Mighty Mouse Tracking Problems with Mac mini core duo

I have a new Mac mini core duo (2GB RAM, 100GB HDD) and I'm having problems with my USB Might Mouse.
The cursor stutters and doesn't track with the movement of the mouse and it will sometimes leap to a different part of the screen or get stuck at the last place it rested. At other times the mouse will track smoothly for a while before starting to stutter again. The behavior isn't consistent.
Is anybody else having tracking problems?
Any thoughts on what might be causing this behavior?
iMac G5 20 & Mac mini 1.42Ghz, PB G4 1.67Mhz, Mac mini core duo Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Hmm, this could be one of two things. Your mac might be faulty (Harware wise) which would suck. But, hopefully it is a problem with your drivers that need updating. Try these 3 options.
1. Update you mouse driver.
2. Update you video card driver (Video cards can sometimes affect mouse sensitivety -don't ask why)
3. This is my last solution, before consulting a technician (For money if you can do it free talk to one!) or returning your mini: Try reformating/reinstalling Max OSX and if u have bootcamp check out wat happens to the mouse in XP check for the same problem if it doesn't happen in XP your hardware is safe. IF the problem continues after this... looks like your hardware is bad in that case i recomend a return or send back (If your on warranty).
GOod luck,
Wannabe

Similar Messages

After I updated lion to 10.7.4, app store does not recognize my ID APPLE and it unable to connect me to app store in order to update/download apps? What have I to do? I have the same problem with mac mini e mac book air. Please help me!

After I updated lion to 10.7.4, app store does not recognize my ID APPLE and it unable to connect me to app store in order to update/download apps? What have I to do? I have the same problem with mac mini e mac book air. Please help me!

Your advice did not help me. I also installed 10.7.4 combo but the situation is the same.
my internet connection is ok, mail is ok, but app store after 3 resets does not recognize my ID and it says "connection is not possible". Why? I have the same problem in both my mac mini late 2009 and mac book air 2010? Is it a problem of 10.7.4 update? I have to solve this problem and how can i return to 10.7.3 if my last backup was not with 10.7.3???thank you for your kind collaboration...

Mac Mini core duo upgraded with Atheros Airport Extreme

An update for those interested - In a posting Nov 12, 2010,
https://discussions.apple.com/message/12574450
Al Cellier said : Earlier this year I upgraded my mid-2006 Mac Mini (Core Duo) with an (Macbook Original Wireless WIFI Card 802.11n AR5BXB72 - Atheros) Airport Extreme Card to get N-WiFi. That works fine in Leopard 10.5.8; but in 10.6.4 & 10.6.5, I can't get connected to my router. Is a new driver needed for 10.6 ? Network Utility / Info Tab / Network Interface (en1) reports "Model: Wireless Network Adapter," as (802.11a/b/g/n). As an aside, the Bluetooth seems much flakier now than with the original card.
The update, as of July 21, 2011 has that now that I have installed 3 antennas onto the WiFi card instead of just one, and now the Mini works great in Snow Leopard 10.6.8 !!!
We are getting full 300Mbps status on the n protocol.
No added drivers or tweaking, just the antennas and the system update (system update alone was not enough).
Mac user since 1984, and an optimist ...

I purchased 2 extra antennas (I found the seller on ebay; they are small circuit boards with attached cable and tiny connector). They sit just outside the box at each rear corner, and are taped to the housing; the cables were fed into the unit thru the ventilation slots, carefully routed to the wifi board where they snap into place. Unfortunately I didn't take photos inside; I could photograph the antennas sticking out, if you want.

DVD Display Quality for Mac Mini Core Duo

I'm moving from PC to Mac, starting with a Mac Mini Core Duo as a media server.
The spec looks great, but I'm concerned that the CNet review says that on their test machine:
the DVD- and video-output quality was marred by false contouring (banded or splotchy colors), moiré patterns (line distortion), and jagged diagonals
I can't find any mention of this problem in this forum, so perhaps CNet had an early version, or a manufacturing defect, or was poorly configured.
To put my mind at rest, can anybody confirm that the DVD player works fine for them on this system? And if so what exact configuation they have?
Mac Mini Core Duo Mac OS X (10.4.6)
PC (Toshiba Tecra) Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Yes, large display - I'm outputting to a Panasonic
AE900 projector and putting up a 90 inches diagonal
picture.
nice setup.. OSX with Front Row is a good platform for HTPC. Unfortunately the picture quality is not as good as what you can obtain with PC's. but it is still plenty good. Then again, if you will watch DVD's only, I would recommend getting an upconverting DVD player (Oppo is a good brand for 200 bucks aprox). Again, check out the avsforums, you'll find plenty of useful info and very helpful people.
Gmas.

