MIGO not possible when posting with Earmarked Funds

Hi,
I am using Earmarked Funds to budget for Sales Promotion Expenses.
Have set the  field KBLNR as mandatory for a few GL Accounts and have set it as optional Posting Key 81.
I have created a Purchase Order with a Earmarked Fund. But when I am trying to do a MIGO for the PO I get the following error message "Field Doc. item is a required field for G/L account"Message no. F5808.
The field Earmarked funds is hidden in MIGO transaction .
Any clues on how I could bring this field in MIGO so that it can flow from the Purchase Order.
Thanks and Regards.

Hi,
Thanks.
I have changed the Field status and have made the field earmarked funds as mandatory through a FI validations for FI postings.
I tried to check the field at the time of creating Purchase Orders and used Exit_SAPLFMCH_001.
But this exit doesn't seem to work as the fields are getting cleared when the save button is hit and the Purchase Order gets saved with out the Earmarked Funds.
Is there any other exit or work around I can make Earmarked Funds mandatory for certain Commitment Items at the time of creating Purchase Orders ?
Regards.

Similar Messages

  • Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments:CJ88

    Hi Experts,
    When I settle WBS Element cost to the Asset Under Construction using transaction CJ88, I receive following error.
    AA571 Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
    Please help.
    Thank You.

    Hi,
    first please check if the message AA 571 is right:                                                                               
    -  Please check table ANLC. If ANLC-KANZA + ANLC-ANSAZ < 0    AA 571                                                                               
    -  Check asset values (AW01N, ANEP, ANLC) and find out where the negative down payments come from (tty 180, 181)                                                                               
    However, in some cases a negative down payment balance cannot be avoided  (for example through translation differences in foreign currency  areas). This is the problem of AA 571. Sometimes it is not justified. For this                
    cases we have the following note:                                                                               
    860038  Error AA571 not justified                                                  
    Using SM30, for the T100S table, create an entry for the message                      
    class AA, message number 571, allowed message type "AEW" and                          
    standard message type "E". Select the entry as 'Switch off'.                                                                               
    If when you post to a fixed asset the down payments are negative, or                  
    become negative through the posting, you continue to receive an error as              
    a default with these changes.                                                                               
    Recommended procedure:                                                                               
    o  Change this message to a warning message for one or several                    
           special users. This user should then be used to post to any such               
           fixed asset that has down payments that are already negative or                
           become negative through posting.                                                                               
    o  This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down               
           payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency                      
           rounding.                                                                      
    regards Bernhard
    Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 AM

  • Error: Not possible to post down payment clearing.There are no down payment

    Hi expert,
    I am running a settlement for an internal order and encounter the following error message.
    "Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments."
    Message no. AA571
    When checked on the vendor, the invoice has been cleared in the same month before the settlement. Under the Internal order line items, there is still an unsettled amount of the invoice.
    This internal order settles to an AUC asset. Previous month settlement was ok. Only problem with december.
    The downpayment acct is currently zero.
    Is there something wrong with the message table, or the posting of the vendor invoice ? Anything to do with the special GL indicator ?
    Kindly advise what is the cause and the method to resolved this asap.
    Thanks.
    Angel.

    Hi Angel ,
    My client also getting error message while doing settlement(T.C.KO88) even though Note.8600038 applied.
    Error Message:Not Possible to post down payment clearing .There are no down payments.
    Message: AA571
    If your issue is solved.
    please can you tell how did you solve this issue.
    Thanks,

  • Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code (Message no. FS206)

    Hi Guys,
    I am facing very critical issue on down Payment request, to process with saperate Tax Value.
    We are supporting on Roll-out for Germany. We have implemented all standard SAP processes in the Project. We have also implemented many interfaces and one of the Interface is Sabrix Tax Engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code).
    As per the Germany legal requirement, the Tax has to get calculated whenever the funds gets transfered from one Bank Account to Another Bank Account.
    Coming to the issue: In the Customer Down Payment scenario, we are creating the Down payment request for Customer and as per Germany local requirement the Tax of 19% has to get calculated on Down payment.
    For an Example: We have the Sales Order Contract Value of 100,000.00 EUR and we are creating the Down Payment reqeust of 10% which is 10000 EUR + Tax 19% 1900 EUR.
    We are trying to post the Down Payment request in F-37 and we get the issue "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". This error is appearing due to Sabrix Tax engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code) has implemented in our System.
    We have gone through the SAP notes 97288 and 213567 and understood that the Standard SAP does not support us to post the Down Payment request with Separate Tax Value, when the External Tax Engine has implemented.
    I request you to suggest me, if you have already seen this issue in any of your Projects and fixed through the work-around solution. We have been working on work-around since 2 weeks, however no result.
    Below is the error message:
    Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code
    Message no. FS206

