Microsoft SQL 2k5 / full text indexing

I'm pretty sure I know the answer to this but would like to get some confirmation. I have Stellent 7.5.1; Microsoft SQL 2k5 server and Verity. Should full text indexing be checked or unchecked in Sql?
Thanks

The following thread is on the topic of SQL Azure full text indexing not being available:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsazure/en-US/aefcea67-4c9b-4dff-b480-925a32431bcc/sql-azure-fulltext-indexes?forum=ssdsgetstarted
Workaround solution:
How to Use Lucene.NET with Windows Azure SQL Database
QUOTE: "Summary
Lucene.NET is a .NET implementation of the Lucene full-text search engine. This article describes how you can use Lucene.NET to index text data stored in Windows Azure SQL Database, and then perform searches against that data.
NOTE: This does not provide an integrated full-text search experience like the full-text search in SQL Server. Lucene.NET is an external process that is queried separately from SQL Database.
NOTE: This article relies on the Azure Library for Lucene.NET (https://azuredirectory.codeplex.com/
) to store the Lucene.NET catalog in
a Windows Azure storage blob.
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
Free T-SQL Scripts
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Similar Messages

Is a Full Text Index search case sensitive or not in SQL Server 2012?

I setup full text index on my contact table and am attempting to run a search on it using the following query:
SELECT *
FROM sysdba.Contact C
WHERE CONTAINS(C.FirstName, 'Test')
OR CONTAINS(C.LastName, 'Test')
The problem is it's clearly running a case sensitive search. I did a quick search to find out how to change it to be case in-sensitive and found two pages (both for SQL Server 2012) with conflicting answers:
1 - MSDN - "Query with Full-Text Search" - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142583(v=sql.110).aspx
Case sensitivity
Full-text search queries are case-insensitive. However, in Japanese, there are multiple phonetic orthographies in which the concept of orthographic normalization is akin to case insensitivity (for example, kana = insensitivity). This type of orthographic normalization
is not supported.
1 - TechNet - "Full-Text Search (SQL Server)" - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142571(v=sql.110).aspx
Full-text queries are
not case-sensitive. For example, searching for "Aluminum" or "aluminum" returns the same results.
Can someone please explain this? Is it possible to do it without it being case sensitive? If yes, how?
(Sorry, I couldn't make those links b/c TechNet hasn't verified my account)
Thank you for your time and help,
Hanan

Whats the collation setting for the columns? try using a case insensitive collation as below
SELECT *
FROM sysdba.Contact C
WHERE CONTAINS(C.FirstName COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, 'Test')
OR CONTAINS(C.LastName COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, 'Test')
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

SQL Server 2008 R2 Express Edition and Full Text Indexing

Hello, we have recently upgraded our web front end server from SQL Server 2005 (Standard Edition) to SQL Server 2008 R2 Express Edition (in conjuction with upgrading our main production servers to SQL 2008 R2 Standard). We have 12 Databases on our production
SQL Server that are replicated to our web frontend server to the SQL Express instance. One of these databases has a FULL TEXT INDEX. The production database is running the Adobe iFilter version 9 64Bit. The FULL TEXT CATALOG has been created and populated
and performs searches as intended. However, upon replication, when using the search option on our web page based on that PDF iFilter, it no longer works. After examining the properties of the FULL TEXT CATALOG, we note that the Catalog size on the subscriber
end is 0MB in size (whereas it is 3MB on the Publication side). Also the Unique Key Count on the subscriber side is '1' whereas on the publisher side it is 30,000+. After examining the FT Indexing logs on the subscriber side shows an error: "Warning: No appropriate
filter was found during full-text index population" On the subscriber side which is running Windows Server 2003 and SQL Server 2008 R2 Express Edition, Adobe Reader 10.1.1 is installed (all 32Bit) with the Adobe iFilter AcroRdIF.dll. When running the SELECT
* from sys.fulltext_document_types T-Sql statement, the list returned shows the PDF filter to be installed and shows the correct path. Under the System Environment Variables, that path has also been installed (from previous recommendations in researching this
problem). After numerous reboots, service restarts and re-attempts to get the FT Daemon to crawl - no success. Can anyone please help with this problem? Is there something I am missing? In an attempt to work around this problem thinking there might be a version
conflict between the 64Bit version on the publisher and the 32Bit version on the subscriber, I disabled the replication of the FULL TEXT CATALOG and tried to create a new catalog on the subscriber with the same results. Thank you for your answers in advance
- Fustrated! Sorry, somehow this got posted originally under Server Design

