Message split via BPM Status stays TBDL

Hi to all,
I have a Scenario with a BPM.
In the IntegrationProcess (IP_Split), is a mapping with message splitting.
The result von the Mapping are serveral Proxymessages and a var count, that counts the new Messages.
After, i have a loop over the messages an with the receiverdetermination i send the new messages to the SAP-System.
the Scenario works fine. in SXI_MONITOR it looks great.
There is only one Problem:
When i go to the Integration Engine in the Message Monitoring (Runtime Workbench) there is a strange Message.
There is a Message with SenderService and ReceiverService IP_Split. The Status is still TBDL.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks
Chris

Hi,
Few months ago we had also problems with "locked user" in XI, in our case XIAPPLUSER was sometimes (b)locked.
Perhaps note:
721548 Changing the passwords of the XI 3.0 service users
will help you.
We removed and entered the service users again, with the password in CAPITALS and language blank.
After that our problem was solved, I hope yours too.
Regards
Jack

Similar Messages

  • Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM

    Hi All,
    Could anyone pls let me know clearly how message mapping can be done for this weblog
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi,
    When you are doing Message mapping after adding the Messaget types for source and target messages. You can click on the "" button in the target message and add one more tab. You can go to Message tab as shown in the 5th image and click "" button to add one more message type. Then do the mapping as usual.
    <b>Based on the value of the element(name), the node of input(details)should be directed to one of the two message types</b>
    Here in this blog it is done based on the Name.
    You need to use IFTHENELSE boolean function and do the mapping.
    Thanks,
    Prakash

  • Multi mapping and message splitting in BPM

    Hi ,
    I am working with this scenario ...
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    how many message interfaces i have to create .
    one outbound , one abstract  and two inbound .. is it correct.

    Hi
    Minimum you need to create three message interfaces i.e. Bpm_In_MI_Abstract,  aBpm_Out_MI_Abstract Bpm_Out1_MI_Abstract, because abstract interfaces can be use inbound and outbound as well.
    You can also use create implement it by using inbound and outbound message interfaces. In that case you have to use three additional interfaces(1 outbound and 2 inbound).
    Regards
    Sami
    Reward points if helpful.

  • Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM UDFs Error

    hi
    As per the below blog
    Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
    I have just modified the UDFs(1.selectnodeifA 2.selectNodeifB)
    1.selectnodeifA
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    2.selectNodeifB
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("B"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    while checking I am getting the following errors
    Source code has syntax error: 
    D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:132: cannot resolve symbol
    symbol : variable n
    location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    ^
    D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:140: cannot resolve symbol symbol : variable n
    location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    ^
    2 errors
    The source code given in the blog is correct ? I thought for loop has not completed
    pls help
    manian

    Hi manian,
    I was having a look to Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure blog.
    The functions are not the same. I mean, yours and blogs functions.
    Each function has two parameters, Name and node. Furtheremore, in the blogs' functions is using arrays and you don't.
    So, the right code will be
    1.selectnodeifA
    for(int i=0;i<=node.length();i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    However, if you don't need an advance user defined function as you want to process just one element of the node's queue, you will not need to use for sentence.
    Something like:
    1.selectnodeifA
    // for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node);
    Hope it is usefull for you.
    Carlos

  • Message Split using BPM for Multiple SOAP Receivers

    hi,
    I have a scenario where in i have to split the message coming from IDOC(SOURCE) to multiple SOAP(TARGET) receivers through BPM
    I took a single file as a scenario and tested it. It worked fine.
    I am using only a single output interface.
    I have followed this weblog
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    but this blog has 2 output interfaces whereas in my case i just only one output interface that i want to route to multiple receivers based on the value in the PARVW in the IDOC.
    Thanks,
    Tirumal

    hi ,
    this is done using CONDITIONAL RECEIVER DETERMIANTION.
    While doing your reciver determiantion, you can specify multiple receivers and also specify the condition on which the receiver is to be choosen.
    Also, just check the last path of this blog for the same,
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Message split using BPM.

