Metadata Only checkin HTML creation - all fields???

Here are the steps that I am following and the problem I am having.
I am using a profile that has 5 or 6 fields selected, some hidden some required to check in metadata only.
When it creates the htm page that displays the metadata only, it is returning what looks like almost all of the metadata fields available in our system. meaning I am getting more than just the 5 or 6 fields in my profile.
How can I modify that?

Thanks for the reply Jason.
Yes I am using a profile for this checkin.
The xprofiletrigger is kicking in and working correctly on the document info page... it's only showing corresponding fields (unless I choose "full" to view all fields).
The problem is the html page it is creating for the web viewable file, it lists all of the metadata fields. The bigger issue is there is a criteria workflow assigned to these checkin's and the email that is being generated as notification is really ugly as it seems to be displaying this htm page.
And no, there doesn't seem to be anything overriding the profile rules. It's a pretty plain jane profile with only a handfull of fields with nothing tricky to them.
Other thoughts?

Similar Messages

How can anyone add to a SharePoint list but only some can edit all fields?

My office has a list on our SharePoint for product requests. We were trying to make it so that the "+Add Item" link was available to all who want to request a map but only specific fields such as Name or Description would be editable on their
end. Once the item is in the system, the SharePoint admins in our office could update things like Status or Analyst. However, after talking to the individual in charge of our SharePoint permissions told us that we cannot set this basic ability to "everybody"
and instead need to create a special group with limited permissions. Unforunately we have high-turnover between our office and other locations and see this causing a problem in the near future. Is there a work around such as creating a web app or form that
will push the necessary data into the SharePoint list or maybe just send it via email to designated recipients in our office to process it?

I do not see any simple solutions here. You have various options, each with different limitations and each will require some effort to implement. Mix and match as best meets your needs:
Create a standard list as usual*. In the lists's Advanced settings, in the Item-Level Permissions group, select the options Read all items and Create items and edit items that were created by the user. This approach lets users create their own items
and edit them, and they can still view other's, but they cannot edit other's. Note: some list templates do not provide the Item-Level Permissions group of settings.
Create a custom permissions level: copy it from Contribute. Remove all of the Edit and Delete list permissions. This approach lets your users create new and view existing entries, but not delete or edit them.
Configure Incoming Email, and email-enable the target list. You can configure the list to accept email according to the permissions that person has with respect to the list. Thus, for example, a person with Contribute permission level would
be able to send email to the list but a person with Read permission level would not.
Create the list. This will also create default New, Edit and View forms. Customize the New form in SharePoint Designer 2013 so as not to display the fields you do not wish the user to edit.
Create new site fields and content types: create one content type that displays only a few of these new fields and the other that displays all of them. Add these to the list. Configure a custom content type as the default for the list that displays
only a few fields. Users will see this content type when they create a new entry. Edit the New list form to display only this content type. Edit the View list form to display only this content type.
References
Configure custom permissions in SharePoint 2013
Configure incoming email for a SharePoint 2013 farm.
Create a custom list form using SharePoint Designer
Create or customize a site content type

Only allow that users write only in uppercase in all fields of ICWEB.

It's possible only allow that users write only in uppercase???
Thanks in advance.
Best

Hi Javier,
I dont think that this is possible for all the attributes as most of them will be standard.
But for custom attributes the case can be controlled from the domain.
Check this thread where users experienced problems with the case of the text.
Change of CASE in ZCOMPONENT ZFields
Here too...user cannot be restricted, but after a server event system takes care of case conversion.
Regards,
Masood Imrani S.

Precision Queue Interval All Fields report can only produce 14 days historical data

Hi All,
I have PCCE 9.0.4. It only had internal database. There is no external database for HDS.
I configured Precision Queue for incoming call agents. When I produce report using "Precision Queue Interval All Fields (PQIAF)" provided by Cisco Stock Report, I can only find 14 days historical data. Referring to PCCE Product Specification doc, internal logger should provide 400 days historical data for PQIAF report.
When I open the report definition, PQIAF is pointing to 3 tables: Router_Queue_Interval, Skill_Group_Interval and Precision_Queue. I found the Router_Queue_Interval only stored 14 days data. Is it normal?
Have anyone found the same problem when PCCE only used internal database?
Please advise,
Heribertus

The logger database for Enterprise only holds 14 days by default. As part of the PCCE install you should have edited the retention period to 400 days. It looks like you missed changing the Router_Queue_Interval table to 400 days.
You need to edit the logger setup. See this link for setting the retention period
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/pcce/pcce_901/installation/guide/PCCE_BK_IBC40C6F_00_installing-and-configuring-pcce/PCCE_BK_ICC40C6F_00_installing-and-configuring-pcce_chapter_0111.html#PCCE_TK_L33657A9_00
Graham

How to lock a form (all fields read only) using a button (JavaScript)