Mac mini Core Duo in 1280 x 720 @ 60 Hz on Mitsubishi WD-52525

So I picked up a Mac mini Core Duo last night (my first Mac by the way, and so far I'm very excited about it) with the intention of using it as a home theater computer (HTPC). I intend to use my Mitsubishi WD-52525 DLP as the display device, and, for now, using RCA inputs on my Pioneer VSX-07TX for sound.
This thread is for the video problem. I cannot seem to get the Mac mini to display a proper 1280 x 720 @ 60 Hz signal on my display. I'm using the included DVI-VGA adapter and the WD-52525's VGA input (named "PC") which is supposed to be capable of receving a 1280 x 720 @ 60 Hz signal.
When I did this through DisplayConfigX I got a beautiful picture that was horribly overscanned. Trying to tinker with the DisplayConfigX settings yeilded less than stellar results, and it seems as if some of the options to fix back porch (bottom overscan) are "buggy" according to the software developer.
So, my question is, how can I get the Mac mini to output a 1280 x 720 @ 60 Hz signal that will fill the available screen on the WD-52525?
Guidance appreciated.

I too took the plunge and recently purchased a Mac Mini Core Duo. I have it hooked up to my Mitsuhishi WD-52825 (the one with the built-in DVR). The mini is hooked up through the HDMI connection on the 825 using a HDMI/DVI converter. Thus far, I have had success at least viewing the desktop on the TV, but I either have overscan or less than a full screen picture when "overscan" is unchecked in the options tab of the display panel.
I have also tried Displayconfigx, which terrible results. Everytime I change the resolution, and then reboot, my screen is filled with skewed images, which I have to change from my iMac using a VNC client/server setup.
Hopefully I'll eventually find the correct setting for the Mac Mini because there doesn't seem to be much I can do on the Mitsubishi end using a DVI-HDMI connection. Any suggestions?
Frank

Mac Mini Core Duo or Power Mac G5?

Ok, so I'm very excited that I'll be making another Mac purchase soon, but I don't have a lot of money.
What I would like to know, is basically whether to get a Mac Mini Core Duo (hooray for todays update) or a little older Power Mac G5 1.6 or 1.8 GHz.
Why the G5 you say? The case is beautiful! Also, it's a bit more upgradable.
I won't be doing a lot of demanding things, mostly internet, some light Photoshop CS, and other OS X features. With the G5, I won't get Boot Camp but that's why I have 3 other PCs.
So which seems more logical or sensible? Both are pretty close price-wise once I configure the Mini.
Thanks for any input! Just want to get some opinions.
(I also know what model G5 to look for with the increased FSB, RAM, etc. I'll only go for the 1.6GHz if the 1.8 offers a substantial performance boost.)

I have a G5 dual 2.0 (one of the original models) and while I don't own a dual core mini, I've had the chance to test a few of them as they have been bought and added to the networks I support. In my experience, the mini has been noticeably faster in pure processing terms, but the limitations of the slower drive speed makes a considerable difference when comparing systems running disk-intensive tasks.
Add that to the fact that as yet Photoshop is not universal and will thus run under Rosetta on the mini, and is in itself an application that uses considerable 'paging' activity (swapping data to and from the hard drive) and you would find that all else being equal, the G5 would generally surpass the mini's performance. The same would not be true of less disk-intensive applications running in native mode on the intel system, where sheer performance of the dual core system would beat out the G5.
Bear in mind however that RAM is a critical factor. Common experience at present suggests that Intel-based Macs typically require rather more RAM than PPC Macs, and you cannot afford to loose track of the fact that with software such as Photoshop, large, fast hard drives and lots of memory are often more critical than sheer power.
Also bear in mind when making a choice, that a G5 system will consume considerably more power and generate more heat as well as requiring more space. If these considerations are not important to you, then in my view at this time the drive speed, expandability and performance of a G5 running non-native power applications would make the older system a more attractive proposition - certainly for the short term.
To me, the real question would be how soon I would be anticipating replacing the system. Neither would cease to be viable in the next few years, but the more the system would cost to buy, the longer it would typically need to remain in service. If the G5 cost significantly more, it would generally be needed to stay in active service long after Photoshop has gone native and the power of a cheaper intel Mac outstripped the capabilities of the G5.

