Messages Stuck in Submission Queue after Database failover to DR site

Hi Everyone,
Yesterday Night we had a Database failover to DR site but emails were stuck in the submission queue to resolve we failed back the Database. We have Exchange 2010 SP3 Ru4 with Active-Active DAG across 2 AD sites.
After checking the connectivity logs on the Transport server i found out that the Transport server was trying to connect to the mailbox server where this database was residing directly instead of using the Transport servers in the 2nd site.
We have 4 more databases on the same server but for those databases there was no issues and the mail flow was working fine.
Only thing i checked is that we have about 700 GB of log files for this database. Could that can cause this issue.

Hi,
Thanks for your response.
I did not restart transport service. I assume restarting transport service might have resolved the issue.
But, i want to know the reason why this happened as we have stretch DAG so this can cause major outage in case more mailbox database fails over.
Removing the logs files is what i am thinking to do maybe within this week.

Similar Messages

TNEF Issue - Winmail.dat or messages stuck in submission queue

Hi guys,
I've looked around the forums and have found people that have had submission queue issues when they set TNEF to $null or $false, and have found that the unified answer is to set TNEF to $true.
I also see folks having issues with recipients in remote domains receiving winmail.dat files in some instances (with a .pdf or .xls file attached) if TNEF is set to $true.
I have both issues. If I set TNEF to $true, I encounter the winmail.dat file problem. If I set TNEF to $false or $null, I encounter the submission queue issue (submission queue states "A transient storage failure occured", and users get a queue
expiration bounce). Neither of these states are acceptable. I cannot have messages stuck in the queue only to be expired, and I cannot have recipients in remote domains failing to receive attachments in emails.
Does anyone have a possible workaround that might resolve this particular situation? It seems that this has been an issue in Exch 2010.
Current Environment Configuration:
I am running Exchange 2013 SP1 Standard on both of my CAS/MBX servers, running on Server 2012 R2 patched to the latest updates. I have an inbound spam filter, but mail outbound is not filtered, therefore the spam filter on our side should not play a role.
I do have not made any changes to the exchange default malware filter either. Other than this issue, mail is flowing correctly and as expected.

I also see folks having issues with recipients in remote domains receiving winmail.dat files in some instances (with a .pdf or .xls file attached) if TNEF is set to $true.
Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that all the remote domain's recipients would receive winmail.dat files when you send the message to them if TNEF is set to $true, right?
The Winmail.dat file is used to preserve Rich Text formatting. Outlook uses it when sending a Rich Text-formatted message. During transport, the content of the message may be changed, preventing the receiving client from being able to read the formatting
instructions. In other cases, the receiving client does not use or recognize the winmail.dat file.
I recommend that you refer to the following article to solve the issue:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/278061
Method 1: Change the default message format
The sender can change the format of the email messages that they send by using the following steps:
On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click
Mail Format.
In Compose in this message format, click to select Plain Text, and then click
OK.
NOTE: To send to certain recipients that use RTF format and others recipients that use plain text format, the sender must set the option for the recipient in either the Personal Address Book or the recipient's contact record.
Method 2: Modify the recipient's entry in the Personal Address Book
The sender can use the following steps to remove the RTF format from the recipient attribute in the Personal Address Book:
On the Tools menu, click Address Book.
In Show Names From, click the Personal Address Book.
Select the addressee that you want to set as plain text, and then click
Properties on the File menu.
In the SMTP-General tab, click to clear the Always send to this recipient in Microsoft Exchange rich text format check box, and then click
OK.
Method 3: Change the specific contact format
The sender can use the following steps to set plain text in the recipient's contact record:
Open the recipient's record in the Contacts folder.
Double-click the recipient's e-mail address.
In the E-Mail Properties dialog box, click Send Plain Text only under
Internet Format.
Method 4: Set the Outlook Rich Text Format Internet e-mail setting
In Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2007, click Options on the Tools menu.
Click the Mail Format tab.
Click Internet Format.
Under Outlook Rich Text options, click either Convert to HTML format or
Convert to Plain Text format.
Hope this helps!
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support
Niko,
The Winmail.dat issue is only part of the problem, as described in my original post. For these messages (which it's a different set of messages every time, and it's becoming impossible for me to track them all down), if I set exchange or outlook to encode
the message in Rich Text, the message gets encoded and sent to the recipient. Some of our recipients will reject the message because it is rich text, others receive a winmail.dat file.
However, if I set exchange to not encode messages (TNEF= $false or $null), the message becomes stuck in the submission queue and eventually times out with an error resembling "Storage Transient Failure".

