Messages taking 2 hours to process .

Hi
our system is getting very slow with below warning every second
The adapter failed to transmit message going to send port "SendPort" with URL
"". It will be retransmitted after the retry interval specified for this Send Port.
Details:"System.Transactions.TransactionException: The operation is not
valid for the state of the transaction. ---> System.TimeoutException: Transaction Timeout
a single file is taking 2 hours to process .
probem got resolved by restart the host instance but i want permanent solution .
Regards,

Hi Mohit,
If this happens for all the message in your BizTalk farm, then this issue is due to general health of the server but if it happens to a specific processing then this issue
is due to transaction between BizTalk and your destination system. I feel it’s more to do with second case –between BizTalk and a specific destination system.
Seems like you’re using some transactional adapter..may be WCF-SQL or SAP etc..anyway.
This issue normally occurs if the transaction handshake between BizTalk and destination has not happened on time. You can review you send port’s adapter’s time out property
(it different for adapter used). Check the status of the transaction/message at the destination systems.
Ideally, if a transaction takes longer time, it shall timeout and fail,check your timeout setting for timeout. One option on this to update machine.config file which will
change timeout setting for entire System.Transactions Namespace as mentioned in the following blog (this article not specific to WCF-SAP adapter, this discuss about
transaction timeout):http://blogs.msdn.com/b/biztalknotes/archive/2013/05/03/timeout-issue-with-wcf-sap-biztalk-adapter.aspx
If this happens for the entire message (or atleast to
most, find th
e pattern)
in your BizTalk farm, then this issue is due to general health of the server try running the messagebox viewer as you know and check the performance monitor.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

I am exporting a 2 min video, using a custom compressor setting. i have not had issues with this setting in the past, but recently its taking upwards of 4 hours to process. Any idea what is going on?

I am exporting a 2 min video, using a custom compressor setting. I have not had issues with this setting in the past, but recently its taking upwards of 4 hours to process. Any idea what is going on?

Name: Vimeo HD Encode
Description: No description
File Extension: mov
Estimated size: 2.3 GB/hour of source
Audio Encoder
          AAC, Stereo (L R), 44.100 kHz
Video Encoder
          Width: 1920
          Height: 1080
          Pixel aspect ratio: Square
          Crop: None
          Padding: None
          Frame rate: (100% of source)
          Frame Controls On:
                    Retiming: (Best) High quality Motion Compensated
                    Resize Filter: Statistical Prediction
                    Deinterlace Filter: Best (Motion Compensated)
                    Adaptive Details: On
                    Antialias: 0
                    Detail Level: 0
                    Field Output: Progressive
          Codec Type: H.264
          Multi-pass: On, frame reorder: On
          Pixel depth: 24
          Spatial quality: 75
          Min. Spatial quality: 25
          Key frame interval: 30
          Temporal quality: 50
          Min. temporal quality: 25
          Average data rate: 5.12 (Mbps)
Compatible with Mac
My video in the timeline is 1920 x 1080 / 23.98 fps
I've installed Toast and photoshop elements recently, i also updated my apps the other day.
I have had this problem before the updates of the apps though

Is itunes down? Message for hours says unable to process credit card purchases.

Is itunes down? Message for hours says unable to process credit card purchases.

I was having this exact issue when I was set up to use PayPal as my payment method. I fixed it by -
1. going to my iTunes account and selecting None as my method of payment, then clicking Done
2. confirming this on my account page - which then said Add (or Set up, I can't remember) a Credit Card
3. on the Add a credit card page, I again set up the exact same PayPal account I had before.
4. I was then taken to the PayPal website to confirm that I wanted to use my PayPal account for iTunes purchases, and finally
5. I was taken back to my account page in iTunes, which looked exactly the same as before BUT...
The next time I tried it, my purchase went straight through! (And this was less than 5 minutes after I'd had the "Credit Card processing is temporarily unavailable" message.)
YMMV, but I guess a similar revalidation process would work for credit cards too.

ITunes 8 taking FOREVER ( 12 hours) to process artwork thumbnails

Anybody else seeing this? Its taking forever to process the artwork thumbnails. It looks like its going out on our shared drive and processing all the media on all the computers on the network (~300GB). Or at least those that are shared. I can't tell for sure because the spinning color wheel of death won't pause so I can see what is going on.
Next question is will each of the computers in the house go through the same painful process with the shared media when upgraded to iTunes 8?
What an idiot I was. 8(

Same problem here (http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1701877&tstart=0). What worked for me, finally, was to quickly hit Stop before the spinning ball appeared and I then checked off for this never to happen automatically in the subsequent dialogue window. It seems to get hung with albums that start with S.

