Message: Person is already being processed by user &3 &4

Hi,
The message " Person is already being processed by user &3 &4" is appearing when the approver is trying to approve leave of an employee.
Please help.

It means that the user HR record is locked for editing by another person or that the payroll lock is on.
have a look in SM12 to see if the personnel number is in one of the locks.

Similar Messages

Person is already being processed by user (Myself)

Hi,
I am updating an customized infotype using BDC in user exit ZXPADU02 based on status in infotype 0000, while updating the customized infotype i am getting error as 'Person is already being processed by user(myself). What is this error and how to rectify it ?

Hi!
You can't call a transaction (with BDC) from inside a transaction (in a user-exit).
The call transaction contains a commit work - and this would corrupt the transaction logic of the first transaction. Even if you call something which is not currently locked by the first transaction, you should not do this.
Either make your updates after saving the first transaction or try to change values inside the first transaction in global data (internal tables / structures which will be saved by standard later).
Regards,
Christian

Person is already being processed by user

Hi,
we running a EP 7.0 with ECC 6.0 on ESS (patch level 8) project. When I start in the portal the standard Address maintenance iview and in paralell in the backend, somebody has a exclusive lock on the same record maybe a via PA30 a long trace log appears. Has anybody of you an idea if we could switch it off? Maybe it is possible to reduce the tracelevel somehow. I doubt that this trace will help and enduser a lot.
thx for your help
Hans Georg

Hi Hans,
You can turn off the display of the trace in the Visual Administrator. Go to Server > Services > Configuration Adapter > webdynpro > sap.com > tcwddispwda. Edit the file PropertySheetdefault and set the property DevelopmentMode to false. Then restart your portal. (This is for EP6 but I think EP7 may be the same).
Hope this helps.
Jane

Person is already being processed by in while updating an infotype through

Hi,
I am trying to update custom infotypes through BDC based on status change of employee in infotype 0000 , while the BDC is executing I am getting an error message 'Person is already being processed by - ' What is this error and how to rectify it ?

Hi!
You can't call a transaction (with BDC) from inside a transaction (in a user-exit).
The call transaction contains a commit work - and this would corrupt the transaction logic of the first transaction. Even if you call something which is not currently locked by the first transaction, you should not do this.
Either make your updates after saving the first transaction or try to change values inside the first transaction in global data (internal tables / structures which will be saved by standard later).
Regards,
Christian

IDOC Error V1 042 - Sales document X is currently being processed by user X

Hello Experts,
I am using the IS-Retail solution of SAP and I am facing a IDOC Error which keeps the IDOC in Status 51. I traced the Error Message and it was V1 042. I am using an Inbound IDOC 'SHP_OBDLV_CREATE_STO01' to create the STOs (Deliveries) using the POs and there is a locking issue of the PO giving error message 'Sales document XXX is currently being processed by user XXX'.
I have created a backgroung job using a program to post the STOs using IDOCs that picks up multiple files from Application Server and processes them one by one. Now when 2 or more files use the same PO then this error occus.
I added a couple of minutes of wait time between the file processing but that did not help.
Please let me know if you have faces same situation and what solution did you apply.
Regards,
PS

Hopefully you have fixed this by now, but for anyone else who might be looking at this problem. We had this problem and we had the 2 programs check to see if the other was already runing. If so the program would submit itself for a number of minutes, different for both programs, and then exit. We also, and just before this, checked to make sure that there were not 2 of the running programs running and if so to exit. This was necessary because re-scheduling could put a program in conflict with itself. I hope that this may help someone. We used the join V_OP and searched for the program name, not the job name.
Kevin

Transaction is being processed by user - ITSM WebUI

I have integrated the Test Workbench with ITSM Incident Management. SMIN is customized to YMIN for this purpose.
Now I go to stwb_work and report a defect by clicking on "Create" under status. I am able to create a Message as usual.
Now I click on the message and open the same in WebUI, and try to edit it says "Transaction XXXXXXXX is being processed by user.
I tried closing the Test workbench transaction and still it says the same.
SM12 shows a lock entry for "CRMD_ORDERADM_H" and when I delete the entry, I am able to edit. Is there a way to release this lock after I have exited the message in the stwb_work -> Create Message area?
Also if I finally edit the transaction after some time on the WebUi and change the user status, this is not getting reflected in the test workbench "Message Overview"
Could you kindly let me know what could be a possible reason for this?

