Meta Tags DO matter

Hi
I have run some tests and despite what most people say, the Meta tags do make a big difference in SEO,.... with iWeb anyway.
When I enter meta tags for my site www.teachabroadthailand.com i get listed for my target keywords and description. When I don't enter the Meta tags, my site description come up with all this garble in the summary.
Trouble is, I have to use another FTP client to go in and enter the Meta tags each time I edit the site. This is infuriating and somewhat defeats the purpose of using iWeb.
I'm baffled as to why iWeb cannot allow such a simple, but still very important, feature.
Also since I upgraded to iLife 09 my iWeb has become buggy. The site doesn't display properly on IE8.
Any suggestions?
Thanks

A lot of us use iWeb SEO Tool to add tags.
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/SearchEngines/Tags.html
There are a lot of features that could and should be added to iWeb. All this stuff has been suggested over and over but nobody listens.
iWeb needs to have both an optimizer and a way to enter meta data.
The developers seem to have burned their brains out on their dysfunctional FTP and haven't yet got around to fixing the actual bugs.

Similar Messages

  • Coldfusion developr version meta tag

    I'm using coldfusion developer version. So when i execute a
    coldfusion template, there is a meta tag in the source code.
    Therefore I can't use coldfusion generated XML data as a Flex data
    source. If any one know avoid this problem please help me. I'm
    trying to lear flex.
    Thank you,
    Buddhika

    buddhika23 wrote:
    > I'm using coldfusion developer version. So when i
    execute a coldfusion
    > template, there is a meta tag in the source code.
    Therefore I can't use
    > coldfusion generated XML data as a Flex data source. If
    any one know avoid this
    > problem please help me. I'm trying to lear flex.
    > Thank you,
    > Buddhika
    >
    Do you have the devnet edition? As far as I know the
    developer edition
    you download from adobe.com doesn't do this, but the old
    Macromedia
    DevNet edition had this problem. Quickest solution is just to
    reinstall
    CF using the developer edition that you can download from
    adobe.com
    Matt
    Matt Woodward
    [email protected]
    Adobe Community Expert - ColdFusion

  • How about adding a meta tag to the index file.....

    This is another way to get verified with Google and other search engines. Does anyone know a way that you could add a meta tag to the index file generated by iweb??
    Thanks for any help....Matt
    http://www.want2takecredit.com

    I'm glad it worked. Nevertheless you might think of uploading an html file as well. The index.html sometimes gets overwritten by iweb, thus the meta-tag would disappear and you would have to do it again. The html file instead stays where it is.
    Here's how to procede:
    When they will ask you to verify that it really is your website. “Choose verification method” select “Upload an HTML file” and now you will have to build that verification file (here’s a How-to by Roddy).
    1. Go to your applications folder and launch Text Edit.
    2. Don't put anything on the blank page.
    3. Select File/Save As.
    4. In the popup window "Save As" box enter your Google number (something like google05a23d347cXXXXXX )
    5. In the "Where" box select desktop.
    6. In "File Format" menu select HTML.
    7. Click "Save".
    8. A file will appear on your desktop called google05a23d347cXXXXXX.html
    9. This is what you upload to your server or iDisk.
    Upload that file to your main folder on your server so that it will be http://www.yoururl.com/google05a23d347cXXXXXX.html (not in the subfolder of the Sites folder named with the title of your site...*).
    For .Mac go to the Finder menu and select Go/iDisk/My iDisk/ or hit SchiftCommand(Apple)i and then go to /Web/Sites/. Drop your file into the "Sites" folder
    Entering: http://web.mac.com/username/google05a23d347cXXXXXX.html in your browser should bring up this file. If it doesn’t you placed the file in the wrong location.
    Entering: http://yourbaseurl.com/google05a23d347cXXXXXX.html in your browser should bring up this file. If it doesn’t you placed the file in the wrong location.
    Regards,
    Cédric
    +I just noticed your other posts on the forum and that you got it solved I'll leave the explanation for other people wondering and stumbling over the thread+

  • How do I add multiple scripts from search engines to my meta tag properties?

