MIGO IN THIRD PARTY

IN THIRD PARTY TRANSACTION CAN WE HAVE STASCTICAL MIGO FOR ANALYSIS PURPOSE?
IF YES PROVIDETHE STEPS FOR CONFIGURATION.

Hi,
in the third party scenario there is no physical goods movement.if u want to do statistical GR
then do this configuration.
goto material management-purchasing-account assignment-maintain account assignment categories
in this select ur account assignment category 1: goto details-select goods receipt check box.then save.then do the trasaction.
if it helps pls do the reward points
thsnks&rewards
veera.

Similar Messages

  • MIGO- in Third party sale

    Hi,
    We will do migo in third party  customer sales(SD),
    once we do migo, what are effects of migo, i mean value updation or quantity.
    What is diff of this migo when compare to vendor suppllies good to company plant.
    Is migo is nessasary in third party sale
    regards
    chidambaram

    Hi,
    Posting MIGO is necessary in Third Party PO as it is in the case of Standard PO.
    The customer or your representative at customer's site confirms you that the material from vendor has been reached the customer's site. The papers are handed to you & you then post the MIGO. The effect of PO is that the material supplied to the customer is updated.
    The FI entries at the time of MIGO are -
    Debit entry to COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) Account
    Credit entry to GR/IR Clearing Account
    For the excisable material supplied by vendor in third party PO, you can not post the excise invoice (part 2 entry). You can only capture the same (Part 1 entry). This is because, you are neither receiveing material physically to your plant nor processing it. You pay your vendor for the excise duty & bill your customer. The customer may however take the excise modvat.
    After you post MIGO & MIRO (Invoice) then only you can bill on your customer for the material supplied by the vendor (directly to the customer.)
    Other effects of the MIGO are same in third party PO as well as Standard PO.
    Hope this clears your query.
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Cannot do MIGO in Third Party Sales Process with shipping notification

    In the Third party sales process with Shipping notification,the item category for the material is TAS (Billing relevance=R),item category group is BANS.
    Intially sales order is created,then using me21n with reference to purchase requisation purchase order is created,then in MIGO stage i used the PO No there but i get the message no item found in PO.
    what adjustment have to be done in order to do MIGO

    Refer following SDN thread, by that you will be able to get overview on best practices about Third Party Sales & necessary configuration you need to follow for statistical GR:
    - Third party direct shipment (II)
    Further maintain Billing Relevance for Item Category as G - Order-related billing of the delivery quantity.
    Regards
    JP

  • Third party sales- why MIGO in our system?

    Why we do MIGO in third party sales scenario, as we dont have stock movement in our plant?
    In the case- third party vendor delivers the goods directly to customer?
    Please clear me?
    Edited by: arshad ahamad on Feb 4, 2008 9:28 AM

    Dear Arshad,
    Certification does not guarantee you job - for that matter no one can give you a guarantee. it is up to you to get a job - prove your knowledge, creditbility, work experience and communication all these things count in an interview.
    Certification is an acknowledgement that you know something plus in SAP.
    Thank n regards,
    Ganesh JK

  • MIGO- why we do it in third party sales?

    Why we do MIGO in third party sales scenario?
    what is the effect of it on- our inventory?
    (In the case- third party vendor delivers the goods directly to customer)
    Please clear me?

    Incase of Third Party, the scenario can be mapped with 2 possibilities (Check details as under):
    http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1500/BL_India/index.htm
    Path: Technical Info --> Building Blocks --> Country: India
    J54: Third Party with Shipping Notification (MIGO required)
    J55: Third Party without Shipping Notification (MIGO not required)
    It depends on configuration whether MIGO is required or not.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful

  • THIRD PARTY -MIGO

    IN THIRD PARTY TRANSACTION STASTICAL MIGO BY MOVEMENT TYPE-101 IS POSSIBLE?
    IF YES PLEASE EXPLAIN THE STEP FOR THE SAME TO ACTIVATE.