Hello Jeff hope your still out there. I wrote this question 2 years ago and upgraded to SQL Express with advanced services. Full Text replication worked until last week. We are operating in a virtual environment. My publisher box
is a Windows Server 2008 R2 (64bit) with SQL Server Standard Edition. My Web front subscriber is a Windows 2003 R2 (32bit) Server with SQL Server 2008 R2 Express SP1 with Advanced Services. Now the exact same thing is happening after 2+ years.
We are looking for possible updates that might have broken this but I am stretching that. Any clues please? 32bit vs. 64bit?

Problem with Office document structure when exporting in Windows vs full-text indexing in SQL Server

Post Author: Atarel
CA Forum: Exporting
Product: Crystal Report for .Net 2005Version: distributed with VS 2005Patches Applied: hot fix crnet20win32x86_en_chf.zipOperating System(s): Win2000 Pro SP4, WinXP SP2, Win 2003 Server SP1, Win 2003 Server SP2Database(s): SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005Error Messages: None
We are creating reports with Crystal Report for .Net. We both have a Windows and a Web application connecting to our database. The problem occurs only with the Windows application. We create a report and in the dialog that appears, we choose to export the report in MS Word format. Everythinglooks fine because after we save the document, MS Word is able to open and display the document. However, when we decide to add this Word document in the database in a table that has a image column bound to a full-text indexing schema, that document is never indexed. After fiddling around for a few hours, we realized that the Word document produced during the export is not a true Word document but rather a RTF document that was given a ".doc" extension. Is there a way to have a real Word document when exporting in Windows. The problem does not arise in Web because when we export, the report is displayed in Internet Explorer through the Office plugin. The Office plugin knows how to same a real Word document.
There is also a problem when exporting to Excel in Windows. It does not yield the same structure as in Web. The format of the export in Windows is not compatible with the Office IFilter of SQL Server 2000/2005, therefore the content is not available for search queries.
Any patches to fix this problem?
Regards,
Ian Perreault

Post Author: Atarel
CA Forum: Exporting
Product: Crystal Report for .Net 2005Version: distributed with VS 2005Patches Applied: hot fix crnet20win32x86_en_chf.zipOperating System(s): Win2000 Pro SP4, WinXP SP2, Win 2003 Server SP1, Win 2003 Server SP2Database(s): SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005Error Messages: None
We are creating reports with Crystal Report for .Net. We both have a Windows and a Web application connecting to our database. The problem occurs only with the Windows application. We create a report and in the dialog that appears, we choose to export the report in MS Word format. Everythinglooks fine because after we save the document, MS Word is able to open and display the document. However, when we decide to add this Word document in the database in a table that has a image column bound to a full-text indexing schema, that document is never indexed. After fiddling around for a few hours, we realized that the Word document produced during the export is not a true Word document but rather a RTF document that was given a ".doc" extension. Is there a way to have a real Word document when exporting in Windows. The problem does not arise in Web because when we export, the report is displayed in Internet Explorer through the Office plugin. The Office plugin knows how to same a real Word document.
There is also a problem when exporting to Excel in Windows. It does not yield the same structure as in Web. The format of the export in Windows is not compatible with the Office IFilter of SQL Server 2000/2005, therefore the content is not available for search queries.
Any patches to fix this problem?
Regards,
Ian Perreault

"A severe error occurred on the current command. The results, if any, should be discarded." + Full-text-index Sql Server 2008 R2 SP1

Hello.
I have a problem with SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1:
I have a table with the full-text index-activated on 3 fields of type nvarchar.
When I try to open a transaction (ex: BEGIN TRAN {inserts} COMMIT) to insert multiple rows, I get the following error: "A severe error occurred on the current command ...".
I checked the Sql Server Logs and the Event Viewer on the machine, but nothing was logged.
I found a workaround: disable full-text-index => Do stuff => enable full-text-index, but this is very annoying (especially when i use the Data Compare to update that table on the Development Environment).
Help!!!

