Microsoft  Patch Issue

Pl take a look at the Microsoft Patch issue.since we are
using flash in a big way.This has an impact on several applications
we support. We noticed the problem because we are using
non-applicable machines that already have the new patch applied.Any
application that has an ActiveX control loaded using an
<object>, <applet> or <embed> tag within a page
will be affected. Suggest me......

>
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/download/detection_kit/
> Or use SWFObject which is quite popular, and a bit
easier to implement:
>
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/
For something truly easy to implement (the SWFObject
certainly isn't unless
you're doing a new page from scratch)
http://activecontent.blogspot.com
This has the best solutions for existing HTML files in
particular, as wellas
links to al lthe other solutions.
Jeckyl

Similar Messages

  • September 14 2010 Microsoft patch issue

    Hello all,
     I am about at the end of my rope on this one, I have a variety of HP printers at my office and I print to them via their static IP addresses. The patch that Microsoft put down on September 14, 2010 had a adverse affect to the printing to any PC's that were updated. The PC's can ping the address fine with no issues, but when you try to print their is always a error in printing. The PC's that were not updated do not have this problem. All of the PC's in question are running Windows XP, I did have a Vista machine running with it also but I was able to resolve the problem on that machine and the Windows 7 machines do not seem affected with the issue.
    I am running out of ideas on how to resolve this issue, I have deleted the ports and drivers and reinstalled them. I have uninstalled the patches and also have done system restores to earlier dates in history. I have shutdown the firewalls on the machines and I have updated all the machines with the latest drivers from HP's website. But still when I try to print a test page nothing happens and it errors out. I took a machine out of storage with a clean install of Windows XP and updated it with all the patches and had no problem with adding the printers on the machine. I really don't want to reinstall all of the XP machines to correct the problem though. I did have on PC that was running with a laserjet 1160 connected via a USB port that had no IP printers setup on the system that I was able to update with the patch and easily install a laserjet M3035xs with no problems.
    Also with this new patch the "Network Folders" feature of the Laserjet M3035xs cannot connect to any of the machines that were patched. So this machine that I just bought last week for the accounting office is pretty much worthless till I can find a way to resolve the issue.
    Any and all ideas would be welcomed at the moment.
    Thank you in advance for your suggestions in this.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    If you use mcafee total protection service, this may help.  I had this problem involving windows xp, hp printers and mcafee total protection service.  printer showed ready, could be pinged, right drivers, etc.  To resolve, I launched mcafee console, selected view application list from the drop down and for some reason, spooling was being blocked by the firewall.  Once I changed it to "allow" subsequent print jobs printed just fine.  Good luck.

  • SRM catalog navigation fails after Microsoft patch KB2416400

    After applying Microsoft patch KB2416400, displaying catalogs is failing in IE7 and IE8. Getting the "Navigation to the webpage was canceled"... If you uninstall the patch, it will fix the issue in IE7. I have already reviewed the settings found in OSSN 1511147, which has not solved the issue when the patch is applied. Has anyone else applied this IE security patch and experienced similar results? We are on SRM7.0, SP05 - EP and catalogs both using https. Thanks.

    Hi Kris,
    we found a solution. Please look in SAP Note 1456162.
    The note was written for IE 8, but it looks that the MS patch KB2416400 provides the same security measure also for IE 7.
    IE7 does not allow the dynamic rendering of html by the outbound handler after the patch.
    Cheers,
    Jan

  • Missing microsoft patches

    Looks like since may 8 microsoft patches are not showing correctly in zcc as patched or unpatched, all workstations show zeros for both counts. Other products, adobe, apple etc have released patches since may 8 and patched/unpatched stats are populating in PM. If I look in the debug.log file for a patch released on may 14 (ex KB2829361) the entry is found for MS13-046 KB2829361.pls. The servers are version 11.1a, managed devices range from 10.2.2 up to 11.1a and all have this issue with Microsoft patches. Anyone else seen this behavior ?

    dtemple-sgi wrote:
    >
    > Ended up deleted all the .pls files from
    > /opt/novell/zenworks/zpm/signatures/windows, deleted the DAU bundles
    > and kicked off a new patch subscription update. Seems to have fixed
    > the issue.
    Yes, sometimes this happends - looks like it thinks the patch is there
    but it's not. Easy workaround though...
    Niels
    A true red devil...