    Hello,
    As you know, when you do MIGO in third party processing, no physical stock is getting updated. The relevence of this is to update the consumption accounts.
    Prase

  • While doing MIGO & MIRO for Third Party V/D

    Hi Gurus,
    While doing MIGO for Third Party Vendor, I am facing the below mentioned error.
    Maintain number range object for object J_1IRG23A1, year 2008, excise group V1
    Message no. 4F159
    Kindly suggest the solution for that.........
    After this i'll come to MIRO

    Goto J1I9, there put Object "J_1IRG23A1" and click on Number Ranges button, there for Excise Group "V1" maintain No. Range with No. Range Code "01"
    Pankaj Singh

  • Doubt about third party process

    Hello SD Consultants.
    Recently i joined in a company...so here we implement third party process.. My colleague has implemented third party process.
    here he has done...va01...me21n...migo...miro and vfo1......but when i take coaching they dint say about migo in third party...so
    friends please help me..what is the relevance of migo here...we are not receiving any goods from  vendor...so whats the use...
    Thanking you

    Dear K. Ram
    MIGO - goods recipt, MIRO - invoice verification.
    Third party process sales order > PR > P.O  > MIRO > Invoice (delivery done by vendor to customer)
    Individual purchase order (IPO)   sales order > PR > P.O  > MIGO >  MIRO > Invoice (delivery done by vendor to company n then to customer).
    You are right concept wise. Ask ur friend or team leader and try to have a discussion on business process.
    Also check the Item category group  is BANS (Material master), Item category  TAS (Sales order)  for third party .
    If it is showing BANC, TAB. It is IPO as mentioned above and u have been disguised with business process explanation from your friend/ seniors or they din't understand the process.
    You can discuss n debate , also raise a point of reducing the master data by eliminating migo transaction in third party.
    This is what been taught to us too.
    Regards
    Pavan Kumar

  • Availability check in third party sales

    Hi SD Gurus,
    I have configured third party sales scenario.
    I have an issue. When I create sales order for the customer the system goes into availability check before creating the Purchase Requisition.  Should the system go into availability check for third party sales scenario as at schedule line category level i.e CS availability check is disabled .
    Please provide your suggestions.  Thx in advance.
    Jayant

    I have one more query.. On doing the MIGO after the Purchase Order is created should the stock increase for the receiving plant in MMBE.. I have checked and it is not getting increased.. Please let me know if the stock should get increased or not..
    Please answer the above 2 queries :
    1)  Related to the availability check in third party sales.
    2)  Second related to MIGO in third party sales.
    Thanks
    Jayant

  • NIGO FOR THIRD PARTY

    MIGO for Third party order
    I create a third party sales order (item cat UTAS (U FOR UK + TAS)), auto generate the PR and convert to the PO.
    When I do the GR agains the PO, the error message is "KE 396; Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number"
    If the 3rd party SO, have the same Sold to and Ship to party, there is no problem during the GR. but
    If the 3rd party SO, have a different Ship to party, when I do the MIGO I encouter with the error as said above.
    Any suggestion would be very appreciate!!!

    Please check these answered links:
    Help.How can i change Message type "KE"
    Re: Inconsistency between a document field and the prof.segment number
    Re: Inconsistency Between a Document Field and the Prof. Segment Number
    Not much idea on this issue, but found those usefull links which are having your error.
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jun 2, 2010 10:35 AM

  • Migo and Delivery for Third Party Shipment

    I have configured third party shipment with statistical goods receipt.
    Due to government regulation (Mexico) we need to keep track on our inventory of this movement so I want to configure MIGO so the receipts are done with 101 E - Special Stock and after that a Delivery and Invoice
    If I try to do this I get error MIGO057 - Movement Type 101 E is not planned, I have take a look into OMJJ
    Should I change item line from TAS to TAB? And schedule line from CS to CB? Somebody has done this any tips?
    Thanks in advance,
    Carlos

    Hi,
    Please check in the PO, the account assignment category should be 1, i think it is E and hence creates the error
    Please check the third party account assignment category and change the PO account assignment category and try to do MIGO
    Please do that and revert if you need more details

  • Third party sales and individual purchase order MIGO DIFFERENCE?

    Hi experts,
                     any difference between third party sales and individual purchase orders goods receipt(MIGO). What's the stock levels chages after goods receipt in both cases? How the system knows that its third party migo and individual purchase order MIGO? Can anybody clarify my question?
    regards,
    raju

    Hi
    In third party you will not be able to create automatic PO
    The schedule line category CS settings in VOV6 order type NB, MM item category 5 and account assignment category settings as X and in VOV7 for TAS create automatic PO ticked will ensure PR creation only and not PO
    As suggested by the other friend you need to run t code ME59N or ME59  for automatic PO creation but certain condition to be met
    1) In the Purchasing View of the material master data, the "Autom. PO" field must be clicked;
    2) In the Purchasing View of the Vendor Master Data, the "Automatic Purchase Order" field must be clicked;
    3) The Outline Agreement or Purchasing Info Record shall be maintained which will allow the automatic copying of unit price and other conditions into PO;
    4) The Source List shall be maintained for the nominated vendor which was shown in either the Outline Agreement or Purchasing Info Record.
    You have to run ME59N transaction  manually or schedule this as  a background job
    Regards
    Raja