Some Journaled Calendar Requests get stuck in Submission queue - 550 5.6.0 - storage error in content conversion

I am having an issue on hub transport servers running Exchange 2010 SP3 RU6.
Where some journaled meeting request related messages (acceptances, etc.) get stuck in the Submission queue.
The error is:
400 4.4.7 The server responded with: 550 5.6.0 M2MCVT.StorageError; storage error in content conversion. The failure was replaced by a retry response because the message was marked for retry if rejected.
I raised the issue with our mail archiving vendor and they indicated this was an Exchange Server problem which should have been fixed in Exchange 2010 SP3 RU3, however we are running SP3 RU6 and the issue continues to occur.
I realize that we could just delete the stuck messages from queue but has anyone run in to this before and know how to prevent it from happening?
Thank You.

Hi Mike,
If you temporary disable\bypass third party Archiving , then what happens in the Queue.
Thanks , Prakash
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Messages stuck in Inbound Queue with Ready Status

Hi All,
The messages in the Inbound queue are getting stuck in Ready status.
I have to manually Unlock each queue to start the processing.
After some time again all the message queue are back to the Ready State.
Please help me on this issue.
Regards
Milan

go to --> sxmb_adm
Manage Queue
Select all Queues, Activate Queues.
& check your scenarios, now it will not stuck due to this error.

Messages stuck in Java Queues

I am running PI7.0 SP10 on a MCOD system running ECC6.0 and EP.
We had an issue last week on our Production system where the Java Stack went down, and when the system came back up, we cleared the issues in SMQ1, SMQ2 and SM58 and now we have over two hundred messages stuck in the java queues.
There is nothing locked in SM13, in sxmb_moni all the messgaes are successfully processed... In the RWB the status of the messages are "To be delivered".
I have tried reactivating the adapters but this has not worked.
The queues can be seen in the http://host.fqdn:5<SYSNO>00/MessagingSystem/monitor/systemStatus.jsp
specifically : File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/SystemRecv
and
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/SystemRecv
where the "isStarted" is set to false, where all the others are true...
How can I go about starting these and processing the backlog of messages??
I have searched OSS, SDN and SAPFans but had not luck!
I have subsequently done a full cache refresh and CPACache refresh but this has not helped.
There are no locked users (XI/PI users) holding this up!

