Message Prioritization PI 7.1

Hi All,
I want to know how exactlyfunctionality of Message Prioritization of PI 7.1 and the type of scenario in which it can be seen exactly in real time ?
I have read all the onling help on this topic and now expect practical examples and explanation
Thanks,
Amit

PI7.1 features refer this blog:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706005a3-3bd6-2910-91ae-a2016239bdcf
Advanncements of PI 7.1
1. Enterprise Services Repository as a central storage location for enterprise service definitions and lifecycle management data for all enterprise services (Concept of Folders,.
Using Folders in PI 7.1
Using Folders in PI 7.1
2. Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) 3.0u2013compliant services registry for runtime management of enterprise services.
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
3. Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture (ESOA), Global Data Types, Modeling Tool Concept.
ESOA BASICS
SAP Architecture u2013Enterprise SOA Basics
SAP Architecture –Enterprise SOA Basics
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
ESA = SOA + ES ?
ESA = SOA + ES ?
PRINCIPAL PROPAGATION
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
4. Improved support for standards such as Web Service Reliable Messaging (WS-RM), WS Policy, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML).
5. Support Business Activity Monitoring (BAM).
XI: BAM - Episode III - new super trace
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode II - Simple Proactive monitor
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode I - Introduction s
The specified item was not found.
6. Advanced Adapter Engine Features (Eg. Bypass Integration Engine Process)
7. Enhancement for Mapping (Eg. Re-usable User Defined Functions, Look-up function reads multiple fields, Specify mapping parameters at configuration time, Synchronous DB RFC lookups, Message Packing etc.)
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
MAPPING LOOK UPS
Lookupu2019s in XI made simpler
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/23/lookup146s-in-xi-made-simpler
XI: RFC Mapping lookups (from BC to XI?)
The specified item was not found.
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
SAP XI Lookup API: the Killer
The specified item was not found.
mapping look ups RFC api
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a03e7b02-eea4-2910-089f-8214c6d1b439
RFC Look up from XSLT mapping
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/05a3d62e-0a01-0010-14bc-adc8efd4ee14
Data Lookup Optimized
Data Lookup Optimized
8. Extended support for high volume scenarios
huge processing of files
Night Mare-Processing huge files in SAP XI
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
SAP XI acting as a (huge) file mover
The specified item was not found.
Managing bulky flat messages with SAP XI (tunneling once again) - UPDATED
The specified item was not found.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
9. Business Activity Monitoring for process definition of milestone monitoring (event correlation).
10. Improved SAP NetWeaver Administrator support for central configuration and administration of both mediated and point-to-point scenarios.
11. XML payload validation and validations using JAVA.
VALIDATING MESSAGES
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
SOA Middleware: XML validation error handling
SOA Middleware:  XML validation error handling
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Xml validation
XML Validation BPM:
VALIDATING INCOMING FLAT FILE
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
BPM:
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
12. Process editor modeling enhancements: step groups, integrated alert management and configurable parameters.
13. Integration of human interaction (generic user decision).
14. Language dependent texts for end-user display.
15. WS-BPEL 2.0 adoption (Preview and implementation BPEL4People, BPLE-SPE Simple User Defined Functions can be configured directly in the process.)
Also refer this links for more clarifications:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/369142f195675ee10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/fb4cd3207c7063e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f36ce30f-0e01-0010-a89b-c158d07c44ff
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ec19c05d-0501-0010-09a2-b6db51b5318d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5441afe5-0601-0010-dba5-dc5f9d5caa9d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c50cddbb-0601-0010-92a7-f2a40ca68e6d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f027dde5-e16e-2910-97a4-f231046429f2
Refer these threads as well:
Advantages of using PI 7.1 over PI 7.0
PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
http adaptor on which factors we will use
Diff between XI and PI
differences between xi 3.0 and pi 7.0
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
give me main advantages of XI-7.0 TO XI-3.0
XI 7.0 vs Xi 3.0
XI/PI
XI vs. PI
XI 3.0 vs. PI (XI 7.0)
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
moving from XI 3.0 to PI 7

Similar Messages

  • NWA PI Message Prioritization

    Trying to use PI Message Prioritisation and I get the following message when logging onto NWA and selecting SOA Management   Monitoring   PI Message Prioritization. I
    Message prioritization data provider not registered for this PI
    have searched SDN, SAP Support and Google without any luck. Nothing I can find contains information on configuraing Message Prioritisation in NWA.
    We are running 7.1 EHP1 SP3. 
    Any help that can be offered would be appreciated....