  • Why req MIGO and MIRO in third party scenario

    Hello All,
    In third party scenario why we req to do MIGO in ref to PO.
    In 3rd party we create sales order with item cat TAS.
    We got the PR
    with ref to PR we create PO.
    then we do MIGO  and MIRO
    also If vendor is delivering the goods why we do the Delivery and PGI and then Invoice
    Why not Invoice with ref to sales order.
    regards,
    abhijit

    Hi
    In Third Party sales, the Item category is TAS ,if the Vendor directly supplies to the end customer.
    In Item category TAS, "Billing Relevance" is "F", i,e. Order related billing as per invoice quantity.
    If the Item category of the Third Party item is TAS, then Schedule line category is CS in standard. If you will go to CS, you will find , the "Delivery relevance" field is blank and there is no "Goods movement" also. That means no Delivery takes place against the Sales order, so no goods issue.
    This clearly indicates, we do not create any Delivery and no goods receipt takes place in third party sales process, when the vendor directly sends the goods to the customer.
    Once the goods are send to the end customer, Vendor creates an invoice and sends to the ordering company. Now, ordering company goes for Invoice verification ,what the vendor has sent to him. We only go for MIRO here and not MIGO.
    After that, the ordering company, creates the Customer invoice with reference to the Sales order(placed by its customer) and sends it to its customer.
    Complete process:
    Once the order is received from the custome(say ABC)r, the company (say XYZ) creates a Sales order ---> Purchase requisition is automatically triggered from the sales order -
    > from this Purch requisition a PO is created for the vendor -
    > aginst the PO, Vendor delivers the goods to the customer ABC and charge the ordering company,sends invoice for the same to the ordering company XYZ -
    > Ordering company XYZ does Vendor's invoice verification and creates a Customer invoice with reference to customer's(ABC) order and sends to the customer ABC.
    Some times Vendor sends the goods to the ordering company and then ordering company delivers the goods to its customer.
    Vendor does not deliver directly to the end customer in this case.
    In this case Item category is TAB and Schedule line category is CB.
    Here, Billing relevance is "A" - (Delivery related billing) in the Item category TAB, that means here Delivery takes place and Billing is created with reference to the Delivery created to the customer.
    In Schedule line category CB, you will find, 'Delivery relevance" field is activated and there is a movement type "601".
    So, Delivery and goods issue both takes place here.
    Here we go for both MIGO and MIRO.

  • Third party sales COPA document is not getting generated for MIGO

    Hi
    Kindly help to resolve the following.
    Third Party Sale Scenario
    While doing to MIGO accounting document and controlling document is getting generated, but not generating COPA document.
    In KEI2 and KE4IM assignments are maitained for condition type and value field.
    For SD the COPA document is getting generated.
    Kindly help to resolve.
    Thanks n Regards
    N Sathish Kumar

    If you have created new GL Accounts to map the Third party scenario, the pre-requesite is that you might need to create cost elemenet with category 11 or 12.
    Further only assignments are condition types assigned to value fields.
    Check if the billing type is reset under TCode KE4W.

  • Third party PO MIGO

    Hi all,
    I have created one new document type with allowed item category =S only. I am making PO with this doc type to directly supply to customer. On his information I will make GR.
    But in GR (MIGO), the storage location field is mandatory. It is obviously not relevant to enter a storage location field for a material delivered to customers premises.
    I need to do the settings that this 'Storage location ' field does not appear at all in MIGO screen for such PO. Can somebody tell me how to do it ?

    Hi sumit,
    You have to create the Purchase order with reference to Sales order through
    Purchase requisition otherwise third party scenario will not work beacause in sales order you have to assign Vendor at schedule line ->procurment tab,also sales order item cat is TAS-Third party item for material with item category group BANS.Only this way third party scenario is work.
    You can not create directly purchase order by ME21N transaction ,You have to Process Purchase requisition (which is generated through sales order) by ME57 t-code.
    This scenario is purly combination of Sales and Purchasing (MM) module,you can not proceed this by any single module.
    If you fallow this steps then at MIGO,system will not ask for Storage location.
    Rewards if helpful
    Regards
    sanjay L

Maybe you are looking for