I concur with Tom. Upgrade to SP3. This may resolve the issue.
Since you say that there is nothing in the SQL Server errorlog, this may be an API issue. Try running the same commands through the command-line tools SQLCMD or OSQL to see how this turns out.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

SQL 2008 Full Text CONTAINSTABLE is VERY SLOW

Hello,
I am running SQL Server 2008 SP3.
I know I am not the only to have SQL Server CONTAINSTABLE query performances issues. However I think mine is very strange because it appears that the SAME IDENTICAL query produces completely different execution plans on two different sessions against
the same SQL Server/database.
This is the query:
select * from CONTAINSTABLE (TABChiamate,[Domanda],N'"dn"', 20)
My full text index has been completely rebuilt and it contains 1 million of rows.
What is strange about this query is that on the session where it works fine it runs in a fraction of a second, whereas on another session it's REALLY slow - taking 20/30 seconds to run (or minutes, depending on the top_n parameter).
Looking at the execution plans I see that the slow one is doing a TABLE/LAZY SPOOL on 741.000 rows, which making both CPUs of the server spin to 100% for the execution time (20/30 seconds). Obviously this is unacceptable since we have about one hundred of
users that could perform the same query in the same minute and I can't have 100 cores to complete the operation right?
However, I am not able to understand why this issue is strictly related to the Session... new sessions are running fine...
Anyone could help trying to figure out what to look for to explain this strange behavior? I tried to see all SET options to understand if they are different ... now my question is ... is it possible that execution plans are cached in a per-session basis?
Thank you in advance!
Adriano

Hi RFL, thank you for your reply! I try to answer your questions below.
Adriano, A few comments and questions.
1. What build level of SQL Server 2008 are you running?
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP3) - 10.0.5500.0 (X64) Sep 21 2011 22:45:45 Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (VM)
2. Your example query is apparently not identical to the two plans in the screen shots. Could you share two runs of the restricted query?
I just retried the same today and it appears to work correctly... however the main issue is that I am sure I'll face the issue in the next weeks as soon as the full text index will need a rebuild ... :-(
3. How many rows do the unlimited searches return?
127 rows.
4. Is the first query in the set always the slow one? Or, if you switch them around does slow query remain the same?
If you look at the execution plans above, the executed query is the same on 2 connections. I copied/pasted the same query, and on the first query window it was REALLY slow, putting both CPUs at 98% for many seconds/near a minute.
There was a bug reported here with optimization, SQL Server 2008, and Containstable. I cannot tell if the problem is identical to yours, but if you have not updated SQL Server 2008 since mid-2009 you might check for the fix to the following problem:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/003bb682-a7d2-489d-ad0f-123a8206b663/fulltext-search-containstable-near-broken-in-sql-server-2008?forum=transactsql
I've seen, but it seems not my case (I've SP3 and still having issues).
This morning I've seen that the query analyzer window got the connection broken, and I needed to reconnect. After reconnecting the same query window, the query went fast... but I am not able to understand WHY, it looks like the "bad plan"
was cached on the actual connection/process for some reason, and after a timeout it has been recalculated on the rebuilt full-text index... and actually now it works... but I am sure the issue will come back again in some days/week...
RLF
Adriano

Availability groups and full-text indexes.

