MIGO and MR8M

Hi Guru,
We have a PO created and Goods Receipt made. When we made a invoice using MIRO and reversed this invoice using MR8M
Goods Receipt Entry ( MIGO Entry)
Dr. Inventory account
Dr. PPV ( Account for Purchase price variance)
Cr. GR/IR account
MIGO Entry ( Invoice)
Dr. GRIR account
Dr. Gain/Loss account
Cr. Vendor
User revesed this entry using MR8M ( Credit Memo)
Dr. Vendor
Cr. GRIR account
Cr. PPV ( Another account for Purchase price varaiance) instead of Gain/Loss account.
Can i know the reason why reverse took a different account instead of Gain/Loss account.
Will assign good points.
Thanks

Dear user
Your MR8M is not a Credit Memo, both are different processes and behave differently. MR8M you are cancelling the processed MIRO document inside Logistics, while Credit Memo is to reduce the Outstandings due to Vendor for to some reason for which we do not want to pay him.
Apart from the suggestions which has been given by others, i also suggest that ,
please check the STOCK which existed during MIRO procesing and later during MR8M posting. As your PPV account gets hit in this manner unless there is stock available/support during the MR8M transaction processing.
Regds
Sam

Similar Messages

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

How to restrict the quantity & rate of MIRO with MIGO and PO

Hi friends,
Can any body tell me how to restrict the quantity & rate of MIRO with MIGO and PO.
e.g. if we have done MIGO for quantity 10 and the rate maintained in the PO is Rs.100.Then at the time of MIRO system should not allow to change the quantity and rate.
How we can do this?
Regards
Purnesh Sharma

Hi,
You are misunderstanding the use of MIRO.
If you change the details in MIRO you are NOT changing anything. You are just entering the price and quantity from the Invoice.
If this price and or qty is different from the GR aqty and PO price then the system will block the invoice for payment (and it can issue messages toinform the buyer if configured correctly).
The whole design of MIRO is based on the principle that you enter EXACTLY what the vendor has put on the invoice. By preventing the users from changing anything you will get NO mismatched invoices, but you will not be paying the vendor the amount specified on their invoice. This will surely cause problems.
If you do want to ensure that ONLY the GR qty and the PO price are used and cannot be changed then why not consider using ERS (Eveluated Receipt Settlement. this is basically self billing.
Effectively you will be paying the vendor based on what you have received in MIGO multiplied by the price from the PO. (which is what you would be doing if you stop any changes in MIRO)
Steve B

Why req MIGO and MIRO in third party scenario

Hello All,
In third party scenario why we req to do MIGO in ref to PO.
In 3rd party we create sales order with item cat TAS.
We got the PR
with ref to PR we create PO.
then we do MIGO and MIRO
also If vendor is delivering the goods why we do the Delivery and PGI and then Invoice
Why not Invoice with ref to sales order.
regards,
abhijit

Hi
In Third Party sales, the Item category is TAS ,if the Vendor directly supplies to the end customer.
In Item category TAS, "Billing Relevance" is "F", i,e. Order related billing as per invoice quantity.
If the Item category of the Third Party item is TAS, then Schedule line category is CS in standard. If you will go to CS, you will find , the "Delivery relevance" field is blank and there is no "Goods movement" also. That means no Delivery takes place against the Sales order, so no goods issue.
This clearly indicates, we do not create any Delivery and no goods receipt takes place in third party sales process, when the vendor directly sends the goods to the customer.
Once the goods are send to the end customer, Vendor creates an invoice and sends to the ordering company. Now, ordering company goes for Invoice verification ,what the vendor has sent to him. We only go for MIRO here and not MIGO.
After that, the ordering company, creates the Customer invoice with reference to the Sales order(placed by its customer) and sends it to its customer.
Complete process:
Once the order is received from the custome(say ABC)r, the company (say XYZ) creates a Sales order ---> Purchase requisition is automatically triggered from the sales order -
> from this Purch requisition a PO is created for the vendor -
> aginst the PO, Vendor delivers the goods to the customer ABC and charge the ordering company,sends invoice for the same to the ordering company XYZ -
> Ordering company XYZ does Vendor's invoice verification and creates a Customer invoice with reference to customer's(ABC) order and sends to the customer ABC.
Some times Vendor sends the goods to the ordering company and then ordering company delivers the goods to its customer.
Vendor does not deliver directly to the end customer in this case.
In this case Item category is TAB and Schedule line category is CB.
Here, Billing relevance is "A" - (Delivery related billing) in the Item category TAB, that means here Delivery takes place and Billing is created with reference to the Delivery created to the customer.
In Schedule line category CB, you will find, 'Delivery relevance" field is activated and there is a movement type "601".
So, Delivery and goods issue both takes place here.
Here we go for both MIGO and MIRO.

