Microsoft Hotfix KB2775511 for Intel x64 Architecture.

Hello,<o:p></o:p>
We have Windows 2008 R2 SP1 with exchange 2010 SP3 RU8v2. We want to install hotfix KB2775511.
When we search the MS portal I am getting the hotfix  "AMD64-all-windows6.1-kb2775511-v2-x64_ec18cc10e27faf443c17e7a8073c9eba773eb13e.msu".
My server are installed on Intel platform (x64 Architecture). Can we install this hotfix on Intel x64 platform as hotfix shows as AMD64.  With
KB2775511 we
need to install below hotfixes, when we download this hotfixes it shows as AMD64. Please suggest.
AMD64-all-windows6.1-kb2878378-v2-x64_eb7f7ae83a8d77ba88b228e058fc9c152c211e7a.msu
AMD64-all-windows6.1-kb2732673-v4-x64_801bb11beb007464927d0988992005f63899dab2.msu
AMD64-all-windows6.1-kb2728738-v3-x64_22e4457734ff8c995a3637f95ea7848de7956a0d.msu
<o:p> </o:p>
Thanks<o:p></o:p>
Srini<o:p></o:p>

Yes. x64 is x64. There is no difference here as far as AMD and Intel goes. That's just a naming convention Microsoft adopted based upon the AMD being the first to introduce a complete x64 instruction set (or something like that).
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

Similar Messages

  • Need a link to the microsoft hotfix for this error (below)

    error 2203.Database: C:\windows\installer\41d24.ipi. Cannot open database file system error -2147287035

    Hi avanasse,
    Please check the KB : http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-2203-install-creative-suite.html
    For Microsoft hotfix please contact Microsoft

  • ITunes 11.2.2 for Windows x64 will not successfully install.  Removed prior iTunes, and still will not install. 10.7 installs just fine, but constantly asks to upgrade to 11.2.2.  Any Thoughts?

    iTunes 11.2.2 for Windows x64 will not successfully install.  Removed prior iTunes, and still will not install. 10.7 installs just fine, but constantly asks to upgrade to 11.2.2.  Any Thoughts?

    For general advice see Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
    The steps in the second box are a guide to removing everything related to iTunes and then rebuilding it which is often a good starting point unless the symptoms indicate a more specific approach. Review the other boxes and the list of support documents further down page in case one of them applies.
    Your library should be unaffected by these steps but there is backup and recovery advice elsewhere in the user tip.
    The section Install missing components has advice on breaking down the iTunes installer into the individual .msi files which might prove useful if one component won't install normally.
    If needs be, the Microsoft Program Install and Uninstall Utility (MS Installer "Fixit") may be able to help force through the installation.
    tt2

  • So when I installed the most recent updates for microsoft office 2011 for mac, my ical info disappeared.  Still have the info on my Office calendar but it's no longer on ical.  It's also been removed from my phone.  How can I get outlook to sync with ical

    When I installed the recent updates for Microsoft Office 2011 for Mac, my iCal calendar was wiped out, as was the calendar on my iPhone.  I'd rather use iCal than Office and was attempting to phase Office out altogether.  Now, all of my information is on the Office calendar but not iCal.  The iCloud version of my iCal calendar is not up to date.  In any event, I couldn't figure out how to send that info to the iCal on my mac or my phone.  How can I sync my Office calendar info to iCal?  If that's not possible, how can I get my Office calendar to sync with my iPhone?  All of my sync services are set up in iTunes and on my phone.  This happened to me once before and I spent hours on the phone with Apple and on the web trying to work it out.  I NEED MY CALENDAR!!!! PLEASE HELP!!!!!

