Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 and iCal

So at my new job they use Exchange Server 2007 for mail and calendars, and supposedly I should be able to view other people's calendars, but I can't find any way to do this in iCal.
Do I have to install Entourage, or is there some other way to do this?

Hello,
I finally found the response : Grid control 11g cannot monitor Exchange Server 2007 or 2010 because they don't support WMI. The plugin uses WMI to connect to Exchange Server.
Oracle have to create a new plugin based on PowerShell.
Thanks Dominik.
Edited by: Dominik on 19 nov. 2010 07:14

Similar Messages

Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 and Windows 8 Compatibility

Is there a fix or workaround for accessing email via Outlook 2013 (Windows 8) when your company uses Microsoft exchange server 2003 and has not plans on upgrading it any time soon. I am a remote employee so I am the only one that has this problem in the
company. I can access email through an owa account but it's a pain. I tried to set up a rule to have all incoming mail forwarded to my gmail account in Outlook 2013, but that did not work. Any other ideas?

If server has enabled ActiveSync you can use Windows 8 Mail Client - works almost like Outlook.
AFAIR Outlook 2013 can't work with Exchange 2003.
Regards, Konrad Sagala, MCT, MCSE+M, MCITP: Exchange 2007/2010, Lync 2010, Office365, Windows 2008, Virtualization

Oracle HRMS Integration with Microsoft Exchange Server 2007

I would like to know if it is possible to integrate Oracle HRMS 11.5.10.x with Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 using Microsoft Identity Lifecycle Management (ILM) 2007?
Has anyone ever come across something like this and successfully achieved it? Does anyone know of a step-by-step guide (or forum discussion) to achieve this?
Response(s) will be highly appreciated.

hi,
We actually implemented integration of SAP with microsoft exchange server. It is not necessary for server and IIS to be in the same machine.
regards,
Ganesh.N

Autodiscover Exchange Server 2007 and 2013 Coexistence

Hello
We are having some issues where some users are not being notified when their mailbox is being migrated to E2013.
Before 2013, we never had a load balanced solution for CAS in Exchange Server 2007 or a single name space.
Below is our current config
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2K7CASpd
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://legacy.domain.int/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {USChicago, UKLondon, SGSingapore}
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2k7CASdr
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://legacy.domain.int/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {USChicago, UKLondon, SGSingapore}
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2013CASPD01
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {UKLondon}
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2013CASPD02
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {UKLondon}
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2013CASDR02
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {UKLondon}
AutoDiscoverServiceCN : Server2013CASDR01
AutoDiscoverServiceClassName : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
AutoDiscoverServiceGuid : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
AutoDiscoverSiteScope : {UKLondon}
I believe that we should change the AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri on the two 2007 CAS to ALSO be the same as our 2013 CAS.
We know that when Outlook is opened, Autodiscover will respond with any of the 6 available CAS, and we think that those Outlook clients that are misconfigured, are those that are not getting notified when their Mailbox is moved to E2013.
Thanks

We are also getting inconsistent results using the Test-OutlookWebServices PS
Test 1
Test-OutlookWebServices -Identity [email protected] | fl
Id : 1003
Type : Information
Message : About to test AutoDiscover with the e-mail address [email protected].
Id : 1006
Type : Information
Message : The Autodiscover service was contacted at https://legacy.domain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml.
Id : 1016
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://ServerCASpd05.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
time was 76 milliseconds.
Id : 1015
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the OAB service at https://ServerCASpd05.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
time was 0 milliseconds.
Id : 1014
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the UM service at https://ServerCASdr05.domain.local/UnifiedMessaging/Service.asmx.
The elapsed time was 558 milliseconds.
Id : 1016
Type : Success
Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://legacy.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed time
was 46 milliseconds.
Id : 1015
Type : Information
Message : [EXPR]-The OAB is not configured for this user.
Id : 1014
Type : Information
Message : [EXPR]-The UM is not configured for this user.
Id : 1013
Type : Error
Message : When contacting https://mail.domain.local/Rpc received the error The remote server returned an error: (404) Not
Found.
Id : 1017
Type : Error
Message : [EXPR]-Error when contacting the RPC/HTTP service at https://mail.domain.local/Rpc. The elapsed time was 93
milliseconds.
Id : 1006
Type : Success
Message : The Autodiscover service was tested successfully.
Id : 1021
Type : Information
Message : The following web services generated errors.
Contacting server in EXPR
Please use the prior output to diagnose and correct the errors.
Test 2
Test-OutlookWebServices -Identity [email protected] | fl
Id : 1003
Type : Information
Message : About to test AutoDiscover with the e-mail address [email protected].
Id : 1006
Type : Information
Message : The Autodiscover service was contacted at https://legacy.Domain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml.
Id : 1016
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://ServerCASpd05.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
time was 46 milliseconds.
Id : 1015
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the OAB service at https://ServerCASpd05.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
time was 0 milliseconds.
Id : 1014
Type : Success
Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the UM service at https://ServerCASdr05.Domain.local/UnifiedMessaging/Service.asmx.
The elapsed time was 15 milliseconds.
Id : 1016
Type : Success
Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://legacy.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed time
was 78 milliseconds.
Id : 1015
Type : Information
Message : [EXPR]-The OAB is not configured for this user.
Id : 1014
Type : Information
Message : [EXPR]-The UM is not configured for this user.
Id : 1017
Type : Success
Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the RPC/HTTP service at https://legacy.Domain.local/Rpc. The elapsed time was 187
milliseconds.
Id : 1006
Type : Success
Message : The Autodiscover service was tested successfully.

