Message Splitting with BPM

Someone knows about an example on splitting a message into several messages (multiline element), the target message type is of one type.

Hi,
Someone knows about an example on splitting a message into several messages (multiline element), the target message type is of one type.
>>>Several messages means several message types ..
But if you want to get multiple lines then it is called multiple occurences. i.e One message type is having multiple main segments.
For e.g in this case, one message type with multiple Segment can occur. If this is your requirement, then no need of multiline etc. Just you need to map it correctly.
<Target>
 <Segment> (1..n)
</Target>
If you want multiple messages i.e one then it will be like this
<Messages>
 <Message1> 1..n
 <Target>
 </Message1>
<Message1> 1..n
 <Target>
</Message1>
</Messages>
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy

Similar Messages

Multi mapping and message splitting in BPM

Hi ,
I am working with this scenario ...
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
how many message interfaces i have to create .
one outbound , one abstract and two inbound .. is it correct.

Hi
Minimum you need to create three message interfaces i.e. Bpm_In_MI_Abstract, aBpm_Out_MI_Abstract Bpm_Out1_MI_Abstract, because abstract interfaces can be use inbound and outbound as well.
You can also use create implement it by using inbound and outbound message interfaces. In that case you have to use three additional interfaces(1 outbound and 2 inbound).
Regards
Sami
Reward points if helpful.

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM

Hi All,
Could anyone pls let me know clearly how message mapping can be done for this weblog
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanks,
Ram

Hi,
When you are doing Message mapping after adding the Messaget types for source and target messages. You can click on the "" button in the target message and add one more tab. You can go to Message tab as shown in the 5th image and click "" button to add one more message type. Then do the mapping as usual.
Based on the value of the element(name), the node of input(details)should be directed to one of the two message types
Here in this blog it is done based on the Name.
You need to use IFTHENELSE boolean function and do the mapping.
Thanks,
Prakash

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM UDFs Error

hi
As per the below blog
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
I have just modified the UDFs(1.selectnodeifA 2.selectNodeifB)
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
2.selectNodeifB
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("B"))
result.addValue(Node);
while checking I am getting the following errors
Source code has syntax error:
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:132: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:140: cannot resolve symbol symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
2 errors
The source code given in the blog is correct ? I thought for loop has not completed
pls help
manian

Hi manian,
I was having a look to Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure blog.
The functions are not the same. I mean, yours and blogs functions.
Each function has two parameters, Name and node. Furtheremore, in the blogs' functions is using arrays and you don't.
So, the right code will be
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=node.length();i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
However, if you don't need an advance user defined function as you want to process just one element of the node's queue, you will not need to use for sentence.
Something like:
1.selectnodeifA
// for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
Hope it is usefull for you.
Carlos

Message Split using BPM for Multiple SOAP Receivers

hi,
I have a scenario where in i have to split the message coming from IDOC(SOURCE) to multiple SOAP(TARGET) receivers through BPM
I took a single file as a scenario and tested it. It worked fine.
I am using only a single output interface.
I have followed this weblog
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
but this blog has 2 output interfaces whereas in my case i just only one output interface that i want to route to multiple receivers based on the value in the PARVW in the IDOC.
Thanks,
Tirumal

hi ,
this is done using CONDITIONAL RECEIVER DETERMIANTION.
While doing your reciver determiantion, you can specify multiple receivers and also specify the condition on which the receiver is to be choosen.
Also, just check the last path of this blog for the same,
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
Regards,
Bhavesh

Message split using BPM.

Hi SDNers,
     My Scenario - Multiple IDocs to 3 output messages. Mesg1 1:1, Msg2 0:1, Msg3 0:1
     We are using BPM to acheive this.
           I am doing message split using BPM. But I have a problem when I am using BPM.
     My requirement is to collect the Idocs for 1 minute, this I acheived by using deadline branch and collecting idocs using container. After that I used Transformation step to run interface mapping by which message is splitting into three messages. Upto this I acheived successfully, then after I got strucked to split the message.
     I am using fork step and and giving three branches, in each branch I am giving receive step and collecting the transformed message. My problem is the message in the first branch is mandatory to come, where as the messages in the remaining two branches are not mandatory. That is my message can split into three messages or just one.
     If I use fork step, without getting the message in all the three branches, the messages in the branches will not come out. Which is not satisfying my requirement.
     I am thinking that before receive step in fork, can I use wait step for 1 minute or can anybody explain what is the functionality of necessary branches.
     Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Jayaram.G

Jayaram.G,
To send the messages in your fork, you need a send step instead of a receive step.
I think you also need to insert a switch in al of the fork's branches, so that the messages will ony be sent when the transformation produced the message. (use the expression [message] EX in the switch).
Kind regards,
Koen

Message Splitting Using BPM

Hi Folks,
    I'm new to SAP PI 7.0 . I want to send one xml file to 2 sender in a splitted manner using BPM. suppose I have 8 fileld in my sender data type, i want to send the xml which contails first 4 fileds to the first receiver and
the xml which contails second 4 fileds to the second receiver.
     Can anybody help me in this case.I have already looked for the already answered threads but i didnt get any help from them.
Thanks & Regards,
   Santosh Kumar Nayak.