Final Cut Pro x and Compressor 992 hour to process

I edited a 1 hour-40 minute video, on Final Cut Pro X and processed using Apple's Compressor.
I have tried different Operating Systems (Mavericks and Mountain Lion) on two different Mac Computers.
IMac 2.8 Mhz and Mac Book Pro (both 2008)
It has been transcoding to create video to run on Apple Devices, for over 6 days now, and it shows that it will take 992 hours to process.
The same video, some months back, with Mountain Lion, took a couple of days to process.
Question: Why is it taking this long now?
I have tried to get a DVD done, different types of output; none have succeeded.
I guess Apple, has made adjustments to their Operating Systems, to basically render this computers inoperable, forcing customers to buy their latest Mac models.
Yes, I went to the "Genius Bar" at Apple (twice), first they told me to increase the memory, which I did; even though months ago I had videos processed without extra memory.
The second time at the "Genius Bar", after I had installed extra memory, they had nothing to say, except that "they had a friend" with the same problem, but after "the friend" bought a new Mac, the problem was resolved.
I called Apple support and was told to "reset PRAM", which I did. Still the problem persists.
Any ideas?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brankoab/12089286396/

You don't mention how much RAM is in your machines, nor what are the versions of FCP X and the OS.
These can make a lot of difference. If you are trying a long export with very little RAM (and I must say 4GB is *very little* RAM), then it can get bogged down tremendously. Do you have at least 8GB?
How much free RAM is reported in Activity Monitor?
Are you using Mavericks or a previous version of the OS? Mountain Lion was notorious for slowing down to a crawl in such circumstances.
Give us more info, so we can better help.
In the meantime, you might consider exporting just a small section of the movie (use I and O to mark an in and an out point in the timeline) and see how fast it goes; keep Activity Monitor open while you are doing it.

Why materialized view taking hours and yet not created

hi,
i am trying to create the following MV
create materialized view MV1
force on demand
start with date 1 next date2
AS
select query 1--> complex query that return approcimately 2 millions rows
union all
select query2 --> complex query that returns 300K rowsit has been taking hours i.e > 4 hrs and still unable to create the MV
w/o the create materialized view statement i am able to return the results from the union of the 2 queries
what might be the possibility ?
tks & rdgs

Issue could be due to the complexity of your query..Even i faced the same issue when i worked on materialized views.It was taking too long to create materialized view and then we splitted the query and created two materialized views.
Finally created a View for those MV's.You can also try the same
Materialized View Log
When you create a materialized view using the FAST option you will need to create a view log on the base tables.A fast refresh uses materialized view logs to update only the rows that have changed since the last refresh.
When DML changes are made to the master table's data, Oracle stores rows describing those changes in the materialized view log and then uses the materialized view log to refresh materialized views based on the base table. This process is called an incremental or fast refresh.Without a materialized view log, Oracle must reexecute the materialized view query to refresh the materialized view. This process is called a complete refresh.Usually, a fast refresh takes less time than a complete refresh.
You can go through the below link
http://www.lc.leidenuniv.nl/awcourse/oracle/server.920/a96567/repmview.htm
Thanks
Suni

I have been transfeing my DVD footage to I movie using handbreak and the spinning wheel of death has arrived and locked up I movie as I tried to import footage. The message says, "Optimizing movies, processing event DVD" but I can't get out of it.

I have been transfeing my DVD footage to I movie using handbreak and the spinning wheel of death has arrived and locked up I movie as I tried to import footage. The message says, "Optimizing movies, processing event DVD" but I can't get out of it.

Yes I held them down till the apple logo appears, then spinning wheel and repeated boot up process. I only knew it was going round in circles because the charging sound kept repeating every so many seconds.
I am downloading iOS.5.0.1 now to do a complete factory restore. I hope this works. I have been looking online for hours for fixes and I have very little batter on it as its been spinning for hours now.
Why do things like this happen? I am sat there watching tv and one minute the settings folder is there then its not! How does that happen? It just disappear? I hadn't moved it to another folder or deleted it, it just.... went!

Trying to create a Photomerge in Bridge, when the files open in Photoshop ( small jegs ) , I get a error message of " Unable to process latte files " / " null is not an object "

Trying to create a Photomerge in Bridge, when the files open in Photoshop ( small jegs ) , I get a error message of " Unable to process latte files " / " null is not an object "
Please help

Wait a second, Photoshop can make lattes now? Personally I prefer my coffee black, but man have I been under-utilizing this program.