Ok,
It seems to be ok, the return can be http 200 or http 500.
The Soap and File are destinations, ok.
The messages are with status "delivering" on rwb... really, increasing the number of threads will not solve this...
I don't have access to visual admin (only basis team can access it here). I thought it could be something wrong with destination (but you already checked it)... so, the only thing can be done is to find in visual admin somewhere about system properties, conection parameters searching for something wrong there... here are our parameters if you would like to find something (sorry for the size of message)...
AFW.Call.maxConsumers 10
AFW.Recv.maxConsumers 5
AFW.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
AFW.Send.maxConsumers 5
BC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
BC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
BC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
BC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
BcAdapter.Call.maxConsumers 10
BcAdapter.Recv.maxConsumers 5
BcAdapter.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
BcAdapter.Send.maxConsumers 5
CIDXAdapter.Call.maxConsumers 10
CIDXAdapter.Recv.maxConsumers 5
CIDXAdapter.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
CIDXAdapter.Send.maxConsumers 5
CIDX_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
CIDX_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
CIDX_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
CIDX_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
EOIO.lockTimeout 5
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
JPR.Call.maxConsumers 10
JPR.Recv.maxConsumers 5
JPR.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
JPR.Send.maxConsumers 5
MPA.Call.maxConsumers 10
MPA.Recv.maxConsumers 5
MPA.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
MPA.Send.maxConsumers 5
Mail_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
Mail_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
Mail_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
Mail_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
Marketplace_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
Marketplace_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
Marketplace_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
Marketplace_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
RFC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
RNIF11Adapter.Call.maxConsumers 20
RNIF11Adapter.Recv.maxConsumers 10
RNIF11Adapter.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
RNIF11Adapter.Send.maxConsumers 10
RNIF11_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
RNIF11_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
RNIF11_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
RNIF11_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
RNIFAdapter.Call.maxConsumers 10
RNIFAdapter.Recv.maxConsumers 5
RNIFAdapter.Rqst.maxConsumers 10
RNIFAdapter.Send.maxConsumers 5
RNIF_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
RNIF_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
RNIF_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
RNIF_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Call.maxConsumers 20
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Recv.maxConsumers 10
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.Send.maxConsumers 10
bulkCommit.threshold 100
cluster.timeout 60000
connection.0.ackListener null
connection.0.exceptionListener localejbs/AFWListener
connection.0.jms.messageSelector null
connection.0.jms.profile null
connection.0.jms.provider null
connection.0.jms.queue null
connection.0.messageListener localejbs/AFWListener
connection.0.name AFW
connection.0.pollAttempts 60
connection.0.pollInterval 60000
connection.1.ackListener localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener
connection.1.exceptionListener localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener
connection.1.jms.messageSelector null
connection.1.jms.profile null
connection.1.jms.provider null
connection.1.jms.queue null
connection.1.messageListener localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener
connection.1.name MPA
connection.1.pollAttempts 60
connection.1.pollInterval 60000
connection.2.ackListener null
connection.2.exceptionListener localejbs/JPR
connection.2.jms.messageSelector null
connection.2.jms.profile null
connection.2.jms.provider null
connection.2.jms.queue null
connection.2.messageListener localejbs/JPR
connection.2.name JPR
connection.2.pollAttempts 60
connection.2.pollInterval 60000
connection.3.ackListener null
connection.3.exceptionListener localejbs/RNIFMessageListener
connection.3.jms.messageSelector null
connection.3.jms.profile null
connection.3.jms.provider null
connection.3.jms.queue null
connection.3.messageListener localejbs/RNIFMessageListener
connection.3.name RNIFAdapter
connection.3.pollAttempts 60
connection.3.pollInterval 60000
connection.4.ackListener null
connection.4.exceptionListener localejbs/CIDXMessageListener
connection.4.jms.messageSelector null
connection.4.jms.profile null
connection.4.jms.provider null
connection.4.jms.queue null
connection.4.messageListener localejbs/CIDXMessageListener
connection.4.name CIDXAdapter
connection.4.pollAttempts 60
connection.4.pollInterval 60000
connection.5.ackListener localejbs/BcAdapterListener
connection.5.exceptionListener localejbs/BcAdapterListener
connection.5.jms.messageSelector null
connection.5.jms.profile null
connection.5.jms.provider null
connection.5.jms.queue null
connection.5.messageListener localejbs/BcAdapterListener
connection.5.name BcAdapter
connection.5.pollAttempts 60
connection.5.pollInterval 60000
connection.6.ackListener null
connection.6.exceptionListener localejbs/TestListener
connection.6.jms.messageSelector null
connection.6.jms.profile null
connection.6.jms.provider null
connection.6.jms.queue null
connection.6.messageListener localejbs/TestListener
connection.6.name test
connection.6.pollAttempts 60
connection.6.pollInterval 60000
connection.7.ackListener null
connection.7.exceptionListener localejbs/RNIF11MessageListener
connection.7.jms.messageSelector null
connection.7.jms.profile null
connection.7.jms.provider null
connection.7.jms.queue null
connection.7.messageListener localejbs/RNIF11MessageListener
connection.7.name RNIF11Adapter
connection.7.pollAttempts 60
connection.7.pollInterval 60000
connections (name=AFW, messageListener=localejbs/AFWListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/AFWListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=MPA, messageListener=localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener, ackListener=localejbs/MarketPlaceAdapterListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=JPR, messageListener=localejbs/JPR, exceptionListener=localejbs/JPR, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=RNIFAdapter, messageListener=localejbs/RNIFMessageListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/RNIFMessageListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=CIDXAdapter, messageListener=localejbs/CIDXMessageListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/CIDXMessageListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=BcAdapter, messageListener=localejbs/BcAdapterListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/BcAdapterListener, ackListener=localejbs/BcAdapterListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=5, Recv.maxConsumers=5, Call.maxConsumers=10, Rqst.maxConsumers=10)(name=test, messageListener=localejbs/TestListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/TestListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=10, Recv.maxConsumers=10, Call.maxConsumers=20, Rqst.maxConsumers=20)(name=RNIF11Adapter, messageListener=localejbs/RNIF11MessageListener, exceptionListener=localejbs/RNIF11MessageListener, pollInterval=60000, pollAttempts=60, Send.maxConsumers=10, Recv.maxConsumers=10, Call.maxConsumers=20, Rqst.maxConsumers=20)
debug HTTP
failover.reassignOnNodeLoss true
initial.delay 0
jdbc.autoConfigure false
jdbc.datasource jdbc/SAP/BC_XI_AF_MSG
jdbc.dbProductName ORACLE
jdbc.substituteEmptyString true
jdbc.supportsOpenSQL true
jdbc.supportsScrollableResultSet false
jms.0.dmq SonicMQ.deadMessage
jms.0.messageLengthKey message_length
jms.0.password ********
jms.0.provider
jms.0.url
jms.0.username
monitoring.displayDefault fromParty, toParty, status, timesFailedRetries, sentRecvTime
persistMessageRemover.checkInterval 1440
proxy.password ********
proxy.user
reassignCheck.waitTime 30
ssl.httpsHandler iaik.protocol.https.Handler
ssl.securityProvider iaik.security.provider.IAIK
ssl.serverNameCheck false
ssl.trustedCACerts.viewName TrustedCAs
startup.delay 0
syncMessageRemover.checkInterval 60
syncMessageRemover.messageCount 1000
syncMessageRemover.removeBody true
system.deafaultMaxConsumersPerQueue 10
system.failNonDelivered false
system.message.lazyRead true
system.node 23654950
system.queueConsumerThreadPoolSize 0
system.statusLog System,Send,Recv,Call,Rqst
system.transactionManager ts
test.Call.maxConsumers 20
test.Recv.maxConsumers 10
test.Rqst.maxConsumers 20
test.Send.maxConsumers 10
throughputStatistics enabled
regards
roberti

