Messages in Xi is less than the messages in R/3 server after processing.
Hi Experts
I have a scenario file - Idoc.
XI picks up the file from FTP process it and sends to the R/3 server.
Now I have a problem is when I check the Data in XI using IDX5 or SXMB_MONI the no of messages in xi is less than the messages in R/3 server.
I am checking the data of the last day like 8th May from 00:00:00 to 23:59:59 in both the cases.
In R/3 I check using BD87 t code.
Thanx
Hi Divyesh
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Ya I am also doing exactly the same . But the problem is that I am checking for yesterday datas.
In idx5 I get total of 2625 messages for orders.
When I check the same on BD87 i get 2636 messages with status 53 & 1 message with status 51.
Difference is of 11.
Now the question in how is it possible that it is picking 2625 data from FTP and after processing its sending 2637 data on R/3 server.
Thanx
Similar Messages
-
Message no. RM109 The quantity at RP is less than the quantity at next RP
Hello everyone,
I am getting an error in regards to a reporting point. I tried going into MF4R to reset the reporting points and when I do I get the following message:
The quantity at RP 0220 is less than the quantity at the next RP
Message no. RM109
Diagnosis
The reporting point structure is inconsistent as at reporting point 0220, the backflush quantity is less than at the subsequent reporting point. In a consistent backflush, the quantity at a subsequent reporting point (work in process) always less than or equal to the quantity at the previous reporting point.
Procedure
Check the reporting point stocks using transaction MF26. Post any missing quantities at previous reporting points.
I have went into MF26 and "Yes" reporting point 0220 is less than the following reporting point. My question is... how do I fix this? Any help will be greatly appreciated.Good morning Raj,
Here is what MF26 is showing:
614830 0033 0001 W3300
0010 84 PC
0020 38 PC
0030 38 PC
0040 38 PC
0050 38 PC
0060 84 PC
0070 84 PC
0080 84 PC
0090 84 PC
0100 38 PC
0110 84 PC
0130 38 PC
0140 38 PC
0150 38 PC
0155 84 PC
0160 38 PC
0165 84 PC
0170 84 PC
0180 38 PC
0185 84 PC
0190 84 PC
0200 38 PC
0210 38 PC
0220 38 PC
0225 84 PC
0230 84 PC
0240 84 PC
0245 84 PC
0246 84 PC
0250 84 PC
0260 84 PC
0270 84 PC
0280 84 PC
0290 84 PC
As you can see RP 0220 shows only 38 pcs RP 0225 and up shows 84 pcs. Using MFBF I backflushed 46 pcs to RP 0220 to make it equal to the 84 pcs. But, when I went back into MF26 RP 0220 still shows 38 pcs.
Thank you for your help!
Rhonda -
GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.
Dear Gurus,
if anybody puts GR date lesser than the PO date, system should display error this happens because the system allows back dated posting of 101 MVT in MIGO.Similarly the IR date should not be less than the GR date. This happens because the system allows back dated posting of MIRO also.
Regards
ASHOK KHi,
Use the badi MB_DOCUMENT_BADI and compare dates of EKKO-BEDAT and MKPF-BLDAT for MIGO.
USe the badi IF_EX_MRM_INVOICE_UPDATE PROCESS_AT_ and compare the dates of MKPF-BLDAT and RBKP-BLDAT while saving the invoice for checking the back dated entries and throw an error message.
Regards,
Bharat -
Hello , I think the below event alert 4113 is very common and is due to that only one database copy is present in DAG but is there any way we can stop this alert for the
specific database.
The message tells that there is only one copy of the database - create another copy and the warning message will go away but
we do not want to create another copy. So is there any way we can stop this event getting generated.
Database redundancy health check failed.
Database copy: DB-1
Redundancy count: 1
Error: The number of configured copies for database 'DB-1' (1) is less than the required redundancy count (2).