Hello,
I have created an availability group that contains a database. The database is working fine.
I get a request to create a full-text catalog and to add full-text indexes.
Is it possible to create full-text indexes on databases that have a primary replica and a number of secondary replicas?
Best regards,
Erik

Hi hcv,
Microsoft will support full-text search in a clustered environment in SQL Server, so you can create full-text indexes on databases which are in Always on environment. In
the AlwaysOn Availability Groups, two types of availability replicas exist: a single
primary and some secondary replicas. To add a database to an availability group, the corresponding secondary database will exist until backups of the new primary database are restored to the server instance that hosts the secondary replica (using
RESTORE WITH NORECOVERY). You can refer to
back up and restore Full-Text catalogs and indexes.
There is an article about Full-Text Indexing in SQL Server, you can review them.
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/learn-sql-server/understanding-full-text-indexing-in-sql-server/
http://technet.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/aa214780(v=sql.80).aspx
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Exchange Server Information Store has encountered an error while executing a full-text index query

Hi Team need help
Exchange 2013 EAC doesnt show the databases and it gives message
"Your request couldn't be completed. Please try again in a few minutes."
Its a 9 Node DAG and I stopped and diabled Search and Search Host controller on all of them
in the event viewer see a lot of Event id 1012
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 4/1/2013 9:23:48 AM
Event ID: 1012
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: ex1301.dagdc.com
Description:
Exchange Server Information Store has encountered an error while executing a full-text index query ("and(or(itemclass:string("IPM.Note*", mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.Schedule.Meeting*", mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.OCTEL.VOICE*",
mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.VOICENOTES*", mode="and")), subject:string("SearchQueryStxProbe*", mode="and"), folderid:string("48A300C7FBA4DA408B80EB019A1CE94900000000000E0000"))"). Error
information: System.TimeoutException: Failed to open a channel.
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.ExecuteServiceCall(IProcessingEngineChannel& serviceProxy, Action`1 call, Int32 retryCount)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.ExecuteSearchFlow(String flowName, Dictionary`2 inputData)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.<ExecuteInternal>d__18.MoveNext()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.<ExecuteSimple>d__a.MoveNext()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Server.Storage.FullTextIndex.FullTextIndexQuery.ExecutePagedFullTextIndexQuery(Guid databaseGuid, Guid mailboxGuid, Int32 mailboxNumber, String query, CultureInfo culture, Guid correlationId, QueryLoggingContext loggingContext,
PagedQueryResults pagedQueryResults)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Server.Storage.StoreCommonServices.StoreFullTextIndexHelper.ExecuteFullTextIndexQuery(Context context, MailboxState mailboxState, QueryParameters queryParameters, PagedQueryResults pagedQueryResults, ExchangeId searchFolderId,
SearchExecutionDiagnostics diagnostics)
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="MSExchangeIS" />
<EventID Qualifiers="49156">1012</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>1</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-04-01T16:23:48.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>192599</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>ex1301.dagdc.com</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>and(or(itemclass:string("IPM.Note*", mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.Schedule.Meeting*", mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.OCTEL.VOICE*", mode="and"), itemclass:string("IPM.VOICENOTES*",
mode="and")), subject:string("SearchQueryStxProbe*", mode="and"), folderid:string("48A300C7FBA4DA408B80EB019A1CE94900000000000E0000"))</Data>
<Data>System.TimeoutException: Failed to open a channel.
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.ExecuteServiceCall(IProcessingEngineChannel& serviceProxy, Action`1 call, Int32 retryCount)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.ExecuteSearchFlow(String flowName, Dictionary`2 inputData)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.<ExecuteInternal>d__18.MoveNext()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Search.OperatorSchema.PagingImsFlowExecutor.<ExecuteSimple>d__a.MoveNext()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Server.Storage.FullTextIndex.FullTextIndexQuery.ExecutePagedFullTextIndexQuery(Guid databaseGuid, Guid mailboxGuid, Int32 mailboxNumber, String query, CultureInfo culture, Guid correlationId, QueryLoggingContext loggingContext,
PagedQueryResults pagedQueryResults)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Server.Storage.StoreCommonServices.StoreFullTextIndexHelper.ExecuteFullTextIndexQuery(Context context, MailboxState mailboxState, QueryParameters queryParameters, PagedQueryResults pagedQueryResults, ExchangeId searchFolderId,
SearchExecutionDiagnostics diagnostics)</Data>
<Binary>5B444941475F4354585D000084000000FF09000000000000000268000000808A00100000000080CA00100000000080B200100000000080D200100000000030FF001000000000309F00100000000030DF001000000000B09D001000000000B0DD001000000000B0ED001000000000B08D001000000000B095001000000000B0A5001000000000</Binary>
</EventData>
</Event>