Annoying Sound (Fan???) From Mac Mini Core Duo

Hello all.
I have an Apple Mac Mini Core Duo which was upgraded by Apple (custom order) to 1 GB RAM, everything else is default.
The fan noise is annoying from this computer, and it annoys me because it is advertised as a "silent" computer. It isn't a wind tunnel like my old Powermac G4, more like an electric whining sound. And it is constant (not revving up and down like I have read elsewhere). When I first opened it from the box about a week ago, it was fine, but then the noise started after a day or two. It got so bad last night that I reset the SMC firmware, which helped a bit, but not a lot.
I have the latest firmware installed, the latest SMC firmware installed, and I have run both Apple Diagnostics and Techtool deluxe and everything is being reported as fine. Furthermore, I have installed Coreduotemp, and the temperature is hovering around 46 degrees C, occasionally going up to 50, but nothing to worry about. One thing that does seem funny, is that it always seems to be running at 1.67 GHz, but I've heard that it is supposed to rev itself down to 1 GHz when not in heavy use (and it says Mini: 1 GHz right in coreduotemp). I checked my Mom's iMac Core Duo (20") and it does the same thing, and hers makes absolutely no noise whatsoever, so I doubt that is the problem.
The sound probably wouldn't annoy me, but I find myself monitoring it because I'm scared I have a defective unit (I've still got 1000+ days of coverage), so I'm diverting a lot of my attention to the noise. IF this is normal, I'll probably just forget about it, so is this normal?
PS. I'm a smoker, but I always leave my window and door open for ventilation, so it is not a smoke filled room, it just has some smoke in it. I have used other computers in the same condition though (and my Mom is a heavier smoker around her iMac), and they haven't exhibited these symptoms, so again, I doubt this is the problem.
Post if you need more info.
Second PS. It is not incredibly loud, in that the electric hum from my florescent lights DOES drown it out.
Mac Mini Core Duo w/ 1 Gig Apple Suppled RAM and a Powermac G4 Sawtooth 400 MHz Mac OS X (10.4.7)
Message was edited by: rm6990

Yes, it definately was, however, not right away I don't believe. I did Software Update almost immediately after hooking up my Mini, and the SMC update comes automatically through Software Update (and I ran the firmware updater after Software Update installed it). So I know it started after I updated the SMC firmware, I just don't know if it was immediately after.
Is there anyway to downgrade the SMC firmware to check, or should I just put up with the noise?
EDIT: And the noise definately started BEFORE I upgraded the Firmware (not SMC) on the Mini, because I tried upgrading the firmware to see if it would fix the issue.

Trying to install 10.7 on a mac mini core duo that has a core 2 duo cpu

I have installed a core 2 duo cpu (T7200) in an earlier Mac Mini core duo machine. Runs fine, the system report shows the Core 2 chip. When I try to install 10.7 over 10.6.8, however, the installer reports that it cannot install this version of OS X on this machine.
It is possible of course to install 10.7 on another machine and clone that to the hard drive here. But that seems like the hard way, jumping through too many hoops. Surely there must be somewhere in the (list of) plist files to tell the installer that it is OK to put 10.7 on this machine. I've tried a few places but w/o success. Perhaps someone is a good system hacker who knows how to do this? Many thanks,
tony

I agree-- that is a method that is often suggested. I apologize for doing the Yes, but.... routine; I have several other Macs, but I'd have to back one up (or clone it), clear the hard drive, install 10.7 on it, and then go through your suggestion. In principle it seems straightforward. I might have to resort to that. I had hoped that it would be possible for a more software-centric way, of convincing the installer that the machine was OK; Have I missed something here?
I've tried several suggested methods, and the closest so far is to get an installation from a bootable usb stick that looks like it's installing and then I get a circle with a line across it. No error messages.
the machine is a 1,1 original that now runs fine with 2 gigs memory, a core 2 duo (T7200) cpu. and 10.6.8.
I have tried removing the lines in the plist files that require the 3,1 machines, etc. but that has not helped.
If my time was worth more than 10 cents an hour I should have thrown the sucker away and bought a new one. I have an i5 Mini that screams. any more suggestions are most welcome.
thanks
t

Mac mini core duo graphics card

We are considering getting mac mini core duos for our kids -- but a question has arisen about the graphics card for both OS -- mac and windows. Is it powerful enough to handle games? My partner is concerned that as the games get heavier, 3D, etc., the mini graphics card may not be able to handle them well enough.
Thanks!
susan

sadly, he is right...although the mini can handle 3D games, the quality is what you would expect from an integrated graphics chip...extra RAM is a must, but for it to handle games 2, 3 years from now, the mini may not be your best option...anything with a dedicated graphics card would be better
Mac Mini Intel Core Solo Mac OS X (10.4.6) 1 GB RAM-Superdrive

