Migo_gr & other is migo

I i want to investigate one thing for my user exit ,There are two t.codes for MIGO ,one is migo_gr & other is migo, I want to check whether the user has used t.code MIGO OR migo _gr, how it can be checked please let me know
Edited by: Sameer.S on Jan 11, 2010 10:48 AM

Hello,
Go to table MKPF where enter the username and the year of posting. (if you know that material document number, then you can key in those details)
You will see weather the user has used MIGO or MIGO_GR in the field TCODE2.
Thanks,
Sakthi

Similar Messages

  • MIGO_GR Authorization check for PO Document type

    Hi Friends,
    We would like restrict users processing GR's against certain PO document types. In brief, <b>X</b> group of users are allowed to process GR's against PO document type <b>'NB'</b>  only. This validation should take place soon after they enter the PO number or at the check level in MIGO_GR.
    Unfortunately, MIGO does not provide relevant standard authorization object... or EXITS to achieve this.
    Appreciate, if you share your expertice in this regard . Points will be awarded...
    Regards
    Kumar

    By defining custom authorisation object.

  • Alternate Tcode For MIGO

    Hello Gurus,
    What is the Tcode for listed below other than Migo
    Transfer Posting
    Place in Storage
    Display
    cancellation
    Goods Issue
    Goods Receipt
    Remove from storage
    Release GR blocked stock
    Return Delivery
    Subsequent Adjustment
    Subsequent Delivery
    Regards
    Arasukumar

    hello Gururs,
    Thanks you Immediately Reply
    Is there  any Tcode for
    Place in Storage and
    Removal from Storage
    Other Than Migo
    Regards
    Arasukumar

  • Migo/miro

    Dear All,
                 i purchase goods from a vendor, he hires the transport (truck) and sends goods  to us.
    at the time of MIGO, i have 2 delivery notes- one from the vendor who has supplied the goods and the other from the freight carrier.
    i want to capture both against each other in MIGO how this can be achieved?
    the reason is that during MIRO, i can select individual delivery note and clear there invoice separately.
    as the freight payment is made immediately at the time of goods receipt and purchase department is sitting at other location, the purchase department doesnot know which truck on which goods have come belong to which purchase order.
    thanks and regards

    Hi Kavita,
    This is an issue faced by all when the transporter is not known in advance and the amount has to be paid to the transporter on receipt of material.
    At PO level a freight condition is given with the freight vendor ( if known ). However through " condition SPRO "  you can allow person making GR to define the transport vendor ( different than PO ( the transporter must have a vcode though). ( The value though cannot be entered at the GR Level.) This books the freight value on the inventory.
    The actual payment can then be done against the delivery cost with MIRO. Since value cannot be entered at the time of GR, there will be a difference between system proposed value and the actual freight value during GR. This will get loaded on inventory ( incase of MAP) or to diff account ( in case of std. price and depending on the customising setting.
    Crux is, at best you can give the control of transport vendor selection to person making GR but not value.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Rajeev

  • Default selection in MIGO

    Hi Experts,
    When I execute MIGO, system remembers last selection criteria and displays the screen.I want to display Goods receipt against purchase order whenever I execute MIGO transaction.Is this possible?
    Eg:If I do Goods Issue last time using MIGO,next time whenever I execute MIGO,only goods issue screen will be displayed for that particular user.
    Regards,
    Sibinraj

    Hi,
    You have following options for users
    Option-1:--->
    To appear MIGO t.code only for GR with PO
    For User-1,use t.code: MIGO & select  A01 Goods Receipt & R01 Purchase order and press F3 button in key board .Now always  User-1 will have Goods Receipt &  Purchase order for MIGO t.code.
    Option-2:--->
    For User-2,use t.code: MIGO & select  A07 Goods Issue & R10 Other and press F3 button in key board.Now always  User-2 will have Goods Issue & Other for MIGO t.code.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Transfer Posting Mov Type 311 restrict "R10 Other"

    Hi Gurus,
    The Client wants to make transfer posting mov type 311 against a reservation and restrict the option "R10 Other" in MIGO. The users will only be allowed to make transfer posting against a reservation. Is this possible? Could I unable this option from MIGO for this kind of movement?
    Regards

    Problem solved
    SPRO->Materials Management->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Settings for Enjoy Transactions->Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO)->Settings for Transactions and Reference Documents

  • MKPF_T CODE issue

    Hi Friends,
    In MKPF table, we have a field TCODE... when I do a transaction using MIGO this field is getting populated as MIGO_GR, basicaly this is being used to extract the material movement data from MM Inventory Management (MM-IM) consistently to a BW system.
    IN BW reports it will accept only when the field is having value as MIGO, please let me know why this is getting populated as MIGO_GR.
    Is there any other ways to do GR other than MIGO?
    Regards,
    Guru