    As that's not an Apple product, you may get more help by using Microsoft's Office for Mac forums:
    Office for Mac forums
    The other concern I have is that Office 2011 requires an Intel-based Mac and you posted in the older iMac (pre-Intel or "PPC") forums. If you have an Intel-based iMac (Apple menu > About this Mac..." will say "Intel" if you do) then I think you'll get faster and more accurate ansers to other questiosn in the Apple forums for newer iMacs here:
    iMac (Intel)

  • Cannot save any changes - Microsoft Forefront 2010 for exchange is unable to perform the requested function

    HI, I have Forefront 2010 for Exchange installed for an Exchange 2007 SP2 running on Windows 2003 x64 SP2. Exchange has all roles installed on the same server. 
    When I try to save any change on Forefront I got the following message:
    Microsoft Forefront 2010 for Exchange is unable to perform the requested function. This may be because Forefront services are unavailable. Ensure that all Microsoft Forefront services are running and that WindowsPower Shell is functional
    Well, our FF services are running and PowerShell is functional. I checked some forums and found some problems when there is entries in the IP Allow / Block lists in Exchange UI. I removed those entries but problem remains.
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Xavier Villafuerte

    In my case, I was able to work around this issue by using  PowerShell directly.  For example, to run an on-demand scan for all mailboxes, this worked:
    #open EMS
    $aliases = (get-mailbox -result unlimited).alias
    Add-PsSnapin FSSPSSnapin
    set-FseOnDemandScan -MailboxList $aliases
    Start-FseOnDemandScan -EnableVirusScan $true
    Windows 2008 R2 SP1
    Exchange 2010 SP3, RU9
    PowerShell 4.0 present on the machine (though EMS runs PS 2.0)
    Forefront PowerShell cmdlets:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc482986.aspx
    Mike Crowley | MVP
    My Blog --
    Baseline Technologies

  • J2SE 1.4.2 for Windows x64 bit download link

    Dear All,
    Can any one give me the link to download J2SE 1.4.2 for Windows x64 bit architecture?
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Syed

    There should be no issues with using SAP JVM from the start.
    Probably no notes because is straightforward:
    - Extract the SAP JVM (e.g. c:\sapjvm_4)
    - Set JAVA_HOME (c:\sapjvm_4)
    And start installation as per guide.
    We have done this recently with Solman 7 EHP1 and NW 7 EHP1 (J2EE stack).
    We did have issue on central instance install where the J2EE instance would not start part way through installation (server0 continually crashed and restarted with memory issues) so we had to adjust the instance settings as per SAP Note#1603093, before retrying in SAPINST and continuing.
    We had this problem with both Solman & NW 7 EHP1.

  • I need updated drivers for Intel HD Graphics 4000

    Hi,
    this is the laptop:
    SATELLITE L50-A-170
    PSKJNE-03L00MIT
    Microsoft Windows 8.1  6.3.9600 (64bit)
    I need the last drivers for Intel HD Graphics 4000, 64-bit version 15.33.32.64.4061 (10.18.10.4061).
    I downloaded the driver but I can't install because:
    "The driver being installed is not valid for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacturer Setup will exit"
    ...but in your support page the last version is 10.18.10.3308.
    What can I do?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    dati laptop.txt ‏10 KB

    Try this workaround.
       How to Manually Install a Driver in Microsoft Windows 8* or Windows 8.1*
    -Jerry

  • Enterprise Hotfix Rollup for Win7 and Server 2008 R2 via WSUS

    I stumbled across the fact that Microsoft released a hotfix rollup for Win7 and Server 2008 R2 that contains 90 hotfixes
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2775511/en-us
    The articled I linked above talks about after installing 2775511 (the big hotfix rollup containing 90 hotfixes) it is also necessary to install three more hotfixes:
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2732673 to fix a regression issue in the Rdbss.sys file
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2728738 to fix a regression issue in the Profsvc.dll file
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2878378 re-released on November 11, 2013 to fix a regression issue in the Advapi32.dll file
    I have imported all four of these hotfixes into my WSUS server. Do I need to install 277551 first and then install the other three or can all four be approved and go out at once? I guess I am hung up on the language of "After this update is installed
    .... ". I want to put all 4 of these on our Win7 machines as well as my 40+ WinServer 2008 R2 machines