Upgrading from SBS 2008 and Exchange Server 2007 and Adding Modest Failover Protection

I haven't seen anyone describe this scenario, so maybe it can't be done, but it seems it should work. Can someone either confirm this is viable or set me straight and tell me it's not wise (and if not, why not).
I currently have SBS 2008 (2008 Server + Exchange Server 2007 + some other components). I use redirected folders so all my user data is stored primarily on the server, and then sync'd with their local harddrives for roaming use and as an additional
backup precaution. I want to upgrade to a modern version of Exchange (don't care too much about the underlying server OS, but seems like a good time to upgrade everything). I also want to improve the reliability for rapid recovery in the event of a system
failure. I have always felt nervous with SBS because it only runs on a single server.
My plan is:
Install Windows Server 2012 Standard on a new server machine
Join that new server to the existing SBS domain and sync the users, etc.
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the new 2012 Server
Migrate the existing Exchange data and account info to the new server
Demote the SBS Server and promote the new server to primary DC
Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC
Set up DFS Replication and keep all my user data folders between the two servers (so if one server fails, the other can take over, just not automatically like with a cluster)
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the reformatted 2012 Server box (so second instance on the domain) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG (so if either computer crashes, the other can take over for both Exchange Server and file
services)
Wouldn't that give me a complete slow-response failover system without the need for setting up a cluster (I know a cluster would provide instant failover protection, but I don't need that kind of speed - a manual switchover in the rare event of a server
failure is acceptable for us)? I could do this using cheap hardware for each server, because unless both servers fail at the same time, clients can point to the other server. And because it's not a formal cluster, I don't need to buy anything for a shared
SAN. This seems like such an obvious more cost-effective solution for a small network, I don't understand why this isn't a common approach, which makes me wonder if there is some reason it won't work.
Any suggestions or feedback? Are Redirected Folders still recommended for users on a Server 2012-based domain?
Thanks,
Colin
Colin