    Hi
    In general the following tcodes are available for goods movement
    MIGO     Goods Movement  -- (Most commonly used for GR)
    MIGO_GI     Goods Movement
    MIGO_GO     Goods Movement
    MIGO_GR     Goods Movement
    MIGO_GS     Subseq. Adjust. of Material Provided
    MIGO_TR     Transfer Posting
    as mentioned by Csaba Szommer, this is updated in TCODE2 field, this is a standard behaviour by system.
    But certain users are still contunuing to use old t-codes like
    MB01     Post Goods Receipt for PO
    MB0A     Post Goods Receipt for PO
    MB11     Goods Movement
    MB31     Goods Receipt for Production Order
    So, i suggest, better check things in your system completely and then you can decide
    Thanks !
    E.Avudaiappan

  • Automatic generation of PO at GR

    Hi,
    I am trying to generate PO automatically at the time of GR.
    1. I have marked movement type 101 as relevant for Automatic PO generation in the node "Create purchase order automatically"
    2. My plant is assigned to a standard purchase organization
    3. I have a valid info record
    Question is,
    1. which transaction should I use for GR? " MIGO > Goods Receipt > others" or "MIGo>Goods receipt> Purchase order" or something else?
    2. if I do as "MIGO > Goods Receipt > others", I am getting a error "Enter vendor". But I have already mentioned vendor in the item details level at "Partner" tab-  field label 'Vendor'
    Pls help.

    Hi,
    When you have done all setting for creation of auto PO during GR, then you need to enter Vendor number during GR( in MIGO t.code & reference as Others ) as you have activated  LIFNR field as a Mandatory field for 101 movement type. when you save  the GR ...automatically PO will be created &  you can see PO number by displaying the MIGO Document.
    Note: Check all setting
    A) In SPRO ---> Enterprise Structure ---> Assignment -
    > Material Management ---> Assign Std. Purchase Org. to your Plant...
    B) In Material Master -
    > Purchasing View -
    > Pl. Check. Automatic PO check Box and Maintain Purchasing Group....
    C) Create your Vendor for your Company Code and Std. Pur. Org. combination and in that Vendor Master -> Purchasing Data View--- > Pl. Check Auto. PO Check Box...
    D)For your Vendor -Material Master - Plant -Std. Pur. Org combination Maintain valid Info record...
    E)In OLMB ---> Goods Receipt -
    > Automatic Creation of PO ---> for the M.Type:101 pl. check Auto PO check Box
    6) In OLMB ---> Movement types ---> Copy,Delete, Check M.Types ---> Choose the M.Type:101 and go into Details -
    > Then go to allowed Fields for M.Types for M.Type:101 ---> there for the M.Type:101 make the field LIFNR as a Mandatory field...
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • The system could not create any outputs for mv type 561

    Hi,
    I tried to print out a goods receipt others in MIGO and i received "The system could not create any outputs" when i tick on output control. I tried to follow the steps in How to print the material document in MB1C movement 561 I stuck at step 4 where i cannot find MvT 561. Please help
    Chk your setting as below to get GR print out.
    . Maintain the Printer Name in MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Print Control-> Gen Settings-> Printer Setting Enter the local printer where you want to print your Goods posting document
    2. Ensure that in MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Print Control->Gen Settings->Item Print Indicator, 1 stands for Matl Doc print out
    3. In MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Print Control->Gen Settings->Print Version, maintain Print Version 2
    4. In MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Print Control->Maintain Print Indicator for Goods Receipt/GI/Transfer Posting Documents
    Here for Particular mvt type 101,201,121,311,313,501,521,561 etcu2026 Maintain the Print item as 1--Material document printout
    5. In MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Output Determination->Maintain Output Types, for the Output types WE01, WE02 and WE03, ensure the following--
    Select the particular Output type then goto Details
    a. Default Values: Dispatch Time is 3 or 4 as per reqmt. and Transmission medium is 1
    b. Print Parameter is 7
    6. In MM->Inv Mgmt and Phy Inv->Output Determination->Printer Det->Printer Determination by Plant/Str Loc , Maintain the Output device for all your Plants
    7. Go to MN21, for Tr Type WE, Print Version 3, maintain Print Item as 1.
    Now the settings are ready for Printing Material doc
    8. While doing MIGO, ensure that in General Tab, you get "3 Collective Slip" beside the Print Indicator and you tick mark the field.
    9. Now depending on the setting in 5a, the Matl doc is printed. If it is 3, you have to print it using MB90. If it is 4, it is printed immediately.