    I read somewhere that over half of the updates included in Win7 SP1 and WinServer 2008 R2 SP1 were originally released as hotfixes. This means Microsoft made the decision that a large number of hotfixes would benefit every user of these two OSs
    I think your conclusion is flawed. The only thing that you can draw from the presented statistic, is that Microsoft determined that a significant percentage of updates originally released as hotfixes warranted the additional investment in regression testing
    to subsequently release those hotfixes as updates.
    The fact that they bundled these 90 hotfixes together leads me to the same conclusion.
    In fact, exactly the opposite conclusion applies: What you have in this package is all the rest of the stuff that didn't make that cut. What you have in this package are still NOT-regression tested hotfixes, they've just been bundled up for easy deployment
    (and note that three of them got further broken in the process of bundling), causing yet three more hotfixes to have to be released.
    In fact I read the MS Team Blog about this big hotfix release and they say the same thing, all users of these OSs would benefit from the installation of this hotfix rollup, not just a subset of users.
    I suspect there are a notable number of patch administrators and systems administrators who would disagree with that self-serving promotion. If, in fact, it's true that "all users" would benefit, then the product team should have invested the effort in properly
    regression testing those hotfixes, and releasing them as REAL updates. They did not; ergo the *actual* value is less than claimed.
    Of course the bugaboo here is the fact that three other individual hotfixes need to be installed after the big hotfix rollup is installed.
    Exactly! (And those are just the attempted fixes that broke something. Who knows how many other "fixes" may still result in newly discovered "broken stuff" that was never broken in the first place.)
    The second part of this question should revolve around an itemized review of the hotfixes contained in this rollup with one simple question asked for each:
    Have we actually *experienced* the issue addressed by this hotfix.
    Where hotfixes are concerned one very simple but important rule applies:
    If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it!
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    SolarWinds Head Geek
    Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
    http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
    The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

  • Calendar client for Intel Mac?

    I've migrated to an Intel Mac recently and while using Oracle Calendar (10.1.2) desktop client I noticed that the Mac OS X version is unfortunately for the PowerPC architecture.
    Is there a native Intel or universal binary build available? If not, is there a schedule for creating such a build?
    marko

    I'm still waiting for Oracle to ship a version of the Calendar Sync for PalmOS for the Intel Mac. At least the Oracle Calendar Desktop runs under Rosetta, the Calendar Sync for PalmOS crashes on installation.

  • Missing OS for Intel Chipset in driver Matrices of nearly all ThinkPads

    Missing OS for Intel Chipset in driver Matrices of nearly all ThinkPads:
    Windows Vista, 7 and 8 are not mentioned in the 2nd column
    Example:
    R400
    T410s
    R60
    Intel Chipset Support for Windows 8 (32-bit, 64-bit), 7 (32-bit, 64-bit), Vista (32-bit, 64-bit), XP (32-bit, 64-bit) - ThinkPad ... Learn more
    Version
    : 9.3.0.1021
    Intel Chipset Support (WW)   
    Read me
    Windows XP 32bit
    Windows XP x64
    19 Oct 2012
    My home-forum: http://www.thinkpad-forum.de
    Wiki: Deutsches ThinkPad-Wiki English ThinkWiki
    My ThinkPad-Collection
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Mornsgrans,
    We will look into this, you are right, the 2nd column and the OS information in the driver page itself doesn't match.
    We will fix it and let you know once this is done.
    Thank you for your patience.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    stormycloud

  • JDK 1.4.2 for Intel Xeon 64 bit

    Gurus,
    I am installing ECC 6.0 on Windows.
    I am unable to download the JDK 1.4.2* for Intel xeon processors on 64 bit running Windows Server x64 standard edition.
    Been to the site  http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/SAPsite/download.html, to download JDK, but unable to logon because of some authentication issues.  Is there a different location or JDK version that can be used for installation.
    Regards
    Abdul

    Hi,
    I have the same problem, I must install J2SE on a brand new server with Intel XEON L5520 CPUs.
    It's NOT possible to install the current J2SE version from  http://www.sun.com/software/javaforbusiness/sap_download.jsp,
    because it's for AMDx64.
    But under  http://java.sun.com/products/archive  you can find an older version "j2sdk-1_4_2_19-windows-i586-p",
    it is possible to install this version ( you must register to download ).
    I find no other way at the moment.
    With regards,
    Michael