Service broker message stuck in Transmission Queue

Hi,
I have a fairly simple Service Broker set up to send messages between 2 DBs within the same instance. Since there is no cross-networking here, I did not set up any routes. So I have a SendQ associated with SendService in DB1 and a ReceiveQ associated with ReceiveService in DB2. Both are on Server S1.
I've set TRUSTWORTH on both DBs.
ALTER DATABASE <DBNAME> SET TRUSTWORTHY ON
Since I'm using Integrated Windows security, I also granted send permission to public
GRANT SEND ON SERVICE::ReceiveService TO [public];
However when I send out a message, it doesn't go to either the SendQ or ReceiveQ. Instead it sits in the sys.transmission_queue with the following message
An exception occurred while enqueueing a message in the target queue. Error: 916, State: 3. The server principal "S-1-9-3-4070899528-1141234901-971043712-2725434662." is not able to access the database "DB2" under the current security context.
Can anyone please help me with what I might be doing wrong or missing here? Thanks,

Please have a look at the following thread, it may help you solve your problem: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sqlsecurity/thread/07dcab8c-b830-4ca9-8afc-3e75772f44d3/

Message stuck in inbound queue of r/3 for inbound proxy

Hi Experts,
The scenerio is Inbound Proxy.
I m using standard prgram rfbibl00 to post a document (FB01) in Inbound proxy. When the message is triggered from XI, it get stuck in inbound queue of R/3 ( SMQ2) giving the status text "Session 1: Special character for 'empty field' .
Please help to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.

dear experts,
did u get chance to look into this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Messages stuck in the queue... how do I make them to be processed again?