Hi guys,
I have a form with several input fields, check boxes. Using a button in the form, I would like to lock it using a JavaScript. Locking means in my case that all input fields, checkboxes, etc. are read only (cannot be changed anymore).
I already use the following approach:
data.form.MyInputField.access = "readOnly";
The problem is, that this approach is not comforable from maintenance perspective. I would like a more generic or more simple way.
Generic:
loop over all fields and set them to "read only"
Simple:
xfa.form.lock; // but this does not work
Do you have any ideas how to solve this requirement in another way as I currently do?
Thanks,
Thomas

Now I used the following script:
// set the whole form as container
var objContainer = data.Report;
// call the method to set all fields to read only (recursion)
disableAllFields(objContainer);
function disableAllFields(objContainer) {
 for (var i=0; i < objContainer.nodes.length; i++) {
 switch (objContainer.nodes.item(i).className) {
 case "field" :
 case "exclGroup" :
 objContainer.nodes.item(i).access = "readOnly";
 break;
 case "subform" :
 disableAllFields(objContainer.nodes.item(i));
 break;
 default:
It works but is there another possibilitiy such like
form.lock;
Thanks,
Thomas

When I try to bring up Firefox MSN comes up. I can only run Googlemail in HTML. All this happened after I did a Sony VIAO update.

When I try to bring up Firefox MSN comes up. I can only run Googlemail in HTML. All this happened after I did a Sony VIAO update.

Perhaps the PLUGIN Update feature needs to be engaged to assure that both Java and Shockwave editions are current. It requires 'Help' > 'Firefox Help' > where the lower right side displays a link for Plug-In Update...

How to make a page READ ONLY / all fields are DISABLED ?

Hi all,
I am using ONE page to do ADD/EDIT/DISPLAY data. When users are in DISPLAY mode, I want all fields on the page to be read only / disabled.
How is the best approach to do that ?
(other than going to every fields and set the ReadOnly/Disabled property)
Thank you for your help,
xtanto

Hi Xtanto,
My business logic is somewhat different - I don't do this for new/editted rows, but based upon other security. You could certainly set something in your backing bean based upon a user clicking "new" or "edit"
John

Can I checkin as metadata only with CIS?

I set up my UCM 11g server to allow checkin metadata only (no content file)
This is for cases where the content already exists in another item. I will get it from the other item.
I have an application using CIS checking in files using the following api call:
ISCSDocumentCheckinAPI.checkinFileStream(ISCSContext SCSContext, ISCSContent content, ICISTransferStream primaryInputStream, ISCSCheckinFlags checkinFlags)
Does anyone know of a cis call to allow checkin metadata only?
Thanks

iCloud calendar will not do what you are asking. Using Google calendar is a different thing, but I'm not familiar with it and using it with iCloud.

How to display "Metadata Only" field in Update Form

Hi,
I have added the below configuration in Config.cfg file to make Primary File non mandatory,
AllowPrimaryMetaFile=true
suppressAlternateFile=true
createPrimaryMetaFile=true
After restarting the server it displayed "Metadata only" fileld upon selecting Primary File became non mandatory, but while updating the Content this field is not getting displayed, rather it is displaying Original File field and Primary File became mandatory.
Could you please let me know how to make Primary File non mandatory (otherwise displaying "Metadata only") in Update form. Appreciate your help on this. Thank you.
Thanks,
Ashok

Hi Srinath,
Thank you for responding, here we need to make Primary File non mandatory by displaying "Metadata only" field. we achieved this in Check In form, we need the same in Update Form.
From the Kyle blog, he specified that option to completely hide Primary File but our requirement is making non mandatory by introducing metadata only field.
Thanks,
Ashok

Column alias to select all fields in only one table in a join

Hi,
Please can you tell me if it is possible to use something like "SELECT a*" to select all fields in table a when using a join to join 2 tables e.g a and b? Instead of using "select acomlumn1 acomlumn2 acomlumn3" etc.
Thanks and Regards.

HI,
It is not possible... You have to specify all the fields you want to select with the tilde '~' symbol...
or,
The other solution can be to fetch all the fields from the first table and use 'For all entries' of this table to fetch all fields from the other table...
Edited by: sneha singhania on Jun 23, 2009 3:01 PM

Black only error message when all inks are full

My printer ran out of a color some time ago and popped up the black only message box. I have since replaced all of the colored inks and it still gives me the black only message when I go to print and says I need to replace magenta. I just replaced it! My printer is the photosmart C6280. Thank you

Hello Sudharshan,
"Status can only be set when all originals are stored" Also I see that the model is not having Status in CAD VIEW.
This is error is indicating that your original CAD model is not checked in and as per your configuration you require the original to be checked in before moving to next status.
Please:
1. Check your document status network.
2. ensure that you have proper set up for the fields "check in" in the current status. This indicator should be set. This ensures that the document is automatically checked in before moving to the next status. This will solve your problem.
When I double click on that object in CAD VIEW, it takes me to DIR creation screen with Document Type DES. Can someone help me in this ?
Because of the above set up missing the original DIR is missing the original document and hence the system assumes you are creating a new DIR when you click on the object in CAD view.
regards,
N K