  • Hotfix availabe for Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange

    Hi,
    there is a new hotfix available for FPE 2010 which can be downloaded here:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2927022/en-us
    This hotfix requires rollup 4 to be installed for FPE 2010. It can be downloaded here:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2619883/en-us
    Greetings
    Christian
    Christian Groebner MVP Forefront

    Hi Christian, do you know if the install requires a reboot or if any Exchange services are restarted as a result of the install?  Just trying to figure out when to apply the hotfix and if I need to take a maintenance outage.  Thanks!

  • Solved: LR6 GPU supported for Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Windows 8.1 64-bit)

    HD Graphics 4000 is supported with latest Intel driver as shown by LR CC (2015) System Info report (text at bottom). Note an older driver (supplied by the laptop vendor) failed the GPU check.
    Chrome browser users: The URL "chrome://gpu" can be used to quickly access detailed driver and monitor information (other information listed is specific to Chrome).
    Is GPU acceleration supported for Intel 4000 with the latest driver? LR6 GPU FAQ requirements below. However, new Intel 4000 driver (Version: 15.33.35.64.4176) incorporates support for DirectX 11.0 (which dates from Windows Vista (see below)), OpenGL 4.0, & OpenCL 1.2 (see Intel® Download Center).
    Note: Intel HD Graphics 4400 supports DirectX 11.2 (may exclude some optional features), OpenGL 4.3, and OpenCL 1.2
    extracted from Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Help | Lightroom GPU FAQ
    Minimum System Requirements
    64-bit OS versions only
    OpenGL 3.3 and later
    Mac OS 10.9 and later
    Windows 7 and later
    Note: Intel 4400 or later required
    Note: GPU acceleration is disabled on Mac OS 10.8
    Note: GPUs running under virtual machines are not tested or supported.
    Intel Information Center
    Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
    Report Date: Thursday, April 23, 2015
    Report Time [hh:mm:ss]: 1:28:22 PM
    Driver Version: 10.18.10.4176
    Operating System: Windows* 8.1 (6.3.9600)
    Default Language: English (Canada)
    Installed DirectX* Version: 11.2  <= operating system’s DirectX version
    Supported DirectX* Version: 11.0 <= Graphics Driver’s DirectX version
    Shader Version: 5.0
    OpenGL* Version: 4.0
    OpenCL* Version: 1.2
    Physical Memory: 8077 MB
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3337U CPU @ 1.80GHz
    Processor Speed: 1796 MHz
    Vendor ID: 8086
    Device ID: 0166
    Device Revision: 09
    DirectX Versions
    (extracted from How to install the latest version of DirectX)
    DirectX 11.2 is included in Windows 8.1.
    Note There is no standalone update package for DirectX 11.2. You can only install this DirectX version through Windows Update in Windows 8.1,
    DirectX 11.1 for Windows 7 SP1
    DirectX 11.0 for Windows Vista SP2
    Extracted from LR CC (2015) System Info
    Lightroom version:  CC 2015 [1014445]
    License: Expired Trial
    Real memory available to Lightroom: 8077.7 MB
    Real memory used by Lightroom: 339.0 MB (4.1%)
    Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 293.4 MB
    Memory cache size: 0.0 MB
    Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 2
    Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2,AVX
    System DPI setting: 115 DPI
    Desktop composition enabled: Yes
    Displays: 1) 1366x768, 2) 1366x768
    Input types: Multitouch: No, Integrated touch: No, Integrated pen: No, External touch: No, External pen: No, Keyboard: No
    Graphics Processor Info:
    Check OpenGL support: Passed
    Vendor: Intel
    Version: 3.3.0 - Build 10.18.10.4176
    Renderer: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
    LanguageVersion: 3.30 - Build 10.18.10.4176
    *** Note *** GPU check fails with older Intel HD Graphics 4000 driver
    Check OpenGL support: Failed
    Vendor: Intel
    Version: 3.3.0 - Build 10.18.10.3308
    Renderer: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
    LanguageVersion: 3.30 - Build 10.18.10.3308