    HI,
    Interesting link regarding message prioritisation in RTWB. It appears to be a very simple method of prioritising messages but may prove useful. I'm still interested to know whats wrong with NWA. I have seen all the other links....
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/48/b2e00f6b156ff4e10000000a42189b/frameset.htm
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0b96675-87cf-2c10-b489-dee0ac03f782?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/media/streamingmedia/events/sap-teched-2009/sessions/soa-middleware/soa203%20general%20performance%20tuning%20with%20sap%20netweaver%20process%20integration/soa203.pdf
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70b8adc3-728c-2a10-7fad-d43f29074ef8?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/media/streamingmedia/events/sap-teched-2007/virtual%20teched%2007/no%20virtual%20track/epi214%20sap%20netweaver%20process%20integration-advanced%20adapter%20engine/epi214.pdf
    Regards

  • How to handle message prioritization in interface determination

    Hi Experts,
    How to handle the prioritization of messages if we say that for single source message it will be forwarded to 2 types of target messages.
    Here's the scenario:
    InterfaceDetermination object
    SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeA
    SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeB
    Since both of the target messages will receive the source message, i want to prioritize that TargetMessageTypeB will be receive it first before TargetMessageTypeA.
    Should I structure it in the Interface Determination as this:
    SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeB
    SourceMessageA => TargetMessageTypeA
    or this should be handled by BPM? Let say BPM is the last option how could this be configured in ID?
    Cheers,
    R-jay

    Hello Folk,
    you have once option in the interface determination check the maintanence order at runtime , it will solve your problem.
    regards,
    Ravi.

  • Message prioritization

    Hello,
    We need to implement prioritization for messages going from B2B to BPEL. The client will have a very large number of incoming messages of different types. Some are more important than others and must be handled in a timely way. If the system is overloaded the most important messages should be processed by BPEL first.
    Even better would be to prioritize before the messages are picked up by B2B, but as far as we can see that is not possible without writing something that sits in front of B2B and we don't want that.
    Is it possible to control the AQ priority so that B2B uses a different priority for messages that fulfill some criteria (for example that have a specific EDIFACT type)?
    If not our current design is to read the messages from the standard AQ queue and put them on a new one in a PL/SQL program or using the ESB, setting priority in the new queue. The BPEL code would then read from the new queue. Does that sound reasonable, or is there a better way?
    Thanks in advance for any pointers,
    -Erik

    Hello,
    We need to implement prioritization for messages going from B2B to BPEL. The client will have a very large number of incoming messages of different types. Some are more important than others and must be handled in a timely way. If the system is overloaded the most important messages should be processed by BPEL first.
    Even better would be to prioritize before the messages are picked up by B2B, but as far as we can see that is not possible without writing something that sits in front of B2B and we don't want that.
    Is it possible to control the AQ priority so that B2B uses a different priority for messages that fulfill some criteria (for example that have a specific EDIFACT type)?
    If not our current design is to read the messages from the standard AQ queue and put them on a new one in a PL/SQL program or using the ESB, setting priority in the new queue. The BPEL code would then read from the new queue. Does that sound reasonable, or is there a better way?
    Thanks in advance for any pointers,
    -Erik

  • Sync messages should have higher prioritization in IE than async messages

    Hi there,
    does somebody know how I can assign a higher prioritization to sync messages than to async messages in XI 3.0? In case of a bottleneck on the Integration Engine I want to get sync messages processed first. Message prioritization in SXMB_ADMIN does not work because it's ony applicable for async (EO / EOIO) messages.
    Thank you.
    BR,
    Ralph N.
    UPDATE: Since there doesn't seem to be a solution for this issue let me specify it. What kind of installation can be made in the landscape to separate sync messages physically from async messages?
    Edited by: Ralph Nitschke on Jun 25, 2010 1:58 PM

    hi,
    i found some links, hope those helps you
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/20bb9649-e86e-2910-7aa9-88ed4972a5f6
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/DifferencebetweenSXMB_ADMandSXMB_ADMINISTRATION
    Queue prioritization
    ** Queue Prioritization in SXMB_ADM - Tuning Param  - Whats the difference
    Also try searach in ussing by "queue prioritization" in SDN you will find many links
    Thanks
    Rodrigo P.
    Edited by: Rodrigo Alejandro Pertierra on Jun 25, 2010 10:25 AM