Hello Ranjih,
As per note 1821038 - Error "Transaction XXXXXXXXXX is being processed by user XXX" when try to edit message in CRM Web UI have you maintained his ?
For first case:
Please add the below entry which will put the document in "Display" mode after clicking "Save" Button.
Call transaction SM30.
Add an entry to table AGS_WORK_CUSTOM with NAME = 'IM_READONLY_AFTER_SAVE' and VALUE = 'X'.
BR,
K.

Sales order is currently being processed by user CRMREMOTE

Hello everyone,
I am working in R/3 and trying to make a delivery for sales order that moved from CRM to R/3. Error message appears 'The sales order is currently being processed by user CRMREMOTE'.
Appreciate any help.
Kirill.

HI,
Please take it as suggestion.
As your ERP-System is being integrated with CRM-System. It seems that this common document is getting proceesed at CRM-System by some user.
Please consult with CRM-System Admin for the same.
Best regards,
Amit.

Re:'Delivery number is currently being processed by user

Hi,
I am creating new delivery based on sales order and assiging craeted delivery to shipment using VL01N and VT01N.Some times getting error as 'Delivery number is currently being processed by user'. I am using synchrounus
update in BDC.
Can i use 'Commit work and Wait' along with synchrounus update in BDC?
To avoid this error message is there any alternate solution.
Regards,
Suresh Kumar.

i have had the same issues, and niether synchronous update, nor commit and wait work in all cases.
an option would be to enqueue the delivery in between the two steps.
create the delivery, then enqueue the delivery (LIKP, i think) with a wait code on it. the system will wait until the first process releases the lock on the delivery and then give it to you. The lock will be discarded when you do a commit after second step, but for readability, i always dequeue.
this is what we do, and i cannot guarantee it will work for you.

Session session name is being processed by user -

Hi Friends,
I am uploading some data from text file through session method.
when I process it through SM35, it gives me error:-
Session <session name> is being processed by user -
But the data is successfully uploaded through call transaction method.
Can you give me detail why this error is coming during session method.
Regards,
Narendra

Hi,
You will get this error if you try to process a session that is already being processed.
Br,
Advait

Report to show me how many invoices are being processed by users

Hi,
I am currently working as a Accounts Payable Supervisor and I would like to run a report to show me how many invoices are being processed by users in my team.
Currently I am using Transaction F.98 (Posted Docs by user report), but this report includes posting from intercompany so all users will have duplicate invoices showing on this report.
Is there any other report I could run to get the result I am after?
Many thanks
Alex

Hello Alex,
You can also use the GL line item report (FBL3N) with the offsetting accounts (for example GR/IR A/c) which would be posted while posting the invoice. You can display the results with User Name and also can create a layout of your own which can be used time and again.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik
Edited by: Shaubhikg on Nov 10, 2010 6:02 AM

Sales document 400136021 is currently being processed (by user MNAUSHAD (C2

Hi Friends,
   Iam using Mobile Sales and iam getting an error when iam opening the sale order created in laptops
   Scenario : Sale order created in laptop got replicated in CRM and R/3 and delivery got created in
                   R/3.
                   The replicated sales document is not seen in the Document flow in CRM enterprise
                    I could not find any queue's in SMQ2 or in SMQ1 both in R/3 or in CRM.
                    when i open the same sale order in VA02 iam getting the error.
   Sales document 400136021 is currently being processed (by user MNAUSHAD (C2)
   Let me know if any of you has faced the same issue,
   Regards,
   Satish Kumar