    issue is resolved

  • Transfer order Return

    Hello everybody,
    I am dealing with transfert orders return.
    I created a delivery (VL10G) , posted goods issue (VL02N), and posted goods receipt on the other side (MIGO on Outbound delivery- mvt 101).
    I then created a return delivery (MIGO Return Delivery against Material Document VIA Delivery) and posted goods issue (VL02N).
    In MMBE, I have now my returned quantity on "StckTrsptOrderRel" on the company level.
    How can I receive these quantities to get them back in the stocks of my firstly shipping (vendor) plant? What T-Code should be used?
    Thanks,
    Laure

    Dear Laure,
    Normally the process for intercompany 'return' stock transfer is as
    follows:
    1) Create an intercompany stock transfer order with flag 'Return'
       (transaction ME21) or an item with the return flag (field RETPO)
    2) Create a delivery with VL10G
    3) Create with the transaction MIGO a goods receipt from the receiving
       plant (the plant that created the NB purchase order for return -
       therfore the quantity is negativ)
       The quantity is then transferred to the transit stock.
    4) Post a negative GI for the created delivery with BWART 673 which
       will transfer the quantity from transit stock to the unrestricted
       stock to the receiving plant. (the actual issuing one)
    (For Intra company   Two step procedure 671
                         One step procedure 677)
    5) Create a credit for it
    6) and check this credit.
    Please check in your business process if you follow these steps. Step
    two and three can be switched but the other steps should be done in this
    order. Review note 95808 for further information.
    From customzing point of view:
    Set delivery type for return delivery
    1) IMG  >  MM  >  Purchasing  >  Purchase Order >  Returns
       Order > Return to Vendor
    2) Assign Delivery type "RL" to the appropriate supplying plants
    Create a Vendor and tie it to a sold-to in the customer master
    1) XK01 - create a vendor (be sure to tie it to a sold-to party in
       'Customer' field of the second screen    LFA1-KUNNR). Verify that it
       is tied to a Purchasing Organization and in the Purchasing Data
       screen select 'Returns Vendor'.
    2) When the 'Return Vendor' is flagged, the system will prompt you to
       associate the vendor with an SD customer master (which you can
       create at this point).  Make sure to create the customer master as a
       sold-to party, not a ship-to.
    I hope this information helps!
    Regards
    David

  • Cost center quantity restriction

    hello all,
    i want to make check on goods issue against cost center with movement type 201
    for different materials i want to restrict the quantity to be issued against cost center.
    for Ex.
    1)for material A with cost center XYZ i want to restrict that only 200nos will be issue for particular month AND IF MORE QUANTITY TO be issued (more than 200) than system will show the error message.
    2)for material B with cost center same as above XYZ I WANT TO RESTRICT QUANTITY to be issued In monthwise.
    pls provide some input.
    is there any standard settings available?
    regards
    Sumit Simran

    Hi Sumit,
    I dont think this can be achieved in standard.
    One solution in my mind is as follows (use ABAP help)
    Step 1.
    Create and Use a log table (ie, a transaction where a responsible person will enter the fields)
    Month
    Year
    Material
    Cost center
    Qty
    Unit of measure
    Step 2.
    Use technical help [MB_MIGO_BADI or any other ]   in MIGO posting such that while posting 201 movement the values of
    (month , year, material , cost center, qty and unit of measure --- take sum) need to be checked from MKPF and MSEG tables and to be compared with the value in the log table.
    If value is exceeded then posting should be restricted.
    hope it helps
    sBk
    Edited by: Sujithbk on Jan 20, 2012 7:46 AM

  • Equipment Status ESTO

    Dear Experts,
    I  want to send one material with serial number (Equipment) to vendor.For that i dismantled from respective location and moved to the store using 561 movement type.(Goods receipt against "other" in MIGO).Now i am sending the same to vendor using the MB11 (Movement type- 541.Stor location- XX01)
    That means i am moving the material from my storage location XX01.
    After i send, if i check the equipemt status, still its showing the status ESTO.Whether the status describes the material is lying in our warehouse or Vendor's warehouse? But its clearly indicating the vendorcode  in the Serial No. tab in IQ02.
    So the system must show the relevent status.
    Please reply.
    Regards,
    Prasanna

    hi prasanna
    541 mvt type is used in subcontracting purpose,it you do the transactive with 541 you can see the status of the material in MMBE T code where it will show material is in vendor premises,when you do the goods receipt the material inventory will reduce.you can check in the equipment master Edit>special serial no functionms>manual transaction  you can see the stock type
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Clarification required on EP level Authorization in comparision with R/3

