Migo & Miro Check

Hi all,
My client requirement is to check the pending Miro at the time of Migo.
The flow is when end user doing migo, if there is any miro pending for any migo at plant level then the system should propose an error.
is it possible in standard or i have to go for Z-programs
helpful solutions ll be rewarded.
regards
Dhinakar

Hi
You can use the BAdi - MB_MIGO_ITEM_BAdI .
Perform the Check for the IR based on the Purchase order & goods recipts.
You can trigger the exception message
In the standard system, the Business Add-In is not active.
There is no default code that would run without an active implementation.
The Business Add-In is not filter-dependent.
The Business Add-In cannot be used more than once.
To activate the Business Add-In, you must create an active implementation. Do this in Inventory Management and Physical Inventory Customizing and choose the relevant activity under Maintain Customer-Exits and Business Add-Ins.
For more information about this procedure, see the SAP Library under
Basis Components -> ABAP Workbench -> Changing the SAP Standard -> Business Add-Ins -> Implementing Business Add-Ins.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Similar Messages

Check migo & miro

hi gurus
supoose i ahve create no of purchase order? then how i check how many remaing migo & miro?
thx in advance.

Hi
in transaction ME23N for the PO in the Heder Data - Status Tab you can check the Details of the PO, like to be dleivered to be invoiced details
If you need the Item details also use Transaction ME2N , enter the PO Number & execute.
In the Disply you can check the Data in
Still to be delivered
Still to be invoiced
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

We want to stop Budget AVC checks for MIGO & MIRO in Live System

HI Everyone.
We are using Funds Management (BCS) and at the inital stage we are checking the budget at PR, PO, GR & Invoice level.
Now, due to the functional constraints we've decided to remove the Budget AVC checks for GR (MIGO) and IR (MIRO)
Note: At the movement we are not using any activity groups w.r.t tolerance groups, bcoz if we specify the activity groups for only PR & PO, system wont check the budget at GR & IR but, system will post the negative values (FMB_PT01)
So, as a work around, we've defined derivation steps at business transaction level (RMWE & RMRP) by assigning commitment item which is having financial transaction 40 & commitment item type 3, where system wont check the budget.
But, system is not performing the derivation based on this rule in PRD, where with the same config system able to work properly as we desired in DEV client and able to bypass the MIGO & MIRO.
Can anyone, give some suggestions or best way to achieve the said requirement of avoiding the AVC check @ MIGO & MIRO level.
Thanks in Advance.
Raja Sekhar

Dear Mar,
I've maintained the Pre-development parameters in PRD and it is working fine as per my Derivation rule.
Can you tell me is there is similar kind of parameter, for service entry sheet also for the same purpose.
i've tried by maintaining parameter FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in FM01X, due to which in ML81N system taking the fund center as per the derivation, but when i am creating PO for services, system is not able to derive the fund center,
where as previously, before maintaining the above parameter, system use to derive the fund center based on cost center, which is not working after this maintainance.
Any suggestions on this.
Thanks for your support
Raja Talluri

Sending Mail to when MIGO,MIRO or VL09 gets triggered

Hi,
I have a requirement to send a mail to a designated email address when either MIGO,MIRO or VL09 gets triggered.And we were triggering the mails from the correponding user exits since triggering mail trigger in the form of delivery output by creating an output type was not faesible for our requirement since we had to do some more checks for company code,movement type etc before triggering output type to send mail.
I want to know if this is is not a correct solution from technical point of view to trigger emails from any document processing user exits?
Thanks,
Chithra

I have the same request, did you solve it?

Document splitting not working in MIGO/MIRO

Hi Experts,
I have the following PO, Account Assignment Categories, F: Expected double entries are as follows:
MIGO:
Debit GL: Expense
Credit GRIR:
MIRO:
Debit GRIR:
Credit Vendor
At my expese GL, I have cost center filled in; and in entry view I can read the cost center / profit center (and also segment) in MIGO / MIRO double entry.
Problem: But, when I click on the General Ledger view, both MIGO/MIRO double entries do not have profit center/segment split. All of the cost objects (cost center, profit center, segment) do not exist in the General ledger view (these fields are blank).
Question:
Does anyone have any idea?
I believe this should be document splitting settings which are not correctly. Therefore, does anyone have working splitting method of these MIGO/MIRO function?
Thanks in advance,
sbmel

Dear,
Please check what is the splitting characteristics you have defined in
SPRO>IMG> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)> Business transaction>Document Splitting>Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting, check whether you have defined Proce Center and Segment as the characteristics or not.
Br, Vivek

Problem with migo, miro

Hi All,
I am having a message when i do MIGO, MIRO as follow.
Purchase order 4500017222 does not exist"
But the above number is my purchase order i got it when i created with PO wiht ME21N.
I think tables r not updating . can any one give me the solution for the same.
Thanku