    I currently have copied the goolge script for website varification and analytics, etc and pasted it into my meta tag properties dialog box. There is no problem as far as Google varifying the page. However, I would like to copy Bing's search engine script into my meta tag in addition to Googles script. How do I go about doing this? Do I hit the return on my keyboard under the ending of Googles script, then paste in the Bing script?
    The the last part of the Google script ending in this:
    </script>
    (paste new script from Bing here?)
    Will this cancel out each other and cause problems?
    Can someone walk me through this process, because Bing's search engine will not varify my site through two of the three other methods.
    Ben

    Adding a script after the closure of previous script is the way to go i.e. right after the </script> tag.
    So it should look something like below:
    <script>
    Google's script
    </script>
    <script>
    Bing's script
    </script>
    Cannot comment on one interfering with the other since it really depends on what exact code is there in the scripts. Google and Bing help resources will be able to help more with this.
    Thanks,
    Vikas

  • Adding meta tags to published web site

    I have created my website using iWeb and subsequently downloaded the RAVE SEO tool and used it to add for meta tags to my sites (description and keywords).
    I followed this procedure:
    1) I published my site from iWeb to a local folder on my iMac
    2) I added the meta tags using the RAVE SEO tool
    3) I tried to publish the site to my webhotel with tags added using the ftp tool in the RAVE SEO tool.
    PROBLEM:
    when I publish from the SEO tool, it is the old sites which are published. In my local folder where I started out publishing the web site to, I can see that the tags from description and keywords have been added. But the site which is published does not contain the tags.
    I have a feeling that the SEO tool is looking in a wrong foder, but I cannot change the folder using the "FTP Details" funktion in the SEO tool.
    Do anyone have a suggestion for what to do?
    Thanks,
    Klaus

    I have a feeling that the SEO tool is looking in a wrong foder, but I cannot change the folder using the "FTP Details" funktion in the SEO tool.
    When you click publish and choose FTP you can create a new setup or use an existing one.
    And if you do not know which folder to publish to, click browse. You decide.
    !http://www.wyodor.net/_Discussions/SEOToolFTP.png!
    Message was edited by: Wyodor

  • Can't get a web page to validate with meta tags with w3c??

    I have created a website for my school projects, and every week I have to add something to it for the course, and every monday I have to submit my code in a zipped folder to the professor, after running it through the w3c validation page, and passing, This current week, I was instructed to swork on SEO for my site, and add meta tags to the site to fish for traffic, and then I have to validate it through w3c and submit. Well, I did not complete this because w3c would not validate my page until I removed every single meta tag from the code, and I cannot for the life of me understand the error that is holding me back. So, in an effort to see if I could get some help here, I have included my code, and will try to explain what is happening and the code as well as the error from the validator service. Please have a look, help me, because I am totally lost here....
    Thanks in advance!!
    zlloyd1
    This is my code:
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <title>zlloyd on the web</title><meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylez.css" />
    </head>
    <body><div id="container"><h1>ZLLOYD ON THE WEB</h1> <div id="navbar"><a href="about.html">About me</a> <a href="OceanView.html">Ocean View</a> <a href="swimming.html">Swimming</a> <a href="gaming.html">Gaming</a> <a href="BBall.html">Basketball</a></div><div><a href="gaming.html"><img src="images/Gaming-Desktop-Configuration.jpg" width="107" height="239" alt="console" /></a><a href="BBall.html"><img src="images/300px-Basketball_pictogram.svg.png" width="82" height="76" alt="BallinGuy" /></a><a href="swimming.html"><img src="images/swimming.jpg" width="100" height="237" alt="Strokin" /></a></div></div>
    <a href="contactsupport.html">Support </a>
    </body>
    </html>
    and this is what w3c says when I try to validate the page:
    Line 5, Column 131: there is no attribute "fttp-equiv"
    …mputers, swimming" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; chars…

    You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).
    This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error message for further information.
    How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute, (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or use CSS instead of this attribute. If you received this error when using the <embed> element to incorporate flash media in a Web page, see the FAQ item on valid flash.
    What in the world does this mean, because I am seriously lost on this, and the only way I could get around this was to completely remove the entire line, "<meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />", which removed all of my meta tags completely, in order to validate it?? I cannot see what is setting this thing off like that, I have never gottena validation error before, and I now know that they are written as meaningless gibberish that does not even remotely explain what is wrong, at least not to me....
    Please help!!!!