    Hi All,
    I want to be clear with the concept of authorizations in EP compare with R/3.
    The following the sample concept which we need it, is it possible in EP! Any suggestions or ideas will be apprecialted.
    Requirement:
    <b>If one R/3 user ID is required for all EP Users How are we going to control the authorizations at EP Level? (For example one EP User is required only MIGO another EP user is required MIGO& ME21N)
    If I want to restrict some functions of MIGO to some EP Users how is it possible?( like only goods receipt for one EP User goods issue for another EP User). Is it at EP level or R/3 Level?
    How do I hide the unwanted fields at the EP User level Transactions? (In MIGO if I want to hide all the not required fields is it possible)
    How is it commercially benefit to client? ( If I have the 10 C&F Locations how is it commercially viable to go for EP)</b>
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sireesha.B

    Hi Sireesha
    Requirement:
    <b>If one R/3 user ID is required for all EP Users How are we going to control the authorizations at EP Level? (For example one EP User is required only MIGO another EP user is required MIGO& ME21N)</b>
    -> Not possible becoz u map two portal user to one R3 User, since Authorization check is perform at R3 level so both portal user have same authorization for transaction code which R3 user have. U only restrict to view the iview for tranasaction. means u may create two different role for two portal user one role contain MIGO iview and other contain MIGO& ME21N
    <b>If I want to restrict some functions of MIGO to some EP Users how is it possible?( like only goods receipt for one EP User goods issue for another EP User). Is it at EP level or R/3 Level?</b>
    -> same as above authorization check is perform according to R3 User rights which u mapped to portal user.
    <b>How do I hide the unwanted fields at the EP User level Transactions? (In MIGO if I want to hide all the not required fields is it possible)</b>
    -> If u use tranasaction iview than it's not possible.
    <b>How is it commercially benefit to client? ( If I have the 10 C&F Locations how is it commercially viable to go for EP)</b>
    -> I can't understand ur question can u clerify it.
    conclusion: -> u need to map one portal user to only one R3 user so authorization is done according to R3 user rights.
    regards,
    kaushal

  • Transfer of stock

    Hi,
    My industry sector is Health care. We have one department there called CSSD. This the dept where we issue the materials for cleaning and washing , and once it is cleaned CSSD sends it back to the dept. again for the usage and vice versa.
    1)     Each material will have some Usage life suppose 10 times, after this I cannot reuse it:  How can I map this in SAP?
    2)     Now, please let me know which movement type I have to use for  this process, as every time when I am using it in department , CSSD cost need to be captured:  How can I map it in SAP ?
    Pl help
    Uts

    hi
    the washing is done by any vendor ?
    is it in house or subcontracting
    did u want to add the ashing cost in the material cost ?
    i dont think it is need ful
    u just make direct invoice in FB60 for value ,like 300 inr in text maintain the quantity and material
    now
    once u have use ur material 10 times u just scrap it as follows
    Then do Goods Issue > Others (In MIGO, use movement type "551" - GI for Scrapping, Specify a Cost Center against with expense is to be booked)
    During this material movement, following A/c Entry will get generated; (from OBYC)
    (BSX) RM Stock A/c - Cr
    (GBB-VNG) Scrap Expense A/c - Dr
    if ur vndor and material both to be come in picture then u have to go for SERVICE or SUBCONTRACTING scenario
    hope it clears
    regards
    KI

  • Wi don't disappear if user cancel the transaction

    Frinends,
    I'm testing one scene, that the wi calls one transaction, and this transaction calls (by button click) other transaction (MIGO).
    If the user cancel the MIGO and go back and exit... I want the wi continue in inbox.
    I remember that once a time Ramki answered me to user EXIT_CANCELLED statement in the method, controlled by a variable. But I don't know how to use this statement.
    how can I do this ?

    Hi Peter,
    That's it, but I didn't understand how to do this...
    1- I have to create a variable ...
    2- if I identify that the user had canceled the transaction, I have to interceptate with the EXIT_CANCELLED macro. But how I call this macro... because I've tested and put it on the end of the method directly, but the wi disapears always.
    eg.: (Is this the way to do that ??????)
    begin ... method
    call ... MIGO
    if (some condition, I don't know)
      EXIT_CANCELLED.
    end if.
    end ...method
    Please, helpe what to do step-by-step.... I think it isn't so hard to do...
    Thanks,
    Glauco

Maybe you are looking for