Hi,
Please reenable and start the search engine service and try again.
The simillar case for your reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrgeneral/thread/4f43ef50-b71f-4ab3-8ced-70f1c36c5509
Hope it is hlepful.
Fiona Liao
TechNet Community Support

Disable "Full-Text indexing"

I've tested performance with and without Full-Text Indexing turned on. The performance is much better without this option.
My question is it Ok to turn this option off for ECC 6.0 / SQL 2005 ?
Thanks,
Ld
Edited by: Linwood Doty on Oct 4, 2010 8:00 PM
Edited by: Linwood Doty on Oct 4, 2010 8:01 PM

Hello Linwood,
Neither ECC (or BW) uses full-text indexing, so you can disable it.
You just need to enable it if you have this special requeriment.
Regards,
Eduardo

What is Full-Text Indexing

Hi
Currently am working indexing method.I what to know what is mean by full-text indexing could please anyone explain with examples and links thanks

The
full-text index is the basis of iFTS (Integrated Full-Text Search). Starting with SQL Server 2005, Full-Text Search supports the creation of indexes on XML columns and allows you to do extremely very fast searches of textual contents
stored in columns of the char, nchar, varchar, nvarchar and so on.
So it basically creates an index similar to one you can find at the back of any book. It contains a list of words, with pointers to the tables and rows that contain the words. SQL Server calls
this index, called a full-text index, when you issue a full-text query; it returns a list of rows that contain the words in your search phrase as shown in here
SELECT
* FROM Person.Contact
WHERE
CONTAINS(*, ‘“peanut butter” NEAR “jam”’)
There are
two ways to create a full-text index, Using T-SQL commands, and
using the Full-Text Wizard.
You can find the Wizard here in SSMS
To build your full-text catalogs and indexes in using T-SQL, you need to use the
CREATE FULLTEXT commands.
There are three commands for full-text index creation and maintenance:
CREATE FULLTEXT CATALOG
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX
ALTER FULLTEXT INDEX
I hope this helps too to clear up and gives you some hint in making do more research about it. If I were you I would buy this book and read if I need to have more knowledge about it. It's all about Full Text Search. Pro
Full-Text Search in SQL Server 2008 by Michael Coles with Hilary Cotter
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that has answered your question as it is very relevant to other community members dealing with same problem in seeking the right answer

Embedding Full-text Index into PDF File

Hello Everyone,
I've tried to create and embed full-text index into PDF file, but with no luck. I've followed steps described at http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Acrobat/9.0/Standard/WSC28D4DBB-6A78-4027-9E04-F50FE411CFB9.w. html - there can be seen progress of collecting of data and at the end the button Update index is enabled. This is signal for me that Index was created. After clicking on Ok button, saving document as new one and then reopening "new created" document, there is info that no Index is embedded in the Manage Embedded Index dialog. Is there any other step necessary to do? Or is it bug? Adobe Acrobat Pro 9.1 on Windows Vista 32bit is used.
Jan
PS: Interesting is also comment at the bottom of above mentioned help page...

Thanks for the response. It is true that if I make changes and look at the embedded index status, it shows that it needs updating
However the problem I can't get around after extensive testing is that sometimes for no apparent reason the index is dropped on save. This can happen if I check the status of the index to make sure it is valid, save the file, and reopen it.
I've concluded that this must be a bug and am using other indexing options for the time being.

How to link a full text index with catalog in a PDF file ?

Good morning and thank you for your help.
I already create some PDF files on a folder (with hypertext links between us) and I use the command "Tools\Document processing\Full Text Index with Catalog" to create an index; at this time everything works properly.
Now I want to link this Index to my first PDF file in order to use automatically this index on an advance search in this file.
I hope that someone may answer me!
Thank you.