    Line 4 and line 5 are trying to do the same thing. Take out the
    <meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    line entirely and you will be good.

  • How do I add Meta tags to pages?

    Is it possible to add meta tag information for the pages (such as keywords, description, robots, etc.) directly in Muse?
    I'd like to add meta tag data to describe the page to help with search engine optimization.

    I found a lot of useful information on here: http://www.muse-themes.com/blogs/news/6103624-seo-in-adobe-muse-search-engine-optimization #comments
    However I would like to know: If you have multiple pages dealing with different topics does one need to adjust the meta-data accordingly for each page.
    For example, I am redoing a website for a small earthmoving contractor who offers a range of services including new lawn installation (NOT mowing!), drainage, landscaping, post hole boring, driveways - to name a few; these are essentially the main pages with content explaining each service a little further.
    So would I be correct in assuming I should have a unique description, keywords and (obviously) page title for each page?
    How about the home page? Should the metadata attempt to cover all services offered within the website as a whole, or just the content of the home page?
    Thanks in advance!

  • How do i add a META tag through mobile me?

    Hello, Im trying to get my site verified on google using a meta tag.
    Im not very computer literate. I can understand if some one can explain it to me. I know nothing about html or how it view or edit my site in html. I have read a few post on it but im kinda looking for a how too. Iv been told i can do it thorough iDisk, is that true?
    Thanks in advance!
    ~Shawn

    I did everything on step 10. When i entered http://www.bassettmotorsport.com/googled7196264e0f76d4d.html in the browser, my site came up (as expected) when that happens did it work? Nex next step (11) said it could take 2 weeks (that fine). Did i do everything correctly?
    Thanks!
    ~Shawn
    Message was edited by: Shawnbassett26

  • How do I add Meta tags to my website

    I have produced a website in i web and published it to my .mac account.
    I need to know how to add meta tags to get it recognised by the search engines.
    The company I am using to do this want the ftp info. As I upload directly to my .mac account I am not sure what they need. Can you help please?

    I think I may have a good workaround here, not sure how it will work with .mac as I dont use it, I am in control of my default page within Apache.
    Create your site as normal within Iweb and publish it.
    Outside of iWeb create your site's real default homepage by hand, that contains the meta tags and that redirects to your iWeb homepage. In this way any Search engine hits to your site will hit the external page first, reading the meta tags then get redirected to your real home page. Not ideal of course but at least you don't have to keep an eye on your metatag's being overwritten by republishing your homepage.
    Here is the code from mine, it appears to work:
    +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://+
    +www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title></t+
    +itle><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url= Welcome.html" />+
    +<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="enter,your,keywords,here">
    +<META NAME="description" CONTENT="description of your website">+
    </head><body></body></html>
    This page will redirect to the "Welcome.html" page created in iWeb.
    Hope this helps.
    Message was edited by: berrymp

  • How can I check if there are meta tags and description tags for my pages on website?

    I want to check if the pages on my website have keywords or meta tags and description. How can I do that?

    In Contribute, Edit the Page and the click on Format, Keywords and Descriptions.

  • Best practice for implementing META tags for content items?