Ed, thanks again for your help. OK, so here's my updated plan (I realize I should probably check on some of these pieces on the Server group, instead of this Exchange group).
Constraints/objectives:
None of the machines are truly server grade hardware, but only 5 people on the network, so performance is generally not an issue, unless a given server is just pegged on CPU or HD due to its own internal maintenance tasks and can't respond to user requests.
Haven't seen any problems, since upgrading server from 4GB RAM to 8GB a few years ago.
Not going to buy any new hardware at this time, but do have several unused consumer-grade computers I can deploy as wimpy or moderate servers.
Main issue is to limit repair time in the event of a system failure (instant failover is not required, but want to be able to restore network functions within less than 24 hours in the event of a hardware failure) and minimize time spent on IT
maintenance.
Because of light IT maintenance (not anyone's primary job and we're too small to justify a dedicated IT person or to pay for outside help), almost every touch takes me research and time to re-learn what I haven't done in weeks, months, or years -- so also
want to keep all IT tasks as simple as possible.
We philosophically want to invest now for the next 5 years and avoid ongoing cloud fees (so zero interest in Windows Server Essentials with Exchange Online)
A little nervous about using VM's, just because I never have before, but I do respect that's probably the right way to do many of these things...
Currently I have SBS 2008 (Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2007, WSUS 3, all with latest SP's, also includes SharePoint and other stuff, but I don't really care about most of it) on a single 8GB consumer grade system, which functions as a file
server and Exchange server. We use Redirected Folders and Offline files for all users, which works great for us and provides additional file redundancy (if server goes down, all of each user's files are also on their own machine and they can even continue
to work just fine w/o the server, losing only ability to send and receive e-mail). It has been sufficient, but I want to upgrade our version of Exchange and I am nervous that if that current one server fails, it would take me a long time to restore everything
from backup, easily many days, especially if I need to buy any replacement hardware. It is RAID1, so a single drive failure is easy to handle, but that's the only hardware redundancy for the current server.
New Plan:
Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a new modest machine (16GBR RAM, Core i7, 1TB RAID1 (may upgrade to 3 or 4 TB), 256 GB SSD boot drive, this had been my old personal computer)
Join that new server to the existing SBS domain (2008 R2/Exchange 2007), make it a DC, sync the users, etc.
Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a wimpy computer (4GB RAM Core i3 processor), leave it as a member server
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the wimpy new 2012 R2 Server (and nothing else, this will be dedicated to Exchange to make the most of such a wimpy machine)
Migrate the existing Exchange data from the old SBS Exchange 2007 server and account info to the new server
(or should I just create new accounts and copy the data from the user end through Outlook -- is that safer and cleaner than attempting any kind of server-level Exchange data migration?)
Demote the old SBS Server and promote the new 16GB server to primary DC. Now it's OK to take the old SBS server off the network.
Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 R2 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC (and possibly DCPROMO it to be the main server)
Install Exchange Server 2013 in a VM on the reformatted 2012 R2 Server box (so second instance on the domain for Exchange redundancy) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG OR set up another physical wimpy member server and install
it there. In any case, do NOT install Exchange directly on either DC.
Set up DFS Replication or a Failover Cluster (still need to research this, but I had planned on DFS, thinking Cluster required shared drive, but Ed corrected me on this) between the two DC's for redirected files and keep all my user data folders between
the two servers. We don't need automatic failover, like with a cluster, a manual switch would be acceptable, but if no additional cost or risk to clustering the two DC's, then the auto-failover protection that provides would be better than DFS.
I think this incorporates all of your points, Ed. Does this sound right now? What's your advice on #5 (how to best migrate user data)?
Thanks so much for all your help,
Colin

Iphone and Microsoft Exchange server 2007.

We as a corporate company have many iphone users, and the iphone users are configured with our corporate microsoft exchange 2007 server. So the users use their iphones to check their corporate emails which is on microsoft exchange 2007. So they have setup a connection on their iphones to the company exchange server.
The issue we have is that the iphone users have issues with sending out email via the exchange email accounts on their iphones, when they send large emails, or emails with a long chains, When they send these emails the emails gets stuck in the outbox, and does not send out. The users then have to delete the content in the email, or make the email less in size and then it sends OK.
We have checked our exchange server and the settings seem ok, and we have contacted microsoft, and they have done some tests with a windows mobile emulator which acts like a mobile device, and there are no issues with sending email their. So they have asked me to contact Apple about any issues.
So has anyone come across this issue. Any suggestions.

Try this:
1. On your Exchange server that runs your active sync or outlook web access, open IIS
2. Right click on the website that contains exchange components and choose properties.
3. Select the "Directory Security" tab
4. Under "Secure Communications", click the "Edit" button
5. Under "Client Certificates", select "Ignore Client Certificates"
6. *IMPORTANT STEP: When you click ok and ok again, it may ask you whether you want to change other subfolders within the main container with the modifications you have just made, dont select any of these subfolders, just click OK. It is only the main properties you need to change. Those that need to inherit, should already inherit properly. If you select other subfolders to change with the modifications you have just made, it will likely ruin your active directory setup as some subfolders need different security settings to others.

Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 and McAfee Email Gateway appliance

I have been connecting to my company's exchange server without incident until the IT department installed a McAfee Email Gateway. Now I cannot connect and the IT department tells me there is nothing they can do. Has anyone encountered this issue?

If server has enabled ActiveSync you can use Windows 8 Mail Client - works almost like Outlook.
AFAIR Outlook 2013 can't work with Exchange 2003.
Regards, Konrad Sagala, MCT, MCSE+M, MCITP: Exchange 2007/2010, Lync 2010, Office365, Windows 2008, Virtualization

Every time I navigate to a new site or page I also get additional new tabs opening which say 'Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 - this page is no longer available', so I soon end up with an extra tab every time I navigate to a new page.

so I am geting an additional unwanted MS Exchange tab/window every time I navigate to a new site or bookmark. i recentlly upgraded to Firefox 5.0 and I think this problem may have started around the same time. I also have MS Outlook but this is stand alone and I do not synch online at all, and have not changed any settings in it.