Name Status RealCopyQueu InspectorQue ReplayQueue CIState
e
ue
DB-1\ Mounted 0 0 0
Healthy
MAILSRV2
===============
Full Status
===============
Identity : DB-1\MAILSRV2
Name : DB-1\MAILSRV2
DatabaseName : DB-1
Status : Mounted
MailboxServer : MAILSRV2
ActiveDatabaseCopy : MAILSRV2
ActivationSuspended : False
ActionInitiator : Unknown
ErrorMessage :
ErrorEventId :
ExtendedErrorInfo :
SuspendComment :
SinglePageRestore : 0
ContentIndexState : Healthy
ContentIndexErrorMessage :
CopyQueueLength : 0
ReplayQueueLength : 0
LatestAvailableLogTime :
LastCopyNotificationedLogTime :
LastCopiedLogTime :
LastInspectedLogTime :
LastReplayedLogTime :
LastLogGenerated : 0
LastLogCopyNotified : 0
LastLogCopied : 0
LastLogInspected : 0
LastLogReplayed : 0
LogsReplayedSinceInstanceStart : 0
LogsCopiedSinceInstanceStart : 0
LatestFullBackupTime :
LatestIncrementalBackupTime :
LatestDifferentialBackupTime :
LatestCopyBackupTime :
SnapshotBackup :
SnapshotLatestFullBackup :
SnapshotLatestIncrementalBackup :
SnapshotLatestDifferentialBackup :
SnapshotLatestCopyBackup :
LogReplayQueueIncreasing : False
LogCopyQueueIncreasing : False
OutstandingDumpsterRequests : {}
OutgoingConnections :
IncomingLogCopyingNetwork :
SeedingNetwork :
ActiveCopy : True
ThanksThat regex looks odd to me. I assume you have databases with names like "Mailbox Database <ten digit number>" (standard Exchange default name, in other words), "ABC-DB" and "HOME-DB". If this is the case, wouldn't
you want "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"? THis works if I run it from a prompt:
[PS] C:\Scripts>"Mailbox Database 0123456789" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
True
[PS] C:\Scripts>"Mailbox Database 123456789" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
False
[PS] C:\Scripts>"Mailbox Database 12345678910" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
False
[PS] C:\Scripts>"HOME-DB" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
True
[PS] C:\Scripts>"ABC-DB" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
True
[PS] C:\Scripts>"ABCD-DB" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
False
[PS] C:\Scripts>"HOM-DB" -match "(?:Mailbox Database \d{10}$|^ABC-DB$|^HOME-DB$)"
False
I find it's easiest to test RegEx's from the prompt this way. If the above isn't your goal, let us know, and we'll see if we can come up with something better. -
Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received
Hi,
I have done MIGO with part 1 entry but while doing J1IEX, I am getting an error message 4F109 : Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received.
Please note that we have done MIGO with 5000 qty. and doing J1IEX with short 3000 qty.
Regards.Hi,
For this case of "Part I" selected during GR, you need to create Excise invoice thro J1IEX -> Capture Excise Invoice -> Good receipt (use the material document number), which will complete the part II posting. Then you can proceed with MIRO.
With regards,
Jeeva. -
How order got transmitted even if quantity is less than the minimum
Hi All,
We have an issue where an order has been transmitted for 23 cases where minimum is 25. This order came through even if this order is for that part of the region that should not be able to tranmit orders if under min..
Being a technical guy, I am not able to understand the issue itself.
Doubts :
1. How an order is supposed to be transmitted ?
2. What is this minimum below which an order should not be transmitted? Where this minimum value is defined ? Is it specific to customer or specific to area or specific to plant?
In which table or through T-Code I can check this minimum ....
Can you please guide how to explore the above....
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SanjeetHi Sanjeet
You can maintain "Minimum order quantity" in the Material master data.
Go to change mode of material master (MM02), enter your material number, click enter, select the "Sale org 1" tab and continue.
Now, in the "Sales org 1" tab , scrolled down and you will find a field "Minimum order quantity" as you required, save it.
Suppose, you have entered ,minimum order quantity as 10 pcs.
If you create an order for that item and if the quantity is below 10 pieces then system will give you "warning message". This is normal standard setting.
If you want that system should give "Error message" instead of "Warning message" , then go to transaction code "OVAH".