    Hello,
    The portal site I'm responsible for managing our content (www.sers.state.pa.us) runs on the following WebCenter products:
    WebCenter Interaction 10.3.0.1
    WebCenter Publisher 6.5
    WebCenter Studio 2.2 MP1
    Content Service 10gR3
    The agency I work for is one of many for the commonwealth of PA, which use this product suite, and I'm encountering some confusion on how to apply META tags to the content items for our site, so we can have effective search results. According to the [W3C site's explanation on META tag standards|http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_meta.asp], the tags for description, keywords, etc, should be within the head region of the HTML document. However, with how the WebCenter suite's configuration is set up, the head section of the HTML is closed off by the end of the template code for a common header portlet. I was advised to add fields to our presentation and data entry templates for content, to add these meta fields, however, since they are then placed within the body section of the HTML as a result, these tags fail to have any positive impact on the search results. Instead, many of our content items, when searched for, the description in the search results only shows text that is displayed in the header and left navigation of our template, which come early in the body section of the HTML.
    Please advise as to possible method(s) that would be best to implement usage of META tags so we can get our pages containing content to come up in search results with this relevant data.
    Thanks in advance,
    Brian

    if i remember right the index server will capture meta tags even if they are not in the <head> section. it is not well formed html but I think i remember that we created meta tags down in the body section and the index server still picked them up. you might try this and see if it still works. i believe it worked in 10gR3. Let me know your results.

  • Best Practice for Placing meta tags in HEAD of document

    Good afternoon,
    We are utilizing Oracle UCM's ability to dynamically generate pages based on page templates, region templates, and contributor data files that contributors may edit and publish. We have a specific need to include meta tags in the head section of each page that are custom to the data present in each contributor data file. Including the meta tags in the region template that pertains to a section of our website does not work, as it does not include a <head> section. Alternatively, I can not place the meta tags in the page template, as the data in each meta tag is specific to the metadata surrounding each contributor data file.
    My question is this: Is there a best practice, or Oracle-supported method of accomplishing this task? I have to believe there is some way to accomplish this, as the need for meta tags for social media sites and search engines is very common.
    Thank you very much for your time,
    Josh

    Thanks for the reply, Jiri.
    I believe that the answer is 'yes' to both of your questions above. I do have a question about the formatting of the meta tag itself, as my main question is how do I extract the needed information from a particular CDF so that it is displayed in the <head> section located in the page template.
    I have a Region Definition for the content section of my page with a 'Title' field, which a contributor can fill in, save, and create a Contributor Data File with their own specified title. Let's also say that my page template, which formats the entire page, looks like this (rough):
    <html>
      <head>
      <title>Web page</title>
      </head>
      <body>
      <!-- placeholder for header section -->
      <!-- placeholder for content section -->
      <!-- placeholder for footer section -->
      </body>
    </html>
    What would my <meta> tag look like for the following:
      <meta property="og:title" content="Title of the content section"/>
    Let's name our templates/definitions:
    Page Template: PT_META
    Region Template: RT_META
    Region Definition: RD_META
    Contributor Data File: CDF_META
    In other words, how do I extract the information included in the Contributor Data File (as well as its metadata) for use in the Page Template? Is there some sort of Idoc Script call that can be used?
    Thank you so much,
    Josh

  • Meta Tag Placement in pages created from a template

    I am updating a site and want to make sure that I place my meta tags correctly in individual pages created from a template. Can you tell me if my placement is correct?
    Below is code I added to my template:
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <!-- TemplateBeginEditable name="doctitle" -->
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    <!-- TemplateEndEditable -->
    <!-- #BeginEditable "metatags" --> <!-- #EndEditable -->
    <style type="text/css">
    <!--
    body {
    Here is what a page I created looks like after adding the meta tags:
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><!-- InstanceBegin template="/Templates/2011 Main .dwt" codeOutsideHTMLIsLocked="false" -->
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="doctitle" -->
    <title>Long Island, NY, 11550 Music Dance  Art &amp; Drama Lessons</title>
    <!-- InstanceEndEditable -->
    <!-- #BeginEditable "metatags" -->
    <meta name="keywords" content="piano lessons, guitar lessons, drum lessons, flute lessons, violin lessons, afterschool performing arts, voice lessons, singing, saxophone, trumpet">
    <meta name="description" content="Information about Young Musician Institute's Afternoon Arts Program for piano, guitar, drums, violin, viola, trumpet, saxophone and cello">
    <!-- #EndEditable -->
    <style type="text/css">
    <!--
    body {
    As usually, Begin and end editable sections are grayed out, and the meta tag names are blue according to my scheme so I think I am doing it correctly, however, I want to be sure before submitting it to google incorrectly. Can you tell me if I am correct?
    Thank you