Hi,
I'm new to SAP PI and kinda confused with queues.
I have file -> bpm -> file scenario and there was an error in mapping within bpm process.
When I went to qRFC Monitor (smq2), I see that in XBQO$PE_WS90000002 queue,
there's an error, 'Permanent error in BPE inbound processing'... which is expected.
Now, I run the interface scenario again several times but they don't get processed
but stuck in the same queue. At this stage, I didn't know what to do...
I thought by deleting the error message, other messages will be processed...
I deleted the error message but the other messages are still in the queue...
I have two questoins.
1. What is the best way to handle an error in the queue... can I just delete it? or is there a better way to handle an error in the queue?
2. After deleting the queue, what should I do to make the other messages to be processed again...
Thank you.
-Won

Hi Won,
There are programs for restarting the LUW entries:
programs
· RSARFCRD: tRFC Monitor (transaction SM58)
· RSARFCSE: Restart an LUW (background job)
· RSARFCEX: Restart tRFC LUWs (background job)
· RSQOWKEX: Restart QOUT qRFC LUWs
· RSQIWKEX: Restart QIN qRFC LUWs
· RSARFCSE: Delete an LUW (background job)
· RSARFCER: Delete various LUWs
Also, check the url:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/25/bcfa40badbf46fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sushama

Messages stuck in outgoing folder after update

Hi to all,
I migrated data from my old imac (ppc/10.4.11) to a new macbook pro 13", all is ok for files and documents, but all fails about Mail.app
It restored all messages without any problems but when i try to send a message it disappear without any confirmation o some details in Activity Viewer.
If i try to quit Mail.app and relaunch it, it appear in Outgoing folder (not Sent), a click on Send/Receive and it leaves...
I try to check all settings in preference but they are ok, i try also to regain Certificates because my smtp (a macosx server machine) require SSL + login to sent messages...
Do i need to rebuild also Mail Plist preference or there is command/trick to resolve my problem?
thank you

Hello Phil.
If the account is a POP type account, quit Mail first and using the Finder go to Home > Library > Mail > this POP account named folder (named by the user name and incoming mail server for the account) > Drafts.mbox.
Delete the Drafts.mbox folder and empty the Trash. This will delete all messages contained in the account's Drafts mailbox.
Launch Mail and a new Drafts.mbox folder will be created automatically within the account named folder when composing the next message with this account.
I believe the account's Drafts mailbox has some corruption and this should resolve it.

Messages stuck in AQ

DB version: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.3.1
A small number of messages stuck in a queue table when our messaging system load is high.
The 'state' column has value '3' in all these rows. What does that mean ?
Why they are stuck over there ?
thanks
We got following rows when query the queue table:
SQL> select * from trans_t_2;
Q_NAME MSGID
CORRID
PRIORITY STATE
DELAY
EXPIRATION
TIME_MANAGER_INFO
LOCAL_ORDER_NO CHAIN_NO CSCN DSCN
ENQ_TIME
ENQ_UID ENQ_TID
DEQ_TIME
DEQ_UID DEQ_TID RETRY_COUNT
EXCEPTION_QSCHEMA EXCEPTION_QUEUE STEP_NO
RECIPIENT_KEY DEQUEUE_MSGID SENDER_NAME
SENDER_ADDRESS
SENDER_PROTOCOL
USER_DATA(STORE_ID)
USER_PROP()
AQ$_TRANS_T_2_E 495DCB163CD07743E040A8C039014231
:EMAILDRIVER:
0 3
0
0 0 0 0
26-MAR-08 03.22.56.895319 PM
WIRELESS 34.16.7968
0
TRANS_Q_2 0
0
TRANS_STORE_OBJECT(738922)
AQ$_TRANS_T_2_E 495E82B0D97B33BBE040A8C0390145BC
:EMAILDRIVER:
0 3
0
0 0 0 0
26-MAR-08 03.22.56.914877 PM
WIRELESS 2.34.522909
0
TRANS_Q_2 0
0
TRANS_STORE_OBJECT(738924)

