Middleware-Filter criteria for Transactions replication.

Hi Experts,
Can we use filter criteria while transferring transactional data from CRM to R/3.
Like i want to restrict the replication of transactions of some BP's who belongs to one particular region. Based on the region field can i put the filter criteria for the transactions.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Nadh.

Hi Nadh,
I dont think if it will work. As this object is used for BulK messaging, hence you will not be able to create filters.
Regards
Keshav
PS: Please reward point if the info is useful.

Similar Messages

Middleware-Filter settings for the replication of BP from CRM to R/3

Hi Experts,
Can we set filter criteria for the replication of BP's from CRM to R/3 in the delta load.If so how can we achieve it.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Nadh.

Dear Nadh,
Pls go through the followings:
http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/crossindustry/crm/v240/BBLibrary/Documentation/B09_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_US.doc
http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/BBLibrary/documentation/D63_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_UK.doc
http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv250/CRM_DE/BBLibrary/html/BBlibrary.htm
C03
Thanks,
Atin

GWI: Add new filter criteria for replication object BUPA_MAIN

Hello,
we are currently setting up Groupware Integration with CRM 7.0 and Outlook Exchange 2007. We would like to filter the BPs that are replicated to Outlook's public folder. The replication object BUPA_MAIN in Tx. SMOEAC has only got the following criteria fields:
BPARTNER
CENTRALARCHIVINGFLAG
COUNTRYISO
INDUSTRY
IS_COMPETITOR
IS_CONSUMER
IS_CUSTOMER
IS_DELETED
IS_PROSPECT
PARTNEREXTERNAL
REGION
SEARCHTERM1
SEARCHTERM2
SITE_ID
We don't want to use any of those but would like to set a filter on BP Role and filter for all Groupware Employees. Only those should be replicated.
We did set the filter conditions in customizing under "Filter Condition for Business Partners Exchange with Groupware" in order to replicate only BP with role GWEMP but still during Initial Load all Business Partners were replicated.
Could anyone tell me how to avoid this?
I hear it's possible to add new criteria fields to the replication object BUPA_MAIN.
Could anyone tell me how this is done?
Your help will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Angela

Hello Angela
Usually the settings under "Filter Condition for Business Partners Exchange with Groupware" should be enough to avoid the synchronization. With those settings all BP are filtered out except the ones with role GWEMP (Groupware Employee).
We have the following setting in SPRO:
BUPA     1     BUP001           X     X
BUPA     1     BUP003           X     X
BUPA     2        X     X
BUPA     3                     X     X
(first column empty, second and third column with X, last column empty).
Regards
Marco

CRM 7.0 = ECC 6.0 Upload: Filter criteria for BUPA_MAIN

Dear Experts,
concerning filtering of BUPA_MAIN in CRM 7.0 => ECC 6.0 Upload we have already learned from SAP (to our surprise) that the only way is to redefine publication BUPA_MAIN as "simple intelligent" (Standard is simple bulk). BUPA_MAIN as "simple intelligent" offers a couple of fields (e.g. partner_no, is_customer) which can be defined as filter criteria.
We have the requirement to filter by a bp status field which is not part of this set. By the way, we expected the filtering in object management (TX R3AC1, filters are only valid for ECC=>CRM Dowload) or at least in the TX CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU by registrating a ZFunction module in CRM outbound for BUPA_MAIN. Under certain circumstances the later leads to errors in the subsequent middleware processing.
Has anybody a similiar requirement or does face the same problems?
Thanks for your help.
Regards, Mark

Hi Mark
Please put this request in the correct forum of CRM Middleware.
I am sure your will get the right help from the middleware experts.
Regards