    for clarification, are you saying that I could have put them on the line after:
    <title>Long Island, NY, 11550 Music Dance  Art &amp; Drama Lessons</title>
    Yep.
    Second, adding these meta tags actually did help the ranking of this company. They were not listed before I did this on their old site. They were on page 1 of their category hours after I did this for them.
    I think it's just coincidence.  However, for sure it wasn't the keywords that did that, since those are just ignored (the meta keywords contents, not the meta description contents).
    what are the search engines looking for? I want to make sure to design with those things in mind.
    They are looking for semantic content on the page.  That means the contents of tags like <title>, <h1>, <h2>, <h3>.  That also means (derived) keywords contained in content 'above the fold', and in filenames, in links, in title and alt attributes.  In other words, search engines want to rank your pages based on *real* meaning of the contents of the page, not on some arbitrary listing of keywords that you place in a meta keyword tag.
    Search engines also pay lots of attention to INCOMING links from other well ranked sites....

  • Custom HTML meta tags in head section

    We want to add custom HTML code to our html-type (HTMLHelp,
    FlashHelp, WebHelp) output.
    We know how to add HTML code to the <body> section, by
    selecting from RoboHelp's main top menu "Insert > HTML".
    We also know how to add HTML code to multiple topics at once,
    by adding the HTML code to the header and/or footer or a template,
    and linking the relevant topics to that template.
    We now want to add HTML code (in particular, custom META
    tags) to the <head> section. However, it appears that the
    content of the template header appears in the <body> section.
    Of course, we could run a search-and-replace-all on our
    existing topics, to replace existing HTML code on the <head>
    section with our custom code. But we would need to remember to do
    this each time we add a new topic. It is not a big deal, but this
    does not seem to be a very efficient way of doing this.
    We figure that there must be some type of collection of
    HTML-templates that RoboHelp uses each time a new topic is created,
    to automatically insert some standard HTML code. But, do we have
    easy access to such HTML-templates? Where are they stored?
    Thanks for you help!

    Have you tried working in the "True Code" editor? This seems
    to be all you need to do.
    John

  • I am not able to share a blogpost image on facebook using the open graph meta-tag for the blogpost image.

    Dear Members,
    I am wrestling a few days now, and still not able to get a blogpost image into the facebook share-box.
    This is the link where i am talking about:
    Top 10 Celebrities on Holiday in Saint Tropez
    I have 2 issues:
    1
    Below ( under the blog-post ) you'll find my facebook like button.
    When i like the blog-post, the share-box pops up BUT without the blog image.
    I put the link in the debugger window from Facebook, but it tells me that the open graph tag for a image is not proper defined.
    this is the link to facebook debugger : https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/
    So i created this meta-tag :  <meta property="og:image" content="/_assets/images/blog/img-{tag_blogpostid}.jpg" />
    and put it inside the head of the html code for the detailed blog post lay-out ( site-manager/module-templates/Blog lay-outs/Blog post detail lay-out )
    2
    I dont know how i must specify the URL to be liked on facebook.
    My blog-list url = http://www.duvanduvan.com/blog  BUT i have to specify the url for a single blogpost item, but have no idea what to specify. i tried different url's like : duvanduvan.com/blog/{tag_itemurl} etc.... with no result
    Can you also help me out here?
    I really tried everything i possibly know off but without result :-(
    Can somebody help me out here?
    Much much appreciated.
    Stefan.

    try selecting music from the top bar check the songs you want, then sync

Maybe you are looking for