Hi
Please check in the PO ta the header level whether a tab release strtergy exists.If so then go to transaction ME29N and release the PO.After going to transaction ME29N open the release stratergy tab in the header and release it and save the PO.Then try to do GR aganist this PO.
Along with this,please check some other settings also,which may be also the reason due to which your GR is blocked
Please check the delivery tab of PO.Check whether the GR check box is checked or not.If not checked,please check it.
Just check you have created standard PO.If by mistake you have you have created a framework order then there will not be any GR.
HOPE THIS WILL HELP YOU
Reward if useful
Thanks and Regards
SHYAM.R

MIGO/MIRO - possible? posting date accept only workdays

Is possible to accept only workday dates in MIRO and MIGO for posting date?
if any one knows please let me know how.
thanks.

Angelita,
If that is the case, then the only way to achieve this would to be use an exit/BADI and do a validation on the posting date in the MIGO/MIRO header and display a warning/error message to the user as required.
I think BADI MRM_HEADER_CHECK should work for the MIRO header validation. I am not too sure about MIGO - have an ABAPer check out BADI MB_MIGO_BADI.
Hope this helps.
H Narayan

Created batch material and made po, migo,miro now change to non batch.

Hi All.
I have created Batch Material mm01 with batch management check box.
Created PO and donetransaction of migo, miro.
Now i want to change to non batch material.
i like to remove batch management check box in mm02
Regards.
Parameshwar.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 7, 2011 9:23 PM

Thanks Kunal.
I will Click on display errors for the list of open documents.
Then i will clear all documents.
Next I will change MM02 by removing Check box to normal material
It should work for me.
My Doubt is after this also i need to run the program to change to non batch material.
Clarify me about program running.
Regards.
Parameshwar.
Thanks MM dudes.

Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

Hi,
My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
Please help how to do it.
Regard's
Parag lute

Hi Parag
To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
Hope this anwers your query
Prasad

How MIGO/MIRO updates SRM PO with GR/IR number?

Hi Experts,
For a ECS SRM PO, if we do MIGO/MIRO directly in ECC, which FM updates the PO history in SRM with ECC GR/IR number immediately? Since CLEANER or GET STATUS jobs run at intervals, I guess these jobs do not do it.
So I would like to know the call stack of FMs. What is the FM that is called by MIGO/MIRO transaction till the FM that updates PO's RELATED DOCs section with ECC GR/IR number?
Thanks!
Regards,
Karthik

Hi Karthik,
If you post GR directly in ERP via MIGO, when program clean_reqreq_up processes the "AV" entry of the PO in table bbp_document_tab, it will only update the statistics data of SRM PO. GR document number is not updated back and saved anywhere in SRM PO.
Report: clean_reqreq_up
=========================================================
                WHEN gc_doc_be_po_call_offs.
                  CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_ACT_VAL_UPDATE'
                    EXPORTING
                      iv_po_number   = selarea-reqno
                      iv_no_statics = gc_yes
                    EXCEPTIONS
                      po_locked      = 2
                      internal_error = 2
                      OTHERS         = 2.
=========================================================
System will only read the GR document information when you check the SRM document history, for example, navigate to the Tracking tab at PO header or Related Document tab at PO item.
Regards,
Wendy

Categoria de Nota na MIGO/MIRO

Bom dia Pessoal!
Eu li todas as informações trocadas em relação a entrada da NFe no ERP e arquivamento do XML, porém ainda estou com uma dúvida. Poderiam me ajudar?
Quando recebemos um DANFE do Fornecedor, ao fazer o lançamento na MIGO/MIRO desta NFe, utilizo a categoria de Nota "tradicional" ou "eletrônica"?
Att.
Adriana Simões

Bom dia Adriana,
Sobre as postagens no forum, procure criar uma thread (questão) nova para cada problema, de forma a facilitar no apoio e também na procura pelos outros.
Por exemplo este subject é "Re: Categoria de Nota na MIGO/MIRO"
Independente dos cenários que você está testando agora está com dois novos problemas:
1 - Problema no GRC está sim relacionado a PIS/COFINS, acredito que as threads abaixo tragam novas informações:
Situação Fiscal PIS e COFINS (Tax Situation)
Validação NF-e Campo CST / IM
Requisitos para implementação do SPEd NF-e
Alteração de NF-e
2-B12_REFNFE trata-se de alguma inconsistência na tag de Nota Fiscal Eletrônica de Referência. Verifique se o valor da REFNFE está com 44 posições de números, ou se está faltando por exemplo o número aleatório ou dígito de controle (verifique se tem espaços entre ou então não tem 44 posições).
Sendo assim, peço que não economize em threads do forum cada questão é uma questão. De forma que você poderá resolver uma questão e fechá-la e a outra ainda continuará aberta.
Atenciosamente,
Fernando Da Ró