Try the Firefox SafeMode. <br />
''A troubleshooting mode, which disables most Add-ons.'' <br />
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default Theme.)''
# You can open the Firefox 4/5/6/7 SafeMode by holding the '''Shft''' key when you use the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
# Or use the Help menu item, click on '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' while Firefox is running. <br />
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before using the Firefox shortcut (without the Shft key) to open it again.''
If it is good in the Firefox SafeMode, your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. <br />
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Is there a way to sync Pre-MS Exchange Server 2007 (Service Pack 1) Calendar?

Hello all,
I think my company must be using Pre-Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with Service Pack 1 for our exchange server, because
I can only set up company Exchange account on MS Entourage, not the new Outlook
I can only set up the same exchange account only on iPad and iPhone (able to view in Mail, Calendar, Contacts & Reminders)
But
I am unable to use Lion's Mail, iCal and Address Book to see my Exchange account
For the moment, I am not really concern about mail and addresses,
but can I see my Exchange calendar on my desktop iCal? How do I set it up?
I guess the most obvious and straight forward way, for now, is to view on my iPad :-) But it is really funny that the iDevices are backward compatible but yet Lion OS cannot...
Thanks and cheers.

Hi,
Yes it will work, it says enterprise because it works there as well.
Thanks
Bifocals
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

Hidden Contact Subfolders are visible on iPhone after sync with Exchange Server 2007

Hello,
We have encountered an issue where synchronizing the iPhone with Contacts from an Exchange Server 2007 mailbox, causes hidden contact subfolders (from Outlook) to be visible and appear in the Groups list in the Contacts App on the iPhone. This does not occur with Exchange Server 2010 mailboxes.
We have a 3rd party application that creates hidden subfolders in the default Contacts folder on Exchange Server 2007 mailboxes. The hidden folders do not display in the Outlook client, Blackberry or on an Android phone. We did see that they were showing up in Outlook Web Access until we applied this Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3 Rollup 2 patch unto the Exchange server:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2210042 - A sub contact folder is still visible after you set the "PR_ATTR_HIDDEN" attribute to "True" in an Exchange Server 2007 environment.
After the patch was applied, the hidden contacts do not show up anywhere else. However, when we synced the mailbox to an iPhone and synced existing contacts, all of the hidden folders appear in the Contact Groups list. Is there a way to hide the hidden sub contact folders on the iPhone and prevent them from appearing in the Contact Group lists?
Any help provided would be most appreciated.
Thanks and Best Regards

Hi SBuchan,
I have an open case with Microsoft about it. It is an issue with ActiveSync in Exchange 2007 that sends the hidden objects. Microsoft tried to resolve this in Exchange 2010 by sending a delete message after sending the hidden objects to remove them from the device. Am awaiting to see if they will approve a design change to Exchange 2007 ActiveSync to prevent the synching of hidden objects.

Is there any Collector for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010?

Dears All,
Sentinel currently provide only Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP1,
But our customer exchange version is exchange 2010, Is there any
Collector for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010? Thanks!
steve_zeng
steve_zeng's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=3875
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=46984

steve_zeng;226167 Wrote:
> Dears All,
>
> Sentinel currently provide only Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 SP1,
> But our customer exchange version is exchange 2010, Is there any
> Collector for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010? Thanks!
There's a pre-release build of the exchange collector available for
2010, just contact NTS.
If you need a full formal release, we're looking to have 2010 and 2013
support by approximately mid-year.
brandon.langley
brandon.langley's Profile: https://forums.netiq.com/member.php?userid=350
View this thread: https://forums.netiq.com/showthread.php?t=46984

Email encryption in Exchange Server 2007

Dear Support Team,
Now, current environment is Exchange Server 2007 and Outlook 2007. We have some question.
1. How do I scan external/public domain before email sent out? Should I config in Exchange and Outlook 2007?
2. How do I encrypted email? Do you suggested solution? required 3rd party? Exchange or outlook?
3. Can I encrypted email only email that send to external email?
Thank you.