Retrieving sort and filter criteria for interactive report

I have developed a test management system in APEX. Users log in and see an interactive report with their assignments. Each test they've been assigned occupies one row.
There is an "Execute" link for each row that takes the user to the test execution page, where they can see the input steps / expected results and report the test passing or failing.
I've implemented "Next >" and "< Previous" buttons on the execution page, so the user can immediately go forwards or backwards in his assigned tests without having to return to the assignments page and click the Execute link on the next or previous row.
The test execution page figures out what the next and previous assigned test is using the LAG and LEAD functions, like this:
lag(assignment_id) over (order by ref_num_full) prev_id,
lead(assignment_id) over (order by ref_num_full) next_id
Notice that I've "hardcoded" the over clause to be the reference number of the test.
The problem here - this solution ignores any custom sorts or filters the user has put in place on the assignments (interactive) report.
Is there a way I can "grab" the interactive report (1) sort criteria and (2) filter criteria dynamically? I'm thinking I could then use dynamic SQL to build an OVER clause used in the lag/lead calls so that the application now follows whatever sort and/or filter criteria the user has put in place.
Any help is greatly appreciated...thanks!!

Thanks WTine!
I took a look and determined
- I can get the sort criteria from the APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_IR_RPT view (SORT_COLUMN_# and SORT_DIRECTION_# columns)
- I can get the filter criteria from the APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_IR_COND view
Regards, Rich

At what point is it a good practice to Drop and Add back an Article for Transactional Replication?

Hi,
We have transactional replication Setup in our company , a set of tables involved in replication needed to be reloaded on prod say about 12-13 Million rows .
We decided to drop the articles and add it back to replication so that a new snapshot for the specific articles can be generated and the transfer of data is fast and no breakage in the replication.
But what is the best practice or a threshold point for taking this route i.e dropping an article and adding it back ?
I mean
when Is it good to go this route i.e when the load is more than 10, 000 rows or 50.000 rows 100,000 or at what number do we start this process?
Thanks,
Jack

That is a function of horsepower and bandwidth.
If you do drop a table out rather than replicate a 1% change of its data, 100% of the table will need to be snapshotted which might cause havoc with users trying to access that table, and if you are running immediate sync all of the tables will need to be
resnapshotted.
With the Enterprise Edition of SQL Server you will be able to use a sync type of database_snapshot which will mean no locking, otherwise it could be painful. Initialize from a backup is also an option to save you the cost of a snapshot.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

Settings for transactions replication from CRM to ERP

Hi,
Can you explain or point to documentation on what settings we need to configure in CRM and ERP side to replicate the transactions such as quotation, Sales Order etc from CRM to ERP?
As I understand we can use Adapter Business objects in CRM to transfer the ERP documents to CRM transactions?
What is the method for transferring in the other direction?
What are the customization things we need to maintain in both systems? Such as having the same transaction and item category types defined in both systems etc..
Please clarify this replication process.
Thanks

Take a look at the following notes:
620139
642944
888665
889051
And for replication of customazing and data take a look at building blocks B09 and C03.
However be aware that you will have to create transaction types and item category types on CRM, because this customazing can't be synchronized from ERP. So it has to be done manualy.
Regards.

Assigning filter criteria for custom message type.

Hi everyone,
In our requirement i have created a custom message type ZDEBMAS like debmas. now while creating a distribution model with this message type, i need to create a filter for this.
only IDOCs of customers with Account group 0001, 0002 and 0012 has to be triggered. I'm able to create the filter with message type DEBMAS, but while i'm using message type ZDEBMAS i'm unable to create any filter. Can any help me in this.
thanks in advance,
Rajni

Hi!
Do you create filter with BD95 and allocation with BD59 transactions?

How to set filter criteria for month and year using in timestamp input field?

Hi,
I am using jdev 11.1.2.3,
I have one problem with Report generation,,,,,,I have one report table which is in the form of VO(query based) and i want to search this table as month and year basis
but in this table(query) that field having timestamp based value.. how to search with month name and year only.. Here i am using totally query base VO's for generating
reports........ Can any one guide me.
Thank You.

You can use a inputdate, which allows you to selecte a moth, year and a day. Once the selection is made you convert it to only allow moth and date like
        <af:inputDate label="Label 1" id="id1" autoSubmit="true" value="#{bindings.myMonthYear1.inputValue}">
          <f:convertDateTime pattern="MM/yyyy"/>
        </af:inputDate>
        <af:outputText value="Selected #{bindings.myMonthYear1.inputValue}" id="ot1" partialTriggers="id1"/>
then you have a string holding month and year only. This value you split into two variables you or pass it as a whole parameter to the query and split it there.
Another way is to add two static lovs one for month and one for year and use them to get to the filter values.
Timo

Need help adding filter criteria for reports with the GO URL + Post method.