Hi Wolfard,
Please find my answers,
1. Does this error also occur when creating a similar sales document in CRM directly (i.e. it is rather a   CRM related issue than mobile related)? - No from CRM enterprise to R/3 i dont find an error- It is more of a Sync issue between Mobile> CRM> R/3.
b) Do you know a user or batch name in CRM resp R/3 with that name mentioned by you?
    I know the user name - but this user name is not at all related.
c) Please be aware that those queues smq1/2 are dynamical i.e. after processing the data the entries were deleted again; only in case of a sys fail the queues would be stopped; in the particular case of waiting for processing in R/3 there would be a queue status "WAITUPDA"
I accept the queues are dynamic and it will deleted after it is processed,, The issue is that i dont find any queue in SMQ1 in R/3 and also in SLG1 on that particular date i could find the Log number with the error
With the help of Log error i can find out the sale order.
Trust it is ok
satish

While processing C015 - Getting Error 'Reservation 000005089 is already being Processed "

Hello,
I have created a customized Program script which will process MB1A , MIGO and CO15 simultaneously
MB1A - using BAPI
MIGO and CO15 using BADI
When i process for few records everything works fine. But when i process for 2000 records , after processing i am getting error at C015 "Reservation 000005089 is already being Processed".
I tried with wait time up to 8 seconds after MB1A , still i am getting same error.
Can any one suggest how to fix the issue.
BR,
Murali

Hi Murali,
do a wait loop before calling CO15 like:
locked = 'X'.
do.
    wait up to 5 seconds.
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EMRKPF'
      EXPORTING RSNUM = your_rsnum
                 X_RSNUM = 'X'
      EXCEPTIONS FOREIGN_LOCK     = 2
                 SYSTEM_FAILURE   = 3.
    if sy-subrc                 EQ 0.
      clear                         locked.
      CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_EMMKPF'.
      exit.
    endif.
enddo.
Regards,
Klaus

How can you tell if a process step is already being processed?

Further to my last note regarding assigned a process step to multiple users, how can you determine if the step is currently being processed by another user? When opening a task which has already been opened by another user, the message "The following action has been opened by another 1 user(s)...."
I would like to prevent the second user from making any changes to the object if it's already been opened by another user, hence this request.
Thx!

Top Right hand corner of the Safari window you will see a padlock. This shows it's secure.
Otherwise, you are pretty much working on trust. If you want to purchase something online and the site takes you through a paypal based checkout, it's fairly standard practice.