Mac Mini Core Duo 1.83 vs. Dual 450 G4

So I know somebody selling a Mac Mini Core Duo 1.83 for $200. My current machine is a Dual 450 G4. Would the Mini be a faster machine? I know it seems like a stupid question, but the Mini has been maligned because of its Integrated Graphics (my g4 450 dualie has a Radeon 8500 with 64 megs dedicated). I mostly use my machine for Photoshop, Indesign, music production and light video work.
I'd have to bump up the Mini's ram (it's only got 512 mb); my g4 has 1.75gigs of ram. Other than hat, would the Mini seem like a faster machine?
Opinions?

VRAM≠more performance.
I didn't say it did.
Integrated graphics steal from the main system memory and resources, so they shouldn't be considered when doing amateur or professional editing software.
It's true that on-board graphics use main RAM, thus removing 64Mb of memory from availability to the system, but out of a total of 2Gb, or potentially 3.3Gb on a C2D model, that is hardly a factor. It must also be said that while dedicated VRAM is a better bet for absolute performance, sharing high speed main RAM is also rather better than much slower VRAM on dedicated video cards such as the 8500 mentioned previously.
As to whether the presence of shared RAM rather than dedicated RAM should exclude a system from consideration when doing 'amateur or professional editing', I'd say that depends on the user, and that user's genuine need. Nothing, in the world of purchasing decisions, should be excluded until it is known to be unsuited for any of the reasons an individual might have. Given there would appear to be many people using Mac minis for tasks including video and image editing (including myself), it would seem clear that at some level these systems are perfectly suited to the task.
His Dual G4 has 1.7GB of RAM, a lot more than what the mini has—512MB.
Current Mac minis don't come with 512Mb RAM, and can be expanded to 4Gb (of which 3.3 is usable to the system).
The only category in which the mini wins is in CPU.
Actually not. Just about everything in a Mac mini is faster, not least bus and RAM speed. The only aspect in which there is parity is in the 5400rpm internal drive that both systems come with as standard.
That is not to say the G4 doesn't have advantages, as I have mentioned before it. It is far more expandable, with additional internal drive bays and where it is almost child's play to fit a fast internal, a better burner, more RAM an Airport card (though 802.11b only of course, not 802.11g) and even replace the CPU. The G4 is a true (and venerable) workhorse. Mine is still in service after almost 10 years and remains a favorite 'go to' system. What it is not, however, is fast.
Isn't it kind of obvious that if the person is using the Dual G4 for editing, he has PPC versions that run fast on his machine? That brings up another thing: If he were to use the software on his Dual G4 on a Mac mini, there'd be no benefits because, as you know, it'll run on Rosetta, which means that it'll run a lot slower than an Intel Application because it's being emulated.
Actually, as long as there is sufficient RAM, PPC apps will run as well, or faster, on an Intel system of sufficient speed differential, and your argument pre-supposes that the user is based on dated versions of applications which are not Intel-native, or cannot be readily up/cross-graded. At some point, a serious user has to consider that, even if not planning on a new purchase, since systems fail and need to be replaced, even if not always planned. At least buying into the Intel platform ensures forward compatibility and the ability to plan for future needs. To me, that's a critical part of using any system for anything other than simple pleasure.
Anyway, I have no intention to debate you on this - merely counter the point of view you expressed, which I believe to be somewhat misleading, and which directly counters my practical experience of running these applications on systems based on the same architectures the OP was discussing as options. As such, I remain certain that in every practical respect, excepting hard drive data access speed where the DP 450 has at least the ready ability to use 7200rpm internals, an Intel mini will outperform the G4 system in these broad uses. In my experience, the difference is notable.
Since the OP has your view, and mine, he or she is able to make an informed choice.

Noisy mac mini core duo.