In attempts to hide some of the information from the URL, we've decided to go pull the parameters out of the url used in the GO Url method. We've managed to get it to retrieve the report and display it without showing the user name and password how we cannot seem to pass in any search criterias.
The following is what i have:
Can anyone help me with this issue? or provide any suggestions?
Thanks!
form id="form1" runat="server" action="http://452.342.424.421/analytics/saw.dll?Go" method="post">
<input runat="server" id="Cmd" type="hidden" name="Cmd" value="Answers"/>
<input runat="server" id="nqUser" type="hidden" name="nqUser" value="admin"/>
<input runat="server" id="nqPassword" type="hidden" name="nqPassword" value="admin"/>
<input runat="server" id="Path" type="hidden" name="Path" value="/users/abid.farooq/Countries" />
<input type="hidden" name="Options" value="fr" />
<input type="hidden" name="Action" value="Navigate" />
<input type="hidden" name="P0" value="1" />
<input type="hidden" name="P1" value="eq" />
<input type="hidden" name="P2" value="%22Location%22.%22Country%20ID%22" />
<input type="hidden" name="P3" value="CHN" />

Hi,
Instead of this,
<input type="hidden" name="P2" value="%22Location%22.%22Country%20ID%22" />
can you try this:
<input type="hidden" name="P2" value='"Location"."Country ID"' />
Here, instead of enclosing the value in double quotes, enclose in single quotes. Also replace %22 and %20 with double quotes and space.
Try it and let me know if this helps!
Thanks

Set filter criteria on page 1 for page 2 OData model - "best practice"?

Hello, I have a problem with an app - where I want to filter data on a second page, based on settings from the first page. I use an OData model.
The collections on both pages are not related in terms of "navigation" properties, that is my problem and I can not change the data source...
So I am looking for ideas/best practices to solve this because sometimes my filtering doesn't work... the following problem occurred: Request aborted
I have a page with a sap.m List with items="{/tabWorkPlace}" and and a local JSON model where I store relevant data during the app lifecycle.
handleListSelect - first page
var context = evt.getParameter("listItem").getBindingContext();
var dataModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("dataModel");
var workplace = context.getProperty("WORKPLACE_ID");
dataModel.setProperty("/WORKPLACE_ID", workplace);
this.nav.to("SubMaster", context);
The general App.controller.js handles the nav.to function:
var app = this.getView().app;
var page = app.getPage(pageId);
if(pageId == "secondPage") {
page.getController().filterData();
And the controller of the second page:
filterData: function() {
var oModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("odata");
var dataModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("dataModel");
var workplace = dataModel.getProperty("/WORKPLACE_ID");
var items = this.getView().byId("list");
var oFilter=new sap.ui.model.Filter("WORKPLACE_ID",sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.EQ,workplace);
items.getBinding("items").filter(oFilter);
I don't write this code into the onInit() or beforeRendering() function, because they are called only once and I am navigating back and forth between the two pages, because the pages are created only once and "just" the data is changed.
The desired page looks like this - with an other collection bound to it:
<List
id="list"
select="handleListSelect"
items="{/tabWorkstep_Status}"
>
But when I call it - then the request gets aborted:
The following problem occurred: Request aborted
But despite the fact the Request is aborted, the list on the second page is filtered!
The filter criteria for the model works when I type it into the browser with URL. Maybe this fails because the data binding for the list didn't took place at this phase?
I have this pattern (filter criteria on one page and result on the second page) more times - (and I think a better data model would be better with navigation properties would be better, but I cannot change it)
But at another constellation the filtering doesn't work - same error... the following problem occurred: Request aborted
I also don't want to change the pattern (page 1 to page 2) into popup lists or this fancy new filtering possibilities because it is not suitable for my use case.
Is there maybe a more elegant solution - because sometimes filtering works, sometimes don't..., do I have an error in my solution (general approach)?
Many thanks for any input!
BR,
Denise