Difference in Profit center for GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO Transaction

1) We have created material 106267 with material type ROH. We have assigned profit center 1001052999 (common profit center) to material.
2) We have created WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF with profit center 1001052002.
3) We have created PO 4000000236 for account assignment category u2018Qu2019 for the above material with WBS element MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF   . After posting GRN for PO 4000000236 we have identified that for GR/IR account profit center is taken from material master & for stock account profit center is taken from WBS element.
Please find the below Flow
In MIGO
Entry
Accounting Document number in Entry View
5000001125
PSKY          G/L Code      Description
         Amount
     Curr.
          Profit Center
     WBS element
89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
Document number in Ledger View
L.item     PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
1     89          231101     RAW MATERIAL STOCK     2,000.00     INR          1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
2     96          162101     GR/IR-Material     -2,000.00     INR          1001052999     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
3     50          162001     InterSegment Clrg     -2,000.00     INR          1001052002
4     40          162001     InterSegment Clrg     2,000.00     INR          1001052999
It should take profit center from WBS element for GR/IR account & Stock account but for GR/IR account profit center is taking form material master & for stock account profit center is taking from WBS element.
MIRO
Entry
Accounting Document number Entry View
5100000657
PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
31          100000     Ambuja Cement Ltd     -1,996.00     INR     V4
86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4
50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR
50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR
Document number in Ledger View
PK     SG     Account     Description         Amount     Curr.     Tx     Profit Ctr     WBS element
31          160100     CRS-Domestic Supp     -1,996.00     INR     V4     1001052002
86          162101     GR/IR-Material     2,000.00     INR     V4     1001052002     MUM-RIV002.SS.RC.RF
40          254001     VAT Receivable     80     INR     V4     1001052002
50          172103     TDS PAYABLE -194C     -42     INR          1001052002
50          176101     WCT-TDS payable     -42     INR          1001052002
In the MIRO Accounting Document profit center for [162101] GR/IR-Material A/C has taken from WBS element
Please note that we are using document splitting with Profit center is mandatory
We have created same scenario for Cost center. After posting the GRN profit center is taken from cost center for both GR/IR account in MIGO & MIRO accounting documents.
Plez help

Hello
ANy suggestion for question & if solved do let me know

Substitution of account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO

Issue: Need to change account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO
example:       HKONT(GL Account)       KTOSL(Transaction type)
               1000000001              XX1
               1000000002              XX2
               1000000003              XX3
If XX3 exist then replace hkont of XX1 to hkont of XX2
expected result is:
               1000000002              XX1
               1000000002              XX2
               1000000003              XX3
Solution with problems:
1. Used substitution GGB1>Financial Account>line item for field HKONT. My problem with this is, since the data is in line item. How can I get the replacement of my account(shown above sample). if BSEG structure only shows 1 line item. I tried using bool_data-bseg. but its empty. Im assuming bool_data is used when callup 003(complete document) is triggered.
I used subtitution field G/L - Exit <UXXX>
Any Ideas or solutions would be great!!

if your Substituion exit is called then you can directly change the value of
BSEG-HKONT there according to your requirement.

MIGO/MIRO Posting date to Display mode

HI all,
How can we set MIGO/MIRO Posting date field to Display mode.
Can this be set for User specific.
Please advise.Its Urgent.
Regards,
Jag

hi
for migo
do following
SPRO>MM>Inventory Mgmt/Physical Inventory-->Fields selection for goodsmovement Initial/Header Screens
for miro
U need to change the field selection for the posting keys used in MIRO.
go to OB41, there for the posting key 31 u do the field selection.
reward if useful
regards
kunal

PO-MIGO-MIRO vs. PO-MIGO-F-90

Hi,
I did the following scenarios for purchasing & paying for an asset:
> PO-MIGO-MIRO
> PO-MIGO-F-90
What is the difference between MIRO and F-90? I mean besides processing.
How does F-90 affect purchasing docs, GR status, and reports? Will the PO be cleared/closed?
Thanks!

When there is a PO you need to use MIRO and not F-90
The posting from the G/R from the PO is.
GR
70 Asset               100
50 Gr/IR account            100
Invoice MIRO
50 Gr/IR account   100
31 Vendor                      100
When there is prices differences it will be posted normal on the asset
What you then want to do with F-90? When there is a PO the invoice should always be posted with MIRO assigned to the PO! Other wise you have problems with your GR/IR account and the PO still expect an invoice!

Migo & Miro Check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for