Can't get rid of a TX - message keeps appearing and being processed by OSB

I have some sort of a poison message or TX I can't flush. Every 10 seconds I get a log message like the second one below, and the number of pending messages in multiple places and OSB proxy service messages processed keep climbing - all without producing any new messages on my part. I've tried deleting the default server store on the OSB managed server and the filestore for the JMS server. No luck.
When this first started happening, the error messages looked like the first one below. Something I did caused the change, I assume. However, it's the same TX ID throughout.
So, first, how can I get rid of this thing? It's driving me nuts and keeping me from closing out a POC.
Second, why is it happening? I have one suspicion - could it be because that somehow we configured mutiple domains with the same name for a distributed application? It's not my normal practice but it happened. These domains don't communicate directly, but there are domains that need to communicate with both. So I'm guessing the name ambiguity may be hurting us. Just a guess, though.
In this case, the sgosb domain's proxy service (this domain name is unique) is receiving messages from a queue resident in the pega_domain in Singapore and another proxy service is putting a message to another queue in the pega_domain in the UK. This is not in a single TX; the first proxy service forwards the message to a queue in the sgosb_domain, the second proxy service gets that message and puts it into the other pega_domain. It's an XA TX for each proxy service.
Just to make it more fun, the sgosb_domain has another proxy service reading from a different queue and forwarding it to a queue in the third pega_domain in the US.
TIA for any help or insight.
Oh yes, the OSB domain is WLS 10.3.4, while the pega_domains are WLS 10.3.2
Original error message
####<Apr 13, 2011 4:32:13 AM GMT> <Error> <EJB> <sg01app510> <sgosb_1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'>
<<anonymous>> <> <92f54a30d60e6302:-4b6d523c:12f4cfeaabc:-8000-0000000000000123> <1302669133597> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of
transaction Xid=BEA1-039B0B6D3D0E77C1B135(1898471720),Status=Rolled back. [Reason=Unknown],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since
begin=0,seconds left=600,XAServerResourceInfo[WLStore_pega_domain_ProcessEventJMS_Store_mgd1]=(ServerResourceInfo[WLStore_pega_domain_ProcessEventJMS_Store_mgd1]=
(state=new,assigned=none),xar=null,re-Registered = false),SCInfo[sgosb_domain+sgosb_1]=(state=rolledback),SCInfo[pega_domain+pega_1]=(state=rolledback),properties=
({}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=sgosb_1+152.64.128.243:22110+sgosb_domain+t3+, XAResources={eis/tibjms/Topic,
WLStore_sgosb_domain_FileStore_auto_1, eis/aqjms/Queue, eis/wls/Queue, eis/tibjms/Queue, WLStore_sgosb_domain__WLS_sgosb_1, eis/AQ/aqSample, eis/aqjms/Topic,
eis/pramati/Queue, eis/sunmq/Queue, WLStore_sgosb_domain_WseeFileStore_auto_1, WLStore_sgosb_domain_MesssageForwardingJMS_Store_mgd1,
WSATGatewayRM_sgosb_1_sgosb_domain, eis/jbossmq/Queue, eis/activemq/Queue, eis/fioranomq/Topic, eis/tibjmsDirect/Topic, eis/wls/Topic,
eis/tibjmsDirect/Queue, eis/Apps/Apps, eis/webspheremq/Queue},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=pega_1+nj09mhm5078:22111+pega_domain+t3+):
javax.transaction.RollbackException: This transaction does not exist on the coordinating server. It was probably rolled back and forgotten.
        at weblogic.rjvm.ResponseImpl.unmarshalReturn(ResponseImpl.java:234)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicRemoteRef.invoke(BasicRemoteRef.java:223)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.CoordinatorImpl_1032_WLStub.commit(Unknown Source)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl$1.run(TransactionImpl.java:331)
        at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
        at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.SecureAction.runAction(SecureAction.java:72)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:327)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:252)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:239)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:553)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:424)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:326)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4659)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4345)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.executeMessage(JMSSession.java:3821)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.access$000(JMSSession.java:115)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:5170)
        at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)
Caused by: javax.transaction.RollbackException: This transaction does not exist on the coordinating server. It was probably rolled back and forgotten.
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.CoordinatorImpl.commit(CoordinatorImpl.java:94)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.CoordinatorImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:589)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:477)
        at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
        at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:473)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
The error message I'm getting now
####<Apr 13, 2011 4:51:38 AM GMT> <Error> <EJB> <sg01app510> <sgosb_1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '18' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <>
<92f54a30d60e6302:-42808c28:12f4d3173cb:-8000-0000000000000032> <1302670298730> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of transaction
Xid=BEA1-0011D0679BA5074B8E12(1930603846),Status=Rolled back. [Reason=javax.transaction.xa.XAException],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=0,seconds
left=60,XAServerResourceInfo[WLStore_sgosb_domain_MesssageForwardingJMS_Store_mgd1]=(ServerResourceInfo[WLStore_sgosb_domain_MesssageForwardingJMS_Store_mgd1]=
(state=rolledback,assigned=sgosb_1),xar=WLStore_sgosb_domain_MesssageForwardingJMS_Store_mgd1239571724,re-Registered =
false),XAServerResourceInfo[WLStore_pega_domain_ProcessEventJMS_Store_mgd1]=(ServerResourceInfo[WLStore_pega_domain_ProcessEventJMS_Store_mgd1]=
(state=rolledback,assigned=pega_1),xar=null,re-Registered = false),SCInfo[sgosb_domain+sgosb_1]=(state=rolledback),SCInfo[pega_domain+pega_1]=(state=rolledback),properties=
({}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=sgosb_1+152.64.128.243:22110+sgosb_domain+t3+, XAResources={eis/tibjms/Topic,
WLStore_sgosb_domain_FileStore_auto_1, eis/aqjms/Queue, eis/wls/Queue, eis/tibjms/Queue, WLStore_sgosb_domain__WLS_sgosb_1, eis/AQ/aqSample, eis/aqjms/Topic, eis/pramati/Queue, eis/sunmq
/Queue, WLStore_sgosb_domain_WseeFileStore_auto_1, WLStore_sgosb_domain_MesssageForwardingJMS_Store_mgd1, WSATGatewayRM_sgosb_1_sgosb_domain, eis/jbossmq/Queue, eis/activemq
/Queue, eis/fioranomq/Topic, eis/tibjmsDirect/Topic, eis/wls/Topic, eis/tibjmsDirect/Queue, eis/Apps/Apps, eis/webspheremq/Queue},NonXAResources=
{})],CoordinatorURL=sgosb_1+152.64.128.243:22110+sgosb_domain+t3+): weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Unknown reason
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1881)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:345)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:239)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:553)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:424)
        at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:326)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4659)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4345)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.executeMessage(JMSSession.java:3821)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.access$000(JMSSession.java:115)
        at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:5170)
        at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:528)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)
Caused by: javax.transaction.xa.XAException
        at weblogic.store.gxa.internal.GXAResourceImpl.prepare(GXAResourceImpl.java:1227)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1295)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:500)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.startPrepare(ServerSCInfo.java:380)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:2593)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1321)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.SubCoordinatorImpl.startPrepare(SubCoordinatorImpl.java:183)
        at weblogic.transaction.internal.CoordinatorImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:589)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:477)
        at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
        at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:473)
        at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
        at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
.>Edited by: SteveElkind on Apr 13, 2011 5:50 AM