  • Scheduled Status in Message Monitoring

    Hi All,
    We have a scenario from DB- DB using Java Proxies. The Message interfaces are defined as Asynchornously with EO mode.
    Usually the sender channel picks data and tirggers Java Proxy. Proxy process all records and send the status back to sender in 5 mins.
    But when I started multiple interfaces at the same time, I observe that one interface is taking 15 min and while that interface is in processing state, the other interface which started at that time are also in Scheduled status. But the sender channel picks data for every 5 mins, which is creating duplicate records.
    The interfaces which are in Scheduled status are getting processed only after that interface ( taking 15 min) gets processed.
    Why is this dependency on other interfaces and is there any way to avoid this dependency?
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Srini

    you can do queue/message prioritization.
    but I suggest to use one status field in DB, when you are polling DB to select records , immidiately change staus to picked and after processing successfully change it to processed.

  • Proxy messages are stucked in SMQ2.Can I pass these msgs in separate queue?

    Hi Guys,
    File >PI>ABAP proxy. (ECC)
    Once i pick and process the file, the resultant message is updating the table in ECC through ABAP proxy. These messages are high priority and they should not stuck in the queues in ECC.
    The problem is some of the messages of this interface are getting stucked in queues (SMQ2) by colliding with other low priority messages which are failed due to some data issues.
    Is there any way I can separate these high priority messages into separate custom queue and process them?
    Do I need to this in ECC or PI?
    Thanks
    Deepthi

    Hi,
         As Debashis has already said, use message prioritization in PI to handle your requirement.
    For SAP NetWeaver PI 7.0, navigate to SAP NetWeaver 7.0  SAP NetWeaver 7.0 Library  SAP NetWeaver Library  SAP NetWeaver by Key Capability  Process Integration by Key Capability  SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure  Runtime  Integration Engine  Prioritized Message Processing.
    For SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 (including EHP 1), navigate to SAP NetWeaver  SAP NetWeaver PI/Mobile/IdM 7.1  SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 Including Enhancement Package 1  SAP NetWeaver Process Integration Library  Function-Oriented View  Process Integration  Integration Engine  Prioritized Message Processing.
    For more details about message prioritization within the Advanced Adapter Engine, please refer to SAP Help Portal http://help.sap.com, and navigate to SAP NetWeaver  SAP NetWeaver PI/Mobile/IdM 7.1  SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 Including Enhancement Package 1  SAP NetWeaver Process Integration Library  Function-Oriented View  Process Integration  Process Integration Monitoring  Component Monitoring  Prioritizing the Processing of Messages.

  • Queue Prioritization in R3/ECC

    Hi,
    We have prioritize PI queues already. In PI it is more of interface specific queue allocation. If we go to sxmb_adm of R3/ECC, again we could see similar options of managing queues. Do we have some simitar concept in R3/ECC too? e.g. if there a lot of  messages coming to ECC from a low priority PI message, then is there any possibility of sending these messages to specific queues in ECC?
    Kind regards,
    Prateek

    Okay ;o)
    So transfering IDocs via qRFC between systems might be an option for you. But this just guarantees that for example EOIO messages do not overtake one another even during transfer from one system to another.
    IDocs are processed in the ECC system via 2 ways. Either "immidiately" when received, or via "background job" which has to be scheduled. Please see you config per inbound message in ECC in WE20.
    So I guess the prioritization as you need it will not be provided by message prioritization as configurated in XI.
    Kai

  • Webinar:SAP NetWeaver Process Integration u2013 Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7