Hi,
Check this blog: /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
From the blog:
Three Receiver Determinations are required. One for the Sender to BPM and two
others for BPM to the corresponding output files. In the Interface Determination for the
two Receivers, specify the corresponding Interfaces.
Same logic applicable to your case.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Idoc(receiver) message splitting using BPM

Hi,
could you provide some blogs which is useful for Idoc (as a Receiver) message splitting (1:N scenario) using BPM.
I have gone thru some of the Blogs, i didn't find good one according to this scenario.
Thanks
Praba

Hi Michal,
Thanks for ur reply.
You said " if you have one message and want to have multiple IDOCs
there is no need for a BPM -
you just need to change IDOC occurance - that's all"
I agree to your point.
My scenario is more or less same but "With single message , i need to generate multiple Idocs" based on synchronous proxy response from R3. That is the reason we already gone with BPM.
Already i used the BPM in my interface due to req. It was working. Earlier i was posting single Idoc to R3 with multiple Header segment (each Header segment has one quantity)
Now due to req. change, for each single quantity (quantity is my source Message Type field), i need to post single Idoc to R3 if i get response from R3.
My XI version PI 7.0 SP14
Idoc structure:
 <xsd:attribute name="SEGMENT" type="xsd:string" fixed="1" use="required"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
 </xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:complexType name="WPUWBW.WPUWBW01";>
- <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:documentation>POS interface: Upload goods movements</xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="EDI_DC40" type="EDI_DC40.WPUWBW.WPUWBW01"; />
 <xsd:element name="E1WPG01" type="WPUWBW01.E1WPG01"; minOccurs="0"
 maxOccurs="9999999999" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:attribute name="BEGIN" type="xsd:string" fixed="1" use="required"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" />
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:schema>
Already I am using this Idoc structure in various interfaces also. If i edit the occurance of the this Idoc and import in External definition with same name, I feel it afffect mapping in other interfaces also.
Inputs are highly appreciated.
Edited by: Prabaharan Rangasamy on May 22, 2009 4:14 PM

Message Split without BPM - Error

Hi,
I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
Error Category : MAPPING
Error Code : GENERIC
I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sri.

Hi Venkat,
I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
============================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
Thanks,
Sri.

IDOC Message Splitting with Logic

Hi, I have a business requirement for IDOC to IDOC mapping where the incoming IDOC line item should be split in to multiple line items based on a field value and also the resulting IDOC will be split in to multiple IDOCs based on a limitation on the number of line items. Without using BPM, have anybody used SAP XI to efficiently perform the above logics with proper check logics and error controls ? Appreciate your responses.

Hi Raj,
Try this:
You can use Split by Value node function and set the properties of the split by value as: Each Value.So the for every different number,different item will be created.
Using the Node Functions you can solve your problem.
1.SplitByValue:
The SplitByValue() function is the counterpart to removeContexts(): Instead of deleting a context, you can insert a context change in the source value queue. You then receive this element for each inserted context change instead of a top node element. However, for this to be possible, the top node source field must be assigned a top node target field and minOccurs must be >0. You can insert a context change in the queue after each value, after each change to the value, or after each tag without a value.
2.RemoveContexts:
You use removeContexts () to delete all the top contexts for an element. This removes all top hierarchy levels, so that all elements of the target queue are assigned to a root element of the source queue.
Advanced user-defined functions can import either just one context into the input arrays, or complete queues. Make your selection by selecting or deselecting the Save Entire Queue in Cache checkbox in the function editor.
3.CreateIf:
CreateIf node function is used to create a node if true value is passed to it otherwise suppress it.
4.collapseContext
To remove the context in between the value and transfer only one value at a time
5.useOneAsMany
First Input:
The value which is needed to be repeated.
Second Input:
It defines how many times the first input should be repeated.
Third Input:
It define when the context should be changed (on the basis of the required output
Please go through the given link hope it will be helpful to you.
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Message Mapping Simplified Part II
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Replication of Nodes Using the Graphical Mapping Tool
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/04/17/replication-of-nodes-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Message Splitting Using the Graphical Mapping Tool
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/06/29/message-splitting-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Also check this weblogs:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/16/message-mapping-simplified--part-i
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Split by value
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/3bb8c495125e4eb5969f0377885fe0/content.htm
For value mapping check this video presentation and weblog:
/people/sreekanth.babu2/blog/2005/02/23/value-mapping-replication
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/08/valuemapping-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/docs?rid=/webcontent/uuid/110ff05d-0501-0010-a19d-958247c9f798#xi [original link is broken]
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/04/17/replication-of-nodes-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Function formatByExample:
/people/sundararamaprasad.subbaraman/blog/2006/02/21/real-example-for-formatbyexample
Split by value, remove context and collapse context:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Reward points if this helps
Regards
Pragathi.