  • Getting syntax error in "SAPLBBP_PDH_CUF" in shopping cart/RFx/PO creation process in SRM7.0.Is it Patch issue?

    Getting syntax error in "SAPLBBP_PDH_CUF" in shopping cart/RFx/PO creation process in SRM7.0.Is it Patch issue?

    Hi, something wrong with your customer fields...
    Please, check them...

  • Microsoft patches for Office 2007 applications . . . . .

    How do I get the MS Office 2007 extensions (.docx, etc) to open and be readable without going to textedit? I have downloaded the Microsoft patches, but apparently they are not being placed in the correct file to automate the process. Can anyone help. Thanks. jn

    This forum is for troubleshooting Apple Software Update for Windows, a software package for Windows designed to update Apple products that run on Windows, and not related to Microsoft Office. Please post Office related questions on Microsoft's own forums for their Mac products.
    http://www.officeformac.com/productforums

  • Problem accessing JCOM with Microsoft patch 'Windows2000-KB835732-x86-ENU'

    We have developed an application that uses Weblogic 6.1 and JCOM. This application developed in VC++ uses JCOM's zero client approach to access EJBs deployed on Weblogic. It was working fine.
    But, after installing Microsoft patch 'Windows2000-KB835732-x86-ENU.EXE' on PC, our application is not able to connect to JCOM.
    Can anybody throw some light on what could have been impacted beacuse of this Microsoft patch.

    We are using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 . but it's well with MySQL & JBoss

  • How could I know whether Microsoft patch need reboot or not ?

    We use win2003R2 and win2008R2 and so on in the domain environment.
    When we apply the Microsoft-provided patch, is there any way to know it need OS reboot in advance ? 

    Thank you.
    It is not about specific patch.
    I would like to know how to identify the microsoft-patches need OS reboot or not , perhaps from information from Microsoft web site.

  • Microsoft patches

    We run sun one directory server 5.1 on windows nt.
    we want to install four microsoft patches
    - MS06-051, MS06-040, MS06-032, MS06-041.
    are there any known problems associated with them?

    This forum is for troubleshooting Apple Software Update for Windows, a software package for Windows designed to update Apple products that run on Windows, and not related to Microsoft Office. Please post Office related questions on Microsoft's own forums for their Mac products.
    http://www.officeformac.com/productforums

  • Microsoft patches KB2972207

    Hi,
    Microsoft patches KB2972207 is
     available for Windows server 2003, x64 Edition, SP2??
    or it just support Windows Server 2003 x86 Edition??

    Hi,
    I am getting an error which states ...
    patch
     KB2972207 you are trying to install is for different hardware!
    below i will copy text from error log...as I am not able to attach file!
    [KB2972207.log]
    3.531: ================================================================================
    3.531: 2014/09/16 22:15:24.265 (local)
    3.531: c:\4752d628e7bf009611fecd357e647408\update\update.exe (version 6.3.4.1)
    3.531: Hotfix started with following command line:
    3.531: GetKernelType: GetInternalFilename failed
    3.531: CheckSystem: GetMachineType failed :STATUS_PLATFORM_MISMATCH
    3.531: DoInstallation: CheckSystem Failed: 0xf00e
    3.531: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    11.265: Message displayed to the user: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    11.265: User Input: OK
    11.265: Update.exe extended error code = 0xf00e
    11.265: Update.exe return code was masked to 0x643 for MSI custom action compliance.
    3.828: ================================================================================
    3.844: 2014/09/16 22:40:50.194 (local)
    3.844: c:\7c49c8cc78d756e50bdc808df1\update\update.exe (version 6.3.4.1)
    3.844: Hotfix started with following command line:
    3.844: GetKernelType: GetInternalFilename failed
    3.844: CheckSystem: GetMachineType failed :STATUS_PLATFORM_MISMATCH
    3.844: DoInstallation: CheckSystem Failed: 0xf00e
    3.859: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    15.406: Message displayed to the user: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    15.406: User Input: OK
    15.406: Update.exe extended error code = 0xf00e
    15.406: Update.exe return code was masked to 0x643 for MSI custom action compliance.
    0.343: ================================================================================
    0.343: 2014/09/16 23:51:09.894 (local)
    0.343: c:\57d6053340e37fff6ee518c9a946f78e\update\update.exe (version 6.3.4.1)
    0.343: Hotfix started with following command line:
    0.343: GetKernelType: GetInternalFilename failed
    0.343: CheckSystem: GetMachineType failed :STATUS_PLATFORM_MISMATCH
    0.343: DoInstallation: CheckSystem Failed: 0xf00e
    0.343: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    3.078: Message displayed to the user: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    3.078: User Input: OK
    3.078: Update.exe extended error code = 0xf00e
    3.078: Update.exe return code was masked to 0x643 for MSI custom action compliance.
    4.641: ================================================================================
    4.641: 2014/09/19 04:54:42.083 (local)
    4.641: c:\7961bbab0f562d0058b8\update\update.exe (version 6.3.4.1)
    4.641: Hotfix started with following command line:
    4.641: GetKernelType: GetInternalFilename failed
    4.641: CheckSystem: GetMachineType failed :STATUS_PLATFORM_MISMATCH
    4.641: DoInstallation: CheckSystem Failed: 0xf00e
    4.657: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    14.704: Message displayed to the user: This KB2972207 is for a different hardware platform.
    14.704: User Input: OK
    14.704: Update.exe extended error code = 0xf00e
    14.704: Update.exe return code was masked to 0x643 for MSI custom action compliance.