    HI Preeti,
    Thanks for your response. We have already seen the similar SAP notes and the SAP notes explains that the "Down pmnts with taxes cannot be done along with with jur.code". The only solution is to post the DP without Tax.
    However there might be some workaround which can be done in SAP, to process the Down Payment/Advance Payments with Tax Value along with Jurisdiction Code. I would like to know this.
    Did any one seen this case in your experiece, if yes, what is the work-around solution?.
    Need your help guys!,...
    Regards,
    Damodar Naidu

  • Premiere Pro cc 2014 do not import After Effects composition. Inside Premiere Pro CC 2014 is not possible call back After Effects, is not possible to work with After Effects. Thank you

    Premiere Pro cc 2014 do not import After Effects composition. Inside Premiere Pro CC 2014 is not possible call back After Effects, is not possible to work with After Effects. Thank you

    You haven't given us much to go on here.  What exactly are you doing and what exactly happens when you try?  Which specific version of each program are you using?  (Go to Help>About...)
    On a side note, a simple, brief thread title is all that's needed.  Something like "After Effects Issue" would be fine.  You don't need the full question there.

  • KO88:Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments

    Hi,
    We are doing Full Settlement of an order in TCode KO88. There are few Down payments against a PO. Initially, system gave an error as follows: -
    You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 120002 0 with this trans.type
        Message no. AA341
    Diagnosis
        A down payment was posted to asset 120002 0. In depreciation area 01, if
        not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
    Procedure
        Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first
        clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
    We cleared the down payments and ran KO88 again, but a new error popped as given below.
    Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
        Message no. AA571
    Any help will be acclaimed.
    Regards,
    CMC Team
    Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 2:59 PM
    Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 3:01 PM

    Friend,
    Probably you did not take the trouble to search the SAP Oss for notes on this error message.
    Please search for 'AA571' in the notes section of SAP oss and you will find several notes addressing the exact issue you are having.
    For your convenience.
    www.service.sap.com/notes
    Best regards,
    Vishal Thakur.

  • Error FS206 Down pmnts w/ taxes not permitted when processing with jur.code

    Issue:   I am encountering a problem entering Taxes when applying  down payments received from customers since we are using a jurisdiction code taxation procedure.  This process works as desired in Europe for our firm.  I found OSS 97288 which is not valid for version ECC 6.0.  Please assist due to US go-live in 2 weeks.Process:  Create Down Payment Request for cash in advance.  Required to tax at this point.  Billing document creates a noted item in the G/L (Special G/L).  I apply customer's payment via transaction F-29 and receive error "FS206 Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code."
    Settings:  1) Alternative Recon account for Special GL posting has The tax category on the GL account = B "Output tax - down payments managed gross."  2) Transaction OBXB specifies tax clearing account for transaction key MVA.  This G/Laccount has same tax category setting (B). My settings work perfectly for Europe since they are not taxed via juridicition codes.
    Thank you in advance!

    Check the GL master of the alternative recon account. Ideally there should be no setting in the tax fields as there is no tax calculated on down payment but only on the final amount. Leave the tax fiel blank and do not check mark posting without tax allowed.

  • CRMD_SHORTCUT modification is not possible when customizing not allowed cli

    CRMD_SHORTCUT modification is not possible when the client closed to
    customizing.
    How can we change the AUDIENCE TYPE and the AUDIENCE KEY of a saved
    search when the client is a productive and no changes allowed settings
    has been made?

    Hi, why don't you just make a navigation banner (bar) with the buttons they should be able to reach? Page group properties is where you decide the default navigation banner. So make a new banner for your users and set it as the default one.
    Kristin

  • E not possible to post down payment clearing.

    Dear all sap guru's
    iam getting this meg:
    could you explaine me?
    document XXXX  E not possible to post down payment clearing. there are no downpayment.
    regs
    laks

    Hi Lakshmi,
    Give some clarity for your issue.
    Which t.code ur using
    and check it downpayment is in the open item or not.
    giv me the reply i will update you

  • Why isn't it not possible to synchronize with itunes 11.1.4  the contacts and calendars of my iphone and ipad with outlook 2010 as it was possible with itunes 10?

    Why isn't it not possible to synchronize with itunes 11.1.4  the contacts and calendars of my iphone and ipad with outlook 2010 as it was possible before with itunes 10?

    Hello, Ran12345. 
    Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities. 
    It is still possible to sync contacts and calendars from Outlook using iTunes.  If you are experiencing issues with this, here is the best article to go through. 
    Troubleshooting Sync Services on Windows with Microsoft Outlook 2003, Outlook 2007, or Outlook 2010
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2776
    Cheers,
    Jason H. 

  • CS3 Postscript fonts not visible when Installed with Suitcase 11.0 Vista Ult64

    CS3 Postscript fonts not visible when Installed with Suitcase 11.0 on Vista Ultimate 64bit.
    Truetype and Opentype work fine. I have searched through all the forums here multiple times, but not found a solution. The only workaround I found was to manually put the font files in c:/ProgramFiles(x86)/CommonFiles/Adobe/Fonts.
    When I put any font files in that folder, they show up in CS3 for use, but not in windows apps. I thought I would make a permanent work around by placing all of my uninstalled font files in that folder, then use suitcase to install them from there. That didn't work because EVERY font in that folder is available to CS3 and turned on. Do they get installed when you put them in there?? It didn't seem like they were installed, and windows apps didn't see them.
    These are workarounds anyway. My main goal is to have suitcase work so I can organize my fonts efficiently. Extensis blames the font and CS3. I have read that there are adobe issues with other font management software as well as suitcase. Any help would be appreciated.