Hello,
The messages are not stuck they have expired and been placed in the default exception queue AQ$_TRANS_T_2_E. The messages will have been put in the queue for the EXPIRATION_REASON given in the AQ$TRANS_T_2 view. The messages will have been placed in the exception queue by the qmon processes for that reason and when designing your application you need to consider the possibility that messages may be placed in the exception queue and what you intend to do when they are placed there.
When examining the state of messages in the queues associated with a queue table you should be querying the view AQ$TRANS_T_2 and not the underlying objects. The view interprets the underlying values for you and gives consistent information generated from all the objects associated with a queue table.
Thanks
Peter

Java Proxy stuck in JPRRqst Queue

Hi,
I try to do Synchronous process between RFC to Java Proxy. it was wokrikg fine but suddenly Messages stuck in queue.
RFC sends a message after mapping. I looked sxmb_moni it looks like message delivered to Java Proxy but it didn't. after a while outbound service interface gives "no response" error because of time out. but when i look at http://*****:50000/mdt/Systatus    proxy messages stuck in JPRRqst Queue
Queue Name   Threads Assigned/Working
JPRRqst           11/11
My proxy didn't even start. Strange thing this process did work fine and when this error happens, I receive different data from data that come from RFC. example
RFC sends
MANDT   001
MATNR   3N5979
SERVICE_ID 16261
But i receive
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Z************ xmlns:ns0="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
   <I_TPARTAV>
      <MANDT>000</MANDT>
      <MATNR>979</MATNR>
      <SERVICE_ID>0000</SERVICE_ID>
Have you any ideas?

try this - in RWB in msg monitoring at AE level see the msgs for this scenario......try to find first msg in error and cancel it...then see whether ur remaining msgs are getting processed or not........

Exchange Performance - Submission Queue

Good afternoon,
We've been having issues recently with the Submission queue filling up on our sole Exchange 2010 mail server running Windows Server 2008 R2; emails are still being processed, just at a slower pace than they are being received, causing delays between
when someone sends an email to us and when the email is received. In addition just being on the mail server everything feels slow and sluggish. Sometimes the mail server will be maxed out on memory but other times memory usage will be lower (like
right now for example memory usage is at 46%), however CPU usage is never too high and network usage doesn't seem too high to me either, yet even still at the moment we have 1100 messages in the Submission queue. I'd like to provide our server specifications
and what we're running on the server below and would appreciate it if someone could tell me if the server should be able to handle this load adequately (on a side note I realize we may have a lot running on this one server and that this is not optimal):
Server specs:
- 2 Xeon 5650 Processors/12 Cores total @ 2.67 GHz
- 32 GB DDR3 RAM @ 1333 MHz
We have 121 mailboxes on the server, running all 3 main Exchange roles (Hub Transport, Mailbox, and Client Access). We have maybe 40 phones and iPads connecting as well. We also have the following running on the server:
- GFI MailEssentials (anti-spam software)
- GFI FaxMaker (for sending and receiving faxes through Outlook)
- IIS hosting our main website (~200 hits a day), 3 web applications that are what I would consider pretty lightly used, the MailEssentials configuration site and Exchange stuff like OWA
- Hyper-V hosting a virtual machine running Windows Server 2008 R2 running nothing but Blackberry Enterprise Server (assigned 2 GB memory, no processor reserve set)
We are a small to medium-size business and I feel as if our server should be able to handle the above, can anyone provide any input on this? I appreciate the help!