Tom,
Thanks! Succinct and easy to understand as ever.
Yup, that covers it - I had also just seen this in the docs after looking at atheek1's earlier response (thanks to him/her as well). It's covered almost as clearly there as you state it here (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11035_01/wls100/jta/trxcon.html).
While the ESB domains meet all of those requirements (except for cross-domain security configuration), each of the other two sets of domains (3 in each set) do not meet the naming uniqueness criteria for domain and server names; they do for JMS server names. I saw the store names in the TX identifier string as included resource, and assumed they might play a part - that's why I changed them. As you say, an unnecessary change. Oh well - it was an easy one.
My normal practice has been for unique names in the past, due to problems I had years ago with cross-domain JMS traffic in an earlier WLS version. I guess it's the wrong time to have forgotten that lesson.
Does anyone know of a quick way of changing a domain name quickly without rebuilding the domain? In the past WLST resulted in incomplete copies for me, is that still a problem? Server names are easy, just some global search-and-replace in the config.xml file (and in the management scripts, too)
/Steve

Unlocking Transactions - "Transaction is being processed by user"

Hi Forum
Besides SM12, how else can we unlock business transctions in CRM?
Ive tried executing CRM_CHECK_DISTRIBUTION_STATUS. I put in Transaction number and type but still transaction is locked. I checked and unchecked before executing
Tried using remove_distr_lock but also not helping
Please advice
Ravi

Hi
Unfortunately I dont have access to SM01
Under SM04, that specific user and transaction is not coming up at all
Ravi

Message: Person is already being processed by user &3 &4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for