For combination "V4" and "082", change the sytem message to "E" (normally you will find here W).
NOW, SYSTEM WILL GIVE YOU ERROR MESSAGE IF YOU ENTER , in the Sale order, order quantity which is less than the minimum order quantity as specified in the material master data. -
The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount
Hi all,
Our customers are using SAP 2007-PL15 and SAP 2007-PL41.
When we want to create a down payment for a sales order, and we want to pay the entire amount of the sales order, including tax, we have to put an amount inthe TOTAL field of the Down Payment window since by default, the down payment amount is the total of the invoice before applying tax. The DPM is
higher than 100% (strange but I think it's normal since the down payment is not planned to take the tax in consideration).
Then, we create an incoming payment for this down payment. It's ok.
Then, we create an invoice based on the sales order we have paid with the down payment. It's impossible to use the down payment for the invoice... why that ? We receive the error 'The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount'. This causes big headaches to our customers !!
Could you explain us what to do please ?
thanks,
LuceI'm very sorry, I have a similar question in dealing with AP Down Payment Request Linked to AP Invoice, my case like this:
1. I created 3 AP DPRs,their amount are each 100,000 RMB(for example, their document number are 10,11,12). then do the outgoing payment fully paided.
2. I created a AP Invoice with the amount 150,000 RMB(for example, this AR Invoice document number is 5). I use the buttom"Total Down Payment",and selecet AP DRP No.10 and 11. When I click the buttom"Add",an error shows:
The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount
and I don't know how to continue.....
Many Thanks
Kam
(PS:My English is poor,forgive me please. Shall I Speak in Chinese? then I can describe this question more clearly.) -
I am debating between the 13in 2.9ghz mac book pro or the 13in 2.5 ghz mac book pro with all the same specs bbut for me i am trying to see which one for the money is better becuase the 2.5 will run me 100-200 dollars less than the other
Only you can make that determination. All things being equal the 2.5 GHz model is slower.
-
PO is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO am
Purchase Order is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO amount. The release strategy is only working for the first Purchase Order and if the PO amount is greater than the last PO amount.
Please let me know how to correct this scenario (release strategy).
Regards,
PrishuHi,
Release strategy has nothing do with the previous PO amount. May be, Co-incidently the amount in previous PO which you are referring and the characteristics value maintained in the release strategy is same.
1) Please go in release strategy by the path mentioned below
IMG u2013 Material Management u2013 Purchasing u2013 Purchase Requisition u2013 Release Procedure u2013 Procedure with Classification u2013 Set Up Procedure with Classification
2) Then go to release strategy. Here the total available release strategies would be displayed. Double click the strategy which is getting reflected in the PO you want and go the classifiction tab. There you will get the PO value. Based on this characteristic value the respective release streategy gets refelected.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards
sachin -
The original 5 meters distance router in WiFi signal is full, but the beginning of the past few days more than 3 meters on the search to the WiFi signal, my own iPhone 5, iPhone 4S received signal is full, only iPad2 searching for less than the signal.
The original 5 meters distance router in WiFi signal is full, but the beginning of the past few days more than 3 meters on the search to the WiFi signal, my own iPhone 5, iPhone 4S received signal is full, only iPad2 searching for less than the signal.
-
JPS-00080: Credential store schema version 12.1.2.0.0 is less than the latest schema version 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the Credential store schema to latest version.
Hi All,
When trying to extend my domain, it fails with above error.
any suggestions on fix?
is this related to Fusion Infrastructure ADF RCU utility?
thanksHi JCGO,
The Schema installed on your DB is 12.1.2.0.0 but the Domain Extension requires 12.1.3.0.0.
One solution is to run the 12.1.3.0.0 RCU, drop the existing schema on your DB, followed by installation 12.1.3.0.0 schema on the DB, so that the Domain extension gets the 12.1.3.0.0 schema
One more solution is to open the template on which you are extending the domain. The templates are present in ${MW_HOME}/oracle_common/common/templates/wls , explore to the required configuration inside yourtemplate.jar and comment out the Credential store schema version pre-requisite. This is not a good approach, but still it'll be a good workaround since 12.1.2.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0 schema wont have much difference.