How to GRN date (MIGO) and Goods posting date (MB1C) as a Characteristcs

Dear All,
Our customer wants to include GRN date (MIGO) and Goods posting date (MB1C) as a Characteristic for a batch.
And he wants the system to pick up these dates automatically for batch.
So in batches will be sorted out based on GRN (MIGO) or Goods posting (MB1C) date.
Is there any standard characteristics available for these fields?
How to achieve this functionality.
Regards,
Mullairaja
Edited by: MullaiRaja on Jan 7, 2011 8:28 AM

Closed

AT1 field not display in MIGO and J1IEX

Hi Experts,
i am using Secondary higher cess amount it will display AT1 Field wise configured. but i do not get this field in MIGO and J1IEX.
what i am doing
Reg
Kishore

Check Note 926707.It will hopefully solve your issue
Regards,
Indranil

Update Ledger group in BKPF at the time of MIGO and MIRO

Hi Friends,
In our current implementation we have requirement to update a certain Ledger group, to restrict the postings in all ledgers, at the time of positng in MIGO and MIRO.
Can you please let me know how we do this.
Waiting for your reply,
Madan Mohan

Hi Santhosh,
Thanks for your reply. But in the substitutions at header and line item level i didnt find the 'U300' userexit.
Can you suggest me at what level i can find that user exit.
Thanks and Regards,
Madan

Migo and Batch master showing different vendor

Hi Experts,
Process Followed:
1. In Migo Screen selecting goods reciept and Others and movement type 901 i will enter all the details such as material, quantity, plant,vendor-X and then click on check then system creates internal batch number.
2. After System creates the internal batch number i will change from Vendor - X to Vendor Y in migo and save it
3. Then if i see the batch master then system is showing the Vendor X in batch master instead of Vendor Y.
Please let me know how can i update the vendor in migo the same to batch master after changing in Migo. Please find the attachments
Regards
Badari

Hi,
Seems to be the error mentioned in the note: 1695572 - Incorrect vendor in batch for goods receipt of consignment. You may check the note and proceed accordingly.
Regards,
AKPT

Returns to vendor agter MIGO and MIRO

hI,
I have made on PO, did MIGO and MIRO for the same (CIN)
Now i want to send back the material to vendor in two scenarios
1) After MIGO
2) After MIGO and MIRO
3) After payment has been done.
Regards,
Satyendra

Hi,
For First case you can use 102 mov type against material document to return material.
For Second & Third cases
1) Create a return po and check the return item field in the po detail.
2) create a return goodds receipt with migo. 161 will happen automatically.
3) create a credit memo thru. miro.
4) crease a excise invoice for other movements thru J1IS (if material is excisable.)
5) post a excise invoice thru J1IV
Revert back if any doubts.
Ashok
Reward is useful.

EXIT for MIGO and MB01

Hello,
I need to find a BADI or USER-EXIT for MIGO and MB01 at the time of posting, to store in table BSEG fields ZBD1T LIFNR ZTERM the table EKKO.
I found User-exits several but none contains the BSEG as output instead contains MSEG and the MKPF which I serve.
Someone can help me?
Thanks
Diego

Try this BTE 00001120
link:
Fill in BSEG-ZUONR with PO BEDNR field
Thanks,
AMS

Business area in migo and miro

hi,
i activated business area financial statement in ob65.and i make gl field status and posting key field status business area is optional.and i assigned business area to plant in OMJ7.
while doing migo and miro business area is not taking for gl a/c.
is there any further settings required for this .please give me the solution to resolve this issue.

Hi
Encountering the same issue ...any suggestions pls
Have activated BAFS in OB65 and assigned Plant Division combn to Business area in enterprise structure. But still business area is not getting defaulted in MM and excise utilization transactions
Thanks and Regards

Path to tcode MIGO and MIRO???

I can't find the path to tow tcodes MIGO and MIRO.Help me, please!!!
Thank you for reading my post^^

Hi,
MIGO
SAP Menu> Logistics-> MM-> Inventory Management> Goods Movement--> MIGO
MIRO
SAP menu-> Logistics> MM->Logistic Invoice verification-> document entry----MIRO
Regards,
Biju K

Purchase Order, MIGO and MIRO

Dear All,
Please guide me how to map the below scenario in SAP.
We have to procure Material 'C' for that we have to get the Material 'A' from "X" Vendor. And it has to be delivered to "Y" Vendor. Then vendor "Y" uses Material 'B' and he does some processing and deliver Material 'C' to us. How to raise a purchase order, how to do MIGO and MIRO.
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
1. Raise the PO(1) against the X vendor (materila A). in PO give the delivery address as Vendor Y..( it is in PO itemdetail tab)...
2. create one more PO(2) (as subcontract) with item cater as L and issue to Vendor Y....
Item C should have BOM as mateila A...
3. Now you receive the materila A at vendor Y as against the PO(1).... (vendor X deliver the materila directly to vendor Y)...
Now for when you do migo for the PO(1), it will hapen for movement type 101 and in backgorund it create the 541movement type to vendor Y ( issue componet to sub contract vendor )
4. Settle the Invoice of Vendor X in MIRO seperatly.
5. receive the Goods from the subcontract vendor (y) throug MIGO
6. do MIRo for PO(2)
Hope you understoud this...
REgards
anand

Any pointers to a badi for transaction MIGO and MB1a

Hi all,
Can anyone tell if there is any badi which can give us all the values entered by the user in transaction MIGO and MB1a.

Hi Anu,
whenever you need a BADI...
Follow the below steps to find out what all BADI's are called when you press any button in any transaction.
1) Goto se24 (Display class cl_exithandler)
2) Double click on the method GET_INSTANCE.
3) Put a break point at Line no.25 (CASE sy-subrc).
Now
4) Execute SAP standard transaction
5) Press the required button for which you need to write an exit logic, the execution will stop at the break point.
6) Check the values of variable 'exit_name', it will give you the BADI name called at that time.
7) This way you will find all the BADIs called on click of any button in any transaction.
[found on SDN a year ago, don't remember the contributor]
Regards,
Clemens

MIGO and MR8M

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for