Now I want to link this Index to my first PDF file in order to use automatically this index on an advance search in this file.
In the properties of the document:

Large text with national caracters and full text index

Hello,
I have some large portion of string to index. So of these strings contains national characters so I have stored it into a NCLOB column. I would like to put a full text index of this column but I see that it is not possible for NCLOB column.
Does anybody have the problem as me? If yes, how did you proceed? Could the XMLType be a solution ?
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Fred

Hi Fred,
"I do not think that I can manage all these characters with only one character set."
Sure you can. The main reason for using the NLS characterset has nothing to do with whether you can/cannot support multiple languages with your database charset. It is there primarily in case your db characterset is not some unicode/multibyte charset and you need to add support for it while maintaining your original db charset. A secondary reason is for certain performance considerations, but that is for specific application architectures and doesn't seem to be the case here. One of my apps supports virtually every language on Earth - not using the 'N''s'. I'm using AL32UTF8 - it is up to Unicode 4.0 in version 10gR2 of the db.
Choose a unicode character set for your db and you're fine unless you have some overwhelming reason why you are unable to do so. Any Text index will work for you and your problem is solved (and ctxxpath and context index will both work - just compare your requirements to the functionality provided by the index type).
Further reading:
Here's an OracleMag article from last Fall -
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/05-sep/o55global.html
Here's a white paper -
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/globalization/pdf/TWP_AppDev_Unicode_10gR2.pdf
Thanks,
Ron

Embedding full-text index via Script

Hello Everyone,
is there possibility to create and embed full-text index into my very long document via scripting Acrobat Pro? I've searched scripting API and there are objects like catalog or index, but both have only several methods and no embeding is mentioned there. Any help is appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Jan

try67 wrote:
You're better off using a real authoring application like InDesign or Word.
Thanks, but from this statement I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing. I mean index for full-text search - allowing to get immediate results after entering the search phrase, without any delay and (often quite slow) processing of the whole content. Now it is possible to embed it via Acrobat menu. I am asking whether this action has any equivalent in scripting API. I'd like to automate this process as now I have to do it manually via GUI (but luckily for the limited number of documents only).

Unable to full text index the contents in Oracle 11g UCM

Hi,
I am new to the Oracle UCM 11g.
i am unable to full text index the content files that are check-in into the Oracle UCM.
I have added the below entries in config.cfg file:
SearchIndexerEngineName=OracleTextSearch
IndexerDatabaseProviderName= SystemDatabase
AdditionalEscapeChars=-;#
While performing the indexing operation using Repository Manager only, metadata of the content files are indexed, but full text is not getting indexed.
What is missing here in Oracle UCM for not fulltext indexing the contents? What configurations do i need to do for this so that i can search perform the full text search on the Contents in Oracle UCM?
Thanks in Advance
Dipesh

Hi Srinath,
Collection rebuild cycle runs perfectly fine. After enabling tracing for Indexer and systemdatabse, i got the below info in the log:
"Finished rebuilding the search index with a total of 123 files successfully indexed. A total of 0 files had a full text index."
The below is the details of the activeindex.hda:
<?hda version="11gR1-11.1.1.3.0-idcprod1-100505T121221" jcharset=UTF8 encoding=utf-8?>
@Properties LocalData
UseImplicitZonedSecurityField=true
blFieldTypes=
ActiveIndex=index1
blDateFormat=M/d{yy}{ h:mm[:ss]{ a}}!mAM,PM!tGMT+05:30
@end
@ResultSet SearchCollections
7
sCollectionID
sDescription
sVerityLocale
sProfile
sLocation
sFlag
sUrlScript
TestHost
!csSearchDefaultSearchCollection
English-US
local
index1
enabled
<$URL$>
@end
Is it possible that OracleTestSearch Component is missing in Oracle UCM?
Thanks
Dipesh

Microsoft SQL 2k5 / full text indexing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for