Hi!
My Mac mini has a fan with what seems constant rpm that is really annoying. The fan is making much more noise than the harddrive at work. It does'nt matter if I use distributed.net or let the computer idle the fan is still going strong at it's own pace. I'm a bit worried about the cpu and harddrive since the cpu temperature goes up to 85+ celsius on itensive tasks. I'm using CoreDuoTemp to measure the temperature and the program also tells the current frequency and it seems that the cpu does'nt scale down as it should. It's constant at 1.67GHz and according to the program it should be 1GHz when the computer is idle. I would like to know if I have a faulty hardware or if it's software related.
/Cheers
AndreasJ
Mac Mini Core Duo Mac OS X (10.4.7)

There are several possibilities. First, try resetting
power management...
I've tried that and it's the same.
If this doesn't work try creating a new user account
and see if the fans still do their Boeing 747
imitation. If so, AppleCare will recommend that you
reinstall the OS do you might as well try an Archive
and Install next.
The computer doesn't sound like an 747. I removed the temperature cable on the motherboard. Then it sounded like an 747.
I'm just annoyed by the continuing humming that the computer emitts. Some people say there Minis are dead silent but I can't agree. It makes to much sound to have it comfortable on my desk where this good looking thing should be.
Then there is the safety factor. When I'm pressing my Mini I want the fan to work accordingly to avoid the computer from overheating.

Mac Mini Core Duo and 23" Cinema Display: video graphics performance

I know the Mac Mini Core Duo and the 23" Cinema Display are compatible but can anybody tell me if one can expect better graphics performance when using a 20" display or does it not make any difference?

Thanks Dan but maybe I didn't make myself clear. What I'm interested in is whether or not one can expect a noticeable difference in video graphics performance between a 20" Cinema Display and a 23" Cinema Display, when connected to a Mac Mini Core Duo.

Mac Mini Core Duo with Final Cut Express HD 3.5

Has anyone had any success running the new binary version Final Cut Express 3.5 on a Mac Mini with a Intel Core Duo and 2 gigs of ram. I was wondering if it would run well enough to be worth getting.

Has anyone had any success running the new binary
version Final Cut Express 3.5 on a Mac Mini with a
Intel Core Duo and 2 gigs of ram. I was wondering if
it would run well enough to be worth getting.
FCE 3.5 runs great on my Mini with 1 gig of RAM. It will run even better with two. No problems other than if you want to open your projects in Final Cut Pro (as I need to do) you need FCP 5.1. Anything earlier won't open it.
PowerBook 12", Intel Mini Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Intel Mac Mini Core Duo Midi USB Issues

Is anyone else having issues getting Midi devices to work with the Intel Mac Mini's? I have several Midi devices that are't working correctly event though I have installed the newest drivers.
Currently I am having issues with a M-Audio Midisport 2x2 USB adapter. I loaded the newest drivers (ver 3.2.2) which are supposed to be universal binary to support the Intel Macs. When I connect the Midisport 2x2 to the Mac Mini I can not get it to receive Midi Output from the Mac.
When I look in the Midi control pannel I can see that the Midisport has been installed, but all options to select it are greyed out. Also when I try to select it as the input or output there is NO option to select the Midisport from the pull down menu. It only shows the "Built-in Midi" as and option.
The Midisport works fine on other non-Intel Macs. Please advise.
Thanks!
Mac Mini Intel Duo Core 1.66Ghz Mac OS X (10.4.7)

It seems like the mini is doing alright so far. I think maybe the full erase solved whatever issue it was having. I also got my Core Duo Mini yesterday in the mail and it's performing like a champ. Definitely a nice machine.
I'll close my question for now, since the Core Solo Mini seems alright. But, as a warning don't get on Front Row's bad side. I tried force quitting it because it was taking too long to load the videos folder and then tried shutting down from a terminal and ended up having to turn the machine off.

Mac Mini Core Duo 2 RAM Addressing

I would like to upgrade my Mini Core Duo 2 667 MHz RAM to the maximum level of 4 gigs. It was purchased new from Apple in the spring of 2009. I have read on YouTube that this particular model cannot address the full 4 Gigs of installed RAM, instead it can only address either 2 or 3 gigs of RAM even though 4 gigs are installed. I have also heard that if 4 gigs are installed the "About This Mac" window will say that only 3 gigs are installed, but that the computer will actually use the full 4. Can someone please clear up this confusion?

Welcome to  Discussions!
If your mini is showing a 667 MHz bus for the RAM, it's a pre-'early 2009' model. Your limit will be 3gb of RAM, even if you install 4gb (2x2gb sticks). About This Mac will show the 4gb installed, but you will only be able to use 3gb. You are best off running a 2+1gb configuration and saving some money. The 'early 2009' mini has a 1066 MHz bus and can actually support 8gb unofficially with an upgrade to the EFI Firmware.

Mighty Mouse Tracking Problems with Mac mini core duo

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for