Message filtering in propagation process (stream replication environment)

Hi!
We have fine configured stream replication in star topology:
ORCL2 <=> ORCL1 <=> ORCL3
Where the ORCL1 is "headquarters" and there is no message flow between ORCL2 and ORCL3.
For some reason we want to filter messages in propagation processes, e.g. DML captured on ORCL1 should be replicated only to ORCL2 or only to ORCL3. There is one propagation process for each "satellite" database.
To solve this problem I have written function:
FUNCTION Replicate_Lcr (
p_lcr IN SYS.lcr$_row_record)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
which will be making a decision whether to pass the message (return 'Y') or not (return 'N').
But there is problem: rule is evaluated and function is executed (there is insert into 'stream_log_lcr' table) but value of the expression seems to be 'FALSE' and message (LCR) is not beeing sent to ORCL2 (or to ORCL3).
When I remove function 'Replicate_Lcr' from propagation rule condition then every message captured by capture process on ORCL1 reaches destination database (ORCL2 or ORCL3).
The second observation is that, if I run the same code on ORCL2 or ORCL3 then everything seems to be OK: there is insert into 'stream_log_lcr' table and DML captured on ORCL2 (or ORCL3) appears in ORCL1 ("headquarters").
I suppose that this could be problem with other version of database on "headquarters" (ORCL1) or configuration issues.
I will appreciate every suggestion.
Databases:
ORCL1: 64-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.4.0, Windows 2008 server
ORCL2: 32-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.1.0, Windows XP
ORCL3: 32-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.1.0, Windows XP
SQL code run on ORCL1:
CREATE TABLE stream_log_lcr (
data DATE NOT NULL,
msg SYS.lcr$_row_record NOT NULL
-- simplified, always return 'Y'
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Replicate_Lcr (
p_lcr IN SYS.lcr$_row_record)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
IF p_lcr IS NOT NULL
THEN
INSERT INTO stream_log_lcr
VALUES (SYSDATE,
p_lcr);
COMMIT;
END IF;
RETURN 'Y';
END;
-- create propagation process with above function in rule condition
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.add_schema_propagation_rules
(schema_name => 'data_schema',
streams_name => 'primary_to_secondary2',
source_queue_name => 'strmadmin.capture_primary',
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.from_primary@ORCL2',
include_dml => TRUE,
include_ddl => TRUE,
source_database => 'ORCL1',
and_condition => ' strmadmin.Replicate_Lcr(:dml) = ''Y'' ',
inclusion_rule => TRUE,
queue_to_queue => TRUE);
END;
-- check if function 'Replicate_Lcr' was evoked:
SELECT * FROM stream_log_lcr ORDER BY data;

hi porzer,
In Propagation process ( source) also 0 errors. But in apply ( dest ) under statistics under server status is displaying as IDLE. And Coordinator status is APPLYING. In Capture (source) no error. In Applying ( dest ) no error. what else i can do please?
up to now what i did i am telling:
I had 2 databases had one table same table. one database i changed the mode to ARCHIVELOG mode. Another database is in NOARCHIVELOG mode only. In first database setup streams i run. And i run manually 2 .sql files and one .dat file like this :
SQL>@e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_SETUP.sql
SQL>host e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_exportimport.bat
SQL>@e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_startup.sql
Any thing else i can do? i didn't have metalink registration.i hope i am not boring you.
Thanks in advance.

With one condition included my discoverer report is taking hours to run

Hi,
I am trying to build a discoverer report based on a view and i have defined couple of conditions as per the business requirement. Here is my view which is executing fine from database and at discoverer level.
Now the requirement is to get the details with conditions
1. Application_date is not equal to apply date
2. Applied_amount>0
parameters should be
Application_date low and high
The report is successfully executing when i use condition1 that is application_date<>apply date with parameters mentioned.
But when i define second condition at report level that applied_amount>0, its taking hours to run.
Please advise me the way to use this condition2 so that it should be executed in normal time.
Thanks,
Prathyusha.
Edited by: 958913 on Oct 10, 2012 1:28 PM

Hi Srini,hussein,
Thanks so much.
Yes srini that is related to my post. I have tried all the options to make that condition workout. But hard luck i could nt able to make this work out.
Im still wondered my query is successfully getting executed in database fine and when i give any condition on applied amount its taking hours to run from discoverer desktop and i dont find it executed anytime till now.
I am not sure about enabling this trace option as i reviewed the ID's suggested by you and seems that all needs to be done with the help of DBA. But i dont have that much time to make this workout. This is an immediate business requirement and i have never seen this problem anytime with discoverer desktop.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Prathyusha.

After upgrading to 27, firefox will not start. Saw an error message during the upgrade process.

After upgrading to 27, firefox will not start. Saw an error message during the upgrade process but cannot remember.
Tried to run firefox.exe -P but receive error message:
XML Parsing error: undefined entity
Location: chrome://mozapps/content/profile/profileSelection.xul
Line number 18, Column 1:
<dialog
^
Running on Windows XP SP3. No problem whatsoever before upgrading to 27. Sending this from Chrome as I cannot open Firefox at all.