Hello, yeah you are right, but it works without the odata> stuff because of this in App.controller.js:
var uri = "http://localhost:32006/JsonOdataService.svc";
var oModelMS = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel(uri);
sap.ui.getCore().setModel(oModelMS, "odata");
oView.setModel(oModelMS);
So my question is - how to navigate from one page to another - and on the other page first bind a collection to a select and then when selecting bind certain elements (a textfield) to the selected filtered entity.
The stuff with context and binding won't work, because the two Collections don't have a navigation/association property between them...
So for example:
page1
select a list item with property color: red and year 1985. Press one of the buttons and pass this criteria to another page.
page 2:
show a dropdown box with all car names which fullfill this criteria, and when one car is selected, then display the data for THIS car in several text fields.
This is not a master->detail navigation example, because on page 1 i select certain criterias, and then with buttons I navigate to several pages with those criterias.
But since the OData model has no relationships it is really hard to do it manually... With a dummy mock.json like in DJ Adams Fiori like SAPUI5 apps it is no problem... But with OData and no things related to each other it is hard...

Additional filter criteria in F110

Hi All,
I understand that there is an additional filter criteria in transaction F110 but is it only to filter specific criteria?
For example, i want to use the allocation field as a filter criteria. I have many documents which are automatically posted to the system with the same leading characters - i.e ABC123, ABC445, ABC918.
In F110, is there a way to ONLY select items with allocation field starting with ABC?
Any help is much appreciated.
Thank you in advance.

Dear,
In selection go to document level fields and select Assignment (ZUONR)
Put ABC* and then try if it works...
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Filter Criteria.......

Hi,
I have a question regarding setting up filter criteria for a business object.
This mean, where/how to set up the fields that can be used for filter criteria. If I go to SMOEAC, it shows the list of tables and corresponding fields. They need not be keys fields of those tables. So questions is how and where to set up/decide these fields.

Hi ray,
the fields that you can use in replication objects are dependent on the Bdoc headers (they are defined in the segment fields). In the case of bupa_main, they are:
BPARTNER
CENTRALARCHIVINGFLAG
COUNTRYISO
INDUSTRY
IS_COMPETITOR
IS_CONSUMER
IS_DELETED
IS_PROSPECT
PARTNEREXTERNAL
REGION
SEARCHTERM1
SEARCHTERM2
SITE_ID
The filter fields of the download objects on the other hand are not dependent on Bdocs, bu are defined in table SMOFFILFLD.
Grtz,
Michael.

In SQL Server Transactional replication what all changes I can do on subscriber table

In SQL Server Transactional replication what changes I can do on subscriber table
Thanks

Hi Ajay.G,
According to your description, if you want to do some updates at the Subscriber, you need to note the following things.
•If TIMESTAMP or IDENTITY columns are used, and they are replicated as their base data types, values in these columns should not be updated at the Subscriber.
•Subscribers cannot update or insert text, ntext or image values . Instead, you could partition the text and image columns into a separate table and modify the two tables within a transaction.To update large objects at a Subscriber, use the
data types varchar(max), nvarchar(max), varbinary(max) instead of text, ntext, and image data types, respectively.
•Updates to unique keys (including primary keys) that generate duplicates and then they are not allowed and will be rejected because of a uniqueness violation.
•If the Subscriber database is partitioned horizontally and there are rows in the partition that exist at the Subscriber but not at the Publisher, the Subscriber cannot update the pre-existing rows.
For more information, see: Updatable Subscriptions for Transactional Replication
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Target group from filter criteria of an attribute list.

I have created an Attribute list in the T-code CRMD_MKTDS and a filter criteria for this attribute list.
Now, I would like to use this filter criteria to create a Target Group.
So, is there any Function Module, standard Report program or methods of any standard class to create a target group using this filter criteria ?
How can I determine the BPs related to the filter criteria and assign them to a Target Group?

Hi,
You can use class 'CL_CRM_MKTTG_GENIL_TG' or Function module ''CRM_MKTTG_TG_READ'
to create Target group's from Profiles.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Anup

Middleware-Filter criteria for Transactions replication.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for