We have about 100 mappings, but only some of them go wrong.
We have tried the Metadata Loader and Repository Assistant for the upgrading, but the results are the same.
We have released all OWB patches on 11.2.0.2, but the results are the same.
Please help on it!

Hi David,
Besides the mega patch 10185523, we also have applied other tens of patches, e.g. 10225308, 11671955, 11705023, 1768535, etc.
Now we find that the wrong field mapping just appears in the row-based part of the mapping package. So if the set-based mode works well for the mapping execution, no error will happen. That's why we just found the problems in several mappings.
And one thing is even worse. In the patched OWB 11.2.0.2 env., we tried creating totally new mapping. The result is the same: the wrong field mapping still appears in the row-based part of the mapping package.
So this problem seems not related to the upgrading.
Regards.

Problem when testing ITS (IAC) iView

Hi all,
I have created a service for a T-Code:SMEN.When I test this service I am able to see the 'SMEN' screen, but in the command box if I type any t-code, say "SE38".
The entire screen refreshes but it is not taking me to "SE38"..
I have complete authorizations for all t-codes.
In this service I have the below parameters:
Parameter Name value
~TRANSACTION smen
~GENERATEDYNPRO 1
I have created a IAC iView with this service and even in the preview of this iView, same thing happens.
Can any one give some direction in solving this ..
Thanks in advance
sethu

Michael is right - you should not be using an IAC iView, but a SAP Transaction iView with the SAP GUI type set to "Web GUI".
- Darren
<a href="http://www.fortybeans.com/">blog</a>

Message mapping problem after RFC import in SP14

This never happened in earlier versions. If I make minor changes to RFC structures (ex: add new field) and than reimport, my mapping (in the past) needed adjustments only for the new fields. Now, all fields need to be remapped.
Anyone facing similar issues? Is there any patch for this?
Thank you.

Hi Parimala,
Even it should not happen . But even I have faced this once. But I just added some spaces and activated. It worked for me.
But if you are changing your source structure, then it usally happens. But if it is target then it is not happening.
It is just my views,
Regards,
Moorthy

Message Mapping - problem with target sequence

Hi, I hope somebody can help:
I have already read lots of blog entries and help articles to find a solution but all the tricks with node functions and special conditions didn't help yet.
I would like the sequence of A and B nodes just as is. In the source structure they are on the same level and in the target structure B is subnode of A.
Thank you very much in advance.
Source structure:
Node A
- source fields A
Node A
- source fields A
Node A
- source fields A
Node B
- source fields B
Node A
- source fields A
Node B
- source fields B
Node B
- source fields B
Target structure (desired):
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
However, what I get is:
A
- fields A
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
   B
   - fields B
A
- fields A
A
- fields A
A
- fields A

Hi,
Can u try like this.
Map one to one.
Dont use any node function also dont change any conexts also af any node or element.
But in target,make node B is under node A, and both are 0..unbounded occurence.
Try with this....
Let us know the result.
Babu

Message mapping problem when testing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for