CAD VIEW Error : "Status can only be set when all originals are stored"

Hi Friends,
I have Proe to SAP integrated and when I open Proe model in CAD VIEW and try to create a document it shows an error "Status can only be set when all originals are stored" Also I see that the model is not having Status in CAD VIEW.
When I double click on that object in CAD VIEW, it takes me to DIR creation screen with Document Type DES. Can someone help me in this ?
Rgds,
SM

Hello Sudharshan,
"Status can only be set when all originals are stored" Also I see that the model is not having Status in CAD VIEW.
This is error is indicating that your original CAD model is not checked in and as per your configuration you require the original to be checked in before moving to next status.
Please:
1. Check your document status network.
2. ensure that you have proper set up for the fields "check in" in the current status. This indicator should be set. This ensures that the document is automatically checked in before moving to the next status. This will solve your problem.
When I double click on that object in CAD VIEW, it takes me to DIR creation screen with Document Type DES. Can someone help me in this ?
Because of the above set up missing the original DIR is missing the original document and hence the system assumes you are creating a new DIR when you click on the object in CAD view.
regards,
N K

New revision for a metadata only content

Hi all,
I'm using Webcenter Content (UCM) 11.1.1.6 and client is using a kind of documents without file associated. It's working fine with the AllowPrimaryMetaFile=true and createPrimaryMetaFile=1 variables, but client needs to have revisions of this content. We can't just update the content because they want to have a new revision for every change.
The checkout option is enabled but, when we try to create the new version, the metadata-only checkbox is missing and form asks for primary file.
Could you help me?
Thanks in advance.

I was able to replicate your issue. If I am right, the caveat is not in the fact that CHECKIN_SEL_FORM does not understand the rule, but rather that no rule is used at all (it defaults to the standard check-in).
What have I done?
- I have created a simple rule where all the three keys were filled with values as advised.
- The rule contained just the mandatory fields (security group, document type document title).
- Then, I have created a profile consisting of this rule only (defined as Excluded non-rule fields). Note that in my system Profile Trigger Field uses a custom field called xProfile, which contains values from a table, so I had to add another record to that table ("HidePrimary").
- Now, with this setup, if you check in a new item using the profile, the Primary File is hidden, but when you check out the item and try to check in a new revision (CHECKIN_SEL_FORM) it appears - no profile, but standard check in form is used.
- Therefore, I have modified the rule to contain also xProfile field (InfoOnly) and I filled it with the default value "HidePrimary". This will force the system to use the HidePrimary profile even when a new revision is being checked in.
- Finally, I verified that it really works.

Issue with DEBMAS IDoc,not all fields are reflected in the IDoc Seg E1KNB1M

For IDoc type DEBMAS, there is a segment E1KNB1M. This segment is relate to the customer correspondence details (XD02 -> company code data -> Correspondence).
For any change to the customer master a DEBMAS IDoc is triggered which has data in segments including the E1KNB1M.
In my case for few customers, the not all fields in the segment E1KNB1M contain data. Few fields contain data but the rest are filled with u2018\u2019. This is happening only in the production system, for the same customer in the quality system the data is there as required.
I checked in debugging, and found that the data is correctly passed to the segment in program SAPLVV01 Include LVV01F01. And the segment contains data till the IDoc is triggered. I.e. the fields are not getting cleared at any point.
Can anyone suggest what is happening and how to fix this? Please note that the issue is only in the production system and not in the quality system ( for the same customer).

BTT... Need some help on the above

Not All Fields are Displayed in RSA3 for a Generic Extractor ??

Hi all,
 I have a created a Generic Extarctor based on a View and enhanced the Extract Structure with 3 ZZ Fields. Now it has 26 fields with width of 273. In RSA3, I could see inly 12 fields with width of 147 only.
 No field has checked as HIDE in DataSource.
 I have checked Settings --> Layout --> Current, there are NO columns in Hidden Fields box which is on right side. All fields are there in left side box under Line 1.
 I could see all the fields in ROOSFIELD table for this DataSource.
When I copy it into Spreadsheet from RSA3, I could see all the fields with data including ZZ fields (Appended Fields).
 What is the problem and how could I fix it, PLEASE ?
 Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Venkat,
Message was edited by:
 Venkat Kodi

Hi Venkat
sorry for late response.
Anyway did you solve your issue.
Forget about the icon now and check again in ROOSFIELD table and check if the missing field for selection has any parameter value. If so (shoudl be a P value ) then maintain it and put a blank value save the changes.
this should solve your issue.
hope this could help you
regards
Boujema

Metadata Only checkin HTML creation - all fields???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for