Message split via BPM Status stays TBDL

Hi to all,
I have a Scenario with a BPM.
In the IntegrationProcess (IP_Split), is a mapping with message splitting.
The result von the Mapping are serveral Proxymessages and a var count, that counts the new Messages.
After, i have a loop over the messages an with the receiverdetermination i send the new messages to the SAP-System.
the Scenario works fine. in SXI_MONITOR it looks great.
There is only one Problem:
When i go to the Integration Engine in the Message Monitoring (Runtime Workbench) there is a strange Message.
There is a Message with SenderService and ReceiverService IP_Split. The Status is still TBDL.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks
Chris

Hi,
Few months ago we had also problems with "locked user" in XI, in our case XIAPPLUSER was sometimes (b)locked.
Perhaps note:
721548 Changing the passwords of the XI 3.0 service users
will help you.
We removed and entered the service users again, with the password in CAPITALS and language blank.
After that our problem was solved, I hope yours too.
Regards
Jack

Message split without BPM?

Can we do correlation (message merge) without bpm. I mean Is there any adwanced service pack which support this,so that we can avoid bpm?

Hi,
Ur subject and ur question is confusing.....
Message split means splitting the one message into N message that is 1:N
And message merge is merging the N message to 1 message N:1.
Wat u want to do...can you pls explain with example.
Correlation is a functionality provided in BPM.
Thnx
Chirag

Message splitting without bpm

Could anyone please give any idea or links about end to end configuration for message splitting without using bpm.
Thanks
sabyasachi
Edited by: Sabyasachi Mohapatra on Apr 7, 2009 11:50 AM

Hi Sameerr
.i have one sender & 2 receivers.Please guide how to configure end to end in the receiver determination step & interface determination step.How many sender & receiver agreements need to be configured.
Thanks & Regards
Sabyasachi

Message Splitting with out BPM

Hi,
Is there anyway to split the message into different messages suppouse M1,M2,M3. And I want to route these messages i.e. M1, M2, M3 dynamically to receivers using enhanced receiver determination.
i.e. M1 is to route R1,R2,R3. M2 needs to route R3,R4 & M3 needs to route R1, R3. Appreciate for your response.
Thanks,
Rao.Mallikarjuna

Hi Rao,
Please check these blogs for more details
Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios
Thanks!

Multi-Message-split with ABAP mapping and adapter specific attributes

Hi all,
With ABAP-Mapping I split 1 message to n messages.
So many files are generated in file-Adapter.
Everything fine.
But now I want the file names different using adapter specific attributes.
It is not possible to use variable substitution and write the file name in payload because of receiver restrictions.
I tried this with following similar coding in ABAP-Mapping:
data: lt_records TYPE MPP_DYNAMIC_TAB.
 Loop.
 l_file_name = "payload-Inbound"-information
 ls_record-namespace = 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File'.
 ls_record-name = 'FileName'.
 ls_record-value = l_file_name. "l_file_name comes from inbound-payload
 append ls_record to lt_records.
 Endloop.
CALL METHOD dynamic_configuration->set_all_records
 EXPORTING
 records = lt_records.
If I start the interface I see in the monitoring the dynamic configuration with many entries for file-name in the the SOAP-Header mapping of the request message (following extract):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:DynamicConfiguration xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Record namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File" name="FileName">BPAADDRESS.XML</SAP:Record>
<SAP:Record namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File" name="FileName">BPABROKERROLE.XML</SAP:Record>
<SAP:Record namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File" name="FileName">BPACOMPANYSEGMENT.XML</SAP:Record>
<SAP:Record namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File" name="FileName">BPACUSTOMERROLE.XML</SAP:Record>
The result is that all files have the same file name (last entry in dynamic configuration).
Is it possible to write the adapter specific configuration in ABAP-mapping for every single result message??
Thank you for your help,
Florian

Hi Florian,
I've a different idea...I dont think its a "right solution" but just another work around..it involves a BPM...
In your ABAP mapping..set the dynamic config with as many variables as number of different messages...i.e. use the variables like 'FileName1', 'FileName2'...'FileName6' instead of 'FileName'. But use the same namespace 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File'
Call the above mapping in a BPM and capture the individual messages and set the attribute 'FileName' from the values of 'FileName1' to 'FileName6' accordingly using Message Mapping and then send the message using the 'Send' step.
before you try this, try using the variable names 'FileName1' ...'FileName6' in the receiver adapters...enable the ASMS. I know we need to select which variables from the dynamic config to be used by the adapter by specifically selecting 'FileName', 'Directory' etc...but just give it a try and see if it works..
Or..instead of using a BPM..you can combine Henrique's idea...use Adapter module to set the value for 'FileName' from variables 'FileName1'...'FileName6' accordingly.
hope I'm clear..lemme know if you have any questions..
cheers
praveen

Message Splitting with BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for