    Got mine FIXED here is what i did:
    Windows 7 64bit SP1, CS 5
    Postscript fonts (comprising of *.pfb + *.pfm files) did not show up in any CS5 app, but showed OK in Word, Excel, Notepad etc.
    Tried  activating through Suitcase Fusion 2 and also through FontExpert 2009 -  but neither of them made the fonts visible in CS5 apps
    1) open Start Menu/Control Panel/Fonts
    2) on the sidebar there is "Font settings" item
    3) set the settings as i did
    [    ]  Hide fonts based on language settings
    [ x ]  Allow fonts to be installed using a shortcut (advanced)
    FIXED mine,
    now i can use Suitcase Fusion 2 to install any PFB/PFM fonts without any problems...
    PLEASE IF THIS WORKED FOR YOU TOO, LEAVE A MESSAGE HERE SO OTHERS KNOW IF THIS FIX IS 100% WORKING

  • Cost center error when posting to a fund - Message KI222

    Hi,
    We are getting error KI222 when we try to post to a fund. The message says Cost center XXX/ABCD does not exist on xx/xx/xxxx. The problem is we do not have a cost center called 'ABCD'. Note 315350 has already been applied in our system.
    Has any one seen this error? if so, how was it fixed?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    I am also running into this issue. I am trying to post a cash discount and system is throwing this error that cost center does not exist on this date. But we do not have any cost center with that number.
    Were you able to resolve your issue? If so, can you please share the solution. I appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Shalu

  • FMLA standard hours infotype 2001 not editable when working with date range

    Hi All,
    The issue described below arises at the Juncture between FMLA Workbench and Absence Infotype IT2001.
    When we try to tie a FMLA Request to Absences the process takes us to the Infotype PA2001 screen wherein we would like the Absence Hours Field to be Editable so that we could enter Hours (less than full day).
    The process works fine when the FMLA absence is for a single day, i.e. if an employee availed a FMLA leave on a day (whether full day or part of a day) the Absence Hours field (PA2001-STDAZ) is editable and the user can enter any number of hours of his choice.
    But the process faces a glitch when the FMLA absence spans over a period of time (i.e. an employee availed a FMLA leave for over a period wherein each day may or may not be a full day absence, in this scenario it would be best if the system allow the user to enter Absence Hours so that the User could enter the exact number of Absence hours correctly. But unfortunately, when an absence spans multiple days the Infotype 2001 screen dynamically turns the Absence Hours field (PA2001-STDAZ) uneditable (grayed out) and the system forcefully enters hours equal to the sum of the work schedule hours for each working day covered in the span of period for which we are trying to enter FMLA Absence Hours.
    I have used the USER EXIT and the BADI route and tried to change the Screen Table to editable, but with no luck.
    Wondering, if anyone of you could help me out of this glitch.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi,
       I don't think this is possible.
       You cannot make the Hours field editable for a date range.
       I don't think its feasible to enter absence hours on a day basis given a date range.
       Better think of creating a custom infotype to enter absence hours .
       (Design would be : based on the date range entered , say 01.01.2011 to 05.01.2011 , you should get five input enabled
         boxes(dynamically) for five days to enter the absence hours , this is not possible in standard infotype ..... )
    Regards,
    Srini.

  • Fields suppressed when posting with FB01 and special gl-indicator

    Hello everybody,
    I have the following problem:
    I'm trying to make a vendor open item posting with transaction code 'FB01' and a special G/L-Indicator. Although the field status group of posting key and target reconciliation account is set all to optional, some fields which should be populated are suppressed, such as ZLSPR or ZBD3T.
    Does anybody know what the reason for this is?
    Thank you in advance!
    Regards,
    B

    Hello,
    If the posting keys and reconciliation account's field status variants are maintained correctly, then you should also check if you are using any screen / transaction variants
    I am completely not sure about this, but you can check this. I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Error when posting with Safari 10.3.2

    Hi all,
    This is odd, I can't post in 10.3 Usage and the Leopard Usage forum and here using Safari 1.3.2 but using Camino I was able to get right in and post here (or at least I'll see when I hit the "Post Message" button. Safari let me in but would keep returning errors when trying to post a topic or reply.
    Just thought I'd post here my situation as of right now. Anyone else having problems? Sorry, I lost the copy/paste of the error when I tried to post here with Safari.
    littleshoulders
    edit: Just now am editing this post with Safari again and it seems to be working again. Weird...I suppose just another small glitch while posting.
    Message was edited by: littleshoulders

    problem resolved itself. Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for