    +Please Note: This webinar is aimed at consultants, Patners and Customers in APJ Region and is scheduled at  2.00 - 3.00 p.m. Singapore Time (UTC +8)+
    Dear valued SAP Experts,
    Next SAP Intelligence Platform & NetWeaver RIG Expert Call Session will take place on Tuesday, September 1. The SAP Intelligence Platform & NetWeaver RIG Expert Call Sessions are designed to support consultants, partners and customers during their implementation projects. The sessions cover all different aspects of SAP NetWeaver and are aimed at experts, thus provide knowledge which is not available via standard training courses. The session duration is typically 60min and includes questions and answers.
    Tuesday, September 1, 2009:
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration u2013 Advanced Adapter Engine in PI 7.1 EHP1
    Time: 2.00 - 3.00 p.m. Singapore Time (UTC +8)
    This event will feature Charu Goel with the SAP Intelligence Platform & NetWeaver Regional Implementation Group. Charu provides the following abstract:
    With PI 7.1 Enhancement pack 1, we continuously thrive to bring in advancements in AAE. In this APJ expert call, we talk about the much awaited capability of IDOC packaging along with the enhancements in JMS. You will learn about the interaction between the AAE and ABAP stack, new enhancements on the JDBC adapter and overall improvements in the technical adapters available with PI 7.1 EHP1.
    For meeting and Dial-in detail please register [here|http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=qkBfQCM5FM_2f_2b4O0ihVpFRw_3d_3d]
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Sarma Sishta

    Hi,
    This was one of the good session...
    Especially the features such as;
    -- TCP/IP connection control with JMS adapters
    -- Empty file Handling
    -- Set the various Attributes for Mail attachments via dynamic configuration (intially only subject line was possible)
    -- Message Prioritization
    -- single IDOC Ack for IDOC Packaging
    -- IDOC packaging
    -- and many more........................
    Even the future indicatioon of IDOC J2EE based adapter will provide new direction to the existion IDOC related scenarios..
    One thing that was changed in IDOC packaging is to control it via Sender Communication channel...intially we were doing it either via ECC system or with t-code "idxpw"
    Its almost in same way...but from J2EE based adapter perceptive IDOC packaging will be available with Java stack...and will no need to depend only ABAp stack for this feature.
    Thanks
    Swarup

  • Duplicate SOAP Adapter metadata

    we are using PI 7.11 and would like to know whether it is possible\supported to create a copy of the standard SOAP Adapter metadata in the Integration Builder. We would copy it to a different SWC, namespace and name (e.g. Customer_Basis_SWC, http://customer.com....,CustomerSOAP). The requirement behind this is as follows.
    An interface exist between PI and a thrid-party application that causes a large number of timeouts when sending async. SOAP messages to this application. The third-party application can not handle the workload caused by the large number of messages pushed through by SAP PI. The third-party application can not be optimized at this point. We believe the only way around this problem is reducing the number of receiver threads in the SOAP adapter. However by changing the threads on the standard SOAP adapter all other receiver adapters of type SOAP are impacted too. Having a customer\application specific SOAP adapter would probably resolve this issue. We also looked at message prioritization but this wouldn't help in this case either.
    If this approach is possible what steps are involved other than copying the metadata to a different SWC, Name and Namespace. We did try this in our sandpit and got an error in the communication channel monitor saying "No adapter registered for this channel", even so the interface we tested with appeared to work using the new adapter. We did not modify the metadata after it was copied into the new SWC. Is there any other configuration step required to get rid of this error message.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Dieter

    Please check below SAP help on loading metadata.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/65/6f64403899970ae10000000a155106/frameset.htm

  • Sender-specific queue

    Hi
    what is the meaning of sender-specific queue ? how to implement the same ?
    In what way it is different from queue prioritization ?
    thanks
    kumar

    hi,
    I don't know this term (where did you get it)
    but it can only mean two things in XI
    a) with some sender adapters like file adapter
    you can specify quality of service EOIO and put the queue name
    which will be used in the whole flow
    b) with message prioritization you can specify sender/receiver ID
    and then assign a queue to it - but this part you know right ?
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • AE中的优先级是什么原理

    各位专家:
    我看到PI7.11的Runtime Workbench的Component Monitor中有"Message Prioritization"的选项
    它的原理是怎样?
    我现在面临的问题是:
    VA中JDBC设置了20个线程,每天有大概6000条数据插入DB.因为目标DB性能问题,这些数据要花掉半个小时才能处理完!
    这半个小时内,20个线程都被占满了,导致高优先级的消息无法得到立刻处理!
    PI711的"Message Prioritization"能帮我解决这个问题吗,谢谢!
    如果实在不行,我只能将这6000条数据绑定成一个XML了!但是客户目前最希望的是,针对高优先级消息有专用线程,不会被其他接口场景占用! 
    regards
    禹明

  • Oracle Configurations for High User Volume

    Hi,
    Can anyone point me to some resources which discusses choosing a suitable Oracle configuration ?
    Like what configurations are best suited for a high user(5K to 10 concurrent logged in users) Architecture ?
    Regards,
    Amila.