  • Microsoft Patches for Call Manager

    HELP !!
    Where do I find the "approved" Microsoft patches for CCM4.x please ?
    Regards
    Scott

    Hi Scott,
    You will need a valid CCO account (which I guess you've already got). Then just go to the support section on the Cisco website, choose "download software", then just specify your CCM version etc. and you will see all the patches available.
    Cisco guarantees that they will release any critical operating system patch within 24 hours of the Microsoft announcement. Noncritical patches are rolled up into a monthly update.
    Please rate if useful....

  • Select Data Source and Microsoft Security Issue

    Hi,
    Tool- Xcelsius 2008, QAaWS
    When I open dashboard, it gives message "Microsoft Office has identified a potential security concern" "Data Connection have been blocked. If you choose to enable data connection, your computer may no longer be secure. Do not enable this content unless you trust the source of this file." with <Enable> and <Discable> buttons.
    If it Enabled then leads to "Select Data Source" screen and asks details for DSN.
    At every open it shows same messages.
    Please, help if anyone knows or faced this issue.
    Regards,
    Ashish

    hi,
    this is a really old post.
    please could you specify your exact workflow ?
    what connectors your dashboard is using?
    also, what version and SP and patch are you using for Xcelsius client?
    i.e. Are you up to date with latest compatibility updates?
    regards,
    H

  • Microsoft Patch for OWA 2007 CRES Secure Mail Recipients

    CRES Secure Envelope Recipients attempting to open the CRES Secure Envelope through Microsoft OWA 2007 will need to enable the server side administrative option to disable the HTML/XML filter. Though this HTML filter option will be officially released in the yet-to-be-released Microsoft Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 8, Microsoft customers can request an interim patch from Microsoft. How and when to contact Microsoft Customer Service and Support: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/295539

    I had this same issue, except I have Symantec mail security not Forefront. It wound up being a line in the adult content filter. For whatever reason, they included "If you received this email" as one of the literal strings. This is probably part
    of almost every corporate confidentiality clause I have ever seen!! go figure......
    Thanks for the event log hint- since I have the adult content set to delete, I had no good tracking mechanism in Exhange or SMSME. I set email notifications for the future on these.
    Brent
    I had this same problem, but I have ESET Mail Security Server. in some one case the problem y solved if I attach the "user@domain" in the "white
    List". But in many case the problem is continuous. I have Exchange 2007 in MS Windows Server 2003.
    Thanks for yours help.

  • Outlook 2013 displaying "Upgrade in Progress" problem. Possible Patching issue?