    Hi SDNers,
         My Scenario - Multiple IDocs to 3 output messages. Mesg1 1:1, Msg2 0:1, Msg3 0:1
         We are using BPM to acheive this.
               I am doing message split using BPM. But I have a problem when I am using BPM.
         My requirement is to collect the Idocs for 1 minute, this I acheived by using deadline branch and collecting idocs using container. After that I used Transformation step to run interface mapping by which message is splitting into three messages. Upto this I acheived successfully, then after I got strucked to split the message.
         I am using fork step and and giving three branches, in each branch I am giving receive step and collecting the transformed message. My problem is the message in the first branch is mandatory to come, where as the messages in the remaining two branches are not mandatory. That is my message can split into three messages or just one.
         If I use fork step, without getting the message in all the three branches, the messages in the branches will not come out. Which is not satisfying my requirement.
         I am thinking that before receive step in fork, can I use wait step for 1 minute or can anybody explain what is the functionality of necessary branches.
         Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Jayaram.G

    Jayaram.G,
    To send the messages in your fork, you need a send step instead of a receive step.
    I think you also need to insert a switch in al of the fork's branches, so that the messages will ony be sent when the transformation produced the message. (use the expression [message] EX in the switch).
    Kind regards,
    Koen

  • Message Splitting Using BPM

    Hi Folks,
        I'm new to SAP PI 7.0 . I want to send one xml file to 2 sender in a splitted manner using BPM. suppose I have 8 fileld in my sender data type, i want to send the xml which contails first 4 fileds to the first receiver and
    the xml which contails second 4 fileds to the second receiver.
         Can anybody help me in this case.I have already looked for the already answered threads but i didnt get any help from them.
    Thanks & Regards,
       Santosh Kumar Nayak.

    Hi,
    Check this blog: /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    From the blog:
    Three Receiver Determinations are required. One for the Sender to BPM and two
    others for BPM to the corresponding output files. In the Interface Determination for the
    two Receivers, specify the corresponding Interfaces.
    Same logic applicable to your case.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Idoc(receiver) message splitting using BPM

    Hi,
    could you provide some blogs which is useful for Idoc (as a Receiver) message splitting (1:N scenario) using BPM.
    I have gone thru some of the Blogs, i didn't find good one according to this scenario.
    Thanks
    Praba

    Hi Michal,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    You said " if you have one message and want to have multiple IDOCs
    there is no need for a BPM -
    you just need to change IDOC occurance - that's all"
    I agree to your point.
    My scenario is more or less same but "With single message , i need to generate multiple Idocs" based on synchronous proxy response from R3. That is the reason we already gone with BPM.
    Already i used the BPM in my interface due to req.  It was working. Earlier i was posting single Idoc to R3 with multiple Header segment (each Header segment has one quantity)
    Now due to req. change, for each single quantity (quantity is my source Message Type field), i need to post single Idoc to R3  if i get response from R3.
    My XI version PI 7.0 SP14
    Idoc structure:
       <xsd:attribute name="SEGMENT" type="xsd:string" fixed="1" use="required"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
       </xsd:complexType>
    - <xsd:complexType name="WPUWBW.WPUWBW01";>
    - <xsd:annotation>
       <xsd:documentation>POS interface: Upload goods movements</xsd:documentation>
       </xsd:annotation>
    - <xsd:sequence>
      <xsd:element name="EDI_DC40" type="EDI_DC40.WPUWBW.WPUWBW01"; />
       <xsd:element name="E1WPG01" type="WPUWBW01.E1WPG01"; minOccurs="0"
       maxOccurs="9999999999" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
       </xsd:sequence>
       <xsd:attribute name="BEGIN" type="xsd:string" fixed="1" use="required"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
       </xsd:complexType>
       </xsd:schema>
    Already I am using this Idoc structure in various interfaces also. If i edit the occurance of the this Idoc and import in External definition with same name, I feel it afffect mapping in other interfaces also.
    Inputs are highly appreciated.
    Edited by: Prabaharan Rangasamy on May 22, 2009 4:14 PM

  • Message Split without BPM - Error

    Hi,
    I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
    I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
    Error Category : MAPPING
    Error Code : GENERIC
    I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
    Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Hi Venkat,
    I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
    Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
    ============================
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>
    Thanks,
    Sri.

  • Message splitting without bpm

    Could anyone please give any idea or links about end to end configuration for  message splitting without using bpm.
    Thanks
    sabyasachi
    Edited by: Sabyasachi Mohapatra on Apr 7, 2009 11:50 AM

    Hi Sameerr
    .i have one sender  &  2 receivers.Please guide how to configure end to end in the receiver determination step & interface determination step.How many sender & receiver agreements need to be configured.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sabyasachi

  • Message split without BPM?

    Can we do correlation (message merge) without bpm. I mean Is there any adwanced service pack which support this,so that we can avoid bpm?