Thanks jschaer2000: after starting it once in safe mode, I closed Mozilla and tried several restarts in normal mode. So far, all worked:-)
Thank you very much again.
Still the automatic update process bothers me: it took me several days to discover the reason to the malfunction, since when I removed the problematic version from Add and Remove Programs, I didn't pay attention at first that it was another version, not v26 which I installed from my folder.
In addition, I like to save the installation files before I run new programs and if I didn't have v26 exe file, I couldn't have operated Mozilla at all. Not that it was fun to remove and install again each time v27 didn't react, but it was better than nothing, I still prefer Mozilla over its competition.

Bulky Message are not getting processed

Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded our XI systems to EHP4.
After upgrade Bulky files are not getting processed into XI system. Small files are getting processed successfully.
Earlier we had faced same issue at that time we have maintained some parameters in transaction RZ10, RZ11, SXMB_ADM-->
Integration Configuration--> HTTP time out parameter.
Same parameters are still there. But now the message is not getting processed in XI when we check into sxi_monitor. Message mapping is also not seems to be a problem as we havnt put any bulky logic over there.
The message is not getting processed ahead of Receiver Grouping . Please find attached log from Performanceheader
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:PerformanceHeader xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134229.930472</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="ADAPTER_IN">INTEGRATION_ENGINE_HTTP_ENTRY</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.052577</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.059576</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="CORE">INTEGRATION_ENGINE</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.07151</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134232.071518</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_ENTRY_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.239947</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.241179</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134237.250385</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134239.999045</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001292</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.001413</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="PLSRV">PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="end" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026156</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
- <SAP:RunTimeItem>
<SAP:Name type="DBQUEUE">DB_SPLITTER_QUEUING</SAP:Name>
<SAP:Timestamp type="begin" host="evoxicqab">20091210134240.026164</SAP:Timestamp>
</SAP:RunTimeItem>
</SAP:PerformanceHeader>

Hi
Have you checked this thread, same discussion here
Performance of XI Interfaces
Also check this blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/08/xi-timeouts-timeouts-timeouts
Regards
Ramesh

Correlate MDN to AS2 message using an integration process

Hello,
I had a similar question in a previous thread but closed it as the problem might have not been to clear.
Problem is that we have to use BPM for an AS2 scenario and correlate the MDN back to the process as we need BPM functionalities such as error handling and time-outs as well as some data enrichment.
Problem is even when I request the MDN synchronously on Adapter Level it is delivered as asynchronous message back. So I need to figure out how to correlate it.
MDN contains the messageID so I tried to use the messageID of the original message as correlation. However problem is that a new message ID is assigned when the message is sent by the integration process and the second on is used then as ID in the MDN.
It seems to me that it is therefore not possible at alle to correlate the MDN? However this is a definitive requirement so I am really stuck at the moment.
Do you have any idea?
Thank you very much!

Hello,
well, actually the correlation itself would work as I extract the messageID in a transformation step and then activate the correlation in a send step.
If I check the flag "Refer MDN to XI" in AS2 receiver channel the MDN is delivered back to the integration server and the original messageID is then part of the MDN message payload.
However, and that is the big problem, the MDN uses the second messageID that is created when sending the message from the integration process (and not the first one when the message is sent from sender and process by the integration process).

Split message mapping to integration process

Hi,
I faced an error when trying to send a multiple message (after a message split) to an integration process and I would like to know the possibilities to resolve this issue.
What I want to do (more details below) :
1. Get an order list from a database
2. Split the order list in multiple orders (via a multi-mapping)
3. For each order, create a new integration process instance
The error I got is:
Messages in multi message format can be sent to one adapter engine only
The solutions I thought of:
- Creating a new integration process / Update the existing integration process in order to execute the message split in the process engine
- Create a new service (or business system) as a receiver instead of the process that points back to another XI service and set-up the appropriate configuration between the second service and the existing integration process
My question: is there another solution than the two above?
Thanks in advance
Here are the details of what I did:
1. A JDBC request returns an order list like:
<resultSet>
 <row>
 <order>[...order 1 details...]</order>
 </row>
 <row>
 <order>[...order 2 details...]</order>
 </row>
</resultSet>
2. During interface determination phase, a multi-mapping is executed to produce several orders:
<order>[...order 1 details...]</order>
<order>[...order 2 details...]</order>
3. The target receiver is an integration process who take as initial document only one order ; so, having two orders as a result of the split, I would like XI to create two new instances of my integration process, each receiving exactly one order.
And there's when the above error occured.

Hi Alexis
Creating a new integration process is suggested as your target receiver is your current integration process and along with this splitting and passing data to multiple receiver can be done in integration process.
Thanks
Mitesh

Message split in pipeline processing

Hi,
Can anybody explain what is mean by "message split in pipeline processing" ??
Thanks in advance
Kumar

pipeline Services Messages received at the integration server through a defined deries of steps
For more info:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714f85ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/b714f85ffc11d5b3ea0050da403d6a/frameset.htm</a>
<a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible">Message Split</a>

Messages taking 2 hours to process .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for