    Some of our Outlook 2013 clients have been displaying "upgrade in progress" It was doing this for hours.  I could no longer get new mails while this was happening.  It all started after we had patches installed.  Since we are using
    this new system for patch installation I think it could have been a patch that would have caused this.  It could be any number of factors but the new patch management system we have could have installed a patch we normally do not have.
    Some factors to consider:
    1.) I had Outlook 2010 on my computer as well.  I uninstalled this and it did not fix.
    2.) Was running Outlook 2013 for months with no issue.
    3.) We use Office 365 for our corporate email.
    4.) Altiris (Symantec Management Console) is being used to patch our machines and it started after patches were installed.
    Control Panel > Program and Features > Microsoft Office > Change > Online Repair. fixed the problem.
    I was hoping someone maybe to help explain how this could have happened.
    Since the computers having this problem are in our test environment and we have not yet deployed Altiris patching solution for the rest of the company yet is a relief but we would like to know if anyone else may have had a problem with this after a certain
    patch that maybe they can identify.
    Thank you!
      

    Hi,
    Did the patches you installed include some update for other version of Office?
    Last time I see this issue is when two versions of Outlook (Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013) are installed on one computer. Please check if the clients with this problem are installed two versions of Outlook. Although we can have two versions of
    Outlook on the same machine, only one version of Outlook can run at a time. Moreover, when we install Outlook 2013 first and then Outlook 2010, it may cause some unwanted issues. The method to fix such issue is to repair Office 2013.
    So I guess there are some updates for Outlook 2010 in the patches which caused the conflict of two versions of Outlook.
    Flynn

  • SQL2012 SP2 CU1 Availability Group database not synchronizing after applying February Microsoft patches

    Hi,
    We are starting our monthly patching and have a situation with SQL2012 SP2 CU1 Availability Groups databases not synchronizing after patching the secondary replica. This seems a little like
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/3033492/en-us which was for CU3 and CU4 builds. The dashboard on the Primary shows the secondary as not synchronizing. The errorlogs on both nodes show the connection
    has recovered but the dashboard shows critical errors. This is running on Windows 2012.
    Thanks
    Chris

    Lydia,
    I am referring to MS15-009 to MS15-017 that came out on Tuesday. These are the only patches we have applied. On our two node Availability Group setup we had the patches applied to the secondary node and then it was restarted. It came up fine and SQL is running
    as expected.
    This is from the primary node errorlog:-
    AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with secondary database terminated for primary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {e6468c4d-9431-4052-88c0-07d3b3eb428c}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    A connection for availability group 'YYYYY50_AG' from availability replica 'YYYYY50AV' with id  [0E53235A-0FBB-4E18-8C40-A0D72F30C36A] to 'YYYYY50BV' with id [E6468C4D-9431-4052-88C0-07D3B3EB428C] has been successfully established.  This is an
    informational message only. No user action is required.
    AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with secondary database established for primary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {e6468c4d-9431-4052-88c0-07d3b3eb428c}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    On the secondary node errorlog:-
    Skipping the default startup of database 'XXX_DEVL' because the database belongs to an availability group (Group ID:  65541). The database will be started by the availability group. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    The state of the local availability replica in availability group 'YYYYY50_AG' has changed from 'RESOLVING_NORMAL' to 'SECONDARY_NORMAL'. The replica state changed because of either a startup, a failover, a communication issue, or a cluster error. For more
    information, see the availability group dashboard, SQL Server error log, Windows Server Failover Cluster management console or Windows Server Failover Cluster log.
    AlwaysOn Availability Groups data movement for database 'XXX_DEVL' has been suspended for the following reason: "system" (Source ID 5; Source string: 'SUSPEND_FROM_RESTART'). To resume data movement on the database, you will need to resume the
    database manually. For information about how to resume an availability database, see SQL Server Books Online.
    Nonqualified transactions are being rolled back in database XXX_DEVL for an AlwaysOn Availability Groups state change. Estimated rollback completion: 100%. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with primary database terminated for secondary database 'XXX_DEVL' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {0e53235a-0fbb-4e18-8c40-a0d72f30c36a}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
    Now I see the suspend message. Running the select on sys.dm_exec_requests there are NO DB_STARTUP ones on either node or blocking.
    Next action is probably to have the patches removed from the secondary node and see if all is well and then try patch one by one to see which one causes the issue.
    Chris

Maybe you are looking for