    This one says 64bits: Intel HD Graphics Driver
    Revision : 01
    Software name Intel HD Graphics Driver
    Support models ThinkPad Edge E120
    ThinkPad Edge E320
    ThinkPad L420, L421
    ThinkPad L520
    ThinkPad X121e, X130e
    Operating Systems Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit
    Microsoft Windows Vista 64-bit
    Refer to marketing materials to find out what computer models
    support which Operating Systems.
    Versions 8.15.10.2827 (Package)
    - 8.15.10.2827 (Graphics Driver)
    - 6.14.00.3086 (Display Audio Driver)
    Support devices Intel HD Graphics Device
    Intel Display Audio
    /L40SX/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E/A20p/A22p
    A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T4x0x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/10*X2xx/2*X200T/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
    Comunidad en Español  English Community  Deutsche Community   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Oracle RDBMS for Intel MacOS X

    In reading the other posts about Oracle Instant Client for Intel MacOS X, I see a lot of others are stating that no one is asking for Oracle RDBMS to be supported natively on Mac OS X (Intel).
    For the record, there are many others that are asking for this from Oracle (and have been since Intel of Mac OS X was announced). I too need the Oracle Instant Client, but I really need Oracle RDBMS released as well (10g for Tiger (Intel) or better).
    We have been waiting for Oracle's promise a few years ago to treat the Mac as First Class Enterprise platform. We invested in this and have been shipping our "single box" solution. However our customers are held back by only able to run Oracle 10g on Panther Server since our product must be run in a certified environment.
    Oracle on Mac OS X for us has been very stable and has served our development and customers well. However, it is just not able to run "certified" on the newer hardware architecture (Intel) and a machine replacement cycle is overdue because of this.
    I hope that Oracle visits this issue soon and has an announcement coincident with the launch of Leopard (UNIX 03).
    I realize some of you have different needs and run the RDBMS on another platform, but not us. So please count a vote for me for both an Oracle Instant Client AND Oracle RDBMS for Mac OS X (Intel).

    In reading the other posts about Oracle Instant
    Client for Intel MacOS X, I see a lot of others are
    stating that no one is asking for Oracle RDBMS to be
    supported natively on Mac OS X (Intel).Yeah, well, those are the same people who seem to think that all it takes to release a new version of the client is switching a compiler flag, waiting 15 minutes for a build, and dumping the result onto the OTN download site. Hyperbole trumps reality. In other words, it's an Internet forum. ;-)
    I'm sure you've already done this, but you're much, much better off getting on the phone with your Oracle rep and detailing to him/her just how much licensing revenue they realistically stand to lose if they don't give some attention to the Intel Mac platform. I could believe that the recent tone of discourse on this forum about "Oracle on OS X/Intel" might actually erode the position that it's a useful product direction for Oracle, so anything that license-paying folk can do to convince them otherwise would be great. :-)
    Otherwise, it's just the same 5 people posting semi-anonymously making vague threats about moving to some other platform and/or venting their spleens about horrible they think Oracle is (which, I know is often a huge motivator for anyone to take on a project...)
    Regards,
    John P.

  • Where is the download link for SCEP Client Offline installer for x86 & x64 altest greatest version (4.6.305 as of today)

    Where is the download link for SCEP Client Offline installer for x86 & x64 latest greatest version (4.6.305 as of today)?
    The answer IS NOT IT AND NEVER WILL BE "DOES NOT EXIST"!!!!!! MUST NEVER NEED TO RUN UPDATES TO GET IT!!!!!!!!! THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE ANSWER IS THE LINK!!!!! DUH GET YOUR ACT IN GEAR MS!!!!!!!!!!
    Ralph