Hi,
According to the descritpion, I know that you want to make sure the messages that you sent out be safe.
Please refer information below:
Encrypt all outgoing messages
Choosing to encrypt all outgoing messages means, in effect, your e-mail is encrypted by default. You can write and send messages the same as with any other e-mail messages, but all potential recipients must have your digital ID to decode your messages.
On the Tools menu, click Trust Center, and then click
E-mail Security.
Under Encrypted e-mail, select the
Encrypt contents and attachments for outgoing messages check box.
To change additional settings, such as choosing a specific certificate to use, click
Settings.
Click OK twice.
More details to see:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/outlook-help/encrypt-e-mail-messages-HP001230536.aspx#BM2
Please correct me if there is any misunderstanding.
Also find a similar thread for your reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/a0acf5e1-7525-4ce9-b487-a112a881b4ce/sending-encrypted-emails-externally
The RMS is supported in Exchange org. More details to refer:
New Rights-Protected E-Mail Functionality with RMS
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123950(v=exchg.80).aspx
Thanks
Mavis
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

HTML Body is lost from when it is read from Exchange Server 2007 to siebel 7.7.2.12

Hi
An HTML Email body sent through any email client. If the body type is HTML, when it comes through POP3 Exchange server 2007 and Siebel driver reads the mail it looses the Body formatting. I have already tried with the following options
1) Adminstration Communication -> Communication Drivers and Profiles -> Internet SMTP/POP3 Server -> Driver Parameters -> Create Plain Text From HTML to True - This did not help
2) Adminstration Communication -> Communication Drivers and Profiles -> Internet SMTP/POP3 Server -> Driver Parameters -> Convert Incoming To Plain Text to True - This did not help
Both the combination did not help
We also tried changing the POP3 properties at Exchange server level, where any email that is coming will always gets changed to plain text or HTML even that did not help.
Any suggestions or recommendations are highly appreciated.
Thanks
Bhanu

Hi,
I also think it's caused due to the software confliction, to verify this, please perform a clean boot:
Log on to the computer by using an account that has administrator rights.
Click Start, type msconfig.exe in the Start Search box, and then press Enter to start the System Configuration utility.
Note If you are prompted for an administrator password or for confirmation, you should type the password or provide confirmation.
Collapse this imageExpand this image
On the General tab, click the Selective startup
option, and then click to clear the Load startup items check box. (The
Use Original Boot.ini check box is unavailable.)
Collapse this imageExpand this image
On the Services tab, click to select the Hide all Microsoft services check box, and then click
Disable all.
Collapse this imageExpand this image
Note This step lets Microsoft services continue to run. These services include Networking, Plug and Play, Event Logging, Error Reporting, and other services. If you disable these services, you may permanently delete all restore points. Do not
do this if you want to use the System Restore utility together with existing restore points.
Click OK, and then click Restart.
If there's no issue in clean boot, I suggest you double check the settings or the better way to contact the developer of the softwares to do further research on this issue.
Thanks,
Melon Chen
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here

Exchange Server 2007

We are currently running exchange server 2007 and are in the process of moving towards Office 365 for our email needs by the year end.
My question is specifically towards exchange and/or Outlook, but also would be applicable within the office 365 environment. Is there any way to limit the number of email recipients in the to field specifically? IE, if someone is sending an email
to more than X people, then it will alert the user that it cannot be sent, without the same limitation applying to the BCC field?
The use case would be to prevent the accidental sharing of email addressed during mass mailings.

Hi,
Based on my knowledge, Exchange has no built-in function to restrict the recipients only in the TO field. The workaround is to use the cmdlet Sathish provided to restrict the recipients including TO, CC and BCC field. Your understanding will be appreciated.
For your reference:
Set-TransportConfig
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691276%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Using Exchange Server 2007 with 755p ???

After three phone calls to Palm customer service, I still cannot get my 755p to connection to Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 via Versamail. I have tried enumerous combinations without success. One customer service person told me I had to have a "certificate" with Server 2007 (unlike) but she could never tell me how to use it. (I have a line in my regular Outlook account set-up that reads "Only connect to proxy servers that have this principal name in their certificate:" I have that name in Outlook , but see no way of using it in Versamail. Without that certificate, it seems to reject my username and password.)
Any help here from someone who has actually been able to connect using the basic Versamail wizard and Exchange 2007? (I'm using Windows XP, but setting this up in the 755p -- not the computer. My service is Sprint.)
Post relates to: Treo 755p (Sprint)

Click on the following link for the support page for your device on the kb.palm.com webpage.
http://www.palm.com/us/support/treo/treo755psprint/
There are links on the page to the user guide, troubleshooting, how to's, downloads, etc.
Click on the link for "email setup (Versamail)"
There are instructions there for setting up an exchange account.
If you need to install a certificate on the device, click on the following link for instructions on installing a certificate on a Palm OS device.
http://www.palm.com/us/support/downloads/versamail/certmodtool.html
Post relates to: Palm i705

Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 and iCal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for