    Hi,
    Ur subject and ur question is confusing.....
    Message split means splitting the one message into N message that is 1:N
    And message merge is merging the N message to 1 message N:1.
    Wat u want to do...can you pls explain with example.
    Correlation is a functionality provided in BPM.
    Thnx
    Chirag

  • User getting locked while sending message sync via BPM. Please help

    Hi Experts,
       I have a sync - sync scenario where I am sending data synchronously from webservice to a sync RFC FM. I am using BPM and in BPM I have three steps
    1. Receive step - Opens Sync-Async Bridge
    2. Sync Send step
    3. Send step - Closes SYnc-Async bridge.
    This BPM solution is same as that give in the blog https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    When I test this scenario I am getting
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
    <SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
    <SAP:P1 />
    <SAP:P2 />
    <SAP:P3 />
    <SAP:P4 />
    <SAP:AdditionalText />
    <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
    <SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
    <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>
    When I check the "Status monitor for Sync/Async communication" via SXMB_MONI, I found that my message is listed there with BPE status = "Wait".
    On double clicking my message I found that there is an error " User is locked. Please notify the person responsible".
    Why is my BPE struck in "Wait" stage and user is locked?
    What am I doing wrong? Am I missing any settings in SOAP sender communication channel?
    Please help me in resolving this problem.
    Regards
    Gopal

    Hi,
    Few months ago we had also problems with "locked user" in XI, in our case XIAPPLUSER was sometimes (b)locked.
    Perhaps note:
    721548 Changing the passwords of the XI 3.0 service users
    will help you.
    We removed and entered the service users again, with the password in CAPITALS and language blank.
    After that our problem was solved, I hope yours too.
    Regards
    Jack

  • Message splitting in BPM ?

    Hi Guys,
    I have a proxy-soap scenario and i am using BPM to handle the asynchr-synchronus messages.
    The request coming into xi has multiple transactions in a single xml file and i need to split them into individual transacrions.
    I have created a multimapping and i am able to see a seperate messages for each individual transactions. I tried this inititaly with out BPM and able to see all the seperate messages.
    when i use the same mapping in a Transformation step in BPM i am able to see sepeate messages for each transaction but all the messages has the data of the last transaction.
    any help would be appreciated
    Thanks,
    srini

    Hi Raj,
    I have imported the wsdls both for the source and the target and once i have changed the occurance of the target from 0 to unbound the node Messages and Message 1 are added on the top for both the source and target.
    you have previously replied to this concern and said at run time they will be removed and the incoming request mathches with the original wsdl.
    I have tested this mapping with out BPM and i am able to see all the individual messages for each transaction seperately. Now i am using the same mapping in the BPM in a Transformation step and i see 3 messages but all of them have the data of the last transaction.
    Thanks,
    srini

  • Message Splitting with BPM

    Someone knows about an example on splitting a message into several messages (multiline element), the target message type is of one type.

    Hi,
    <i>Someone knows about an example on splitting a message into several messages (multiline element), the target message type is of one type.</i>
    >>>Several messages means several message types ..
    But if you want to get multiple lines then it is called multiple occurences. i.e One message type is having multiple main segments.
    For e.g in this case, one message type with multiple Segment can occur. If this is your requirement, then no need of multiline etc. Just you need to map it correctly.
    <Target>
       <Segment> (1..n)
    </Target>
    If you want multiple messages i.e one then it will be like this
    <Messages>
       <Message1> 1..n
         <Target>
        </Message1>
      <Message1> 1..n
         <Target>
      </Message1>
    </Messages>
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • BPM Configuration in Message Split

    Hi All,
    My scenario 1:2 Message Split is like this....
    Message types: MT_INPUT,MT_OUTPUT1,MT_OUTPUT2.
    Message Interfaces: MI_INPUT(OUTBOUND),MI_INPUT_ABS(ABS),MI_OUTPUT1(INBOUND),MI_OUTPUT1_ABS(ABS),MI_OUTPUT2(INBOUND),MI_OUTPUT2_ABS(ABS).
    Message Mappings: Source is MT_INPUT and target is MT_OUTPUT1,MT_OUTPUT2(MM_Message_Split)
    Interface Mappings: Souce is MT_INPUT_ABS(ABS) and traget is MI_OUTPUT1_ABS,MI_OUTPUT2_ABS(IM_Multiple Files).
    BPM steps are:One recieve step,transformation step,Fork.
    Fork Branch-1:Reciever determination and Send Output1
    Fork Branch-2:Reciever determination and Send Output2.
    I didn't create any correlation ID in BPM.
    In the configuration of XI I know that I have to create 3 reciever determinations,3 Interface Determinations, 2 Reciever agreements and 1 sender agreement.
    But I am fumbling to find out the flow of message interfaces involved here, especially in the interface determinations.
    Please help me, I am a newbie to BPM.........

    Hi Vijaya,
    go through this you can get some idea
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    /people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
    without using bpm:-
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    /people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/06/29/message-splitting-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
    sekhar

Maybe you are looking for