Thanks for the reply, I've never noticed any peformance issues with either of our domain controllers but I have never tried rebooting them when this happens so I'll have to try this next week and report back. We have two domain controllers on
slightly-lower spec machines than our mail server; the domain controller I consider the "primary" (though I know it doesn't work that way anymore) is also our "primary" internal DNS server, DHCP server, WSUS server, and hosts a file share
storing dat files for users to download McAfee updates from, so not doing too much (in my opinion). The other domain controller (our "backup") is also our SQL Server (supporting 4 applications and tables for a variety of Access databases),
"backup" internal DNS server, and hosts a virtual machine which hosts our accounting software; I've noticed small performance issues with this machine once in awhile but nothing major. For reference we only have 124 user accounts
and 150 computer accounts total in Active Directory. Could it be that our Exchange server is connecting to this slower "backup" domain controller and this is what's slowing it down? Thanks again for your help!

Sometimes one message blocked the whole queue

Now I am developing a MDB in weblogic to consume the TIBCO jms queue and I have deployed the MDB properly. And normally it runs ok.
But sometimes there is one message in the queue that can not be consumed by the MDB .And also this message blocked the following messages to be consumed. We don't know what is the reason.
If we redeploy the MDB, it will continue the process and we have checked that the message that has blocked the queue is correct.
Wait for your answer.
Thanks a lot.

I think this may be an example of a "poison message". This is a message that causes an exception during consumption in the MDB causing a transaction rollback and putting the message back on the queue.
Possible solutions:
1. Some messaging server allow you to move a message out of the queue after a set number of failed deliveries
2. Handle this exception in your code - check the validity of the message first and proceed only if the message is valid, otherwise exit gracefully without doing any work.
Hope this helps!

Sending a private message on a public Queue

Hi,
I would like to know if it is possible to send a message on a public Queue, after explicitly indicating who is able to extract it, so that any other client (malicious or not) would not be able to read it.
Thank's

JMS does not address security other than providing basic username/password parameters on the ConnectionFactory interface. You would need to consult your JMS vendor's specific security capabilities. Most vendors do support secure destinations using user/name password, LDAP integration for credentials and encrypted mesaging using SSL.

Messages stuck in "Retry" in Submission Queue - Exchange 2013

Hello,
We have 2013 Exchange consisting of 2 CASs and 2 MBX servers spanning two locations via VPN, 1 of each server in each location. We are hosting exchange for an outside domain, and have just transferred them into our organization within the last month. There
are two users who consistently have messages stuck in the "Retry" status in the submission queue. Not all of their messages, but usually 2-4 are stuck and eventually kicked back to them.
I have read other forums about a potential issue with conversion to RTF. I have forced the queues empty and attempted this fix, but within a week the users had messages stuck again.
Has anybody run into this and possibly found a fix?

Thank you for all your replies.
It appears this issue has been resolved. At first I made the following change:
Get-RemoteDomain | Set-RemoteDomain -TNEFEnabled $False
Restarted Transport services on both mailbox DB Servers and the messages remained in the queue and more messages were getting stuck.
Then I made this change:
Get-RemoteDomain | Set-RemoteDomain -TNEFEnabled $True
Restarted Transport services on both mailbox DB Servers and the messages cleared from the queues and it seems no more messages are getting stuck as they were before.
I also changed the message timeout from 2 days to 2 hours. I'd rather know sooner than later that a message was stuck. I plan to continue monitoring this.
Thanks again.
Stop Stop Stop, this isn't a solution! Every single post I run into this answer, but it is a real crappy "solution". Simple: there is no solution yet, if everyone take this for an answer there will never we a good answer! This is a work around,
we got mails stucked in the queue for 2 months and it start with no reason. We have every update, enough disk space etc. Settinf the remote domain to true brings you the problem with Apple users and Gmail, hotmail etc. They will receive an email.dat or no
attachment when you send HTML mail. The False or Null is a future that make mail HTML so you can use signatures, pictures etc. It always worked, now only for 2 days and we must reboot again. Set de Remote domain to true we have problems with customers who
doens't receive their email correct!.
Microsoft please solve this problem and stop making crappy excuses or crappy workarounds, a solution is what we need!!!

Messages Stuck in Submission Queue after Database failover to DR site

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for