    Hi,
          We can call the stored procedure using receiver adapter using ccBPM, we can follow different approaches for reading the data in this case.
    a) In this  a ccBPM instance needs to be triggered using some dummy message, after receiving this message the ccBPM can make  a sync call to the Oracle database the store procedure(this can be done using the specific receiver data type strucure), on getting the response message the ccBPM  can then proceed with the further steps.The stored procedure needs to be optimized for improving the performance as the mapping complexity will largely get affected by the structure in which the stored procedure returns the message.Prioritization of the objects can be handled in the stored procedure.
    b) In this a ccBPM instance can first read data from the header level table, then it can make subsequent sync calls to Oracle tables for reading data from the child tables.This approach is less suitable for this interface as the number child tables is big.
    Pravesh.

  • Adapter Engine Prioritation for JDBC Adapter

    Hi ,
    I am currently working on an Idoc to Jdbc Scenario. The jdbc adapter is used to push the messages to three different legacy systems through three different scenarios. I need to prioratize the messages of the legacy systems(For Eg. Legacy System A is more critical than Legacy System B) in adapter engine or in adapter itself.
    Regards,
    UserPI

    Hi
    We are having the same problem. Once one of the interfaces which is using a JDBC communication channel is processing a bigger amount of messages, the JDBC adapter seems to be blocked exclusively for that interface. All other interfaces using the JDBC adapter are on hold (status "Scheduled" in Adapter Engine Message Monitoring). I set up message prioritization in RWB (Component: Adapter Engine), but it doesn't help (nothing different from before).
    Does anybody has a hint on that?
    Thanks
    Philippe

  • Oracle database integration with SAP PI for high volume & Complex Structure

    Hi
    We have requirement for integrating oracle database to SAP PI 7.0 for sending data which is eventually transferred to multiple receivers. The involved data structure is hugely complex (around 18 child tables) with high volume processing requirement (100K+ objects need to be processed in 6-7 hours). We need to implement logic for prioritizing the object i.e. high priority objects must be processed first and then objects with normal priority.
    We could think of implementing this kind of logic in database procedures (at least it provides flexibility for implementing data selection logic as well as processed data can be marked as success in the same SP) but since PI sender adapter doesn't support calling Oracle stored procedures currently so this option is rules out. we can try implementing complex data selection using oracle table function but table function doesn't allow any SQL query which changes data (UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE etc) so it is impossible to mark selected objects in table function from PI communication channel "Update Query" option.
    Also, we need to make sure that we are not processing all the objects at once as message size for 20 objects can vary from 100 KB to 15 MB which could really lead to serious performance issues for bigger messages.
    Please share any implementation experience for handling issues:
    1 - Database Integration involving Oracle at sender side
    2 - Complex Data structures
    3 - High Volume Processing
    4 - Controlled data selection from database to contro the message size in PI
    Thanks,
    Panchdev

    Hi,
          We can call the stored procedure using receiver adapter using ccBPM, we can follow different approaches for reading the data in this case.
    a) In this  a ccBPM instance needs to be triggered using some dummy message, after receiving this message the ccBPM can make  a sync call to the Oracle database the store procedure(this can be done using the specific receiver data type strucure), on getting the response message the ccBPM  can then proceed with the further steps.The stored procedure needs to be optimized for improving the performance as the mapping complexity will largely get affected by the structure in which the stored procedure returns the message.Prioritization of the objects can be handled in the stored procedure.
    b) In this a ccBPM instance can first read data from the header level table, then it can make subsequent sync calls to Oracle tables for reading data from the child tables.This approach is less suitable for this interface as the number child tables is big.
    Pravesh.

Maybe you are looking for