    Thanks to all for the information. I work in higher ed. We have SCCM latest version, fully licensed. Unfortunately the individual who manages the SC does not have a clue as to where to find the SCEP installer. I sent him links from MS that shows him where
    it is supposed to be. The version he say's is on our SC Management server is 4.3. I, in the past, was able to get 4.5 independent of him and it has been working well for me but it is time to use the latest greatest version instead. I should just as easily
    be able to get 4.6. As far as licensing goes, if the product was correctly designed it should just work itself out just like it does for the 4.5 version I was able to easily find and download.
    As for the link given by KevinMJohnston, thanks by the way, its the closest I have come to getting what I need but all I get is a spinning wheel in Firefox, the only browser one should ever need. In IE I get prompted for an email address, which it should
    NEVER EVER DO!!!!!!!!!! I did give them my address, but alas, after waiting over 30 mins. I still don't have a link to the update or the CU4 Config MGR update mentioned. (Another reason I am not very nice to MS, along with, see below...) Please send me the
    link that they are suppose to send me in the email.
    As for the intensity of the request it comes from not being able to find the update on my own. (Amongst a million other complaints as MS makes my job harder and harder, just think of all the lost productivity and extra repair efforts needed because MS stopped
    allowing you to do upgrade/repair installs from the install discs. You have to have a working OS to do it, or you will lose your settings etc and will have to re-install all of your software etc. How STUPID IS THAT! Can't use it to fix a blown driver or BSOD
    problem like you could in XP.  There is no excuse for that, I know better. So you can see why I have nothing good to say about MS etc etc.) There is no excuse for that! If the MS updater has it available then IT MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR STANDALONE DOWNLOAD
    PERIOD. That goes for ALL updates PERIOD.  I use these updates and many others etc so that once I seal an image for a PC it has the latest greatest version of everything. It is quicker to get it stand alone in advance and installing than waiting for MS
    updates to do so. Also I prefer to config my images so that the Av installs after first boot. These are cloned PCs. Many of these PC are used in labs and are frozen. Here, the settings for the SCEP AV being pushed from above can cause major problems for the
    users i.e. the scheduled scan feature. If it is on when students are taking tests and they take more than 5 or 10 mins on question MS is stupid enough to start scanning causing the system to become unresponsive. This has caused students to breakdown in tears
    thinking the system is hosed and they just lost their tests. I have to do some creative reg hack, setting owner as "Guest", a disabled account, etc. to keep these settings from being changed. (Our SC managers push policies that work for the faculty
    but break the lab systems which are frozen, so I have to out hack them, should not be, but it is, we are trying to get that fixed, but bureaucracy and people afraid to share power etc makes it hard.)  These settings unfortunately will prevent the AV from
    installing so I need to be able to manually do it after I have set the reg to allow it.  And I could go on. Who knows when or why someone may need to do a manual update of something. I just had 3 systems fail 12 updates, yet when I manually downloaded
    them and installed them they ALL installed without failure. I did NOTHING in between the auto update and the manual, yet it was the manual way that worked. Maybe if MS could fix those kind of issues then no one would need to get stand alone update files.)
    That is not for MS to worry about. It is, however, their responsibility to make it so that I can choose what will work best for my environment, which only I could know. DUH. I have had issues in the past with MS AV and other brands being installed before "sealing"
    the images. etc. etc. etc.
    As you can see, there is not enough space on the world wide web to list all thousands of legitimate reasons to give Microsoft a hard time so I will do so on a case by case bases knowing I am probably spitting in to the wind, but hey somebody has to have
    the guts to do it. MS MUST NEVER BE ALLOWED TO SIMPLY GET AWAY WITH IT! They Must be called to the proverbial carpet.
    Maybe if people who are MVPs would not be afraid to join the choruses they would be embarrassed, (though it should be done out of moral obligation not embarrassment), enough to fix these obviously fixable problems etc. etc. etc. I have over 30 years in the
    IT business, the IBM XT did not exist until my senior year in college. You are not going to be able to convince me that there is a legitimate reason, copy protection IS NOT IT, to prevent me from fixing blown OS via re-install using install disc when OS will
    not boot. Nor are you going to be able to find legitimate reason for the SCEP 4.6.305 update to be so hard to get.
    Thanks again for the help, still waiting for email from MS, NOT COOL MS! NO EXCUSE!!!!!
    Ralph

Maybe you are looking for