Thanks,
Shiva Shankar B N -
Required delivery date in sales order shoud not be less than the inhouse pd
Customer Requested Dates (CRD) entered in orders are often shorter than Product form wise lead time.
Logic to be configured in SAP : SAP should capture the CRD as per the lead time of Products or Date entered by sales persons (whichever is later).
Required delivery date in sales order shoud not be less than the inhouse production lead time.
Please help.
RegardsIMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Availability Check - Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning - Carry Out Control For Availability Check
Here select the combination of your Availability Check & Checking Rule.
Under Replenishment Lead TIme, you need to put a Tick Mark in the Check Box of "Check without RLT"
This will make sure that system considers either the Requested Delivery Date or actual Material Availability Date, which ever is earlier.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Edited by: Jignesh Mehta on Nov 9, 2011 12:18 PM
Edited by: Jignesh Mehta on Nov 9, 2011 12:23 PM -
Header qty is less than the operation qty.
To certain production order header qty is less than the operation qty. Please advise me.
Dear,
Base Quantity - Quantity of the material to be produced to which the standard values of the operation refer.
Operation Quantity - Quantity planned for this operation.
Base quantity and operation quantity may not always be the same, if we have partial lots delivered during the sequence of operations, the operation quantity will be equal to the lot delivered during the operation.
Base quantity is dependent on the BOM, where it signifies the total quantity of output after using the components of certain quantity.
In routing, you neeed maintained there operation quantity, and unit of measure of operation quantity accordingly with base quantity unit of measure.
Check up the Processing formula used in the Scheduling tab of Work center (Use SAP002 = Machine * Oprn qty / Base qty / No. of splits)
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Oct 7, 2008 11:37 AM -
Create TO for a quantity less than the delivery quantity
If we have created an inbound delivery in MB1C, 561 movement to post an initial entry of stocks, and then packed the HU in Vl32N. Now, we want to create a TO for a quantity less than the delivery quantity.
In LT03 I cant see any option to change the TO quantity. How can we actually change the TO quantity to be less than the Delivery quantity.
Thanks
-MikeMike,
I dont think that's going to be possible. The TO gets data from the del qty which is in your embedded HU since you have packed the qty in the del in the HU,
so if you are trying to create a TO with less qty means that you want a qty less that the HU in the del and this is not possible.
Alternatively :
1) You can receive it in your warehouse.
2) Move it in a re-packaging area
3) break the HU and re-create a new HU.
4) Pack the desired qty
5) Move the 2 HU's back to their desired bins.
Hope this helps and works!
thanks' -
Disable Booking if Reservable Quantity is less than the Ordered Quantity
Hi Everyone,
How can we disable booking of sales order if the quantity reservable for an item is less than the quantity ordered in the sales order?
Best regards,
PaulYou need to Modify WorkFlow . You can do something like this.
1) Add a custom node between Book-Eligible and Book Node
2) Write your logic Inside the proc, which will get called from newly created custom node.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Multiple Blog Summary Widgets on one page
Hello I was wondering if anyone knew how to put multiple Blog Summary Widgets onto a single page? Basically having a single weblog page but hosting more than one blog on that page. If you do a simple copy and paste, it will pick up the "feed" from th
-
Why can't i place order to qvc from ipad ?
when i try to place an order to qvc i get the message "unable to complete transaction online" I have called qvc and they reset my password but still can't order
-
Query to find Orders that have all LINES CLOSED status
All, CAn someone send me SQL QUERY TO find all ORDERS that have all LINES in CLOSED status. we have an issue in an environment, i am trying to build a data fix script. regards girish
-
I deleted Terminal application by mistake, how do I reinstall without Lion Disc? I downloaded via AppStore.
-
Printing color on Canon iRC4080i
I just joined a company where I need to print fliers in color from my mac. I have OSX 10.5.8. The printer is a Canon iRC4080i, and I was given the mac printer driver that goes with it. I print through the network - my computer sees the printer, and I